Pocket proteins suppress head and neck cancer

Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) is a common cancer in humans long known to be caused by tobacco and alcohol use, but now an increasing percentage of HNSCC is recognized to be caused by the same human papillomaviruses (HPV) that cause cervical and other anogenital cancers. HPV-positive HNSCCs differ remarkably from HPV-negative HNSCCs in their clinical response and molecular properties. From studies in mice, we know that E7 is the dominant HPV oncoprotein in head and neck cancer. E7 is best known for its ability to inactivate pRb, the product of the retinoblastoma tumor susceptibility gene. However, loss of pRb function does not fully account for potency of E7 in causing head and neck cancer. In this study, we characterized the cancer susceptibility of mice deficient in the expression of pRb and either of two related "pocket" proteins, p107 and p130, that are also inactivated by E7. pRb/p107-deficient mice developed head and neck cancer as frequently as do HPV-16 E7 transgenic mice. The head and neck epithelia of the pRb/p107-deficient mice also displayed the same acute phenotypes and biomarker readouts as observed in the epithelia of E7 transgenic mice. Mice deficient for pRb and p130 in their head and neck epithelia showed intermediate acute and tumor phenotypes. We conclude that pRb and p107 act together to efficiently suppress head and neck cancer and are, therefore, highly relevant targets of HPV-16 E7 in its contribution to HPV-positive HNSCC.     

Antibodies against oncoproteins E6 and E7 of human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 in patients with head-and-neck squamous-cell carcinoma

Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) have been recognized as an essential pathogenic factor in anogenital cancer. HPV DNA has also been found in a subgroup of head-and-neck squamous-cell carcinomas (HNSCCs), and a causative role of the virus in the development of these tumors has been suggested by the concomitant inactivation of the tumor-suppressor protein pRb. Using 4 second-generation ELISAs, we found antibodies against at least 1 of the oncoproteins E6 and E7 of the high-risk HPV types 16 and 18 in 11 of 92 sera (12%) taken from HNSCC patients at or near diagnosis, in 1 of 52 sera (2%) taken from HNSCC patients >6 months after diagnosis and in 10 of 288 sera (3. 5%) taken from sex- and age-matched healthy control individuals of the normal population. In 11 of the 12 seropositive HNSCC cases, antibodies were directed against HPV16 proteins. In patients, the HPV16 antibodies were mostly of high titer, and in 6 cases, antibodies against both HPV16 oncoproteins were present. Seven of the 8 HPV16 antibody-positive sera from the control group were of low titer, and none of the 10 antibody-positive sera reacted with both oncoproteins of the same HPV type. The HPV type of the antigens detected by the antibodies in HNSCC patients correlated well with that of the HPV DNA found in the tumor. Of 19 patients known to have HPV16 DNA-positive tumors, 7 (37%) also had HPV16 E6 and/or E7 antibodies. Our finding suggests that the antibodies were formed in an immune response against HPV E6 and E7 proteins expressed in the HNSCC and thus strongly supports the concept of a biologically active role of HPV in the development of a subgroup of HNSCC.     

Inverse relationship between human papillomavirus-16 infection and disruptive p53 gene mutations in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

