Disposition of propofol infusions for caesarean section

The disposition of propofol was studied in women undergoing elective Caesarean section. Indices of maternal recovery and neonatal assessment were correlated with venous concentrations of propofol. After induction of anaesthesia with propofol 2.0 mg.kg-1, ten patients received propofol 6 mg.kg-1.hr-1 with nitrous oxide 50 per cent in oxygen (low group) and nine were given propofol 9 mg.kg-1.hr-1 with oxygen 100 per cent (high group). Pharmacokinetic variables were similar between the groups. The mean +/- SD Vss = 2.38 +/- 1.16 L.kg-1, Cl = 39.2 +/- 9.75 ml.min-1.kg-1 and t1/2 beta = 126 +/- 68.7 min. At the time of delivery (8-16 min), the concentration of propofol ranged from 1.91-3.82 micrograms.ml-1 in the maternal vein (MV), 1.00-2.00 micrograms.ml-1 in the umbilical vein (UV) and 0.53-1.66 micrograms.ml-1 in the umbilical artery (UA). Neonates with high UV concentrations of propofol at delivery had lower neurologic and adaptive capacity scores 15 minutes later. The concentrations of propofol were similar between groups during the infusion but they declined at a faster rate in the low group postoperatively. Maternal recovery times did not depend on the total dose of propofol but the concentration of propofol at the time of eye opening was greater in the high group than the low group (1.74 +/- 0.51 vs 1.24 +/- 0.32 micrograms.ml-1, P less than 0.01). The rapid placental transfer of propofol during Caesarean section requires propofol infusions to be given cautiously, especially when induction to delivery times are long.     

Haemodynamic interactions of muscle relaxants and sufentanil in coronary artery surgery

The haemodynamic interactions between sufentanil (S) and muscle relaxants (MR) were studied in 40 ASA physical status III or IV patients (four groups of ten) scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting (ABG). Group I received pancuronium (P) 0.08 mg.kg-1, Group II received vecuronium (V) 0.1 mg.kg-1, Group III received atracurium (A) 0.5 mg.kg-1 and Group IV metocurine 0.1 mg.kg-1 plus pancuronium 0.02 mg.kg-1 (M-P). Sufentanil, 20 micrograms.kg-1 was administered before sternotomy, 10 micrograms.kg-1 being injected before tracheal intubation and 10 micrograms.kg-1 afterwards. Heart rate (HR), ECG leadII and V5, systolic, diastolic and mean arterial and pulmonary blood pressures, central venous pressure (CVP) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (W) were measured and recorded at the time of seven strategic events between the pre-induction of anaesthesia period and sternotomy. Cardiac output (CO) and systemic vascular resistances (SVR) were also measured before induction of anaesthesia and after the administration of S 10 micrograms.kg-1 plus the MR. The HR decreased from baseline values in the post-tracheal intubation period in all groups except in P group. The mean arterial pressure also decreased significantly in all groups except in the P group. The CO did not change from baseline values but SVR decreased in all groups. There was no evidence of new myocardial ischaemia according to the ECG monitoring and there was no significant difference in the HR changes between patients who had or who had not received beta-blockers in any group. We conclude that within the present study conditions and design, HR and blood pressure changed least with pancuronium.     

Randomized comparison of outcome after propofol-nitrous oxide or enflurane-nitrous oxide anaesthesia in operations of long duration

