Muscle and Joint Function After Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using a Modular Shoulder Prosthesis

Changes in joint architecture and muscle loading resulting from total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) are known to influence joint stability and prosthesis survivorship. This study aimed to measure changes in muscle moment arms, muscle lines of action, as well as muscle and joint loading following TSA and RSA using a metal‐backed uncemented modular shoulder prosthesis. Eight cadaveric upper extremities were assessed using a customized testing rig. Abduction, flexion, and axial rotation muscle moment arms were quantified using the tendon‐excursion method, and muscle line‐of‐force directions evaluated radiographically pre‐operatively, and after TSA and revision RSA. Specimen‐specific musculoskeletal models were used to estimate muscle and joint loading pre‐ and post‐operatively. TSA lateralized the glenohumeral joint center by 4.3 ± 3.2 mm, resulting in small but significant increases in middle deltoid force (2.0%BW) and joint compression during flexion (2.1%BW) (p < 0.05). Revision RSA significantly increased the moment arms of the major abductors, flexors, adductors, and extensors, and reduced their peak forces (p < 0.05). The superior inclination of the deltoid significantly increased while the inferior inclination of the rotator cuff muscles decreased (p < 0.05). TSA using an uncemented metal‐backed modular shoulder prosthesis effectively restores native joint function; however, lateralization of the glenoid component should be minimized intra‐operatively to mitigate increased glenohumeral joint loading and polyethylene liner contact stresses. Revision RSA reduces muscle forces required during shoulder function but produces greater superior joint shear force and less joint compression. The findings may help to guide component selection and placement to mitigate joint instability after arthroplasty. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:1988–2003, 2019     

Thoracohumeral muscle activity alters glenohumeral joint biomechanics during active abduction.

Normal function of the glenohumeral joint depends on coordinated muscle forces that stabilize the joint while moving the shoulder. These forces can either provide compressive forces to press the humeral head into the glenoid or translational forces that may destabilize the glenohumeral joint. The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of pectoralis major and latissimus dorsi muscle activity on glenohumeral kinematics and joint reaction forces during simulated active abduction. Nine fresh-frozen whole upper extremities were tested using a dynamic shoulder testing apparatus. Seven muscle force combinations were examined: a standard combination and 10%, 20%, or 30% of the deltoid force applied to the latissimus dorsi or pectoralis major tendon, respectively. Pectoralis major and latissimus dorsi muscle activity decreased the maximum angle of glenohumeral abduction and external rotation, and increased the maximum horizontal adduction angle compared to the standard muscle combination. Thoracohumeral muscle activity also created a more anteriorly directed joint reaction force that resulted in anterior translation compared to the standard muscle combination. Therefore, the ratio between anteriorly directed translational forces and compressive forces increased during abduction due to this muscle activity, suggesting that thoracohumeral muscle activity may decrease glenohumeral stability based on the joint position and applied loads. A better understanding of the contribution of muscle forces to stability may improve rehabilitation protocols for the shoulder aimed at maximizing compression and minimizing translation at the glenohumeral joint.     

Experimental investigation of reaction forces at the glenohumeral joint during active abduction

Reaction forces at the glenohumeral joint counterbalance the mass moment of the upper extremity during shoulder motion and are directly related to the activity of muscles across the joint. Because stability of the glenohumeral joint depends on compression of the humeral head into the glenoid, reaction forces constitute an important aspect of shoulder biomechanics. The objective of this study was to measure reaction forces at the glenohumeral joint during active scapula plane abduction. Furthermore, to clarify the relationship between the deltoid and supraspinatus muscles throughout abduction, this study investigated the effect of 4 variations of applied muscle forces on the magnitude and direction of glenohumeral reaction forces. We used a dynamic shoulder testing apparatus equipped with a force-moment sensor to directly measure reaction forces. Joint reaction forces increased throughout abduction and peaked at approximately 90 degrees for all testing conditions. The largest reaction forces occurred when the ratio of applied forces favored the supraspinatus tendon, whereas simulated paralysis of the supraspinatus resulted in a significant decrease in joint compression. There were no differences in direction of the reaction force between testing conditions. The results of this study indicate that the magnitude of glenohumeral joint reaction forces varies according to the ratio of forces between the supraspinatus and deltoid muscles. Thus, conditions characterized by either deltoid or supraspinatus dysfunction may result in abnormal loading mechanics at the glenohumeral joint. Understanding the relationship between rotator cuff function and glenohumeral reaction forces will aid in clarifying the importance of muscular activity to shoulder stability and strength as it relates to compression of the humeral head.     

