Revision of Failed Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Background: The most common bariatric surgical operation in Europe, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), is reported to have a high incidence of long-term complications. Also, insufficient weight loss is reported. We investigated whether revision to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is a safe and effective therapy for failed LAGB and for further weight loss. Methods: From Jan 1999 to May 2004, 613 patients underwent LAGB. Of these, 47 underwent later revisional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP). Using a prospectively collected database, we analyzed these revisions. All procedures were done by two surgeons with extensive experience in bariatric surgery. Results: All patients were treated with laparoscopic (n=26) or open (n=21) RYGBP after failed LAGB. Total follow-up after LAGB was 5.5±2.0 years. For the RYGBP, mean operating time was 161±53 minutes, estimated blood loss was 219±329 ml, and hospital stay was 6.7±4.5 days. There has been no mortality. Early complications occurred in 17%. There was only one late complication (2%) – a ventral hernia. The mean BMI prior to any form of bariatric surgery was 49.2±9.3 kg/m², and decreased to 45.8±8.9 kg/m² after LAGB and was again reduced to 37.7±8.7 kg/m² after RYGBP within our follow-up period. Conclusion: Conversion of LAGB to RYGBP is effective to treat complications of LAGB and to further reduce the weight to healthier levels in morbidly obese patients.     

Laparoscopic Conversion of Laparoscopic Gastric Banding to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Review of 70 Patients

Background: The feasibility and outcomes of conversion of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) was evaluated. Methods: From November 2000 to March 2004, all patients who underwent laparoscopic conversion of LAGB to LRYGBP were retrospectively analyzed. The procedure included adhesiolysis, resection of the previous band, creation of an isolated gastric pouch, 100-cm Roux-limb, side-to-side jejuno-jejunostomy, and end-to-end gastro-jejunostomy. Results: 70 patients (58 female, mean age 41) with a median BMI of 45±11 (27-81) underwent attempted laparoscopic conversion of LAGB to an RYGBP. Indications for conversion were insufficient weight loss or weight regain after band deflation for gastric pouch dilatation in 34 patients (49%), inadequate weight loss in 17 patients (25%), symptomatic proximal gastric pouch dilatation in 15 patients (20%), intragastric band migration in 3 patients (5%), and psychological band intolerance in 1 patient. 3 of 70 patients (4.3%) had to be converted to a laparotomy because of severe adhesions. Mean operative time was 240±40 SD min (210-280). Mean hospital length of stay was 7.2 days. Early complication rate was 14.3% (10/70). Late major complications occurred in 6 patients (8.6%). There was no mortality. Median excess body weight loss was 70±20%. 60% of patients achieved a BMI of <33 with mean follow-up 18 months. Conclusion: Laparoscopic conversion of LAGB to RYGBP is a technically challenging procedure that can be safely integrated into a bariatric treatment program with good results. Short-term weight loss is very good.     

Revision of Failed Gastric Restrictive Operations to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Impact of Multiple Prior Bariatric Operations on Outcome

Background: Morbid obesity is now an epidemic with considerable associated morbidity for which bariatric surgery has been the only effective treatment. Despite its success, occasional patients require revision because of weight regain or mechanical complications. The impact of multiple prior bariatric operations on complications and weight loss after revision to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) was evaluated. Methods: All patients undergoing revisional surgery to RYGBP by the senior author from 1997 through 2004 were retrospectively reviewed at a multi-center academic institution. Patients who had previously undergone multiple revisional operations (MR) were compared to patients who had undergone primary ("first-time") revision (PR). Demographics, indications for revision, complications, and weight loss were reviewed. Results: 66 patients underwent open revision to RYGBP after failed bariatric operations, with 12 in the MR group and 54 in the PR group. Mean preoperative BMI was 46.1 and 45.2 (P=0.8), respectively. Operative time (227 vs 162 min, P=0.07), blood loss (517 vs 313 ml, P=0.09) and hospital length of stay (11.5 vs 6.7 days, P=0.2) were higher in the MR group. Major perioperative complications occurred in 16.7% of MR patients compared to 9.3% of PR patients (P=0.6). Percent of excess weight loss (%EWL) has been 54.3% in the MR group and 60.6% in the PR group (P=0.6). Average follow-up is 26 and 23 months, respectively. Conclusion: Although operative times, blood loss, and LOS were greater in MR patients, RYGBP can be performed in patients with multiple previous bariatric operations with acceptable weight loss and complication rates.     

