Superiority of alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy in extensive small cell lung cancer. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial by the National Cancer Institute of Canada

The National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group conducted a prospective randomized study comparing standard chemotherapy with alternating chemotherapy in patients with extensive small cell lung cancer. "Standard" treatment consisted of cyclophosphamide (1000 mg/m2 body surface area); doxorubicin (50 mg/m2), and vincristine (2 mg) every 3 weeks for six courses. Alternating chemotherapy was cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine alternating with etoposide (100 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3) every 3 weeks for six treatment cycles. Two hundred eighty-nine patients were eligible and evaluable for response to therapy and survival. Best response was higher in patients on alternating chemotherapy (complete plus partial response, 80% compared with 63.2%; p less than 0.002). Progression-free survival for patients on alternating chemotherapy was superior (p less than 0.0001) as was overall survival (p = 0.03). Major toxicities were equally frequent in both treatment groups. These results show a modest superiority of alternating chemotherapy over standard therapy in extensive small cell lung cancer.     

Single-agent and combination chemotherapy for extensive non-small cell carcinomas of the lung

One hundred and twenty-four patients with extensive bronchogenic carcinoma were randomized to one of three chemotherapeutic regimens. Forty-one patients received cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) (group 1); 47 patients received cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) and CCNU (70 mg/m2 every 6 weeks) (group 2); and 36 patients received cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks), CCNU (70 mg/m2 every 6 weeks), and doxorubicin (40 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) (group 3). The objective response rates were 5%, 8%, and 6% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P greater than or equal to 0.3). Median survival times were 20.5 months (group 1), 17.8 months (group 2), and 18.8 months (group 3). There was no significant difference in median survival between groups (P greater than or equal to 0.4). Responders in each group survived longer than nonresponders. Hematologic toxic effects were severe in group 3 and moderate in group 2. Since combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and CCNU is not superior to cyclophosphamide as a single agent and is associated with greater toxicity, these combinations are not recommended as therapy for extensive bronchogenic carcinoma.     

High-dose mitoxantrone and cyclophosphamide without stem cell support in high-risk and advanced solid tumors: a phase I trial

This phase I study was designed to develop a high-dose combination of two cycles of mitoxantrone and cyclophosphamide in patients with solid tumors, as an alternative to single-cycle high-dose regimens that use only alkylating agents. Treatment was delivered with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), but without stem cell support, in order to avoid potential tumor cell reinfusion. Thirty-one patients with advanced solid tumors received two cycles of high-dose mitoxantrone (20-30 mg/m2) plus high-dose cyclophosphamide (3000-4000 mg/m2). All patients received G-CSF until hematologic recovery. Dose-escalation was performed when less than 50% of cycles per level had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) achieved was mitoxantrone 25 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 4000 mg/m2. Main dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were hematological: grade IV neutropenia lasting more than 7 days and thrombopenia below 20 x 10(9)/l requiring more than one platelet transfusion. Non-hematological DLT consisted predominantly of grade III emesis and asthenia. Follow-up after each cycle was performed in an outpatient setting and there were no toxic deaths. In conclusion, the administration of two cycles of high-dose mitoxantrone and cyclophosphamide with G-CSF support is safe and feasible. MTD was mitoxantrone 25 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 4000 mg/m2. Evaluation of this regimen is being done in a phase II trial.     

Non-haematological toxicity limiting the application of sequential high dose chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer.

A programme of repeated high dose chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer was developed using (1) cyclophosphamide 4 g/m2 followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection; (2) three cycles of conventional dose chemotherapy; (3) high dose cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and carmustine with PBSC rescue; and (4) high dose etoposide and melphalan with PBSC rescue. Fifteen eligible patients had advanced poor prognosis breast cancer either at initial diagnosis (one patient) or at relapse (14 patients). During the course of the protocol, there were three treatment related deaths, two patient withdrawals due to debilitating toxicity, five patient withdrawals due to disease progression, and one patient withdrawal due to inadequate collection of PBSC. The remaining four patients did not complete the planned protocol as the programme was terminated because of the unacceptable morbidity and mortality. They were treated with an alternative high dose chemotherapy protocol which was well tolerated. This study highlights the significant problems associated with a complex sequential high dose chemotherapy regimen. Cyclophosphamide mobilized PBSC infused following high dose chemotherapy enables rapid haematological recovery. However the non-haematological toxicity following high dose chemotherapy regimens is often severe and may limit the application of certain sequential high dose chemotherapy combinations in patients with breast cancer.     