Function of the supraspinatus muscle: Abduction of the humerus studied in cadavers

We evaluated the function of the supraspinatus tendon with a dynamic shoulder model. Active glenohumeral joint motion was simulated in 10 cadaveric shoulder specimens with hydrodynamic cylinder forces at the deltoid muscle and at the rotator cuff. Computerized regulation initiated standardized cycles of glenohumeral joint motion, where the isolated effect of the supraspinatus muscle could be studied. The efficacy of the supraspinatus muscle on elevation of the glenohumeral joint was measured with an ultrasonic sensor system. Pressures underneath the coracoa-cromial vault were recorded with capacitive sensors, as an indicator of the impingement at the shoulder. Elimination of force of the supraspinatus muscle led to a 6 percent decrease in elevation of the glenohumeral joint. The deltoid muscle was able to reverse this loss of elevation by a force increase of one third of the lost supraspinatus force. If no force was applied to the supraspinatus muscle, average pressures underneath the coracoacromial vault decreased 8 percent. It was concluded that the supraspinatus produces less torque and more glenohumeral joint compression than the deltoid. However, the supraspinatus has no effect on depression of the humeral head during elevation.

The clinical consequence of our observations is that operative closure of supraspinatus tendon defects is not mandatory.     

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for deltoid-deficient shoulder following latissimus dorsi flap transfer. Case report

IntroductionThe usual indication for reverse shoulder arthroplasty is glenohumeral arthritis with inadequate rotator cuff and intact deltoid muscle. We report here a case of reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a lattisimus dorsi flap in a patient with deltoid-deficient shoulder following a gunshot injury.Presentation of the caseThe patient was an otherwise healthy 51-year-old male with a history of gunshot injury of the left shoulder 2006. Upon presentation in 2011, the patient had a loss of most of his shoulder bony and muscular structures. Due to deltoid muscle deficiency, the patient underwent Lattisimus Dorsi muscle flap followed by reverse shoulder arthroplasty in order to establish an upper limb function.Upon discharge, 11 days after the surgery, the patient was able to achieve 150° flexion and 90° abduction while in the supine position and 45° in each direction, while sitting. He was able to perform internal rotation (behind back) up to the level of the L1 vertebra, assisted active abduction of 90°, and external rotation of 20°. Power tests showed power of grade 4/5 for both shoulder flexion and extension and grade 2+/5 for both abduction and adduction.At the last follow up one year after the operation, The patient still had passive pain-free full range of motion, but no progress in active range of motion beyond that upon discharge.ConclusionReverse shoulder arthroplasty after Latissmus dori flap in patient with deltoid deficient shoulders can be a successful and reproducible approach to treat such conditions.     

