Suboccipital steroid injections for transitional treatment of patients with more than two cluster headache attacks per day: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Background

Suboccipital steroid injections can be used for preventive treatment of cluster headache but few data are available for the efficacy of this approach in clinical trials. We aimed to assess efficacy and safety of repeated suboccipital injections with cortivazol compared with placebo as add-on therapy in patients having frequent daily attacks.

Methods

In our randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at the Emergency Headache Centre in Paris, France, we enrolled adults aged 18–65 years with more than two cluster headache attacks per day. We randomly allocated patients to receive three suboccipital injections (48–72 h apart) of cortivazol 3·75 mg or placebo, as add-on treatment to oral verapamil in patients with episodic cluster headache and as add-on prophylaxis for those with chronic cluster headache, on the basis of a computer-generated list (blocks of four for each stratum). Injections were done by physicians who were aware of treatment allocation, but patients and the evaluating physician were masked to allocation. The primary outcome was reduction of the number of daily attacks to a mean of two or fewer in the 72 h period 2–4 days after the third injection. We assessed all patients who received at least one dose of study drug in the intention-to-treat analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00804895.

Findings

Between November, 2008, and July, 2009, we randomly allocated 43 patients (15 with chronic and 28 with episodic cluster headache) to receive cortivazol or placebo. 20 of 21 patients who received cortivazol had a mean of two or fewer daily attacks after injections compared with 12 of 22 controls (odds ratio 14·5, 95% CI 1·8–116·9; p=0·012). Patients who received cortivazol also had fewer attacks (mean 10·6, 95% CI 1·4–19·9) in the first 15 days of study than did controls (30·3, 21·4–39·3; mean difference 19·7, 6·8–32·6; p=0·004). We noted no serious adverse events, and 32 (74%) of 43 patients had other adverse events (18 of 21 patients who received cortivazol and 14 of 22 controls; p=0·162); the most common adverse events were injection-site neck pain and non-cluster headache.

Interpretation

Suboccipital cortivazol injections can relieve cluster headaches rapidly in patients having frequent daily attacks, irrespective of type (chronic or episodic). Safety and tolerability need to be confirmed in larger studies.

Funding

None.     

Health disparities in medication adherence between African-Americans and Caucasians with epilepsy

Objective

The goal of this study was to determine whether racial disparities exist with respect to adherence to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in patients with epilepsy.

Method

We reviewed the pharmacy and clinical records of 108 patients with epilepsy who were part of the indigent care program at Shands–Jacksonville. We determined the medication possession ratio (MPR) for each patient and obtained other demographic and clinical variables. Using univariate analysis we determined which variables were associated with the MPR and used multiple linear regression to determine those that best predicted the MPR.

Results

Compared with Caucasians, African-Americans had poorer (lower) MPRs (0.872 for Caucasians vs 0.796 for African-Americans, P = 0.02). Age, gender, high school education, epilepsy classification, seizure freedom, number of AEDs, AED copayment scheme, and number of refills were not significantly affected by race. On stepwise multiple linear regression, race alone best predicted the MPR.

Conclusion

Compared with Caucasians, African-Americans have significantly poorer AED adherence, as measured by the MPR.     

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy in lamotrigine randomized‐controlled trials

