Enhanced anti‐tumor effects of the PD‐1 blockade combined with a highly absorptive form of curcumin targeting STAT3

PD‐1/PD‐L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors are promising cancer immunotherapies however responses are still limited and the development of more effective combination immunotherapy is needed. We previously reported that STAT3 activation in cancer cells and immune cells was involved in immune‐resistant mechanisms. In this study, we evaluated the effect of highly absorptive forms of curcumin extracts and synthetic curcumin on anti‐tumor T cell responses. The curcumin po administration resulted in the significant augmentation of in vivo induction of tumor antigen‐specific T cells through restoration of dendritic cells (DCs) by inhibiting directly STAT3 in DCs and indirectly via reduced IL‐6 production from STAT3 activated cancer cells in 2 syngeneic MC38 and CT26 murine tumor models. Curcumin also showed direct DC enhancing activity and enhanced T cell induction for the immunized antigens in non‐tumor‐bearing mice and human hosts. Curcumin restored DC functions in xenogeneic nude mouse model implanted with high IL‐6‐producing human clear cell ovarian cancer cells. The combination of curcumin and PD‐1/PD‐L1 Abs demonstrated a synergistic anti‐tumor activity in MC38 murine tumor models. These results indicated that curcumin augments the induction of tumor antigen‐specific T cells by restoring the T cell stimulatory activity of DCs targeting activated STAT3 in both cancer cells and immune cells. Combination immunotherapy with curcumin and PD‐1/PD‐L1 Ab is an attractive strategy in the development of effective immunotherapy against various cancers.     

PD‐1‐induced T cell exhaustion is controlled by a Drp1‐dependent mechanism

Programmed cell death‐1 (PD‐1) signaling downregulates the T‐cell response, promoting an exhausted state in tumor‐infiltrating T cells, through mostly unveiled molecular mechanisms. Dynamin‐related protein‐1 (Drp1)‐dependent mitochondrial fission plays a crucial role in sustaining T‐cell motility, proliferation, survival, and glycolytic engagement. Interestingly, such processes are exactly those inhibited by PD‐1 in tumor‐infiltrating T cells. Here, we show that PD‐1^pos CD8⁺ T cells infiltrating an MC38 (murine adenocarcinoma)‐derived murine tumor mass have a downregulated Drp1 activity and more elongated mitochondria compared with PD‐1^neg counterparts. Also, PD‐1^pos lymphocytic elements infiltrating a human colon cancer rarely express active Drp1. Mechanistically, PD‐1 signaling directly prevents mitochondrial fragmentation following T‐cell stimulation by downregulating Drp1 phosphorylation on Ser616, via regulation of the ERK1/2 and mTOR pathways. In addition, downregulation of Drp1 activity in tumor‐infiltrating PD‐1^pos CD8⁺ T cells seems to be a mechanism exploited by PD‐1 signaling to reduce motility and proliferation of these cells. Overall, our data indicate that the modulation of Drp1 activity in tumor‐infiltrating T cells may become a valuable target to ameliorate the anticancer immune response in future immunotherapy approaches.     

CPI‐203 improves the efficacy of anti‐PD‐1 therapy by inhibiting the induced PD‐L1 overexpression in liver cancer

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the commonest lethal malignancies worldwide, and often diagnosed at an advanced stage, without any curative therapy. Immune checkpoint blockers targeting the programmed death receptor 1 (PD‐1) have shown impressive antitumor activity in patients with advanced‐stage HCC, while the response rate is only 30%. Inducible PD‐L1 overexpression may result in a lack of response to cancer immunotherapy, which is attributed to a mechanism of adaptive immune resistance. Our study investigated that the overexpression of PD‐L1 promoted the invasion and migration of liver cancer cells in vitro, and the induced overexpression of PD‐L1 in the tumor microenvironment could weaken the effects of anti‐PD‐1 immunotherapy in a BALB/c mouse model of liver cancer. CPI‐203, a small‐molecule bromodomain‐containing protein 4 (BRD4) inhibitor, which can potently inhibit PD‐L1 expression in vitro and in vivo, combined with PD‐1 antibody improved the response to immunotherapy in a liver cancer model. Cell transfection and chromatin immunoprecipitation assay manifested that BRD4 plays a key role in PD‐L1 expression; CPI‐203 can inhibit PD‐L1 expression by inhibiting the BRD4 occupation of the PD‐L1 promoter region. This study indicates a potential clinical immunotherapy method to reduce the incidence of clinical resistance to immunotherapy in patients with HCC.     

