Efficacy of colchicine in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis poorly responsive to ursodiol and methotrexate

OBJECTIVE: Approximately 20-30% of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) respond fully to treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). The rest have progressive disease and eventually develop cirrhosis and liver failure. More effective treatment is needed. Methotrexate improved biochemical tests of liver function and liver histology in patients with PBC who had failed to respond to UDCA in one report and induced sustained biochemical and histological remission in another. The role of colchicine in PBC is unclear. We describe three patients with symptomatic PBC who responded very well to the addition of colchicine after they had failed to respond to UDCA alone and in combination with methotrexate. We suggest that colchicine should be tried in PBC patients who clearly fail to respond to UDCA. METHODS: Three patients with symptomatic biopsy-proven, antimitochondrial antibody-positive PBC failed to respond to UDCA and then to the addition of methotrexate. Colchicine was eventually added to the regimen. Symptoms, biochemical tests of liver function, and percutaneous liver biopsies were done at baseline, after treatment with UDCA, UDCA plus methotrexate, and UDCA plus methotrexate plus colchicine. RESULTS: All three patients responded after colchicine was added to UDCA and methotrexate. Symptoms, biochemical tests of liver function, and liver histology improved in all, and blood tests normalized in two. CONCLUSIONS: Colchicine may be effective treatment in some symptomatic patients with PBC who respond incompletely to UDCA alone or in combination with methotrexate. Colchicine may be tried in such patients.     

Methotrexate improves biochemical tests in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis who respond incompletely to ursodiol.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease of presumed autoimmune etiology. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), methotrexate, and colchicine each have shown promise in its treatment. The value of combining 2 or 3 of these drugs is uncertain. The aim of this study was to determine whether addition of methotrexate to the treatment regimen improves results of liver biochemical tests in patients with antimitochondrial antibody-positive PBC who responded incompletely to treatment with UDCA and colchicine. METHODS: Methotrexate was added to the treatment regimen of 10 consecutive patients with antimitochondrial antibody-positive PBC who had an incomplete response to therapy with UDCA alone or in combination with colchicine. The primary end point was biochemical response. Symptoms and histological changes were also recorded. RESULTS: Addition of methotrexate to the UDCA plus colchicine regimen was associated with a significant reduction in serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels beyond those found with UDCA and colchicine alone or in combination. Median ALP concentration was 389 IU (range, 247-1013 IU) at baseline, 300 IU (range, 155-467 IU) after treatment with UDCA plus colchicine, and 120 IU (range, 66-351 IU) after treatment with methotrexate. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of methotrexate to a regimen of UDCA and colchicine may be beneficial for patients with PBC who respond incompletely to treatment with UDCA and colchicine.     

A prospective trial of colchicine and methotrexate in the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine if colchicine or methotrexate improves blood test results, symptoms, and/or liver histology in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed primary biliary cirrhosis whose serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels were at least 2 times above normal and who were not yet candidates for liver transplantation received colchicine or methotrexate and were followed up for 2 years. RESULTS: In patients receiving colchicine (n = 43), mean pruritus score decreased from 1.63 to 1.12 (P = 0.04), ALP level from 494 to 355 U/L (P < 0.0001), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level from 79 to 61 U/L (P < 0.0001). In patients receiving methotrexate (n = 42), pruritus score decreased from 1.25 to 0.44 (P = 0.0001), ALP from 478 to 235 U/L (P < 0.0001), and ALT from 96 to 61 U/L (P = 0.0001). Methotrexate but not colchicine significantly improved liver histology (P = 0.005) and serum immunoglobulin G levels (P = 0.0002). Methotrexate improved most blood test results more than colchicine. Serum bilirubin levels increased slightly with each drug, and albumin levels decreased slightly. CONCLUSIONS: Both colchicine and methotrexate improved biochemical test results and symptoms in primary biliary cirrhosis, but the response to methotrexate was greater.     

