Initial Clinical Experience with a New Dual Sensor SSIR Pacemaker Controlled by Body Activity and Minute Ventilation

Fourteen patients were implanted with a single chamber dual sensor pacemaker (Legend Plus®) that measures minute ventilation (VE) via variations in impedance between a bipolar lead and the pacemaker case, and activity via a piezoelectric crystal bonded to the pacemaker case. Chronotropic incompetent patients were exercised an a treadmill and a bicycle in dual sensor mode. Activity only indicated pacing rate was measured using a strap-on pacemaker. Both implanted and strap on pacemakers were adjusted to yield a steady-state pacing rate of 100 beats/min during hall walk. Pacing rate, VE, and oxygen uptake (VO₂) were measured continuously. Linear curve fit analysis slopes for plots of VE versus pacing rate during exercise (1.33-1.49) compared favorably to values reported in normals. Peak pacing rates achieved for treadmill and bicycle testing for dual sensor mode were higher than activity mode alone. Slopes of heart rate to VE or VO₂ were not significantly different (P < 0.05) for dual sensor mode in contrast to activity alone. In conclusion, the Legend Plus dual sensor rate adaptive pacing therapy delivered pacing rates more proportional to VE and VO₂ under different types of exercise than rates indicated by a strap-on pacemaker in activity mode.     

Impact of Adaptive Rate Pacing Controlled by a Right Ventricular Impedance Sensor on Cardiac Output in Response to Exercise

COOK, L., et al. : Impact of Adaptive Rate Pacing Controlled by a Right Ventricular Impedance Sensor on Cardiac Output in Response to Exercise. This study examined the effects of adaptive rate pacing controlled by closed-loop right ventricular impedance sensing on exercise hemodynamics. Twelve patients in whom Biotronik INOS²⁺ pacemakers had been implanted 4–6 weeks earlier participated in the study. All patients completed two graded, symptom-limited exercise tests. The pacemaker was programmed to DDDR with an upper rate limit of 75–85% of the age-predicted maximum heart rate and a lower rate limit of 45–60 ppm. Heart rate was recorded continuously. An average of 5 beats during the last 10 seconds of each exercise stage was used in the analysis. Oxygen uptake (VO₂) was measured using open circuit spirometry. The VO₂ values from the final 15 seconds of each exercise stage were used for analysis. Stroke volume and cardiac output were measured during the last minute of each stage using impedance cardiography. The test-retest reliability of heart rate and cardiac output responses to graded exercise was assessed using repeated measures analysis of variance, for which the reliability coefficients were r = 0.993 and r = 0.954, respectively (P < 0.01). There were significant correlations (P < 0.01) between VO₂ and heart rate and between VO₂ and cardiac output, with correlation coefficients of r = 0.907 and r = 0.824, respectively. This method of adaptive rate pacing produced reliable, positive hemodynamic responses to graded exercise on a test-retest basis. (PACE 2003; 26:[Pt. II]:244–247)     

A Randomized Double-Blind, Cross-Over Study of the Linear and Nonlinear Algorithms for the QT Sensing Rate Adaptive Pacemaker

BAIG, M.W., ET AL.: A Randomized Double-Blind, Cross-Over Study of the Linear and Nonlinear Algorithms for the QT Sensing Rate Adaptive Pacemaker. We have compared the pacing rate responses during cardiopulmonary exercise testing in 11 patients (mean 59 years, six female) with implanted QT sensing rate adaptive pacemakers who were randomly programmed to 1-month periods in the linear and nonlinear algorithms using a double-blind, cross-over design. Exercise testing was performed at the end of each month block and symptoms were scored with the MacMaster questionnaire. With exercise, the time to a 10 beats/min increment in rate was significantly less with the nonlinear compared to the linear algorithm (126 sec vs 255 sec, P = 0.02) but there were no significant differences in exercise duration, the peak pacing rate, the peak VO₂, the VO₂ at the anaerobic threshold or the mean correlation coefficients of the pacing rate VO₂ relationship. Rate oscillation occurred in seven patients in the linear algorithm and in two patients in the nonlinear setting. Initial deceleration of the pacing rate at the onset of exercise occurred in seven patients in the linear algorithm and in four patients in the nonlinear setting. The nonlinear algorithm is associated with a faster response time during exercise and fewer instances of rate instability. However, it has not overcome the problem of a dip in the pacing rate at the beginning of exercise. The major difference in the function of the two algorithms is faster initial acceleration with the nonlinear algorithm. This is explained by the significantly higher values of the slope setting at the lower rate limit for the nonlinear versus the linear algorithm (6.3 ms/ms vs 5.1 ms/ms).     

