Benzoxazole/benzothiazole‐derived VEGFR‐2 inhibitors: Design,synthesis, molecular docking,and anticancer evaluations

A novel series of benzoxazole/benzothiazole derivatives 4a–c – 11a–e were designed, synthesized, and evaluated for anticancer activity against HepG2, HCT‐116, and MCF‐7 cells. HCT‐116 was the most sensitive cell line to the influence of the new derivatives. In particular, compound 4c was found to be the most potent derivative against HepG2, HCT‐116, and MCF‐7 cells, with IC₅₀ values = 9.45 ± 0.8, 5.76 ± 0.4, and 7.36 ± 0.5 µM, respectively. Compounds 4b, 9f , and 9c showed the highest anticancer activities against HepG2 cells with IC₅₀ values of 9.97 ± 0.8, 9.99 ± 0.8, and 11.02 ± 1.0 µM, respectively, HCT‐116 cells with IC₅₀ values of 6.99 ± 0.5, 7.44 ± 0.4, and 8.15 ± 0.8 µM, respectively, and MCF‐7 cells with IC₅₀ values of 7.89 ± 0.7, 8.24 ± 0.7, and 9.32 ± 0.7 µM, respectively, in comparison with sorafenib as reference drug with IC₅₀ values of 9.18 ± 0.6, 5.47 ± 0.3, and 7.26 ± 0.3 µM, respectively. The most active compounds 4a–c, 9b,c,e,f,h , and 11c,e were further evaluated for their VEGFR‐2 inhibition. Compounds 4c and 4b potently inhibited VEGFR‐2 at IC₅₀ values of 0.12 ± 0.01 and 0.13 ± 0.02 µM, respectively, which are nearly equipotent to the sorafenib IC₅₀ value (0.10 ± 0.02 µM). Furthermore, molecular docking studies were performed for all synthesized compounds to assess their binding pattern and affinity toward the VEGFR‐2 active site.     

Design,synthesis, molecular docking,and anticancer activity of benzoxazole derivatives as VEGFR‐2 inhibitors

Novel series of benzoxazole s 4 _a‐f ‐16 were designed, synthesized, and evaluated for anticancer activity against HepG2, HCT‐116, and MCF‐7 cells. HCT‐116 was the most sensitive cell line to the influence of the new derivatives. In particular, compound 5 _e was found to be the most potent against HepG2, HCT‐116, and MCF‐7 with IC₅₀ = 4.13 ± 0.2, 6.93 ± 0.3, and 8.67 ± 0.5 µM, respectively. Compounds 5 _c , 5 _f , 6 _b , 5 _d , and 6 _c showed the highest anticancer activities against HepG2 cells with IC₅₀ of 5.93 ± 0.2, 6.58 ± 0.4, 8.10 ± 0.7, 8.75 ± 0.7, and 9.95 ± 0.9 µM, respectively; HCT‐116 cells with IC₅₀ of 7.14 ± 0.4, 9.10 ± 0.8, 7.91 ± 0.6, 9.52 ± 0.5, and 12.48 ± 1.1 µM, respectively; and MCF‐7 cells with IC₅₀ of 8.93 ± 0.6, 10.11 ± 0.9, 12.31 ± 1.0, 9.95 ± 0.8, and 15.70 ± 1.4 µM, respectively, compared with sorafenib as a reference drug with IC₅₀ of 9.18 ± 0.6, 5.47 ± 0.3, and 7.26 ± 0.3 µM, respectively. The most active compounds 5 _c‐f and 6 _b,c were further evaluated for their vascular endothelial growth factor receptor‐2 (VEGFR‐2) inhibition. Compounds 5 _e and 5 _c potently inhibited VEGFR‐2 at lower IC₅₀ values of 0.07 ± 0.01 and 0.08 ± 0.01 µM, respectively, compared with sorafenib (IC₅₀ = 0.1 ± 0.02 µM). Compound 5 _f potently inhibited VEGFR‐2 at low IC₅₀ value (0.10 ± 0.02 µM) equipotent to sorafenib. Our design was based on the essential pharmacophoric features of the VEGFR‐2 inhibitor sorafenib. Molecular docking was performed for all compounds to assess their binding pattern and affinity toward the VEGFR‐2 active site.     