A phase I dose escalation study of multicyclic, dose-intensive chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell support for small cell lung cancer

A phase I dose-escalation study of multicyclic, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE) with sequential reinfusion of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) was conducted to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of ICE. Twenty-four patients with SCLC (LD: 6, ED: 18) were treated with ifosfamide (3000-9000 mg/m2, 24-h infusion), carboplatin (300-400 mg/m2), and etoposide (300 mg/m2) followed by subcutaneous filgrastim (75 microg/day) from day 4 to the day of PBSC collection. PBSC were harvested when the WBC count reached >/=5 x 109/l. The leukapheresis product was cryopreserved and reinfused on day 4 of the next cycle, which was started 48 h after the last PBSC collection. The ifosfamide dose was escalated as follows: 3000 mg/m2 (level 1), 5000 mg/m2 (level 2), 7000 mg/m2 (level 3), 9000 mg/m2 (level 4). Patients with LD were treated with concurrent radiotherapy at 1.5 Gy twice daily for the initial 3 weeks to a total dose of 45 Gy and MTD, defined separately. Patients were evaluated for hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity, actual dose intensities, as well as response to therapy. The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as the dose level at which more than 5 days of grade 4 myelo- suppression or non-hematologic toxicity greater than grade 3 developed in two thirds of the patients. For ED cases, MTD was level 4 and the recommended dose of ifosfamide was 7000 mg/m2. For LD cases, the recommended dose of ifosfamide was 5000 mg/m2. The dose limiting toxicity of multicyclic ICE was hemato- logic toxicity and CNS toxicity which manifested as ataxia. Tumor responses were seen in all patients, with 14 patients showing a complete response. The actual total dose-intensity at the recommended dose level was 2.2 and 1.74, for ED and LD, respectively, compared with previously reported ICE regimens. PBSC support for dose-intensive ICE regimen permitted dose escalation of ifosfamide with a mean interval of 16-17 days. We conclude that this regimen is well tolerated, with acceptable hematological and non-hematological toxicity. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 25, 5-11.     

A comparison of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (Vel-CD) chemotherapy without and with thalidomide (Vel-CTD) for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

We compared the clinical responses and toxicities between bortezomib-based salvage chemotherapy combined with cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone(Vel-CTD) and without thalidomide (Vel-CD) in patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Eighty-six patients received at least two cycles of treatment with Vel-CTD (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 4, 8, and 11; cyclophosphamide 150 mg/m2 orally on days 1–4; thalidomide 50–100 mg/day orally every day; and dexamethasone 20 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 every 3 weeks), and 67 patients were given at least two cycles of Vel-CD, which is the same regimen as Vel-CTD except without thalidomide. The overall response rates of the Vel-CD and Vel-CTD groups were 88% and 90% (p>0.05), respectively. There was no difference in the progression free survival (p = 0.69) and overall survival rates(p = 0.49) between the two groups. Grade 3 or more adverse hematologic events occurred in the same proportion of patients in both groups. In terms of non-hematologic toxicities, the Vel-CTD group showed a higher proportion of autonomic neuropathy, motor neuropathy, and sensory neuropathy compared to the Vel-CD group (each, p<0.05). Only three patients in the Vel-CTD group showed thrombotic events despite aspirin prophylaxis. The Vel-CD regimen inpatients with relapsed or refractory MM is an effective and more tolerable salvage therapy compared to Vel-CTD in terms of its comparable response rate and less severe of non-hematologic toxicities.     