Purpose: Nonrandomized studies of the relationship of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) with sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) may be susceptible to confounding by tonic–clonic seizure frequency, polypharmacy, and other potential risk factors for SUDEP. We evaluated the risk of SUDEP with lamotrigine (LTG) compared to active comparators and placebo in randomized controlled clinical trials conducted by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) between 1984 and 2009. Methods: Among 7,774 subjects in 42 randomized clinical trials, there were 39 all‐cause deaths. Ten deaths occurred >2 weeks after discontinuation of study medication and were excluded. Narrative summaries of deaths were independently reviewed by three clinical experts (TT, LH, DF), who were blinded to randomized treatment arm. The risk of definite or probable SUDEP was compared between treatment arms for each trial type (placebo‐controlled, active‐comparator, crossover), using exact statistical methods. Key Findings: Of 29 on‐treatment deaths, eight were definite/probable SUDEP, four were possible SUDEP, and 17 were non‐SUDEP. The overall, unadjusted rate of definite/probable SUDEP for LTG was 2.2 events per 1,000‐patient years (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.70–5.4). The odds ratios (OR) for on‐treatment, definite/probable SUDEP in LTG arms relative to comparator arms, adjusted for length of exposure and trial, were the following: placebo‐controlled, OR 0.22 (95% CI 0.00–3.14; p = 0.26); active‐comparator, OR 2.18 (95% CI 0.17–117; p = 0.89); and placebo‐controlled cross‐over, OR 1.08 (95% CI 0.00–42.2; p = 1.0). Significance: There was no statistically significant difference in rate of SUDEP between LTG and comparator groups. However, the CIs were wide and a clinically important effect cannot be excluded.     

Seizure outcomes of lesionectomy in pediatric lesional epilepsy with brain tumor – Single institute experience

Purpose

To determine the clinical characteristics, surgical strategy, and outcome in pediatric lesional epilepsy patients younger than 5 years of age undergoing surgery in a single institute.

Method

Retrospective data were collected and analyzed on patients younger than 5 years of age who underwent lesionectomy for lesional epilepsy at single institute from January 2001 to August 2010. Fourteen pediatric lesional epilepsy patients were enrolled in this study. Engel classification was used to classify seizure outcome.

Results

Median preoperative seizure period was 1 month (range, 1–21). Median post-operative follow up period was 35 months (range 13–84). Ten patients who underwent gross total resection of tumor showed Engel class Ia seizure outcome without any antiepileptic drug (AED). Subtotal resection was performed in four patients to avoid eloquent area injury. Two of these four patients with subtotal removal became seizure-free (Engel class Ia) without AED, while two were in Engel class Ib with AED medication. There was no significant surgical morbidity or mortality.

Conclusion

Lesionectomy in children younger than 5 years of age is relatively safe and effective in controlling seizures. Short preoperative seizure periods and total removal of tumor might be associated with good outcome. Therefore, early and complete lesionectomy alone may help allow for seizure freedom and optimal brain development in pediatric patients.     

Efficacy of New Antiepileptic Drugs

Regarding efficacy of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) for seizure control, there are three important clinical questions. How effective are new AEDs when corrected for the efficacy of placebo? And even more important: How do new AEDs fare in terms of seizure remission compared with established agents? And finally: Have patients seizure-free on new AEDs a better chance for lasting remission after withdrawal versus those withdrawing from older agents? The answers raise concerns. Although add-on therapy with marketed new AEDs is more effective than placebo, as expected, the treatment difference for becoming seizure-free is disappointingly small (6%; 95% CI: 4–8%; z = 6.47; p < 0.001). Although many, but not all, new AEDs have comparable efficacy to old standard drugs in well-controlled trials, none of the new AEDs is superior to old drugs in terms of seizure remission. So far, we have no antiepileptogenic treatments that prevent the development of epilepsy or modify its detrimental course. The sobering results suggest the need for novel experimental and clinical strategies for the development of more effective new AEDs that interrupt ictogenesis more effectively and prevent or abort epileptogenesis. Ideally, we need new drugs that block both ictogenesis and epileptogenesis, resulting in complete cure of epilepsy.Although a large number of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) that suppress or prevent seizures are now available, about 30 to 40 percent of the patients, children as well as adults, remain resistant to drug treatment (1). The situation is even worse for a range of severe epilepsy syndromes of infancy and adolescence. So far, we have no antiepileptogenic treatments that prevent the development of epilepsy or modify its detrimental course (2). The introduction of each new AED into the market raises valid expectations in patients and physicians for more effective treatment of epilepsy. Although safety, tolerability, and lack of interactions are important, better efficacy is a crucial feature for a new AED. This brief review is limited to a discussion of the efficacy of new versus old AEDs. In that respect, three questions are of particular clinical interest: How effective are new AEDs when corrected for the efficacy of placebo? And even more relevant: Are new AEDs more often leading to seizure remission compared with established agents? And finally: Can more patients maintain seizure remission after withdrawal of new AEDs compared with withdrawal of older agents? The following brief overview, which is not a comprehensive literature review, outlines the available evidence on the efficacy of modern AEDs based on randomized controlled trials of marketed modern AEDs.     