Use of Adjustable Silicone Gastric Banding for Revision of Failed Gastric Bariatric Operations

Background: Revision of gastric bariatric operations is sometimes technically difficult and may fail to achieve prolonged weight reduction. The use of the adjustable silicone gastric banding (ASGB) offers a new approach for these revisions. Methods: ASGB was performed as a revisional procedure on 37 patients whose initial bariatric operations were as follows: silastic ring vertical gastroplasty (21), gastric bypass (12), horizontal gastroplasty (3) and vertical banded gastroplasty (1). Results: The length of the procedure varied from 55 to 145 minutes (mean 83 minutes). Intraoperative complications included two fundic tears which were sutured without any postoperative sequelae. Five patients needed reoperation during the first postoperative year due to gastric volvulus (1), tubing tear (1) and development of postoperative ventral hernia (3). BMI fell from 44.8 ± SD 8.07 to 33.4 ± 6.9 kg/m² for patients operated with BMI higher than 35 kg/m² and from 29.2 ± 3.32 to 25.4 ± 2.8 kg/m² for patients operated with BMI lower than 35 kg/m². Conclusions: ASBG can be performed with revisions with an acceptable complication rate and post-operative weight reduction.     

Fasting Plasma Ghrelin Concentrations 6 Months after Gastric Bypass are not Determined by Weight Loss or Changes in Insulinemia

Background: Ghrelin is a gastric peptide with potent orexigenic effects. Circulating ghrelin concentrations are increased in obese subjects, but increase after weight loss. However, in patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP), a decrease in ghrelin levels has been reported. The effect of comparable weight loss induced by either adjustable gastric banding (AGB), RYGBP or conventional dietary treatment (Conv) on ghrelinemia was studied. Methods: 24 matched obese male patients in whom similar weight loss had been achieved by either AGB (n=8), RYGBP (n=8) or Conv (n=8) were studied before and 6 months after treatment start. The independence of ghrelin concentrations from body mass index (BMI) and weight loss was further analyzed in a group of patients with total gastrectomy (TtGx, n=6). Results: Comparable weight loss after 6 months exerted significantly different effects on plasma ghrelin concentrations, depending on the procedure applied (AGB: 424.6 ± 32.8 pg/ml; RYGBP: 131.4 ± 13.5; Conv: 457.3 ± 18.7; P<0.001). Without significant differences in body weight and BMI, patients who had undergone the RYGBP exhibited a statistically significant decrease in fasting ghrelin concentrations, while the other two procedures (AGB and Conv) showed a weight loss-induced increase in ghrelin levels. Despite significant differences in BMI between RYGBP and TtGx patients after 6 months (31.9 ± 2.2 vs 22.0 ± 0.7 kg/m², respectively; P<0.05), both groups showed similar ghrelin concentrations. Conclusion: The reduction in circulating ghrelin concentrations in RYGBP patients after 6 months of surgery are not determined by an active weight loss or an improved insulin-sensitivity but rather depend on the surgically-induced bypass of the ghrelin-producing cell population of the fundus.     

Predictors of Weight Status following Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass

Background: Weight loss after bariatric surgery varies and depends on many factors, such as time elapsed since surgery, baseline weight, and co-morbidities. Methods: We analyzed weight data from 494 patients who underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) by one surgeon at an academic institution between June 1999 and December 2004. Linear regression was used to identify factors in predicting % excess weight loss (%EWL) at 1 year. Results: Mean patient age at time of surgery was 44 ± 9.6 (SD), and the majority were female (83.8%). The baseline prevalence of co-morbidities included 24% for diabetes, 42% for hypertension, and 15% for hypercholesterolemia. Baseline BMI was 51.5 ± 8.5 kg/m². Mean length of hospital stay was 3.8 ± 4.6 days. Mortality rate was 0.6%. Follow-up weight data were available for 90% of patients at 6 months after RYGBP, 90% at 1 year, and 51% at 2 years. Mean %EWL at 1 year was 65 ± 15.2%. The success rate (≥50 %EWL) at 1 year was 85%. Younger age and lower baseline weight predicted greater weight loss. Males lost more weight than females. Diabetes was associated with a lower %EWL. Depression did not significantly predict %EWL. Conclusion: The study demonstrated a 65 %EWL and 85% success rate at 1 year in our bariatric surgery program. Our finding that most pre-surgery co-morbidities and depression did not predict weight loss may have implications for pre-surgery screening.     