Clinical Observations with a Dual Sensor Rate Adaptive Single Chamber Pacemaker

The Topaz model 515 (Vitatron B.V.) is a dual sensor rate responsive pacemaker for single chamber stimulation. It can be driven by activity counts (ACT) and QT interval measurements. Inappropriate rate modulation due to one sensor can be corrected by "sensor cross-checking." It was implanted in ten patients (20-86 years) of whom seven had complete heart block and atrial arrhythmias. After implantation T-wave amplitude ranged from 0.9mV-3.5 mV. T-wave sensing ranged from 88%–99% in 9/10 patients at the follow-up of 3 weeks. Eight patients remained in default setting of the activity threshold, after evaluation with a short walking test. An exercise test was performed on all patients. In one test, QT sensing was marginal because of lead implantation in the right ventricular outflow tract. Therefore, this pacing rate was only modulated by ACT sensing. All others were tested with equal contribution of information from both sensors (ACT = QT). In 7/9, rate response was satisfactory. When the treadmill was repeated with ACT in five of these seven patients, rate generally accelerated too fast. In one patient the setting was adjusted to "QT > ACT," because of inappropriate acceleration due to activity sensing, in another it was adjusted to "QT < ACT" because of delayed response to activity. The pacing rate and the ACT during treadmill tests in "QT = ACT" mode were more closely correlated in the first 3 minutes, compared with the last 3 minutes. We feel that rate modulation with this new pacemaker is adequate. Sensor blending and sensor cross-checking are of clinical importance.     

Intrinsic Conduction Maximizes Cardiopulmonary Performance in Patients with Dual Chamber Pacemakers

Dual chamber pacemaker programmability allows the possibility of atriallytracked ventricular pacing in patients who would otherwise have intrinsic atrioventricular (AV) conduction. Thirteen patients with permanent AV sequential pacemakers (ages 50–79) were evaluated with paired exercise tests to determine the Cardiopulmonary effects of pacemaker induced right ventricular activation compared with normal AV and intraventricular conduction. Peak oxygen uptake (VO₂), oxygen pulse (O₂P), respiratory rate (RR), and respiratory exchange ratio (RER) were determined using breath by-breath analysis of expired gases. Patients exercised to fatigue and exercise tests were performed in random sequence. For patients with intrinsic AV conduction (group I, n = 8) the AV delay was programmed to preserve intrinsic conduction during one study; the alternate test used AV delay programming to produce ventricular pacing. Five patients with chronic AV block (group II) acted as a control for the effects of a rate adaptive AV delay compared to a fixed AV delay. Paired t-testing showed a significantly lower peak VO₂ (P < 0.015) and O₂P (P < 0.01) in patients with atrially-tracked ventricular pacing compared to intrinsic conduction. In contrast, group II showed a significant improvement in peak VO₂ with rate adaptive AV delay compared to fixed AV delay programming (P < 0.05). In conclusion, intrinsic conduction should be preserved in patients with dual chamber pacemakers whenever possible.     

Dual Sensor Pacemakers in Children: What is the Choice of Sensor Blending?

