The effect of immunotherapy on nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness in bronchial asthma and allergic rhinitis

Allergen injection therapy may improve nonallergic bronchial hyperresponsiveness, but results at the moment are less than convincing. The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of immunotherapy on the degree of nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with allergic bronchial asthma (BA) and/or allergic rhinitis (AR). Methacholine challenge bronchial provocation test, allergic skin test, serum IgE and peripheral blood eosinophil counts were performed before and after 12 months or more of immunotherapy. The improved group, as determined by a shift of at least two doubling concentrations of methacholine, was 75% of AR (n=16), 41.7% of BA (n=24) and 53.8% of BA+ AR (n=13). The geometric mean of the methacholine provocational concentration (PC20) changed from 3.40 to 14.36 mg/ml (P <0.05) in AR, from 0.73 to 1.04 mg/ml in BA (not significant), and from 1.43 to 5.07 mg/ml (P <0.05) in BA+ AR. In conclusion, nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness was improved by immunotherapy in three quarters of the allergic rhinitis cases and in about a half of the allergic bronchial asthma patients, which suggests that immunotherapy might be helpful at preventing the development of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in allergic rhinitis patients, and that it does not improve bronchial hyperresponsiveness in about a half of allergic bronchial asthma patients.     

Comparison of deltaFVC between patients with allergic rhinitis with airway hypersensitivity and patients with mild asthma.

BACKGROUND: In asthmatic individuals, airway sensitivity and maximal airway response are increased. Airway sensitivity is usually evaluated by measuring the provocation concentration of inhaled methacholine or histamine that causes a decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 20% (PC20). The percentage decrease in forced vital capacity at the PC20 (deltaFVC) has been proposed as a surrogate marker for maximal airway response. Individuals with allergic rhinitis and no clinical evidence of asthma frequently exhibit airway hypersensitivity. OBJECTIVE: To compare the deltaFVC between patients with allergic rhinitis and mild asthmatic patients with a similar degree of airway hypersensitivity. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of methacholine challenge test data from 72 children with allergic rhinitis and airway hypersensitivity (methacholine PC20 < 16 mg/mL) (rhinitis group) and from 72 children with mild atopic asthma matched to the rhinitis group regarding the methacholine PC20 (asthma group). The deltaFVC was calculated on the concentration-response curve to methacholine. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD deltaFVC was significantly lower in the rhinitis group (15.0% +/- 3.6%) vs the asthma group (17.4% +/- 5.3%) (P = .002). There was no significant correlation between the deltaFVC and PC20 in the rhinitis (r = -0.101; P = .41) and asthma (r = -0.023; P = .85) groups when 2 patients with PC20 less than 1 mg/mL were excluded from each group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with allergic rhinitis and airway hypersensitivity had a significantly lower deltaFVC than methacholine PC20-matched mild asthmatic patients, suggesting that the level of maximal airway response in patients with allergic rhinitis is lower than that in mild asthmatic patients with a similar degree of airway hypersensitivity.     

Nasal eosinophilic inflammation contributes to bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with allergic rhinitis

There are increasing evidences that allergic rhinitis (AR) may influence the clinical course of asthma. We conducted methacholine challenge test and nasal eosinophils on nasal smear to patients with allergic rhinitis in order to investigate the mechanism of connecting upper and lower airway inflammation in 35 patients with AR during exacerbation. The methacholine concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) was used as thresholds of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). Thresholds of 25 mg/dL or less were assumed to indicate BHR. All patients had normal pulmonary function. Significant differences in BHR were detected in the comparison of patients with cough or postnasal drip and without cough or postnasal drip. There were significant differences of PC20 between patients with cough or postnasal drip and those without cough or postnasal drip (3.41+/-3.59 mg/mL vs 10.2+/-1.2 mg/mL, p=0.001). The levels of total IgE were higher in patients with seasonal AR than in patients with perennial AR with exacerbation (472.5+/-132.5 IU/L vs. 389.0+/-70.9 IU/L, p<0.05). Nasal eosinophils were closely related to log PC20 (r=-0.65, p<0.01). These findings demonstrated that nasal eosinophilic inflammation might contribute to BHR in patients with AR.     

