Mode of delivery for breech presentation in grandmultiparous women.

OBJECTIVES: To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes of planned vaginal delivery vs. elective cesarean delivery for breech presentation at term. METHODS: Retrospective study of term breech deliveries from January 1997 through December 2000. A group of 128 women for whom vaginal delivery was planned was compared with a group of 122 women who had an elective cesarean delivery with regard to neonatal mortality and morbidity (birth trauma, birth asphyxia, hyperbilirubinemia, and duration of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit) and maternal morbidity (infections, hemorrhage, hysterectomy, deep venous thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism). RESULTS: There was no difference in neonatal mortality and morbidity between the two groups (13.0% vs. 9.4%). There were fewer maternal complications in the planned vaginal group than in the elective cesarean group (5.5% vs. 18%; P<0.01). In the planned vaginal delivery group 70% of multiparas and 85% of grandmultiparas were delivered vaginally compared with 50% of nulliparas. CONCLUSIONS: In breech presentations at term vaginal delivery can be achieved in 85% of grandmultiparas without significant neonatal morbidity. Elective cesarean section is associated with increased maternal morbidity compared with planned vaginal delivery.     

Breech deliveries and cesarean section

Breech presentation is the most common malpresentation, with about 3-4% of singleton fetuses presenting breech at delivery. Management of breech presentation has been a contentious issue with a lowering threshold for cesarean section in recent years. Perinatal mortality and morbidity are estimated to be three times that of comparable infants with vertex presentation. Breech presentation is commonly associated with certain adverse maternal and fetal factors which inherently give rise to increased perinatal morbidity and mortality. At present, most obstetricians favor cesarean delivery for uncomplicated pre-term breech. Controlled prospective studies have shown that the outcome of breech fetuses weighing more than 1500 g was not dependent on the mode of delivery. A more recent review from the Cochrane database by Grant does not justify a policy of elective cesarean section for pre-term breech. Vaginal delivery is preferred if the following criteria are met: frank breech only, estimated fetal weight of 2500-3500 g, adequate pelvimetry without hyperextended head, normal progression of labor, no evidence of fetal hypoxia under continuous fetal monitoring, and maternal weight under 90 kg. Vaginal delivery of frank breech at term may be just as safe as cesarean section when careful selection criteria are used. If these criteria are not fulfilled, or fetal monitoring cannot be performed, cesarean section is advisable.     

Route of breech delivery and maternal and neonatal outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes in elective cesarean vs. attempted vaginal delivery for breech presentation at or near term. METHODS: We reviewed the maternal and neonatal charts of all singleton breech deliveries of at least 35 weeks' gestation or 2000 g delivered between 1986 and 1997 at our institution. Patients delivered by elective cesarean were compared to those attempting a vaginal delivery. The neonatal outcomes analyzed were: corrected mortality; Apgar scores less than 7 at 5 min; abnormal umbilical cord blood gases; birth trauma; and admissions to the intensive care nursery. Maternal morbidity was also assessed and compared. RESULTS: Of 848 women meeting criteria for evaluation, 576 were delivered by elective cesarean while 272 attempted a vaginal delivery. Of 272 women undergoing a trial of labor, 203 (74.6%) were delivered vaginally, while 69 (25.4%) failed an attempt at vaginal delivery and underwent a cesarean. When comparing patients delivered by elective cesarean with those attempting a vaginal delivery, no significant differences were noted in neonatal outcomes. However, maternal morbidity was higher among women delivered by cesarean, regardless of the indications for the procedure. Similar neonatal and maternal results were noted when nulliparous patients were analyzed separately. CONCLUSIONS: Cesarean delivery of selected near-term infants presenting as breech is associated with increased maternal morbidity without corresponding improvement in neonatal outcomes.     

Breech presentation and vaginal delivery: evolution of acceptability by obstetricians and patients

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of obstetrician and patient respectively on mode of delivery in case of breech presentation at term. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included all women with a singleton pregnancy in a breech presentation delivered at term in a tertiary care maternity unit from January 1998 to December 2004. Mode of delivery was suggested by a score based on maternal age, parity, obstetrical past history, radiopelvimetry and cephalopelvic confrontation. The obstetrician was free to follow or not the score indication and patient's informed consent was required concerning the mode of delivery. Our main outcome measurements were mode of delivery and neonatal parameters. RESULTS: Two hundred cases were identified. Elective cesarean section increased progressively (from 52% in 1998 to 80% in 2004 [P=0,002]). Neonatal status and proportion of score in favour of vaginal birth remained stable during the study period. The rise in cesarean section rate was mainly due to patient's request (P=0,001) whereas the trend of obstetrician in favour of cesarean did not reach significance (P=0,3). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The rise of elective cesarean section for term breech delivery in a maternity unit using a predefinite score is mainly induced by patient's request. This evolution has no effect on neonatal status.     