Dual sensor pacemakers were developed to obtain more appropriate responses to activity. We evaluated ten children with dual sensor pacemakers in different sensor blending circumstances using exercise testing to assess which ratio was optimal. Ten patients with several bradydysrhythmias (ages 6-16 years; mean 10.1 years) were included in the study. Eight patients had WIR pacemakers (Vitatron Topaz), models and two patients had VDD pacemakers implanted via the transvenous route. All patients were in a paced rhythm (98.5% pacing). Accurate T wave sensing ranged from 81%-100%; mean 92%, median 95%. Voluntary exercise testing with a CAEP protocol was performed using a treadmill with the pacemaker in WIR mode. Medium activity threshold with three sensor blending ratios (QT = ACT, QT > ACT, and QT < ACT) were done in all patients. The mean duration of exercise was not statistically different among the three sensor blending ratios. After 90 seconds of exercise, the mean pacing rate had increased by 12%, 3%, and 5%, respectively, in the three groups. At maximal exercise, the increases were 45%, 42%, and 54%. Mean HRs during exercise in each of the three ratios were not significantly different, although we found a statistically significant increase in HR during the first two stages of rest period in the QT = ACT sensor blending ratio compared to the QT > ACT ratio. No difference was observed after the second stage. In conclusion: (1) there is no difference between the QT = ACT, QT < ACT, and QT > ACT sensor blending ratios; and (2) each child has to be evaluated by exercise testing to program a correct sensor blending ratio. (PACE 1997; 20[Pt. I]:1301-1304)     

Initial Experience with a New Single Chamber, Dual Sensor Rate Responsive Pacemaker

In August 1991, a new single chamber pacemaker became available that utilizes information from two sensors, activity and stimulus-to-T wave (QT) interval. We are reporting on the first 90 implants in 21 centers. T wave sensing was adequate at implantation in 88/90 patients, with a safety margin of > 100% in 86/90, Activity sensing was adequate in all patients. The contribution of each sensor fsensor blending) is programmable for each patient. Of 75 patients assessed at 1 month after implant, three have been programmed to "Activity-Only" mode, and 72 to dual sensor mode. Of these, 18 have been programmed to "QT < Activity," 48 to "QT = Activity," and 6 to "QT > Activity." Forty-five patients underwent exercise testing in dual sensor mode and a subgroup of 15 also underwent exercise testing in Activity-Only mode. The dual sensor mode produced a more gradual increase in pacing rate. Sensor Cross Checking^tmsatisfactorily prevented a sustained high pacing rate in tests of false-positive activity sensing (tapping, vibrating pacemaker, or static pressure). The maximum pacing rate on walking downstairs (94.2 ± 7.2 ppm) was similar to that produced by walking upstairs (91.6 ± 5.9 ppm). We conclude that initial assessment of this dual sensor, single chamber, rate responsive pacemaker confirms that the algorithm for combining data from two sensors functions satisfactorily. Dual sensor rate responsive pacing may offer significant advantages over single sensor devices, and further studies of this novel device are indicated.     

Failure of Rate Responsive Ventricular Pacing to Improve Physiological Performance in the Univentricular Heart

The physiological efficacy of single chamber, rate responsive ventricular pacing (VVIR) is unknown for symptomatic patients following the Fontan procedure for univentricular hearts. A total of six postoperative children, ages 6–21 years (mean 13), with symptomatic bradycardia requiring pacing therapy, underwent comparative treadmill exercise testing in randomized fixed rate (VVI) and VVIR pacing modes. In all instances, implanted activity pulse generators (Medtronic Model 8403) were programmed to identical age-appropriate low paced rates during WI and VVIR modes with the upper rate response at 150 ppm. All studies were performed at least 2 weeks apart. Physiological values of heart rate, blood pressure, work rate (watts), oxygen comsumption (VO₂), carbon dioxide production (VCO₂), and respiratory exchange ratio (RER) were monitored continuously during each test using a 1 minute incremental treadmill protocol. Ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT) was calculated from VO₂, VCO₂, and minute ventilation. The results demonstrated that although there was a significant increase in paced heart rate per minute throughout exercise (P < 0.01) with VVIR pacing, maximum watts, VO₂, and VAT remained unchanged. These findings indicate that in spite of an improved chronotropic response to exercise, children with Univentricular hearts following the Fontan procedure continue to demonstrate altered hemodynamics which negate potential benefits of VVIR pacing.     