The prevalence of allergic disease and IgE antibodies to house dust mite In schoolchildren in Taiwan

The prevalence of positive specific IgE antibodies to house dust mites (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus; D. farinae) was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 5097 (61%) volunteers of 8345 schoolchildren aged between 7 and 14 yr from two government schools. All of them filled out a questionnaire concerning allergic symptoms. Among them, 412 (8.1%) children showed a positive reaction to at least one of the two mite allergens, the range varying between 5.6 and 11.2% according to the child's age. Boys had higher prevalence of positive mite specific IgE than girls (9.8% vs. 6.4%, P less than 0.01), with the overall male to female ratio 1.5:1. The prevalence of bronchial asthma in boys and girls was 5.3% and 3.3% respectively. The positive mite specific IgE antibody in children with asthma and allergic rhinitis was 52% (103 of 198) and 28.7% (193 of 673) respectively. The mean levels of mite specific IgE were not significantly related to the age of onset and severity of asthmatic symptoms (P greater than 0.1), but were significantly different among subjects with current and past asthma (P less than 0.001). It is suggested that the mite-specific IgE may play a role in the pathogenesis of bronchial asthma in children.     

Relationship between nasal and bronchial responsiveness in perennial allergic rhinitic patients with asthma

BACKGROUND: The nasal and bronchial mucosa present similarities and most patients with asthma also have rhinitis, suggesting the concept of 'one airway one disease'. Although many studies may suggest the relationship between nasal and bronchial responsiveness in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma, few studies have been published which address this question directly. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the relationship between nonspecific nasal and bronchial responsiveness exists in perennial allergic rhinitic patients with asthma. METHODS: Fifty-one perennial allergic rhinitic patients with the definitive or suspected asthma underwent methacholine bronchial provocation tests and nasal histamine challenge tests. A slope of the absolute changes in nasal symptoms score/log concentrations of histamine was calculated by linear regression analysis. A ratio of the final absolute change in nasal symptoms score to the sum of all the doses of histamine given to the subject was also calculated. The degree of bronchial responsiveness to methacholine was categorized as positive bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) if PC(20) (provocative concentration of methacholine resulting in 20% fall in FEV(1)) was <4 mg/ml, borderline BHR if PC(20) was >or=4 but 16 mg/ml. Another index of bronchial responsiveness (BRindex) was calculated as the log [(% decline in FEV(1)/log final methacholine concentration as mg/dl) + 10]. RESULTS: The geometric means of the slope (4.47 vs. 2.95, p < 0.05) and the ratio (1.68 vs. 0.54, p < 0.01) were higher in patients with positive BHR (n = 23) than in patients with negative BHR (n = 19), respectively. The geometric means of the slope (3.50) and the ratio (1.13) in patients with borderline BHR (n = 9) were between the two groups, respectively. In all patients, the log-slope (r = 0.48, p < 0.001) and the log-ratio (r = 0.51, p < 0.001) were correlated well with the BRindex, respectively. Even in allergic rhinitic patients with definitive asthma, the log-slope was correlated with the BRindex (r = 0.39, p < 0.05) or log-PC(20) (r = -0.36, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The nonspecific nasal responsiveness may be related to the nonspecific bronchial responsiveness in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma, which may support the viewpoint that allergic rhinitis and asthma represent a continuum of inflammation involving one common airway.     

The investigation of asthmatic children by multiple factor analysis. II. The influence of 17 allergic factors on atopic dermatitis and allergic rhinitis in asthmatic children

We investigated possible influence of 17 allergy-associated factors on atopic dermatitis and allergic rhinitis using Multiple factor analysis in 150 asthmatic children. Atopic dermatitis was complicated in ninety-seven cases and allergic rhinitis in ninety-seven cases. 17 allergy-associated factors were as follows: 1) sex, 2) age, 3) onset age of asthma, 4) family history of allergy, 5) peripheral eosinophil counts, 6) IgE RIST, 7) IgE RAST score to egg white, 8) IgE RAST score to milk, 9) IgE RAST score to soybean, 10) IgG4 antibody titers to egg white, 11) IgG4 antibody titers to milk, 12) IgG4 antibody titers to soybean, 13) IgE RAST score to house dust, 14) IgE RAST score to Dermatophagoides farinae, 15) severity of asthma, 16) exercise-induced asthma, 17) atopic dermatitis or allergic rhinitis. We concluded as follows: 1) Factors which more strongly influenced both atopic dermatitis and allergic rhinitis were IgE RAST score to D.f., positive family history of allergy, IgE RIST and eosinophil counts. 2) Combination with high levels of IgG4 antibody to 3 food allergens such as egg-white, milk and soybean and IgE RAST to egg-white has a strong influence on atopic dermatitis, but high levels of IgG4 antibody to 3 food allergens except high level of IgG4 antibody to soybean have a weak influence on allergic rhinitis.     

