Sleep well. Untangling the role of melatonin MT1 and MT2 receptors in sleep

The pharmacological potential of targeting selectively melatonin MT1 or MT2 receptors has not yet been exploited in medicine. Research using selective MT1/MT2 receptor ligands and MT1/MT2 receptor knockout mice has indicated that the activation of MT2 receptors selectively increases non‐rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep whereas MT1 receptors seem mostly implicated in the regulation of REM sleep. Moreover, MT1 knockout mice show an increase in NREM sleep, while MT2 knockout a decrease, suggesting an opposite role of these two receptors. A recent paper in mice by Sharma et al (J Pineal Res, 2018, e12498) found that MT1 but not MT2 receptors are expressed on orexin neurons in the perifornical lateral hypothalamus (PFH). Moreover, after injecting melatonin or luzindole into the mouse PFH, the authors suggest that melatonin promotes NREM sleep because activates PFH MT1 receptors, which in turn inhibit orexin neurons that are important in promoting arousal and maintaining wakefulness. In this commentary, we have critically commented on some of these findings on the bases of previous literature. In addition, we highlighted the fact that no conclusions could be drawn on the melatonin receptor subtype mediating the effects of melatonin on sleep because the authors used the non‐selective MT1/MT2 receptors antagonist luzindole. More solid research should further characterize the pharmacological function of these two melatonin receptors in sleep.     

The antidepressant-like effect of the melatonin receptor ligand luzindole in mice during forced swimming requires expression of MT2 but not MT1 melatonin receptors

We previously reported an antidepressant-like effect in C3H/HeN mice during the forced swimming test (FST) following treatment with the MT1/MT2 melatonin receptor ligand, luzindole. This study investigated the role melatonin receptors (MT1 and/or MT2) may play in the effect of luzindole in the FST using C3H/HeN mice with a genetic deletion of either MT1 (MT1KO) or MT2 (MT2KO) melatonin receptors. In the light phase (ZT 9-11), luzindole (30 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly decreased immobility during swimming in both wild type (WT) (135.6 +/- 25.3 s, n = 7) and MT(1)KO (132.6 +/- 13.3 s, n = 8) as compared with vehicle-treated mice (WT: 207.1 +/- 6.0 s, n = 7; MT1KO: 209.5 +/- 6.2 s, n = 8) (P < 0.001). In the dark phase (ZT 20-22), luzindole also decreased time of immobility in both WT (89.5 +/- 13.9 s, n = 8) and MT1KO (66.5 +/- 6.4 s, n = 8) mice as compared with the vehicle treated (WT: 193.8 +/- 3.5, n = 6; MT1KO: 176.6 +/- 6.2 s, n = 8) (P < 0.001). Genetic disruption of the MT1 gene did not alter the diurnal rhythm of serum melatonin in MT1KO mice (ZT 9-11: 1.3 +/- 0.6 pg/mL, n = 7; ZT 20-22: 10.3 +/- 1.1 pg/mL, n = 8) as compared with WT (ZT 9-11: 1.4 +/- 0.7 pg/mL; ZT 20-22: 10.6 pg/mL). Swimming did not alter the serum melatonin diurnal rhythm in WT and MT1KO mice. Decreases in immobility of WT and MT1KO mice by luzindole treatment were not affected by gender or age (3 months versus 8 months). In contrast, luzindole did not decrease immobility during the FST in MT2KO mice. We conclude that the antidepressant-like effect of luzindole may be mediated through blockade of MT2 rather than MT1 melatonin receptors.     

Melatonin reduces inflammatory response in human intestinal epithelial cells stimulated by interleukin‐1β