Shoulder electromyography in multidirectional instability

We studied shoulder muscle activity in multidirectional instability (MDI) and multidirectional laxity (MDL) of the shoulder, our hypothesis being that altered muscle activity plays a role in their pathogenesis. Six muscles (supraspinatus, infraspinatus, subscapularis, anterior deltoid, middle deltoid, and posterior deltoid) were investigated by use of intramuscular dual fine-wire electrodes in 7 normal shoulders, 5 MDL shoulders, and 6 MDI shoulders. Each subject performed 5 types of exercise (rotation in neutral, 45 degrees of abduction, 90 degrees of abduction, flexion/extension, and abduction/adduction) on an isokinetic muscle dynamometer at two rates, 90 degrees /s and 180 degrees /s. After filtering, rectification, and smoothing, the electromyography signal was normalized by using the peak voltage of the movement cycle. In subjects with MDI, compared with normal subjects, activity patterns of the anterior deltoid were different during rotation in neutral and 90 degrees of abduction, whereas those of the middle and posterior deltoid were different during rotation in 90 degrees of abduction. In subjects with MDL, the posterior deltoid showed increased activity compared with normal subjects during adduction. Activity patterns of the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and subscapularis appeared similar in both groups. Dual fine-wire electromyography offers insight into the complex role of shoulder girdle muscle function in normal movement and in instability. Altered patterns of shoulder girdle muscle activity and imbalances in muscle forces support the theory that impaired coordination of shoulder girdle muscle activity and inefficiency of the dynamic stabilizers of the glenohumeral joint are involved in the etiology of MDI. Interestingly, the abnormalities are in the deltoid rather than the muscles of the rotator cuff.     

Neer Award 2006: Biomechanical assessment of inferior tuberosity placement during hemiarthroplasty for four-part proximal humeral fractures

Tuberosity malpositioning commonly occurs and is associated with a decline in clinical function after prosthetic shoulder reconstruction for proximal humeral fractures. This study assesses the biomechanical effects of inferior tuberosity position on glenohumeral joint forces and humeral head position at multiple positions. Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested. Hemiarthroplasty was performed with preservation of anatomic tuberosity height and with 10 mm and 20 mm of inferior tuberosity displacement. The rotator cuff, deltoid, pectoralis major, and latissimus dorsi muscles were statically loaded. Contact forces and humeral head position were recorded within a functional range of motion. Glenohumeral joint forces shifted significantly superiorly (P < .05) at 30 degrees of abduction after both 10 mm and 20 mm of tuberosity displacement. At 60 degrees of glenohumeral abduction, glenohumeral joint forces remained significantly altered after tuberosity displacement of 10 mm and 20 mm compared with the intact height (P < .005). This study demonstrates that, during hemiarthroplasty performed for proximal humeral fractures, malpositioning the tuberosities inferiorly results in significant superior glenohumeral joint force displacement. These findings suggest that the mechanical advantage of the shoulder abductor muscles is compromised with inferior tuberosity malpositioning and may help to explain inferior functional results seen in these patients.     

Editorial Commentary: Superior Capsular Reconstructions in Cases of Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tendons Only Partially Restore Anatomy,Yet Significantly Normalize Biomechanics–Without Resorting to Reverse Anatomy

The goal of shoulder superior capsular reconstruction and/or anterior cable reconstructions, at least in terms of biomechanics, is to primarily restore a fulcrum to assist with pain control and functional optimization, with the secondary hope of maintaining cartilage. Fully restoring glenohumeral joint loads with SCR cannot be expected in the setting of persistent tendon insufficiency. Biomechanical studies characterizing shoulder capsular reconstructions have demonstrated anatomic and functional restorations toward normalization when tested with standard biomechanical methods. Glenohumeral abduction, superior humeral head migration, deltoid forces, and glenohumeral contact pressure and area, can be optimized toward the normal intact condition, as measured by motion tracking and pressure mapping in real time, using dynamic actuators. Insofar as restoring normal native anatomy is considered a fundamental priority, with the idea that joint functional longevity is enhanced by preserving anatomy, as surgeons, we should not lose sight of reconstruction over replacement (such as nonanatomic reverse total shoulder arthroplasty) as a favored goal. Anatomy-based reconstructions such as superior capsule or anterior cable reconstruction, may prove over time to be the best primary treatment as knowledge and innovations (technical and medical) develop, with nonanatomic arthroplasty truly being a last resort (yet a clinically viable option when indicated).     

