Intravitreal anti-VEGF monotherapy for thick submacular hemorrhage of less than 1 week duration secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Aim:

To investigate the role of anti-VEGF monotherapy in patients with thick submacular hemorrhage (SMH) of ≤1 week duration secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (N-AMD).

Materials and Methods:

A retrospective chart review of 14 eyes of 14 patients presenting with acute decrease in central vision of ≤1 week duration secondary to a thick SMH measuring ≥ 2 MPS disk areas from N-AMD was performed. Intravitreal injections of bevacizumab 1.25 mg (13 eyes) or ranibizumab 0.5 mg (1 eye) were given monthly until resolution of SMH and less frequently thereafter, based on treat-and-extend approach utilizing spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT). Patients with follow-up of ≥6 months were included.

Results:

Patients presented after a median of 4 (range 1-7) days from the onset of SMH. Mean lesion size was 27.9 mm² (range 5.47-100, median 15), with blood comprising 77-98% of the lesion. Presenting visual acuity (VA) ranged from 20/60 to hand motions (median 20/200). Patients received a mean of 11.4 (range 5-20) injections over 18.4 (range 7-50) months. SMH resolved in all eyes in a mean of 4.8 (range 2-8) months. At 6 months follow-up, mean VA gain was −0.54 logMAR (range: −1.5 to +1, Snellen range 20/25-20/400, median 20/100, P = 0.0037), with 11 gaining ≥0.2 logMAR. Mean change in VA from baseline at final follow-up was −0.58 logMAR (range −1.6 to +1, Snellen range 20/30-20/400, median 20/60; P = 0.0022).

Conclusion:

A good anatomical and visual outcome can be accomplished in patients with thick SMH secondary to N-AMD treated with anti-VEGF monotherapy within 1 week.     

Bevacizumab versus ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration:a Meta-analysis

AIM: To systematically compare the efficacy and safety of off-label bevacizumab versus licensed ranibizumab intravitreal injections as well as monthly regimen versus pro re nata [PRN (as needed)] regimen in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). METHODS: Relevant publications were identified through automatically retrieve of database and manually retrieving. The methodological quality of studies included was assessed using the Jadad score and the risk-of-bias assessment. The efficacy estimates were measured by the weight mean difference (WMD) for the improvement of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) reduction. The safety estimates were measured by odds ratios (OR) for adverse events rates. Statistical analysis was conducted by Revman 5.2.7. RESULTS: Seven studies were included in the Meta-analysis. There were no statistically significant differences between bevacizumab and ranibizumab in BCVA at 1 and 2y (P=0.37, P=0.18, respectively), However, both drugs has better BCVA given monthly than given as needed at 1 and 2y (P<0.05). The results demonstrated the mean decrease in CRT was less in bevacizumab group than ranibizumab group at 1y (P<0.05), while the difference was not significant at 2y (P=0.24). Treatment monthly gained much more decrease in CRT at 1 and 2y (P<0.005). There were no differences between drugs in the rates of death, arterial thrombotic events and venous thrombotic events (P=0.41, P=0.55, P=0.10, respectively), while the rates of medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDAR) system organ class events and ≥1 systemic serious adverse events were higher in bevacizumab group than ranibizumab group (P<0.05). But the incidences of death, arterial thrombotic events, venous thrombotic events, MedDAR system organ class events as well as ≥1 systemic serious adverse events were not statistically different between both treatment regimens of monthly and as needed (P=0.14, P=0.76, P=0.73, P=0.12, P=0.11, respectively). CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab was equivalent to ranibizumab for BCVA, however bevacizumab tended to gain less decrease in CRT and had higher rates of serious adverse events. Compared with treatment as needed, treatment monthly showed superior efficacy in BCVA improvement and CRT reduction, while the rates of adverse events were similar in the two dosing regimens.     

