Recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I treatment for 1 week improves metabolic control in type 2 diabetes by ameliorating hepatic and muscle insulin resistance

The administration of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I (rhIGF-I) reduces hyperglycemia and insulin requirements in subjects with severe insulin resistance syndromes and in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, the mechanisms responsible for the improved metabolic control are incompletely understood. One proposed mechanism is that rhIGF-I therapy in T2DM may bypass early defects in insulin action (i.e. signal transduction), leading to improved hepatic and/or peripheral insulin sensitivity. To test this hypothesis, we used the euglycemic insulin clamp to measure the response to 7 days of rhIGF-I therapy (80 microg/kg, sc, twice daily) in eight poorly controlled T2DM subjects. rhIGF-I significantly improved fasting (203 +/- 12 vs. 134 +/- 14 mg/dL; P < 0.01) and day-long (0800-1700 h; 234 +/- 11 vs. 153 +/- 10 mg/dL; P < 0.01) plasma glucose levels. Basal endogenous glucose production decreased from 3.2 +/- 0.2 to 2.7 +/- 0.2 mg/kg lean body mass x min (P < 0.03) despite a concomitant decline in the fasting plasma insulin concentration from 13 +/- 5 to 5 +/- 1 microU/mL (P < 0.01). The decrement in basal endogenous glucose production was closely correlated with the decrement in fasting plasma glucose concentration (r = 0.78; P < 0.01). Whole body insulin-stimulated glucose disposal increased by 27% (from 5.6 +/- 0.8 to 7.1 +/- 0.8 mg/kg lean body mass x min; P < 0.01), but remained well below that observed in age- and weight-matched healthy subjects. The effects of rhIGF-I on endogenous glucose production and peripheral insulin sensitivity resemble those observed with intensified insulin regimens in T2DM. We conclude that 7 days of sc rhIGF-I improves glucose control by improving hepatic and muscle insulin sensitivity, but it remains markedly abnormal. This indicates that an intrinsic defect(s) responsible for insulin resistance in T2DM cannot be overcome by rhIGF-I treatment.     

Prandial regulation of ghrelin secretion in humans: does glucagon contribute to the preprandial increase in circulating ghrelin?

OBJECTIVE: Glucagon secretion is stimulated by fasting and inhibited postprandially, a pattern that mimics the secretory profiles of both ghrelin and GH. We thus hypothesized that glucagon may be a determinant of the changes in circulating ghrelin and GH that occur in relation to meals. The objective of the study was to explore this hypothesis by determining the ghrelin and GH response to a bolus of glucagon or saline in healthy subjects. SUBJECTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Nine healthy volunteers, mean age 47 years (range 33-58) and body mass index (BMI) 24 kg/m2 (range 20.9-27.6) were recruited and received either 1 mg glucagon (n = 9) or 1 ml saline (n = 6) subcutaneously on separate days between 0800 and 0830 h after an overnight fast. Venous blood was then sampled at 15-min intervals during the first hour, followed by 30-min intervals up to 4 h for glucose, insulin, GH, cortisol, somatostatin and ghrelin. RESULTS: Mean +/- SE basal ghrelin was 213.1 +/- 34.3 pmol/l and decreased significantly by 15 min after glucagon administration to 179.3 +/- 28 pmol/l (P = 0.01), then remaining suppressed relative to the basal value until 240 min after glucagon. Plasma insulin increased from a basal value of 46.7 +/- 7.7 pmol/l to a peak of 327.1 +/- 54.9 pmol/l (P < 0.0001). There was an inverse statistical relationship between the increase in insulin over the first 120 min and the decrease in ghrelin (P = 0.005), while somatostatin, GH and glucose were not significant contributors to the decrease in ghrelin (P > 0.05). Mean +/- SE basal GH was 7.3 +/- 2.9 microg/l and increased by 150 min after glucagon to a peak of 20.5 +/- 6.8 microg/l (P = 0.006). Changes in neither ghrelin nor glucose were related to the increase in GH (P = 0.7). Saline administration did not produce any significant change in ghrelin, insulin or somatostatin although the expected diurnal reduction in cortisol (P < 0.05) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found no evidence that glucagon stimulates ghrelin secretion in humans and supports the hypothesis that insulin is a negative regulator of ghrelin secretion in the postprandial state. We did not find a negative relationship between endogenous somatostatin and ghrelin despite earlier reports that exogenously administered somatostatin analogues suppress plasma ghrelin. Finally, glucagon-induced GH secretion is not mediated by an increase in plasma ghrelin.     