A larger critical shoulder angle requires more rotator cuff activity to preserve joint stability

Shoulders with rotator cuff tears (RCT) tears are associated with significantly larger critical shoulder angles (CSA) (RCT CSA = 38.2°) than shoulders without RCT (CSA = 32.9°). We hypothesized that larger CSAs increase the ratio of glenohumeral joint shear to joint compression forces, requiring substantially increased compensatory supraspinatus loads to stabilize the arm in abduction. A previously established three dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) model was used. Two acromion shapes mimicked the mean CSA of 38.2° found in patients with RCT and that of a normal CSA (32.9°). In a first step, the moment arms for each muscle segment were obtained for 21 different thoracohumeral abduction angles to simulate a quasi‐static abduction in the scapular plane. In a second step, the muscle forces were calculated by minimizing the range of muscle stresses able to compensate an external joint moment caused by the arm weight. If the joint became unstable, additional force was applied by the rotator cuff muscles to restore joint stability. The model showed a higher joint shear to joint compressive force for the RCT CSA (38.2°) for thoracohumeral abduction angles between 40° and 90° with a peak difference of 23% at 50° of abduction. To achieve stability in this case additional rotator cuff forces exceeding physiological values were required. Our results document that a higher CSA tends to destabilize the glenohumeral joint such that higher than normal supraspinatus forces are required to maintain modeled stability during active abduction. This lends strong support to the concept that a high CSA can induce supraspinatus (SSP) overload. © 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 34:961–968, 2016.     

Contemporary use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has evolved as the treatment for glenohumeral joint disease in patients with rotator cuff pathology because it allows for the deltoid to be further recruited during abduction. Surgical procedure for an RTSA can be done via two approaches, deltopectoral and superolateral. The most commonly reported complications include infection, dislocation, humeral fracture, glenoid fracture, hematoma, neurological damage, implant loosening, and scapular notching. The RTSA has become prominent in the treatment of shoulder pathology due to its ability to treat a gamut of complex disorders, while awarding pain relief and enhanced functional range of motion.     

Simulated joint and muscle forces in reversed and anatomic shoulder prostheses

Reversed shoulder prostheses are increasingly being used for the treatment of glenohumeral arthropathy associated with a deficient rotator cuff. These non-anatomical implants attempt to balance the joint forces by means of a semi-constrained articular surface and a medialised centre of rotation. A finite element model was used to compare a reversed prosthesis with an anatomical implant. Active abduction was simulated from 0 degrees to 150 degrees of elevation. With the anatomical prosthesis, the joint force almost reached the equivalence of body weight. The joint force was half this for the reversed prosthesis. The direction of force was much more vertically aligned for the reverse prosthesis, in the first 90 degrees of abduction. With the reversed prosthesis, abduction was possible without rotator cuff muscles and required 20% less deltoid force to achieve it. This force analysis confirms the potential mechanical advantage of reversed prostheses when rotator cuff muscles are deficient.     

Moment arms of the shoulder muscles during axial rotation

The objective of the present study was to determine the instantaneous moment arms of 18 major muscle sub‐regions crossing the glenohumeral joint in axial rotation of the humerus during coronal‐plane abduction and sagittal‐plane flexion. The tendon‐excursion method was used to measure instantaneous muscle moment arms in eight entire upper‐extremity cadaver specimens. The results showed that the inferior subscapularis was the largest internal rotator; its rotation moment arm peaks were 24.4 and 27.0 mm during abduction and flexion, respectively. The inferior infraspinatus and teres minor were the greatest external rotators; their respective rotation moment arms peaked at 28.3 and 26.5 mm during abduction, and 23.3 and 22.1 mm during flexion. The two supraspinatus sub‐regions were external rotators during abduction and internal rotators during flexion. The latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major behaved as internal rotators throughout both abduction and flexion, with the three pectoralis major sub‐regions and middle and inferior latissimus dorsi displaying significantly larger internal rotation moment arms with the humerus adducted or flexed than when abducted or extended (p < 0.001). The deltoid behaved either as an internal rotator or an external rotator, depending on the degree of humeral abduction and axial rotation. Knowledge of moment arm differences between muscle sub‐regions may assist in identifying the functional effects of muscle sub‐region tears, assist surgeons in planning tendon transfer surgery, and aid in the development and validation of biomechanical computer models. © 2010 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 29:658–667, 2011     