Melatonin is the main secretory product of the pineal gland, and it is involved in the regulation of periodic events. A melatonin production independent of the photoperiod is typical of the gut. However, the local physiological role of melatonin at the intestinal tract is poorly characterized. In this study, we evaluated the anti‐inflammatory activities of melatonin in an in vitro model of inflamed intestinal epithelium. To this purpose, we assessed different parameters usually associated with intestinal inflammation using IL‐1β‐stimulated Caco‐2 cells. Differentiated monolayers of Caco‐2 cells were preincubated with melatonin (1 nmol/L‐50 μmol/L) and then exposed to IL‐1β. After each treatment, different inflammatory mediators, DNA‐breakage, and global DNA methylation status were assayed. To evaluate the involvement of melatonin membrane receptors, we also exposed differentiated monolayers to melatonin in the presence of luzindole, a MT1 and MT2 antagonist. Our results showed that melatonin, at concentrations similar to those obtained in the lumen gut after ingestion of dietary supplements for the treatment of sleep disorders, was able to attenuate the inflammatory response induced by IL‐1β. Anti‐inflammatory effects were expressed as both a decrease of the levels of inflammatory mediators, including IL‐6, IL‐8, COX‐2, and NO, and a reduced increase in paracellular permeability. Moreover, the protection was associated with a reduced NF‐κB activation and a prevention of DNA demethylation. Conversely, luzindole did not reverse the melatonin inhibition of stimulated‐IL‐6 release. In conclusion, our findings suggest that melatonin, through a local action, can modulate inflammatory processes at the intestinal level, offering new opportunities for a multimodal management of IBD.     

Inverse agonist exposure enhances ligand binding and G protein activation of the human MT1 melatonin receptor, but leads to receptor down-regulation

Melatonin binds and activates G protein-coupled melatonin receptors. The density and affinity of the endogenous melatonin receptors change throughout the 24-hr day, and the exposure of recombinant melatonin receptors to melatonin often results in desensitization of the receptors. Receptor density, G protein activation and expression level were analyzed in CHO cell lines stably expressing the human MT1 receptors after 1 or 72 hr of exposure to melatonin (agonist, 10 nm) and luzindole (antagonist/inverse agonist, 10 microm). The 72-hr exposure to luzindole significantly increased the apparent receptor density in cell lines with both high and low MT1 receptor expression levels (MT1(high) and MT1(low) cells, respectively). In the constitutively active MT1(high) cells, luzindole pretreatment also stimulated the functional response to melatonin in [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding assays, whereas melatonin pretreatment attenuated the functional response at both time points. Receptor ELISA was used to analyze the cell membrane and total expression level of the MT1 receptor in intact and permeabilized cells, respectively. Luzindole pretreatment decreased the total cellular level of MT1 receptor in the MT1(high) cells at both time points but increased the cell surface expression of MT1 receptor at 72 hr. Melatonin significantly decreased MT1 receptor cell surface expression only in MT1(high) cells after a 1-hr treatment. These results indicate that melatonin treatment desensitizes MT1 receptors, whereas luzindole increases ligand binding and G-protein activation. Luzindole also stimulates downregulation of the MT1 receptor protein, interfering with the synthesis and/or degradation of the receptor.     

Melatonin inhibits outward delayed rectifier potassium currents in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neuron via intracellular indole-related domains

In the present study, we investigated the effect of melatonin on the outward delayed rectifier potassium currents (IK) in CA1 pyramidal neurons of rat hippocampal slices using patch-clamp technique in whole-cell configuration. In a concentration-dependent manner, melatonin caused a reduction of IK with a half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 3.75 mm. The inhibitory effect had rapid onset and was readily reversible. Melatonin shifted steady-state inactivation of IK in hyperpolarizing direction but did not alter its steady-state activation. Neither luzindole, an MT1/MT2 receptor antagonist, nor prazosin, an MT3 receptor antagonist, blocked melatonin-induced current reduction. The results indicate that melatonin-induced IK inhibition was not via activation of its own membrane receptors. 5-Hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), a melatonin precursor and an agonist of serotonin receptors, when it was given in pipette internal solution but not bath solution, produced a similar inhibitory effect to that of melatonin. Moreover, indole, a major component of melatonin, reversibly and dose dependently inhibited IK with an IC50 of 3.44 mm. Present results suggest that melatonin inhibits IK in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons probably through its interaction with the intracellular indole-related domains of potassium channels.     