Revision of Failed Gastric Bypass to Distal Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Review of 65 Cases

Background: No bariatric operation has been documented to effect adequate weight loss in all patients. Patients with inadequate weight loss or significant weight regain with an anatomically intact short-limb gastric bypass, of which the Fobi pouch operation (FPO) for obesity is a modification, are usually revised to a distal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (DRYGBP) to enhance weight loss. Method: A retrospective review of the charts of all patients who had a revision to a DRYGBP at our Center during an 8-year period was carried out and the findings analyzed. Results: 65 patients who had the FPO had a revision to the DRYGBP.Most were super obese patients who, even though they had lost significant weight, were still morbidly obese. Some were patients who had not lost adequate weight or <40% excess weight, and a small number were patients who requested more weight loss even though they had a BMI of < 35. 15 patients developed protein malnutrition requiring supplemental feeding. 6 required rerevision to short-limb gastric bypass. Conclusion: Revision of short-limb gastric bypass to DRYGBP usually enhances weight loss but at a cost of an increased incidence of protein malnutrition.     

MMPI-2 Scores in the Outcome Prediction of Gastric Bypass Surgery

Background: A psychological assessment is critical for morbidly obese patients seeking Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) surgery. The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) has been widely used in past psychological studies of bariatric surgery patients, but, to date, there is no published research on the more recent version of the MMPI, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI2), and its relation to RYGBP outcome.This investigation was designed to evaluate the predictive validity of the MMPI-2 with respect to outcome of RYGBP for morbid obesity. Methods: The research involved a retrospective analysis of MMPI-2 scores of 2 groups of patients 1 year following RYGBP: 1) those who lost ≥ 50% of their excess weight and 2) those who lost <50% of their excess weight. Subjects were 52 morbidly obese patients (mean age 44 years, mean BMI 56 kg/m2).The measurement of psychological variables consisted of the MMPI-2 scores of 3 validity scales, 10 clinical scales, and 3 Content Scales, and BMI. Results: Those who lost <50% excess weight scored significantly higher than those who lost >50% excess weight on the F,Hysteria, Paranoia, and Health Concerns scales of the MMPI-2, and significantly lower on the Masculinity-femininity scale. Stepwise regression analysis found that a combination of the Health Concerns and Masculinity-femininity scales was the most accurate predictor model for 1-year post-surgery weight loss. Conclusion: A standard personality measure, the MMPI-2, appears to be associated with weight loss outcome 1 year after RYGBP. Psychological traits such as anxiety and excessive health concerns are likely to influence bariatric surgical outcome.     

Excellent Weight Result after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Spite of Gastro-Gastric Fistula

A male patient (age 37 years, BMI 38 kg/m²) underwent a revisional gastric bypass after failed gastric banding. Unfortunately he developed a leak from the proximal pouch and subsequently a gastro-gastric fistula between the pouch and the main stomach. He recovered fully and could eat and drink without any restriction. Repeat examination with x-ray and endoscopy revealed that the fistula remained widely open. Remarkably, the patient lost weight to a BMI of 27 kg/m² (ie. lost 80% of his original excess body weight), thus challenging the widely held opinion that gastro-gastric fistulas inevitably lead to poor weight loss. In our patient the weight loss was stable for 2 years, when the fistula was closed surgically to avoid chronic proton pump inhibitor medication for stomal ulcer.     