The endocrine response to acute ghrelin administration is blunted in patients with anorexia nervosa, a ghrelin hypersecretory state

OBJECTIVE: Ghrelin, a gastric-derived natural ligand of the GH secretagogue (GHS)-receptor (GHS-R), strongly stimulates GH secretion but also possesses other neuroendocrine actions, stimulates food intake and modulates the endocrine pancreas and energy homeostasis. Ghrelin secretion is negatively modulated by food intake. Similarly, glucose and also insulin probably exert an inhibitory effect on ghrelin secretion. Fasting ghrelin levels are reduced in obesity, elevated in anorexia nervosa and restored by weight recovery. The chronic elevation of circulating ghrelin levels in anorexia suggested the hypothesis of an alteration of the sensitivity to the orexigenic action of ghrelin in this condition. The aim of this study was to define the endocrine actions of ghrelin in patients with anorexia nervosa. DESIGN: We enrolled nine women with anorexia nervosa of restricter type [AN; age (mean +/- SEM) 24.2 +/- 1.8 years; body mass index (BMI) 14.7 +/- 0.4 kg/m2] and seven normal young women in their early follicular phase as control group (NW; age 30.6 +/- 3.1 years; BMI 20.3 +/- 0.5 kg/m2). MEASUREMENTS: In all the subjects we studied the GH, PRL, ACTH, cortisol, insulin and glucose responses to acute ghrelin administration (1.0 microg/kg as i.v. bolus). The GH response to GHRH (1.0 microg/kg as i.v. bolus) and basal ghrelin and IGF-I levels were also evaluated in all the subjects. RESULTS: Basal morning ghrelin and GH levels in AN (643.6 +/- 21.3 ng/l and 10.4 +/- 0.5 microg/l, respectively) were higher (P < 0.05) than in NW (233.5 +/- 14.2 ng/l and 0.7 +/- 0.7 microg/l, respectively). However, IGF-I levels in AN (145.3 +/- 10.9 microg/l) were lower (P < 0.05) than in NW (325.4 +/- 12.6 microg/l). The GH response to GHRH in AN was higher (P < 0.05) than that in NW, but in AN the GH response to ghrelin was lower (P < 0.05) than that in NW. In AN and NW ghrelin also induced similar increases (P < 0.05) in PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels. Ghrelin administration was followed by significant increase in glucose levels in NW (P < 0.05) but not in AN. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that anorexia nervosa, a clinical condition of ghrelin hypersecretion, shows a specific reduction in the GH response to ghrelin, despite the hyper-responsiveness to GHRH administration. The impaired GH response to ghrelin in anorexia nervosa agrees with previous evidence of blunted GH response to synthetic GH secretagogues and could reflect desensitization of the GHS receptor induced by the chronic elevation of ghrelin levels in this pathological state.     

Eating pattern and the effect of oral glucose on ghrelin and insulin secretion in patients with anorexia nervosa

OBJECTIVE: Ghrelin is thought to be involved in the regulation of eating behaviour and energy metabolism in acute and chronic feeding states. Circulating plasma ghrelin levels in healthy humans have been found to decrease significantly after oral glucose administration. Because it is suggested that eating behaviour may influence the secretion of ghrelin and insulin in anorexia nervosa (AN), we examined the effect of oral glucose on ghrelin and insulin secretion in subtypes of AN patients. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: Twenty female AN patients and 10 age-matched female controls were subjects. The patients were subdivided into two subtypes based on eating behaviour as follows: 11 restricting type (AN-R), nine binge-eating and purging type (AN-BP). Subjects underwent an oral glucose tolerance test at 08.00 h. Blood was collected 0, 30, 60, 120 and 180 min after the glucose load. RESULTS: Both AN-R and AN-BP had a significant increased basal ghrelin level (P < 0.01) and a significantly decreased basal insulin level (P < 0.05) as compared to controls. The time of the nadir of mean ghrelin in AN-BP (120 min, 58.1% of basal level, 204.9 +/- 34.3 pmol/l, mean +/- SEM) was delayed compared to controls (60 min, 60.2%, 74.3 +/- 7.9 pmol/l), and in the AN-R group it kept decreasing for 180 min (80.0%, 182.4 +/- 31.5 pmol/l). The peaks insulin levels in AN-BP (120 min, 319.3 +/- 88.8 pmol/l) and AN-R (180 min, 418.9 +/- 68.4 pmol/l) were also delayed as compared to controls (60 min, 509.2 +/- 88.8 pmol/l). The glucose level at 180 min in AN-R was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than in controls. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that differences in eating behaviour in AN may induce alterations in both ghrelin and insulin metabolism in the acute feeding state. Furthermore, metabolic changes in the restrictive eating pattern may be related to the pathophysiology of small quantitative meal intake in AN-R patients.     

