Neoral rescue therapy in transplant patients with intolerance to tacrolimus

BACKGROUND: The calcineurin inhibitors, cyclosporine and tacrolimus, are the mainstay of current immunosuppressive regimens for the prevention of acute rejection in organ transplantation. The choice of the individual agent used often depends on the preference of the Transplant Center and patient type. Adverse effects associated with tacrolimus may impact its clinical utility in many patients. This study characterizes the clinical outcomes of transplant recipients who experienced adverse effects from tacrolimus and were converted to cyclosporine-microemulsion-based (Neoral([cyclosporine, USP] MODIFIED) therapy. METHODS: Hepatic or renal allograft recipients unable to maintain adequate immunosuppression with a tacrolimus-based regimen for reasons of toxicity or efficacy were recruited for this study and converted to cyclosporine-microemulsion-based therapy. Data were collected on drug dosing, trough concentrations, and treatment duration, as well as detailed information on tacrolimus-associated toxicities that prompted rescue with cyclosporine-microemulsion. Furthermore, clinical and laboratory data related to the clinical course of the patients after conversion to cyclosporine-microemulsion were recorded for up to 1 yr following conversion. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-seven transplant recipients were enrolled in this study. Predominant reasons for discontinuation of tacrolimus were neurotoxicity (55%), diabetes (24%), nephrotoxicity (15%), and gastrointestinal intolerance (24%). Patients frequently had multiple symptoms prompting rescue therapy with cyclosporine-microemulsion. Over 70% of subjects had improvement or resolution of their tacrolimus-associated adverse symptoms within 3 months post-conversion. Acute rejection episodes occurred in 27% of patients converted to cyclosporine-microemulsion. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclosporine-microemulsion rescue therapy in patients experiencing adverse clinical effects associated with tacrolimus is an effective treatment option which leads to resolution of these adverse effects in the majority of patients, and allows for satisfactory clinical outcomes.     

Long term efficacy of simvastatin in renal transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine or tacrolimus

BACKGROUND: Hyperlipidemia is frequently developed following renal transplantation and results in worsening of the patient's prognosis. METHODS: In this study, 14 patients who had hypercholesterolemia [total cholesterol (TC) >200 mg/dL] and hypertriglyceridemia [triglyceride (TG) >150 mg/dL] 1 month after renal transplantation (post-transplantation), seven patients each under the treatment with immunosuppressant, either cyclosporine or tacrolimus started simvastatin treatment of 5-10 mg/d and continued the treatment for 4 yr. The effect of simvastatin treatment was assessed by comparison in serum lipid levels (TC, TG, cholesterol in lipoprotein fractions, and apolipoproteins) and the lipid metabolism related enzyme activities for post-transplantation, after 6-month and 4-yr simvastatin treatment. RESULTS: Simvastatin treatment of 4 yr significantly decreased the elevated levels of serum TC from 234.5 +/- 30.8 to 186.3 +/- 20.5 mg/dL (p < 0.001), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from 116.7 +/- 22.5 to 82.7 +/- 16.6 mg/dL (p < 0.05) and TG from 200.3 +/- 109.2 to 97.0 +/- 45.2 mg/dL (p < 0.001). In addition, there were significant decreases in elevated serum very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C) from 47.8 +/- 18.4 to 28.6 +/- 9.5 mg/dL (p < 0.001) and LDL2 cholesterol (LDL2-C) from 20.8 +/- 8.2 to 5.7 +/- 1.8 mg/dL (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that 4-yr treatment of simvastatin improves profiles of the atherogenic lipids in renal transplant patients with immunosuppressant caused hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia treated either cyclosporine or tacrolimus in similar manner.     