A randomized, prospective, comparative study was performed to evaluate induction characteristics, haemodynamic changes and recovery in 60 ASA I-II patients undergoing mainly gynaecological laparotomies with either propofol or thiopentone-enflurane anaesthesia. The propofol group (n = 30) received 2 mg.kg-1 propofol for induction of anaesthesia followed by propofol infusion. The thiopentone-enflurane group (n = 30) received thiopentone 4 mg.kg-1 for induction followed by enflurane (0.5-2 per cent). All patients received nitrous oxide (66 per cent] in oxygen begun one minute after tracheal intubation, and fentanyl (1.5 micrograms.kg-1) four minutes prior to induction. Other drugs administered during or after anaesthesia were similar among the groups. Haemodynamic measurements were similar between propofol and enflurane groups except after tracheal intubation when the mean arterial pressure was lower in the propofol group (P less than 0.05). The propofol group had significantly less (P less than 0.01) emesis in the recovery room than the enflurane group. The propofol group experienced significantly less (P less than 0.05) dizziness, depression/sadness and hunger than the enflurane group in the postoperative period as assessed with a visual analogue questionnaire. We conclude that propofol provided better outcome than enflurane in terms of these nonvital but annoying outcome measures after relatively long intra-abdominal operations.     

Low-dose sufentanil in major surgery

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of sufentanil 1 micrograms.kg-1 during N2O-O2 and intermittent isoflurane anaesthesia in major non-cardiac surgery. Thirty-one patients (18 females, 13 males; mean age 47 yr), undergoing cholecystectomy received a 1 microgram.kg-1 bolus of sufentanil before the induction of anaesthesia with thiopentone. On average, three sufentanil increments were administered, to a total (bolus + maintenance) dose of 1.5 micrograms.kg-1. Cardiovascular stability was not achieved in eleven patients who then were given isoflurane. The arterial pressure decreased after sufentanil (P less than 0.05), reaching a nadir (mean 108/65 mmHg, heart rate 63 bpm) at one minute post-incision. Clinically important hypertension or hypotension did not occur in any patient. One patient, receiving beta-blocker therapy, required atropine to control bradycardia. Postoperative respiratory depression did not occur in patients who received less than one micrograms.kg-1.hr-1 with the last increment being given more than 20 minutes before the end of anaesthesia. Slight respiratory depression in the recovery room was reported in one patient, who had received a total of 1.3 micrograms.kg-1.hr-1 of sufentanil, and the last sufentanil increment 24 min before the end of surgery. The most frequently reported side-effects were nausea (35 per cent) and vomiting (23 per cent). Induction, maintenance and recovery from anaesthesia were rated as "good" in 87, 87, and 74 per cent of the cases, respectively, and "satisfactory" in the remainder. We conclude that this technique is valuable to assure good protection of the cardiovascular system without undue respiratory depression during recovery.     

Neuromuscular and cardiovascular effects of mivacurium chloride in surgical patients receiving nitrous oxide-narcotic or nitrous oxide-isoflurane anaesthesia

The neuromuscular and cardiovascular effects of mivacurium chloride were studied during nitrous oxide-oxygen narcotic (fentanyl) (n = 90) and nitrous oxide-oxygen isoflurane (ISO) anaesthesia (n = 45). In addition, a separate group (n = 9) received succinylcholine during fentanyl anaesthesia to compare its neuromuscular effects with mivacurium. Mivacurium was initially administered as a single bolus in doses from 0.03 mg.kg-1 to 0.25 mg.kg-1 to study the dose-response relationships, as well as the cardiovascular effects of mivacurium. Neuromuscular block (NMB) was measured by recording the twitch response of the adductor pollicis muscle following ulnar nerve stimulation (0.15 Hz, 0.2 ms supramaximal voltage). The ED95 values for mivacurium were estimated to be 0.073 mg.kg-1 and 0.053 mg.kg-1 in the fentanyl and ISO groups respectively. The duration of block (time from injection to 95 per cent recovery) for a dose of 0.05 mg.kg-1 mivacurium was 15.3 +/- 1.0 min and 21.5 +/- 1.3 min for fentanyl and ISO anaesthesia, respectively. The recovery index (25-75 per cent) between initial bolus dose (6.1 +/- 0.5 min), repeat bolus doses (7.6 +/- 0.6 min), mivacurium infusion (6.7 +/- 0.7 min) and succinylcholine infusion (6.8 +/- 1.8 min) were not significantly different. There was minimal change in mean arterial pressure (MAP) or heart rate (HR) following bolus doses of mivacurium up to 0.15 mg.kg-1. Bolus administration of 0.20 mg.kg-1 or 0.25 mg.kg-1 of mivacurium decreased MAP from 78.2 +/- 2.5 to 64.0 +/- 3.2 mmHg (range 12-59 per cent of control) (P less than 0.05). The same doses when administered slowly over 30 sec produced minimal change in MAP or HR.     

