Application of muscle relaxants for rapid-sequence induction of anaesthesia

The present study evaluates the use of muscle relaxants for rapid-sequence induction (RSI) and different application techniques (pre-curarisation, priming, timing) as a part of a nationwide survey in Germany. In 86.8% of anaesthesia departments succinylcholine is used for RSI and an average of 56.5% of respondents used only succinylcholine for RSI. Of all non-depolarising muscle relaxants rocuronium is the most frequently used alternative. Of the anaesthesia departments 2.6% use rocuronium regularly in patients with increased risk for aspiration of stomach contents; level one centres significantly more than others, 12.9% answered that pre-curarisation techniques were never used, whereas 45.6% use non-depolarising neuromuscular blocking drugs before giving succinylcholine in 80-100% of cases. Priming is not used by 64.4% of respondents, as opposed to 9.8% who utilise this technique regularly. The statements regarding timing are 71.1% and 5.4%, respectively. Alcuronium is used for RSI in departments in which the financial aspect is the primary decision criteria. Despite ist known side-effects and the on-going discussion over the past years, succinylcholine is still the most frequently used muscle relaxants for RSI. Priming is often declined by anaesthetists in Germany, most probably due to the absence of clear advantages and the possibility of severe complications. It is the opinion of the authors that timing but also drugs with a slow onset (e.g., alcuronium and Pancuronium) are obsolete in the context of RSI.     

The role of muscle relaxants in total intravenous anaesthesia

For total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA), all drugs that are required as part of the anaesthetic method are administered intravenously. This is usually taken to imply the use of intravenous infusions. It is normal practice to administer muscle relaxants intravenously, although other routes have been used. A muscle relaxant is required firstly to secure paralysis and secondly to maintain paralysis. The rate of onset of all the nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents which are routinely available at present is similar; it takes about 3–6 min for a normal clinical dose to reach maximum effect. Maintenance of an adequate level of block is necessary, and it is usually helpful to the surgeon for the level of block to be relatively constant. The choice of drug is important. It should cause negligible side-effects. For administration by infusion, an agent with an intermediate (e. g., atracurium) or short (e. g., mivacurium) duration of action is essential to ensure a rapid recovery of effect on termination of the infusion. The routine use of neuromuscular monitoring is recommended when a continuous infusion of a relaxant is used.     

Application of muscle relaxants in Germany. A survey of German anaesthesia departments

AIM. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use and application of muscle relaxants and neuromuscular monitoring in Germany. METHODS. A total of 2,996 questionnaires were sent out to the heads of German anaesthesia departments and private anaesthesia practices.The questions covered frequency of muscle relaxants used,how they were used, and neuromuscular monitoring. Influences on the way muscle relaxants were used could be derived from the desire for specific properties of a muscle relaxant, the desire for different monitoring conditions and from the size of the institution.We correlated these features with application practice using logistic regression analyses. RESULTS. Of the 2,996 questionnaires 2,058 could be analysed (68.6%).Amongst those were 102 level one hospitals (5%) and 903 private practices (44%).The replies from 350 (17%) departments were based on surveyed data, 1,613 (78.5%) were based on estimations. The desire for certain properties of muscle relaxants correlated with the use in practice, as were the desire for a non-depolarizing replacement for succinylcholine, the size of the department and the frequency of use of neuromuscular monitoring.Over 50% of all German anaesthesia departments limited the use of muscle relaxants to three.The use of laryngeal masks reduced the use of muscle relaxants. CONCLUSIONS. The survey regarding use of muscle relaxants in Germany could for the first time give an overview on the use of anaesthesia-specific substances in Germany. From the different frequencies of use and use modalities,conclusions could be drawn towards a standard of application for the year 2000.Changes in this standard would raise the need for further trend surveys.The methods of statistical analysis and survey evaluation can be used as a base for further surveys.     

Tracheal intubation after induction of anaesthesia with thiopentone or propofol without muscle relaxants

This study was designed to compare the ease of performing laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation without muscle relaxants after the induction of anaesthesia with either thiopentone or propofol in 106 patients scheduled for elective surgery. Thiopentone (5 mg/kg) or propofol (2.5 mg/kg), supplemented with lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg) and alfentanil (30 micrograms/kg), were used in random order for the induction of anaesthesia. Jaw tone, visualisation of the larynx, position of vocal cords, ease of intubation and tolerance of the tracheal tube were assessed. The jaw was relaxed and the vocal cords were immobile/open in most patients in both groups. Visualisation of the larynx was good in 60 and 46% and intubation was easy in 48 and 22% of the patients given thiopentone and propofol, respectively (P less than 0.05 between groups for intubation). After induction of anaesthesia with thiopentone or propofol, endotracheal intubation is not recommended without the use of muscle relaxants.     

Total intravenous anaesthesia: a technique using flunitrazepam, ketamine, muscle relaxants and controlled ventilation of the lung

A potentially acceptable and uncomplicated technique of total intravenous anaesthesia is described using flunitrazepam for induction, and maintenance by ketamine infusion with neuromuscular blockade and controlled ventilation using oxygen-enriched room air. A significant complication was the 23% incidence of nausea and/or vomiting encountered in the fifty-six patients studied. Definite factual recall of the surgical experience was reported by one patient. This was attributable to an accidental error in technique. Postoperative drowsiness was also a feature of the technique. The usual cardiovascular and psychomimetic effects associated with ketamine administration appeared markedly attenuated by flunitrazepam induction. Fifty-three (96.3%) patients expressed their willingness to receive the same anaesthetic again. Further experience of total intravenous anaesthesia with the introduction of cerebral function monitoring, allowing correlation of depth of anaesthesia with drug dosage, should allow further refinement of the technique to ensure successful and acceptable anaesthesia.     

Awareness and general anaesthesia

A state exists after the induction of anaesthesia in which patients may be aware of their surroundings yet unable to communicate. This problem of awareness and recall during general anaesthesia is a recent one in the relatively short history of anaesthesia. Prior to the introduction of muscle relaxants in 1942 by Griffith and Johnson, it was felt that "light anaesthesia" would be signified by violent movements. Today, the concepts of anaesthetic depth, awareness, and recall have become more complicated with the addition of numerous newer, shorter-acting, intravenous anaesthetic agents with varying effects on the conscious state. Several methods have been described to detect awareness. None has yet been found to be totally reliable and numerous reports of awareness can be found in the literature. Light inhalation and total intravenous anaesthesia have been blamed for the majority of these case reports. However, awareness during total intravenous anaesthesia is avoidable with the proper use of a combination of a hypnotic and an analgesic such as midazolam and alfentanil for general anaesthesia.     

Total intravenous anaesthesia without muscle relaxants in a child with diagnosed Duchenne muscular dystrophy

The case of a 3 year old child, affected by Duchenne muscular dystrophy, who underwent adenoidectomy and bilateral myringotomy, is reported. Total intravenous anaesthesia (propofol 1% infusion (160 micrograms kg-1min-1) and remifentanil (0.55 microgram kg-1min-1) without any muscle relaxants was used. The postoperative period was uneventful.