Long-term outcome of presymptomatic testing in Huntington disease

Our study on long-term outcome of presymptomatic testing for Huntington disease had two aims: the comparison of the psychological well-being and social adjustment of carriers and non-carriers of the mutation, and the identification of psychological determinants to improve care/support of testees. We performed a cross-sectional study of 351 persons who underwent presymptomatic testing. Those who had motor signs were excluded from the comparison of asymptomatic carrier and non-carriers. A structured interview including five self-report scales and the MINI (Mini International Neuropsychiatric Inventory) was proposed to detect a psychopathology or problem with social adjustment.We interviewed 119 testees (53%), 62 non-carriers and 57 carriers after a mean delay of 3.7 years (range: 0.32 to 8.9) after their result. Depression was frequent in asymptomatic carriers (58%). Interestingly, the self reported impact of the test showed that 27% of non-carriers did not cope well with a favourable result, and a significant percentage of non-carriers (24%) were depressed during follow-up. Multivariate analysis showed that only a previous episode of depression was predictive of depression after genetic testing in both carriers and non-carriers of the HD mutation (P<0.0001).Psychological support is necessary for all testees regardless of the result of their presymptomatic test, because psychiatric care is often needed by both carriers and non-carriers.     

Presymptomatic DNA-testing for Huntington disease: Pretest attitudes and expectations of applicants and their partners in the Dutch program

We studied the baseline attitudes, prior to testing, of 70 applicants at risk for Huntington disease (HD) and their partners in the Dutch presymptomatic DNA-testing program. Two thirds of the applicants were female; 36% already had children. The main reason (60%) for undertaking the test was for family planning. Other reasons were either to reduce uncertainty (43%) or to obtain certainty (38%). Partners of applicants stated that planning for the future was for them the most important reason (76%). Significantly more at-risk females (42%) than males (16%) anticipated an unfavorable test outcome. Quite remarkably, most applicants and partners denied that a positive result might have adverse effects on either personal mood, quality of life, or marriage. Only a few did not expect that a favorable result would induce relief. The eventual outcome of the test was expected to enable applicants to gain control over their future, whatever the result. Hence, we propose that the applicants form a self-selected group, based on their expectation that they will not be emotionally affected by either result. © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Attitudes of general practitioners to presymptomatic testing for Huntington''s disease.

A postal questionnaire was sent to all 797 general practitioners (GPs) in the Lothians, Borders, and Fife (Scotland), enquiring about attitudes to presymptomatic testing for Huntington's disease. The response rate was 74%. Eighty-two percent were in favour of the principle of predictive testing for Huntington's disease. A majority of those not in favour were prepared to refer their patients for testing. However, three-quarters of GPs were unfamiliar with the details of DNA based linkage analysis. Half of the respondents felt that disclosure of the test result and subsequent counselling and support were the responsibility of the genetic clinic. A third of respondents considered that the genetic clinic should disclose the test result while the GP should give post-test counselling and support. These findings suggest that delivering presymptomatic testing to persons at risk of Huntington's disease would be facilitated by a closer involvement of local GPs.     

Long-term impact of Huntington disease linkage testing

We performed a long-term follow-up of Huntington disease (HD) predictive testing (an average of 6 years post-test) for 16 of 20 people who received informative linkage test results. Although no pre-test or baseline psychological differences were noted between those with an increased versus a decreased risk of HD, the long-term impact was dramatically different in these two groups. The low-risk group reported less uncertainty, anxiety or worry, fear, and worry about children's risk, whereas the high-risk group reported either the same or increased concern in these areas. Those at low risk also acknowledged an increased sense of control and self-esteem, whereas those at high risk reported decreases or no changes. One high-risk individual reported chronic depression that had occurred since the testing. Additionally, those at low risk reported greater reliance and faith in spiritual or religious beliefs than those at high risk. The emotional impact of HD genetic testing justifies the continued utilization of pre- and post-test counseling protocols. Pre-test counseling should include discussion of the known risks and benefits of predictive testing, with special emphasis on the participant's expectations for future change and improvement. Although the psychological impact appears mostly favorable for those with decreased risk, there is risk for a decline in psychological well-being over time for those with an increased risk for HD. Am J. Med. Genet. 70:365–370, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Attitudes of general practitioners and midwives towards ethnicity-based haemoglobinopathy-carrier screening

