Condylar and temporomandibular joint disc positions after mandibular osteotomy for prognathism

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the changes in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) morphology and clinical symptoms after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) with and without a Le Fort I osteotomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 43 patients with a diagnosed jaw deformity, 20 underwent IVRO without internal fixation and 23 underwent SSRO with rigid internal fixation. Some operations were performed in combination with a Le Fort I osteotomy. The TMJ symptoms and joint morphology, including the disc position, were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and axial cephalography. RESULTS: A significant difference in the direction of condylar rotation was seen in horizontal axial cephalography images (P <.01). Fewer or no TMJ symptoms were reported postoperatively by 88% of the patients who underwent IVRO with or without a Le Fort I osteotomy and by 66.7% of patients who underwent SSRO with or without a Le Fort I osteotomy. In sagittal images, no change was seen in anterior disc displacement after SSRO; however, improvement was seen in 44.4% of patients with anterior disc displacement who underwent IVRO with or without a Le Fort I osteotomy. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that SSRO does not improve anterior disc displacement; IVRO improves anterior disc displacement in the initial postsurgical period, and both procedures may improve TMJ symptoms.     

Maxillary stability following Le Fort I osteotomy in combination with sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy: a comparative study between titanium miniplate and poly-L-lactic acid plate.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare changes in maxillary stability after Le Fort I osteotomy with titanium miniplate and poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) plate (Fixsorb-MX; Takiron Co, Osaka, Japan). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The subjects were composed of 47 Japanese patients with diagnosed jaw deformity: 24 underwent Le Fort I osteotomy and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO); and 23 underwent Le Fort I osteotomy intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy without internal fixation. Each group was divided into titanium plate and PLLA plate groups. Time course changes between plate groups were compared using lateral and posteroanterior cephalography. RESULTS: Significant differences were identified between titanium plate and PLLA plate groups in A point after Le Fort I osteotomy and SSRO (P < .05). Significant differences existed between titanium plate and PLLA plate groups in vertical component of posterior nasal spine after Le Fort I osteotomy in both combinations with SSRO and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (P < .05). However, no significant differences were identified in measurements on posteroanterior cephalography. CONCLUSION: These results suggest a slight tendency for vertical impaction after Le Fort I osteotomy both in combination with SSRO and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy with PLLA plates, although differences in time course changes were not clinically apparent, and normal occlusion was established in all patients.     

Condylar and disc positions after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy with and without a Le Fort I osteotomy

The purpose of this study was to examine the changes in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) morphology and clinical symptoms after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) with and without a Le Fort I osteotomy. Of 50 Japanese patients with mandibular prognathism with mandibular and bimaxillary asymmetry, 25 underwent IVRO and 25 underwent IVRO in combination with a Le Fort I osteotomy. The TMJ symptoms and joint morphology, including disc tissue, were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively by magnetic resonance imaging and axial cephalogram. Improvement was seen in just 50% of joints with anterior disc displacement (ADD) that received IVRO and 52% of those that received IVRO with Le Fort I osteotomy. Fewer or no TMJ symptoms were reported postoperatively in 97% of the joints that received IVRO and 90% that received IVRO with Le Fort I osteotomy. Postoperatively, there were significant condylar position changes and horizontal changes in the condylar long axis on both sides in the two groups. There were no significant differences between improved ADD and unimproved ADD in condylar position change and the angle of the condylar long axis, although distinctive postoperative condylar sag was seen. These results suggest that IVRO with or without Le Fort I osteotomy can improve ADD and TMJ symptoms along with condylar position and angle, but it is difficult to predict the amount of improvement in ADD.     

Postoperative stability of bimaxillary surgery in Class III patients with mandibular protrusion and mandibular deviation: a frontal cephalometric study

The aims of this study into bimaxillary surgery were to investigate and compare the postoperative stability of deviated side (lengthened side) and non-deviated side (shortened side), the effect of the type of surgery performed in the mandible, and the changes in signs and symptoms of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders before and after surgery. The sample consisted of 31 Class III patients in whom imbalance between the maxilla and the mandible were corrected by Le Fort I osteotomy combined with bilateral intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (BIVRO group, n=9), bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO group, n=10), or IVRO and SSRO (IVRO+SSRO group, n=12). IVRO+SSRO and BIVRO are more effective in improving TMJ signs and symptoms. There was no significant post-surgical difference between deviated and non-deviated sides in any group. BIVRO and BSSRO showed excellent post-surgical stability on both sides; less was found in the IVRO+SSRO group. The IVRO+SSRO group showed greater transverse displacement in menton point than the BIVRO group. In conclusion, after bimaxillary surgery and in asymmetric patients there were no differences between deviated and non-deviated sides, BIVRO and BSSRO appear to be more stable than IVRO+SSRO.     