Brainstem lesions may be important in the development of epilepsy in multiple sclerosis patients: An evoked potential study

Objective

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system, with epileptic seizures sometimes observed in the same patients. In this study, we used evoked responses to study the pathogenesis of epilepsy in MS.

Methods

Patients with a diagnosis of definite MS and who had EPs performed (visual (VEP), brainstem auditory (BAEP) and short latency somatosensory (upper (USSEP) and lower (LSSEP))) were retrospectively included in this study. They were divided into three groups; Group I: Patients with no epilepsy and who were not taking anti-epileptic drugs (AED); Group II: Patients with epilepsy and taking AEDs; and Group III: Patients with no epilepsy who were taking AEDs for symptoms related to neuropathic pain.

Results

Three hundred and fifty-five patients were included in this study; Group I: 229 patients (64.5%), Group II: 20 patients (5.6%) and Group III: 106 patients (29.9%). The proportion of patients with abnormal BAEP and USSEP was higher in Group II.

Conclusions

A positive association exists between the presence of epilepsy in MS patients and BAEP and USSEP abnormalities. Analysis of Group III ruled out AED use as a factor.

Significance

Brainstem lesions may be the cause of epileptogenicity in MS.     

Variability of antiepileptic medication taking behaviour in sudden unexplained death in epilepsy: hair analysis at autopsy

BACKGROUND: Variable compliance with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is a potentially preventable cause of sudden unexplained death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Hair AED concentrations provide a retrospective insight into AED intake variability. METHODS: We compared hair AED concentration variability in patients with SUDEP (n = 16), non-SUDEP epilepsy related deaths (n = 9), epilepsy outpatients (n = 31), and epilepsy inpatients (n = 38). AED concentrations were measured in 1 cm hair segments using high performance liquid chromatography. Individual patient hair AED concentration profiles were corrected for "washout" using linear regression analysis. The coefficient of variation (CV) of the corrected mean hair AED concentration provided an index of variability of an individual's AED taking behaviour. Hair sample numbers varied between subjects, and so weighted regression estimates of the CV were derived for each group. RESULTS: The CV regression estimates for each group were: SUDEP 20.5% (standard error 1.9), non-SUDEP 15.0% (3.9), outpatients 9.6% (1.4), and inpatients 6.2% (2.7). The SUDEP group therefore showed greater hair AED concentration variability than either the outpatient or the inpatient groups (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Observed variability of hair AED concentrations, reflecting variable AED ingestion over time, is greater in patients dying from SUDEP than in either epilepsy outpatients or inpatients. SUDEP, at least in a proportion of cases, appears preventable.     

Considerations in prophylaxis for tumor-associated epilepsy: Prevention of status epilepticus and tolerability of newer generation AEDs

Objective

To identify risk factors for the development of tumor-associated epilepsy (TAE) and potential benefit of newer generation AEDs in seizure prevention.

Methods

We performed an IRB approved retrospective study of newly diagnosed GBM patients at the University of Rochester between 1/1/05 and 5/13/11. Records were reviewed to describe demographics, seizure incidence, occurrence of status epilepticus, and AED use and toxicity.

