Factors influencing virological response to antiretroviral drugs in cerebrospinal fluid of advanced HIV-1-infected patients

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy in controlling cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) HIV-1 replication and to assess factors related to virological response in advanced patients. DESIGN: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study. METHODS: Consecutive paired CSF and plasma samples from HIV-1-infected patients were collected before starting or changing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). RESULTS: In the cross-sectional analysis 75 patients were included, 55 (73%) with neurological disease, 28 (37%) naive for antiretroviral agents. A significant correlation between plasma and CSF levels at baseline was observed only in antiretroviral-experienced patients. The absence of neurological disease, lower plasma HIV-1 load and a previous exposure to indinavir were all associated with a baseline CSF HIV-1-RNA level less than 80 copies/ml at multivariate analysis. In 29 patients included in the longitudinal study a significant reduction in CSF HIV-1 RNA was observed. Plasma HIV-1-RNA change, CSF HIV-1-RNA level at baseline, overall months of antiretroviral treatment and the magnitude of difference between plasma and CSF HIV-1-RNA levels were all correlated to CSF HIV-1-RNA change during treatment. A significant difference in the magnitude of CSF HIV-1-RNA reduction was observed according to naive status and to the use of three or more drugs penetrating the blood-brain barrier. CONCLUSION: HAART effectively reduces HIV-1 replication in CSF. A variable response to antiretroviral therapy was observed in CSF, reflecting a different compartmentalization of infection during treatment. Naive status and the use of CNS-penetrating drugs substantially enhance antiviral response. A negative interaction between virological response and the duration of antiretroviral treatment suggests long-term selection of drug-resistant CSF HIV-1 strains.     

Extent of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance as a predictor of virological failure after genotype-guided treatment switch.

Little is known about factors involved in virological response to treatment changes guided by genotyping in patients whose highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) fails. A 12-month observational study was conducted of 45 patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1, who underwent a new genotype-guided HAART regimen following virological treatment failure. Logistic regression models were used to define factors predictive of virological response to genotype-assisted treatment switches. Virological response was defined as achievement of a level of plasma HIV-1 RNA <1000 copies/mL at the end of the follow-up. Drug-resistance mutations were detected at baseline in 30 patients (66.7%). A sustained virological response to new treatment occurred in 13 (43.3%) of these, as opposed to 11 (73.3%) of the 15 patients harboring drug-susceptible virus at baseline (P=.07). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the number of drug classes where there was resistance at baseline was the only independent predictor of virological failure (P=.0313). Lack of virological response to genotype-guided treatment changes is primarily due to complex baseline resistance patterns. Benefits of antiretroviral resistance testing may be seriously limited by the lack of subsequent treatment options for heavily pretreated patients.     

Factors associated with virological response in HIV-infected patients failing antiretroviral therapy: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES: To assess the antiviral response to optimized therapy following genotypic resistance testing and to identify factors associated with virological response in HIV-1-infected patients failing antiretroviral therapy. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted in 344 HIV-1-infected patients who underwent genotypic resistance testing because of virological failure. Virological response was defined as a plasma HIV RNA level below 200 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL or a drop of plasma viral load from baseline of more than 1 log10. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with virological response. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 40 years, with a male to female ratio of 4:1. Fifty-one per cent of patients had received the three major classes of antiretrovirals and the median duration of previous antiretroviral therapy was 4.6 years. At baseline, the median plasma HIV RNA level was 4.4 log10 copies/mL and the median CD4 cell count was 274 cells/microL. At 3 months, 55% of patients (188 of 344) had a virological response, which was sustained at 6 months (53%). Predictors of virological response were exposure to two or fewer protease inhibitors [odds ratio (OR) 1.8; P=0.046], and use in optimized therapy of a new class of antiretrovirals (OR 2.9; P=0.006), of more than two new drugs (OR 3.0; P<0.0001), of abacavir (OR 1.9; P=0.03), or of lopinavir/ritonavir (OR 3.7; P=0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of patients achieved a short-term virological response in this cohort study. Patients with the least experience of protease inhibitor treatment and in whom a new class of antiretroviral, more than two new drugs, abacavir or lopinavir/ritonavir was used in optimized therapy had the best virological outcome.     