Insulin sensitivity in physically fit and unfit children of parents with Type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: First-degree relatives of patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are often reported to be insulin resistant. We wanted to identify early metabolic abnormalities in this condition, and determine whether they are altered by regular physical training. METHODS: We measured insulin sensitivity using the euglycaemic glucose clamp technique and insulin response to oral glucose in 10 unfit (did not participate in routine physical exercise) offspring of T2DM parents and 10 unfit control subjects, and compared them with six fit (routinely swam for 3 h/day 5 days/week) offspring of T2DM parents and six fit controls with no family history of T2DM. RESULTS: Unfit offspring had a higher plasma glucose response than the other three groups. The mean area under the glucose curve was also significantly higher in unfit offspring than in the other three groups (12.6 +/- 0.6 vs. 10.4 +/- 0.4, 9.6 +/- 0.5, and 9.5 +/- 0.7 mmol/l per hour for the unfit controls, fit offspring and fit controls, respectively; P < 0.05). The corresponding insulin response of unfit offspring was significantly higher at 60 min in the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) that that of fit offspring or fit controls. In addition, the mean area under the insulin curve was significantly greater in unfit offspring than in either fit offspring or fit controls (868 +/- 172 vs. 294 +/- 71, 287 +/- 43 mmol/l per hour, respectively; P < 0.05). Moreover, the glucose disposal rate (GDR), measured using a euglycaemic clamp, was significantly lower in unfit and fit offspring than in unfit and fit controls (5.6 +/- 0.3 vs. 8.6 +/- 0.3 mg/kg per minute; P < 0.01 and 9.3 +/- 0.9 vs. 12.1 +/- 0.8 mg/kg per minute, respectively; P < 0.015), whereas the GDR was similar in unfit controls and fit offspring (8.6 +/- 0.4 vs. 9.3 +/- 0.9 mg/kg per minute; P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: These results support the concept that early metabolic abnormalities, as reflected by a decreased GDR (insulin sensitivity) in the offspring of T2DM patients, may be improved by increased physical fitness.     

Ghrelin administration affects circulating pituitary and gastro-entero-pancreatic hormones in acromegaly

OBJECTIVE: Ghrelin, a gut-brain peptide involved in the control of energy homeostasis, affects antero-pituitary and gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) hormone secretion in healthy subjects. We aimed to verify whether such hormonal responses are retained in acromegaly, a disease characterized by high GH, subnormal ghrelin and abnormal GEP hormone levels. DESIGN AND METHODS: The effect of ghrelin (3.3 microg/kg given after overnight fasting as an i.v. bolus) on GH, prolactin (PRL), adrenocorticotropin (ACTH), cortisol, insulin, glucose, total somatostatin (SS) and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) circulating levels were evaluated in seven non-diabetic patients with newly diagnosed acromegaly and in nine healthy controls. RESULTS: Ghrelin elicited a prompt, marked increase of serum GH and PRL levels in all normal (from 1.6+/-0.6 to 52.9+/-7.8 and from 9.7+/-0.8 to 24.2+/-4.8 microg/l (means+/-S.E.M.), respectively) and acromegalic subjects (from 11.2+/-4.9 to 91.6+/-21.0 and from 42.9+/-26.1 to 113.8+/-79.0 microg/l, respectively). Both plasma ACTH and serum cortisol levels rose significantly in the controls, whereas the cortisol response was blunted in the acromegalic patients. Glucose levels rose earlier and insulin levels fell later in all subjects, with a significantly greater net insulin decrease in acromegalic than in healthy subjects (-80+/-21 vs -17+/-4 pmol/l, P<0.01). A prompt PP rise and a biphasic SS response occurred in all controls, whereas in the acromegalic group the PP response (from 26.1+/-5.0 to 92.2+/-39.0 pmol/l) and the SS response (from 11.9+/-3.0 to 19.7+/-4.0 ng/l) were quite variable. CONCLUSIONS: Ghrelin affects both pituitary and GEP hormones in acromegalic patients as in normal subjects. These findings suggest that ghrelin actions on the energy balance are mediated by complex interactive endocrine loops that involve also the gut and pancreas.     

Exenatide augments first- and second-phase insulin secretion in response to intravenous glucose in subjects with type 2 diabetes

CONTEXT: First-phase insulin secretion (within 10 min after a sudden rise in plasma glucose) is reduced in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2). The incretin mimetic exenatide has glucoregulatory activities in DM2, including glucose-dependent enhancement of insulin secretion. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine whether exenatide can restore a more normal pattern of insulin secretion in subjects with DM2. DESIGN: Fasted subjects received iv insulin infusion to reach plasma glucose 4.4-5.6 mmol/liter. Subjects received iv exenatide (DM2) or saline (DM2 and healthy volunteers), followed by iv glucose challenge. PATIENTS: Thirteen evaluable DM2 subjects were included in the study: 11 males, two females; age, 56 +/- 7 yr; body mass index, 31.7 +/- 2.4 kg/m2; hemoglobin A1c, 6.6 +/- 0.7% (mean +/- sd) treated with diet/exercise (n = 1), metformin (n = 10), or acarbose (n = 2). Controls included 12 healthy, weight-matched subjects with normal glucose tolerance: nine males, three females; age, 57 +/- 9 yr; and body mass index, 32.0 +/- 3.0 kg/m2. SETTING: The study was conducted at an academic hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Plasma insulin, plasma C-peptide, insulin secretion rate (derived by deconvolution), and plasma glucagon were the main outcome measures. RESULTS: DM2 subjects administered saline had diminished first-phase insulin secretion, compared with healthy control subjects. Exenatide-treated DM2 subjects had an insulin secretory pattern similar to healthy subjects in both first (0-10 min) and second (10-180 min) phases after glucose challenge, in contrast to saline-treated DM2 subjects. In exenatide-treated DM2 subjects, the most common adverse event was moderate nausea (two of 13 subjects). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term exposure to exenatide can restore the insulin secretory pattern in response to acute rises in glucose concentrations in DM2 patients who, in the absence of exenatide, do not display a first phase of insulin secretion. Loss of first-phase insulin secretion in DM2 patients may be restored by treatment with exenatide.     