Achieving Full-Dose, On-Schedule Administration of ACE Chemotherapy Every 14 Days for the Treatment of Patients with Extensive Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Extensive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is commonly treated with multiple cycles of chemotherapy. Reducing the time interval between cycles of chemotherapy (dose-dense chemotherapy) may improve outcomes in the treatment of extensive SCLC, as it has in other chemosensitive malignancies. To evaluate the feasibility of dose-dense chemotherapy in patients with extensive SCLC, this study evaluates a dose-dense doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide/etoposide (ACE) regimen, supported by the once-per-cycle administration of the hematopoietic growth factor pegfilgrastim. Patients received up to six 14-day cycles of ACE chemotherapy (doxorubicin 40 mg/m,² cyclophosphamide 1000 mg/m², etoposide 120 mg/m² on day 1 IV, plus oral etoposide 240 mg/m² daily on days 2–3). On day 4 of each cycle, patients received pegfilgrastim 6 mg by subcutaneous injection. Of 30 patients enrolled, 27 started chemotherapy and received pegfilgrastim. Full-dose, on-schedule chemotherapy was given to all 22 patients starting cycle 2, and in 107 (88%) of 121 cycles. Eighteen of the 27 patients (67%) received full-dose, on-schedule chemotherapy for all 6 cycles. The overall response rate was 17/27 (63%). Nine patients (33%) experienced hematologic toxicities that investigators considered severe or life-threatening. Four patients (15%) had febrile neutropenia. Full-dose, on-schedule dose-dense ACE chemotherapy is feasible with once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim support in extensive SCLC.     

First-line thalidomide-dexamethasone therapy in preparation for autologous stem cell transplantation in young patients (<61 years) with symptomatic multiple myeloma

Thalidomide-dexamethasone therapy was given in patients (<61 years) with previously untreated symptomatic multiple myeloma. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of this combination as first-line therapy, and to determine its effect on stem cell collection and engraftment. During first-line therapy, thalidomide and dexamethasone were administered for 75 days (200 mg/day) and 3 months, respectively. The monthly dose of dexamethasone was 20 mg/m2/day for 4 days, with cycles repeated on days 9 to 12 and 17 to 20 on the first and the third month of therapy. After first-line therapy, a collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) was performed. Between May 2003 and September 2004, 60 patients were included. On an intent-to-treat basis, the overall response (> or =partial response) rate was 74%, including 24% of patients who obtained a complete remission. Grade 3-4 toxicities consisted of infections (12%), deep-vein thrombosis (3%), constipation (5%), and neuropathy (5%). A total of 58 patients (96%) proceeded to PBSC mobilisation and yielded a median number of 8 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. First-line thalidomide-dexamethasone therapy is effective and relatively well tolerated in young patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma. This combination does not affect PBSC mobilisation.     

Modified ProMACE-MOPP hybrid regimen with moderate-dose methotrexate for patients with primary CNS lymphoma

The object of this study was to assess the estimation of 2- and 5-year overall survival and tumor response and the frequency and severity of treatment morbidity with a modified ProMACE-MOPP hybrid protocol in patients with primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL). Thirty-two immunocompetent patients were treated with a regimen of pirarubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, vincristine, and methotrexate (500 mg/m(2)) administered in 21-day cycles. Intraventricular 10 mg of methotrexate was given for eight cycles once a week. Patients received 20 Gy of whole brain radiotherapy after three cycles of chemotherapy. A single cycle of chemotherapy was repeated every 4 months for 2 years. Older patients (aged >60) received a reduced dose of chemotherapeutic agents. Eighteen patients were followed up with neuroimaging and neuropsychological assessments for evidence of CNS toxicity. Sixteen patients completed the regimen as planned. The response rate was 87.5% after the initial chemoradiotherapy. The cumulative survival and progression-free survival rates at 5 years were 56 and 31%, respectively. The median survival time was 68 months. The median progression-free survival time was 39 months. Toxicity included grade 3 or 4 leukopenia in 33% of the cycles administered. There were eight grade 3 or 4 pulmonary toxicities. There were three deaths during chemotherapy: one as a result of sepsis and two of pneumonitis. Three patients (25%) experienced delayed neurologic toxicity while on the complete regimen. Maintaining the dose of methotrexate while adding chemotherapeutic agents improved disease control and overall survival in patients with PCNSL, but early toxicity and delayed neurotoxicity are still a risk of this approach.     