Intravitreal aflibercept in neovascular age-related macular degeneration previously treated with ranibizumab

AIM: To report the change in visual acuity and central macular thickness (CMT) following treatment with intravitreal aflibercept injections in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) with suboptimum response to ranibizumab. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. The inclusion criteria were patients with nAMD who responded poorly to ranibizumab. Patients then received either 3 consecutive aflibercept injections followed by PRN treatment or PRN alone. Primary endpoints were mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and CMT at 12mo. Secondary endpoints were number of injections and adverse events. RESULTS: Forty-nine eyes from 49 patients met the inclusion criteria and completed 12-month follow up on aflibercept. Thirty-eight eyes received 3 consecutive aflibercept injections followed by PRN treatment and 11 eyes received pro re nata (PRN) injections alone. At 12mo, mean BCVA improved by one letters (logMAR 0.56±0.31 to 0.54±0.34) and mean CMT decreased from 303.9±82.1 to 259.2±108.3 µm. Four percent of eyes gained 15 letters or more, 6% lost more than 15 letters and the remaining 90% had stable BCVA. The mean number of aflibercept injections was 6. There was one case of infectious endophthalmitis. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal aflibercept in patients with nAMD with a previous suboptimal response to ranibizumab resulted in an anatomical improvement in macular appearance at 12mo without a corresponding improvement in visual acuity.     

Predictors of anti-VEGF treatment response in neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Currently available evidence on predictors of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment response in neovascular age-related macular degeneration was reviewed. No meta-analysis of results is possible because of a lack of controlled and randomized trials, varying treatment regimes and outcome measures used, as well as suboptimal reporting. For genetic factors, most evidence to date has been generated for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the complement factor H (CFH), and VEGF-A genes. Just under half of the SNPs assessed in the CFH gene and 15% of the SNPs assessed in the VEGF gene were found to be associated with visual outcomes or the number of injections required during follow-up. Some evidence suggests association of worse treatment outcomes as well as a younger age at treatment onset with an increasing number of risk alleles in known risk genes (CFH and ARMS2/HTRA1) and polymorphisms in the VEGF-A gene. Clinical factors such as higher age, a better visual acuity (VA), a larger choroidal neovascularization (CNV) lesion at baseline, and a delay between symptom onset and initiation of treatment of more than 3 weeks also impact outcomes. Conversely, a worse acuity at baseline predicted more gain in vision. Overall, patients presenting with good acuity at baseline were more likely to have good VA at follow up, but the gain afforded by treatment was impacted by a ceiling effect. Most available evidence suggests a strong association of clinical factors such as age, baseline VA, and CNV lesion size with anti-VEGF treatment outcomes. No behavioral factors such as smoking influence treatment outcomes. Based on the studies conducted so far, the evidence suggests that underlying genotype of known AMD risk associated genes or of the VEGF-A gene have a limited effect, whereas presenting clinical factors appear to be more important in determining treatment outcomes.     

Rescue effects of intravitreal aflibercept in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration

We report the rescue results of intravitreal aflibercept in patients with treatment-resistant neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). We retrospectively analyzed eyes with neovascular AMD resistant to posterior subtenon triamcinolone, intravitreal ranibizumab, and/or bevacizumab treatment in a tertiary medical center in middle Taiwan between December 2013 and October 2014. We then switched treatment to 2.0 mg aflibercept. The main outcome included changes in best-corrected visual acuity and central foveal thickness measured by optical coherence tomography during monthly follow-up. There were 204 patients with neovascular AMD, and the percentage of refractory cases was 1.96% (4 of 204 cases). Our study included five eyes of four patients that were resistant to multiple treatments and subsequently switched to aflibercept. The mean age was 71.25 ± 11.09 years (range 57–83 years). Treatments were on average 6.6 times previously. Upon switching to aflibercept treatment, the average central foveal thickness on optical coherence tomography was 505.6 ± 270.86 μm (range 150–815 μm). After aflibercept treatment, the average central foveal thickness was 192 ± 51.76 μm (range 149–274 μm). All patients showed anatomic improvement, and 80% of the eyes (4 of 5 eyes) had improved best-corrected visual acuity and 20% of the eyes (1 of 5 eyes) had stable visual acuity. Patients tolerated the treatment well without serious adverse events. This short-term study showed that intravitreal aflibercept was effective and safe in treatment-resistant neovascular AMD cases. However, analysis of more cases and long-term follow-ups are mandatory.     