Beneficial effects of melatonin on in vitro bovine embryonic development are mediated by melatonin receptor 1

In the current study, a fundamental question, that is, the mechanisms related to the beneficial effects of melatonin on mammalian embryonic development, was addressed. To examine the potential beneficial effects of melatonin on bovine embryonic development, different concentrations of melatonin (10^?11, 10^?9, 10^?7, 10^?5, 10^?3 m ) were incubated with fertilized embryos. Melatonin in the range of 10^?11 to 10^?5 m significantly promoted embryonic development both in early culture medium (CR1aa +3 mg/mL BSA) and in later culture medium (CR1aa + 6%FBS). The most effective concentrations applied in the current studies were 10^?9 and 10^?7 m . Using quantitative real‐time PCR with immunofluorescence and Western blot assays, the expression of melatonin receptor MT1 and MT2 genes was identified in bovine embryos. Further studies indicate that the beneficial effects of melatonin on bovine embryo development were mediated by the MT1 receptor. This is based on the facts that luzindole, a nonselective MT1 and MT2 antagonist, blocked the effect on melatonin‐induced embryo development, while 4‐P‐PDOT, a selective MT2 antagonist, had little effect. Mechanistic explorations uncovered that melatonin application during bovine embryonic development significantly up‐regulated the expression of antioxidative (Gpx4, SOD1, bcl‐2) and developmentally important genes (SLC2A1, DNMT1A, and DSC2) while down‐regulating expression of pro‐apoptotic genes (P53, BAX, and Caspase‐3). The results obtained from the current studies provide new information regarding the mechanisms by which melatonin promotes bovine embryonic development under both in vitro and in vivo conditions.     

Protection of melatonin in experimental models of newborn hypoxic‐ischemic brain injury through MT1 receptor

The function of melatonin as a protective agent against newborn hypoxic‐ischemic (H‐I) brain injury is not yet well studied, and the mechanisms by which melatonin causes neuroprotection in neurological diseases are still evolving. This study was designed to investigate whether expression of MT1 receptors is reduced in newborn H‐I brain injury and whether the protective action of melatonin is by alterations of the MT1 receptors. We demonstrated that there was significant reduction in MT1 receptors in ischemic brain of mouse pups in vivo following H‐I brain injury and that melatonin offers neuroprotection through upregulation of MT1 receptors. The role of MT1 receptors was further supported by observation of increased mortality in MT1 knockout mice following H‐I brain injury and the reversal of the inhibitory role of melatonin on mitochondrial cell death pathways by the melatonin receptor antagonist, luzindole. These data demonstrate that melatonin mediates its neuroprotective effect in mouse models of newborn H‐I brain injury, at least in part, by the restoration of MT1 receptors, the inhibition of mitochondrial cell death pathways and the suppression of astrocytic and microglial activation.     

Melatonin influences somatostatin secretion from human pancreatic δ‐cells via MT1 and MT2 receptors

Melatonin is an effector of the diurnal clock on pancreatic islets. The membrane receptor‐transmitted inhibitory influence of melatonin on insulin secretion is well established and contrasts with the reported stimulation of glucagon release from α‐cells. Virtually, nothing is known concerning the melatonin‐mediated effects on islet δ‐cells. Analysis of a human pancreatic δ‐cell model, the cell line QGP‐1, and the use of a somatostatin‐specific radioimmunoassay showed that melatonin primarily has an inhibitory effect on somatostatin secretion in the physiological concentration range. In the pharmacological range, melatonin elicited slightly increased somatostatin release from δ‐cells. Cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) is the major second messenger dose‐dependently stimulating somatostatin secretion, in experiments employing the membrane‐permeable 8‐Br‐cAMP. 8‐Br‐cyclic guanosine monophosphate proved to be of only minor relevance to somatostatin release. As the inhibitory effect of 1 nm melatonin was reversed after incubation of QGP‐1 cells with the nonselective melatonin receptor antagonist luzindole, but not with the MT2‐selective antagonist 4‐P‐PDOT (4‐phenyl‐2‐propionamidotetraline), an involvement of the MT1 receptor can be assumed. Somatostatin release from the δ‐cells at low glucose concentrations was significantly inhibited during co‐incubation with 1 nm melatonin, an effect which was less pronounced at higher glucose levels. Transient expression experiments, overexpressing MT1, MT2, or a deletion variant as a control, indicated that the MT1 and not the MT2 receptor was the major transmitter of the inhibitory melatonin effect. These data point to a significant influence of melatonin on pancreatic δ‐cells and on somatostatin release.     