High-dose methotrexate with R-CHOP therapy for the treatment of patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma

We describe MR-CHOP therapy, a novel treatment regimen consisting of high-dose methotrexate and R-CHOP that provides systemic anti-tumor activity with penetration of the blood-brain barrier in patients with newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma. The MR-CHOP regimen was administered with 2 g/m(2) of methotrexate and 375 mg/m(2) of rituximab on day 1, 750 mg/m(2) of cyclophosphamide on day 3, 50 mg/m(2) of doxorubicin on day 3, 1.4 mg/m(2) of vincristine on day 3 and 100 mg of prednisolone on days 1-5 in this pilot study of seven patients. Six cycles of MR-CHOP therapy were administered every 3 weeks, followed by high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue in young patients, or an additional two cycles of 4 g/m(2) methotrexate and rituximab in older patients. The overall response rate was 100%, with 85.7% complete remission (CR). One patient showed partial response, relapsed and subsequently died. Another relapsed following CR, and was rescued by further salvage therapy. The others survive without relapse at a median observation period of 24 months. Hematological toxicity included grade 4 leukocytopenia in 4/7 and neutropenia in 5/7, which were transient and tolerated well. Non-hematological toxicities were tolerated well. The efficacy of this novel regimen as remission induction therapy was found to be promising in this pilot study, although the number of patients was small and follow-up short.     

PAD combination therapy (PS-341/bortezomib, doxorubicin and dexamethasone) for previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma

Bortezomib (formerly PS-341) has significant activity in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), its efficacy is increased with the addition of dexamethasone and it demonstrates synergy with doxorubicin, thus providing the rationale for combination therapy with bortezomib, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (PAD). Patients with untreated MM received four 21-d cycles of PAD, comprising bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) on days 1, 4, 8 and 11, along with dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4, 8-11 and 15-18 during cycle 1 and days 1-4 during cycles 2-4. During days 1-4, patients also received 0, 4.5 or 9 mg/m(2) of doxorubicin at dose levels 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Following peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection, patients received high-dose melphalan (MEL200) with PBSC transplantation (PBSCT). After PAD induction alone, 20 of 21 patients (95%) achieved at least a partial response (PR), including complete response (CR) in five patients (24%). Twenty of 21 had PBSC mobilized, and 18 of 20 received MEL200/PBSCT. In an intention-to-treat analysis, response rates were: CR 43%, near CR 14%, very good PR 24%, PR 14% and stable disease 5%. PAD was effective, did not prejudice subsequent PBSC collection, and should be further evaluated in prospective randomized trials.     

国产多西他赛联合顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效观察

目的观察国产多西他赛联合顺铂（DDP）治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的近期疗效、临床受益和毒副反应。方法70例晚期NSCLC患者给予DP方案化疗：国产多西他赛75mg/m^2，静滴，d1；顺铂75mg/m^2，静滴，d1；21d为1周期。每例患者治疗2周期以上。结果全组完全缓解2例，部分缓解29例，稳定36例，进展3例，总有效率44．3％。中位生存期10．1个月，1年生存率38．6％（27／70）。临床受益疗效：行为状态阳性率51．4％，体重阳性率47．1％。毒副反应主要为骨髓抑制，脱发和消化系统反应。其中白细胞减少占75．7％，G-CSF治疗后较快恢复。结论国产多西他赛联合顺铂无论一线还是二线治疗晚期NSCLC近期疗效和临床受益良好，毒副反应可耐受。     

Dose-finding study of imatinib in combination with intravenous cytarabine: feasibility in newly diagnosed patients with chronic myeloid leukemia