两种抗VEGF药物治疗渗出性年龄相关性黄斑病变的疗效

目的：观察雷珠单抗和康柏西普治疗湿性年龄相关性黄斑变性的临床疗效。方法：回顾性病例系列研究。分析30例30眼雷珠单抗玻璃体腔注射0．5 mg每月1次,连续3次治疗湿性老年黄斑变性的病例和28例30眼康柏西普玻璃体腔注射0．5 mg每月1次,连续3次治疗湿性老年黄斑变性的病例,比较两组分别在玻璃体腔注药1 mo后的最佳矫正视力及OCT变化情况。结果：连续3次玻璃体腔注药,每次治疗后1 mo与治疗前相比,A 组 BCVA 平均值提高,CMT平均值降低,差异具有统计学意义（ P＜0．05）; B组BCVA 平均值提高, CMT平均值亦降低,差异具有统计学意义（P＜0．05）,两组间比较BCVA 变化、CMT变化差异不具有统计学意义（ P＞0．05）。结论：雷珠单抗和康柏西普治疗均能有效控制湿性AMD患者病情发展并改善视力,治疗3 mo内两种药物疗效的比较无统计学意义。     

Influence of seasonal sunlight intensity and iris color on the anti-VEGF therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Purpose

To investigate the influence of seasonal light intensity and patients'' iris color on the visual recovery after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy with ranibizumab or bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Methods

The visual acuity of 555 eyes (529 patients) with neovascular AMD was evaluated after intravitreal injections of either ranibizumab or bevacizumab in respect to global radiation intensity and iris color.

Results

The functional results during anti-VEGF therapy revealed a seasonal oscillation with a negative correlation between visual recovery and global radiation intensity (R²=−0.756, P=0.004). Although the influence of the sunlight intensity on the visual recovery was significant after the first injection, this effect vanished within the continuous course of treatment. Regarding the improvement of functional recovery depending on iris color, dark-colored eyes (16.0%) gained 8.5±10.0 letters after the first injection and 9.9±12.8 letters after the second injection, compared with 3.4±8.6 letters and 4.4±11.0 letters in light-colored eyes (84.0%), respectively (P=0.005 and P=0.019).

Conclusions

Our results indicate that seasonal sunlight intensity and iris color might influence the visual recovery of neovascular AMD patients undergoing anti-VEGF therapy. Our findings may be used as suggestions to refine individual anti-VEGF therapy regimens, especially in patients with light-colored eyes.     

6-weekly bevacizumab versus 4-weekly ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a 2-year outcome

AIM: To compare visual acuity and central macular thickness (CMT) changes in neovascular age related macular degeneration patients treated with either 6 weekly bevacizumab regimen or 4 weekly ranibizumab on an as required basis. METHODS: Patients made an informed choice between bevacizumab 1.25 mg or ranibizumab 0.5 mg. The selected treatment was administered in the first 3 visits. Bevacizumab patients were followed-up 6 weekly and ranibizumab 4 weekly. Retreatment criteria was based on the reduction of >5 letters in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), the presence of retinal fluid on optical coherence tomography (OCT) or new retinal haemorrhage. RESULTS: Visual acuity at 2y bevacizumab patients gained 7.0 letters and ranibizumab 9.2 (P=0.31, 95% CI -6.4 to 2.0). At 2y 86% of bevacizumab and 94% ranibizumab patients had not lost 15 letters or more (P=0.13). Mean CMT decreased at 2y bevacizumab by 146 µm, ranibizumab 160 µm (P=0.72). Mean number of injections was at 2y bevacizumzb 11.9, ranibizumab 10.3 (P=0.023). CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab 6 weekly on an as required basis was not demonstrably non-inferior to ranibizumab 4 weekly pro re nata (prn) in terms of BCVA and change in CMT. In the bevacizumab group, one more injection was required in the second year compared to the ranibizumab group.     

Assessment of the long-term visual and anatomical outcomes of ranibizumab to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration

AIM: To investigate the long-term visual and anatomical outcomes of patients who underwent intravitreal ranibizumab monotherapy to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and followed-up for at least 2y. METHODS: A total of 74 eyes of 74 patients who underwent ranibizumab monotherapy for neovascular AMD were included in this retrospective study. RESULTS: The average patient age was 72.1±6.5 (range, 57-85)y, the average follow-up time 46.2±13.1 (range, 24-75)mo, and the average number of visits 24.1±9.5 (range, 8-48). The mean number of injections in year 1 was 4.5, 1.6 in year 2, 0.9 in year 3, 0.4 on year 4, and 0.1 in the following years. Within the entire follow-up period, the mean number of injections was 7.6±4.4 (range, 2-21). The mean visual acuity was 48.1±15 (range, 15-76) letters at baseline and 45.7±19 (range, 7-75) at year 5. The mean central macular thickness was 303±78 (range, 178-552) μm at baseline and 251±51 (range, 138-359) μm at year 5. Scars developed in 47 (63.5%) eyes at the end of the follow-up period, and atrophy was evident in 6 (8.1%) eyes. CONCLUSION: Ranibizumab monotherapy can stabilize visual acuity for a mean period of 4y in patients with neovascular AMD.     