Delayed Exercise Rate Response Kinetics Due to Sensor Cross-Checking in a Dual Sensor Rate Adaptive Pacing System: The Importance of Individual Sensor Programming

By cross-checking the relative sensor activation between a nonspecific and specific sensor during extraneous interference, a multisensor rate adaptive pacemaker may he able to limit inappropriate rate responses. The effects of activity (ACT) sensor programming on rate response kinetics of a QT and ACT dual sensor VVIR pacemaker with sensor cross-checking algorithm were studied in four patients with atrial fibrillation and complete heart block. The rate adaptive setting of each sensor was individually optimized, and an equal rate contribution for the QT and ACT sensors (QT = ACT) was used in the dual sensor VVIR mode. Three maximal treadmill exercise tests were performed in random order in three different VVIR modes driven by QT only, QT = ACT, and in the dual sensor mode with the most sensitive (low threshold) ACT setting. In the two dual sensor modes, the time for onset of rate response (delay time) was reduced (both < 15 sec) compared with QT only VVIR mode (233 ± 70 sec). However, the time to 50% of rate response in the low ACT threshold dual sensor mode was delayed compared with to QT = ACT (450 ± 110 [95% confidence interval 234–666] vs 311 ± 103 [109–513]sec, P < 0.05) and was similar to the QT only mode (401 ± 120 [l66–636]sec). The time to reach 90% of rate response was similar in the three modes tested. The resting activity counts registered by the ACT sensor were < 5 and 16 ± 2 counts/mm in the optimally programmed and low threshold ACT settings, respectively. This resulted in sensor cross-checking at rest in the overprogrammed dual sensor VVIR mode, thereby limiting the rate response. Thus, the combined sensor system provides a faster initial response to exercise than the QT only sensor. Programming the ACT threshold to low will prevent this faster response because of sensor cross-checking.     

Rate-Adaptive Cardiac Pacing in Children Using a Minute Ventilation Biosensor

YABEK, S.M., ET AL.: Rate-Adaptive Cardiac Pacing in Children Using a Minute Ventilation Biosensor. Chronotropic integrity is required for a normal cardiac output response to exercise. We evaluated a rate-adaptive ventricular demand pacemaker (Telectronics, META-MV) which uses minute ventilation as the sensed physiological variable for adjusting pacing rate, in seven young patients with a mean age of 11.4 years. All patients had clinically significant bradycardia related to complete heart block (n = 4) or sinus node dysfunction (n = 3). For the entire group, paced heart rates increased from 70 ± 10 beats/min to 151 ± 19 beats/min with exercise testing. The onset of rate adaptation took < 30 seconds. Changes in paced rate were linearly related to workload, VO₂ (5.9 to 20.7 mL/min/kg) and minute ventilation (8–65 L/min). The decline in pacing rate after exercise was related directly to the gradual decrease in minute ventilation and VO₂. Our data show that minute ventilation closely and accurately reflects the metabolic demands of varying workloads in children and can be used to achieve physiological, rate-adaptive pacing.     