Effect of displacement of fractures of the greater tuberosity on the mechanics of the shoulder

Using a dynamic biomechanical model of malunion of the shoulder, we have determined the change in deltoid force required for abduction with various combinations of superior and posterior displacement of fractures of the greater tuberosity of the humerus. We tested eight fresh human cadaver shoulders in a dynamic shoulder-testing apparatus during cycles of glenohumeral abduction from 0 degrees to 90 degrees. The greater tuberosities were osteotomised and stabilised to represent malunion with combinations of superior and posterior displacements of 1 cm and less. The peak force was measured for each displacement in each specimen and statistically compared with values of no displacement using a repeated-measures analysis of variance. The abduction force was significantly increased by 16% (p = 0.006) and 27% (p = 0.0001) by superior displacements of 0.5 cm and 1 cm, respectively, while combined superior and posterior displacement of 1 cm gave an increase in force of 29% (p = 0.001). While treatment criteria for acceptable residual displacement of the greater tuberosity are widely used, there is little information on the direct biomechanical effects of displacement on shoulder mechanics. Although the results of conservative treatment are influenced by a number of factors, including associated injuries, rehabilitation and the pre-existing function of the shoulder, our data suggest that small amounts of residual displacement may alter the balance of forces required to elevate the arm at the glenohumeral joint.     

Glenohumeral joint reaction forces increase with critical shoulder angles representative of osteoarthritis—A biomechanical analysis

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the glenohumeral joint constitutes the most frequent indication for nontraumatic shoulder joint replacement. Recently, a small critical shoulder angle (CSA) was found to be associated with a high prevalence of OA. This study aims to verify the hypothesis that a small CSA leads to higher glenohumeral joint reaction forces during activities of daily living than a normal CSA. A shoulder simulator with simulated deltoid (DLT), supraspinatus (SSP), infraspinatus/teres minor (ISP/TM), and subscapularis (SSC) musculotendinous units was constructed. The DLT wrapping on the humerus was simulated using a pulley that could be horizontally adjusted to simulate the 28° CSA found in OA or the 33° CSA found in disease‐free shoulders. Over a range of motion between 6° and 82° of thoracohumeral abduction joint forces were measured using a six‐axis load cell. An OA‐associated CSA yielded higher net joint reaction forces than a normal CSA over the entire range of motion. The maximum difference of 26.4 N (8.5%) was found at 55° of thoracohumeral abduction. Our model thus suggests that a CSA typical for OA predisposes the glenohumeral joint to higher joint reaction forces and could plausibly play a role in joint overloading and development of OA. © 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 34:1047–1052, 2016.     

Dynamic glenohumeral stability provided by three heads of the deltoid muscle

The deltoid is a large bulky muscle, comprising approximately 20% of the shoulder muscles. Therefore, the function of the deltoid as a stabilizer is thought to be significant. The current authors quantified dynamic glenohumeral stability provided by three heads of the deltoid by a new biomechanical parameter, the dynamic stability index. The dynamic stability index considers not only the force vectors generated by individual shoulder muscle, but also the concavity compression mechanism. The higher the dynamic stability index, the greater the dynamic stability. The deltoid generated significant shear force and compressive force in the position of anterior shoulder instability. The deltoid provided dynamic stability with the arm in the scapular plane and only decreased the stability of the shoulder with the arm in the coronal plane. The mid and posterior heads should be strengthened vigorously in anterior shoulder instability in conservative and operative treatment, because they provide more stability generating higher compressive force and lower shear force than the anterior head. Scapular muscles should be balanced to avoid the vulnerable glenohumeral position where the arm is extended beyond the scapular plane. Anatomic reattachment of the detached labrum onto the glenoid rim in the anterior instability is important to enhance the effect of compressive force component generated by the muscles.     