比较雷珠单抗和贝伐珠单抗对新生血管AMD的疗效

目的：比较玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗与贝伐珠单抗对年龄相关性黄斑变性（ age-related macular degeneration, AMD）的疗效,治疗方案必要时采用。 方法：回顾性分析63例63眼（雷珠单抗治疗组35眼,贝伐珠单抗治疗组28眼）新确诊新生血管年龄相关性黄斑变性患者的资料。治疗12 mo后随访,分析比较两组患者的最佳矫正视力（ BCVA）和黄斑中心凹厚度（ CFT）。采用双尾t检验和单因素方差分析比较两组最佳矫正视力和黄斑中心凹厚度的变化。 结果：雷珠单抗治疗组35眼和贝伐珠单抗治疗组28眼均完成12 mo随访,并记录数据。雷珠单抗治疗组最佳矫正视力均值增加0.1 logMAR;相反,贝伐珠单抗治疗组最佳矫正视力均值下降0.06logMAR（P=0.01）。雷珠单抗治疗组13眼（37%）和贝伐珠单抗治疗组4眼（14%）最佳矫正视力至少增加0.3logMAR。雷珠单抗治疗组平均黄斑中心凹厚度减少41.6μm,贝伐珠单抗治疗组减少8.1μm（P=0.003）。两组平均注射次数是4.46次和4.11次（P〉0.05）。 结论：玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗组在视力和消水肿方面疗效优于贝伐珠单抗组。但是,两种药的疗效和安全性还需要随机的长期临床试验来验证。     

新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者玻璃体内注射抗血管内皮生长因子药物治疗进展

年龄相关性黄斑变性是引起50岁以上人群视力不可逆性损伤的主要原因之一，新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性（neovascular age-related macular degeneration,nAMD）也称湿性年龄相关性黄斑变性（wet age-related macular degeneration,wAMD），是其晚期阶段，可导致最严重的视力丧失。血管内皮生长因子（vascular endothelial growth factor,VEGF）是脉络膜新生血管和视网膜渗漏形成的主要因素，抗VEGF治疗是目前唯一实现多数患者视力改善并且停止疾病进展的治疗方法，因此玻璃体内注射抗VEGF药物已经成为wAMD一线治疗方法。用于临床治疗wAMD的抗VEGF药物主要有哌加他尼、贝伐单抗、雷珠单抗、阿柏西普和康柏西普。治疗方案有固定式、按需式以及治疗和延长式治疗方案。Brolucizumab和abicipar pegol是2种新的抗VEGF药物，正处于3期临床试验阶段。本文对以上药物治疗wAMD的研究进展进行综述。     

Influence of pigment epithelial detachment on visual acuity in neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Pigment epithelial detachment (PED), the anatomical separation of the retinal pigment epithelium from the Bruch membrane, is common in many chorioretinal diseases, including neovascular age-related macular degeneration. PED is present in about 30% to 80% of neovascular age-related macular degeneration patients based on the CATT, EXCITE, and VIEW studies. The influence of PED on visual acuity is controversial as a result of inconsistent results reported by various studies. With advances in imaging technologies, it is possible to evaluate not only the presence or absence of PED, but also detailed quantitative parameters, such as height, width, greatest linear diameter, area, volume, and reflectivity within the PED. We performed a comprehensive literature review to evaluate the relationship of PED with visual acuity. In summary, the presence or persistence of a PED may still be compatible with relatively good visual acuity. There is no strong evidence that the presence of a PED or aspects of its morphology has a significant impact on visual acuity. The presence of a PED may be predictive of the need for more regular treatment. More well-designed studies with standardized PED definitions and classifications are needed to evaluate the relationship between PED and visual acuity.     