Prospective comparison of first-line nelfinavir therapy versus nelfinavir introduction in rescue antiretroviral regimens

In order to establish the role of the protease inhibitor nelfinavir in current clinical practice, a prospective 18-month open-label comparison of efficacy and tolerability of nelfinavir was performed among HIV-infected patients who either incorporated nelfinavir in their first-line highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen (group A, 57 patients), or who added nelfinavir to a rescue antiretroviral regimen (following at least two attempts with protease inhibitor-based HAART) (group B, 67 patients). All evaluable data were analyzed according to the prior and concurrent antiretroviral therapy, including genotypic resistance assays for patients undergoing salvage therapy. A significantly better virologic outcome (as expressed by a > 2 log(10) drop of plasma viremia versus baseline or attainment of undetectable levels), was shown among patients belonging to group A versus group B, where a number of genotypic mutations possibly elicited by previous anti-HIV treatment strongly impaired a potent and sustained nelfinavir activity. On the whole, the immunologic response (as expressed by the mean CD4(+) lymphocyte count versus baseline), substantially paralleled the virologic one in all analyzed subgroups, but a tendency toward a maintained immunologic competence was also observed in the majority of patients experiencing virologic failure. Nelfinavir introduction was sufficiently safe, because a limited percentage of patients suffered from mild-to-moderate, novel, or continuing adverse events, which proved significantly more frequent in the salvage group but did not affect adherence to HAART.     

The normalized inhibitory quotient of boosted protease inhibitors is predictive of viral load response in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected individuals

OBJECTIVE: The normalized inhibitory quotient (NIQ) has been proposed as a measure for refining the precision of HIV resistance testing when selecting antiretroviral therapy (ART). We undertook an assessment of NIQ and 48-week virological outcome in patients commencing ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI) regimens. DESIGN: A cohort of 87 HIV-infected individuals who all had extensive prior exposure to ART were assigned a new boosted PI regimen following resistance testing. PI therapy consisted of lopinavir, indinavir, saquinavir and amprenavir at 50, 32, 11 and 6%, respectively. Fold change (FC) for each PI was determined from the resistance test at baseline. Trough drug concentration (Cmin) was determined at week 4. METHODS: NIQ was derived individually by taking the logarithm of the ratio of Cmin/FC divided by the fixed ratio of population mean trough drug concentration/clinical cut off. Associations between viral load (VL) response over 48 weeks with baseline VL, FC, Cmin, NIQ and selected PI were assessed. RESULTS: Mean change from baseline VL reduced by 0.83 log at week 48. In multivariate analyses, baseline VL and NIQ were the parameters most associated with change from baseline VL at week 48 (P = 0.012 and 0.003, respectively). FC, Cmin and selected PI were not significantly associated with VL changes. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of highly treatment-experienced individuals treated with boosted PI regimens, baseline VL and NIQ were significantly predictive of virological response over 48 weeks whereas FC and Cmin were not. These results support the use of a NIQ at week 4, as a tool for predicting response to therapy in this setting.     

Predictors of virological rebound in HIV-1-infected patients initiating a protease inhibitor-containing regimen.

OBJECTIVE: To study the predictors of virological rebound in patients having early virological response to protease inhibitor (PI)-containing regimen. DESIGN AND METHODS: APROCO cohort study prospectively enrolled 1283 HIV-infected patients starting a PI-containing regimen in 1997-1999. Adherence to therapy was measured with self-administered questionnaires after 4 months of therapy (M4). Virological rebound was defined as a viral load (VL) > 500 copies/ml in patients having early virological response, defined as a VL < 500 copies/ml at M4. Predictors of time to virological rebound were studied with multivariate proportional hazards model. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 20 months, virological rebound was observed in 32% of the 830 patients with early virological response. Virological rebound was more frequent when patients had received previous antiretroviral treatment [adjusted hazards ratio (HR) = 2.4; P < 0.0001], were younger (HR = 1.4 per each 10 years younger; P < 0.0001), had baseline CD4 cell count < 500 x 106/l (HR = 2.3; P < 0.001), had higher baseline VL (HR = 1.4 per each log10 copies/ml higher; P < 0.001), reported low adherence to therapy at M4 (HR = 2.1; P < 0.001) or had stopped PI at M4 (HR = 1.7; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Initiation of treatment at a stage of preserved immunity is associated with a more durable virological response under protease inhibitor. Every effort should be made to monitor and strengthen adherence to therapy, even in patients having early virological response.     