Results

172 patients with newly diagnosed GBM were included in the study. 53.4% developed TAE. 31.4% had seizure prior to diagnosis. 118 patients were seizure-free at diagnosis: 32.2% developed post-diagnosis TIE (PostTAE) and 60.2% remained seizure-free. 70 seizure-free patients received an AED peri-operatively. 36 were weaned off AEDs and 31 were continued. Incidence of PostTAE and time to first seizure were comparable in AED-treated and untreated patients. 4 PostTAE patients presented with status epilepticus (SE), all were not AED treated. AEDs were withdrawn in 10 patients due to toxicity: 9 from phenytoin and 1 from levetiracetam.

Conclusion

There is a high incidence of PostTAE in GBM. Prophylactic AED therapy did not reduce PostTAE but may have prevented SE. Minimal toxicity was observed on 2nd generation AEDs. The high burden of epilepsy in this population and tolerability of newer AEDS suggest that AAN guidelines should be revisited.     

Adverse effects of carbamazepine,phenytoin, valproate and lamotrigine monotherapy in epileptic adult Chinese patients

Objective

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been widely used in patients with epilepsy but the adverse effects in adult Chinese patients have not been investigated. This study evaluated the adverse effects of four commonly prescribed AED monotherapies with carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin (PHT), valproate (VPA), and lamotrigine (LTG) in adult Chinese patients with epilepsy.

Methods

The prospective open-label clinical trial was conducted at the Chongqing Epilepsy Center. The study enrolled 505 adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy, including generalized tonic–clonic (n = 110), partial and partial secondarily generalized (n = 395) seizures. Patients were evaluated by two clinicians at the Center and were prescribed one type of AED monotherapy with CBZ, PHT, VPA or LTG for a 24-month period. An adverse effect profile, as well as efficacy of monotherapy, was obtained through a face-to-face interview with the patient at each visit. A physical examination and routine laboratory tests were performed during a clinical screening.

Results

A total of 62.6% (316/505) patients successfully completed the AED monotherapy study: 64.3% of those receiving CBZ, 55.9%—PHT, 61.5%—VPA, and 66.2%—LTG. However, 34.7% of the patients discontinued the AED monotherapy because of unsatisfactory seizure control. Overall, 18% of patients experienced adverse effects: for CBZ (25/168; 14.9%), PHT (18/59; 30.5%), VPA (32/192; 16.7%) and LTG (16/86; 18.6%). The most common drug-related adverse events included gastrointestinal disturbances, loss of appetite and nausea, weight gain and fatigue/tiredness. Tremor and nystagmus occurred in some patients receiving PHT and VPA. Two CBZ, one PHT and four LTG patients (n = 7) discontinued the study due to rash.

Conclusion

Adult Chinese patients with epilepsy accepted and tolerated monotherapy with CBZ, PHT, VPA, and LTG. No fatal adverse events occurred. Unsatisfactory seizure control was a primary reason for withdrawal from the AED monotherapy study.     

Mortality in isodicentric chromosome 15 syndrome: The role of SUDEP

PurposeTo ascertain the cause of mortality and incidence of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) in patients with supernumerary isodicentric chromosome 15 (idic15).MethodsCases were obtained from those reported to the Dup15q Alliance (www.dup15q.org) between April 2006 and June 2012; ~ 709 families were registered in their database. We performed a case–control study comparing reported SUDEP cases to living patients with epilepsy from the Dup15q Alliance registry who volunteered to be interviewed to examine clinical risk factors.Key findingsThere were nineteen deaths with idic15; 17 had epilepsy, and nine deaths were due to probable or definite SUDEP (4 females, median age of death was 13.5 years, range: 3–26 years). Possible SUDEP occurred in 2 others. The remainder died from status epilepticus (3), pneumonia (3), aspiration (1), and drowning (1). Nonambulatory status and lack of seizure control were more common among SUDEP cases than living dup15q patients.SignificanceOur findings suggest that SUDEP is a common cause of death among children and young adults with isodicentric chromosome 15q11.2q13 duplications and patients with the most severe neurologic dysfunction may be at highest risk. Further studies are needed to examine if this specific genetic defect plays a role in the mechanism of SUDEP in these patients.     