2型糖尿病高危人群的血管内皮功能与血浆游离脂肪酸水平

目的研究2型糖尿病（T2DM）患者、糖耐量正常的2型糖尿病一级亲属（FDRs）、糖耐量减低（IGT）人群的血管内皮功能、血浆游离脂肪酸（FFA）水平并与健康对照组进行比较。方法测定36例健康人（男16例,女20例）、57例FDRs（男27例,女30例）、59例IGT（男25例,女34例）,35例T2DM（男15例,女20例）的FFA水平、内皮依赖性血管舒张功能（EDV）以及空腹胰岛素、TC、TG、BMI、腰臀围比、空腹血糖及糖化血红蛋白,同时计算胰岛素敏感性指数（IAI）。结果FDRs、IGT及T2DM组的EDV显著低于健康对照组[FDRs组（5．03±0．34）％,IGT组（3．09±0．28）％,T2DM组（2．62±0．29）％,对照组（12．45±3．37）％];FFA水平高于对照组[FDRs组（0．52±0．08）mmol／L,IGT组（0．52±0．12）mmol／L,T2DM组（0．59±0．23）mmol／L,对照组（0．46±0．18）mmol／L];IAI低于对照组（FDRs组-4．20±0．38,IGT组-4．41±0．72,T2DM组-4．65±0．64,对照组-3．79±0．57）,差异均有统计学意义（P值均〈0．05）。结论T2DM、糖耐量正常的FDRs及IGT人群存在IAI降低、血管内皮功能受损、FFA升高。     

Metabolic and endocrine effects of physiological increments in plasma ghrelin concentrations

BACKGROUND: Growing evidence indicates that the administration of large amounts of ghrelin to humans increases circulating concentrations of several pituitary and adrenal hormones, induces hyperglycemia and reduces serum insulin concentrations. At present, it is not known whether physiological increments in plasma ghrelin concentrations affect glucose kinetics or hormone concentrations in humans. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared the effects of two- and three-fold increments in plasma ghrelin concentrations in eight healthy subjects during a 2 h intravenous infusion of 7.5 (GHRE7.5), 15 (GHRE15) pmol kg(-1) min(-1) acylated human ghrelin or placebo (PL), in a randomized double-blind study. Compared with PL (146 +/- 24 pM) plasma ghrelin concentrations increased at 120 min (p<0.001) about two-fold after GHRE7.5 (300 +/- 35 pM) and three-fold after GHRE15 (494 +/- 30 pM). GHRE15 significantly increased circulating concentrations of NEFA, GH, ACTH, epinephrine, and prolactin (p<0.01). GHRELIN7.5 significantly (p<0.01) increased only serum GH concentrations. Neither ghrelin infusions changed glucose flux or circulating concentrations of glucose, insulin, C-peptide, glucagon, IGF-1, cortisol and norepinephrine. CONCLUSIONS: GH secretion is the only response that is stimulated by physiological increments in plasma ghrelin concentrations; about three-fold increases in plasma ghrelin concentrations are required to elicit the responses of epinephrine, prolactin, ACTH and NEFA.     

Defective amplification of the late phase insulin response to glucose by GIP in obese Type II diabetic patients

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Glucagon-like-peptide-1 (GLP-1) is strongly insulinotropic in patients with Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus, whereas glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is less effective. Our investigation evaluated "early" (protocol 1) - and "late phase" (protocol 2) insulin and C-peptide responses to GLP-1 and GIP stimulation in patients with Type II diabetes. METHODS: Protocol 1: eight Type II diabetic patients and eight matched healthy subjects received i.v. bolus injections of GLP-1(2.5 nmol) or GIP(7.5 nmol) concomitant with an increase of plasma glucose to 15 mmol/l. Protocol 2: eight Type II diabetic patients underwent a hyperglycaemic clamp (15 mmol/l) with infusion (per kg body weight/min) of either: 1 pmol GLP-1 (7-36) amide (n=8), 4 pmol GIP (n=8), 16 pmol GIP (n=4) or no incretin hormone (n=5). For comparison, six matched healthy subjects were examined. RESULTS: Protocol 1: Type II diabetic patients were characterised by a decreased "early phase" response to both stimuli, but their relative response to GIP versus GLP-1 stimulation was exactly the same as in healthy subjects [insulin (C-peptide): patients 59+/-9% (74+/-6%) and healthy subjects 62+/-5% (71+/-9%)]. Protocol 2, "Early phase" (0-20 min) insulin response to glucose was delayed and reduced in the patients, but enhanced slightly and similarly by GIP and GLP-1. GLP-1 augmented the "late phase" (20-120 min) insulin secretion to levels similar to those observed in healthy subjects. In contrast, the "late phase" responses to both doses of GIP were not different from those obtained with glucose alone. Accordingly, glucose infusion rates required to maintain the hyperglycaemic clamp in the "late phase" period (20-120 min) were similar with glucose alone and glucose plus GIP, whereas a doubling of the infusion rate was required during GLP-1 stimulation. CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION: Lack of GIP amplification of the late phase insulin response to glucose, which contrasts markedly to the normalising effect of GLP-1, could be a key defect in insulin secretion in Type II diabetic patients.     