PURPOSE: Squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (HNSCC) often harbor p53 mutations, but p53 protein degradation by the viral oncoprotein E6 may supercede p53 mutations in human papillomavirus 16 (HPV16)-positive tumors. The prevalence of p53 mutations in HPV-positive HNSCCs is indeed lower, but in some tumors these alterations coexist. The purpose of this study was to discern whether HNSCCs differ in the type of p53 mutations as a function of HPV16 status. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The study was nested within a prospective multicenter study (ECOGE 4393/RTOG R9614) of patients with HNSCC treated surgically with curative intent. Tumors from one study center were used to construct a tissue microarray. The tumors were well characterized with respect to p53 mutational status. The tissue microarray was evaluated by HPV16 in situ hybridization. HPV16 analysis was also done on a select group of tonsillar carcinomas known to harbor disruptive p53 mutations defined as stop mutations or nonconservative mutations within the DNA binding domain. RESULTS: HPV16 was detected in 12 of 89 (13%) HNSCCs. By tumor site, HPV16 was detected in 12 of 21 (57%) tumors from the palatine/lingual tonsils, but in none of 68 tumors from nontonsillar sites (P < 0.00001). Both HPV16-positive and HPV16-negative HNSCCs harbored p53 mutations (25% versus 52%), but disruptive mutations were only encountered in HPV16-negative carcinomas. Of seven tonsillar carcinomas with disruptive p53 mutations, none were HPV16 positive, in contrast to HPV16-positive tonsillar carcinomas without disruptive p53 mutations (0% versus 57%; P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Although HPV16 and mutated p53 may coexist in a subset of HNSCCs, HPV16 and disruptive p53 mutations seem to be nonoverlapping events. A less calamitous genetic profile, including the absence of disruptive p53 mutations, may underlie the emerging clinical profile of HPV16-positive HNSCC such as improved patient outcome.     

DN‐R175H p53 mutation is more effective than p53 interference in inducing epithelial disorganization and activation of proliferation signals in human carcinoma cells: Role of E‐cadherin

One of the hallmarks of carcinomas is epithelial disorganization, linked to overexpression of matrix metalloproteases (MMP) like MMP‐9, loss of intercellular E‐cadherin and activation of epidermal growth receptor (EGFR/erbB1). Since the p53 tumor suppressor pathway is inactivated in most human cancers due to gene mutations or defective wt p53 signaling, we now investigated in human wt p53 breast carcinoma MCF‐7 cells, whether single treatment with the p53 transactivation pharmacological inhibitor pifithrin‐α, transient p53 siRNA interference or stable insertion of a dominant‐negative (DN) R175H p53 mutant increase: (i) EGFR/erbB1 activation, (ii) MMP‐9 expression and (iii) loss of surface E‐cadherin. Transient abrogation of wt p53 function increased phosphorylation of EGFR/erbB1 and MMP‐9 expression. However, all these effects were much more pronounced in cells stably transduced with the dominant negative–Arg‐175His mutant p53 (DN‐R175H mutant p53), which also showed loss of epithelial cytoarchitecture and extensive E‐cadherin downregulation. Collectively, these results support the notion that the DN‐R175H mutant p53 exerts a gain of oncogenic function by promoting disruption of E‐cadherin intercellular contacts and activation of proliferation signals. Our data suggests that epithelial shape and growth control are unequally affected depending on how wt p53 function is impaired and whether partial or full tumor suppressor activity is lost. © 2009 UICC     

Genome-wide DNA copy number alterations in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas with or without oncogene-expressing human papillomavirus

Oncogene-expressing human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) is found in a subset of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). HPV16 drives carcinogenesis by inactivating p53 and pRb with the viral oncoproteins E6 and E7, paralleled by a low level of mutations in TP53 and allelic loss at 3p, 9p, and 17p, genetic changes frequently found in HNSCCs of nonviral etiology. We hypothesize that two pathways to HNSCC exist: one determined by HPV16 and the other by environmental carcinogens. To define the critical genetic events in these two pathways, we now present a detailed genome analysis of HNSCC with and without HPV16 involvement by employing high-resolution microarray comparative genomic hybridization. Four regions showed alterations in HPV-negative tumors that were absent in HPV-positive tumors: losses at 3p11.2-26.3, 5q11.2-35.2, and 9p21.1-24, and gains/amplifications at 11q12.1-13.4. Also, HPV16-negative tumors demonstrated loss at 18q12.1-23, in contrast to gain in HPV16-positive tumors. Seven regions were altered at high frequency (>33%) in both groups: gains at 3q22.2-qter, 5p15.2-pter, 8p11.2-qter, 9q22-34.1, and 20p-20q, and losses at 11q14.1-qter and 13q11-33. These data show that HNSCC arising by environmental carcinogens are characterized by genetic alterations that differ from those observed in HPV16-induced HNSCC, and most likely occur early in carcinogenesis. A number of genetic changes are shared in both tumor groups and can be considered crucial in the later stages of HNSCC progression.     