Comparison of visual acuity outcomes between ranibizumab and bevacizumab treatment in neovascular age-related macular degeneration

AIM: To compare visual acuity (VA) outcomes between intravitreal injection of bevacizumab and ranibizumab in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: We conducted a consecutive, retrospective case series study in patients with newly diagnosed all type choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to AMD who received an intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (1.25mg) or ranibizumab (0.3mg) at Lions Eye Institute, Western Australia from Mar. 2006 to May 2008. All patients received injection at baseline with additional monthly injections given at the discretion of the treating physician. Main outcome measures were changes in VA. RESULTS: There were 371 consecutive patients received injection at least in one eye with at least 6 months of follow up (median of 12.0 months). Bevacizumab treatment prevented 221 out of 278 (79.5%) patients from losing < 15 letters in VA compared with 79 out of 93 (84.9%) of ranibizumab treated patients (P=0.25). While 68 (24.5%) of bevacizumab treated patients gained ≥15 letters of VA compared with 24 (25.8%) of ranibizumab treated patients (P=0.79). 75.3% and 66.2% patients benefited from ranibizumab and bevacizumab respectively with final VA better than 6/60 (P=0.10). Multivariate analysis showed that pre-treatment VA was negatively associated with benefit outcome. Assignment of injection was not associated with VA outcome of benefit after adjusting the covariate (P=0.857). CONCLUSION: There are no difference in treatment efficacy in terms of VA between bevacizumab and ranibizumab in routine clinical condition.     

Comparison of bevacizumab and ranibizumab in age-related macular degeneration:a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM: To compare the effectiveness and safety between bevacizumab and ranibizumab in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.METHODS:We performed a comprehensive search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, case-control and cohort studies that compared bevacizumab and ranibizumab using PubMed and the Cochrane Library. After the related data were extracted by two investigators independently, pooled weighted mean differences (WMDs) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a random-effects or a fixed-effects model.RESULTS:A total of four RCTs involving 1927 patients and eleven retrospective case series involving 2296 patients were included. For the primary outcomes, no significant differences were found between ranibizumab group and bevacizumab group in visual acuity (WMD:-0.04; 95%CI:-0.08 to 0.00; P=0.06), best corrected visual acuity (WMD:-0.05; 95%CI:-0.10 to 0.00; P=0.05), retina thickness (WMD:-4.69; 95%CI:-13.15 to 3.76; P=0.86) and foveal thickness (WMD:10.91; 95%CI:-14.73 to 36.56; P=0.40). The pooled analyses in the evaluation of safety showed that compared to bevacizumab, ranibizumab was associated with decreased risks of ocular inflammation (RR:0.45; 95% CI:0.23 to 0.89; P=0.02) and venous thrombotic events (RR:0.27; 95%CI:0.08 to 0.89; P=0.03). However, there were no significant differences observed in deaths (P=0.69) and arterial thromboembolic events (P=0.71) between the two groups.CONCLUSION:With equal clinical efficacy, ranibizumab was found to be associated with less adverse events compared to bevacizumab, indicating that ranibizumab might be a safer management.     

Bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration in Chinese patients in a clinical setting

AIM: To determine the outcome of non-investigational treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 81 eyes with neovascular AMD followed-up for at least 12mo and received 3-monthly loading IVB injections. Re-treat was based upon the individual clinician’s judgment. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography measurements of central foveal thickness outcomes were evaluated at 12, 24mo. RESULTS: Eighty-one eyes (of 75 patients) completed 12mo of follow-up and 44 eyes (of 41 patients) completed 24mo of follow-up. The mean baseline logMAR BCVA significantly improved from 0.94±0.69 to 0.85±0.68 at 12mo (P<0.001) and from 0.91±0.65 to 0.85±0.60 (P=0.004) at 24mo. The proportion of eyes that lost <15 logMAR letters at 12mo was 90.1% and at 24mo was 81.8%. IVB was effective in improving visual acuity in both treatment naïve and previous photodynamic therapy (PDT)-treated subgroups. Treatment naive patients required significantly fewer injections than patients with prior PDT. Multiple regression analysis identified that poorer baseline visual acuity was associated with greater improvement in visual acuity (P=0.015). CONCLUSION: Fewer injections in clinical practice may result in suboptimal visual outcomes compared with clinical trials of IVB in neovascular AMD patients. Poor baseline visual acuity and prior PDT treatment may also improve vision after IVB. The safety and durability of effect was maintained at 24mo.     