Renal function in patients with cadaveric kidney transplants treated with tacrolimus or cyclosporine

INTRODUCTION: Renal function predicts graft survival in kidney transplant patients. This study compared the 2-year evolution of renal function in patients treated with cyclosporine or tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and prednisone. METHODS: We studied 1558 cadaveric renal transplant recipients from 14 Spanish hospitals between January 2000 and December 2002. Of these, 1168 were treated with tacrolimus and 390 with cyclosporine. The primary efficacy endpoint was long-term renal function. Renal function was measured by serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by creatinine clearance calculated from the Cockcroft-Gault formula. This report summarizes the 2-year results. RESULTS: At 24 months the tacrolimus group showed significantly better serum creatinine (1.5 +/- 0.7 vs 1.8 +/- 0.8 mg/dL, P < .001) and GFR (60.5 +/- 20.9 mL/min vs 47.9 +/- 10.0, P < .001) than the cyclosporine group. Additionally, recipients with ideal graft donors (23.5 +/- 2.8 vs 24.0 +/- 2.9 years) had a better serum creatinine at 2 years (1.23 +/- 0.2 vs 1.5 +/- 0.4 mg/dL, P < .05). Multivariate analysis showed that tacrolimus was an independent factor associated with better renal function: odds ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval (1.2 to 2.2), P < .001. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a renal transplant treated with tacrolimus in combination with MMF and prednisone displayed better renal function at 2 years than those who received cyclosporine.     

Paired kidney analysis of tacrolimus and cyclosporine microemulsion-based therapy in Chinese cadaveric renal transplant recipients

Few studies used paired kidneys for comparison between tacrolimus and cyclosporine in renal transplantation. Most of the published data used whole blood trough levels for drug monitoring. However, the use of limited sampling strategy and abbreviated formula to estimate the 12-h area under concentration-time curve (AUC(0-12)) allowed better prediction of drug exposure. Sixty-six first cadaveric renal transplant recipients receiving paired kidneys were randomized to receive either tacrolimus-based (n = 33) or cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral)-based therapies (n = 33). Abbreviated AUC(0-12) was used for drug monitoring and dose titration. Mean follow-up duration was 2.8 +/- 2 years. The patient and graft survival were comparable. Fewer incidence of acute rejection was observed in tacrolimus group (15% vs. 27.3%) though the difference was not significant (P = 0.23). The absolute value and the rate of decline of creatinine clearance were both significantly better in tacrolimus-treated patients. Prevalence of hypertension, post-transplant diabetes mellitus, infection, and malignancy were similar in both groups. Prevalence of hypercholesterolemia (11/33 vs. 4/33) and gum hypertrophy (6/33 vs. 1/33) was more common in cyclosporine-treated patients (P = 0.04 in both parameters). This was the first prospective, randomized study with paired kidney analysis showing the renal function was significantly better in tacrolimus-treated patients than in cyclosporine-treated patients.     

Hyperlipidemia in pediatric kidney transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine

Hyperlipidemia is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in adult kidney transplant (Tx) recipients. We sought to determine the prevalence of, and the risk factors associated with, hyperlipidemia in pediatric kidney Tx recipients on cyclosporine (CsA). We identified 59 patients (mean age 8.2+/-5.7 years) transplanted between 1 January 1991 and 31 December 1993. Pre Tx, 34% had elevated total cholesterol [TC >200 mg/dl (5.17 mmol/l)]; 54% had elevated triglycerides [TG >200 mg/dl (2.26 mmol/L)]. Mean TG was higher pre Tx in dialysis (versus nondialysis) patients: 306 mg/dl (3.46 mmol/l) versus 228 mg/dl (2.58 mmol/l) ( P=0.04). Mean TC was higher in peritoneal dialysis than hemodialysis patients: 222 mg/dl (5.74 mmol/l) versus 169 mg/dl (4.37 mmol/l) ( P=0.03). Pre Tx and 3-year values correlated (TC, r=0.49, P=0.0008; TG, r=0.41, P=0.001); 3- and 5-year TC values correlated ( r=0.57, P=0.003). At 5 years post Tx, 41% of the recipients had elevated TC; 14% had elevated TG. Recipients with elevated TC had higher mean CsA concentrations at 1 year post Tx ( P=0.03). Recipients with elevated TG tended to receive more prednisone ( P=0.06). At 5 years post Tx, recipients had a high prevalence of hyperlipidemia. The identification and treatment of hyperlipidemia should be included in pediatric kidney Tx protocols.     

Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

In pediatric kidney transplant recipients, tacrolimus has been proposed either for primary immunosuppression or as a rescue agent for refractory acute rejection, chronic rejection, and cyclosporine toxicity. This paper describes our experience with tacrolimus conversion from cyclosporine-based therapy in six selected cases: four due to refractory acute rejections unresponsive to conventional therapy, one to chronic graft rejection, and one to cyclosporine-related hypertrichosis. A "simple-switch" conversion was used without any overlap, starting with a dose of 0.2 mg/kg per day. The time to conversion varied from 10 to 730 days after the transplant. In the patients with acute rejection, the median time to reversal after tacrolimus conversion was 12 days. The symptoms of the patient with cyclosporine toxicity completely resolved without any loss of allograft function. The patient with chronic rejection maintained stable renal function for more than 1 year after conversion. A new onset of post-transplant diabetes mellitus and dose-related nephrotoxicity were recorded as adverse events. In conclusion, our experience suggests that tacrolimus can play an important role in the salvage treatment of pediatric kidney transplantations with deteriorating graft function due to acute rejection refractory to standard therapy. Tacrolimus conversion also provides excellent results in the presence of cyclosporine toxicity.     

Safety and efficacy of generic cyclosporine arpimune in Filipino low-risk primary kidney transplant recipients

Background

In the Philippines, maintenance of immunosuppression may not always be affordable, leading to acute rejection and graft loss. The availability of the generic cyclosporine Arpimune could be economically beneficial, but its safety and efficacy should be established.

Methods

This prospective cohort study enrolled 30 renal transplant patients who received Arpimune with mycophenolate/prednisone. Their results were compared up to 6 months with 30 matched control patients who received Neoral during the same period. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) after intake of Arpimune and therapeutic drug monitoring using cyclosporine levels 2 hours after each dose were done. Pearson correlation was performed to determine linearity of relationship between the generic cyclosporine concentrations and AUC 0-4. Chi-square test was used in obtaining cyclosporine Arpimune concentrations.

Results

The abbreviated concentration AUC of Arpimune was similar to that of Neoral, and the 2-hour sampling point (r = 0.813; P < .001) showed the best correlation. Calculated creatinine clearance (mL/min) versus Neoral was 71.36 ± 13 versus 68.03 ± 16.6 (P = .61) at 1 month, 70.4 ± 14.8 versus 64.2 ± 11.4 (P = .12) at 3 months, and 74.02 ± 15.8 versus 62.03 ± 12.1 (P = .002) at 6 months. Two Arpimune versus 4 Neoral patients (P = .67) developed biopsy-proven acute rejection. One septic death occurred in the Arpimune group. Graft survival was 100% in both groups. Hyperlipidemia was the most frequent side effect for both.

Conclusions

The AUC of Arpimune was similar to that of Neoral. Use of the generic cyclosporine Arpimune provided effective immunosuppression in the 6 months after transplantation. Renal allograft function was similar to that of Neoral, with minimal rates of acute rejection and adverse events.     

The recurrence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in kidney transplant patients treated with cyclosporine

To evaluate the rate of recurrence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) in renal transplant patients treated with cyclosporine, we reviewed the outcome of 25 renal Tx performed in 24 patients who had FSGS as their original renal disease. After Tx, 6 patients were treated with steroids and azathioprine (follow-up: 42 +/- 34 months) and 19 with CsA (follow-up: 30 +/- 31 months). Two of 6 Aza treated patients (33%) developed recurrence of FSGS and nephrotic syndrome (NS). Both patients lost their graft because of FSGS 24 and 25 months after Tx. Ten of 19 patients (55%) given CsA showed recurrence of FSGS; one of them had had recurrence in the first graft treated with Aza. One patient lost his graft a few weeks after Tx because of acute rejection and 3 lost their graft because of FSGS 4-28 months after NS developed. One patient with NS died from pneumonia 14 months after Tx when his plasma creatinine was 2.7 mg/dl. Three other patients now have NS and plasma creatinine between 1.9 and 2.4 mg/dl 15-37 months after Tx. The last two patients have NS and normal renal function 10 and 31 months after Tx. In both groups, most patients developed NS within the first week after Tx. The patients with recurrence, given Aza or CsA, tended to be younger at the onset of the disease and to have a shorter duration of the disease, when compared with those without recurrence, but the differences were not statistically significant. In our experience neither CsA nor Aza showed any effect on the outcome of FSGS recurring in the graft.     