The miR‐19b‐3p‐MAP2K3‐STAT3 feedback loop regulates cell proliferation and invasion in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is one of the most refractory malignancies worldwide. Mitogen‐activated protein kinase 3 (MAP2K3) has a contradictory role in tumor progression, and the function and expression patterns of MAP2K3 in ESCC remain to be determined. We found that MAP2K3 expression to be downregulated in ESCC, and MAP2K3 downregulation correlated with clinically poor survival. MAP2K3 inhibited ESCC cell proliferation and invasion in vitro and in vivo. MAP2K3 suppressed STAT3 expression and activation. Mechanistically, MAPSK3 interacted with MDM2 to promote STAT3 degradation via the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway. Furthermore, exosomal miR‐19b‐3p derived from the plasma of patients with ESCC could suppress MAP2K3 expression to promote ESCC tumorigenesis. STAT3 was found to bind to the MIR19B promoter and increased the expression of miR‐19b‐3p in ESCC cells. In summary, our results demonstrated that the miR‐19b‐3p‐MAP2K3‐STAT3 feedback loop regulates ESCC tumorigenesis and elucidates the potential of therapeutically targeting this pathway in ESCC.     

Distinct roles of programmed death ligand 1 alternative splicing isoforms in colorectal cancer

Although anti–programmed death‐1 (PD‐1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) immunotherapy has achieved great success in some cancers, most colorectal cancer (CRC) patients remain unresponsive. Therefore, further clarification of the underlying mechanisms is needed to improve the therapy. In this study, we explored the distinct functions of different PD‐L1 alternative splicing isoforms in CRC. We investigated the biological functions in PD‐L1 knocked down/knockout cells, which were verified through overexpression of PD‐L1 isoforms a, b, and c. The roles of PD‐L1 isoforms in immune surveillance resistance was also analyzed. Meanwhile, we performed RNA‐seq to screen the downstream molecules regulated by PD‐L1 isoforms. Finally, we detected PD‐L1 and PD‐L1 isoforms levels in a cohort of serum samples, two cohorts of CRC tissue samples, and analyzed the correlation of PD‐L1 isoforms with PD‐1 blockade therapy response in two clinical CRC cases. The results indicated that PD‐L1 knockout inhibited proliferation, migration, and invasion, and isoform b exerted a more significant inhibitory effect on T cells than the other two isoforms. Moreover, isoform c could promote CRC progression through regulating epithelial‐mesenchymal transition. Clinical data showed that CRC patients with positive PD‐L1 expression were associated with poorer overall survival. High serum PD‐L1 level was associated with poor prognosis. The level of isoform b or c was negatively associated with prognosis, and a higher level of isoform b was associated with a good response to anti–PD‐1 therapy. In conclusion, isoform b should be considered as a biomarker for clinical responsiveness to anti–PD‐1/PD‐L1 immunotherapy; isoform c had a prometastatic role and is a new potential target for CRC therapy.     

Impacts of the STING‐IFNAR1‐STAT1‐IRF1 pathway on the cellular immune reaction induced by fractionated irradiation

Radiotherapy (RT) combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors has recently produced outstanding results and is expected to be adaptable for various cancers. However, the precise molecular mechanism by which immune reactions are induced by fractionated RT is still controversial. We aimed to investigate the mechanism of the immune response regarding multifractionated, long‐term radiation, which is most often combined with immunotherapy. Two human esophageal cancer cell lines, KYSE‐450 and OE‐21, were irradiated by fractionated irradiation (FIR) daily at a dose of 3 Gy in 5 d/wk for 2 weeks. Western blot analysis and RNA sequencing identified type I interferon (IFN) and the stimulator of IFN genes (STING) pathway as candidates that regulate immune response by FIR. We inhibited STING, IFNAR1, STAT1, and IFN regulatory factor 1 (IRF1) and investigated the effects on the immune response in cancer cells and the invasion of surrounding immune cells. We herein revealed type I IFN‐dependent immune reactions and the positive feedback of STING, IRF1, and phosphorylated STAT1 induced by FIR. Knocking out STING, IFNAR1, STAT1, and IRF1 resulted in a poorer immunological response than that in WT cells. The STING‐KO KYSE‐450 cell line showed significantly less invasion of PBMCs than the WT cell line under FIR. In the analysis of STING‐KO cells and migrated PBMCs, we confirmed the occurrence of STING‐dependent immune activation under FIR. In conclusion, we identified that the STING‐IFNAR1‐STAT1‐IRF1 axis regulates immune reactions in cancer cells triggered by FIR and that the STING pathway also contributes to immune cell invasion of cancer cells.     