Comparison of antiepileptic drug levels in sudden unexpected deaths in epilepsy with deaths from other causes

PURPOSE: (a) To compare postmortem antiepileptic drug (AED) levels in patients with sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) with those in a control group of subjects with epilepsy. If SUDEP patients more frequently had undetectable or subtherapeutic AED levels, this would suggest that compliance with AED treatment is poorer in this group and that poor compliance is a risk factor for SUDEP. (b) To determine whether a particular AED was detected more commonly in the SUDEP group, suggesting that this AED is associated with a higher risk of SUDEP. METHODS: A retrospective study of coronial cases was performed. Postmortem AED levels in 44 SUDEP cases and 44 control cases were compared. The control group consisted of epileptics who died of causes other than epilepsy, including natural disease (e.g., ischemic heart disease, accidents, and suicide). The AEDs measured included carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin, (PHT), valproate (VPA), phenobarbitone (PB), lamotrigine (LTG), clonazepam (CZP), and clobazam (CLB). The number of SUDEP and control cases in which CBZ only was detected were compared, as were the number in which PHT only was detected. RESULTS: Compared with the controls, the SUDEP group showed no difference in the number with no detectable AEDs (13 vs. 11), the number with subtherapeutic AEDs (10 vs. 13), and the number with therapeutic levels (21 in both groups). CBZ only was detected in 11 SUDEPs and 11 controls, and PHT only in five SUDEPs and 10 controls. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests the SUDEP group were no less compliant with AED treatment than the control group. This study does not support the hypothesis that poor compliance with AED treatment is a risk factor for SUDEP. There was no evidence that PHT or CBZ is associated with a higher risk of SUDEP.     

DWI-FLAIR mismatch for the identification of patients with acute ischaemic stroke within 4·5 h of symptom onset (PRE-FLAIR): a multicentre observational study

Background

Many patients with stroke are precluded from thrombolysis treatment because the time from onset of their symptoms is unknown. We aimed to test whether a mismatch in visibility of an acute ischaemic lesion between diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI (DWI-FLAIR mismatch) can be used to detect patients within the recommended time window for thrombolysis.

Methods

In this multicentre observational study, we analysed clinical and MRI data from patients presenting between Jan 1, 2001, and May 31, 2009, with acute stroke for whom DWI and FLAIR were done within 12 h of observed symptom onset. Two neurologists masked to clinical data judged the visibility of acute ischaemic lesions on DWI and FLAIR imaging, and DWI-FLAIR mismatch was diagnosed by consensus. We calculated predictive values of DWI-FLAIR mismatch for the identification of patients with symptom onset within 4·5 h and within 6 h and did multivariate regression analysis to identify potential confounding covariates. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01021319.

Findings

The final analysis included 543 patients. Mean age was 66·0 years (95% CI 64·7–67·3) and median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 8 (IQR 4–15). Acute ischaemic lesions were identified on DWI in 516 patients (95%) and on FLAIR in 271 patients (50%). Interobserver agreement for acute ischaemic lesion visibility on FLAIR imaging was moderate (κ=0·569, 95% CI 0·504–0·634). DWI-FLAIR mismatch identified patients within 4·5 h of symptom onset with 62% (95% CI 57–67) sensitivity, 78% (72–84) specificity, 83% (79–88) positive predictive value, and 54% (48–60) negative predictive value. Multivariate regression analysis identified a longer time to MRI (p<0·0001), a lower age (p=0·0009), and a larger DWI lesion volume (p=0·0226) as independent predictors of lesion visibility on FLAIR imaging.