Management of the selected term breech presentation: assessment of the risks of selected vaginal delivery versus cesarean section for all cases

In this study, the concepts of decision theory have been applied to a clinical obstetric controversy--the management of the selected mature breech presentation. We have reviewed in detail the literature published since 1974 and estimated the probabilities of various outcomes after different treatment strategies. We conclude that a policy of selected vaginal delivery will result in four perinatal deaths for every 1000 patients delivered. A similar probability of neurologic handicap, at least until discharge from hospital, can also be attributed to this method of delivery. These unfavorable outcomes were reported less frequently in more recent reports covering the years since 1974. In these cases, the probability of fetal death due to a trial of vaginal delivery is approximately two in 1000. Cesarean section rates have risen, however, and 18-40% of trials of labor for breech presentation now result in "emergency" cesarean section. Decision analysis has demonstrated that a policy of elective cesarean section for all cases would not necessarily increase maternal mortality and morbidity. Thus the greater dangers of emergency compared with nonelective surgery may abolish the advantages of attempting a vaginal delivery. Depending on the relative dangers of elective and emergency cesarean section, planned delivery becomes the safer option when 16-30% of trials of vaginal breech delivery are unsuccessful. The strength and limitations of this probabilistic approach to the breech presentation are discussed in detail.     

Antepartum detection of cord presentation by transvaginal ultrasonography for term breech presentation: potential prediction and prevention of cord prolapse

AIM: We evaluated the efficacy of antepartum screening for cord presentation by trans-vaginal ultrasonography (TVS) on predicting and preventing umbilical cord prolapse (UCP) in term breech delivery. METHODS: We investigated every woman with a breech-presenting fetus for cord presentation by weekly TVS after 36 weeks of gestation since 1995. If the cord was found in advance of fetal presenting parts, we recommended her to undergo elective cesarean section to avoid UCP. We studied the incidence of cord presentation by TVS and the clinical courses of the cases with it for 198 women who delivered breech after 36 weeks from 1995 to 2005 (group A). Further, the incidence of UCP was compared between group A and another 230 women who delivered breech at term from 1983 to 1994 (group B). RESULTS: Cord presentation was detected by TVS at least once in eight (4%) group A patients. Seven of them underwent elective cesarean section and, in six of these (86%), cord presentation was still found at the time of operation. The eighth patient became free of cord presentation at the later examinations and delivered vaginally without UCP. A hundred and twenty-one (61%) women in group A and 159 (69%) women in group B delivered vaginally. No UCP occurred in group A, while it occurred in 10 (4%) cases of group B (P < 0.01), and one baby died of it. CONCLUSIONS: Detection of cord presentation by TVS has a potential to predict and reduce UCP in breech delivery at term.     

Randomized management of the nonfrank breech presentation at term: a preliminary report

Cesarean section has become the standard management used by many clinicians for breech presentation in labor. Proof of the superiority of routine cesarean section has been largely circumstantial. Concern over rising cesarean section rates has led to renewed interest in possible alternatives. Protocols have been developed to select which patients may be allowed a trial of labor with frank breech presentation at term. We undertook a prospective clinical trial comparing elective cesarean section with a selective management protocol for the nonfrank breech presentation at term. One hundred five patients with nonfrank breech presentations at term in labor were studied. Seventy (67%) were randomized to a trial of labor and 35 (33%) to elective cesarean section. Of the patients allowed a trial of labor, 31 (44%) were delivered vaginally, and 39 (56%) required cesarean section. The largest single cause of a "failed" trial of labor was inadequate pelvic dimensions on x-ray pelvimetry (23 patients, 59%). Neonatal morbidity assessed by Apgar scores, cord gases, birth injury, and hospital stay was not different for those delivered vaginally or by cesarean section. Maternal morbidity in terms of febrile morbidity, blood transfusion, wound infections, and hospital stay was significantly greater among women delivered by cesarean section. Two of three neonatal deaths occurred in infants with major congenital anomalies. The third infant, apparently normal, died after vaginal delivery. Extensive evaluation suggests the death was attributable to inadequate resuscitation. We conclude that the use of a selective management protocol under controlled conditions is a reasonable alternative to elective cesarean section. Approximately one half of patients allowed a trial of labor may be expected to deliver vaginally with neonatal morbidity comparable to that seen with cesarean section.     