The importance of maximal airway response to methacholine in the prediction of asthma development in patients with allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis is a known predictor and correlate of asthma incidence. However, it is not clear which patients with allergic rhinitis are at greater risk of the development of asthma. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether airway hypersensitivity and/or increased maximal response on the dose-response curve to methacholine would predict the development of asthma in subjects with allergic rhinitis. METHODS: One hundred and forty-one children with allergic rhinitis were prospectively studied for 7 years. At the initiation of the study, bronchial provocation test with methacholine using a stepwise increasing concentration technique was performed to measure PC(20) (provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV(1)) and maximal response. Each subject was evaluated at least every 6 months and details of asthmatic symptoms or signs experienced during the intervening period were taken. RESULTS: Twenty of 122 subjects available for the follow-up developed asthma. Nine (19.6%) of 46 hypersensitive (PC(20) < 18 mg/mL) subjects developed asthma, compared with 11 (14.5%) of 76 normosensitive subjects (P = 0.462). Eight (32%) of 25 subjects without maximal response plateau developed asthma, compared with 12 (12.4%) of 97 subjects with maximal response plateau (P = 0.018). Score test for trend revealed a significant association between the level of maximal response (P = 0.007), but not the degree of methacholine PC(20) (P = 0.123), and the future development of asthma. CONCLUSION: An increased maximal airway response to methacholine is shown to be a better predictor for the future development of asthma in patients with allergic rhinitis, than airway hypersensitivity to methacholine.     

The determinants of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with allergic rhinitis and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) may be at higher risk of developing asthma. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether reactivity to aeroallergens in skin prick testing (SPT) and serum eosinophil cationic protein levels can be used to predict BHR in allergic rhinitis patients. METHODS: Fifty-nine consecutive patients with allergic rhinitis underwent SPTs using grass, tree, weed, parietaria, Alternaria, Aspergillus, mites, and cat and dog dander extracts. Methacholine challenge tests were performed using spirometry. RESULTS: Methacholine-induced BHR was detected in 23 patients (39%). Of 59 patients, 14 had 1 positive SPT response, 35 had 2 to 4 positive responses, and 10 had more than 4 positive responses. There was a significant inverse correlation between methacholine provocation concentration that caused a decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 20% (PC20) and the number of positive SPT responses (r = -0.28; P = .03). The BHR-positive patients had a mean of 4 positive SPT responses, whereas BHR-negative patients had a mean of 2.6 (P = .04). Nine BHR-positive patients (39%) and only 1 BHR-negative patient (3%) had more than 4 positive SPT responses (P < .001). There was no correlation between serum eosinophil cationic protein levels and methacholine PC20 doses. There was a strong association between hyperresponsiveness to methacholine and both cat and dog dander sensitivity (P < .001 and P = .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Allergic rhinitis patients with SPT responses to a higher number of allergens are more likely to have BHR. Whether the number of positive SPT responses correlates with the risk of developing asthma in allergic rhinitis patients remains to be determined.     

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness in young children with allergic rhinitis and its risk factors

BACKGROUND: Subjects with allergic rhinitis but no clinical evidence of asthma have greater bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), and several factors have been implicated as its determinants. However, studies in young children are lacking. The aims of this study were to evaluate the prevalence of BHR in young children with allergic rhinitis and to investigate its risk factors. METHODS: Methacholine bronchial challenges were performed in 4- to 6-year-old nonasthmatic children with allergic rhinitis (n = 83) and in healthy nonatopic controls (n = 32), using a modified auscultation method. The end-point was defined as the appearance of wheezing and/or oxygen desaturation. Subjects were considered to have BHR when they had end-point concentrations of methacholine 相似文献   

Sensitivity and maximal response to methacholine in perennial and seasonal allergic rhinitis