The HOVON cooperative study group performed a feasibility study of escalated imatinib and intravenous cytarabine in 165 patients with early chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Patients received 2 cycles of intravenous cytarabine (200 mg/m(2) or 1000 mg/m(2) days 1-7) in conjunction with imatinib (200 mg, 400 mg, 600 mg, or 800 mg), according to predefined, successive dose levels. All dose levels proved feasible. Seven dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed in 302 cycles of chemotherapy, which were caused by streptococcal bacteremia in 5 cases. Intermediate-dose cytarabine (1000 mg/m(2)) prolonged time to neutrophil recovery and platelet recovery compared with a standard dose (200 mg/m(2)). High-dose imatinib (600 mg or 800 mg) extended the time to platelet recovery compared with a standard dose (400 mg). More infectious complications common toxicity criteria (CTC) grade 3 or 4 were observed after intermediate-dose cytarabine compared with a standard-dose of cytarabine. Early response data after combination therapy included a complete cytogenetic response in 48% and a major molecular response in 30% of patients, which increased to 46% major molecular responses at 1 year, including 13% complete molecular responses. We conclude that combination therapy of escalating dosages of imatinib and cytarabine is feasible. This study was registered at www.kankerbestrijding.nl as no. CKTO-2001-03.     

Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells with docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (CY) in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a randomized trial of 3 vs 4 g/m2 of CY

The purpose of this study was to develop a regimen of docetaxel, cyclophosphamide (CY) and filgrastim for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (n = 66). A phase I trial of CY 2, 3 or 4 g/m2 with docetaxel 100 mg/m2, in consecutive cohorts of four patients each, did not reveal any dose-limiting toxicities and subsequent patients were randomized to receive 3 or 4 g/m2 of CY. The median yield of CD34+ cells from all patients was 11.06x10(6)/kg (range, 0.03-84.77) from a median of two aphereses (range, 1-7); 6.52x10(6) CD34+ cells/kg/apheresis (range, 0.01-52.07). Target CD34+ cell doses > or =2.5 and > or =5.0x10(6)/kg were achieved in 89% and 79%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in CD34+ cell yields or target CD34+ cell doses achieved following 3 or 4 g/m2 of CY. Patients with only one prior chemotherapy regimen yielded a median of 12.82x10(6) CD34+ cells/kg/apheresis compared to 5.85 for those receiving > or =2 regimens (P = 0.03). It was concluded that the combination of docetaxel, 100 mg/m2, CY 3 g/m2 without mesna could be administered with acceptable toxicity with collection of adequate quantities of PBSC from the majority of patients.     

The multicenter trial SAKK 37/95 of cladribine, cyclophosphamide and prednisone in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemias and low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas

A multicenter trial was performed to confirm the therapeutic efficacy and the toxicity profile of the combination of cladribine, cyclophosphamide and prednisone in low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Twenty-three adults with previously treated (61%) or untreated (39%) NHL International Working Formulation A or Binet B and C CLL were administered cladribine 0.1 mg/kg/day as a subcutaneous bolus for 5 days, intravenous cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 on day 1, and oral prednisone 40 mg/m2 on days 1-5, every 4 weeks. Unexpected early hematological toxicities led to dose modifications for pretreated patients who received cladribine for 3 days only up to a maximum of five courses. Responses were observed in 75%, with 7 patients obtaining a complete clinical and hematological response. Median duration of complete response was 9 months. Median time to progression or relapse was 31 months. Myelosuppression and infections were dose limiting whereas posttreatment complications, including fatalities, resulted from infections. Median overall survival time from trial entry was 60 months. Activity of the combination of cladribine, cyclophosphamide and prednisone was confirmed. However, in the specific setting of a multicenter trial, unexpected fatal infectious episodes occurred in pretreated patients. Great caution is thus required in these susceptible patients and the routine use of corticosteroids should probably be abandoned.     