Discovery and antiproliferative evaluation of new quinoxalines as potential DNA intercalators and topoisomerase II inhibitors

In continuation of our previous work on the design and synthesis of topoisomerase II (Topo II) inhibitors and DNA intercalators, a new series of quinoxaline derivatives were designed and synthesized. The synthesized compounds were evaluated for their cytotoxic activities against a panel of three cancer cell lines (Hep G‐2, Hep‐2, and Caco‐2). Compounds 18b, 19b, 23, 25b , and 26 showed strong potencies against all tested cell lines with IC₅₀ values ranging from 0.26 ± 0.1 to 2.91 ± 0.1 µM, comparable with those of doxorubicin (IC₅₀ values ranging from 0.65 ± 0.1 to 0.81 ± 0.1 µM). The most active compounds were further evaluated for their Topo II inhibitory activities and DNA intercalating affinities. Compounds 19b and 19c exhibited high activities against Topo II (IC₅₀ = 0.97 ± 0.1 and 1.10 ± 0.1 µM, respectively) and bound the DNA at concentrations of 43.51 ± 2.0 and 49.11 ± 1.8 µM, respectively, whereas compound 28b exhibited a significant affinity to bind the DNA with an IC₅₀ value of 37.06 ± 1.8 µM. Moreover, apoptosis and cell‐cycle tests of the most promising compound 19b were carried out. It was found that 19b can significantly induce apoptosis in Hep G‐2 cells. It has revealed cell‐cycle arrest at the G2/M phase. Moreover, compound 19b downregulated the Bcl‐2 levels, indicating its potential to enhance apoptosis. Furthermore, molecular docking studies were carried out against the DNA–Topo II complex to examine the binding patterns of the synthesized compounds.     

The application of tandem aza-wittig reaction to synthesize artemisinin-guanidine hybrids and their anti-tumor activity

Three series of novel artemisinin–guanidine hybrids 4a–4f , 8a–8h and 9a–9h have been facilely synthesized via four‐component reaction (aza‐Wittig reaction) and evaluated for their anti‐tumor activities against A549, HT‐29 and MDA‐MB‐231 cell lines in vitro. All of the tested compounds showed enhanced anti‐tumor activities with IC₅₀ values ranging from 0.02 µM to 12.0 µM as compared to DHA (dihydroartemisinin). Among them, artemisinin derived dimers, compounds 9b (IC₅₀ = 0.05 µM), 9d (IC₅₀ = 0.06 µM) and 9f (IC₅₀ = 0.02 µM) were found to be most active against HT29 cells.     

Design,synthesis, and molecular docking study of 3H‐imidazole[4,5‐c]pyridine derivatives as CDK2 inhibitors

A novel series of imidazo[4,5‐c]pyridine‐based CDK2 inhibitors were designed from the structure of CYC202 via scaffold hopping strategy. These compounds were synthesized and biologically evaluated for their CDK2 inhibitory and in vitro anti‐proliferation potential against cancer cell lines. Several compounds exhibited potent CDK2 inhibition with IC₅₀ values of less than 1 µM. The most potent compound 5b showed excellent CDK2 inhibitory (IC₅₀ = 21 nM) and in vitro anti‐proliferation activity against three different cell lines (HL60, A549, and HCT116). The molecular docking and dynamic studies portrayed the potential binding mechanism between 5b and CDK2, and several key interactions between them were observed, which would be the reason for its potent CDK2 inhibitory and anti‐proliferation activities. Therefore, the pyridin‐3‐ylmethyl moiety would serve as an excellent pharmacophore for the development of novel CDK2 inhibitors for targeted anti‐cancer therapy.