A unified model of melatonin, 6‐sulfatoxymelatonin,and sleep dynamics

A biophysical model of the key aspects of melatonin synthesis and excretion has been developed, which is able to predict experimental dynamics of melatonin in plasma and saliva, and of its urinary metabolite 6‐sulfatoxymelatonin (aMT6s). This new model is coupled to an established model of arousal dynamics, which predicts sleep and circadian dynamics based on light exposure and times of wakefulness. The combined model thus predicts melatonin levels over the sleep‐wake/dark‐light cycle and enables prediction of melatonin‐based circadian phase markers, such as dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) and aMT6s acrophase under conditions of normal sleep and circadian misalignment. The model is calibrated and tested against group average data from 10 published experimental studies and is found to reproduce quantitatively the key dynamics of melatonin and aMT6s, including the timing of release and amplitude, as well as response to controlled lighting and shift work.     

The inhibition of apoptosis by melatonin in VSC4.1 motoneurons exposed to oxidative stress,glutamate excitotoxicity,or TNF‐α toxicity involves membrane melatonin receptors

Abstract: Loss of motoneurons may underlie some of the deficits in motor function associated with the central nervous system (CNS) injuries and diseases. We tested whether melatonin, a potent antioxidant and free radical scavenger, would prevent motoneuron apoptosis following exposure to toxins and whether this neuroprotection is mediated by melatonin receptors. Exposure of VSC4.1 motoneurons to either 50 μm H₂O₂, 25 μm glutamate (LGA), or 50 ng/mL tumor necrosis factor‐alpha (TNF‐α) for 24 h caused significant increases in apoptosis, as determined by Wright staining and ApopTag assay. Analyses of mRNA and proteins showed increased expression and activities of stress kinases and cysteine proteases and loss of mitochondrial membrane potential during apoptosis. These insults also caused increases in intracellular free [Ca²⁺] and activities of calpain and caspases. Cells exposed to stress stimuli for 15 min were then treated with 200 nm melatonin. Post‐treatment of cells with melatonin attenuated production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and phosphorylation of p38, MAPK, and JNK1, prevented cell death, and maintained whole‐cell membrane potential, indicating functional neuroprotection. Melatonin receptors (MT1 and MT2) were upregulated following treatment with melatonin. To confirm the involvement of MT1 and MT2 in providing neuroprotection, cells were post‐treated (20 min) with 10 μm luzindole (melatonin receptor antagonist). Luzindole significantly attenuated melatonin‐induced neuroprotection, suggesting that melatonin worked, at least in part, via its receptors to prevent VSC4.1 motoneuron apoptosis. Results suggest that neuroprotection rendered by melatonin to motoneurons is receptor mediated and melatonin may be an effective neuroprotective agent to attenuate motoneuron death in CNS injuries and diseases.     

Melatonin inhibits nucleus pulposus (NP) cell proliferation and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling via the melatonin membrane receptors mediated PI3K‐Akt pathway

Pinealectomy in vertebrates accelerated intervertebral disk degeneration (IDD). However, the potential mechanisms, particularly melatonin's role, are still to be clarified. In this study, for first time, melatonin membrane receptors of MT1 and MT2 were found to be present in the human intervertebral disk tissues and nucleus pulposus (NP) cells, respectively. Melatonin treatment significantly inhibited NP cell proliferation in dose‐dependent manner. Accordingly, melatonin down‐regulated gene expression of cyclin D1, PCNA, matrix metallopeptidase‐3, and matrix metallopeptidase‐9 and upregulated gene expression of collagen type II alpha 1 chain and aggrecan in NP cells. These effects of melatonin were blocked by luzindole, a nonspecific melatonin membrane receptor antagonist. Signaling pathway analysis indicated that in the intervertebral disk tissues and NP cells, melatonin acted on MT1/2 and subsequently reduced phosphorylation of phosphoinositide 3‐kinase p85 regulatory subunit, phosphoinositide‐dependent kinase‐1, and Akt. The results indicate that melatonin is a crucial regulator of NP cell function and plays a vital role in prevention of IDD.     