A Functional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass to Avoid Gastric Exclusion: 1-Year Results

Background: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is rarely performed in Italy because it involves gastric exclusion. RYGBP with the stomach partitioned by an adjustable gastric band has been previously described. We have developed a functional RYGBP (FRYGBP) where an adjustable band allows access from a stapled gastric bypass pouch into the distal stomach. Methods: From October 2001 to May 2002, 16 patients underwent FRYGBP. A 30-cc vertical gastric pouch was fashioned by a 25-mm circular and 90-mm four-row stapler as in the Mason VBG. A hand-sewn retrocolic gastroenterostomy with 150-cm Roux and 30-cm afferent limbs completed the operation. The pouch outlet was encircled distal to the gastrojejunostomy by a non-inflated adjustable gastric band. The bands were inflated at 1 month during barium swallow, to demonstrate occlusion of the gastro-gastric outlet and patency of the gastrojejunostomy. Results: There was no operative mortality. After 1 year, mean percent excess BMI loss (%EBMIL) was 71.2 ± 16.2% (SD), and gastroscopy of the bypassed stomach was possible on 81% of the patients. There were three asymptomatic late complications (19%): two band erosions, converted to RYGBP, and one stenosis of the gastro-gastric outlet. Conclusion: FRYGBP thus far has been effective and allows the study of the excluded stomach. This ongoing study will undergo long-term evaluation.     

Pre- and Post-prandial Plasma Ghrelin Levels Do Not Correlate with Satiety or Failure to Achieve a Successful Outcome after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Background: We tested the hypothesis that the amount of weight lost after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) correlates with plasma ghrelin levels. Methods: 36 morbidly obese patients were studied 3 years after RYGBP (6 men, 30 women) with mean initial BMI 51 kg/m² and 8 healthy controls (2 men, 6 women) with mean BMI 25 kg/m². Subjects consumed a light breakfast, and the first blood sample was drawn at 1200 hrs immediately before lunch and the second sample at 1400 hrs. Satiety was assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Patients were stratified as success (current BMI <35) or failures (current BMI ≥35). Results: Plasma ghrelin levels were significantly lower in patients after RYGBP (269 ± 66 pcg/ml) compared with lean controls (616 ± 112 pcg/ml, P<0.001). Ghrelin levels pre or post meals were not different between patients who had a successful weight loss (preoperative BMI 47, current BMI 29, 72% EWL) or those who achieved a less then ideal weight loss (preoperative BMI 48, current BMI 41, 29% EWL). There was no correlation between any of the VAS scores and plasma ghrelin. There was a strong inverse correlation between pre-prandial ghrelin levels and the preoperative or current BMI. Conclusion: Failure to lose weight after RYGBP does not correlate with pre- or post-prandial ghrelin plasma levels. Ghrelin levels were inversely proportional to BMI and did not correlate with satiety. These data do not support a role for higher plasma ghrelin levels for inadequate weight loss after RYGBP.     

Comparison of Nutritional Consequences of Conventional Therapy of Obesity, Adjustable Gastric Banding, and Gastric Bypass

Background: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is more efficient than adjustable gastric banding (AGB) in weight loss and relieving co-morbidities, but nutritional complications of each surgical procedure have been poorly evaluated. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed to compare nutritional parameters in 201 consecutive obese patients, who had been treated either by conventional behavioral and dietary therapy (CT, n=110) or by bariatric surgery, including 51 AGB and 40 RYGBP. Results: BMI was similar after AGB (36.6 ± 5.3 kg/m²) and RYGBP (35.4 ± 6.3 kg/m²), but patients in the RYGBP group had lost more weight and had less metabolic disturbances than those in the AGB group. On the other hand, the prevalence of nutritional deficits was significantly higher in the RYGBP group than in the 2 other groups (P <0.01), whereas the AGB group did not differ from CT. Particularly, the RYGBP group presented an unexpected high frequency of deficiencies in fat-soluble vitamins. Moreover, vitamin B₁₂, hemoglobin, plasma prealbumin and creatinine concentrations were low in the RYGBP group. Conclusion: RYGBP is more efficient than AGB in correcting obesity, but this operation is associated with a higher frequency of nutritional deficits that should be carefully monitored.     