Cardiac Output Is a Sensitive Indicator of Difference in Exercise Performance Between Single and Dual Sensor Pacemakers

Although multisensor pacing may compensate the inadequacy of rate adaptation in a single sensor system, the clinical role of multisensor driven rate adaptive pacing remains unclear. We compared the performance between single sensor and dual sensor driven pacemakers using exercise cardiac output (CO) as a marker of cardiac performance. Eight patients with a mean age of 63 ± 3 years implanted with a dual sensor pacemaker driven by combined activity (ACT) and QT interval sensors were studied in the ACT-, QT- only and the dual QT+ACT-VVIR modes. Patients performed submaximal and maximal exercise tests with CO assessed by carbon dioxide rebreathing method. Comparing the HR response based on the change in metabolic workload, the ACT- VVIR “overpaced,” the QT'VVIR “underpaced,” and the QT+ACT-VVlR achieved the best approximation to normal. The percentages of CO increase in ACT-WIR and QT+ACT-VVIR modes over resting CO were higher at 1 minute of exercise (295 ± 85% and 165 ± 49%, respectively) compared to the QT-VVIR mode (81 ± 40%, P ≤ 0.05). During exercise, stroke volume cbanges from baseline were similar between ACT-VVIR and QT + ACT-VVIR modes, but a compensatory increase in stroke volume occurred in the QT-VVIR mode during submaximal exercise (50 ± 11 mL vs 24 ± 17 mL in the QT+ACT-VVlR and 14 ± 4 in ACT-VVIR, P ≤ 0.003). There was no difference in the maximal exercise workload, exercise duration and CO at the submaximal and maximal exercise between the 3 sensor modes. Thus, exercise capacity is a poor indicator of sensor performance while CO measurement is a sensitive indicator of sensor mode differences especially at low workload exercise. The ACT- VVIR gave the fastest increase in CO at start of exercise at the expanse of overpacing, whereas the “under-paced” QT-VVIR compensated for the slower rate increase by utilizing contractility reserve during submaximal exercise. Dual sensor pacing, by achieving the best heart rate to workload relationship, provided a CO response without overpacing or using contractility reserve during exercise.     

Rate Control with an External SO2 Closed Loop System

In 20 volunteers (mean age 35.5 y) and 12 pacemaker patients (mean age 68.7 y), central venous oxygen saturation (SO₂) was monitored continuously by means of an optical sensor integrated in an external transvenous pacing lead placed in the right ventricular cavity. From the SO₂ signal recorded at rest and during various modalities of exercise, an algorithm for controlling pacing rate of an external pacing system was developed. An open loop system was used in the volunteers, allowing the comparison of the computed pacing rate with the individual intrinsic heart rate. There was an excellent correlation between the two frequencies as far as the dynamic characteristics and the steady state relationship were concerned. In five pacemaker patients who were stimulated via the external lead, a closed loop control of pacing rate was used. In one patient with a DDD pacemaker implanted for third degree AV-block, the rate response of the SO₂ driven pacemaker was well in accordance with the rate attained with the implanted atrial triggered system. With both pacing modes, exercise capacity as determined on a symptom limited treodmill test was identical. In four patients (3 AV block III, 1 bradyarrhythmia) an improvement in exercise tolerance up to 65 percent could be demonstrated with the rate responsive pacing mode. In all patients, it could he shown that an autoregulating pacemaker system with SO₂ is an open possibility.     

The Effect of DDD Pacing on Ergospirometric Parameters and Neurohormonal Activity in Patients with Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy

This study examined the acute and long-term effects of DDD pacing on ergospirometric parameters and neurohormonal activity in patients with hypertrophic obstructive Cardiomyopathy (HOCM). We studied eight patients (five males), aged 56 ± 7 years, with HOCM refractory to drugs. In all patients a DDD pacemaker was implanted and programmed with an atrioventricular (AV) delay that insured full ventricular activation. The patients underwent echocardiographic examination and exercise stress testing before and 3 days, 3 months, and 12 months after pacemaker implantation. Oxygen consumption was measured at the anaerobic threshold (VO_2AT) and peak exercise (pVO₂). Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (c-AMP) levels were measured concomitantly. Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) pressure gradient decreased significantly from 70 ± 18 to 25 ± 12 mmHg (P < 0.05) 3 days after pacing and remained unchanged at 3 and 12 months. pVO₂ and VO_2AT increased significantly, from 20.1 ± 3 to 23.4 ± 3 mL/kg/min and from 16 ± 3 to 17.8 ± 2 mL/kg/min, respectively (P < 0.05). This improvement continued up to 3 months, and then remained stable until the end of the 12-month follow-up period. ANP levels decreased at 3 days from 85.4 ± 5.7 to 75.4 ± 7.3 fmol/mL (P < 0.05), and remained unchanged over the 12 months. c-AMP levels did not change significantly after the onset of pacing. DDD pacing in patients with HOCM not only reduces the LVOT pressure gradient but also causes a significant early and long-term improvement in exercise capacity and neurohormonal profile.     