Results of long-term ursodiol treatment for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE: When ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is used for the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis, it has been associated with biochemical improvement, histological stability, reduced risk of esophageal varices, and increased survival free of transplantation. There is limited information available about the long-term outcome of these patients with primary biliary cirrhosis on UDCA treatment. To address this, we reviewed the long-term results from patients enrolled in our original randomized study with up to 12 yr of follow-up. METHODS: From April 1988 to March 1992, a total of 180 patients were enrolled into a randomized, controlled trial evaluating UDCA (n = 89) versus placebo (n = 91). When the randomized portion of the study concluded in May 1992, patients were switched to active medication and followed for up to an additional 8 yr. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients originally assigned to UDCA and 42 patients originally assigned to placebo have died or undergone transplantation. The patients who died or were transplanted were more histologically advanced at entry (p < 0.001). Seventy-six of the remaining 110 patients return for regular follow-up; mailed questionnaires were returned by an additional 25 patients, and nine patients have been lost to follow-up. Twenty-two of the 76 patients we follow have normal liver tests (ALP, bilirubin, and AST). Patients with normal liver tests had significantly lower levels of ALP and AST at baseline (p < 0.05), but did not differ in histological stage or total bilirubin from those with persistently abnormal tests. CONCLUSIONS: UDCA appears to be of most benefit when instituted in early stage disease. Although a substantial percentage of patients will achieve biochemical normalization on UDCA alone, there is a continued need for therapeutic options for others who have less complete biochemical responses.     

Methotrexate (MTX) plus ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis

This placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter trial compared the effects of MTX plus UDCA to UDCA alone on the course of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). Two hundred and sixty five AMA positive patients without ascites, variceal bleeding, or encephalopathy; a serum bilirubin less than 3 mg/dL; serum albumin 3 g/dL or greater, who had taken UDCA 15 mg/kg daily for at least 6 months, were stratified by Ludwig's histological staging and then randomized to MTX 15 mg/m2 body surface area (maximum dose 20 mg) once a week while continuing on UDCA. The median time from randomization to closure of the study was 7.6 years (range: 4.6-8.8 years). Treatment failure was defined as death without liver transplantation; transplantation; variceal bleeding; development of ascites, encephalopathy, or varices; a doubling of serum bilirubin to 2.5 mg/dL or greater; a fall in serum albumin to 2.5 g/dL or less; histological progression by at least two stages or to cirrhosis. Patients were continued on treatment despite failure of treatment, unless transplantation ensued, drug toxicity necessitated withdrawal, or the patient developed a cancer. There were no significant differences in these parameters nor to the time of development of treatment failures observed for patients taking UDCA plus MTX, or UDCA plus placebo. The trial was conducted with a stopping rule, and was stopped early by the National Institutes of Health at the advice of our Data Safety Monitoring Board for reasons of futility. In conclusion, methotrexate when added to UDCA for a median period of 7.6 years had no effect on the course of PBC treated with UDCA alone.     

Treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis: Use of ursodeoxycholic acid

Considerable progress has been made in the management of cholestatic liver diseases during the past decade. Various therapeutic agents have been proposed and evaluated for treatment of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. These treatments include ursodeoxycholic acid plus immunosuppressive and antiinflammatory drugs such as glucocorticoids, azathioprine, colchicine and methotrexate. Although these two diseases are grouped together as chronic cholestatic liver diseases, there are important differences between them, particularly with respect to response to treatment. Primary biliary cirrhosis responds much better to medical treatment. Ursodeoxycholic acid has emerged as the most commonly used medication in the treatment of these diseases. Ursodeoxycholic acid therapy is safe and has been associated with improvement of biochemical test results for liver function in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. However, questions remain about the long-term efficacy of the drug in halting histologic progression, although ursodeoxycholic acid does improve survival without the need for liver transplantation after 4 years of treatment in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Ursodeoxycholic acid is unproven in the treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis.     

Long-term effects of ursodeoxycholic acid in primary biliary cirrhosis: results of a double-blind controlled multicentric trial. UDCA-Cooperative Group from the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for primary biliary cirrhosis in a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n=192) were randomized to receive 14-16 mg UDCA/kg/day or placebo. Patients underwent a complete history, physical examination, liver chemistries, immunological determinations and liver biopsy at entry and at the end of the trial, which lasted for at least 2 years. Patients were seen every 3 months and the median follow-up was 3.4 years (range 0.3 to 6.1 years). RESULTS: Patients receiving UDCA (99) or placebo (93) were comparable with regard to age, sex, biochemical parameters and liver histology. UDCA treatment was associated with decreases in alkaline phosphatase, gammaglutamyl transferase, alanine aminotransferase, and cholesterol levels, effects which were conspicuous after 3 months of treatment and remained similar during the follow-up. During the study 31 patients (10 receiving UDCA and 21 placebo) discontinued the trial because of noncompliance (n=11), voluntary withdrawal (n=19) or adverse effects (n=1). Treatment failure (death or liver transplantation) was observed in 17 patients receiving UDCA and in 11 patients receiving placebo. Times to death or liver transplantation and to clinical complications were not significantly different in patients receiving UDCA or placebo. Histological analysis indicates that UDCA improved portal inflammation and prevented histological stage progression. By contrast, histological stage as well as ductular proliferation and ductopenia progressed in patients receiving placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Although UDCA treatment did not significantly affect time to death or liver transplantation and to clinical complications, the effects on both cholestasis and liver histology suggest that UDCA is safe and may be useful for preventing the progression of primary biliary cirrhosis.     

Treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis.

Although primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is generally a progressive disease, the rate of progression varies greatly from one patient to another. The terminal phase is characterized by hyperbilirubinaemia (>100 micromol/l), a major decrease in the number of intrahepatic bile ducts, and extensive fibrosis or cirrhosis. It is now well established that orthotopic liver transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients entering the terminal phase of the disease.A variety of therapeutic agents have been proposed for treatment of patients with PBC. However, most have been found ineffective or too toxic to be widely used. In contrast, there is accumulating evidence from large therapeutic trials that long-term administration of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is safe and prolongs survival free of liver transplantation. Treatment with UDCA slows the histological progression and delays the onset of cirrhosis.In patients who have a sub-optimal response to UDCA therapy alone, the combination of colchicine or methotrexate with UDCA has minimal or no additional benefit, whereas that with corticosteroids is more promising but not yet demonstrated.Among causes of non-response to UDCA therapy, the most common is the PBC-autoimmune hepatitis overlap syndrome. The benefit from the combination of corticosteroids and UDCA in this setting is obvious.Further studies are needed to define the patients who are most likely to respond to UDCA therapy and to assess the benefit of combined medical treatments.     

Methotrexate therapy for primary biliary cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE: Preliminary data suggested possible benefits of methotrexate in primary biliary cirrhosis. We assessed the effectiveness of methotrexate use in primary biliary cirrhosis and its tolerance in patients with this disease. METHODS: A total of 110 primary biliary cirrhosis patients began methotrexate 15 mg/wk; for most, ursodeoxycholic acid was added during the study. We analyzed data from patients completing 5 yr of treatment with methotrexate to assess its effect on biochemical and histologic parameters after 5 yr of therapy. Based on an intent to treat analysis, we also compared survival of our patients (n = 110) with that of patients in a previously published, placebo-controlled trial of ursodeoxycholic acid (n = 180). RESULTS: Only half of the study group completed 5 yr of methotrexate therapy. Therapy did not prevent progression of disease, as indicated by a rising Mayo risk score. Portal fibrosis tended to remain the same. Methotrexate did not diminish the risk of death or liver transplantation when compared with ursodeoxycholic acid or placebo; however, ursodeoxycholic acid use decreased the risk of death or transplant (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Methotrexate is not well tolerated in primary biliary cirrhosis. The toxicity of methotrexate and its inability to prevent complications of progressive liver disease or improve survival and the need for liver transplantation limits its utility. The benefits of ursodeoxycholic acid were again confirmed.     

Is serum bilirubin concentration the only valid prognostic marker in primary biliary cirrhosis?

From the many prognostic models for primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) patients based on Cox's regression analysis, the Mayo model has gained the most popularity and was successfully validated in some centers. The aim of our study was to validate the Mayo survival model for Polish PBC patients and, in case of its inapplicability, to select prognostic variables and to create time-fixed and time-dependent survival models for the patients. We used database information on patients from 6 medical centers in Poland, fulfilling clinical, serological, and/or pathological criteria of PBC. The Mayo model was validated using data from 116 PBC patients. The time-fixed and time-dependent models were created using data on clinical and biochemical variables used in the Mayo model from 162 and 208 patients, respectively. The Mayo model validation was performed graphically and by one-sample log-rank tests after dividing the study sample into 3 groups of high, medium, and low risk. The survival analysis was performed using Cox's proportional hazards regression method on clinical and biochemical variables used in the Mayo model. Treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) was included in the time-dependent analysis. Validation showed that the Mayo model overestimated death risk in Polish PBC patients. Of the variables used in the Mayo model, serum bilirubin concentration appeared to be the only variable of prognostic importance. The analysis shows that serum bilirubin concentration holds most of the prognostic information for our PBC patients irrespective of prior treatment with UDCA.     