Left ventricular regional wall motion and haemodynamic changes following bolus administration of pipecuronium or pancuronium to adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

The objective of this study was to compare the haemodynamic and myocardial effects of pipecuronium and pancuronium in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) during benzodiazepine/sufentanil anaesthesia. Twenty-seven ASA III–IV patients received lorazepam (1–3 mg) po and midazolam (<0.1 mg · kg^?1) iv before induction of anaesthesia with sufentanil (3–8 μg · kg^?1). Vecuronium (0.1 mg · kg^?1) was administered to facilitate tracheal intubation. According to random allocation, each patient received either pipecuronium (150 μg · kg^?1) or pancuronium (120 μg · kg^?1) after stemotomy but before heparinization. Mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure (CVP), pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), ST segment position and ECG (leads HI, V₅, AVF) were monitored continuously throughout the procedure. Thermodilution determinations of CO in triplicate were made immediately before, and at two and five minutes after muscle relaxant administration. Multiplane transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE, midpapillary short axis views of the left ventricle) images were continuously recorded from ten minutes before until ten minutes after muscle relaxant administration and graded by two experienced echocardiographic readers. Heart rate, MAP and CO increased after administration of pancuronium (by 13.6 beats · min^?1, 10.8 mmHg and 1.0 L · min^?1 respectively) but not after pipecuronium (P < 0.05). Evidence of myocardial ischaemia was not detected in any patients using ECG ST segment analysis or TEE assessment of left ventricular wall motion. We conclude that pancuronium caused increases in HR, MAP and CO but that neither pancuronium nor pipecuronium caused myocardial ischaemia.     

Intraocular pressure in anaesthetized dogs given flumazenil with and without prior administration of midazolam

This study examined the effect of flumazenil, a benzodiazepine antagonist, on aqueous humour pressure in dogs receiving either midazolam or no benzodiazepine. Twenty-four halothane-anaesthetized dogs were assigned to one of four groups. Group I (n = 6) received saline iv at 0, 45 and 90 min. Group 2 (n = 6) received saline at 0 min, flumazenil 0.0025 mg.kg-1 iv at 45 min and flumazenil 0.16 mg.kg-1 at 90 min. Group 3 (n = 6) received midazolam 1.6 mg.kg-1 at 0 min followed by continuous iv infusion (1.25 mg.kg-1.hr-1). Flumazenil was given at 45 and 90 min as in Group 2. In Group 4 (n = 6) aqueous humour pressure was elevated to about 35 mmHg then midazolam and flumazenil were given as in Group 3. Aqueous humour pressure was determined using a 30-gauge needle placed into the anterior chamber. Saline or flumazenil produced no change in aqueous humour pressure in Groups 1 and 2. In Groups 3 and 4, midazolam decreased aqueous humour pressure from 18 +/- 2 mmHg (mean +/- SD) to 14 +/- 3 mmHg (P less than 0.001) and from 34 +/- 5 mmHg to 31 +/- 3 mmHg (P less than 0.01) respectively. Flumazenil given during continuous infusion of midazolam produced increases of aqueous humour pressure of 2 +/- 1 (P less than 0.01) to 5 +/- 2 mmHg (P less than 0.01) that lasted less than or equal to 12 min. It is concluded that at both normal and elevated aqueous humour pressures flumazenil produces statistically significant but clinically unimportant increases of aqueous humour pressure in anaesthetized dogs receiving midazolam, but not in dogs given no benzodiazepine.     