Balancing the risks of planned cesarean section and trial of vaginal delivery for the mature, selected, singleton breech presentation

The experience of mature, singleton, vaginal breech delivery over the last decade in our hospital is reviewed. This constitutes the largest series of breech delivery reported for over twelve years. Unlike all but two previous reports, we analyze our results by management policy; elective cesarean section, trial of vaginal breech delivery and cesarean section as soon as the diagnosis of breech delivery was made on labor ('expedite' cesarean operations). Six intrapartum or neonatal deaths occurred among 613 patients selected for trial of vaginal delivery--a rate of one per cent. There were none following 217 elective or 69 expedite cesarean sections. A detailed review of the literature over the last decade confirms that trial of vaginal delivery is more dangerous to the fetus and results in about one perinatal death of a normally formed infant in 200 deliveries. Apgar scores were slightly lower following trial of vaginal delivery and there were more irritable or injured babies in this group. The last intrapartum or neonatal death occurred in 1981. However, the elective cesarean section rate has increased from 14 to 33 per cent over this time period. Similarly the rate of failed trial of vaginal breech delivery has increased from 15 to 31 per cent. The proportion of failed trials was highest where the fetus was large but clinicians were poor at estimating fetal weight. Decision theory is used to examine the maternal utility of trial of vaginal breech delivery versus elective cesarean section when the intrapartum cesarean rate rises to these levels. It is shown that, from the point of view of maternal mortality and morbidity in the current pregnancy, trial of vaginal delivery maybe the more dangerous maternal option. Thus a low threshold for cesarean section in labor leads to greater fetal safety at the mother's expense. It is nevertheless concluded that maternal attitude and the long-term effects of a uterine scar should be considered in the final decision.     

The management of breech presentation in the last three decades

In order to evaluate the changes in management of breech presentation during the last three decades, a retrospective analysis of the "Alexandra" Hospital records was undertaken. The years, 1965, 1975, 1985, 1995 and finally 1997 were used as pilot years for this purpose. The cesarean section, breech presentation and breech cesarean section rates were calculated for each year. Specific breech cesarean section rates in respect to birth weight and parity as well as perinatal mortality rates were also recorded for each pilot year. The overall cesarean section rate rose from 8.0% in 1965 to 25.2% in 1995 and 25.1% in 1997 while the breech cesarean rate climbed from 16.9% in 1965 to 74.1% in 1995 and 72.3% in 1997, irrespective of birth weight. A trend towards vaginal delivery of breeches in multiparous women till 1985 became less apparent in later years. During the same period, a marked decrease of the perinatal mortality rate was observed from 70.1/1000 in 1965 to 36.6/1000 in 1997. In conclusion, a more than four-fold increase of the breech cesarean section rate was apparently rewarded by a two-fold decrease in perinatal mortality.     

Induction of labor in breech presentation.

OBJECTIVE: Induction of labor in breech presentation, although not contraindicated, has rarely been reported. We have undertaken to evaluate the safety and outcome of this practice in two Israeli institutions along with a literature review of this controversial subject. METHOD: The research design was a retrospective case control study covering the years: 1980-1999. We have studied 53 term (>37 weeks) breech deliveries induced for various medical and obstetrical reasons, in two major regional hospitals in Israel. Induction was performed with prostaglandin E(2) for the unripe cervix and with oxytocin for induction or augmentation when the cervix was ripe. Six women were induced by nipple stimulation. Controls were 53 women with spontaneous labor in breech presentation that had a trial of vaginal delivery, and 54 women with breech presentation who delivered by elective cesarean section. RESULT: No significant difference in the various maternal and fetal outcomes was observed. CS rate was comparable in both study and control groups (34% vs. 32%) and two-thirds gave birth vaginally. CONCLUSIONS: In properly selected and carefully managed cases of breech presentation, induction of labor seems a safe and reasonable option.     