The Effects of Rate-Adaptive Atrial Pacing Versus Ventricular Backup Pacing on Exercise Capacity in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Background: Atrial rate-adaptive pacing may improve cardiopulmonary reserve in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
Methods: A randomized, blinded, single-crossover design enrolled dual-chamber implantable defibrillator recipients without pacing indications and an ejection fraction ≤40% to undergo cardiopulmonary exercise treadmill stress testing in both atrial rate-adaptive pacing (AAIR) and ventricular demand pacing (VVI) pacing modes. The primary endpoint was change in peak oxygen consumption (VO₂). Secondary endpoints were changes in anaerobic threshold, perceived exertion, exercise duration, and peak blood pressure.
Results: Ten patients, nine males, eight with New York Heart Association class I, mean ejection fraction 24 ± 7%, were analyzed. Baseline VO₂ was 3.6 ± 0.5 mL/kg/min. Heart rate at peak exercise was significantly higher during AAIR versus VVI pacing (142 ± 18 vs 130 ± 23 bpm; P = 0.05). However, there was no difference in peak VO₂ (AAIR 23.7 ± 6.1 vs VVI 23.8 ± 6.3 mL/kg/min; P = 0.8), anaerobic threshold (AAIR 1.3 ± 0.3 vs VVI 1.2 ± 0.2 L/min; P = 0.11), rate of perceived exertion (AAIR 7.3 ± 1.5 vs VVI 7.8 ± 1.2; P = 0.46), exercise duration (AAIR 15 minutes, 46 seconds ± 2 minutes, 54 seconds vs VVI 16 minutes, 3 seconds ± 2 minutes, 48 seconds; P = 0.38), or peak systolic blood pressure (AAIR 155 ± 22 vs VVI 153 ± 21; P = 0.61) between the two pacing modes.
Conclusion: In this study, AAIR pacing did not improve peak VO_2, anaerobic threshold, rate of perceived exertion, or exercise duration compared to VVI backup pacing in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and no pacing indications.     

Clinical Comparison of Acute Single to Dual Chamber Pacing in Chronotropically Incompetent Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Dual chamber, rate responsive (DDDR) pacing is felt to be superior to ventricular, rate responsive (VVIR) pacing since it more closely mimics the normal electrical and hemodynamic activity of the heart. This reasoning has been used to justify the higher initial costs and increased complexity of dual chamber systems. This study was designed to determine if objective criteria could be identified during acute testing to justify implanting a dual chamber instead of a single chamber system in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Eight patients with DDDR pacemakers (implanted for chronotropic incompetence) and left ventricular dysfunction underwent exercise radionuclide angiography and graded exercise treadmill testing. Each patient performed the tests in the single (VVIR) and dual (DDDR) chamber modes in a randomized, blinded fashion. We found that objective parameters such as ejection fraction (31%± 13% vs 31%± 10%), exercise tolerance (6.1 ± 2.7 min vs 6.3 ± 2.9 min), oxygen consumption (VO₂) (941 ± 286 mL/min vs 994 ± 314 mL/min), carbon dioxide production (VCO₂) (995 ± 332 mL/min vs 1054 ± 356 mL/min), and maximum attainable workload (43 ± 24 W vs 46 ± 22 W) did not differ between the single and dual chamber pacing modes. These findings suggest that in the acute setting, the additional cost and complexity of dual chamber, rate responsive pacing cannot be justified by objective improvements in exercise tolerance in patients with underlying left ventricular dysfunction.     