Haemoglobinopathies (HbP) are severe autosomal recessive disorders with high prevalence among certain ethnic groups. World Health Organisation (WHO) advises implementing screening programmes for risk groups. Research in the Netherlands has shown that general practitioners and midwives do not perceive ethnicity as a risk factor for HbP. Moreover, registration of ethnicity is a controversial societal issue, which may complicate the introduction of a national preconception or antenatal carrier screening programme. This study investigates attitudes, intention and behaviour of general practitioners and midwives towards ethnicity-based HbP-carrier screening in general. A structured questionnaire based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour was sent by mail to a random selection of 2100 general practitioners and 1800 primary care midwives. Response was 35% (midwives 44.2% GPs 27.6%). Although 45% of respondents thought that offering a carrier test on the basis of ethnicity alone should become national policy, it is currently not carried out. The main factor explaining lack of intention towards ethnicity-based HbP-carrier screening was subjective norm, the perception that their peers do not think they should offer screening (52.2% variance explained). If ethnicity-based HbP-carrier screening would become national policy, most professionals report that they would carry this out. Most respondents favoured ethnicity registration for health purposes. As most practitioners look for role models among peers, debate among general practitioners and midwives should be encouraged when new policy is to be developed, articulating the voices of colleagues who already actively offer HbP-carrier screening. Moreover, primary care professionals and professional organisations need support of policy at national level.     

Predictive testing for Huntington disease in a developing country

Predictive testing for Huntington disease (HD), by means of direct mutation analysis, has been offered at the Division of Human Genetics, University of Cape Town, from 1995. The aim of this study was to compile a comprehensive profile of the participants who had undergone predictive testing in the Western Cape from 1995 to 2005. The sociodemographic data, uptake and outcome of tests were analyzed to inform changes to improve the current genetic counseling services. A retrospective cross-sectional design using a 'multi-method' approach of both qualitative and quantitative methods was used. Data were gathered from the participants' hospital files and genetic database. Psychosocial data were obtained by face-to-face interviews with the participants in their homes or venues of choice. A total of 36 predictive tests were performed. The uptake for predictive testing was approximately 4.5% of the estimated at-risk population. The cohort of 27 individuals comprised 16 females and 11 males. Their mean age was 35.3 years; 6 were mixed ancestry and 21 were White people (European ancestry); 11 tested gene positive, 15 gene negative and 1 was in the reduced penetrance range. The most important issue identified was that the uptake of individuals classified as mixed ancestry was substantially lower than that of the White people possibly due to limited access to the predictive testing program because of the low levels of income and education in the general population of families with HD. Strategies to address these aspects have been incorporated into the program and will be reassessed after 1 year.     

Factors related to genetic testing in adults at risk for Huntington disease: the prospective Huntington at‐risk observational study (PHAROS)

Huntington disease (HD) is a late onset ultimately fatal neurodegenerative disorder caused by a cytosine–adenine–guanine ( CAG) triplet repeat expansion in the Huntingtin gene which was discovered in 1993. The PHAROS study is a unique observational study of 1001 individuals at risk for HD who had not been previously tested for HD and who had no plans to do so. In this cohort, 104 (10%) individuals changed their minds and chose to be tested during the course of the study but outside of the study protocol. Baseline behavioral scores, especially apathy, were more strongly associated with later genetic testing than motor and chorea scores, particularly among subjects with expanded CAG repeat length. In the CAG expanded group, those choosing to be tested were older and had more chorea and higher scores on the behavioral section of the unified Huntington's disease rating scale at baseline than those not choosing to be tested. Following genetic testing, 56% of subjects with CAG < 37 had less depression when compared to prior to testing, but depression generally stayed the same or increased for 64% of subjects in the expanded group. This finding suggests that approaches to testing must continue to be cautious, with appropriate medical, psychological and social support.     