The assessment of blood loss in orthognathic surgery for prognathia.

PURPOSE: It is difficult to predict the need for blood transfusion during orthognathic surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences between patients who underwent different orthognathic procedures, and to assess the need for transfusion in orthognathic surgery. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We examined 62 prognathic patients who underwent orthognathic surgery in our hospital. The subjects were divided into 4 groups according to procedure. Pre- and postoperative values of blood parameters were evaluated statistically. RESULTS: A greater amount of blood was lost in the double-jaw surgeries than in the single-jaw surgeries. There was a significant difference between sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) combined with Le Fort I osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) ( P < .05). However, none of the patients required transfusion intraoperatively. In all groups except the IVRO group, there were significant differences in red blood cell count, hemoglobin, and hematocrit between preoperative values and 1 week postoperative values ( P < .05). Although the values of red blood cell, hemoglobin, and hematocrit tended to decrease until 2 weeks postoperative, no complications occurred. Simple regression analysis showed significant positive correlation between duration of operation and blood loss ( P < .05). CONCLUSION: The present results indicate that there is little risk of marked bleeding in routine procedures, and that IVRO causes minimal bleeding. Transfusion was not necessary in IVRO or SSRO with or without Le Fort I osteotomy.     

下颌升支截骨术不同术式对口颌系统功能影响的比较

目的 比较下颌升支矢状截骨术（ＳＳＲＯ）和下颌升直垂直截骨术（ＩＶＲＯ）后退下颌对口颌系统功能的影响。方法 ２７例下颌前突患者（１６例接受ＳＳＲＯ,１１例接受ＩＶＲＯ）分别在术前、术后３个月、６个月测定Ｈｅ力、咀嚼效能及髁突位置。结果 术后３个月时,两组患者的Ｈｅ力、咀嚼效能均有不同程度下降,ＩＶＲＯ组下降更为明显。术后６个月时,ＳＳＲＯ组患者的Ｈｅ力、咀嚼效能的均值已越过术前,而ＩＶＲＯ组患者的     

Two-year follow-up of changes in bite force and occlusal contact area after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy with and without Le Fort I osteotomy

This study was performed to examine the longitudinal changes in bite force and occlusal contact area after mandibular setback surgery via intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO). Patients with mandibular prognathism who underwent IVRO (surgical group: 39 men and 39 women) were compared with subjects with class I skeletal and dental relationships (control group; 32 men and 35 women). The surgical group was divided into two subgroups: 1-jaw surgery (n = 30) and 2-jaw surgery (n = 48). Bite force and contact area were measured in maximum intercuspation with the Dental Prescale System before treatment, within 1 month before surgery, and at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months postsurgery. A linear mixed model was used to investigate the time-dependent changes and associated factors. Bite force and contact area decreased during presurgical orthodontic treatment, were minimal at 1 month postsurgery, and increased gradually thereafter. The 1-jaw and 2-jaw subgroups showed no significant differences in bite force. The time-dependent changes in bite force were significantly different according to the contact area (P < 0.05). The results of this study suggest that bite force and occlusal contact area gradually increase throughout the postsurgical evaluation period. Increasing the occlusal contact area may be essential for improving bite force after surgery.     

Recovery of mandibular mobility following orthognathic surgery

The aim of this prospective study was to define the patterns of recovery of mandibular mobility following three commonly performed orthognathic surgical procedures. Twenty-two consecutive patients undergoing either isolated Le Fort I osteotomy (LE FORT; n = 7), sagittal split ramus osteotomies (SSRO; n = 7), or intraoral vertical ramus osteotomies (IVRO; n = 9) were studied. LE FORT and SSRO patients had no mandibular immobilization, whereas IVRO patients were immobilized by dental fixation for 3 weeks. Mandibular mobility was assessed by measurement of maximal mandibular opening (MMO) and lateral and protrusive excursions. No significant difference in MMO was observed between groups prior to surgery (LE FORT, 47.0 mm; SSRO, 50.7 mm; IVRO, 54.5 mm). A significant reduction in MMO occurred immediately after surgery in the LE FORT and SSRO groups and at release of fixation in the IVRO group. Each group returned to presurgical levels of mandibular mobility at a different rate following surgery. LE FORT patients recovered quickly, regaining 83% (mean, 38.7 mm) of MMO by 1 month and exceeded preoperative levels (mean, 49.6 mm) by 6 months. SSRO patients showed hypomobility (mean, 23.5 mm) after 1 month, with significant improvement in MMO (mean, 38.0 mm) at 2 months, and nearly complete recovery (96.2%; mean, 48.8 mm) at 6 months. IVRO patients recovered rapidly after release of dental fixation, achieving 78% (mean, 39.8 mm) of preoperative MMO at 2 months. This study shows that significant differences in recovery patterns of mandibular mobility exist between surgical procedures. The clinician should be aware of these differences in recovery patterns in defining goals for individual patient rehabilitation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