The Value of DDD Pacing in Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

Although the beneficial effects of DDD pacing are well known, currently available ICDs provide only fixed rate ventricular antibradycardia pacing. In a consecutive series of 139 patients with ICDs, we have analyzed the need for antibradycardia pacing and the indications for DDD pacing. We also report our initial experience with the Defender 9001 (ELA Medical, France) DDD-ICD. Out of 139 patients, 25 (18%) were in need of antibradycardia pacing. Ten patients already had a pacemaker at the time of ICD implantation and ten other patients had a conventional pacemaker indication at that time. Five patients became pacemaker dependent during a follow-up of 20 ± 8 months. The disorders necessitating pacemaker therapy were high degree AV conduction disturbances in 72%, sick sinus syndrome in 12%, and AF with a slow ventricular response in 16% of patients. Based upon current indications, DDD pacing was indicated in 20 (80%) of 25 patients. The Defender 9001 DDD-ICD (ELA Medical) was used in two patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and pacemaker syndrome with VVI pacing. Cardiac output during DDD pacing increased by 36% in one patient with an increase in VO₂ max during exercise of 29%. The other patient showed an increase in cardiac output of 50% with DDD pacing, and, while unable to exercise with VVI pacing, had a VO_2max of 24 mL/kg per minute during DDD pacing. Up to 18% of our ICD patients are in need of antibradycardia pacing. Of these pacemaker dependent patients, 80% have an indication for DDD pacing. Our first clinical experience with a DDD-ICD confirms the hemodynamic benefit of AV synchronous pacing in ICD patients with pacemaker syndrome.     

Clinical Evaluation of a Dual Sensor, Rate Responsive Pacemaker

Dual sensor pacemakers should respond more appropriately during differing exercise modes than a single sensor device. The Topaz™ models 515 (QT and activity count [ACT] sensing) pacemaker shows appropriate rate response during treadmill exercise testing. We postulated that adjustments to relative sensor contribution should allow fine tuning of the onset of rate response. Eleven patients with this pacemaker were studied. Three standard exercise tests were performed with adjustment of sensor blending and activity threshold between each one. We also assessed the response to isometric exercise and a false positive activity signal. Results : Times to 100 ppm (3.7 ± 1.3, 4.4 ± 2.0, 5.3 ±1.5 mins), times to peak rate (6.1 ± 1.6, 5.6 ± 1.4, 6.5 ± 1.3 mins) and accelerations to peak (9.0 ± 2.4, 9.2 ± 5.3, 7.7 ± 2.8 ppm/min) were measured in all three different sensor settings (QT = ACT, QT 相似文献   

Cardiopulmonary Responses to Exercise in Children with Activity Sensing Rate Responsive Ventricular Pacemakers

The physiological benefits of activity sensing rate responsive ventricular pacing)VVIR) over fixed rate pacing)VVI) were investigated in 14 children during incremenlal cycle exercise. Based on their heart rhythm response during exercise, children were divided into two groups. Group I patients)13 ± 4 years) remained in a paced-only rhythm when exercised. Group II patients)16 ± 7 years) were paced at rest but converted to sinus rhythm with exercise. In Group I patients, the significant physioJogicol benefits of VVIR over VVI pacing were evidenced hy a 51% increase in peak heart rate)HRmax) and a 16% increase in exercise duration and maximum oxygen uptake)VO₂max). Additionally, a 27% reduction in peak oxygen pulse)O₂Pmax) was found, reflecting a similar decrease in stroke volume. The cardiorespiraiory responses of Group I and 11 patients were compared in terms of percent of predicted normal values. Although Group I patients in the VVIR mode attained a better exercise performance than in the VVI mode and a normal O₂Pmax)108% pred). their HRmax)62% pred) and VO₂max)70% pred) fell far below normal values. In comparison. Group II patients, who went into sinus rhythm, achieved normal values for HRmax)84% pred), VO₂max)90% pred), and O₂Pmax)97% pred). The higher pacing rates attained by Group I patients in the VVIR mode may have allowed them to reach not only a higher cardiac output but also a more normal stroke volume at peak exercise than in the VVI mode. However, the overall exercise performance of children paced in the VVI and VVIR modes were significantly diminished compared to the performance of children who went into sinus rhythm with exercise.)     