A small molecule targeting CHI3L1 inhibits lung metastasis by blocking IL‐13Rα2‐mediated JNK‐AP‐1 signals

Our previous big data analyses showed a high level of association between chitinase 3 like1 (CHI3L1) expression and lung tumor development. In the present study, we investigated whether a CHI3L1‐inhibiting chemical, 2‐({3‐[2‐(1‐cyclohexen‐1‐yl)ethyl]‐6,7‐dimethoxy‐4‐oxo‐3,4‐dihydro‐2‐quinazolinyl}sulfanyl)‐N‐(4‐ethylphenyl)butanamide (K284), could inhibit lung metastasis and studied its mechanism of action. We investigated the antitumor effect of K284 both in vitro and in vivo. K284 (0.5 mg·kg⁻¹ body weight) significantly inhibited lung metastasis in in vivo models after injection of murine melanoma cells (B16F10) or adenocarcinomic human alveolar basal epithelial cells (A549). K284 significantly and concentration‐dependently also inhibited cancer cell proliferation and migration in the A549 and H460 lung cancer cell lines. We found that the binding of K284 to the chitin‐binding domain (CBD) of CHI3L1 prevented the binding of CHI3L1 to its receptor, interleukin‐13 receptor subunit alpha‐2 (IL‐13Rα2), thereby suppressing the CHI3L1 signal. This blocking of the CHI3L1‐IL‐13Rα2 signal caused the inhibition of c‐Jun N‐terminal kinase (JNK)‐activator protein 1 (AP‐1) signals, resulting in the prevention of lung metastasis and cancer cell growth. Our data demonstrate that K284 may serve as a potential candidate anticancer compound targeting CHI3L1.     

Adjuvant atezolizumab in Japanese patients with resected stage IB‐IIIA non‐small cell lung cancer (IMpower010)

The global phase 3 IMpower010 study evaluated adjuvant atezolizumab versus best supportive care (BSC) following platinum‐based chemotherapy in patients with resected stage IB–IIIA non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report a subgroup analysis in patients enrolled in Japan. Eligible patients had complete resection of histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IB (tumors ≥4 cm)–IIIA NSCLC. Upon completing 1–4 cycles of adjuvant cisplatin‐based chemotherapy, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive atezolizumab (fixed dose of 1200 mg every 21 days; 16 cycles or 1 year) or BSC. The primary endpoint of the global IMpower010 study was investigator‐assessed disease‐free survival, tested hierarchically first in patients with stage II–IIIA NSCLC whose tumors expressed programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) on ≥1% of tumor cells, then in all randomized patients with stage II–IIIA NSCLC, and finally in the intention‐to‐treat (ITT) population (stage IB–IIIA NSCLC). Safety was evaluated in all patients who received atezolizumab or BSC. The study comprised 149 enrolled patients in three populations: ITT (n = 117; atezolizumab, n = 59; BSC, n = 58), all‐randomized stage II–IIIA (n = 113; atezolizumab, n = 56; BSC, n = 57), and PD‐L1 tumor cells ≥1% stage II–IIIA (n = 74; atezolizumab, n = 41; BSC, n = 33). At the data cutoff date (January 21, 2021), a trend toward disease‐free survival improvement with atezolizumab vs BSC was observed in the PD‐L1 tumor cells ≥1% stage II–IIIA (unstratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25–1.08), all‐randomized stage II–IIIA (unstratified HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.35–1.11), and ITT (unstratified HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.34–1.10) populations. Atezolizumab‐related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 16% of patients; no treatment‐related grade 5 events occurred. Adjuvant atezolizumab showed disease‐free survival improvement and a tolerable toxicity profile in Japanese patients in IMpower010, consistent with the global study results.     