Insulin regulation of plasma free fatty acid concentrations is abnormal in healthy subjects with muscle insulin resistance

This study evaluated the ability of insulin to regulate free fatty acid (FFA) concentrations in healthy nondiabetic subjects selected to be either insulin-resistant or -sensitive on the basis of insulin-mediated glucose disposal by muscle. Comparisons of steady-state plasma glucose (SSPG), insulin (SSPI), and FFA concentrations were made at the end of 3 infusion periods: (1) under basal insulin conditions (approximately 10 microU/mL), (2) in response to isoproterenol-induced stimulation of lipolysis at the same basal insulin concentration, and (3) following inhibition of isoproterenol-induced lipolysis by a 2-fold increase in the insulin concentration. The results showed that steady-state FFA concentrations were significantly higher under basal conditions (360 +/- 73 v 158 +/- 36 microEq/L, P = .02), in response to isoproterenol-induced lipolysis (809 +/- 92 v433 +/- 65 microEq/L, P = .005), and following insulin inhibition of isoproterenol-induced lipolysis (309 +/- 65 v 159 +/- 37 microEq/L, P = .06). These differences were found despite the fact that SSPG concentrations were also higher in insulin-resistant individuals during all 3 infusion periods. These results demonstrate that the ability of insulin to regulate plasma FFA concentrations is impaired in healthy subjects with muscle insulin resistance, indicating that insulin-resistant individuals share defects in the ability of insulin to stimulate muscle glucose disposal and to inhibit adipose tissue lipolysis.     

Effects of ghrelin on the insulin and glycemic responses to glucose,arginine, or free fatty acids load in humans

Ghrelin possesses central and peripheral endocrine actions including influence on the endocrine pancreatic function. To clarify this latter ghrelin action, in seven normal young subjects [age (mean +/- SEM), 28.3 +/- 3.1 yr; body mass index, 21.9 +/- 0.9 kg/m(2)), we studied insulin and glucose levels after acute ghrelin administration (1.0 microg/kg i.v.) alone or combined with glucose [oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), 100 g orally], arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg i.v.) or free fatty acid (FFA, Intralipid 10%, 250 ml). Ghrelin inhibited (P < 0.05) insulin and increased (P < 0.05) glucose levels. OGTT increased (P < 0.01) glucose and insulin levels. FFA increased (P < 0.05) glucose but did not modify insulin levels. ARG increased (P < 0.05) both insulin and glucose levels. Ghrelin did not modify both glucose and insulin responses to OGTT as well as the FFA-induced increase in glucose levels; however, ghrelin administration was followed by transient insulin decrease also during FFA. Ghrelin blunted (P < 0.05) the insulin response to ARG and enhanced (P < 0.05) the ARG-induced increase in glucose levels. In all, ghrelin induces transient decrease of spontaneous insulin secretion and selectively blunts the insulin response to ARG but not to oral glucose load. On the other hand, ghrelin raises basal glucose levels and enhances the hyperglycemic effect of ARG but not that of OGTT. These findings support the hypothesis that ghrelin exerts modulatory action of insulin secretion and glucose metabolism in humans.     

Evaluation of pancreatic exocrine function using pure pancreatic juice in noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

To investigate the pancreatic exocrine function in noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (type 2 DM), we evaluated the pure pancreatic juice obtained by endoscopic cannulation of the main pancreatic duct in 13 healthy control subjects and 22 patients with type 2 DM who had no evidence of pancreatic disease. Samples of pancreatic juices were collected in six fractions for 30 minutes at 5-minute intervals after an intravenous bolus injection of secretin (0.25 CU/kg) and cholecystokinin-8 (CCK) (40 ng/kg). The responses of plasma glucose, insulin, and C-peptide to intravenous administration of glucose (50%, 40 mL) were measured. The levels of plasma insulin and C-peptide levels in type 2 DM were the same as in healthy controls in the basal state but did not further increase in response to an intravenous glucose. This suggested that patients with type 2 DM had insulin secretion defect rather than insulin deficiency. Pancreatic secretions including volume, bicarbonate, and protein output in response to stimulation with secretin, and CCK were significantly reduced when compared to the healthy controls. We conclude that patients with type 2 DM exhibit impairment of pancreatic exocrine secretion and that this impairment might not be related to insulin deficiency. Therefore, we recommended that careful evaluation for exocrine pancreatic function in type 2 diabetics who have any clinically suspicious symptoms of pancreatic insufficiency.     