Comparaison de l’incidence sur le saignement de deux techniques anesthésiques midazolam-alfentanil versus propofol-alfentanil lors de la cure d’otospongiose

This study was performed to compare the incidence of bleeding associated with two anaesthetic techniques during otolaryngological microsurgery. Twenty-eight venous interpositions for otospongiosis have been carried out at random either under local anaesthesia combined with light sedation (midazolam 0.1 mg.kg-1 and alfentanil 0 micrograms.kg-1) or using general anaesthesia (propofol 2.5 mg.kg-1, then 9 mg.kg-1.hr-1 and alfentanil 30 micrograms.kg-1, then 15 micrograms.kg-1). The patients' lungs were mechanically ventilated. Every ten minutes, heart rate, arterial blood pressure and FETCO2 were observed. Bleeding was assessed on a four-point scale and evaluated according to its duration and the annoyance that it caused. General anaesthesia was clinically better tolerated. Heart rate and arterial blood pressure were lower than with general anaesthesia. The end-expiratory CO2 was 4.7 +/- 0.2 per cent. Bleeding was less frequent, lasted less time, but when it occurred the surgical disturbance was identical in the two groups. General anaesthesia produced a less bloody operating field and local anaesthesia required the cooperation of the patient.     

Low-dose sufentanil and lidocaine supplementation of general anaesthesia

This randomized double-blind study compared the effects of: (1) saline infusion (C); (2) sufentanil alone (1.0 micrograms.kg-1) (S); and (3) low-dose sufentanil (0.5 micrograms.kg-1) in combination with lidocaine (1.5 mg.kg-1) (LS): on the cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation and on postoperative ventilation as monitored by respiratory inductive plethysmography in day-care surgical procedures of approximately 60 min duration. Thirty healthy, unpremedicated patients were studied. Thiopentone requirements were reduced by 40 and 28 per cent in the S and LS groups respectively compared with control (P less than 0.001). Both treatments suppressed HR and BP responses (P less than 0.005) to intubation. Postoperatively, PaCO2 was elevated (P less than 0.05) in group S. Dose-related respiratory depression was observed. The incidence of postoperative apnoea was significantly higher in both S and LS groups than compared with control (P less than 0.05). However, only patients in group S showed higher apnoea index and mean apnoea duration over the initial 10-20 min after surgery compared with control (P less than 0.005). In addition, group S showed slower respiratory frequency and prolonged expiratory time (P less than 0.005). In conclusion, an induction dose of sufentanil (1 microgram.kg-1) used in balanced anaesthesia of less than 70 min duration was associated with significant respiratory depression, particularly during the initial 10-20 min after surgery, whereas low-dose sufentanil (0.5 micrograms.kg-1) with lidocaine (1.5 mg.kg-1) had minimal postoperative respiratory depression and comparable attenuation of pressor responses to intubation.     

Pharmacokinetics and cardiovascular dynamics of pipecuronium bromide during coronary artery surgery

The haemodynamic effects of 200 micrograms.kg-1 pipecuronium and pancuronium were compared under etomidate/piritramide anaesthesia in 20 patients scheduled for elective coronary artery surgery. Following the completion of the haemodynamic measurements (ten minutes), anaesthesia was maintained by etomidate/sufentanil infusion. The mean changes in cardiac output were approximately -19 and -2 per cent and in heart rate -1 and +26 per cent for pipecuronium and pancuronium respectively. Plasma and urine concentrations of pipecuronium were also measured and the pharmacokinetic variables obtained indicated rapid initial decrease in plasma concentration (t1/2 = 7.6 minutes) followed by a longer terminal phase (t1/2 = 161 minutes). The central compartment volume was 102 +/- 24 ml.kg-1 and plasma clearance was 1.8 +/- 0.4 ml.kg-1 min-1. Approximately 56 per cent of the dose was recovered from the urine within 24 hours of administration and about 25 per cent of this was the metabolite, 3-desacetyl pipecuronium. High-dose pipecuronium administration under the anaesthetic regimen employed did not produce deleterious haemodynamic effects. The pharmacokinetic variables after bolus injection of pipecuronium did not deviate from those reported under normothermic conditions.     