Experience with belatacept rescue therapy in kidney transplant recipients

In kidney transplant recipients with chronic graft dysfunction, long‐term immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) or mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) can be challenging due to adverse effects, such as nephrotoxicity and proteinuria. Seventy‐nine kidney transplant recipients treated with CNI‐based or mTORi‐based maintenance immunosuppression who had CNI‐induced nephrotoxicity or severe adverse events were switched to belatacept. Mean time from transplantation to belatacept conversion was 69.0 months. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ± standard deviation at baseline was 26.1 ± 15.0 ml/min/1.73 m², increasing to 34.0 ± 15.2 ml/min/1.73 m² at 12 months postconversion (P < 0.0005). Renal function improvements were also seen in patients with low eGFR (<25 ml/min/1.73 m²) or high proteinuria (>500 mg/l) at conversion. The Kaplan–Meier estimates for patient and graft survival at 12 months were 95.0% and 85.6%, respectively. The discontinuation rate due to adverse events was 7.9%. One case of post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disorder occurred at 17 months postconversion. For comparison, a historical control group of 41 patients converted to mTORi‐based immunosuppression because of biopsy‐confirmed CNI‐induced toxicity was examined; eGFR increased from 27.6 ± 7.2 ml/min/1.73 m² at baseline to 31.1 ± 11.9 ml/min/1.73 m² at 12 months (P = 0.018). Belatacept‐based immunosuppression may be an alternative regimen for kidney transplant recipients with CNI‐ or mTORi‐induced toxicity.     

Comparison of kidney transplant survival between patients treated with cyclosporine and those treated with azathioprine and antithymocyte globulin

One hundred thirty two patients who received cadaver kidney transplants in three Boston transplant centers were analyzed to demonstrate the immunosuppressive effect of cyclosporine and steroid therapy versus conventional immunosuppreseion. Of these, 35 pateints received the cyclosporine and steroid regimen and 97 received conventional immunosuppression. The number of patients with preformed reactive antibody was greater in the cyclosporine group; however, a greater number of patients were diabetic in the conventional group. The incidence of acute tubular necrosis was significantly higher in the cyclosporine group. There was no significant difference in transplant or patient survival between these groups.     

Vascular endothelial function in cyclosporine and tacrolimus treated renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Endothelial dysfunction is an early key event in the development of arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), thus an early marker of subclinical ASCVD. Endothelial function is impaired in renal transplant recipients (RTR) treated with cyclosporine (CyA). Tacrolimus is associated with less hyperlipidemia and hypertension than CyA, however, there are no data on endothelial function in tacrolimus-treated RTR. METHODS: High-resolution brachial ultrasonography was used to assess endothelium-dependent dilatation (EDD), and endothelium-independent dilatation (EID) in 20 stable RTR and a control group of 10 healthy subjects without clinical evidence of ASCVD. The RTR group included patients receiving CyA (n=10) and tacrolimus (n=10). EDD and EID were measured as percent increase in brachial artery diameter in response to reactive hyperemia and nitroglycerin, respectively. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: EDD was significantly lower in RTR versus controls (1.7+/-0.7 vs. 7.3+/-0.7%, P<0.0001), whereas EID was similar in the two groups. No significant differences were found in EDD or in EID between CyA- and tacrolimus-treated RTR. Glomerular filtration rate, plasma homocysteine, blood pressure, and lipid profiles were similar in CyA- and tacrolimus-treated RTR.     