Good perinatal outcome in selective vaginal breech delivery at term

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To compare perinatal outcome in groups of planned vaginal breech delivery, elective cesarean section with the fetus in breech presentation, and planned vaginal delivery with the fetus in cephalic presentation in a university hospital with a tradition of managing breech deliveries by the vaginal route. METHODS: A cohort study from a 7-year period 1995-2002, including 590 planned vaginal deliveries with a term (> 37 weeks) singleton fetus in breech presentation, 396 elective cesarean sections with a term singleton fetus in breech presentation, and 590 control women intending vaginal delivery with a singleton term fetus in cephalic presentation. RESULTS: The Apgar scores were lower in the group of planned vaginal breech delivery, but in other outcome measures there were no significant intergroup differences. The overall neonatal morbidity was small (1.2% vs. 0.5% vs. 0.3% in the respective study groups) if compared to a recently published randomized multicenter study. CONCLUSIONS: Selective vaginal breech deliveries may be safely undertaken in units having a tradition of vaginal breech deliveries.     

1389例剖宫产术回顾分析

回顾性分析１０年剖宫产术１３８９例。结果是平均剖宫产率为２３％，无孕产妇死亡，围产几平均死亡率为１２．６３‰。剖宫产主要指征为相对性头盆不称，胎儿宫内窘迫，臀位、骨盆狭窄。提示提高剖宫产率并不一定能降低围产儿死亡率，恰当掌握剖宫产指征，加强对孕期及产程的监测、管理，既可能降低母婴死亡率，又能适当控制剖宫产率。     

Breech presentation after cesarean section: always a section?

A retrospective review of 71 breech deliveries after previous cesarean was done to determine the need for repeat cesarean section. Twenty-four (33.8%) women were allocated to the elective repeat cesarean section group and forty-seven (66.2%) patients were allocated to a trial of labor group. Thirty-seven (78.7%) were delivered of their infants vaginally. A total of 37 of the 71 women (52.1%) had successful vaginal deliveries. Neonatal morbidity did not differ for women who were delivered vaginally or by cesarean section. Maternal febrile morbidity was significantly higher in the cesarean section group than in the vaginal delivery group (p less than 0.001). On the basis of these data, a trial of labor seems reasonable in carefully selected cases of breech presentation after a previous cesarean section.     

Vaginal breech delivery at term and neonatal morbidity and mortality – a population-based cohort study in Sweden

Introduction: The routine to deliver almost all term breech cases by elective cesarean section (CS) has continued to be debated due to the risk of maternal and neonatal complications. The aims of the study were (1) to investigate if mode of delivery impacts on the risk of morbidity and mortality among term infants in breech presentation and (2) to compare the rates of severe neonatal complications and mortality in relation to presentation and mode of delivery.

Methods: This population-based cohort study used data from the Swedish Medical Birth Register. All women (and their newborn infants) with singleton pregnancies who gave birth at term to an infant in breech (n?=?27,357) or cephalic presentation (n?=?837,494) between 2001 and 2012 were included. Births with vacuum extraction and induced labors were excluded, as well as antepartum stillbirths, births with infants diagnosed with congenital malformations and multiple births.

Results: On one hand, the rates of neonatal complications and mortality were higher among infants born in vaginal breech compared to the vaginal cephalic group. On the other hand, after CS, the rates of all neonatal complications under study and neonatal mortality were lower among infants in breech presentation than in those in cephalic presentation. After adjustment for confounders, infants delivered in vaginal breech had 23.8 times higher odds AOR (ratio) for brachial plexus injury, 13.3 times higher odds ratio for Apgar score <7 at 5?min, 6.7 times higher odds of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), or convulsions and 7.6 higher odds ratio for perinatal mortality than those delivered by elective CS.

Conclusions: Despite a probable selection of women who before-hand were considered at low risk and, therefore, could be recommended vaginal breech delivery, infants delivered in vaginal breech faced substantially increased risks of severe neonatal complications compared with infants in breech presentations delivered by elective CS.

• Key message

• Vaginal breech delivery is associated with increased risk for severe neonatal complications.

     

Perinatal mortality and morbidity in breech presentation.

The perinatal mortality associated with breech presentation at the Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, between 1974 and 1976 was 10.4%, or almost 5 times the overall hospital figure. Nine of 487 infants (1.8%) weighing greater than or equal to 2500 g died in the perinatal period, but 7 were already dead at the onset of labor or had congenital abnormalities incompatible with life. Sixty of 177 infants (33.9%) weighing 1000-2499 g died in the perinatal period, but 28 of these died due to prematurity alone or from complications of intrauterine hypoxia or birth trauma. Although elective cesarean section for breech presentation could not be justified for infants weighing greater than or equal to 2500 g, this procedure may well reduce the perinatal loss of premature infants by reducing the incidence of intrauterine hypoxia and preventing birth trauma.     