DDR1 functions as an immune negative factor in colorectal cancer by regulating tumor‐infiltrating T cells through IL‐18

Immunotherapies represented by programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD‐1/PD‐L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors have made great progress in the field of anticancer treatment, but most colorectal cancer patients do not benefit from immunotherapy. Discoidin domain receptor 1 (DDR1), a tyrosine kinase receptor, is activated by collagen binding and overexpressed in various malignancies. However, the role of DDR1 in colorectal cancer and immunoregulation remains unclear. In this study, we found DDR1 is highly expressed in colorectal cancer tissues and negatively associated with patient survival. We demonstrated that DDR1 promotes colorectal tumor growth only in vivo. Mechanistically, DDR1 is a negative immunomodulator in colorectal cancer and is involved in low infiltration of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells by inhibiting IL‐18 synthesis. We also reported that DDR1 enhances the expression of PD‐L1 through activating the c‐Jun amino terminal kinase (JNK) signaling pathway. In conclusion, our findings elucidate the immunosuppressive role of DDR1 in colorectal cancer, which may represent a novel target to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy in colorectal cancer.     

CD24, not CD47, negatively impacts upon response to PD‐1/L1 inhibitors in non–small‐cell lung cancer with PD‐L1 tumor proportion score < 50

CD24, a heavily glycosylated glycosylphosphatidylinositol–anchored surface protein, inhibits phagocytosis as potently as CD47. The relationship between such anti‐phagocytic factors and the immune response with immune–checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) remains unexplored. We evaluated CD24 and CD47 tumor proportion scores (TPS) in 68 of the 106 patients with advanced non–small‐cell lung cancer who participated in a prospective observational study of ICI treatment. We also explored the impact of CD24 TPS and CD47 TPS on ICI efficacy and serum cytokine changes. CD24 positivity (TPS ≥ 1) was negatively associated with progression–free survival (PFS) of ICI when PD‐L1 TPS was < 50 (median PFS; 37 vs 127 d, P = .033), but there was no association when PD‐L1 TPS was ≥ 50 (median PFS; 494 vs 144 d, P = .168). CD24 positivity was also related to significantly higher increase of CCL2 from baseline to 4‐6 wk later, and such increase was notably observed only when PD‐L1 TPS < 50 (P = .0004). CCL2 increase after ICI initiation was negatively predictive for survival after initiation of ICI (median survival time; not reached vs 233 d; P = .028). CD47 TPS high (≥60) significantly suppressed the increase in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)‐A, D and PDGF‐AB/BB after ICI initiation. There was no association, however, between CD47 tumor expression and the efficacy of ICI. In conclusion, CD24, not CD47, is a candidate negative predictive marker of ICI in advanced, non–small‐cell lung cancer with PD‐L1 TPS < 50. Tumor expression of both CD24 and CD47 was associated with changes in factors related to monocytes and angiogenesis after ICI initiation (UMIN000024414).     

Real‐world outcomes of pembrolizumab monotherapy in non‐small cell lung cancer in Japan: A post‐marketing surveillance

This post‐marketing surveillance (PMS) was initiated in Japan to identify factors affecting the safety and effectiveness of pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed cell death ligand‐1 (PD‐L1) expression. This PMS was conducted from December 2016 to June 2019 at 717 centers across Japan. Patients with unresectable advanced/recurrent NSCLC who received pembrolizumab monotherapy as first‐line (1L) treatment for PD‐L1‐expressing tumors (Tumor Proportion Score [TPS] ≥ 50%) or second‐line or later (2L+) treatment for tumors with PD‐L1 TPS ≥ 1% were enrolled and followed up for 1 year. Of 2805 registered patients, 2740 and 2400 comprised the safety and effectiveness analysis sets, respectively. The median age (range) was 69 (27–92) years; 55.7% and 29.2% of patients experienced treatment‐related adverse events and adverse events of special interest (AEOSIs), respectively. More common AEOSIs included interstitial lung disease, endocrine disorders, liver dysfunction, colitis/severe diarrhea, infusion reactions, and severe skin disorders. The frequency of experiencing ≥2 AEOSIs was low (1L, 6.5%; 2L+, 2.8%). Most AEOSIs occurred within 150 days after initiation of pembrolizumab monotherapy. At 1‐year follow‐up, the objective response rate was 39.2% (1L, 51.5%; 2L+, 30.0%). In conclusion, the 1‐year safety and effectiveness of pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with unresectable advanced/recurrent NSCLC as 1L treatment for tumors with PD‐L1 TPS ≥ 50% and 2L+ treatment for tumors with PD‐L1 TPS ≥ 1% were similar to those reported in phase 2/3 trials.     