A randomized trial of different docetaxel schedules in non-small cell lung cancer patients who failed previous platinum-based chemotherapy

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Docetaxel has shown activity in the second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Phase II studies have suggested that weekly therapy with docetaxel probably has a better toxicity profile than the conventional schedule of once every 3 weeks. Our aim was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of different docetaxel schedules in NSCLC patients who did not respond to previous platinum-based chemotherapy. SETTING: National teaching hospital in Taiwan. METHODS: Treatment consisted of the following: (1) docetaxel, 35 mg/m(2) IV infusion (D(35)) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks; (2) docetaxel, 40 mg/m(2) IV (D(40)) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks; and (3) docetaxel, 75 mg/m(2) IV (D(75)) on day 1 every 3 weeks. Patients were randomized at a ratio of 2:2:1, with the D(75) arm as the control arm. From 2002 to 2004, 161 patients were enrolled into the study. RESULTS: The number of patients enrolled in each arm of the study was as follows: D(35) group, 64 patients; D(40) group, 64 patients; D(75) group, 33 patients. The mean ages of patients were as follows: D(35) group, 65 years of age; D(40) group, 63 years of age; D(75) group, 64 years of age. The median number of cycles of chemotherapy received in each group was as follows: D(35) group, 4; D(40) group, 3; D(75) group, 4. The objective response rates were as follows: D(35) group, 17.2%; D(40) group, 10.9%; D(75) group, 6.1% (p = 0.615). The major toxicity was myelosuppression. Grades 3/4 leukopenia and neutropenia were significantly higher in the D(75) arm of the study (p < 0.001). Drug-induced pneumonitis occurred more frequently in patients on a weekly schedule than in those on a schedule of every 3-weeks (p = 0.05). The median survival times were as follows: D(35) group, 8.4 months; D(40) group, 7.2 months; and D(75) group, 9.5 months (p = 0.855). The 1-year survival rates were 32.8%, 31.9%, and 28.7%, respectively. Lung cancer symptom scores showed no obvious differences among the different treatment arms, except for some minor items. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly docetaxel chemotherapy produces less myelosuppression, and better compliance and response rates than the conventional chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks. These effects were more evident in the D(35) group weekly schedule than in the D(40) weekly schedule. However, physicians should pay more attention to the possibility of a higher frequency of docetaxel-induced pneumonitis in patients receiving treatment on the weekly schedule of treatment.     

Successful peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with etoposide (VP-16) in patients with relapsed or resistant lymphoma who failed cyclophosphamide mobilization.

High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by autologous blood stem cell transplantation is considered the treatment of choice for patients with relapsed or resistant aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or Hodgkin's disease (HD). However, several authors report failure of standard mobilization regimens in 29% to 56% of these patients making the completion of HDCT impossible and as a result, negatively influencing long-term outcome. Thus, effective new regimens for patients failing initial mobilization are needed. Here we report the results of using etoposide as a mobilizing agent in 16 patients with primary resistant or relapsed malignant lymphoma who had failed prior mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) with cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) followed by G-CSF. The use of etoposide 500 mg/m2 (days 1-4) + G-CSF resulted in the successful collection of adequate numbers of PBSC with a median harvest of 3.6 x 10(6)/kg (range 2.2-12.6) CD34+ cells in all 16 patients. In 7/16 (44%) patients, the target yield of at least 2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells was harvested by a single apheresis and the maximum number of separations for all patients was two. No excessive toxicities appeared, allowing all patients to proceed to myeloablative chemotherapy. In addition, median peak values of circulating CD34+ cells were significantly higher after etoposide as compared to cyclophosphamide (49.2/microl vs 4.7/microl; P = 0.0004). These results indicate that etoposide + G-CSF is a highly effective mobilization regimen in patients who have failed cyclophosphamide mobilization.     

Intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is a valid alternative to high-dose cyclophosphamide for mobilizing peripheral blood CD34+ cells in patients with multiple myeloma

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) are widely used in the setting of dose-intensive chemotherapies in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Although the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), following chemotherapy or not, is considered the standard growth factor for mobilizing PBSC, the optimal chemotherapeutic regimen still remains to be defined. Cyclophosphamide (CTX) is an effective drug in the treatment of MM which is capable of mobilizing PBSC if followed by growth factors, even though administration of high-dose CTX (7 g/m(2)) results in severe toxicity requiring hospitalization and increasing costs. We have retrospectively analyzed the results obtained in 38 newly diagnosed MM patients treated with 1.2 g/m(2) CTX on days 1 and 3 combined with 40 mg dexamethasone daily for 4 days. The results were compared with those obtained in 25 newly diagnosed MM patients treated with 7 g/m(2) CTX. A higher number of CD34+ cells/kg was collected during the first leukapheresis and a statistically significant lower consumption of G-CSF was observed following two doses of 1.2 g/m(2) CTX compared to the 7 g/m(2) CTX dose. The possibility of treating patients with day-hospital regimens, with a satisfactory yield of hematopoietic cells harvested, may have relevant economic implications for treatment strategies in MM patients.     