Glucose metabolism in lean patients with mild type 2 diabetes mellitus: evidence for insulin-sensitive and insulin-resistant variants

Obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) are 2 closely related syndromes, with obesity occurring in 70% to 80% of DM2 patients. Both syndromes are characterized by insulin resistance (IR). However, the metabolic characteristics of lean DM2 patients are not clearly defined, a fact attributed to the heterogeneity of the diabetes syndrome. Our objective was to study glucose metabolism in lean DM2 patients, in terms both of the basal and the insulin-stimulated states, and particularly, to investigate whether 2 subpopulations of diabetic patients are identifiable on the basis of degree of IR. Sixteen nonobese (body mass index [BMI] less than 27 kg. m(-2)) DM2 subjects with light to moderate fasting hyperglycemia were studied. Ten healthy subjects were used as a control group, with no family history of DM2 and matched by age, sex, and BMI in the diabetic group. All participants underwent an intravenous glucose tolerance test with frequent sampling over 180 minutes. Insulin sensitivity (IS) and glucose effectiveness at zero insulin (GEZI) were calculated using Bergman's minimal model. Non-insulin-mediated glucose uptakes (NIMGU) and insulin-mediated glucose uptakes (IMGU) were calculated for the basal (F) and insulin-stimulated states at 11.1 mmol/L of glucose (11.1). The beta-cell function was calculated via the acute insulin response to glucose (AIRg). Clustering techniques were used to identify subpopulations of DM2 patients on the basis of insulin sensitivity. The group of DM2 patients was characterized by both IR (IS index, 6.23 +/- 4.68 v 12.75 +/- 7.74 x 10(-5). min(-1). (pmol. L(-1))(-1), P <.01) and insulin secretion abnormalities (AIRg, 336 +/- 456 v 1,912 +/- 1,293 pmol/L. min, P <.0001), but showed similar values for GEZI (0.011 +/- 0.005 v 0.011 +/- 0.007 min(-1), not significant [NS]) in comparison to the control group. For the basal state, no differences were found between the DM2 patients and control subjects for NIMGU(F) (0.13 +/- 0.07 v 0.08 +/- 0.05 mmol/kg. min, NS) or for IMGU(F) (0.05 +/- 0.04 v 0.05 +/- 0.02 mmol/kg. min, NS). For the insulin-stimulated state, the DM2 patients showed a reduction of approximately 50% in the IMGU(11.1) value (0.20 +/- 0.17 v 0.38 +/- 0.24 mmol/kg. min, P <.05), but no significant differences were found for NIMGU(11.1) (0.19 +/- 0.09 v 0.20 +/- 0.12 mmol/kg. min, NS) in relation to the control group. Using the clustering technique, it was possible to identify 2 subpopulations of DM2 patients, a DM-IS group (n = 6) that was insulin sensitive (IS index, 11.70 +/- 2.40 x 10(-5). min(-1). (pmol. L(-1))(-1)) and a DM-IR group (n = 10) that was insulin resistant (IS index, 3.02 +/- 1.60 x 10(-5). min(-1). (pmol. L(-1))(-1)). The DM-IS group was characterized by an absence of IR, diminished GEZI, and a reduction in AIRg; whereas the DM-IR group was characterized by IR and a reduction in AIRg, but normal GEZI. We conclude that (1) as a group, DM2 patients are characterized by IR and beta-cell dysfunction, but normal NIMGU; (2) two subpopulations of DM2 patients can be identified on the basis of insulin sensitivity, with the DM-IS group further characterized by diminished GEZI; and finally, (3) deterioration in the pancreatic response to glucose stimulus is a sine qua non condition for a profound alteration in glucose metabolism in DM2 patients.     

Exercise-induced improvement in vasodilatory function accompanies increased insulin sensitivity in obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE: The present study was undertaken to determine whether improved vasodilatory function accompanies increased insulin sensitivity in overweight, insulin-resistant subjects (OW) and type 2 diabetic patients (T2DM) who participated in an 8-wk exercise training regimen. DESIGN: Before and after training, subjects had euglycemic clamps to determine insulin sensitivity. Brachial artery catheterization was done on another occasion for measurement of vasodilatory function. A lean, healthy, untrained group was studied as nonexercised controls. RESULTS: Training increased oxygen consumption (VO2) peak [OW, 29 +/- 1 to 37 +/- 4 ml/kg fat-free mass (FFM).min; T2DM, 33 +/- 2 to 43 +/- 3 ml/kg FFM.min; P < 0.05] and improved insulin-stimulated glucose disposal (OW, 6.5 +/- 0.5 to 7.2 +/- 0.4 mg/kg FFM.min; T2DM, 3.8 +/- 0.3 to 4.2 +/- 0.3 mg/kg FFM.min; P < 0.05) in insulin resistance. OW and T2DM, before training, had decreased acetylcholine chloride (ACh)- and sodium nitroprusside-mediated vasodilation and decreased reactive hyperemia compared with lean controls. Training increased the vasodilatory response to ACh [OW (30 microg ACh/min), 12.2 +/- 3.4 to 19 +/- 4.2 ml/100 g.min; T2DM (30 microg ACh/min), 10.1 +/- 1.5 to 14.2 +/- 2.1 ml/100 g.min; P < 0.05] in both groups without affecting nitroprusside response. CONCLUSION: Because vasodilatory dysfunction has been postulated to contribute to insulin resistance, the exercise-induced improvement in vasodilatory function may signify changes in the endothelium that could contribute to the improvement in insulin sensitivity observed after aerobic exercise training.     