     

Synthesis and biological evaluation of some pyrazole derivatives as anti-malarial agents

Novel series of pyrazole derivatives were synthesized and tested for their in vivo anti‐malarial activity using mice infected with chloroquine sensitive P. berghei at a dose level of 50 µmol/kg. The most active compounds were further tested in vitro against chloroquine resistant (RKL9) strain of P. falciparum. The in vivo anti‐malarial activity study indicated that compounds 2a, 2b, 8a and 8b had mean percent suppression of 85%, 83%, 95% and 97%, respectively at equimolar dose level of the standard drug chloroquine diphosphate. Moreover, compounds 2a, 2b, 8a and 8b showed in vitro IC₅₀ values lower (p < 0.05) than that of the standard drug chloroquine phosphate (0.188 ± 0.003 µM) using the RKL9 strain. Compound 8b was the most active with IC₅₀ of 0.033 ± 0.014 µM. Generally, among the tested compounds, those containing a free carboxylic acid functional group on the pyrazole ring were the most active and this finding was supported by the docking results performed for the active compounds. The acute toxicity studies of the active compounds revealed that they have a good safety profile.     

Synthesis and biological activities of 2-amino-thiazole-5-carboxylic acid phenylamide derivatives

In an attempt to develop potent and selective anti‐tumor drugs, a series of novel 2‐amino‐thiazole‐5‐carboxylic acid phenylamide derivatives were designed based on the structure of dasatinib. All compounds were synthesized by a systematic combinatorial chemical approach. Biological evaluation revealed that N‐(2‐chloro‐6‐methylphenyl)‐2‐(2‐(4‐methylpiperazin‐1‐yl)acetamido)thiazole‐5‐carboxamide ( 6d ) exhibited high antiproliferative potency on human K563 leukemia cells comparable to dasatinib. Against mammary and colon carcinoma cells 6d was either inactive (MDA‐MB 231) or distinctly less active (MCF‐7 and HT‐29: IC₅₀ = 20.2 and 21.6 µM, respectively). Dasatinib showed at each cell line IC₅₀ < 1 µM. The results of this structure activity relationship study clearly documented that the pyrimidin‐4‐ylamino core of dasatinib is responsible for the anti‐tumor activity against non‐leukemia cell lines.     

Design and synthesis of 2‐phenyl benzimidazole derivatives as VEGFR‐2 inhibitors with anti‐breast cancer activity

Three new series of 2‐phenyl benzimidazole‐based derivatives were designed, synthesized, and evaluated for their in vitro cytotoxic activity against breast cancer (MCF‐7) cell lines. Three compounds 8 , 9 , and 15 showed high cytotoxic activities, with IC₅₀ values of 3.37, 6.30, and 5.84 μM, respectively, while they showed comparable cytotoxicity to the standard drug doxorubicin against human normal cells, including nontumorigenic breast epithelial cell line (MCF‐10F), skin fibroblast cell line (BJ), and lung fibroblast cell line (MRC‐5). Six of the synthesized compounds were screened against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR‐2) where compounds 8 , 9 , 12 , and 15 exhibited an outstanding potency in comparison with sorafenib, with IC₅₀ values of 6.7–8.9 nM. Molecular docking study assessed the good binding patterns of the most potent compounds with the reported conserved amino acids of VEGFR‐2 active site.     

Novel Pyrazole and Indazole Derivatives: Synthesis and Evaluation of Their Anti‐Proliferative and Anti‐Angiogenic Activities

The synthesis of several new pyrazole and indazole derivatives from acetophenone and tetralone substrates is reported. The bioactivities of the new compounds were evaluated through in vitro assays for endothelial cell proliferation and tube formation. Results herein indicate that the easily prepared compounds containing the indazole structural framework exhibit potent cytostatic properties against all cell lines tested, with compounds 13 and 14 being the most active displaying IC₅₀ values of 1.5 ± 0.4 µM and 5.6 ± 2.5 µM, respectively, against MCF‐7 cells. In addition, the indazole derivative 16 was assessed as a competent inhibitor of endothelial tube formation at 30 µM.     