Quantitative Comparison of Rate Response and Oxygen Uptake Kinetics Between Different Sensor Modes in Multisensor Rate Adaptive Pacing

Although multisensor pacing may mitigate the inadequacy of rate adaptation in a single sensor system, the clinical role of multisensor driven rate adaptive pacing remains unclear. The cardiopulmonary performance of six patients (mean age 63.5 ± 10 years) who had undergone the implant of combined QT and activity VVIR (Topaz®) pacemakers was assessed during submaximal and maximal treadmill exercise with the rate response sensor randomly programmed to either single sensor mode. QT and activity (ACT), or dual sensor mode, with equal contribution of QT and ACT (QT = ACT). The rate of response, the proportionality, oxygen kinetics, and maximal exercise performance of the various sensor modes during exercise were measured and compared. The ACT sensor mode “overpaced” and the QT and QT = ACT sensor modes “underpaced” during the first three quartiles of exercise (P < 0.05). The ACT sensor mode also gave the fastest rate of response with the shortest delay (13 ± 1.5 sec vs 145 ± 58 sec and 41 ± 17 sec, P < 0.05), time to 50% rate response (39 ±2.7 sec vs 275 ± 48 sec and 203 ± 40 sec, P < 0.05), and time to 90% of rate response (107 ± 21 sec vs 375 ± 34 sec and 347 ± 34 sec, P < 0.05) and a smaller oxygen debt (0.87 ± 0.16 L vs 1.10 ± 0.2 L and 1.07 ± 0.18 L, P < 0.05) compared to the QTand QT = ACT sensor modes, respectively. These differences were most significant at low exercise workloads. Thus, different sensor combinations resuh in different rate response profiles and oxygen delivery, especially during low level exercise. However, the observed oxygen kinetics difference was workload dependent, and its clinical relevance remains to be tested. Despite the marked difference in exercise rate profile and oxygen kinetics, there was no difference in the maximal oxygen uptake, anaerobic threshold, and exercise duration between the various sensor modes during maximal exercise.     

Changes in blood pressure and cardiac output during maximal isokinetic exercise.

This study was undertaken to determine the blood pressure (BP) and cardiac output (Qc) responses to maximal isokinetic exercise. The subjects (n = 5) performed unilateral knee extension/flexion exercise (knee exercise) and unilateral elbow extension/flexion exercise (elbow exercise) at 0.52, 1.57, and 2.62 rads.sec-1. The BP was monitored using a cannula placed in the radial artery. Heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), and Qc were measured by impedance cardiography. In response to isokinetic exercise, HR and Qc increased significantly (p less than .01), while the SV did not. The BP response was characterized by significant increases in systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) (p less than .01). The Qc and MAP, responses were not influenced by the exercise velocity. The adjustments in HR, MAP, and rate pressure product (RPP) to the elbow exercise were qualitatively similar to those seen during the knee exercise, but the absolute values achieved were smaller (p less than .05). Compared with maximal dynamic exercise, the HR and SV responses to the knee exercises were lower. The MAP response to isokinetic exercise equaled the highest value achieved during dynamic exercise. Findings from the present study suggest that the cardiovascular stress (the increase in HR, MAP, and RPP) associated with isokinetic exercise is independent of the velocity of movement and is proportional to the active muscle mass.