Uptake of Huntington disease predictive testing in a complete population

Using the Northern Ireland Huntington disease (HD) register, the number of prospectively recorded predictive tests was analysed over a 20-year period. Two hundred and twelve patients completed predictive testing. Ninety-two (43%) received mutation-positive results and 119 (56%) mutation negative. There was one intermediate allele result. There was no significant gender difference. One hundred and eighty affected cases confirmed by molecular genetic testing were alive on 1 January 2001. The uptake of predictive testing in the entire HD 50% at-risk population in 2001 was calculated by three methods giving a range of 12.3-14.6%. Uptake after 20 years was estimated to be 14.7%. The minimum prevalence of affected HD cases was calculated as 10.6/100,000 in 2001. The total uptake of predictive testing was calculated and it suggests that a substantial number of at-risk patients do not come forward for testing until symptomatic. Pre-symptomatic testing for this late-onset condition with no present treatment, and limited management options, still presents challenges for families.     

A psychometric study of children at-risk for Huntington disease

Huntington disease (HD) is an autosomal dominant disorder of the central nervous system with an average age of onset between 35 and 45 years and symptoms progressing slowly over the next 10 to 20 years. Research in the past few years has focused on the hypothesis that a presymptomatic or prodromal phase for HD is detectable at least 10 years prior to chronic symptoms. This study attempts to identify possible signs of a prodromal phase for HD in children who are at primary (50%) and secondary (25%) risk for HD using a screening battery of psychometric tests. The children tested were between the ages of 5 1/2 and 15 years and the tests used were the WISC-R, the PPVT-R, and the VMI. Results from this study indicated performance on the WISC-R Digit Span and to a lesser extent Coding subtests might be useful in assessing a possible memory dysfunction in children at-risk for HD.     

The choice not to undergo genetic testing for Huntington disease: Results from the PHAROS study

Rates of genetic testing in Huntington disease (HD) are lower than was predicted before direct DNA testing became available. Clinicians often do not have in-depth conversations with people at risk who chose not to test. We queried 733 research subjects who chose not to learn their HD gene status when enrolling in the Prospective Huntington At-Risk Observational Study, carried out between 1999 and 2008. Lack of an effective cure or treatment (66% of subjects) and inability to undo knowledge (66%) were the major reasons cited for choosing not to undergo HD DNA testing. Most subjects were not concerned about the length or burden of the testing process (61% and 59%, respectively). Subjects were optimistic that a treatment to improve symptoms or postpone onset would be developed within the next 10 years (56% and 53%, respectively), but they had less certainty about the prospects to prevent HD onset (36%). This is the first large, systematic study of why people at risk for HD choose not to undergo genetic testing. Attitudes about how people at risk for HD approach this life-altering choice should be reassessed as new treatments develop, and as clinical trials now require genetic testing at entry.     

Providing predictive testing for Huntington disease via telehealth: results of a pilot study in British Columbia,Canada

Predictive testing (PT) for Huntington disease (HD) usually requires several in‐person appointments which acts as a barrier to testing for those from remote regions. This pilot study reports the use of telehealth PT to examine whether such telehealth testing improves access to HD PT while maintaining quality of care and support. Individuals underwent PT via the telehealth protocol or standard in‐person protocol and were asked to complete surveys regarding their experience. Results reveal no significant differences between the in‐person‐tested and telehealth‐tested groups with respect to quality of care, information, counselling and support. The majority of participants in both groups stated that pre‐test counselling had provided them with sufficient knowledge about the advantages and disadvantages of undergoing testing, the opportunity to ask questions, and the ability to make an informed decision. The majority of participants in both groups were satisfied by the manner in which results were delivered and stated they had received sufficient information regarding the implications of these results. This study reveals that telehealth PT improves access while maintaining quality of care and support.     

When access is an issue: exploring barriers to predictive testing for Huntington disease in British Columbia,Canada

Predictive testing (PT) for Huntington disease (HD) requires several in-person appointments. This requirement may be a barrier to testing so that at risk individuals do not realize the potential benefits of PT. To understand the obstacles to PT in terms of the accessibility of services, as well as exploring mechanisms by which this issue may be addressed, we conducted an interview study of individuals at risk for HD throughout British Columbia, Canada. Results reveal that the accessibility of PT can be a barrier for two major reasons: distance and the inflexibility of the testing process. Distance is a structural barrier, and relates to the time and travel required to access PT, the financial and other opportunity costs associated with taking time away from work and family to attend appointments and the stress of navigating urban centers. The inflexibility of the testing process barrier relates to the emotional and psychological accessibility of PT. The results of the interview study reveal that there are access barriers to PT that deter individuals from receiving the support, information and counseling they require. What makes accessibility of PT services important is not just that it may result in differences in quality of life and care, but because these differences may be addressed with creative and adaptable solutions in the delivery of genetic services. The study findings underscore the need for us to rethink and personalize the way we deliver such services to improve access issues to prevent inequities in the health care system.     