Excellent long-term survival in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and biochemical response to ursodeoxycholic Acid

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Because the efficacy of UDCA on long-term outcome of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) has not been completely elucidated, we have assessed the course and survival of patients with PBC treated with UDCA and compared with the survival predicted by the Mayo model and the estimated survival of a standardized population. METHODS: (One hundred ninety-two patients [181 women] with PBC treated with UDCA [15 mg/kg per day] for 1.5-14 years.) Response to treatment was defined by an alkaline phosphatase decrease greater than 40% of baseline values or normal levels after 1 year of treatment. The predicted survival was obtained by the Mayo model and the estimated survival was taken from the standardized matched Spanish population. RESULTS: Seventeen patients died or fulfilled criteria for liver transplantation (8.9%). The observed survival was higher than that predicted by the Mayo model and lower than that of the control population (P < .001). One hundred seventeen patients (61%) responded to treatment. The survival of responders was significantly higher than that predicted by the Mayo model and similar to that estimated for the control population (P = .15). By contrast, the survival of patients without biochemical response was lower than that estimated for the Spanish population (P < .001) although higher than that predicted by the Mayo model. CONCLUSIONS: Biochemical response to UDCA after 1 year is associated with a similar survival to the matched control population, clearly supporting the favorable effects of this treatment in PBC. The suboptimal survival of nonresponders identifies the group for further treatments.     

Old and new treatments for primary biliary cholangitis

Primary biliary cholangitis (formerly primary biliary cirrhosis) is a rare progressive cholestatic liver disease, whose hallmark features include a persistently elevated alkaline phosphatase level, presence of anti‐mitochondrial antibodies and characteristic histology. Since 1998, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), a bile acid, has been the only available therapeutic agent. Primary biliary cholangitis is associated with the development of end‐stage liver disease, increased morbidity and mortality. UDCA has been shown to improve serum biochemistries, histology and delay the need for liver transplantation. The clinical issue is that approximately 25%‐40% of patients do not respond to this standard therapy. In recent years, many trials have investigated alternative and adjunctive treatments, leading to the recent approval of obeticholic acid, an analogue of chenodeoxycholic acid, which has shown significant and sustained reductions in alkaline phosphatase levels in combination with UDCA. Obeticholic acid has rapidly been embraced as a new agent to improve the biochemical profile in refractory patients, in addition to being approved for use as monotherapy in patients who cannot tolerate UDCA. There are several other studies and targets which are being investigated. This review is intended to highlight the benefits of UDCA, educate the reader on the newly available obeticholic acid, and to summarize the many ongoing trials and therapeutic targets being investigated in attempts to control and cure primary biliary cholangitis.     

Predicting outcome in primary biliary cirrhosis

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is a slowly progressive autoimmune liver disease that may ultimately result in liver failure and premature death. Predicting outcome is of key importance in clinical management and an essential requirement for patients counselling and timing of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. The following factors are associated with progressive disease and worse outcome: young age at diagnosis, male gender, histological presence of cirrhosis, accelerated marked ductopenia in relation to the amount of fibrosis, high serum bilirubin, low serum albumin levels, high serum alkaline phosphatase levels, esophageal varices, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and lack of biochemical response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). The prognostic significance of symptoms at diagnosis is uncertain. UDCA therapy and liver transplantation have a significant beneficial effect on the outcome of the disease. The Mayo risk score in PBC can be used for estimating individual prognosis. The Newcastle Varices in PBC Score may be a useful clinical tool to predict the risk for development of esophageal varices. Male gender, cirrhosis and non-response to UDCA therapy in particular, are risk factors for development of HCC.     

The effect of ursodeoxycholic acid therapy on the natural course of primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We used a multistate modeling approach to assess the effect of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) therapy on the natural course of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), which remains controversial. METHODS: Our population included 262 patients with PBC who had received 13-15 mg/kg UDCA daily for a mean of 8 years (range, 1-22 years). Data were analyzed using a multistate Markov model, with histologic stage progression, death, and orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) as main end points. Survival without OLT was compared with that predicted by the updated Mayo model and with the expected survival in the control population. RESULTS: Forty-five patients developed cirrhosis, 20 underwent OLT, and 16 died by the censor date. Ten deaths were due to liver disease. The overall survival rates were 92% at 10 years and 82% at 20 years. Survival rates without OLT were 84% and 66% at 10 and 20 years, respectively, which were slightly lower than the survival rate of an age- and sex-matched control population (relative risk [RR], 1.4; P = .1) but better than the spontaneous survival rate as predicted by the updated Mayo model (RR, .5; P < .01). The survival rate of patients in stage 1 and 2 was similar to that in the control population (RR, .8; P = .5), whereas the probability of death or OLT remained significantly increased in treated patients in late histologic stages (RR, 2.2; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with UDCA alone normalizes the survival rate of patients with PBC when given at early stages. However, there is a continued need for new therapeutic options in patients with advanced disease.     

Treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis

Primary biliary cirrhosis is a chronic liver disease of unknown etiology, characterized by inflammation and destruction of the intrahepatic biliary ducts, resulting in chronic cholestasis and eventually cirrhosis. The main clinical manifestations consists of pruritus, jaundice, xanthomas, and the consequences of intestinal malabsorption, including vitamin deficiencies and osteodystrophy. Treatment of PBC is addressed at preventing or relieving the symptoms and clinical consequences of chronic cholestasis, and also at correcting the bile duct abnormalities by specific treatments. Pruritus is treated with cholestyramine, but in some cases other drugs, such as rifampicin or opioid antagonists are needed. Bisphosphanates are effective for increasing bone mass in osteopenic patients. Vitamin D and cAlcium supplements are also recommended, particularly in patients with severe cholestasis. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has become the standard treatment (13-15 mg/kg/day), resulting in marked relieving of cholestasis. UDCA also prevents the histological progression of the disease, although the effects on survival are less apparent. Small trials of combination therapy using UDCA with methotrexate, colchicine, or prednisone, have been reported but have not shown any increased efficacy over UDCA therapy. Liver transplantation is the only treatment available when cholestasis progresses, with very good survival rates.     

Prognostic factors and long-term effects of ursodeoxycholic acid on liver biochemical parameters in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Dutch Multi-Centre PBC Study Group.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Serum bilirubin is a prognostic factor in untreated primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), but this has been less extensively documented for patients treated with UDCA. The aims of this study were to define the effects of UDCA on serum liver tests and to assess prognostic factors in patients on prolonged UDCA treatment. METHODS: Analysis of laboratory parameters obtained before and during treatment with UDCA of 203 PBC patients who were followed for a mean of 48 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the prognostic value of pre-entry and follow-up variables with respect to treatment failure and survival. RESULTS: Actuarial 5-year incidences of treatment failure and transplantion-free survival were 27 and 79%, respectively. According to the univariate analysis the following variables were significantly associated with prognosis: pre-entry presence of cirrhosis and pre-treatment levels of serum bilirubin and albumin, bilirubin levels during follow-up, the occurrence of biochemical remission and normalisation of serum bilirubin. Multivariate analysis revealed that bilirubin during follow-up was the best predictor. Alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase and IgM decreased significantly during the first 6 months of treatment and subsequently remained at this lower level. Serum bilirubin showed the same initial pattern, but a significant increase was observed after 4 years of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Serum bilirubin in both UDCA-treated and untreated patients is the most powerful predictor of prognosis for PBC. The partial therapeutic efficacy of UDCA is illustrated by the finding that serum bilirubin, in contrast to alkaline phosphatase and the transaminases, appears to increase after 4 years of treatment.     

Sequential changes in serum levels of individual bile acids in patients with chronic cholestatic liver disease

In order to determine the value of serum bile acids in predicting the course of chronic cholestatic liver diseases, we measured individual serum bile acids serially, using high-performance liquid chromatography, over a 4 year observation period in 12 patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and six patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. The changes in individual serum bile acids and the ratios thereof, conventional liver tests and Child-Turcotte and Mayo scores were compared between survivors (n= 10) and patients who underwent liver transplantation for (n= 3) or died of the liver disease (n= 5). Patients with a serum total chenodeoxycholic acid concentration at study entry that exceded 15 μmol/L were 10 times more likely to die or need a liver transplant in the following 4 years than those with chenodeoxycholic acid levels < 15 μmol/L (P < 0.05). None of the other biochemical parameters or clinicopathological scores could similarly discriminate between the two groups at entry. Time-dependent analyses for the cholic acid/chenodeoxycholic acid ratio, serum total bilirubin and albumin concentrations and Child-Turcotte and Mayo scores were able to differentiate between primary sclerosing cholangitis patients who died or were transplanted and those who were not, whereas age of the patients and other parameters did not. The taurocholic acid /taurochenodeoxycholic acid ratio fell during progression of primary biliary cirrhosis but rose in temporal relationship with primary sclerosing cholangitis. This differential pattern of change was unique compared with other clinical and laboratory indices. In conclusion, serum chenodeoxycholic acid levels and the cholic acid /chenodeoxycholic acid ratio in both diseases were independent indices that allowed for the prediction of survival or the need for liver transplantation. These indices are worthy of further examination in a larger group of patients as prognostic criteria for chronic cholestatic liver disease and in the assessment of the efficacy of therapeutic interventions, including liver transplantation.     