Background Airway hyperresponsiveness to pharmacological agonists is a common feature in subjects with allergic rhinitis.
Objective The aim of this study was to investigate differences in threshold value and shape of the concentration-response curves to methacholine between subjects with perennial allergic rhinitis and subjects with seasonal rhinitis.
Methods We studied a sample of 72 non-asthmatic patients with allergic rhinitis. They were subdivided into two groups: subjects with only seasonal symptoms and skin sensitization to grass and/or Parietaria pollen allergens (seasonal group, n = 38), and subjects with perennial symptoms and skin sensitization to house dust mite, alone or with other allergens (perennial group, n = 34). They were challenged with methacholine (up to 200mg/mL), and concentration-response curves were characterized by the threshold value (PC₂₀= provocative concentration of methacholine required to produce a 20% fall in FEV₁) and maximal response plateau, if possible. The measurements in the seasonal group were done within the pollen season.
Results The geometric mean methacholine PC₂₀ for subjects of the perennial group was 6.9mg/mL, compared with 23.4mg/mL in subjects of the seasonal group ( P 0.01). A plateau response was detected in 16 subjects of the perennial group and in 28 subjects of the seasonal group (p 0.05). Moreover, the level of plateau was higher in subjects of the perennial group when compared with subjects of the seasonal group (23.8 ±2.0% vs 19.2 ±1.6%, P 0.05).
Conclusion In subjects with allergic rhinitis, sensitization to perennial allergens is associated not only with lower methacholine threshold values, but also with lower prevalence and higher level of plateau than sensitization to pollen allergens.     

Prevalence of serum IgE antibodies to the Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins (SAE, SEB, SEC, SED, TSST-1) in patients with persistent allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: Enterotoxins produced by Staphylococcus aureus and their specific IgE antibodies were thought to be important in worsening atopic dermatitis. However, few studies have documented an association between S. aureus or its exotoxins and exacerbations of upper airway/nasal disease. In the current study, we determined the prevalence of serum-specific IgE towards staphylococcal enterotoxin A, B, C, D (SEA, SEB, SEC, SED) and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 (TSST-1) in patients suffering from rhinitis and/or asthma due to allergy. Therefore, we examined whether SEA, SEB, SEC, SED and TSST-1 were important in worsening the clinical status of patients allergic to house dust mites by means of assessing serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), which is thought to be a reliable marker of asthma and rhinitis severity. METHODS: 198 patients with persistent allergic rhinitis and/or asthma due to house dust mites were evaluated. Specific IgE towards SEA, SEB, SEC, SED, TSST-1, timothy grass and birch pollen recombinant allergens, and other aeroallergen extracts from common allergen sources were evaluated by the Pharmacia CAP System. Serum ECP was assessed, too. RESULTS: The percentages of sensitization to staphylococcal enterotoxins of 198 house dust mite-allergic patients were as follows: TSST-1-specific IgE 24.7% (n=49), SEC-specific IgE 22.2% (n=44), SEB-specific IgE 15.1% (n=30), SEA-specific IgE 9.1% (n=18), and SED-specific IgE 5.5% (n=11). Out of 198 individuals allergic to house dust mites 136 patients suffering from persistent rhinitis were subdivided into two subgroups: 53 patients with serum-specific IgE to at least one staphylococcal enterotoxin and 83 patients without specific IgE towards staphylococcal enterotoxins. Patients sensitive to staphylococcal enterotoxins had higher serum ECP levels than patients lacking specific IgE to SEA, SEB, SEC, SED and TSST-1(geometric mean 24.3 vs. 16.6 microg/100 ml; p=0.029), as well as total IgE levels (geometric mean 564 vs. 161 kU/l, p=0.00063) and specific IgE to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (geometric mean 16.7 vs. 6.6 kU/l; p=0.0235) and Dermatophagoides farinae (geometric mean 18.6 vs. 7.8 kU/l; p=0.0246). CONCLUSION: A status of sensitization to staphylococcal enterotoxins seems to be a factor increasing serum ECP, which is thought to be a reliable marker of clinical severity of allergic disease. Therefore, the evaluation of SEA, SEB, SEC, SED and TSST-1-specific IgE antibodies may have additional significance for the prognosis of persistent allergic diseases of the upper airway.     