Volumetric fluid analysis of fixed monthly anti-VEGF treatment in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration

AIM: To evaluate visual outcomes and changes in fluid after administering monthly anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) with subretinal fluid (SRF) and pigment epithelial detachment (PED). METHODS: This prospective study included eyes with nAMD previously treated with as-needed anti-VEGF injections. The patients were treated with six monthly intravitreal injections of ranibizumab. Quantitative volumetric segmentation analyses of the SRF and PED were performed. The main outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and SRF and PED volumes. RESULTS: Twenty eyes of 20 patients were included in this study. At the 6-month follow-up, BCVA and PED volume did not change significantly (P=0.110 and 0.999, respectively) but the mean SRF volume decreased from 0.53±0.82 mm3 at baseline to 0.08±0.23 mm3 (P=0.002). The absorption rate of the SRF volume was negatively correlated with the duration of previous anti-VEGF treatment (P=0.029). Seven of the 20 eyes (35%) showed a fluid-free macula and significant improvement in BCVA (P=0.036) by month 6. CONCLUSION: Quantifying the SRF can precisely determine the patient’s responsiveness to anti-VEGF treatment of nAMD.     

Rapid response to intravitreal aflibercept in neovascular age-related macular degeneration after development of tachyphylaxis to bevacizumab and ranibizumab

This article reports a rapid response of intravitreal aflibercept for the treatment of a case of neovascular age-related macular degeneration that developed tachyphylaxis to bevacizumab and ranibizumab. An 80-year-old man with neovascular age-related macular degeneration became unresponsive to monthly treatment with bevacizumab or ranibizumab after initial responsiveness, to as-needed treatment with these antivascular endothelial growth factor drugs for 49 months. Subretinal fluid and pigment epithelial detachment had sustained in spite of 14 bevacizumab and seven ranibizumab injections prior to intravitreal aflibercept treatment. After only one injection of intravitreal aflibercept, a marked improvement was seen within 1 week. Complete drying of subretinal fluid and marked subsidence of pigment epithelial detachment were noted 4 weeks after the first aflibercept injection and sustained for three consecutive monthly injections. This case reveals that shifting to aflibercept may be an effective alternative treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration that becomes tachyphylactic to bevacizumab or ranibizumab.     

Quality of fixation in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with ranibizumab

Aims

To define factors that determine the location and stability of fixation in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NV-AMD) treated with intravitreal ranibizumab injections.

Methods

The location and stability of fixation using microperimetry were determined in 77 eyes treated with ranibizumab for NV-AMD for at least 12 months. All patients were treated with three injections of ranibizumab 0.5 mg, 1 month apart and retreated according to predefined criteria. The fixation parameters were correlated to the visual acuity, and quantitative measures on OCT.

Results

The location of fixation was predominantly central in 52.6%, poor central fixation in 9.2%, and predominantly eccentric fixation in 38.2%. The fixation was stable in 65%, relatively unstable in 25%, and unstable in 10%. Visual acuity was the only factor that determined the stability and location of fixation. The characteristics of fixation were not related to the macular thickness or volume as measured by OCT.

Conclusions

Better visual outcome ensures central and stable fixation. Quantitative measures of OCT parameters do not determine fixation. Further studies on morphological features of the macula may provide some insight into the determinants of fixation.     

新型小分子抗VEGF药物Brolucizumab治疗新生血管性ARMD研究进展

抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)药物已成为治疗眼内新生血管的首选,但频繁玻璃体内注射带来的不便和并发症不容忽视,因此寻求药效持久的新型药物以减少注射次数成为必要。Brolucizumab是一种新型的小分子抗VEGF药物,具有组织穿透性强、药物浓度高、注射量较小、药效持久和注射间隔较长等优势。注册临床研究及真实世界证据显示Brolucizumab相较于阿柏西普疗效呈非劣效性;其改善视网膜内积液/视网膜下积液能力更为显著,且可维持较长的给药间隔;另外,Brolucizumab的安全性较高,严重不良事件如视网膜血管炎已有报告,但发生率较低。Brolucizumab为临床治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(nARMD)提供了新的选择。本文就Brolucizumab在nARMD治疗中的最新进展作一综述。