A subset of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas exhibits integration of HPV 16/18 DNA and overexpression of p16INK4A and p53 in the absence of mutations in p53 exons 5-8

Besides well-known risk factors such as tobacco use and alcohol consumption, oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) infection also has recently been suggested to promote head and neck tumorigenesis. HPV is known to cause cancer by inactivation of cell cycle regulators p53 and pRb via expression of viral oncoproteins E6 and E7. This indicates that p53 mutations are not a prerequisite in HPV-induced tumor development. However, discrepancy exists with respect to the frequency of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) harboring DNA of oncogenic HPV and the fraction of these tumors showing p53 mutations. In our study, we examined the frequency of HNSCC demonstrating HPV 16/18 integration as identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and investigated their p53 (mutation) status by immunohistochemistry and single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis of exons 5-8. Paraffin-embedded, archival biopsy material from 27 premalignant mucosal lesions and 47 cases of HNSCC were analyzed. Ten of the 47 (21%) HNSCC unequivocally exhibited HPV 16 integration, including 8 of 12 (67%) tonsillar carcinomas. This is supported by the immunohistochemical detection of p16(INK4A) overexpression in all 10 HPV-positive tumors. Although FISH is considered to be less sensitive than PCR-based methods for HPV detection, our data clearly demonstrate clonal association of HPV with these tumors, as illustrated by the presence of integrated HPV 16 in both the primary tumor and their metastases in 2 patients. In contrast, HPV 16/18 DNA could not be detected in the premalignant lesions. In 30 of 47 (64%), HNSCC accumulation of p53 was observed, including 8 of the 10 HPV-positive carcinomas. However, in none of the latter cases could mutations in exons 5-8 be identified, except for a polymorphism in codon 213 of exon 6 in one patient. Evaluation of clinical data revealed a significant inverse relation between tobacco use with or without alcohol consumption, and HPV positivity of the tumors.     

p16INK4a overexpression predicts translational active human papillomavirus infection in tonsillar cancer

The causal role of human papillomaviruses (HPV) in squamous cell carcinogenesis of tonsillar cancers (TSCC) depends on the activity of the viral oncoproteins E6 and E7, leading to inactivation of the cellular tumor suppressor p53 and the retinoblastoma gene product pRb. Because of the negative feedback mechanisms, the pRb inactivation causes an increase of the inhibitor of the cyclin‐dependent kinases p16^INK4a. In 39 TSCC specimens, genotyping based on the amplification of HPV DNA was carried out using PCR by applying HPV type‐specific oligonucleotides. Subsequently, amplicons were hybridised with fluorescence‐labeled complementary probes using the Southern blot technology. For HPV E6/E7 mRNA expression, Northern hybridization and RT‐PCR were performed, and for p16^INK4a detection, immunohistochemistry was performed. With 21/39 (53%) HPV‐positives, the detection rate is within the range that can be expected in TSCC. The E6/E7 oncogene mRNA was detectable in 11 cases, 10 of which showed positive signals after p16^INK4a staining. Albeit the small study group was investigated, the correlation of the HPV DNA status with the p16^INK4a expression was of statistical significance (p = 0.02). Kaplan‐Meier estimations revealed better survival outcome for patients with HPV‐positive tumors with detectable E6/E7 mRNA and p16^INK4a overexpression (p = 0.02, median observation time 29 months). As mRNA expression tests are not routinely available in many clinical diagnostic laboratories, and based on the high correlation of p16^INK4a staining with HPV E6/E7 mRNA expression, in conclusion we suggest for a deeper exploration for the use of p16^INK4a as a surrogate marker with the potential to impact the standard of care of HPV DNA‐positive head and neck carcinomas.     