Citrus red mite (Panonychus citri) is the most common sensitizing allergen of asthma and rhinitis in citrus farmers.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate type I hypersensitivity to citrus red mite (Panonychus citri), its prevalence, and relationship to respiratory dysfunction, a cross-sectional survey was performed among citrus farmers on Cheju Island, Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Questionnaires, and skin prick test responses to 11 common inhalant allergens and citrus red mite were performed in 181 citrus farmers, and serum-specific IgE antibodies to citrus red mite were measured by ELISA in sera of 123 subjects. To determine airway hyperresponsiveness, methacholine bronchial provocation tests were performed in 55 subjects who complained of recurrent lower respiratory symptoms. RESULTS: The prevalence of asthma-based on presence of asthmatic symptoms on the questionnaire and airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine, and allergic rhinitis based on presence of nasal symptoms on the questionnaire and positive skin-test response were 12.1% and 19.3%, respectively. The positive rate of skin responses to one or more of 11 common inhalant allergens excluding citrus red mite was 17.1%, and if citrus red mite was included, 25.9% of farmers had positive responses. On skin prick tests, citrus red mite (16.5%) was the most common sensitizing allergen, followed by cockroach (11.0%), Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (9.9%), and D. farinae (9.3%). Among farmers with asthma and allergic rhinitis, the positive skin responses to citrus red mite were noted in 54.5 and 68.5%, respectively. Serum-specific IgE antibodies to citrus red mite were detected in 45 farmers (36. 5%) of the 123 tested, and there was significant correlation between specific IgE level and weal (A/H ratio) to citrus red mite (r = 0.57, P < 0.001). The prevalence of asthma was higher in subjects with positive skin responses or high serum-specific IgE antibodies to citrus red mite than in those without skin response or serum specific IgE (P < 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION: Citrus red mite is the most important allergen in citrus farmers with asthma and rhinitis in which causative allergen has not been identified. It should be included in the skin test battery for screening the causative allergen in farmers exposed to citrus red mite.     

Nasal beclomethasone prevents the seasonal increase in bronchial responsiveness in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma.

Experimental studies have demonstrated that induction of a nasal allergic reaction can lead to an increase in bronchial responsiveness (BR). To assess the clinical relevance of these experimental changes to chronic asthma, we sought to determine the effect of nasal beclomethasone dipropionate (Bdp) on BR in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and asthma. Eighteen subjects with histories of seasonal allergic rhinitis and asthma during the fall pollen season with positive skin tests to short ragweed and bronchial hyperresponsiveness to inhaled methacholine were assigned to receive either nasal Bdp (336 micrograms/day) or placebo for the entire ragweed season. Patients recorded daily nasal and chest symptoms, nasal blockage index, oral peak expiratory flow rates, and supplemental medication use. BR to methacholine was measured during the baseline period and 6 weeks into the ragweed season. Although the Bdp group did have a significant improvement in nasal blockage index, there was no improvement in daily asthma symptom scores, oral peak expiratory flow, or asthma medication use. However, subjects treated with Bdp were protected from the increase in BR seen in the placebo group (geometric mean PC20 placebo group: baseline = 0.70, week 6 = 0.29; Bdp group: baseline = 0.80, week 6 = 0.93; intergroup difference, p = 0.022). We conclude that nasal corticosteroid therapy can prevent the increase in BR associated with seasonal pollen exposure in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma.     

The relationship between seroatopy and symptoms of either allergic rhinitis or asthma

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic data on allergic rhinitis and asthma are frequently based on self-reported symptoms. OBJECTIVE: This cross-sectional study examined the relationship between self-reported symptoms and histories of allergic rhinitis or asthma and a marker of allergic sensitization, allergen-specific IgE. METHODS: We surveyed 702 pregnant women in Michigan. Blood samples were analyzed for specific IgE to 9 allergens: dust mites (Dermatophagoides farinae and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus), cat, dog, cockroach, ragweed, timothy grass, egg, and Alternaria alternata. Seratopy was defined as a specific IgE greater than or equal to 0.35 kU/L to any allergen. RESULTS: Seroatopy was found in 66.7% of those with hay fever symptoms, 68.3% with a physician's diagnosis of asthma, and 72.1% of those with both conditions. These results differed significantly from asymptomatic subjects, where 49.8% of patients without hay fever and 50.4% without asthma were seroatopic. Race and education did not modify the relationships. Symptoms related to specific exposures were modest predictors of positive specific IgE to related allergens (positive predictive values from 26.5% to 50.3%). CONCLUSION: Self-reported symptoms of allergic rhinitis or asthma were significantly associated with allergic sensitization, but the odds ratios were of relatively low magnitude for this historical information to be considered evidence of current allergic sensitization. A 66% to 68% probability existed that those with symptoms of allergic rhinitis or asthma would have a positive specific IgE test. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Self-reported histories of hay fever or asthma alone are only modest predictors of allergic sensitization. When knowledge of allergic sensitization is important, information beyond self-reported symptoms is necessary.     