Design,synthesis, and antitumor evaluation of quinoline‐imidazole derivatives

A series of compounds bearing quinoline‐imidazole ( 8a–e , 9a–e , 10a–e , 11a–e , and 12a–e ) not reported previously were designed and synthesized. The target compounds were evaluated for antitumor activity against A549, PC‐3, HepG2, and MCF‐7 cells by the MTT method, with NVP‐BEZ235 being the positive control. Most compounds showed moderate activity and compound 12a showed the best activity against HepG2, A549, and PC‐3 cells, with half‐maximal inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) values of 2.42 ± 1.02 µM, 6.29 ± 0.99 µM, and 5.11 ± 1.00 µM, respectively, which was equal to NVP‐BEZ235 (0.54 ± 0.13 µM, 0.36 ± 0.06 µM, 0.20 ± 0.01 µM). Besides, the IC₅₀ value of 12a against the cell line WI‐38 (human fetal lung fibroblasts) was 32.8 ± 1.23 µM, indicating that the target compounds were selective for cancer cells. So, 11a and 12a were evaluated against PI3Kα and mTOR to find out if the compounds acted through the PI3K‐Akt‐mTOR signal transduction pathway. The inhibition ratios to PI3Kα and mTOR were slightly lower than that of NVP‐BEZ235, suggesting there may be some other mechanisms of action. The structure–activity relationships and docking study of 11a and 12a revealed that the latter was superior. Moreover, the target compounds showed better in vitro anticancer activity when the C‐6 of the quinoline ring was replaced by a bromine atom.

     

Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Novel 6‐Hydrazinyl‐2,4‐bismorpholino pyrimidine and 1,3,5‐Triazine Derivatives as Potential Antitumor Agents

A series of 6‐hydrazinyl‐2,4‐bismorpholino pyrimidine and 1,3,5‐triazine derivatives ( 5a – 5l and 8a – 8o ) were synthesized and their chemical structures as well as the relative stereochemistry were confirmed. All the synthesized compounds were evaluated for antiproliferative activity against three cancer cell lines (H460, HT‐29, and MDA‐MB‐231). Several potent compounds were further evaluated against two other cell lines (U87MG, H1975). Most of the prepared compounds, particularly compounds 5c and 5j with IC₅₀ values (0.07 and 0.05 µM, respectively) in the nM range, exhibited moderate to excellent antiproliferative activity and high selectivity against the H460 cancer cell line as compared with compound 1 . The most promising compound 5j , possessing a cyano group at the 3‐position of the benzene ring, showed strong antiproliferative activity against H460, HT‐29, and MDA‐MB‐231 cell lines with IC₅₀ values of 0.05, 6.31, and 6.50 µM, which were 4.6‐ to 190.4‐fold more active than compound 1 (9.52, 29.24, and 36.21 µM), respectively.     

Synthesis and cytotoxic evaluation of some new phthalazinylpiperazine derivatives

A new series of 1,4‐disubstituted phthalazinylpiperazine derivatives 7a–f , 12a–f and 20a–f were designed and synthesized in order to develop potent and selective antitumor agents. The target compounds were screened for their cytotoxic activities against A549, HT‐29 and MDA‐MB‐231 cancer cell lines in vitro. Among them, compounds 7a–f exhibited excellent selectivity for MDA‐MB‐231 with IC₅₀ values ranging from 0.013 µM to 0.079 µM. The most promising compound, 7e (IC₅₀ = 2.19 µM, 2.19 µM, 0.013 µM), was 9.3, 10, and 4.9 × 10³ times more active than vatalanib (IC₅₀ = 20.27 µM, 21.96 µM, 63.90 µM), respectively.     