Interpretation

Patients with an acute ischaemic lesion detected with DWI but not with FLAIR imaging are likely to be within a time window for which thrombolysis is safe and effective. These findings lend support to the use of DWI-FLAIR mismatch for selection of patients in a future randomised trial of thrombolysis in patients with unknown time of symptom onset.

Funding

Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung, National Institutes of Health.     

United States Perspective on Definitions and Classifications

Summary: Interest in sudden unexpected and unexplained death in individuals with epilepsy (SUDEP) was rekindled in the United States by Jay and Leestma during the early 1980s and more recently by antiepileptic drug (AED) trials and medicolegal issues. The incidence of SUDEP has been and is being evaluated in North America and the United Kingdom. Specific criteria for the classification of definite, probable, possible, and unlikely SUDEP implemented in United States epidemiologic studies are presented. Evidence for the increased relative risk for sudden death in epilepsy compared with the general population is also discussed.     

Long-term outcome of epilepsy in Kabuki syndrome

Purposes and methods

Kabuki syndrome (KS) is a rare dysmorphic disorder characterized by multiple congenital anomalies and mental retardation. Although epilepsy is one of the most common clinical complications associated with KS, few studies have evaluated its electroclinical aspects and long-term outcome. Therefore, we describe here a clinical series of 10 Caucasian KS patients who developed epilepsy in childhood. We followed all children for at least 5 years.

Results

All patients presented partial seizures and interictal EEGs revealed focal epileptic paroxysms with prevalent involvement of temporo-occipital areas. Seven children had no central nervous system abnormalities, but enlargement of lateral ventricles, corpus callosum hypoplasia, and adenohypophysis hypoplasia were revealed in three. Although antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment was effective in controlling seizures and normalizing EEG abnormalities in 8 patients, the other 2 cases were resistant to multiple AEDs. In one of these two patients, withdrawal of AED resulted in status epilepticus and death.

Conclusions

Partial seizures and temporo-occipital abnormalities on interictal EEG are common features of KS patients who suffer from epilepsy. Prognosis of this epilepsy is favourable in the majority of cases with complete disappearance of seizures and EEG abnormalities.     

SUDEP in the Netherlands: a retrospective study in a tertiary referral center.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate risk factors for sudden and unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) in a high-risk population, i.e. patients treated in a Dutch tertiary referral center for epilepsy. METHODS: All patients who died between January 1999 and April 2004 while under treatment of the epilepsy center were identified. Based on clinical data, deaths were classified as definite, probable, possible or non-SUDEP. Potential risk factors were compared in SUDEP cases and non-SUDEP cases. RESULTS: SUDEP incidence was 1.24 per 1000 patient years. SUDEP patients died at a younger age than patients from the control group of non-SUDEP deaths with epilepsy and had an earlier onset of epilepsy. However, the frequently mentioned factors in previous studies, i.e. male sex, generalized tonic-clonic seizures, high seizure frequency, specific AEDs, polytherapy with several AEDs, mental retardation, psychiatric illness and psychotropic comedication, were not found to be correlated with SUDEP. CONCLUSIONS: Even in this high-risk population of patients with refractory epilepsy, treated in a tertiary referral center, SUDEP is not a frequently occurring phenomenon. Specific risk factors could not be identified within an already high-risk population.     

Development of an electronic decision tool to support appropriate treatment choice in adult patients with epilepsy - Epi-Scope

Background

Given the continuous knowledge progression and the growing number of available antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), making appropriate treatment choices for patients with epilepsy is increasingly difficult. While published guidelines help for separate clinical aspects, patients with a combination of specific characteristics may escape proper guidance. This study aimed to determine the appropriateness of AEDs for particular clinical variables and to offer treatment recommendations for adult patients with epilepsy in a user-friendly format for practicing neurologists.

Methods

Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, the appropriateness of AEDs as initial/second mono-therapy and combination therapy was assessed in relation to selected clinical variables by a Belgian panel of 13 experts in epilepsy. Panel recommendations for particular patient profiles were determined by the outcome of these separate ratings.