Problems assessing uptake of Huntington disease predictive testing and a proposed solution

The uptake of predictive testing for Huntington disease informs our understanding of decision making by those at risk and assists with planning for service provision. Uptake figures have been reported from several centers based on the total number of people who have undertaken predictive testing as a percentage of those estimated to be at 50% risk in the region. This method produced a figure of 35% from our own service, much higher than observation of the local pedigrees indicated, and higher than other published reports. We have identified some errors in the commonly used formula. The major errors are the use of the cumulative total of those who have had testing with a static denominator of those at 50% risk, and the failure to exclude from the at-risk group those who are too young and therefore ineligible to test.We report data from the Huntington Disease Register of Victoria and estimate the prevalence to be 8 per 100,000 in 1999. Additional data on individuals at risk were collated. We found that for every diagnosed person there were 4.2 individuals at 50% risk, a lower ratio than one to five hypothesized in the literature. We examined these ratios in the context of uptake.Significantly, we provide a solution to the calculation of uptake with a formula that factors in a dynamic denominator and corrects for the number of years testing has been offered. Using this formula, we calculated an uptake of 13.0-15.4% for the state of Victoria, Australia. This formula can be used to compare uptake across different centers.     

Dilemmas of anonymous predictive testing for Huntington disease: Privacy vs. optimal care

Some persons at risk for Huntington disease (HD) seek predictive testing under the protection of anonymity to reduce the risk of insurance discrimination for themselves and their families. While Canadian and European health care systems seem to limit insurance discrimination to life and disability insurance, U.S. residents do not have national health insurance and are concerned about health insurance discrimination. Two persons residing outside Canada requested predictive testing anonymously. Their primary reason for doing so was to avoid the risks of medical insurance discrimination. After a detailed preparatory session and agreement to counselling and to receipt of results in person, we agreed to provide anonymous testing to these persons. One participant, whose psychological assessment was unremarkable, coped well with the predictive testing process and did not have the CAG expansion. The other participant had considerable emotional problems prior to testing, which necesitated postponement of discussion of results and referral for psychiatric assessment and support. Both participants had difficulty maintaining anonymity. The provision of anonymous predictive testing raises several problems. With anonymous testing, clinicians cooperate with participants to exclude insurance companies from information. This may invalidate the contract with insurance companies. A policy response by insurance companies or a universal health care system to protect individuals is preferable. Individuals who request anonymous testing may be precisely those most vulnerable and in need of additional support and counselling. However, the preservation of anonymity is a burden to participants and may frustrate the clinicians' ability to establish rapport in counselling and to provide appropriate follow-up typically available through genetic counselling in predictive testing programs. Am. J. Med. Genet. 71:197–201, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Experience over fifteen years with a protocol for predictive testing for Huntington disease

ObjectiveTo compile a comprehensive profile of the participants who had predictive testing from Huntington disease (HD) between 1994 and 2008 in Montreal, Canada.MethodThis is a retrospective cohort study. The predictive testing protocol consisted of a telephone interview to give information about predictive testing and collect demographic data; a psychological assessment and counseling session; a session focused on medical and family history of HD; a session reserved for genetic counseling; a session where results were given to participants; and a follow-up telephone interview.ResultsA total of 181 applicants requested presymptomatic testing. 135 applicants (77 women and 58 men) completed the protocol and received test results while 40 withdrew. Of the latter, 3 manifested symptoms of the disease and were referred to a neurologist or psychiatrist, and 3 had previously been tested by linkage analysis. Participants usually mentioned more than one reason for requesting predictive testing but the most frequent was to put an end to uncertainty concerning their risk of illness. The proportion of positive and negatives test results was 40% and 54.1% respectively, significantly different from the expected 50% (p < 0.01). Prenatal testing was not frequently requested.ConclusionAll the participants expressed satisfaction regarding their decision to be tested. None to our knowledge had a catastrophic reaction (major depressive disorder or psychiatric hospitalization, declared suicide attempt or suicide). Our study highlights that preparation for receiving test results is a psychologically complex process for which appropriate support in a timely fashion is critical. We feel that a cautious and ethical case by case approach remains essential and that high standards of testing should be maintained because of the far reaching impact of test results.     