Design,synthesis, docking,and anticancer evaluations of phthalazines as VEGFR-2 inhibitors

Twenty new N-substituted-4-phenylphthalazin-1-amine derivatives were designed, synthesized, and evaluated for their anticancer activities against HepG2, HCT-116, and MCF-7 cells as VEGFR-2 inhibitors. HCT-116 was the most sensitive cell line to the influence of the new derivatives. In particular, compound 7f was found to be the most potent derivative among all the tested compounds against the three cancer cell lines, with 50% inhibition concentration, IC₅₀ = 3.97, 4.83, and 4.58 µM, respectively, which is more potent than both sorafenib (IC₅₀ = 9.18, 5.47, and 7.26 µM, respectively) and doxorubicin (IC₅₀ = 7.94, 8.07, and 6.75 µM, respectively). Fifteen of the synthesized derivatives were selected to evaluate their inhibitory activities against VEGFR-2. Compound 7f was found to be the most potent derivative that inhibited VEGFR-2 at an IC₅₀ value of 0.08 µM, which is more potent than sorafenib (IC₅₀ = 0.10 µM). Compound 8c inhibited VEGFR-2 at an IC₅₀ value of 0.10 µM, which is equipotent to sorafenib. Moreover, compound 7a showed very good activity with IC₅₀ values of 0.11 µM, which is nearly equipotent to sorafenib. In addition, compounds 7d , 7c , and 7g possessed very good VEGFR-2-inhibitory activity, with IC₅₀ values of 0.14, 0.17, and 0.23 µM, respectively.     

Design,synthesis, and docking study of new quinoline derivatives as antitumor agents

New quinolines substituted with various heterocycles and chalcone moieties were synthesized and evaluated as antitumor agents. All the synthesized compounds were in vitro screened against 60 human cancer cell lines. Compound 13 showed the highest cytotoxicity toward 58 cell lines, exhibiting distinct growth inhibition values (GI₅₀) against the majority of them, including SR, HL‐60 (TB) strains (leukemia), and MDA‐MB‐435 strains (melanoma), with GI₅₀ values of 0.232, 0.260, and 0.300 µM, respectively. It exhibited great selectivity toward cancer cell lines, with less toxic effect against normal cells represented by skin fibroblast (BJ) and breast epithelial cell lines (MCF‐10F). The enzyme inhibitory activity of compound 13 was evaluated against topoisomerase 1 (Topo 1), epidermal growth factor receptor and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, where it displayed worthy Topo 1 inhibition activity with an IC₅₀ value of 0.278 µM compared with camptothecin as a reference drug (IC₅₀ 0.224 µM). Docking studies were performed to investigate the recognition profile of compound 13 with the Topo 1 enzyme binding site.     

Design,synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel 1,2‐diaryl‐4‐substituted‐benzylidene‐5(4H)‐imidazolone derivatives as cytotoxic agents and COX‐2/LOX inhibitors

A new series of 1,2‐diaryl‐4‐substituted‐benzylidene‐5(4H)‐imidazolone derivatives 4a–l was synthesized. Their structures were confirmed by different spectroscopic techniques (IR, ¹H NMR, DEPT‐Q NMR, and mass spectroscopy) and elemental analyses. Their cytotoxic activities in vitro were evaluated against breast, ovarian, and liver cancer cell lines and also normal human skin fibroblasts. Cyclooxygenase (COX)‐1, COX‐2 and lipoxygenase (LOX) inhibitory activities were measured. The synthesized compounds showed selectivity toward COX‐2 rather than COX‐1, and the IC₅₀ values (0.25–1.7 µM) were lower than that of indomethacin (IC₅₀ = 9.47 µM) and somewhat higher than that of celecoxib (IC₅₀ = 0.071 µM). The selectivity index for COX‐2 of the oxazole derivative 4e (SI = 3.67) was nearly equal to that of celecoxib (SI = 3.66). For the LOX inhibitory activity, the new compounds showed IC₅₀ values of 0.02–74.03 µM, while the IC₅₀ of the reference zileuton was 0.83 µM. The most active compound 4c (4‐chlorobenzoxazole derivative) was found to have dual COX‐2/LOX activity. All the synthesized compounds were docked inside the active site of the COX‐2 and LOX enzymes. They linked to COX‐2 through the N atom of the azole scaffold, while C?O of the oxazolone moiety was responsible for the binding to amino acids inside the LOX active site.