In vitro cytokine responses in liver transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine A and tacrolimus

The inhibitory effect of Cyclosporine A (CsA) and Tacrolimus (Tacr) on interleukin 2 (IL-2) are well known, and the importance of Th1-type (IL-2, interferon gamma), and Th2-type (IL-4, IL-6, and IL-10) cytokine secretion in preventing allograft rejection is a controversial issue. The immunological mechanisms involved in long-term liver transplant recipients under CsA and Tacr were not studied precisely.
This study was designed to evaluate the effects of CsA and Tacr on the immune response of 62 long-term survivors following liver transplantation.
T-cell and B-cell subpopulations, the T helper (Th) cell activity, T-cell cytokine production, Staphylococcus aureus Cowan strain I (SAC-I)-stimulated B-cell responses and PWM-stimulated B-cell responses were examined.
CsA and Tacr decreased whole T-cell populations as well as CD4+T-cell IL-2 responses (p < 0.005, Tacr and p = 0.02, CsA), impaired CD4+ cell Th activity (p < 0.01, Tacr and p = 0.02, CsA) and reduced SAC-I-stimulated B-cell responses (immunoglobulin-secreting cells [ISC]: p = 0.001, Tacr and p < 0.05, CsA). A significantly impaired T-cell IL-10 secretion (p = 0.0001) and decreased Th function of whole T cells was found in Tacr-treated patients only, whereas unstimulated Th1 responses and SAC-I-stimulated B-cell IL-6 responses were reduced in CsA-treated patients.
Our data show that Tacr suppresses T-, CD4+-, and B-cell responses more effectively than CsA which may be relevant in the maintenance of long-term stable liver graft function.     

Effects of and predictors for tacrolimus rescue therapy among renal transplant patients under cyclosporine-based immunosuppression

BACKGROUND: Though cyclosporine has dramatically decreased rejection rates and improved graft survival rates of renal allografts, there is still a remarkable rate of acute rejection and progressive deterioration of renal function after transplantation. Rescue therapy with tacrolimus has been used for allografts failing under cyclosporine-based treatment in order to get some renal functional recovery or stabilization. The aim was to evaluate tacrolimus rescue therapy for failing allografts under cyclosporine-based immunosuppression for possible prediction factors for success. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five renal allograft recipients with failing transplants under cyclosporine-based immunosuppression were enrolled into this study. Renal function was evaluated by reciprocal serum creatinine level (1/Cr) and calculated CCr. The slope of changes in 1/Cr and CCr were calculated before and after tacrolimus therapy. The possible risk factors that affect the outcome of tacrolimus rescue therapy were analyzed. RESULTS: Nineteen patients showed improved renal function (group 1) and 16 patients, persistent deterioration (group 2) after rescue therapy. Group 1 showed positive slopes of changes of 1/Cr and CCr after rescue therapy. Group 2 patients showed persistent negative slopes although less negative than before rescue therapy. Only the posttransplant time was the significant predictive factor for successful tacrolimus therapy (P = .018). CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus rescue therapy improved or stabilized renal function in some patients with failing grafts under cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. To assure a successful rescue effect, it should be given early after transplantation, if there is a tendency toward deterioration of renal function.     

他克莫司与环孢素A在高致敏肾移植受者中的应用比较

目的 观察和比较高致敏肾移植受者应用他克莫司(FK506)与环孢素A(CsA)的有效性和安全性.方法 根据术后免疫抑制方案的不同,将147例高致敏肾移植受者(其中术前群体反应性抗体＞50%的首次肾移植受者59例,2次肾移植受者88例)分为FK506组(53例)和CsA组(94例),两组的免疫抑制方案分别为FK506(或CsA)+霉酚酸酯+泼尼松.观察并分析两组受者术后移植肾存活率、血肌酐水平以及并发症的发生率.结果 FK506组术后1、3和5年的移植肾存活率(86.8%、82.3%和75.3%)略高于CsA组(81.9%、75.4%和66.9%),但差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);FK506组术后1年时血肌酐水平为(100.72±15.88)μmol/L,CsA组为(117.29±11.77)μmol/L,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01);FK506组与CsA组相比,术后急性排斥反应、慢性排斥反应、肝功能损害、高血压和高血脂的发生率显著降低(P＜0.05),而高血糖的发生率明显升高(P＜0.01),两组移植肾功能延迟恢复和感染的发生率无明显差异(P＞0.05).结论 FK506与CsA相比,能有效降低高致敏受者肾移植术后急、慢性排斥反应的发生率,减少术后并发症的发生,提高移植肾的长期存活率,对高致敏肾移植受者是非常有效和安全的.     