Phase II study of high dose epirubicin in combination with cyclophosphamide in patients with advanced breast cancer

Abstract Background: Combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer will palliate symptoms in the majority of patients but only a small percentage will have prolonged survival. Higher doses of doxorubicin lead to increased response rates in breast cancer and early studies have shown that epirubicin could be tolerated in higher doses with less relative toxicity than doxorubicin. Aims: This study was initiated to assess the dose of epirubicin that could be tolerated by escalating its dose while maintaining a fixed dose of cyclophosphamide. Simultaneously tumour response rate, spectrum of toxicities, duration of response and overall survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer were assessed. Methods: Patients with metastatic breast cancer commenced chemotherapy with a starting dose of epirubicin of 120 milligram per metre squared (mg/m²) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m². The dose of epirubicin was to be escalated or reduced depending on toxicity. Results: Forty female patients were entered into this study and three patients withdrew because of toxicity. Overall tumour response rate was 75% with 27.5% of patients obtaining a complete response. Median time to progressive disease was 35 weeks and median overall survival was 48 weeks, with median survival for complete responders being 103 weeks. Thirty-one (77%) patients completed five or more courses of treatment. Haematological toxicity was the main side effect and 70% of patients required a dose reduction. No patients were eligible for a dose escalation. One patient died as a consequence of neutropenic sepsis. Four (10%) patients had treatment ceased because of decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction and one patient died as a consequence of heart failure. Four patients remain alive. Conclusions: High dose epirubicin combined with cyclophosphamide is an effective treatment regimen for metastatic breast cancer obtaining higher overall response rates with increased percentage complete responses compared to conventional dose chemotherapy. Although toxicity was increased, high dose chemotherapy was well tolerated and mortality associated with treatment was not increased. No dose escalations of epirubicin were possible and a dose of 90mg/m² of epirubicin would be the maximum dose when used in combination with cyclophosphamide. Further trials are required to determine the influence of this high dose therapy on survival duration and whether comparable benefits can be achieved with shorter durations of therapy. (Aust NZ J Med 1995; 25: 474–478.)     

Multiple cycles of dose-intensive chemotherapy with repeated stem cell support as induction treatment in metastatic breast cancer: a feasibility study

The purpose of this trial was to study feasibility and tolerance of a dose-intensive multicyclic alternating induction chemotherapy with repeated stem cell support in a series of 43 metastatic breast cancer patients. Anthracycline-naive patients (n = 21) received cyclophosphamide 2.5 g/m(2) plus doxorubicin 80 mg/m(2) alternating every 14 days with paclitaxel 200-350 mg/m(2) plus cisplatin 120 mg/m(2). Patients who had previously received anthracyclines (n = 22) received cisplatin 120 mg/m(2) plus etoposide 600 mg/m(2) alternating with paclitaxel 200-350 mg/m(2) plus ifosfamide 8 g/m(2). Peripheral blood stem cells were infused after every course except the first, with a median CD34(+) dose of 2.1 x 10(6)/kg per cycle. Positive selection of CD34(+) cells was performed in good mobilizers. The median number of cycles administered was six (4-8), and the time interval between them was 17 days. Median summation dose intensities (SDI) actually administered for the CA-TP and PE-TI protocol were 4.95 and 4.69, respectively (87% of scheduled SDI). There were 15 complete (35%) and 21 partial responses (49%), for an overall response rate of 84% (95% CI, 73%-95%). Infection or neutropenic fever occurred in 50% of the cycles. There was one treatment-related death. After a median follow-up of 26 months, the median event-free-survival was 12 months (95% CI: 10-14) and overall survival was 31 months. These high dose-intensity induction treatments seem to be feasible with sequential stem cell support.