     

One‐Pot Laccase‐Catalysed Synthesis of 5,6‐Dihydroxylated Benzo[b]furans and Catechol Derivatives,and Their Anticancer Activity

A commercial laccase, Suberase® from Novozymes, was used to catalyse the synthesis of 5,6‐dihydroxylated benzo[b]furans and catechol derivatives. The yields were, in some cases, similar to or better than that obtained by other enzymatic, chemical or electrochemical syntheses. The synthesised derivatives were screened against renal (TK10), melanoma (UACC62), breast (MCF7) and cervical (HeLa) cancer cell lines. GI₅₀, TGI and LC₅₀ are reported for the first time. Anticancer screening showed that the cytostatic effects of the 5,6‐dihydroxylated benzo[b]furans were most effective against the melanoma (UACC62) cancer cell line with several compounds exhibiting potent growth inhibitory activities (GI₅₀ = 0.77–9.76 µM), of which two compounds had better activity than the anticancer agent etoposide (GI₅₀ = 0.89 µM). One compound exhibited potent activity (GI₅₀ = 9.73 µM) against the renal (TK10) cancer cell line and two exhibited potent activity (GI₅₀ = 8.79 and 9.30 µM) against the breast (MCF7) cancer cell line. These results encourage further studies of the 5,6‐dihydroxylated benzo[b]furans for their potential application in anticancer therapy.     

Design and synthesis of pyrazole–pyrazoline hybrids as cancer‐associated selective COX‐2 inhibitors

In continuation of our previous work on cancer and inflammation, 15 novel pyrazole–pyrazoline hybrids ( WSPP1 – 15 ) were synthesized and fully characterized. The formation of the pyrazoline ring was confirmed by the appearance of three doublets of doublets in ¹H nuclear magnetic resonance spectra exhibiting an AMX pattern for three protons (H_A, H_M, and H_X) of the pyrazoline ring. All the synthesized compounds were screened for their in vitro anticancer activity against five cell lines, that is, MCF‐7, A549, SiHa, COLO205, and HepG2 cells, using the MTT growth inhibition assay. 5‐Fluorouracil was taken as the positive control in the study. It was observed that, among them, WSPP11 was found to be active against A549, SiHa, COLO205, and HepG2 cells, with IC₅₀ values of 4.94, 4.54, 4.86, and 2.09 µM. All the derivatives were also evaluated for their cytotoxicity against HaCaT cells. WSPP11 was also found to be nontoxic against normal cells (cell line HaCaT), with an IC₅₀ value of more than 50 µM. The derivatives were also evaluated for their in vitro anti‐inflammatory activity by the protein (egg albumin) denaturation assay and the red blood cell membrane stabilizing assay, using diclofenac sodium and celecoxib as standard. Compounds that showed significant anticancer and anti‐inflammatory activities were further studied for COX‐2 inhibition. The manifestation of a higher COX‐2 selectivity index of WSPP11 as compared with other derivatives and an in vitro anticancer activity against four cell lines further established that compounds that were more selective toward COX‐2 also exhibited a better spectrum of activity against various cancer cell lines.     