Melatonin antagonizes the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis via mitochondrial targeting of Bcl-2

Abstract:  We have recently shown that melatonin antagonizes damage-induced apoptosis by interaction with the MT-1/MT-2 plasma membrane receptors. Here, we show that melatonin interferes with the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis at the mitochondrial level. In response to an apoptogenic stimulus, melatonin allows mitochondrial translocation of the pro-apoptotic protein Bax, but it impairs its activation/dimerization The downstream apoptotic events, i.e. cytochrome c release, caspase 9 and 3 activation and nuclear vesiculation are equally impaired, indicating that melatonin interferes with Bax activation within mitochondria. Interestingly, we found that melatonin induces a strong re-localization of Bcl-2, the main Bax antagonist to mitochondria, suggesting that Bax activation may in fact be antagonized by Bcl-2 at the mitochondrial level. Indeed, we inhibit the melatonin anti-apoptotic effect (i) by silencing Bcl-2 with small interfering RNAs, or with small-molecular inhibitors targeted at the BH3 binding pocket in Bcl-2 (i.e. the one interacting with Bax); and (ii) by inhibiting melatonin-induced Bcl-2 mitochondrial re-localization with the MT1/MT2 receptor antagonist luzindole. This evidence provides a mechanism that may explain how melatonin through interaction with the MT1/MT2 receptors, elicits a pathway that interferes with the Bcl-2 family, thus modulating the cell life/death balance.     

Melatonin modulation of intracellular signaling pathways in hepatocarcinoma HepG2 cell line: role of the MT1 receptor

Melatonin reduces proliferation in many different cancer cell lines. However, studies on the oncostatic effects of melatonin in hepatocarcinoma are limited. We have previously demonstrated that melatonin administration induces cycle arrest, apoptosis, and changes in the expression of its specific receptors in HepG2 human hepatocarcinoma cells. In this study, we used the receptor antagonist luzindole to assess the contribution of MT1 melatonin membrane receptor to melatonin effects on cell viability, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPKs) activation, and cAMP levels. Additionally, effects of MT1 inhibition on mRNA levels of cytosolic quinone reductase type-2 (NQO2) receptor and nuclear retinoic acid-related orphan receptor alpha (RORα) were tested. Melatonin, at 1000 and 2500 μm, significantly reduced cell viability. Pre-incubation with luzindole partially inhibited the effects of melatonin on cell viability. Melatonin at 2500 μm significantly reduced cAMP levels, and this effect was partially blocked by luzindole. Both melatonin concentrations increased the expression of phosphorylated p38, ERK, and JNK. ERK activation was completely abolished in the presence of luzindole. NQO2 but not RORα mRNA level significantly increased in luzindole-treated cells. Results obtained provide evidence that the melatonin effects on cell viability and proliferation in HepG2 cells are partially mediated through the MT1 membrane receptor, which seems to be related also with melatonin modulation of cAMP and ERK activation. This study also highlights a possible interplay between MT1 and NQO2 melatonin receptors in liver cancer cells.     

Antinociceptive effects of novel melatonin receptor agonists in mouse models of abdominal pain

AIM: To characterize the antinociceptive action of the novel melatonin receptor(MT) agonists, Neu-P11 and Neu-P12 in animal models of visceral pain. METHODS: Visceral pain was induced by intracolonic(ic) application of mustard oil or capsaicin solution or by intraperitoneal(ip) administration of acetic acid. Neu-P11, Neu-P12, or melatonin were given ip or orally and their effects on pain-induced behavioral responses were evaluated. To identify the receptors involved, thenon-selective MT1/MT2 receptor antagonist luzindole, the MT2 receptor antagonist 4-P-PDOT, or the μ-opioid receptor antagonist naloxone were injected ip or intracerebroventricularly(icv) prior to the induction of pain. RESULTS: Orally and ip administered melatonin, Neu-P11, and Neu-P12 reduced pain responses in a dose-dependent manner. Neu-P12 was more effective and displayed longer duration of action compared to melatonin. The antinociceptive effects of Neu-P11 or Neu-P12 were antagonized by ip or icv. administered naloxone. Intracerebroventricularly, but not ip administration of luzindole or 4-P-PDOT blocked the antinociceptive actions of Neu-P11 or Neu-P12. CONCLUSION: Neu-P12 produced the most potent and long-lasting antinociceptive effect. Further development of Neu-P12 for future treatment of abdominal pain seems promising.     