Insulin secretion predicts the response to therapy with exenatide plus pioglitazone,but not to basal/bolus insulin in poorly controlled T2DM patients: Results from the Qatar study

The present study aims to identify predictors for response to combination therapy with pioglitazone plus exenatide vs basal/bolus insulin therapy in T2DM patients who are poorly controlled with maximum/near‐maximum doses of metformin plus a sulfonylurea. Participants in the Qatar study received a 75‐g OGTT with measurement of plasma glucose, insulin and C‐peptide concentration at baseline and were then randomized to receive either treatment with pioglitazone plus exenatide or basal/bolus insulin therapy for one year. Insulin secretion measured with plasma C‐peptide concentration during the OGTT was the strongest predictor of response to combination therapy (HbA1c ≤ 7.0%) with pioglitazone plus exenatide. A 54% increase in 2‐hour plasma C‐peptide concentration above the fasting level identified subjects who achieved the glycaemic goal (HbA1c < 7.0%) with 82% sensitivity and 79% specificity. Only baseline HbA1c was a predictor of response to basal/bolus insulin therapy. Thus, the increment in 2‐hour plasma C‐peptide concentration above the fasting level provides a useful tool to identify poorly controlled T2DM patients who can achieve glycaemic control without insulin therapy, and thereby, can be used to individualize antihyperglycaemic therapy in poorly controlled T2DM patients.     

Insulin regulates plasma ghrelin concentration

Ghrelin is a novel gastric peptide which stimulates growth hormone and has orexigenic and adipogenic properties. Plasma ghrelin is influenced by nutritional status and is thought to play a role in regulating food intake and body weight. We examined the effect of infusing insulin (40 mU/m(2)/min) for 2 hours while maintaining euglycemia on plasma ghrelin in 8 subjects (5 M, 3 F) aged 46 +/- 4 yrs (mean +/- SEM). Plasma insulin increased from 78 +/- 9 to 564 +/- 23 pmol/L during and returned rapidly to basal values after stopping the insulin infusion. Plasma ghrelin decreased from 85 +/- 28 to 61 +/- 18 pmol/L (p < 0.01) by 90 minutes of and continued to be suppressed for 15 minutes after the insulin infusion was discontinued. Subsequently, plasma ghrelin rose rapidly to near-basal values (81 +/- 23 pmol/L) within 60 minutes. The reciprocal relation between insulin and ghrelin was observed consistently in all subjects with the maximum insulin-induced suppression of ghrelin ranging from 19 to 64% (mean 32 +/- 5) and occurring 90-135 minutes after starting the insulin infusion (median 120). These findings indicate that insulin is a physiological and dynamic modulator of plasma ghrelin and that insulinemia possibly mediates the effect of nutritional status on its concentration.     

Acetylcholine does not play a major role in mediating the endocrine responses to ghrelin,a natural ligand of the GH secretagogue receptor,in humans