Adjustable Silicone Gastric Banding (ASGB): the Italian experience

Adjustable silicone gastric banding (ASGB) is a recently introduced gastric restrictive procedure. From April 1990 to April 1992, 85 patients underwent ASGB at our Department. Patients' characteristics were: 65 females, 20 males, mean age 39.6 years (range 17-60 years); body weight (BW) 127.9 ± 23 kg; % ideal body weight (%IBW) 205 ± 29; body mass index (BMI) 46 ± 7; morbidly obese 68, super-obese 17. Mean follow-up is 353 days. Twelve months after the operation BW was 95.2 ± 23 kg, % loss of excess BW 52.1 ± 22, and %IBW 152.2 ± 30 (45 patients). Mortality rate was zero and postoperative morbidity was insignificant. As late morbidity, we experienced two slippages of the band and six stoma-stenosis with pouch dilatation. Therefore, a surgical revision without removal of the band was performed in eight patients. The band was removed in one patient because of band erosion. In conclusion, ASGB is a safe and effective bariatric procedure. The weight loss is comparable to that produced by more extensive operations. Moreover, ASGB is fully reversible and adjustable to the patients' needs.     

Revisional Bariatric Surgery - Safe and Effective

Background: Revision operations have traditionally been considered difficult and associated with a high complication and long-term failure rate. This paper demonstrates that revision and/or conversions to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass are generally safe as well as effective in long-term weight maintenance and control of co-morbidities. Methods: A retrospective study from January 1989 through August 1999 was done involving 141 patients who had had various gastroplasty (118), gastric banding (6), jejunoileal bypass (3), or loop (2) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) procedures (12), with either technical failures or poor long-term maintained weight loss. Results:The demographics were: mean pre-operative weight at original surgery 264 lbs (120 kg); postop weight at a mean elapsed time since surgery of 5 years, 4 months: 188 lbs (85 kg), or a mean excess weight loss of 59%. The mean BMI dropped from a pre-op 45 to a post-op 31.There were 7 complications which required emergency surgery (5%), which included 4 leaks, 2 subphrenic abscesses, and 1 wound dehiscence. Other complications included 4 hernias, 3 staple-line failures, 1 transient renal failure, and 3 incidences of peptic ulcer disease requiring surgery, giving a total major complication rate of 13% in 17 patients, with no deaths. An earlier experience of this author comparing conversion RYGBP vs revision gastroplasty found better morbidity rates and weight loss with those converted to RYGBP. Conclusion: Converting failed gastric limiting and other bariatric procedures to RYGBP was safe and effective. Technical approaches to each problem type encountered are presented.     

Adjustable gastric banding as revisional bariatric procedure after failed gastric bypass—intermediate results

BackgroundAlthough gastric bypass is the most common bariatric procedure in the United States, it is has been associated with a failure rate of 15% (range 5–40%). The addition of an adjustable gastric band to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass has been reported to be a useful revision strategy in a small series of patients with inadequate weight loss after proximal gastric bypass.MethodsWe report on 22 patients who presented with inadequate weight loss or significant weight regain after proximal gastric bypass. All patients underwent revision with the placement of an adjustable silicone gastric band around the proximal gastric pouch. The bands were adjusted at 6 weeks postoperatively and beyond, as needed. Complications and weight loss at the most recent follow-up visit were evaluated.ResultsThe mean age and body mass index at revision was 41.27 years (range 25–58) and 44.8 ± 6.34 kg/m², respectively. Patients had experienced a loss of 19%, 27%, 47.3%, 42.3%, 43%, and 47% of their excess weight at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months after the revisional procedure, respectively. Three major complications occurred requiring reoperation. No band erosions have been documented.ConclusionThe results from this larger series of patients have also indicated that the addition of the adjustable silicone gastric band causes significant weight loss in patients with poor weight loss outcomes after gastric bypass. That no anastomosis or change in absorption is required makes this an attractive revisional strategy. As with all revisional procedures, the complication rates appear to be increased compared with a similar primary operation.     