Evaluation of the sensitized condition of patients with allergic diseases in Okinawa using the MAST allergy system]

We determined, using the MAST system, specific IgE antibodies to allergens in the circulating blood of 127 patients with bronchial asthma, allergic rhinitis and atopic dermatitis in Okinawa. The positive rates to inhalant allergens in all patients examined by the MAST system were as follows: Dermatophagoides farinae 65%, house dust 58%, cat epithelium 17% and Japanese cedar 9%. In addition, the positive rates to food allergens found in all patients were as follows: wheat 16%, shrimp 14%, egg white, rice and crab 12%. The average number of positive allergens in the patients with atopic dermatitis was larger than that in those with allergic respiratory diseases only. The above five specific IgE antibodies were detected simultaneously in 12 (9%) of the 127 patients. In addition, the average number of overlapping positive allergens was 2.0 in all patients. From these results, it was suggested that the number of overlapping positive allergens in patients on Okinawa is smaller than in other areas of Japan as compared with other papers.     

Comparison of the efficacy of subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy in mite-sensitive patients with rhinitis and asthma--a placebo controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of therapy with sublingual allergen extracts is unproven. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical and immunologic outcome of sublingual immunotherapy and to compare the results with subcutaneous immunotherapy and placebo in 36 patients with rhinitis and asthma due to mite allergy. METHOD: Thirty-six patients with rhinitis and asthma due to mite allergy were randomly divided into three groups in order to receive subcutaneous injections with allergenic extracts, sublingual drops with solutions of purified standardized allergen preparations, or sublingual placebo for a period of 1 year. Assessment of clinical and immunologic efficacy included symptom and medication scores, methacholine provocation tests, skin prick tests, and specific IgE and IgG4 antibody concentrations. RESULTS: Subcutaneous immunotherapy for both rhinitis and asthma was clinically effective. Patients treated with sublingual immunotherapy had decreased rhinitis symptoms (P < .01) but no change in asthma scores. Medication scores significantly decreased in both actively treated groups (P < .01) at the first year compared with baseline. When skin prick tests were evaluated, the subcutaneously treated group had a significant decrease in the wheal diameter of D. pteronyssinus (P < .01), D. farinae (P < .05), and histamine (P < .05) while other two groups showed no difference. There was no significant change in methacholine PC20 values in all groups at the end of the first year when compared with baseline. No change in D. pteronyssinus and D. farinae specific IgE levels were observed; however, specific IgG4 concentrations were significantly higher than baseline both in sublingual and subcutaneous immunotherapy groups (P < .05) after 1 year immunotherapy. No significant difference was obtained in any of these parameters in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: Sublingual immunotherapy may be effective in patients with allergic rhinitis. Further, we believe it is a potential therapy for allergic asthmatic patients. The clinical usefulness of this form of immunotherapy (when administered to larger study groups for a longer time) and the mechanisms underlying its immunologic effect deserve additional studies.     

Precipitating factors in respiratory allergic disease in Indonesian children

Skin test results and IgE antibody levels measured by RAST indicate that hyper-sensitivity to house dust mite (D. pteronyssinus) is a major feature of asthma and allergic rhinitis in Indonesian children. Total serum IgE levels were higher in the allergic than in control children. 60% (twenty-one out of thirty-five) of the asthmatic children and 56% (five out of nine) of the children with allergic rhinitis had IgE antibodies to the helminth Ascaris lumbricoides compared with none out of four control children. A tendency was found for high IgE antibody levels to D. pteronyssinus to occur in association with low IgE antibody levels to A. lumbricoides and vice versa.     