Dual inhibition of TGF‐β and PD‐L1: a novel approach to cancer treatment

Transforming growth factor‐β (TGF‐β) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) initiate signaling pathways with complementary, nonredundant immunosuppressive functions in the tumor microenvironment (TME). In the TME, dysregulated TGF‐β signaling suppresses antitumor immunity and promotes cancer fibrosis, epithelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition, and angiogenesis. Meanwhile, PD‐L1 expression inactivates cytotoxic T cells and restricts immunosurveillance in the TME. Anti‐PD‐L1 therapies have been approved for the treatment of various cancers, but TGF‐β signaling in the TME is associated with resistance to these therapies. In this review, we discuss the importance of the TGF‐β and PD‐L1 pathways in cancer, as well as clinical strategies using combination therapies that block these pathways separately or approaches with dual‐targeting agents (bispecific and bifunctional immunotherapies) that may block them simultaneously. Currently, the furthest developed dual‐targeting agent is bintrafusp alfa. This drug is a first‐in‐class bifunctional fusion protein that consists of the extracellular domain of the TGF‐βRII receptor (a TGF‐β ‘trap’) fused to a human immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody blocking PD‐L1. Given the immunosuppressive effects of the TGF‐β and PD‐L1 pathways within the TME, colocalized and simultaneous inhibition of these pathways may potentially improve clinical activity and reduce toxicity.     

Melatonin inhibits EMT and PD‐L1 expression through the ERK1/2/FOSL1 pathway and regulates anti‐tumor immunity in HNSCC

Melatonin is an endogenous hormone with various biological functions and possesses anti‐tumor properties in multiple malignancies. Immune evasion is one of the most important hallmarks of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and is closely related to tumor progression. However, as an immune modulator under physiological conditions, the roles of melatonin in tumor immunity in HNSCC remains unclear. In this study, we found that the endogenous melatonin levels in patients with HNSCC were lower than those in patients with benign tumors in head and neck. Importantly, lower melatonin levels were related to lymph node metastasis among patients with HNSCC. Moreover, melatonin significantly suppressed programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) expression and inhibited epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) of HNSCC through the ERK1/2/FOSL1 pathway in vitro and in vivo. In SCC7/C3H syngeneic mouse models, anti‐programmed death‐1 (PD‐1) antibody combined with melatonin significantly inhibited tumor growth and modulated anti‐tumor immunity by increasing CD8⁺ T cell infiltration and decreasing the regulatory T cell (Treg) proportion in the tumor microenvironment. Taken together, melatonin inhibited EMT and downregulated PD‐L1 expression in HNSCC through the ERK1/2/FOSL1 pathway and exerted synergistic effects with anti‐PD‐1 antibody in vivo, which could provide promising strategies for HNSCC treatment.     

α1,4‐Linked N‐acetylglucosamine suppresses gastric cancer development by inhibiting Mucin‐1‐mediated signaling

Gastric cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, and more understanding of its molecular basis is urgently needed. Gastric gland mucin secreted from pyloric gland cells, mucous neck cells, and cardiac gland cells of the gastric mucosa harbors unique O‐glycans carrying terminal α1,4‐linked N‐acetylglucosamine (αGlcNAc) residues. We previously reported that αGlcNAc loss correlated positively with poor outcomes for patients with differentiated‐type gastric cancer. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying these outcomes remained poorly understood. Here, we examined the effects of upregulated αGlcNAc expression on malignant phenotypes of the differentiated‐type gastric cancer cell lines, AGS and MKN7. Upregulation of αGlcNAc following ectopic expression of its biosynthetic enzyme attenuated cell proliferation, motility, and invasiveness of AGS and MKN7 cells in vitro. Moreover, AGS cell tumorigenicity was significantly suppressed by αGlcNAc overexpression in a xenograft model. To define the molecular mechanisms underlying these phenotypes, we investigated αGlcNAc binding proteins in AGS cells and identified Mucin‐1 (MUC1) and podocalyxin. Both proteins were colocalized with αGlcNAc on human gastric cancer cells. We also found that αGlcNAc was bound to MUC1 in murine normal gastric mucosa. When we assessed the effects of αGlcNAc binding to MUC1, we found that αGlcNAc blocked galectin‐3 binding to MUC1, phosphorylation of the MUC1 C‐terminus, and recruitment of Src and β‐catenin to that C‐terminus. These results suggest that αGlcNAc regulates cancer cell phenotypes by dampening MUC1 signal transduction.     