Results

The appropriateness outcome of individual AEDs was not substantially different between first and second mono-therapy; valproate was considered appropriate for all types of generalised and partial seizures. The outcome for combination therapy was highly dependent on the type of AED and seizures. With respect to co-morbidities and co-treatments, levetiracetam and pregabalin proved to have the least contra-indications. For the elderly and with respect to factors related to the female reproductive system the appropriateness of AEDs showed a more diffuse pattern. Although caution was deemed necessary for some combinations, the AEDs were never considered inappropriate regarding their drug interaction profile.

Conclusions

The Epi-Scope^® tool that displays appropriateness recommendations for highly specific, possibly complex cases, supports optimal treatment choices for adult patients with epilepsy in daily practice.     

Antiepileptic drug use during pregnancy: Perinatal outcomes

Purpose

This study was undertaken to (1) measure the frequency of AED monotherapy or polytherapy during pregnancy and AED discontinuation prior to pregnancy in a cohort of women with treated epilepsy; and (2) describe the frequency of major congenital malformations according to maternal use of AED during pregnancy.

Methods

A cohort of epileptic pregnant women was identified within the Quebec Pregnancy Registry and was divided into three groups based on maternal AED use during pregnancy: AED monotherapy, AED polytherapy and no AED use.

Results

Of the 349 pregnancies meeting eligibility criteria, 79.6% were exposed to AED monotherapy and 5.8% to polytherapy during pregnancy; 14.6% discontinued AED prior to pregnancy. The most commonly used AEDs were carbamazepine (29.9%) and valproic acid (19.7%); the most common AED polytherapy combination was carbamazepine combined with clobazam (2.5%). Of 111 deliveries in the group of women on monotherapy during pregnancy, 9.9% (n = 11) were born with major congenital malformations; in the group of women treated with polytherapy, 19.0% (n = 8 over 42) of babies had major congenital malformations compared to 20.0% in women who discontinued AEDs prior to pregnancy.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that the majority of women suffering from epilepsy were treated with monotherapy rather than polytherapy during pregnancy. While most used other agents, an important number of women continued to use valproate in pregnancy despite the long standing evidence of its teratogenicity and increasing evidence of its neuro-toxicity to the fetus.     

Forensic antiepileptic drug levels in autopsy cases of epilepsy

A 1-year retrospective coroner-based forensic examination of causes of death among persons with a history of epilepsy was conducted at the Allegheny County Coroner's Office to evaluate the phenomenon of sudden unexplained/unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP), a diagnosis of exclusion. All cases at the Coroner's Office from January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001, were examined. Review of a total of 1200 autopsied deaths revealed 12 cases with a past medical history of seizure disorder on the death certificate, which listed seizure disorder as the immediate cause of death or contributory cause of the death. Of the 7 men with seizure disorders, 5 were categorized as definite SUDEP and 2 as possible SUDEP. Of the 5 women with seizure disorders, 2 were listed as definite SUDEP, 2 as possible, and 1 as non-SUDEP because the convulsive seizures developed from a grade II glial tumor. Postmortem findings were evaluated for 11 cases; 1 body was decomposed. Toxicological screens were carried out on blood, bile, urine, and eye fluid for all 12. Antiepileptic drug (AED) levels detected in postmortem toxicological analysis were examined. AED levels were determined in 7 cases. Four of 7 had subtherapeutic AED levels, 2 had therapeutic levels, and only 1 victim of SUDEP had levels above the therapeutic range. Five cases had no detectable AED levels. AED levels at autopsy were either absent or subtherapeutic in 9 of 10 SUDEP cases, findings consistent with the likelihood of poor AED compliance. Subtherapeutic levels of AEDs may be a risk factor for SUDEP that could contribute to increased interictal and/or ictal epileptiform activity with associated autonomic dysfunction leading to disturbance of heart rate, heart rhythm, and/or blood pressure.