Sleep–wake regulation and hypocretin–melatonin interaction in zebrafish

In mammals, hypocretin/orexin (HCRT) neuropeptides are important sleep–wake regulators and HCRT deficiency causes narcolepsy. In addition to fragmented wakefulness, narcoleptic mammals also display sleep fragmentation, a less understood phenotype recapitulated in the zebrafish HCRT receptor mutant (hcrtr−/−). We therefore used zebrafish to study the potential mediators of HCRT-mediated sleep consolidation. Similar to mammals, zebrafish HCRT neurons express vesicular glutamate transporters indicating conservation of the excitatory phenotype. Visualization of the entire HCRT circuit in zebrafish stably expressing hcrt:EGFP revealed parallels with established mammalian HCRT neuroanatomy, including projections to the pineal gland, where hcrtr mRNA is expressed. As pineal-produced melatonin is a major sleep-inducing hormone in zebrafish, we further studied how the HCRT and melatonin systems interact functionally. mRNA level of arylalkylamine-N-acetyltransferase (AANAT2), a key enzyme of melatonin synthesis, is reduced in hcrtr−/− pineal gland during the night. Moreover, HCRT perfusion of cultured zebrafish pineal glands induces melatonin release. Together these data indicate that HCRT can modulate melatonin production at night. Furthermore, hcrtr−/− fish are hypersensitive to melatonin, but not other hypnotic compounds. Subthreshold doses of melatonin increased the amount of sleep and consolidated sleep in hcrtr−/− fish, but not in the wild-type siblings. These results demonstrate the existence of a functional HCRT neurons-pineal gland circuit able to modulate melatonin production and sleep consolidation.     

Effect of MT1 melatonin receptor deletion on melatonin-mediated phase shift of circadian rhythms in the C57BL/6 mouse

In the mouse suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), melatonin activates MT1 and MT2 G-protein coupled receptors, which are involved primarily in inhibition of neuronal firing and phase shift of circadian rhythms. This study investigated the ability of melatonin to phase shift circadian rhythms in wild type (WT) and MT1 melatonin receptor knockout (KO) C57BL/6 mice. In WT mice, melatonin (90 microg/mouse, s.c.) administered at circadian time 10 (CT10; CT12 onset of activity) significantly phase advanced the onset of the circadian activity rhythm (0.60 +/- 0.09 hr, n = 41) when compared with vehicle treated controls (-0.02 +/- 0.07 hr, n = 28) (P < 0.001). In contrast, C57 MT1KO mice treated with melatonin did not phase shift circadian activity rhythms (-0.10 +/- 0.12 hr, n = 42) when compared with vehicle treated mice (-0.12 +/- 0.07 hr, n = 43). Similarly, in the C57 MT1KO mouse melatonin did not accelerate re-entrainment to a new dark onset after an abrupt advance of the dark cycle. In contrast, melatonin (3 and 10 pm) significantly phase advanced circadian rhythm of neuronal firing in SCN brain slices independent of genotype with an identical maximal shift at 10 pm (C57 WT: 3.61 +/- 0.38 hr, n = 3; C57 MT(1)KO: 3.45 +/- 0.11 hr, n = 4). Taken together, these results suggest that melatonin-mediated phase advances of circadian rhythms of neuronal firing in the SCN in vitro may involve activation of the MT2 receptor while in vivo activation of the MT1 and possibly the MT2 receptor may be necessary for the expression of melatonin-mediated phase shifts of overt circadian activity rhythms.     

Melatonin inhibits nicotinic currents in cultured rat cerebellar granule neurons

There is limited data regarding the effects of melatonin on the activity of neuronal acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) themselves. This study analyzes the effects of low concentrations of melatonin on nicotine-evoked currents from cerebellar granule neurons (CGNs) in culture. Using electrophysiological and Ca(2+)-imaging techniques, it was found a subset of rat CGNs to which nicotine application elicited both intracellular Ca(2+) transients and inward whole-cell currents. These responses were mediated by heteromeric nAChRs, as assessed by their sensitivity to nicotine and time constant of current decay. Preincubating the cells with low melatonin concentrations (down to 1 pm) significantly reduced the current amplitude in a dose-dependent manner, without affecting the receptor's apparent affinity and voltage-dependency, nor the current's rise and decay time course. The inhibitory effect of melatonin was significantly reduced by luzindole, a competitive antagonist of both MT(1) and MT(2) melatonin receptors. In conclusion, melatonin inhibits nicotinic currents through non-alpha7 heteromeric nAChRs expressed by CGNs in culture, an effect that appears to be at least partially mediated by melatonin membrane receptors. Direct modulation of nicotinic receptors is accomplished at doses that are likely to be physiologically relevant, thus providing a mechanism through which melatonin circadian rhythmic levels could modulate cholinergic activity.