Band Erosion after Laparoscopic Gastric Banding: Occurrence and Results after Conversion to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Background: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is a popular bariatric operation. Unfortunately, long-term complications such as slippage, infection, and intragastric migration (erosion) may occur. With erosion, band removal is mandatory. Options to prevent weight regain are delayed implantation of a new band, or conversion to another bariatric procedure such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) or biliopancreatic diversion. We present our experience with band erosion and immediate or delayed conversion to RYGBP. Methods: With a multidisciplinary team approach and prospective data collection, a comparison was made between patients with and without band erosion. The patients who were converted to RYGBP for band erosion were analyzed. Results: Gastric banding was performed on 347 patients between 1995 and 2002. Median follow-up is 52 months. Band erosion developed in 24 patients (6.8 %).The latter were heavier before gastric banding (BMI 45.9 vs 43.3, P <0,01). No band had ever been overinflated. Band erosion was diagnosed after a mean of 22.5 months (3-51). At time of diagnosis, mean BMI of 33.5 kg/m² (22.5-48) and average excess weight loss (EWL) of 52.9% (25-97) did not differ from that of the remaining patients at the respective time interval. The band was removed in all cases. Conversion to RYGBP was performed at the same time in 11, and a few months later in 2 patients. Operative morbidity included 1 leak (reoperation) and 4 wound infections. All but 1 patient lost further weight after reoperation, or at least maintained their weight. At last follow-up, mean EWL in relation to the pre-banding weight was 65.1%, and 69.2% of the patients had an EWL >50%, which compares favorably with the results obtained after primary RYGBP. Conclusions: In our series with a median follow-up >4 years, band erosion was more common than usually reported. Band removal with immediate or delayed conversion to RYGBP is feasible with an acceptable morbidity, and prevents weight regain in most cases. These results support further use of this approach for band erosion.     

The Magenstrasse and Mill Procedure can be Combined with a Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass to Produce Greater and Sustained Weight Loss

Background: The Magenstrasse and Mill operation (M&M) is effective in producing sustained weight loss and reducing obesity-related co-morbidity. It avoids the implantation of foreign material and is a more physiological procedure by maintaining normal gastric emptying. Side-effects are minimal and operative mortality is low. Satisfactory weight loss is seen at 1 year with 60% of excess weight lost. The present study compared weight loss produced by the combination of a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) with the standard M&M procedure. Methods: Between 1993 and 2001, 118 patients underwent surgery for the treatment of morbid obesity. 70 patients between 1993 and 1998 underwent only a M&M vertical gastric stapling, and 48 patients from 1998 underwent the M&M combined with a RYGBP. Results: Median follow-up for the M&M procedure was 36 months (range 1 to 72) and for the combined M & M and RYGBP was 30 months (range 1 to 48). At all time points following surgery, patients having a RYGBP performed in addition to the standard M&M procedure demonstrated a significantly greater amount of weight lost (P<0.0001, Mann-Whitney U-test) and overall percentage of excess weight lost (P<0.0001, Mann-Whitney U-test). Both groups had a significant reduction in BMI, although this was greater in the group that underwent the combined procedure at 3 years (P<0.001, sample t-test). Conclusions: A more rapid and prolonged weight loss was found when the M&M procedure was performed in combination with a RYGBP. This suggests that this combined procedure may be more beneficial when greater amounts of weight loss are needed in the super-obese.     

Early Results after Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass: EEA vs GIA Stapled Gastrojejunal Anastomosis

Background: Various surgical techniques have been successfully applied to isolated Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP). Many surgeons rely on stapling devices for the gastrojejunal (GJ) anastomosis. Early follow-up results were compared for two laparoscopic techniques for GJ anastomosis: circular end-to-end (EEA) and linear cutting (GIA) staplers. Methods: Medical charts were retrospectively reviewed of all patients who had undergone stapled GJ anastomosis for isolated RYGBP over a 2-year period. The jejunal limb used for GJ anastomosis was fashioned at 1 cm / unit body mass index (BMI). Patients were grouped by GJ anastomotic technique, EEA or GIA, and the results compared. Results: 61 patients underwent RYGBP (EEA=32; GIA=29), with no differences in preoperative BMI or co-morbidities. Mean (±SD) operative time was shorter for the GIA group (EEA=180±56.1 minutes; GIA=145.3±27.9 minutes, P=0.003). There were 2 early re-operations in the GIA group for anastomotic leaks. Postoperative complications were not statistically different; however, there was an increased incidence of wound infections in the EEA group vs the GIA group (21.9% vs 6.9%, P=0.08). Follow-up at 6-8 months revealed an average percent excess weight loss of 46.7%±12.2% for EEA and 51.4%±10.7% for GIA (P=0.25). Length of stay, total hospital costs and operating-room costs were similar (P=0.34, 0.53 and 0.96 respectively). Conclusion: Operative time was significantly shorter in the GIA group. Complications, length of stay, weight loss and costs were similar between the groups. Selection of anastomotic technique may be based on surgeon preference, operative time, and potential for serious complications.     