不同正颌外科方案对骨性Ⅲ类伴前牙开(恰) 垂直向稳定性的影响

目的 比较不同正颌外科手术方案对骨性Ⅲ类错伴前牙开术后垂直向稳定性的影响.方法 收集入院接受手术的骨性Ⅲ类错伴前牙开畸形患者122例,分别采用双侧下颌升支矢状劈开(BSSRO)(50例)、下颌升支垂直骨劈开(IVRO)(30例)、BSSRO+Le FortⅠ(22例)、IVRO+Le FortⅠ(20例)作为手术方案,并且除IVRO方案外其他所有方案病例均接受钛板颌骨内坚固内固定术.术后正畸完成时及完成后6、24个月时随访接受临床检查与头影测量分析评估垂直向复发情况,观察指标包括覆、下颌平面角、颌间夹角.结果 01)BSSRO+Le FortⅠ与IVRO+Le FortⅠ组覆显著减小的比率在6、24个月都少于BSSRO与IVRO组.2)BSSRO+Le FortⅠ组与IVRO+Le FortⅠ组下颌平面角显著增加的比率在6、24个月都少于BSSRO与IVRO组.3)6个月时BSSRO+Le FortⅠ组与IVRO+Le FortⅠ组颌间夹角显著增加的比率少于BSSRO组与IVRO组,而24个月时无统计学差异.结论 双颌外科(BSSRO+Le FortⅠ与IVRO+Le FortⅠ)均比单颌外科(BSSRO与IVRO)能更加有效地减少垂直向复发的数量和幅度.     

Comparison of osseous healing after sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy

The sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) is generally associated with greater postoperative stability than the intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO); however, it entails a risk of inferior alveolar nerve damage. In contrast, IVRO has the disadvantages of slow postoperative osseous healing and projection of the antegonial notch, but inferior alveolar nerve damage is believed to be less likely. The purposes of this study were to compare the osseous healing processes associated with SSRO and IVRO and to investigate changes in mandibular width after IVRO in 29 patients undergoing mandibular setback. On computed tomography images, osseous healing was similar in patients undergoing SSRO and IVRO at 1 year after surgery. Projection of the antegonial notch occurred after IVRO, but returned to the preoperative state within 1 year. The results of the study indicate that IVRO is equivalent to SSRO with regard to both bone healing and morphological recovery of the mandible.     

Change in condylar long axis and skeletal stability following sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathia.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare postsurgical time course changes in condylar long axis and skeletal stability between sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 40 Japanese patients with a diagnosed jaw deformity, 20 underwent IVRO without internal fixation and 20 underwent SSRO with rigid internal fixation. The time course change in condylar long axis and skeletal stability were assessed with axial, frontal, and lateral cephalograms. RESULTS: A significant difference in the rotation direction of condylar long axis was seen in horizontal axial cephalogram images (P <.01). In Pog-N perpendicular to SN, the IVRO group showed gradual decrease, although SSRO group showed gradual increase in lateral cephalogram (P <.05). CONCLUSION: The present results suggest a significant difference between SSRO and IVRO in time course changes in proximal segment including condyle and distal segment.     

Relationship between occlusal force and condylar morphology in class II and III after bi-maxillary osteotomy

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between occlusal force and condylar morphology in class II and III after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) with Le Fort I osteotomy.

Changes in border movement of the mandible in skeletal Class III before and after orthognathic surgery

The purpose of this study was to examine the changes in border movement of the mandible before and after mandibular ramus osteotomy in patients with prognathism. The subjects were 73 patients with mandibular prognathism who underwent sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) with and without Le Fort I osteotomy. Border movement of the mandible was recorded with a mandibular movement measure system (K7) preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. Of the 73 patients, 21 had measurements taken at 1.5 years postoperative. Data were compared between the pre- and postoperative states, and the differences analyzed statistically. There was no significant difference between SSRO alone and SSRO with Le Fort I osteotomy in the time-course change. The values at 6 months postoperative were significantly lower than the preoperative values for maximum vertical opening (P = 0.0066), maximum antero-posterior movement from the centric occlusion (P = 0.0425), and centric occlusion to maximum opening (P = 0.0300). However, there were no significant differences between the preoperative and 1.5 years postoperative measurements. This study suggests that a postoperative temporary reduction in the border movement of the mandible could recover by 1.5 years postoperative, and the additional procedure of a Le Fort I osteotomy does not affect the recovery of mandibular motion after SSRO.     