OBJECTIVE: Ghrelin is a 28 amino residue peptide produced predominantly by the stomach with substantially lower amounts deriving from other central and peripheral tissues. Ghrelin is a natural ligand of the GH secretagogue (GHS) receptor (GHS-R) and possesses a potent GH-releasing activity for which the acylation in serine 3 is essential. Ghrelin also possesses other endocrine and non-endocrine activities reflecting central and peripheral GHS-R distribution and stimulates PRL, ACTH and cortisol secretion, has been reported able to induce hyperglycaemia and to decrease insulin levels and has orexigenic activity. Moreover, ghrelin stimulates gastric motility and acid secretion and its action is mediated by acetylcholine which, in turn, is known to play a stimulatory influence on GH, ACTH and insulin secretion. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In order to clarify the influence, if any, of acetylcholine on the endocrine activities of ghrelin, we studied the effects of cholinergic enhancement by pyridostigmine (PD, 120 mg p.o. at -60 minutes) and blockade by pirenzepine (PIR, 100 mg p.o. at -60 minutes) on GH, PRL, cortisol, insulin and glucose responses to human acylated ghrelin (1.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 minutes) in seven normal young volunteers [age (mean +/- SEM): 28.3 +/- 3.1 years; BMI: 21.9 +/- 0.9 kg/m2]. In the same subjects, the effects of PD and PIR on the GH response to GHRH (1.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 minutes) have also been studied. RESULTS: The administration of ghrelin induced a prompt increase in circulating GH levels (hAUC: 5452.4 +/- 904.9 microg*min/L) which was markedly higher (P < 0.01) than that elicited by GHRH (966.9 +/- 20.50 microg*min/L). Ghrelin also induced a significant increase in PRL (1273.5 +/- 199.7 microg*min/L) and cortisol levels (15505.1 +/- 796.3 microg*min/L) and a decrease in insulin levels (Delta hAUC: -198.1 +/- 39.2 mU*min/L) which was preceded by an increase in plasma glucose levels (8743.8 +/- 593.0 mg*min/dL). The GH response to GHRH was markedly potentiated by PD (4363.3 +/- 917.3 microg*min/L; P < 0.01 vs. GHRH alone). In turn, PD did not modify either the GH response to ghrelin (6564.2 +/- 1753.5 microg*min/L) or its stimulatory effect on PRL and cortisol as well as its effects on insulin and glucose levels. The GH response to GHRH was inhibited by PIR (171.5 +/- 34.7 microg*min/L, P < 0.01 vs. GHRH alone) which, in turn, did not significantly modify the GH response to ghrelin (4044.0 +/- 948.8 microg*min/L). PIR also did not modify the effects of ghrelin on PRL, cortisol, insulin and glucose levels. CONCLUSIONS: The endocrine activities of ghrelin are not affected significantly by cholinergic enhancement and muscarinic blockade. Thus, acetylcholine does not play a major role in the endocrine actions of ghrelin. Moreover, as the cholinergic system influences GH secretion via modulation of somatostatin release, the present data agree with the assumption that ghrelin is partially refractory to the influence of somatostatin.     

Effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery on fasting and postprandial concentrations of plasma ghrelin, peptide YY, and insulin

To help understand the mechanisms by which weight loss is maintained after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP), we measured circulating concentrations of total and bioactive octanoylated ghrelin, peptide YY (PYY), glucose, and insulin in the fasted state and in response to a liquid test meal in three groups of adult women: lean (n = 8); weight-stable 35 +/- 5 months after RYGBP (n = 12; mean body mass index, 33 kg/m(2)); and matched to the surgical group for body mass index and age (n = 12). Fasting plasma total ghrelin levels were nearly identical between RYGBP (425 +/- 54 pg/ml) and the matched controls (424 +/- 28 pg/ml) and highest in lean controls (564 +/- 103 pg/ml). The response to the test meal was comparable between lean and RYGBP groups, with 27% and 20% maximal suppression, respectively, whereas the magnitude of suppression was significantly diminished in the matched controls (17%) compared with the lean group. Fasting levels of octanoylated ghrelin were highest in the lean controls, 220 +/- 36 pg/ml vs. 143 +/- 27 in the RYGBP group (P = 0.05) and 127 +/- 12 pg/ml in the matched controls (P < 0.05). The magnitude of maximal postmeal suppression of octanoylated ghrelin was more marked than with total ghrelin, but similar among groups, ranging from 44-47%. In response to the test meal, there was an early exaggerated rise in PYY in the RYGBP group, such that the peak PYY concentration was 163 +/- 24 pg/ml compared with 58 +/- 17 (P < 0.01) and 77 +/- 23 (P < 0.05) in the matched and lean controls, respectively; area under the curve at 90 min was significantly greater compared with both control groups. Leptin and fasting insulin concentrations and homeostasis model of assessment insulin resistance indices were nearly identical between lean and RYGBP subjects and significantly higher in the body mass index-matched controls. In summary, the absence of a compensatory increase in ghrelin concentrations that usually occurs with diet-induced weight loss, and the exaggerated postprandial PYY response after RYGBP, may contribute to weight loss and to the ability of an individual to maintain weight loss after this surgical procedure.     

Infusion of synthetic human C-peptide does not affect plasma glucose, serum insulin, or plasma glucagon in healthy subjects

We studied six healthy male subjects to determine whether a four-hour infusion of synthetic human C-peptide sufficient to achieve mean (+/- SD) peripheral plasma concentrations of 1.3 +/- 0.7 pmol/mL affected plasma glucose, serum insulin, or plasma glucagon. Subjects were studied in a fasting state and following an oral glucose load during four-hour 0.9% NaCl (control) and C-peptide (mean dose: 70 nmol) infusions. No differences were observed between saline and C-peptide infusions for mean values of fasting plasma glucose (94 +/- 6 v 87 +/- 5 mg/dL), serum insulin (3 +/- 1 v 2 +/- 1 microU/mL), or plasma glucagon (124 +/- 65 v 112 +/- 70 pg/dL). Following oral glucose ingestion no differences were detected between saline and C-peptide infusions for mean peak values of plasma glucose (168 +/- 18 v 168 +/- 31) and serum insulin (59 +/- 6 v 57 +/- 21) or mean nadir values of plasma glucagon (80 +/- 73 v 75 +/- 70). There was a slight delay in the insulin rise following oral glucose on the C-peptide infusion day, but differences between mean values for individual sampling times were not statistically significantly different.