Utility of repeat genotypic resistance testing and clinical response in patients with three class resistance and virologic treatment failure

We sought to determine the utility of repeat genotypic resistance testing (GRT) and the clinical response in HIV-1-infected patients with known resistance to three of the major classes of antiretroviral drugs. The HIV-1 genetic sequences for 20 patients who had high-level 3 class resistance demonstrated on a prior GRT (3C-GRT 1) measured during the period from November 1, 2000 through July 1, 2004 were retrospectively evaluated. At the time of 3C-GRT 1, the median CD4 count and HIV-1 RNA viral load were 168 cells/mm(3) and 4.5 log copies per milliliter, respectively. The median time to the second GRT (3C-GRT 2) was 17 months. At that time, the median CD4 count and VL were 140 cells/mm(3) and 4.9 log copies per milliliter (p = 0.8 and p = 0.12, respectively). On 3C-GRT 2, all patients retained essentially identical mutations, with the exception of the loss of the M184V mutation in 6 patients. After 3C-GRT 2, all patients continued on protease inhibitor-containing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens. At 24 weeks after 3C-GRT 2, there was no significant change in CD4 count or HIV-1 RNA viral load (p = 0.68 and p = 0.30, respectively). Repeat GRT in patients with documented high-level 3 class resistance does not provide new or clinically useful information. Under continued antiretroviral selective pressure, the viral genetic sequences in this patient population remained stable. In addition, continuing HAART regimens containing protease inhibitors appeared to forestall further immunological and virologic deterioration in patients with multiple resistance mutations. Providers should focus on obtaining access to combinations of novel agents for patients with 3 class resistance rather than repeated GRT.     

Cidofovir added to HAART improves virological and clinical outcome in AIDS-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the virological and clinical efficacy of cidofovir combined with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in AIDS-related progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). DESIGN: Multicentre observational study of consecutive HIV-positive patients with histologically or virologically-proven PML. Group A, 26 patients treated with HAART; group B, 14 patients treated with HAART plus cidofovir 5 mg/kg intravenously per week for the first 2 weeks and alternate weeks thereafter. JC virus DNA was quantified in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by PCR. RESULTS: Baseline virological, immunological and clinical characteristics were homogeneous between the groups. In one case cidofovir was discontinued because of severe proteinuria. There was no significant difference in HIV RNA responses and changes in the number of CD4 cells between group A and B. After 2 months of therapy, five out of 12 (42%) patients from group A and seven out of eight (87%) from group B reached undetectable JC virus DNA in the CSF (Chi-square P = 0.04); moreover, 24% of group A and 57% of group B patients showed neurological improvement or stability (P = 0.038). One-year cumulative probability of survival was 0.67 with cidofovir and 0.31 without (log-rank test, P = 0.01). Variables independently associated with longer survival were the use of cidofovir, HAART prior to the onset of PML, a baseline JC virus DNA load in CSF < 4.7 log10 copies/ml, and a baseline Karnofsky performance status > or = 60. CONCLUSIONS: In AIDS-related PML, cidofovir added to HAART is associated with a more effective control of JCV replication, with improved neurological outcome and survival compared with HAART alone.     

Delayed central nervous system virus suppression during highly active antiretroviral therapy is associated with HIV encephalopathy,but not with viral drug resistance or poor central nervous system drug penetration

OBJECTIVE: HIV-1 encephalopathy (HIVE) is associated with high levels of viral RNA in the central nervous system (CNS). Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) effectively reduces HIV replication in both plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Some individuals, however, exhibit delayed CSF HIV RNA suppression in the presence of rapid plasma responses. We investigated the reasons for this discrepancy. DESIGN: CSF and plasma were collected prospectively in paired samples before and once or several times during HAART in 40 HIV-positive subjects. Ten had HIVE and 30 patients were neurologically asymptomatic or had non-HIVE neurological manifestations. METHODS: The slopes of viral RNA decay during HAART were compared between the compartments. The presence of HIVE was defined by clinical standards and its severity categorized according to the Memorial Sloan Kettering score. CSF and plasma levels of antiretroviral drugs were measured. Viral drug resistance during HAART in CSF and plasma was analysed both genotypically and phenotypically. RESULTS: Slow CSF viral decay and a high degree of compartmental discordance (slopeCSF/slopeplasma) were both significantly correlated with HIVE (P < 0.00002). There was no correlation of a rapid CSF response with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention stage, CD4 cell count, or with the number of antiretroviral compounds and their known CSF penetration. Slow CSF viral decay was associated with neither low levels of antiretroviral drugs in the CSF or plasma, nor with viral drug resistance. CONCLUSIONS: None of the treatment-associated variables, but only the presence of HIVE, was associated with delayed virus elimination during HAART in the CSF. This suggests a distinct pattern of viral replication in the CNS in HIVE.