Clinical and pharmacokinetic aspects of the combination of meperidine and prilocaine for spinal anaesthesia

The aim of this study was to determine whether the addition of a small dose of prilocaine could augment the spinal block induced by meperidine and affect intrathecal meperidine pharmacokinetic behaviour. Spinal anaesthesia was performed in 60 men scheduled for endoscopic resection of a prostatic adenoma or bladder tumour under spinal anaesthesia. They were allocated randomly to receive either 1 mg.kg-1 meperidine (Group 1, n = 30), or 1 mg.kg-1 meperidine plus 0.5 mg.kg-1 prilocaine (Group 2, n = 30). Blood samples were collected prior to and for 24 hr after spinal injection in 24 patients (12 in each group). Plasma meperidine levels were assayed by gas chromatography. Complete motor block was achieved in all Group 2 patients, but was incomplete in seven of Group 1 (P less than 0.05). The onset of both motor and sensory blocks was shorter (P less than 0.01) in Group 2 and the duration was longer (P less than 0.05). Coadministration of prilocaine modifies meperidine pharmacokinetic behaviour. The area under curve was 48% greater (P less than 0.01) and Cmax was higher in Group 2 than in Group 1, 145.8 +/- 42.2 vs 107 +/- 20.5 ng.ml-1 (P less than 0.001). No evidence of respiratory depression was noted in any of the patients. Despite the increase in plasma meperidine concentrations, no side effects were observed. The plasma concentrations remained at one third to one sixth the levels reported to induce a respiratory depression. It is concluded that the addition of prilocaine to meperidine improves motor and sensory block during surgery and alters meperidine kinetics without producing major side effects.     

Postoperative haemodynamic and pharmacological responses in patients with positive technetium pyrophosphate single-photon emission computed tomography following CABG

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the postoperative haemodynamic variables and medication requirements in patients with perioperative myocardial infarction (PMI), following elective coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, as documented by technetium pyrophosphate scintigraphy using single-photon emission computed tomography (TcPPi-SPECT). A high-dose fentanyl anaesthetic technique was applied. Twelve of 58 patients (21%) developed PMI with an infarcted myocardial mass of 35.7 +/- 3.9 g. Over the 48 hr postoperative period, patients with positive TcPPi-SPECT (n = 12) did not differ from those with negative TcPPi-SPECT (n = 46) in mean heart rate (below 100 bpm), systolic blood pressure (100-120 mmHg) or central venous pressure (8-16 mmHg). However, patients with positive TcPPi-SPECT had higher pulmonary artery diastolic pressures at 5-8 hr after surgery. No differences were found in the incidence and dosage requirements for postoperative sedative or vasoactive drugs (morphine, diazepam, propranolol, lidocaine, nitroglycerin and nitroprusside) between the two groups. There was no difference in the incidence of dopamine requirement between the groups (positive-scan: 16.7%, negative-scan: 13.0%). However, the dopamine dosage for inotropic support was higher in the positive TcPPi-SPECT group over 24 hr (318.5 +/- 125.2 mg vs 71.2 +/- 24.7 mg, P less than 0.05) and 48 hr (869.1 +/- 19.0 mg vs 142.3 +/- 49.4 mg, P less than 0.001) periods after surgery. We postulate that careful control of postoperative haemodynamic variables did not prevent but may limit the extent of PMI in elective CABG patients.     