A peculiar vacuolization in the kidney transplant of a child treated with tacrolimus

Tacrolimus (TAC) is a useful immunosuppressive agent in the prevention of rejection. However, the blood level between its therapeutic and toxic levels is narrow such that its nephrotoxicity is a problem. Moreover, its bioavailability and pharmakokinetics are highly variable. We experienced a case of acute nephrotoxicity, in which the blood level rose about 10 times above the expected level. We found a peculiar vacuolization in the transplant biopsy specimen. This change showed a marked vacuolization of the tubular cells, suggestive of acute nephrotoxicity by TAC.     

Influence of cyclosporine and tacrolimus on serum uric acid levels in stable kidney transplant recipients

Although hyperuricemia is a well-known adverse effect of cyclosporine (CsA) treatment, there are contradictory data regarding the effect of tacrolimus on uric acid levels. The aim of this study was to examine the influences of CsA and tacrolimus-based treatment regimens on serum uric acid levels in 155 renal transplant recipients with normal allograft function who underwent renal transplantation between 1999 and 2002. Serum uric acid levels were recorded at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months follow-up. The patients were treated with CsA-based (n = 73), tacrolimus-based (n = 47), or conversion from CsA-based to tacrolimus-based (n = 35) immunosuppressive regimens. Serum uric acid levels for patients in the CsA and tacrolimus groups were 6.3 +/- 1.6 versus 7.9 +/- 1.9 mg/dL and 6.5 +/- 1.8 versus 8.0 +/- 1.8 mg/dL at the study outset and 24 months, respectively. Both of the treatment regimens showed progressively increasing serum uric acid levels (P < .001). Serum uric acid levels of patients with treatment conversion from CsA to tacrolimus were 8.6 +/- 2.8 mg/dL before conversion and 8.1 +/- 1.9 mg/dL after conversion. There was no alteration in serum uric acid levels after the change of treatment (P > .05). These findings indicate that, compared with CsA, tacrolimus offers no advantage for serum uric acid levels in renal transplant recipients.     

Safety and efficacy of conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus (prograf) to once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus (graceptor) in stable kidney transplant recipients

Background

Graceptor is a new modified-release once-daily formulation of tacrolimus with an efficacy and safety profile similar to twice-daily tacrolimus (Prograf), as identified by clinical trials, offering a more convenient dosing regimen to improve adherence. The aim of this study was to analyze the safety of a 1:1 dose conversion from twice-daily Prograf to once-daily Graceptor in stable kidney transplant recipients.

Methods

We switched 33 Japanese patients who had undergone kidney transplantation ≥1 years before from twice-daily Prograf to once-daily Graceptor. The dose conversion ratio between Prograf and Graceptor was 1:1. We compared the following parameters: minimum tacrolimus concentration (C_min); concentration dose per weight (CDW); serum creatinine (sCr); blood urea nitrogen (BUN); total cholesterol (TC); high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C); uric acid (UA); fasting blood sugar (FBS). Time points for measurements were 1 month before study start and 1 and 2 months afterward.

Results

The mean age of the subjects in this study was 46.5 ± 13.1 years. Mean C_min decreased from 4.55 ± 1.79 to 3.20 ± 1.22 ng/dL. The mean CDW also decreased, from 99.8 ± 69.5 to 75.0 ± 55.1 mg/dL/kg over the 2 months. There were no significant changes in sCR, BUN, UA, and FBS. Mean TC increased from 187.5 ± 51.4 to 194.3 ± 43.4 mg/dL, and mean HDL-C changed from 53.7 ± 12.0 to 56.1 ± 11 mg/dL. There were no episodes of rejection or infection.

Conclusions

We conclude that switching from Prograf to Graceptor is safe and has the advantage of improving adherence. It could also have a beneficial effect in controlling glycemic levels and the adverse effects of tacrolimus. In many cases (25%-30%), the minimum concentration of tacrolimus decreased after changing tablets. With Graceptor, the ratio of area under trough level to area under the curve (AUC) is low compared with Prograf, resulting in low C_min values of 1-2 ng/mL, and the AUC for Graceptor is very similar to that for Prograf.