Evaluation of treatment with unilateral mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy and maxillary osteotomy in patients with condylar osteochondroma and mandibular asymmetry: A retrospective case series

The aim of the study was to describe an approach where condylar resection with condylar neck preservation was combined with Le Fort I osteotomy and unilateral mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO).Patients with a unilateral condylar osteochondroma combined with dentofacial deformity and facial asymmetry who underwent surgery between January 2020 and December 2020 were enrolled. The operation included condylar resection, Le Fort I osteotomy and contralateral mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO). Simplant Pro 11.04 software was used to reconstruct and measure the preoperative and postoperative craniomaxillofacial CT images. The deviation and rotation of the mandible, change in the occlusal plane, position of the “new condyle” and facial symmetry were compared and evaluated during follow-up. Three patients were included in the present study. The patients were followed up for 9.6 months on average (range, 8–12). Immediate postoperative CT images showed that the mandible deviation and rotation and occlusion plane canting decreased significantly postoperatively; facial symmetry was improved but still compromised. During the follow-up, the mandible gradually rotated to the affected side, the position of the “new condyle” moved further inside toward the fossa, and both the mandible rotation and facial symmetry were more significantly improved.Within the limitations of the study it seems that for some patients a combination of condylectomy with condylar neck preservation and unilateral mandibular SSRO can be effective in achieving facial symmetry.     

Assessment of lateral pterygoid muscle and temporomandibular joint disc after Le Fort I osteotomy with and without intentional pterygoid plate fracture and sagittal split ramus osteotomy in class II and class III patients

The aim of the study was to examine lateral pterygoid muscle (LPM) and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc before and after Le Fort I osteotomy with and without intentional pterygoid plate fracture and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) in class II and class III patients.Le Fort I osteotomy and SSRO were performed in class II and class III patients. LPM measurements using oblique sagittal computed tomography (CT) images and TMJ disc position using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were examined. Statistical comparisons were performed for the LPM and TMJ between class II and class III patients and between those with and without intentional pterygoid plate fracture in Le Fort I osteotomy.The subjects comprised 60 female patients (120 sides), with 30 diagnosed as class II and 30 as class III. Preoperatively, the width of the condylar attachment, width at eminence, length of the LPM, angle of the LPM, and square of the LPM were significantly smaller in the class II group than in the class III group (p < 0.05). After 1 year, the width of the condylar attachment, width at eminence, and angle of the LPM remained significantly smaller in the class II group than in the class III group (p < 0.0001). TMJ disc position was significantly related to the width of the condylar attachment of the LPM, both pre- and postoperatively (p < 0.0001). However, postoperative disc position did not change in all patients. Next, the class II patients (60 sides) were divided into two groups who underwent Le Fort I osteotomy with or without intentional pterygoid plate fracture. Changes in all measurements of the LPM showed no significant differences between these two groups.Our study suggested that TMJ disc position classification could be associated with the width of condylar attachment of the LPM before and after surgery, while the surgical procedure, including Le Fort I osteotomy with intentional pterygoid plate fracture, might not affect postoperative LMP or disc position in class II patients.     

A comparison of postoperative hypoesthesia between two types of sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy, using the trigeminal somatosensory-evoked potential method

The purpose of this study was to evaluate hypoesthesia of the lower lip using trigeminal somatosensory-evoked potential following 2 types of sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO). There were 30 patients with mandibular prognathism, with and without asymmetry, who were divided into three groups: the Obwegeser method (Ob) group, the Obwegeser-Dal Pont method (ODP) group and the intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) group. The trigeminal somatosensory-evoked potential was recorded in the region of the lower lip and evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. The average recovery periods from lower lip hypoesthesia in the IVRO and the Ob group were significantly shorter than in the ODP group (P<0.05). In conclusion, IVRO showed the earliest recovery from hypoesthesia or an absence of hypoesthesia, and lower lip hypoesthesia was less with the Ob method than the ODP method.     