Comparative evaluation of propofol and thiopentone for total intravenous anaesthesia

Sixty unpremedicated ASA physical status I or II patients scheduled for surgical procedures of intermediate duration (15 to 60 min) were studied to evaluate the safety and efficacy of propofol, to measure recovery times and to compare the return of psychomotor and cognitive function with thiopentone. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups. Anaesthesia was induced and maintained by either propofol (2.0-2.5 mg.kg-1 followed by a continuous infusion 0.1-0.2 mg.kg-1.min-1) or thiopentone (4.0-5.0 mg.kg-1, and infusion rate 0.16-0.32 mg.kg-1.min-1), titrated to patient response. Succinylcholine was administered to facilitate tracheal intubation and maintain neuromuscular blockade. Induction of anaesthesia was slightly longer with propofol than thiopentone (42.2 vs 29.8 sec) and was smooth with both drugs. Post-intubation increases in heart rate, and systolic and diastolic blood pressures were attenuated by propofol when compared with thiopentone. After the administration of propofol, times to eye opening (6.4 +/- 4.3 vs 13.9 +/- 15.9 min), response to verbal command (7.6 +/- 6.3 vs 15.4 +/- 16.6 min) and orientation (22.7 +/- 12.8 vs 36.2 +/- 23.1 min), were significantly shorter. Psychomotor and cognitive function returned earlier with propofol and fewer side effects were noted. At 24 hr there was no distinguishable difference between groups. Propofol is a safe anaesthetic agent with the potential for early patient discharge and street fitness after outpatient procedures.     

Alfentanil infusion for sedation in infants and small children during cardiac catheterization

We have analyzed several sedation techniques for paediatric cardiac catheterization which offer stable conditions for a few hours investigation, and maintain spontaneous breathing. In the present study, after premedication with oral flunitrazepam 0.1 mg.kg-1, 14 children aged 1-17 mo were sedated with an individually titrated alfentanil infusion. Every patient was sedated to a level which produced no reaction to pain or any discomfort. The induction dose and the maintenance requirement of alfentanil were 24 +/- 8 micrograms.kg-1 and 32 +/- 8 micrograms.kg-1.hr-1 (mean +/- SD), respectively. These doses were less in cyanotic than in acyanotic patients: 21 +/- 6 vs 28 +/- 8 micrograms.kg-1 and 29 +/- 10 vs 34 +/- 3 micrograms.kg-1.hr-1, respectively (P less than 0.05). The mean plasma concentration of alfentanil during maintenance of sedation was 79 +/- 23 ng.ml-1. Ventilation of two children was assisted for a short time after an incremental bolus of alfentanil. It is concluded that an alfentanil infusion technique with close monitoring of breathing is a practical sedation method for paediatric cardiac catheterization.     

Haemodynamic instability and myocardial ischaemia during carotid endarterectomy: A comparison of propofol and isoflurane

The purpose of this study was to compare two anaesthetic protocols for haemodynamic instability (heart rate (HR) or mean arterial pressure (MAP) <80 or > 120% of ward baseline values) measured at one-minute intervals during carotid endarterectomy (CEA). One group received propofol/alfentanil (Group Prop; n = 14) and the other isoflurane I alfentanil (Group Iso; n = 13). Periods of haemodynamic instability were correlated to episodes of myocardial ischaemia as assessed by Holler monitoring (begun the evening before surgery and ceasing the morning of the first postoperative day). In Group Prop, anaesthesia was induced with alfentanil 30 μg · kg^?1 rv, propofol up to 1.5 mg · kg^?1 and vecuronium 0.15 mg · kg^?1, and maintained with infusions of propofol at 3–12 mg · kg^?1· hr^?1 and alfentanil at 30 μg · kg^?1 · hr^?1. In Group Iso, anaesthesia was induced with alfentanil and vecuronium as above, thiopentone up to 4 mg · kg^?1 and maintained with isoflurane and alfentanil infusion. Phenylephrine was infused to support MAP at 110 ± 10% of ward values during cross-clamp of the internal carotid artery (ICA) in both groups. Emergence hypertension and/or tachycardia was treated with labetalol, diazoxide or propranolol. Myocardial ischaemia was defined as ST-segment depression of >-1 mm (60 msec past the J-point) persisting for >-one minute. For the entire anaesthetic course (induction to post-emergence), there was no difference between groups for either duration or magnitude outside the <80 or >120% range for HR or MAP. However, when the period of emergence from anaesthesia (reversal of neuromuscular blockade to post-extubation) was assessed, more patients were hypertensive (P = 0.004) and required vasodilator therapy in Group Iso (10/ 13 vs 5/14; P = 0.038 Fisher’s Exact Test). The mean dose of labetalol was greater in Group Iso (P = 0.035). No patient demonstrated myocardial ischaemia during ICA cross-clamp. On emergence, 6/13 patients in Group Iso demonstrated myocardial ischaemia compared with 1/14 in Group Prop (P = 0.029). Therefore, supporting the blood pressure with phenylephrine, during the period of ICA cross-clamping, appears to be safe as we did not observe any myocardial ischaemia at this time. During emergence from anaesthesia, haemodynamic instability was associated with myocardial ischaemia. Under these specific experimental conditions, with emergence, hypertension and myocardial ischaemia were more prevalent with more frequent pharmacological interventions in patients receiving isoflurane.     