Impact of Patient Follow-Up on Weight Loss after Bariatric Surgery

Background: Postoperative follow-up after bariatric surgery is important. Because of the need for adjustments, follow-up after gastric banding may have a greater impact on weight loss than after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.We reviewed all patients at 1 year after these two operations. Methods: During the first year after surgery, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) patients were followed every 4 weeks and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) patients were followed at 3 weeks postoperatively and then every 3 months.The number of follow-up visits for each patient was calculated, and 50% compliance for follow-up and weight loss was compared. Results: Between October 2000 and September 2002, 216 LAGB and 139 RYGBP operations were performed. Of these patients, 186 LAGB patients and 115 RYGBP patients were available for 1-year follow-up. Age and BMI were similar for each group. Overall excess weight loss (EWL) after LAGB was 44.5%. 130 (70%) returned 6 or less times in the first year and achieved 42% EWL. 56 patients (30%) returned more than 6 times and had 50% EWL (P=0.005). Overall %EWL after RYGBP was 66.1%. 53 patients (46%) returned 3 or less times in the first year, achieving 66.1% EWL. 62 patients (54%) returned more than 3 times after surgery and achieved 67.6% EWL (P=NS). Conclusion: Patient follow-up plays a significant role in the amount of weight lost after LAGB, but not after RYGBP. Patient motivation and surgeon commitment for long-term follow-up is critical for successful weight loss after LAGB surgery.     

A Prospective Comparison of Vertical Banded Gastroplasty and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in a Non-Superobese Population

Background: In the non-superobese population, consensus is currently unavailable in bariatric surgery. We report the results of a prospective comparison of vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) in a non-superobese population. Methods: From 1994 to 2000, 179 patients with clinically severe obesity underwent various surgical procedures in our department. During this time a prospective study was undertaken in order to compare VBG with RYGBP in morbidly obese patients with a BMI <50 kg/m². Based on specific criteria including eating behavior, 68 patients were selected to undergo RYGBP and 35 VBG. All patients have undergone complete follow-up evaluation at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and every year thereafter. Results: All patients have now completed their 5th postoperative year. Mean follow-up period to date is 96.5±12.2 months for VBG and 67.6±11.3 months for RYGBP. 3 patients (8.6%) in the VBG group and 9 patients (13.2%) in the RYGBP group are lost to follow-up. Mean excess weight loss (EWL) was always better in the RYGBP group (P=0.0013). The percentage of failure, defined as EWL <25%, was not significantly different between the two procedures. No statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in the total number of non-metabolic complications, and the only statistically significant difference observed in metabolic complications was vitamin B₁₂ deficiency after RYGBP. Frequency of vomiting was significantly less and quality of eating significantly better in RYGBP than in VBG patients. Conclusion: This prospective long-term study, with nearly complete follow-up, suggests that in the non-superobese population, preoperative eating habits may play a role in choosing the most appropriate bariatric operation for each patient. Although RYGBP is associated with better mean weight loss outcomes, the percentage of patients who achieved and maintained ≥50% EWL after VBG in this pre-selected patient population was not significantly different. Each type of operation has advantages and disadvantages, and, if properly chosen, a purely restrictive procedure can be successful for some patients. Therefore, it can be said that the decision regarding which bariatric procedure to perform in non-superobese patients must be based on in-depth preoperative evaluation as well as the patients' own preferences and outcome expectations.