Bone healing after Le Fort I osteotomy with SSRO,using uHA/PLLA plates and screws,in class II and III patients

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to compare bone healing after Le Fort I osteotomy with sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) in class II and class III patients.Patients and methodsThe subjects consisted of 46 Japanese class II and III patients. Le Fort I osteotomy was performed in combination with SSRO. They were divided into two groups (23 class II cases and 23 class III cases). Four absorbable plates (uncalcined and unsintered hydroxyapatite and poly-l-lactic acid — uHA/PLLA) and screws were used to fix the maxillary segment in all patients, in the same manner. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) was analyzed for all patients at 1 week and 1 year postoperatively. The anterior and lateral areas between the maxillary segments were measured using two-dimensional frontal and lateral views from the three-dimensional images reconstructed over a constant CT value.ResultsThere were no significant differences in the area of bone defect healing between classes II and III at 1 year postoperatively, although there were significant differences between the two groups at 1 week postoperatively (p < 0.05). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the areas of bone defect between 1 week and 1 year postoperatively, in both groups.ConclusionUsing measurements based on CT value threshold within 1 year after Le Fort I osteotomy, this study suggests that the areas of bony defect in the region of the anterior and lateral walls of the maxilla do not always decrease in both classes II and III.     

Postoperative stability of two common ramus osteotomy procedures for the correction of mandibular prognathism: A randomized controlled trial

The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the skeletal stability between sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) in the treatment of mandibular prognathism. Patients presenting with mandibular prognathism and scheduled for orthognathic surgery were randomized into either the SSRO group or the IVRO group. Changes at B-point were assessed by serial tracing of lateral cephalograms, which were taken preoperatively, and at 2 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Ninety-eight patients were recruited, with 49 patients in each group. Between 2 weeks and 6 months postoperatively, there was significantly more surgical relapse in the horizontal direction (anterior movement) in the SSRO group when compared with the IVRO group (1.83 mm (SD 2.91 mm) vs 0.49 mm (SD 2.32 mm); p = 0.019). At 2 years, there was more surgical relapse in the horizontal direction in the SSRO group than in the IVRO group (0.27 mm (SD 0.34 mm) vs 0.10 mm (SD 0.29 mm); p = 0.014). There were also more absolute changes (irrespective of direction) at B-point in the SSRO group than in the IVRO group at postoperative 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years (p = 0.016, 0.049, and 0.045, respectively). The amounts of change at B-point as percentages of total mandibular setback were 1.3% and 3.5% in the IVRO group and SSRO group, respectively. There were no differences in vertical changes between the two groups at any time points. In conclusion, the horizontal stability at B-point was shown to be superior in the IVRO group compared with the SSRO group in the correction of mandibular prognathism during the 2-year follow-up. Although the exact clinical importance of this difference is unknown at this time, this possible benefit may be an important key factor when deciding which osteotomy technique to employ for mandibular setback.     

Evaluation of condylar resorption rates after orthognathic surgery in class II and III dentofacial deformities: A systematic review

The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of morphological alterations in the condyles after orthographic surgery involving a sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO), with or without surgery on the maxilla. Searches were performed on three databases and registered in the PROSPERO. The selected studies fulfilled the criteria established by the following PICO model: (1) population: individuals with skeletal dentofacial deformities (class II or III facial patterns), without asymmetry; (2) intervention: orthognathic surgery for mandibular setback using an SSRO, with or without a Le Fort I osteotomy, and fixed with bicortical screws or plates and screws; (3) comparison: orthognathic surgery for mandibular advancement using an SSRO, with or without a Le Fort I osteotomy, and fixed with plates and screws or bicortical screws; and (4) outcome: condylar resorption rate and relapse. Initially, 1,371 articles were identified and 636 articles were screened after elimination of duplicates, and 6 articles were selected for qualitative analysis based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Five studies had data regarding the rate of condylar resorption, varying from 0.0% to 4.2%. In conclusion, condylar resorption and relapses were present in a small percentage of patients studied.     

Transitional joint effusion in the mandibular prognathic surgery patient: intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy versus sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the cause of joint effusion (JE) appearing postoperatively in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) of patients with mandibular prognathism on T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MR imaging was performed before and after surgery in 30 TMJs of 15 subjects with mandibular prognathism who underwent intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) and in 20 TMJs of 10 subjects with mandibular prognathism who underwent sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO). The preoperative MR imaging was performed 1 month before surgery, and postoperative MR imaging was performed during maxillomandibular fixation. RESULTS: Preoperatively, none of SSRO and IVRO groups had JE. Postoperatively, 12 TMJs (40%) of the IVRO group and only 1 TMJ (5%) of the SSRO group had JE. As for the TMJs in the IVRO group, on MR imaging, the degree of downward movement of the condyle after surgery was larger in TMJs with JE (3.8 +/- 2.3 mm) than in TMJs without JE (1.8 +/- 1.6 mm). JE diminished within about 4 months after removal of the maxillomandibular fixation. CONCLUSION: JE appearing postoperatively in the TMJ of patients with mandibular prognathism might be relation to the degree of downward movement of the condyle.