Atrial natriuretic peptide responses during anaesthesia in patients with refractory cardiomyopathies

In patients with congestive heart failure, the release of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) is decreased. This study sought to determine the extent of ANP, sympathetic and haemodynamic responses to acutely increased atrial pressure in patients with cardiomyopathies undergoing orthotopic cardiac transplantation. Haemodynamic variables, plasma ANP, norepinephrine, and epinephrine concentrations were measured in 17 patients at five times before and after induction of anaesthesia using either ketamine 1.5 micrograms.kg-1 or sufentanil 3.6 +/- 0.3 micrograms.kg-1. Preinduction values in the ketamine and sufentanil groups were not significantly different. Compared with preinduction values, increases in mean arterial pressure (26%), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (90%), right atrial pressure (107%), and heart rate (24%) occurred in the ketamine group while cardiac index decreased by 19% (P less than 0.05). Haemodynamic variables in the sufentanil group did not change at any of the times studied. Plasma concentrations of atrial natriuretic peptide were not different within or between treatment groups. Following tracheal intubation plasma norepinephrine levels increased by 116% in the ketamine group (P less than 0.05), but did not change in the sufentanil group. Plasma norepinephrine concentrations differed significantly between the ketamine and sufentanil groups. There were no differences in epinephrine concentrations in either group. Despite the anticipated haemodynamic and catecholamine differences found between the ketamine and sufentanil groups, the levels of plasma ANP were similar. Based upon these results, it is concluded that ANP exerts little influence in the control of fluid volume or blood pressure in patients with refractory cardiomyopathy.     

Thiopentone pretreatment for propofol injection pain in ambulatory patients

This study investigated propofol injection pain in patients undergoing ambulatory anaesthesia. In a randomized, double-blind trial, 90 women were allocated to receive one of three treatments prior to induction of anaesthesia with propofol. Patients in Group C received 2 ml normal saline, Group L, 2 ml, lidocaine 2% (40 mg) and Group T, 2 ml thiopentone 2.5% (50 mg). Venous discomfort was assessed with a visual analogue scale (VAS) 5–15 sec after commencing propofol administration using an infusion pump (rate 1000 μg · kg^?1 · min^?1). Loss of consciousness occurred in 60–90 sec. Visual analogue scores (mean ± SD) during induction were lower in Groups L (3.3 ± 2.5) and T (4.1 ± 2.7) than in Group C (5.6 ± 2.3); P = 0.0031. The incidence of venous discomfort was lower in Group L (76.6%; P < 0.05) than in Group C (100%) but not different from Group T (90%). The VAS scores for recall of pain in the recovery room were correlated with the VAS scores during induction (r = 0.7045; P < 0.0001). Recovery room discharge times were similar: C (75.9 ± 19.4 min); L 73.6 ± 21.6 min); T (77.1 ± 18.9 min). Assessing their overall satisfaction, 89.7% would choose propofol anaesthesia again. We conclude that lidocaine reduces the incidence and severity of propofol injection pain in ambulatory patients whereas thiopentone only reduces its severity.     