Shoulder prostheses treating cuff tear arthropathy: a comparative biomechanical study.

Painful cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) affects the independence of the elderly. Surgical treatment often consists of joint replacement, the functional outcome of which remains variable. Knowledge of the biomechanical properties of the different prosthetic designs can guide the orthopaedic surgeon in the choice of implant to predict its clinical result. A 3-D computer model of the glenohumeral joint is used to analyse the moment of the deltoid muscle in the scapular plane. A geometrical 3-D ball-and-socket model of the shoulder joint was used to calculate (1) the angle-force relationships, (2) the moment arm of the deltoid muscle and (3) the moment of the deltoid muscle components, for increasing degrees of arm elevation in the scapular plane. In this 3-D model, a clinical thoraco-scapular rhythm analysis was implemented, based on measurements in normal subjects, patients treated with an anatomical prosthesis and patients treated with an inversed delta III prosthesis. These data were compared for 10 different prosthetic treatment options. RESULTS: Muscle angle-force curves show a favourable slope in non-anatomical prosthetic designs, where the centre of rotation of the glenohumeral joint is medialized, the deltoid muscle is elongated and the humeral shaft is lateralized. On the contrary, anatomical prosthetic designs do not perform well in this computer analysis. CONCLUSIONS: From a biomechanical point of view, a shoulder prosthesis which medializes the centre of rotation, lengthens the deltoid muscle and increases the deltoid lever arm, results in a significantly more powerful abduction of the shoulder, despite complete loss of rotator cuff function. RELEVANCE: This study explains why a successful functional outcome can be expected in CTA with a reversed prosthesis.     

Strategien beim Endoprothesenwechsel der Schulter

The increasing number of primary shoulder arthroplasty operations is correlated to an increasing revision rate of up to 11.2?% for anatomical shoulder arthroplasty and 13.4?% for reverse shoulder arthroplasty. To reduce the risk of implant revision the surgeon has to take the possibility of late complications into account for the index operation and to choose a modular implant system. Indications for revision arthroplasty are secondary glenoid wear, aseptic loosening, infections, rotator cuff deficiency, instability, implant malpositioning, mechanical complications and periprosthetic fractures. Due to the high rate of humeral fractures during revision surgery of anatomical stemmed implants (12?%) and reverse implants (30?%) osteotomy of the humerus is of particular importance. Osteotomy of the humeral shaft with a distal window or transhumeral shaft osteotomy as described by Gohlke can be used. The most demanding step during implantation of the revision implant is the accurate reconstruction of the prosthetic height because the stability, strength of the deltoid muscle and in unfavourable situations the degree of stiffness in the glenohumeral joint all depend on the prosthetic height. The result of anatomical glenoid revision surgery totally depends on the bony defect. Revision glenoid components showed better results compared to glenoid reconstruction using a corticocancellous bone graft but resulted in a higher rate of secondary loosening of the glenoid implant. Cementless glenoid revision implants seem to achieve a higher stability of bony fixation than cemented implants. Due to a better form closure with the reverse humeral implant and a mechanically more favorable loading of the glenoid bone stock, the glenosphere should be implanted with an inferior tilt in revision surgery.     