Evaluation of a feto-pelvic scoring system in the management of breech presentations

A feto-pelvic scoring system comprising maternal pelvimetric data, estimated fetal weight, type of breech presentation and previous obstetric history was used in selecting patients for cesarean section of vaginal delivery. A maximum score of 20 points was possible. Twelve points or less indicated cesarean section. During 1973-1975 224 singleton breech deliveries were evaluated. In 29.5% cesarean section was performed and in 83% of these it could be planned in advance. In 70.5% of cases, patients were allowed to deliver vaginally under continuous electronic monitoring of the fetal heart rate. There was one intrapartum death and only one early neonatal death of a small premature child. In two cases intrauterine death had occurred already in the antepartum period. The uncorrected perinatal mortality was 17.9 per 1000 but not significantly different from the uncorrected perinatal mortality of 8.0 per 1000 for all patients delivered at the Danderyd's Hospital during the period 1972-1975 (12832 births). The corrected mortality resulting from breech presentation was 8.9 per 1000. The infants exhibited similar and excellent 5 min Apgar scores whether delivered vaginally or by cesarean section or matched with a randomized control series of 1000 cephalic presentations.     

Comparison of vaginal and cesarean section delivery for fetuses in breech presentation

OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to evaluate the perinatal mortality and morbidity of deliveries with fetuses presenting by the breech comparing outcomes of two groups according to mode of delivery: vaginal and cesarean section. RESULTS: Of 756 fetuses studied, 271 were delivered vaginally and 485 by cesarean section. In infants weighing > or = 1500 grams, "further corrected" mortality and morbidity rates were low and similar for both delivery routes: one neonatal death (NNM) in each. Among very low birth weight (VLBW) infants (< 1500 grams) the "further corrected" mortality rate was higher in the vaginal group: 57.4%, and 18.0% in abdominal deliveries (odds ratio [OR] = 6.1, 95% CI: 3.1 to 12.1). Likewise, rate of depression at five minutes were higher in the vaginal group (p < 0.001). However, the average fetal weight among the vaginal deliveries VLBW (787 grams) was 250 grams less than in the cesarean section group (1040 grams). After adjustment for fetal weight, gestational age, and other prognostic variables the odds ratio for neonatal death was no longer statistically significant (adjusted OR = 2.1, 95% CI: 0.9 to 5.2, p = 0.105). Comparison of planned vaginal delivery with elective cesarean section yielded smaller differences (adjusted OR for neonatal death = 1.3, 95% CI: 0.6 to 2.9, p = 0.525). CONCLUSION: The poor perinatal outcomes of breech delivered infants are due primarily to VLBW, congenital malformations, and premature labor. Although abdominal delivery had a lower NNM rate than vaginal delivery, the difference was not significant after adjustment for confounding factors. The results confirm the findings of a previously analyzed similar series delivered at our institution between 1980 and 1987. They suggest that, with appropriate technique, abdominal delivery is not mandatory in breech presentation.     

Changing indications for cesarean section. A 38-year experience at a community hospital

A review of a 38-year experience with cesarean section at a community hospital shows considerable change in both the rate and indication of cesarean sections. A marked increase in the cesarean section rate was noted after 1972. This increase was due primarily to an increase in the primary cesarean section rate for cephalopelvic disproportion and labor abnormalities, fetal distress, and the breech presentation. As a result of this study, we anticipate a primary cesarean section rate of approximately 10%: 3-5% for cephalopelvic disproportion and labor abnormalities, 1-1 1/2% for fetal distress, 3% for breech presentation, and 1-2% for all other indications.     

Comparison of maternal mortality and morbidity between trial of labor and elective cesarean section among women with previous cesarean delivery

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to assess the safety of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of 308,755 Canadian women with previous cesarean delivery between 1988 and 2000. Occurrences of in-hospital maternal death, uterine rupture, and other severe maternal morbidity were compared between women with a trial of labor and those with an elective cesarean section. RESULTS: Rates of uterine rupture (0.65%), transfusion (0.19%), and hysterectomy (0.10%) were significantly higher in the trial-of-labor group. Maternal in-hospital death rate, however, was lower in the trial-of-labor group (1.6 per 100,000) than in the elective cesarean section group (5.6 per 100,000). The association between trial of labor and uterine rupture was stronger in low volume (<500) than in high volume (> or =500 births per year) obstetric units. CONCLUSION: Trial of labor is associated with increased risk of uterine rupture, but elective cesarean section may increase the risk of maternal death.