Human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 genotypes in head-and-neck carcinomas

Human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) is associated with squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (HNSCC) particularly from the Waldeyer's tonsillar ring. A causal role of HPV16 in carcinogenesis is linked to the activity of the viral oncoproteins E6 and E7 which inactivate the cellular tumor suppressors p53 and pRB, respectively. Lack of E6 expression in HPV16-positive HNSCC has been reported, in some cases caused by disruption of the E6 gene. We have examined the status of the HPV16 E6-E7 gene region in tumor and metastasis samples of 24 HNSCC patients employing genomic PCR. No cases with a disrupted E6-E7 region could be identified. Sequence analysis of the E6-E7 segments revealed three different HPV16 E6-E7 genotypes: the HPV16 prototype (6 of 21 cases), the E6 variant T350G (8 of 21 cases), and the E6-E7 variant A131G/C712A (7 of 21 cases). The E6 variants T350G and A131G have been associated with increased oncogenic potential in cervical cancer patients depending on host genetic factors. Their high prevalence in the HNSCC samples studied indicates that they may be important also in HNSCC development.     

Combined P16 and human papillomavirus testing predicts head and neck cancer survival

While its prognostic significance remains unclear, p16^INK4a protein expression is increasingly being used as a surrogate marker for oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). To evaluate the prognostic utility of p16 expression in HNSCC, we prospectively collected 163 primary tumor specimens from histologically confirmed HNSCC patients who were followed for up to 9.4 years. Formalin fixed tumor specimens were tested for p16 protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). HPV type‐16 DNA and RNA was detected by MY09/11‐PCR and E6/E7 RT‐PCR on matched frozen tissue, respectively. P16 protein expression was detected more often in oropharyngeal tumors (53%) as compared with laryngeal (24%), hypopharyngeal (8%) or oral cavity tumors (4%; p < 0.0001). With respect to prognosis, p16‐positive oropharyngeal tumors exhibited significantly better overall survival than p16‐negative tumors (log‐rank test p = 0.04), whereas no survival benefit was observed for nonoropharyngeal tumors. However, when both p16 and HPV DNA test results were considered, concordantly positive nonoropharyngeal tumors had significantly better disease‐specific survival than concordantly negative nonoropharyngeal tumors after controlling for sex, nodal stage, tumor size, tumor subsite, primary tumor site number, smoking and drinking [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 0.04, 0.01–0.54]. Compared with concordantly negative nonoropharyngeal HNSCC, p16(+)/HPV16(?) nonoropharyngeal HNSCC (n = 13, 7%) demonstrated no significant improvement in disease‐specific survival when HPV16 was detected by RNA (adjusted HR = 0.83, 0.22–3.17). Our findings show that p16 IHC alone has potential as a prognostic test for oropharyngeal cancer survival, but combined p16/HPV testing is necessary to identify HPV‐associated nonoropharyngeal HNSCC with better prognosis.     

Molecular profile of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas bearing p16 high phenotype