Design,synthesis, molecular docking,and anticancer evaluations of 1-benzylquinazoline-2,4(1H,3H)-dione bearing different moieties as VEGFR-2 inhibitors

A novel series of 1-benzylquinazoline-2,4(1H,3H)-dione derivatives, 6a , b to 11a – e , was designed, synthesized, and evaluated for their anticancer activity against HepG2, HCT-116, and MCF-7 cells. Compounds 11b , 11e , and 11c were found to be the most potent derivatives of all tested compounds against the HepG2, HCT-116, and MCF-7 cancer cell lines, with GI₅₀ = 9.16 ± 0.8, 5.69 ± 0.4, 5.27 ± 0.2 µM, 9.32 ± 0.9, 6.37 ± 0.7, 5.67 ± 0.5 µM, and 9.39 ± 0.5, 6.87 ± 0.7, 5.80 ± 0.4 µM, respectively. These compounds exhibited nearly the same activity as sorafenib against HepG2 and HCT-116 cells and a higher activity against MCF-7 cells (GI₅₀ = 9.18 ± 0.6, 5.47 ± 0.3, and 7.26 ± 0.3 µM, respectively). Also, these compounds displayed a lower activity than doxorubicin against HepG2 cells and a higher activity against HCT-116 and MCF-7 cells (GI₅₀ = 7.94 ± 0.6, 8.07 ± 0.8, and 6.75 ± 0.4 µM, respectively). The most active antiproliferative derivatives, 6a , b , 8 , 9 , and 11a – e , were selected to evaluate their enzymatic inhibitory activity against VEGFR-2. Compounds 11b , 11e , and 11c potently inhibited VEGFR-2 at IC₅₀ values of 0.12 ± 0.02, 0.12 ± 0.02, and 0.13 ± 0.02 µM, respectively, which are nearly equipotent as sorafenib IC₅₀ value (0.10 ± 0.02 µM). Furthermore, molecular docking studies were performed for all synthesized compounds to assess their binding pattern and affinity toward the VEGFR-2 active site.     

In-vitro antiproliferative activity of benzopyranone derivatives in comparison with standard chemotherapeutic drugs

The cytotoxic activities of five new benzopyranone derivatives containing basic amino side chain are described. Their cytotoxicities against ER(+) MCF‐7 and ER(–) MDA‐MB‐231 human breast cancer cell lines, and Ishikawa human endometrial cell line were determined after 72 h drug exposure employing CellTiter‐Glo assay at concentrations ranging from 0.01–1.0 × 10⁵ nM. The antiproliferative activities of these compounds were compared to tamoxifen (TAM), 4‐hydroxytamoxifen (4‐OHT, active metabolite of tamoxifen), and raloxifene (RAL). In‐vitro results indicated that compounds 9 , 10 , 12 , and 13 were more potent than TAM against the human breast cancer cell lines with IC₅₀ < 20 µM. The in‐silico structure–activity relationships of these compounds and their binding mode within the estrogen receptor (ER) binding site using AutoDock vina are discussed.     

Design,Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of 1,5‐Diaryl‐1,2,4‐triazole Derivatives as Selective Cyclooxygenase‐2 Inhibitors

A series of 1,5‐diaryl‐1,2,4‐triazole derivatives were synthesized and evaluated as cyclooxygenase‐2 (COX‐2) inhibitors. The results of the preliminary biological assays in vivo showed that eight compounds 5b , 6b , 6c , 7c , 8b , 8d , 9c , and 9d have potent anti‐inflammatory activity (P < 0.01), while compounds 6b , 6c , and 9c exhibit marked potency. Compound 6c was then selected for further investigation. In the COX inhibition assay in vitro, compound 6c was identified as a potent and selective inhibitor of COX‐2 (COX‐2 IC₅₀ = 0.37 µM; SI = 0.018), being equipotent to celecoxib (COX‐2 IC₅₀ = 0.26 µM; SI = 0.015). In a rat carrageenan‐induced paw edema assay, 6c exhibited moderate anti‐inflammatory activity (35% inhibition of inflammation) at 2 h after administration of 15 mg/kg as an oral dose. A docking study also revealed that compound 6c binds in the active site of COX‐2 in a similar mode to that of the known selective COX‐2 inhibitor SC‐558.