共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
Schwetz BA 《International journal of toxicology》2001,20(1):3-8
Dr. Schwetz is the Acting Deputy Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). He was Director of FDA National Center for Toxicological Research in Jefferson, AR, from 1993 to 1999. A diplomate of the American Board of Toxicology, Dr. Schwetz was acting Director of the Environmental Toxicology Program at the National Institutes of Health National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) in Research Triangle Park, NC, before coming to the FDA in 1993. He was also Associate Director of the National Toxicology program there. He had been Chief of the Institute Systems Toxicity Branch since 1982. Dr. Schwetz currently serves as Adjunct Professor, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology/Division of Interdisciplinary Toxicology, at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. He was editor of Fundamental and Applied Toxicology from 1986 to 1992, and serves on the Editorial Advisory Board of Environmental Health Perspectives and Critical Reviews in Toxicology. Dr. Schwetz is an invited member of the Canada Health Protection Branch Science Advisory Board, and an elected member of the National Academy of Sciences Institute of Medicine. He is a member of the Society of Toxicology (SOT) and the National Capitol Area Chapter, SOT; the American Veterinary Medical Association; National Society of Phi Zeta, Honor Society of Veterinary Medicine; Teratology Society; Behavioral Teratology Society; and the Reproductive Toxicology Specialty Section of the SOT. He is past president of the Reproductive Toxicology Specialty Section of the SOT and of the North Carolina and the South Central Chapters of the SOT. In addition to numerous other professional awards during his career, Dr. Schwetz received the U.S. Government 1998 Meritorious Executive Presidential Rank Award. 相似文献
5.
New biomarkers of safety and efficacy are becoming powerful tools in drug development. Their application can be accelerated if a consensus can be reached about their qualification for regulatory applications. This consensus requires a review structure within the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that can evaluate qualification data for these biomarkers and determine whether these biomarkers can be qualified. A pilot process and corresponding Biomarker Qualification Review Team have been developed to test how the FDA can work on biomarker qualification. 相似文献
6.
Challenged with the clearly demonstrated need for highly trained clinical pharmacologists for new drug development and review activities, the FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) established an internal Staff College. This organizationally unique and innovative unit addressed the educational needs of both the new and the veteran CDER scientists. A multileveled strategy was conceptualized and implemented as described. 相似文献
7.
史菁菁 《临床药物治疗杂志》2019,17(1)
<正>2018年美国食品药品监督管理局(Food and Drug Administration, FDA)共批准了43个新分子实体(new molecular entity,NMEs)和23个新生物制剂(biologic license applications,BLAs),该数字较2017年的56个,增加了10个(17. 9%)。按照药物作用分类,抗肿瘤药物18个(27. 3%),心血管系统药物12个(18. 2%),呼吸系统药物2个(3.0%),神经系统用药8个(12. 1%),内分泌用药9个(13.6%),抗感染药9个(13.6%),其他药物7个(10. 6%)。 相似文献
8.
食品安全监管是一项复杂的系统工程,涉及到多个职能部门,国务院赋予食品药品监管部门的职能是:综合监督,组织协调,依法组织开展对重大事故的查处。如何正确理解、准确履行好这一职能,努力把加强党的执政能力建设的总体要求落实到全面提高食品药品监管系统的科学行政、民主行政、依法行政水平上来,建立统一、高效、权威的食品安全监管机制,是摆在每一位食品药品监管工作者面前的重要课题。笔者就此谈谈自己的肤浅看法,旨在抛砖引玉。 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
加强食品安全法制建设是当前世界各国都关注的问题之一,也是解决食品安全问题的重要保障.本文对美国的食品安全法律进行了研究,分析评价了它的内容和优势,对我国食品安全法制建设有借鉴意义. 相似文献
12.
13.
14.
15.
《Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs》2013,30(5-6):381-409
AbstractCommercial requirements and the use of indigenous science for advertising purposes indicate that at least some studies will always be done in each country where medications are marketed. However, drug development is a transnational phenomenon where data from one country will be used to obtain marketing approval in another. Yet local regulatory and scientific requirements preclude the use of one set of data for all countries, which increases the cost of an already expensive process. In the US the FDA has historically expressed concerns about accepting foreign data as the sole basis for approval of an NDA. Despite the timolol case, foreign data are still used infrequently and only on an ad hoc basis. Data quality, verification, authentication, and inspection continue to be the most important problems in this area. Standardized protocols, and strict adherence to them; the use of investigators with a proven track record, ability, and appropriate training; frequent monitoring by United States drug sponsors; appropriate statistical analyses; a rigorous internal critique of the study; the use of anthropologists to deal with perceived and cryptic cross-cultural problems; and avoidance of “found” data will ameliorate problems with non-US data. 相似文献
16.
17.
18.
19.
Danielle M. Molnar Mary E. Kremzner 《Journal of the American Pharmacists Association》2019,59(1):13-16