A comparison of imipenem to ceftazidime with or without amikacin as empiric therapy in febrile neutropenic patients.

BACKGROUND--Neutropenic patients with cancer are traditionally treated with empiric antibiotic combinations when they become febrile. The availability of broad-spectrum antibiotics such as ceftazidime and imipenem has made it possible to initiate therapy with a single agent (monotherapy). The objectives of this trial were to compare ceftazidime and imipenem as single agents for the therapy of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients and to ascertain whether the addition of an aminoglycoside (amikacin) to either of these agents would provide an advantage. METHODS--A prospective clinical trial was conducted in which eligible neutropenic patients with cancer were randomized to one of four treatment arms: ceftazidime alone; imipenem alone; ceftazidime plus amikacin; and imipenem plus amikacin. Efficacy analysis was done for 750 assessable episodes. A multivariate logistic-regression analysis was also performed to examine the unique contribution of various prognostic factors. RESULTS--The overall response rates were 76% with imipenem plus amikacin, 72% with imipenem, 71% with ceftazidime plus amikacin, and 59% with ceftazidime alone. Single-organism gram-positive infections occurred in 101 of 750 episodes. Without a change in antibiotics, the response rates were 50% with imipenem, 40% with imipenem plus amikacin, 39% with ceftazidime plus amikacin, and 38% with ceftazidime. Most responded to vancomycin or other antibiotics, and the mortality associated with gram-positive infections was only 5%. Regardless of the antibiotic regimen, the majority of uncomplicated gram-negative infections responded to therapy and the majority of complicated gram-negative infections failed to respond. Multivariate logistic-regression analysis showed that recovery of the neutrophil count was the most favorable prognostic factor in a patient's response to infection, whereas the presence of gram-positive infection, acute leukemia, pulmonary or enteric infection, and therapy with ceftazidime were unfavorable factors. CONCLUSIONS--Single-agent therapy with imipenem is as effective as more conventional combination antibiotic therapy for the empirical treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients with cancer.     

A multicenter comparative trial of tobramycin and ticarcillin vs moxalactam and ticarcillin in febrile neutropenic patients

During a multicenter prospective randomized trial in febrile neutropenic patients (neutrophil count, less than 1,000/cu mm), 103 episodes were treated with tobramycin sulfate plus ticarcillin disodium (TT) while 117 were treated with moxalactam plus ticarcillin disodium (MT). The majority of patients had an underlying diagnosis of leukemia (60%) and most (62.8%) had granulocyte counts of less than 100/cu mm at the start of therapy. The response rates for clinically or microbiologically documented episodes were 38 of 60 (55.1%) for TT and 38 of 64 (59.4%) for MT. The MT regimen appeared to be more effective for gram-positive infections (56% vs 33%) while TT appeared more effective for gram-negative infections (64% vs 40%). Nephrotoxicity attributable to study drugs occurred in only 2.3% of cases (one on each treatment arm). Prolongation of the prothrombin time was observed in only six of 78 (7.7%) in the TT arm as compared with 39 of 103 (38%) in the MT arm. Neither regimen was adequate for the unusually high frequency of gram-positive pathogens seen during this study.     

Ceftriaxone and amikacin as single daily dose in the empiric therapy for febrile episodes in neutropenic patients

One hundred thirty-three febrile episodes in 115 neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies were empirically treated with ceftriaxone and amikacin in a single daily dose. An indwelling central venous catheter (CVC) was present in 44 cases. Septicemia was documented in 18 (41%) patients with CVC (13 gram-positive, 5 gram-negative and 1 fungus) and in 30 (34%) patients without CVC (19 gram-positive, 10 gram-negative and 2 fungi). Coagulase-negative staphylococcus was observed in 10 out of 19 blood isolates in the presence of a CVC and in 6 out of 31 blood isolates in patients without CVC. Empiric therapy was successful in 56.4% of cases. Improvement after the addition of vancomycin or teicoplanin was observed in 38.6% of cases with a CVC and in 13.5% of those without (p less than 0.02). Only two patients died from gram negative septicemia, and the substitution of ceftriaxone with another beta-lactam was necessary in only 6% of the cases. Empiric therapy with single daily-dose ceftriaxone and amikacin appears to be effective in febrile neutropenic patients; our data, however, show the high incidence of Staphylococcus epidermidis septicemia and the frequent need to add an anti-gram-positive drug in patients with an indwelling CVC.     

Vancomycin as part of initial empirical antibiotic therapy for febrile neutropenia in patients with cancer: pros and cons.