Predictive testing of 25 percent at-risk individuals for Huntington disease (1987–1997)

Before the mutation causing Huntington disease was identified, predictive testing of 25% at-risk persons with a 50% at-risk parent who did not wish to know his/her genetic status, was only possible by exclusion testing. The exclusion test, using linked markers, ensures the parent's wish not to know because the parent's risk is not changed. When mutation analysis became available in 1993, new testing options for 25% at-risk persons emerged: viz., the exclusion-definitive test and direct mutation analysis. These new tests not only disclose the risk of the test candidate, but may also change the risk of the at-risk parent and siblings. The testing options for 25% at-risk test applicants and their consequences are discussed and the testing procedures and results of testing 64 25% at-risk persons in the period 1987 to 1997 are described. Relatives received unsought information in 56% of the test procedures before and 34% after the mutation was identified. A decision tree and guidelines for predictive testing of 25% at-risk test applicants are proposed. Am. J. Med. Genet. (Neuropsychiatr. Genet.) 88:662–668, 1999. © 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Evidence‐based genetic counselling implications for Huntington disease intermediate allele predictive test results

Intermediate alleles (IAs) for Huntington disease (HD) contain 27–35 CAG repeats, a range that falls just below the disease threshold of 36 repeats. While there is no firm evidence that IAs confer the HD phenotype, they are prone to germline CAG repeat instability, particularly repeat expansion when paternally transmitted. Consequently, offspring may inherit a new mutation and develop the disease later in life. Over the last 5 years there has been a renewed interest in IAs. This article provides an overview of the latest research on IAs, including their clinical implications, frequency, haplotype, and likelihood of CAG repeat expansion, as well as patient understanding and current genetic counselling practices. The implications of this growing evidence base for clinical practice are also highlighted. These evidence‐based genetic counselling implications may help ensure individuals with an IA predictive test result receive appropriate support, education, and counselling.     

Predictive testing for Huntington disease: social characteristics and knowledge of applicants, attitudes to the test procedure and decisions made after testing

An investigation has been made of the social characteristics and knowledge and experience of Huntington disease (HD) for the first 80 individuals considering presymptomatic testing (applicants) at the medical genetics centres in Edinburgh and Glasgow and of attitudes to the test procedure and decisions made after testing for those who received a result. Sixty-one percent of applicants were female and 31% were over 40 years old. Almost all had a symptomatic parent but 38% did not know HD was in their family until they were over 25 years old and 48% had never received genetic counselling. Thirty-eight percent of applicants first heard of the test at the genetic clinic, 20% from a relative and 20% from the media, but none had received information from their GP. Thirty-one applicants did not have the test because they voluntarily withdrew (17 individuals), their family structure was unsuitable or no informative result was possible (11 individuals), or they were diagnosed clinically as being affected (3 individuals). Those who voluntarily withdrew did not differ significantly from the 49 who received a result in social characteristics or knowledge and experience of HD. Twenty-two individuals were found to be at increased risk (IR) (>50% of becoming affected) and 27 to be at decreased risk (DR) (< 50% of becoming affected). There was a median period of 9 months between entering the test procedure and receiving a result and the main criticism of the procedure was that it took too long to complete and several individuals experienced considerable anxiety while awaiting their result. One year after receiving their result, almost 40% of individuals had made major life decisions, mainly in the areas of personal relationships, career and financial matters and over a third of fecund individuals in both IR and DR groups had changed their decision about future childbearing. Eighty-five percent of the IR group and 53% of the DR group requested continued follow up after the 1-year follow-up visit. The majority wanted follow up by the genetic clinician, but we have found that in practice many individuals do not attend when offered clinic appointments after this time.