Hierarchy of Stability Factors in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is being used more frequently to treat irreparable rotator cuff tears in the presence of glenohumeral arthritis and instability. To date, however, design features and functions of reverse shoulder arthroplasty, which may be associated with subluxation and dislocation of these implants, have been poorly understood. We asked: (1) what is the hierarchy of importance of joint compressive force, prosthetic socket depth, and glenosphere size in relation to stability, and (2) is this hierarchy defined by underlying and theoretically predictable joint contact characteristics? We examined the intrinsic stability in terms of the force required to dislocate the humerosocket from the glenosphere of eight commercially available reverse shoulder arthroplasty devices. The hierarchy of factors was led by compressive force followed by socket depth; glenosphere size played a much lesser role in stability of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty device. Similar results were predicted by a mathematical model, suggesting the stability was determined primarily by compressive forces generated by muscles.     

The entire rotator cuff contributes to elevation of the arm

The function of the infraspinatus, teres minor, and subscapularis during elevation of the arm remains poorly defined. These muscles may generate moments that contribute to abduction of the arm, although they frequently are classified as humeral depressors. The purposes of this study were to measure the contributions to abduction made by the more inferiorly positioned rotator cuff muscles relative to the contributions of the supraspinatus and to determine the range of motion at which the muscles are most effective. Five fresh cadaveric shoulder girdles were mounted in an apparatus designed to simulate contraction of the deltoid and rotator cuff while maintaining the normal relationship between glenohumeral and scapulothoracic motions. The deltoid force required for elevation was measured without simulated contraction of the rotator cuff and with simulated contraction of the entire rotator cuff, of the supraspinatus only, and of the infraspinatus-teres minor and subscapularis only. A significant reduction in deltoid force when other muscle activity was added indicated that the additions contributed significantly to abduction. The deltoid force required with concurrent contraction of the entire rotator cuff averaged 41% less than with the deltoid alone but was not significantly different than with the deltoid and supraspinatus or with the deltoid, infraspinatus-teres minor, and subscapularis. Concurrent application of forces to the supraspinatus or the infraspinatusteres minro and subscapularis significantly reduced the required deltoid force over the range of motion studied by an average of 28 and 36%, respectively. The contributions of the rotator cuff muscles to abduction of the arm were greatest at low abduction angles (30 and 60°) and were insignificant by 120°. The infraspinatus-teres minor and subscapularis contribute significantly to abduction: their contibution was equal to that of the supraspinatus and, like the supraspinatus, they are most effective during the first 90° of abduction.     

Modifizierte Technik der Verpflanzung des Musculus trapezius zur Funktionsverbesserung bei Armplexusschäden

OBJECTIVE: Increase of shoulder stability. Elimination of inferior subluxation of the humeral head. Increase of active abduction. Better control of the paralyzed arm. Decrease or elimination of shoulder pain. INDICATIONS: Palsy of deltoid and supraspinatus muscles with weak abduction, multidirectional shoulder instability and subluxation of the humeral head after complete neurosurgical therapy (neurolysis, reconstruction of the brachial plexus). No essential active function of the elbow and hand. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Weakness of trapezius muscle. Incomplete rehabilitation after neurosurgical procedure. Stiffness of the glenohumeral joint. Arthritis of the glenohumeral joint. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: The cranial part of the trapezius muscle is detached from the scapular spine and the clavicle. Its insertion at the acromion is left untouched. The acromion is freed from the scapular spine and the lateral end of the clavicle by oblique osteotomies and then transferred to the proximal humerus. Under maximum tension the deltoid muscle is sutured on top of the trapezius muscle. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Immobilization of the arm in an abduction support (75 degrees of abduction) for 6 weeks. The physiotherapy program starts on the 1st postoperative day with assisted and active training of elbow, hand, and fingers. During the 1st postoperative week, the abduction support is removed for physiotherapy, abduction is maintained during the exercises. After 6 weeks, progressive adduction to remove the abduction support is commenced. RESULTS: The procedure was performed in 104 cases. 80 patients were followed up on average after 2.4 years (0.8-8 years). In all cases, the transfer resulted in an increase of function and in 95% in a decrease of multidirectional shoulder instability. The modification of the original technique in the latest 22 cases was superior in terms of shoulder stability. In all these cases, a decrease of instability was achieved and inferior subluxation was abolished.