The Canadian Childhood Asthma Primary Prevention Study: outcomes at 7 years of age

BACKGROUND: Avoidance of any one of the individual risk factors associated with childhood asthma has not been successful in preventing its development. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention program for the primary prevention of asthma in high-risk infants at 7 years of age. METHODS: Five hundred forty-five high-risk infants with an immediate family history of asthma and allergies were prospectively randomized into intervention or control groups prenatally. Intervention measures introduced before birth and during the first year of life included avoidance of house dust, pets, and environmental tobacco smoke and encouragement of breast-feeding with delayed introduction of solid foods. Assessment of outcomes at 7 years consisted of examination by pediatric allergists, methacholine inhalation tests, and allergy skin tests. RESULTS: At 7 years, 469 of the 545 children were contacted, and 380 returned for further assessment. The prevalence of pediatric allergist-diagnosed asthma was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group (14.9% vs 23.0%; adjusted risk ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.25-0.79). The prevalence of allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, atopy (defined as positive skin test reactions to any common allergen), and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (defined as the provocative concentration of methacholine that induced a 20% decrease in FEV 1 from a postsaline value of less than 7.8 mg/mL) were not significantly different between the 2 groups. The prevalence of asthma (defined as wheeze without colds and the presence of bronchial hyperresponsiveness) was also significantly lower in the intervention group compared with the control group (12.9% vs 25.0%; adjusted risk ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.22-0.71). CONCLUSION: The multifaceted intervention program was effective in reducing the prevalence of asthma in high-risk children at 7 years of age.     

Exhaled nitric oxide is associated with allergic inflammation in children

Exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) has been proposed as a noninvasive marker of airway inflammation in asthma. In asthmatic patients, exhaled NO levels have been shown to relate with other markers of eosinophilic recruitment, which are detected in blood, sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and bronchial biopsy samples. The purpose of this study was to assess the possible relationship between eNO and allergic inflammation or sensitization in childhood asthma and allergic rhinitis. Subjects consisted of 118 asthmatic children, 79 patients with allergic rhinitis, and 74 controls. Their age ranged from 6 to 15 yr old. eNO level, peripheral blood eosinophil count, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), serum total IgE level and specific IgE levels were measured. Methacholine challenge test and allergic skin prick test for common allergens were performed in all subjects. Atopic group (n = 206, 44.48 ± 30.45 ppb) had higher eNO values than non-atopic group (n = 65, 20.54 ± 16.57 ppb, P < 0.001). eNO level was significantly higher in patients with asthma (42.84 ± 31.92 ppb) and in those with allergic rhinitis (43.59 ± 29.84 ppb) than in healthy controls (27.01 ± 21.34 ppb, P < 0.001) but there was no difference between asthma and allergic rhinitis group. eNO also had significant positive correlations with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus IgE level (r = 0.348, P < 0.001), Dermatophagoides farinae IgE level (r = 0.376, P < 0.001), and the number of positive allergens in skin prick test (r = 0.329, P = 0.001). eNO had significant positive correlations with peripheral blood eosinophil count (r = 0.356, P < 0.001), serum total IgE level (r = 0.221, P < 0.001), and ECP (r = 0.436, P < 0.001). This study reveals that eNO level is associated with allergic inflammation and the degree of allergic sensitization.     

Asymptomatic bronchial hyperresponsiveness in rhinitis

Methacholine inhalation tests are used to help in the diagnosis of asthma when spirometry is normal. However, the significance of increased methacholine responsiveness in patients with rhinitis and no symptoms of asthma is not known. One possibility is that it is a false positive result; another possibility is that it indicates subclinical asthma. We investigated these possibilities in 25 patients with rhinitis, whose attending physician had not made a diagnosis of asthma, by comparing responsiveness to methacholine expressed as the provocation concentration to cause a fall in FEV1 of 20% (PC20) with responsiveness to the natural stimulus of isocapnic hyperventilation of cold air and the diurnal variation of peak flow rate. Asthma was recognized objectively by variable airflow obstruction documented by one of the latter two tests. The PC20 ranged between 4 and greater than 64 mg/ml. In 10 patients the PC20 was less than 16 mg/ml. Five of these patients had bronchoconstriction in response to hyperventilation, and a further two patients demonstrated increased variability of peak flow rates. Thus, in seven of 10 patients, increased bronchial responsiveness was confirmed by the use of two different methods, although they were asymptomatic, and the increased response to methacholine was not a false positive result. In the remaining three patients the PC20 was borderline increased (8 to 16 mg/ml). The results indicate that methacholine responsiveness in the asthmatic range in patients with rhinitis is associated with variable airflow obstruction and subclinical asthma.