A comparison of fentanyl,esmolol, and their combination for blunting the haemodynamic responses during rapid-sequence induction

The purpose of this randomized, double-blind study was to compare the ability of a combination of fentanyl and esmolol to blunt the haemodynamic effects of intubation with that of either agent alone. Patients received fentanyl or saline four minutes before, and esmolol or saline two minutes before rapid-sequence induction of anaesthesia. The F2 group (n = 24) received fentanyl 2 micrograms.kg-1, the E2 group (n = 24) received esmolol 2 mg.kg-1, the F2/E2 group (n = 25) received a combination of fentanyl 2 micrograms.kg-1 and esmolol 2 mg.kg-1, and the F5 group (n = 26) received fentanyl 5 micrograms.kg-1. Following tracheal intubation, the maximum percent change from baseline heart rate was less in the F2/E2 and F5 groups (12% and 16% respectively) than in the E2 group (34%)(P < 0.05). The maximum percent changes from baseline systolic blood pressure in the F2/E2 and F5 groups (15% and 6% respectively) were less than in the F2 and E2 groups (24% and 33% respectively) (P < 0.05). The combination of a low dose of fentanyl and esmolol provides an alternative to a higher dose of fentanyl for blunting the haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation during rapid-sequence induction in healthy patients.     

Prophylactic lidocaine for postoperative coronary artery bypass patients,a double-blind,randomized trial

This double-blind controlled study examined the frequency of ventricular arrhythmias (premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) greater than 5.min-1, bigeminy, couplets, ventricular tachycardia, and ventricular fibrillation) in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients during the first 24 hr postoperatively to determine the effect of prophylactic lidocaine on reducing the frequency of ventricular arrhythmias. Patients were included in the study if they had undergone CABG only, and had not received treatment for ventricular arrhythmias before coming off cardiopulmonary bypass. A total of 83 patients were studied and were randomly allocated to 43 in the placebo control group and 40 in the lidocaine-treated group. The results showed that 67 per cent of patients in the placebo group and 33 per cent of patients in the lidocaine treated group had ventricular arrhythmias (P less than 0.005). There was also a significant reduction in ventricular fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia in the lidocaine treated group (P less than 0.01). It is recommended that a routine infusion of lidocaine, 100 mg bolus followed by 2 mg.kg-1, be given to every postoperative coronary artery bypass patient for at least the first 24 hours.     

Butorphanol compared with fentanyl in general anaesthesia for ambulatory laparoscopy

Butorphanol was compared with fentanyl as the narcotic component of general anaesthesia for ambulatory laparoscopic surgery. This double-blind, randomized study enrolled 60 healthy women who received equianalgesic doses of fentanyl 1 microgram.kg-1 (F, n = 30) or butorphanol 20 micrograms.kg-1 (B, n = 30) prior to induction of anaesthesia. Tracheal anaesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide/oxygen, isoflurane, and succinylcholine by infusion. Intraoperatively, patients who received B demonstrated lower pulse rate before and after intubation (P less than 0.05, P less than 0.01) and lower diastolic blood pressure after intubation (P less than 0.01). Anesthesiologists judged the maintenance phase as satisfactory more often with B (P less than 0.05). Postoperatively, there were no differences in analgesic need. No major side-effects occurred in either group. Among minor side-effects, patients who received B reported postoperative sedation more often, 77% vs 37% (P less than 0.01), which occurred during the first 45 min of recovery (P less than 0.05). Discharge times were not different. On the first postoperative day, more subjects who received B were satisfied with their anaesthesia experience (P less than 0.05). Butorphanol 20 micrograms.kg-1 is an acceptable alternative analgesic in general anaesthesia for ambulatory laparoscopy.