First‐line pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy in metastatic non‐small‐cell lung cancer: KEYNOTE‐024 Japan subset

This prespecified subanalysis of the global, randomized controlled phase III KEYNOTE‐024 study of pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy in previously untreated metastatic non‐small‐cell lung cancer without EGFR/ALK alterations and a programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) tumor proportion score of 50% or higher evaluated clinical outcomes among patients enrolled in Japan. Treatment consisted of pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks (35 cycles) or platinum‐based chemotherapy (four to six cycles). The primary end‐point was progression‐free survival; secondary end‐points included overall survival and safety. Of 305 patients randomized in KEYNOTE‐024 overall, 40 patients were enrolled in Japan (all received treatment: pembrolizumab, n = 21; chemotherapy, n = 19). Median progression‐free survival was 41.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2‐42.5) months with pembrolizumab and 4.1 (95% CI, 2.8‐8.3) months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.27 [95% CI, 0.11‐0.65]; one‐sided, nominal P = .001). Median overall survival was not reached (NR) (95% CI, 22.9‒NR) and 21.5 (95% CI, 5.2‐35.0) months, respectively (HR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.17‐0.91]; one‐sided, nominal P = .012). Treatment‐related adverse events occurred in 21/21 (100%) pembrolizumab‐treated and 18/19 (95%) chemotherapy‐treated patients; eight patients (38%) and nine patients (47%), respectively, had grade 3‐5 events. Immune‐mediated adverse events and infusion reactions occurred in 11 pembrolizumab‐treated patients (52%) and four chemotherapy‐treated patients (21%), respectively; four patients (19%) and one patient (5%), respectively, had grade 3‐5 events. Consistent with results from KEYNOTE‐024 overall, first‐line pembrolizumab improved progression‐free survival and overall survival vs chemotherapy with manageable safety among Japanese patients with metastatic non‐small‐cell lung cancer without EGFR/ALK alterations and a PD‐L1 tumor proportion score of 50% or higher. The trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov: {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT02142738","term_id":"NCT02142738"}}NCT02142738.     

Long noncoding RNA DANCR confers cytarabine resistance in acute myeloid leukemia by activating autophagy via the miR‐874‐3P/ATG16L1 axis

Autophagy is an important mechanism involved in the regulation of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) chemoresistance. The long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) differentiation antagonizing non‐protein coding RNA (DANCR) exhibits oncogenic activity in several types of human cancers, including AML, but it remains unclear whether it regulates autophagy and chemoresistance in AML. We report here that cytarabine (Ara‐C) treatment elevates DANCR expression in human AML cells. In addition, DANCR overexpression confers and its knockdown diminishes Ara‐C resistance in human AML cells, suggesting that DANCR positively regulates AML chemoresistance to Ara‐C. Moreover, DANCR promotes autophagy in Ara‐C‐treated human AML cells and acts as a sponge to decrease miR‐20a‐5p expression, thereby upregulating the expression of ATG16L1, a critical component of the autophagy machinery. Importantly, ATG16L1 silencing abrogates DANCR‐promoted autophagy and markedly restores DANCR‐conferred Ara‐C resistance, suggesting that DANCR promotes MIR‐874‐3P/ATG16L1 axis‐regulated autophagy to confer Ara‐C resistance in human AML cells. Together, this study identifies DANCR as a positive regulator of Ara‐C resistance in human AML cells, suggesting this lncRNA as a potential target for overcoming Ara‐C resistance in AML chemotherapy.