Ursodeoxycholic Acid Therapy in Patients with Primary Biliary Cholangitis with Limited Liver Transplantation Availability

IntroductionThere is little information on survival rates of patients with primary biliary cholangtis (PBC) in developing countries. This is particularly true in Latin America, where the number of liver transplants performed remains extremely low for patients with advanced liver disease who fulfill criteria for liver transplantation. The goal of this study was to compare survival rate of patients with PBC in developing countries who were treated with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) versus survival of patients who received other treatments (OT) without UDCA, prescribed before the UDCA era.Material and MethodsA retrospective study was performed, including records of 78 patients with PBC in the liver unit in a third level referral hospital in Mexico City. Patients were followed for five years from initial diagnosis until death related to liver disease or to the end of the study. Patients received UDCA (15 mg/kg/per day) (n = 41) or OT (n = 37) before introduction of UDCA in Mexico.ResultsResponse to treatment was higher in the group that received UDCA. In the five years of follow-up, survival rates were significantly higher in the UDCA group than in the OT group. The hazard ratio of death was higher in the OT group vs. UDCA group, HR 8.78 (95% CI, 2.52-30.61); Mayo Risk Score and gender were independently associated with the risk of death.ConclusionsThe study confirms that the use of UDCA in countries with a limited liver transplant program increases survival in comparison to other treatments used before the introduction of UDCA.     

Survival and symptom progression in a geographically based cohort of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis: follow-up for up to 28 years

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although several excellent studies have described the natural history of primary biliary cirrhosis, most were reported from tertiary referral centers. We examined the prognosis of primary biliary cirrhosis in a comprehensive geographically defined cohort. METHODS: We followed up 770 primary biliary cirrhosis patients prevalent between January 1987 and December 1994 until death, transplantation, or censor on January 1, 2000, by interview and review of case notes and death certificates. Analysis of survival data was performed with Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression. RESULTS: Median patient survival was 9.3 years from diagnosis. Patient age, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, and bilirubin at diagnosis independently predicted survival in Cox modeling. Prothrombin time and histologic stage did not independently affect survival. Observed survival was predicted well by this model and by the Mayo prognostic score (R2(M) = 0.37 and 0.18, respectively; R2(M) is a likelihood-based measure of the percentage information gain from the model due to covariates). Forty-two percent of deaths were caused by liver disease. Thirty-nine patients had liver transplantations by the censor date. Survival was much poorer than for an age- and sex-matched control population (standardized mortality ratio = 2.87 [1.73 excluding liver deaths]). The most common symptoms at diagnosis were pruritus (18.9%) and fatigue (21.0%). Twenty-six percent of patients developed liver failure by 10 years after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Although primary biliary cirrhosis is often now diagnosed at an early stage, the diagnosis still carries important prognostic implications. A significant proportion of patients develop liver failure, require transplantation, or die prematurely after this diagnosis.     

Prolonged follow-up of patients in the U.S. multicenter trial of ursodeoxycholic acid for primary biliary cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) have not demonstrated improvement in survival during the placebo-controlled phases of these trials. Analyses purporting to demonstrate a survival advantage of UDCA are largely dependent on data obtained after the placebo phases were terminated, and placebo-treated patients were offered open-label UDCA. After completion of our 2-yr placebo-controlled trial of UDCA in which we observed no survival benefit for UDCA, we provided the patients with open-label UDCA to see if delay in providing UDCA for 2 yr had any effect on subsequent liver transplantation or death without liver transplantation. METHODS: In our previously reported 2-yr placebo-controlled trial, 151 patients with PBC were randomized to receive either UDCA (n = 77) or placebo (n = 74). The number of patients who progressed to liver transplantation or death without transplantation were similar in both the groups, 12 (16%) in the UDCA-treated and 11 (15%) in placebo-treated patients. All the patients were then offered open-label UDCA, with 61 original UDCA and 56 original placebo-treated patients now taking UDCA in an extended open-label phase of the trial. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in the number of patients who underwent liver transplantation or died without liver transplantation in the open-label phase of the trial. Moreover, no difference in the time to these endpoints was seen over the period of observation of as long as 6 yr from the time of initial randomization. CONCLUSIONS: Results of open-label extensions of previous conducted placebo-controlled trials of UDCA in PBC leave uncertain whether UDCA impacts significantly on liver transplantation and death without liver transplantation in patients with PBC.