BackgroundWe sought to determine biomarker expression differences in head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCCs) based on p16/human papillomavirus (HPV) classification. In addition, our aim was to explore how expression of biomarkers is modulated after E6/E7 repression in HPV16⁺ oropharyngeal cancer cells.MethodsHPV16⁺ and HPV^- HNSCC cells were infected with retroviruses expressing short hairpin RNA targeting HPV16 E6/E7. Components of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway before and after E6/E7 gene silencing were analyzed by immunoblotting and qRT–PCR. Protein expression of 13 biomarkers was analyzed using AQUA on a tissue microarray (TMA). The HPV16 status was determined using HPV16 in situ hybridization (ISH).ResultsIn HPV16⁺ cells, E6/E7 silencing was associated with PTEN upregulation and reduction of phosphorylated EGFR. Tumors were classified into four categories based on the HPV and p16 status. HPV⁺/p16⁺ tumors expressed significantly higher levels of E-cadherin (P = 0.003), PTEN (P = 0.004), lower levels of PI3Kp110 and β-catenin (P = 0.07). There was a significant difference in overall survival (OS, P = 0.016) among the four subsets. The median OS was 24.83 months for p16^-/HPV^- patients, 11.63 for p16^-/HPV⁺ patients and was not reached for p16⁺/HPV^- and p16⁺/HPV⁺ groups.ConclusionsAberrant EGFR signaling contributes to malignant conversion of HPV16⁺ HNSCC cells. These results validate β-catenin as a distinct biomarker in HPV⁺/p16⁺ HNSCC. Wnt signaling inhibitors merit exploration in HPV⁺/p16⁺ HNSCC.     

Role of Human Papilloma Virus in Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Background: Human papilloma virus (HPV) is an important risk factor for head and neck cancer, specificallyoropharyngeal cancer, but its association with oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is uncertain. Theobjectives were to determine the HPV16 prevalence in oral tongue SCCs, its integration status and to correlatethe expression of oncogenic proteins with targets. Methods: In this case-control study with oral tongue SCC cases(n=60) and normal oral mucosa (n=46), HPV positivity was determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)using consensus and HPV 16 type specific primers and p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC). The viral integrationstatus was determined with primers specific to the E2 gene and in situ hybridization (ISH). Immunohistochemicalanalysis of HPV oncogenic proteins (E6, E7) and their target proteins (p53, pRb, cyclinD1, p16, Notch-1, EGFR)proteins was carried out in HPV positive cases. The data was analyzed with SPSS software (v 11.0). Survivalanalysis was carried out by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: HPV16 was detected in 48% (n=29) of the casesand none of the controls by PCR assay (p<0.001) while p16 IHC, as a surrogate HPV marker, detected 33%(n=18) of the cases; 18% (n=10) were detected by both the methods. Integration was observed in 83% (n=24)by E2-PCR and 67% (n=18) by ISH. The E6-p53 pathway was active in 33% of the cases; E7-pRb in 52% andboth in 11%. HPV positivity was associated with well-differentiated cancers (p=0.041) and low recurrence rate(p=0.014). Conclusion: Our study confirms a positive correlation of HPV infection with oral tongue cancer.     

HPV16 E6 confers p53-dependent and p53-independent phenotypes in the epidermis of mice deficient for E6AP

High-risk human papillomaviruses are the causative agents of cervical and other anogenital cancers. In these cancers, two viral oncogenes, E6 and E7, are expressed. E6 is best known for its ability to inactivate the tumor suppressor p53, which is thought to arise through ubiquitin-mediated degradation of p53 and involve a ternary complex between E6, p53 and the E3 ligase, E6AP. In mice transgenic for wild-type HPV16 E6, its expression leads to epithelial hyperplasia and an abrogation of normal cellular responses to DNA damage. Whereas only the latter phenotype is dependent upon E6's inactivation of p53, both are reduced in transgenic mice expressing an E6 mutant severely reduced in its binding to E6AP and other cellular proteins that bind E6 through a shared alpha-helix motif. Here, we investigated whether E6AP is required for the induction of the above phenotypes through the use of both E6AP-mutant and E6AP-null mice. E6, in the absence of E6AP retains an ability to induce epithelial hyperplasia, abrogate DNA damage responses and inhibit the induction of p53 protein following exposure to ionizing radiation. We conclude that E6 is able to induce both p53-dependent and p53-independent phenotypes through E6AP-independent pathways in the mouse.     

Detection of human papillomavirus-16 in fine-needle aspirates to determine tumor origin in patients with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

PURPOSE: Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) often clinically present with metastases to regional lymph nodes. Fine-needle aspiration of neck masses is routinely used to establish the presence of metastatic carcinoma and in turn to initiate a subsequent workup to determine the site of tumor origin. Human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 is an important etiologic agent for HNSCCs that arise from the oropharynx but less so for tumors from non-oropharyngeal sites. HPV16 detection thus provides a strategy for localizing an important subset of HNSCCs, but this approach has not been applied to fine-needle aspiration specimens. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We did in situ hybridization for HPV16 on 77 consecutive aspirated neck masses diagnosed as metastatic squamous cell carcinoma. P16 immunohistochemistry was also done because p16 overexpression may serve as a surrogate marker of HPV-associated HNSCC. RESULTS: HPV16 was detected in 13 of the 77 (17%) aspirates. By site of origin, HPV16 was detected in 10 of 19 metastases from the oropharynx but in none of 46 metastases from other sites (53% versus 0%; P < 0.0001). HPV16 was not detected in 2 branchial cleft cysts misdiagnosed as metastatic squamous cell carcinoma, but it was detected in 3 of 10 metastases from occult primary tumors. P16 expression was associated with the presence of HPV16: 12 of 13 HPV16-positive metastases exhibited p16 expression, whereas only 4 of 62 HPV16-negative metastases were p16 positive (92% versus 6%; P < 0.0001). P16 expression also correlated with site of tumor origin: 13 of 19 oropharyngeal metastases were p16 positive, whereas only 1 of 46 non-oropharyngeal metastases was p16 positive (68% versus 2%; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: HPV16 status can be determined in tumor cells aspirated from the necks of patients with metastatic HNSCC. Its presence is a reliable indicator of origin from the oropharynx.     

Human papillomavirus infection and p53 nuclear overexpression in anal canal carcinoma.

The product of HPV E6 and E7 genes is able to inactivate both the p53 and pRb proteins. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation among anal HPV infection and nuclear p53 overexpression. The Authors evaluated HPV DNA by PCR and p53 nuclear expression by immunohistochemistry in 12 cloacogenic and 6 squamocellular carcinoma. HPV DNA was detected in 71.4% of the squamocellular tumors and in 57.1% of the cloacogenic tumors. In squamocellular tumors HPV types 31-33 and 16 were found; in cloacogenic tumors type 16 alone was detected. Nuclear accumulation of p53 was found to be associated with the presence of HPV. There was no significant difference in parietal infiltration, lymph nodes involvement and prognosis between HPV+p53+ patients and HPV-p53- patients. Tumor aggressiveness is likely to be enhanced by factors other than HPV infection and p53 overexpression.     

Induction of tetraploidy through loss of p53 and upregulation of Plk1 by human papillomavirus type-16 E6

Cancer cells are insensitive to many signals that inhibit growth of untransformed cells. Here, we show that primary human epithelial cells expressing human papillomavirus (HPV) type-16 E6/E7 bypass arrest caused by the DNA-damaging drug adriamycin and become tetraploid. To determine the contribution of E6 in the context of E7 to the resistance of arrest and induction of tetraploidy, we used an E6 mutant unable to degrade p53 or RNAi targeting p53 for knockdown. The E6 mutant fails to generate tetraploidy; however, the presence of E7 is sufficient to bypass arrest while the p53 RNAi permits both arrest insensitivity and tetraploidy. We published previously that polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) is upregulated in E6/E7-expressing cells. We observe here that abnormal expression of Plk1 protein correlates with tetraploidy. Using the p53 binding-defective mutant of E6 and p53 RNAi, we show that p53 represses Plk1, suggesting that loss of p53 results in tetraploidy through upregulation of Plk1. Consistent with this hypothesis, overexpression of Plk1 in cells generates tetraploidy but does not confer resistance to arrest. These results support a model for transformation caused by HPV-16 where bypass of arrest and tetraploidy are separable consequences of p53 loss with Plk1 required only for the latter effect.