Gram-positive organisms predominate as the bacterial pathogens identified in episodes of febrile neutropenia. This has led to increased use of antibiotics with efficacy against gram-positive organisms (often vancomycin) as part of empirical antibiotic regimens for treating febrile neutropenia. Among 101 children randomized to receive amikacin, ticarcillin, and vancomycin or ticarcillin/clavulanate and amikacin along with vancomycin placebo, treatment success in those treated with vancomycin was higher (85% vs. 62%). In 1990, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group compared amikacin and ceftazidime with and without vancomycin and concluded that there was no need to include vancomycin in initial empirical antibiotic therapy. Results from another study and a retrospective review of a large clinical trial also support the previous conclusion. In 1999, most experts in the field recommend vancomycin not be part of the initial empirical therapy regimen for treating febrile neutropenia in patients with cancer.     

Piperacillin plus amikacin vs. piperacillin plus amikacin plus teicoplanin for empirical treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients receiving quinolone prophylaxis.

A prospective, randomized trial was initiated to evaluate the efficacy of two antibiotic regimens, differing in the agent included with activity against gram-positive bacteria, for the empirical treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies (group 1, piperacillin plus amikacin; group 2, piperacillin plus amikacin plus teicoplanin). After 72 hours of therapy, patients in group 1 who were still febrile were administered teicoplanin and those in group 2 were administered amphotericin B. A total of 158 evaluable episodes were observed within 8 months. The success rate was 50.6% in group 1 and 60% in group 2. The response rate among patients who did not respond to the original regimen increased to 86.7% with the addition of teicoplanin (group 1) and to 90% with the addition of amphotericin B (group 2). There were 86 unexplained febrile episodes and 56 documented episodes of bacteremia (34 caused by gram-positive organisms). Our results indicate that teicoplanin is safe, well tolerated, and effective for the treatment of documented episodes of gram-positive bacteremia and as an empirical agent. The inclusion of teicoplanin in the initial empirical regimen appears unnecessary if a combination of antibiotics active against gram-positive organisms is used, unless infections are due to oxacillin-resistant staphylococci.     

Moxalactam plus ticarcillin or tobramycin for treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic cancer patients

Moxalactam disodium in combination with ticarcillin disodium or tobramycin sulfate was used to treat 445 episodes of suspected or confirmed infection in patients with cancer. The majority had leukemia and neutropenia. The rate of cures during the 231 confirmed infections was 65% for moxalactam and ticarcillin and 64% for moxalactam and tobramycin. Both regimens were comparable against aerobic gram-negative and polymicrobial infections. In gram-positive infections, the response rate for moxalactam and ticarcillin was 73% and for moxalactam and tobramycin, 53%. Only three of nine enterococcal infections responded to treatment. Thirteen percent of all organisms recovered were resistant to moxalactam. Side effects occurred infrequently; the most important was coagulopathy due to moxalactam. Nephrotoxic effects occurred in six patients receiving moxalactam and tobramycin and in none of those receiving moxalactam and ticarcillin. In 39 patients, a superinfection was confirmed. Fourteen were fungal, three were due to enterococcus, and one due to Klebsiella species. Eleven of the 14 fungal episodes occurred in the moxalactam-ticarcillin group. Moxalactam with ticarcillin and moxalactam with tobramycin are equally active for the initial treatment of presumed infection in patients with neutropenia.     

Empiric therapy with aztreonam for febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies

Combination of aztreonam/amikacin/ticarcillin (AAT) and latamoxef/amikacin/ticarcillin (LAT) were compared in a prospective randomized trial of empiric therapy for febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies. Low dose amphotericin B was also added to each regimen from the beginning. Of 45 evaluable episodes, 23 were treated with AAT and 22 with LAT. The response rates were 61 percent for AAT and 50 percent for LAT, statistically not significant. There was one infection-related death among patients assigned to AAT therapy and also one among those assigned to LAT therapy. Dose escalation of amphotericin B seemed to be effective for those patients who did not improve with initial therapy.     

Combination of Amikacin and either Ampicillin or Cephalotin as Initial Treatment of Febrile Neutropenic Patients

ABSTRACT. A prospective, randomized trial of two antibiotic combinations (amikacin plus either ampicillin or cephalotin) was performed on 39 consecutive episodes of fever in 30 patients with neutropenia and hematological malignancy. Infections were documented as the cause of fever in 37 episodes (95%): in 21 episodes (54%) bacteria or a virus (n=1) were isolated, and in 16 (41% of all episodes) the infection was documented clinically but no pathogen was isolated. The most frequently isolated bacteria were Staph, aureus (38% of all strains), E. coli (13%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (13%). Bacteremia occurred in 18% of the febrile episodes. Improvement followed treatment with the combination amikacin plus ampicllin in 73% of 19 cases, and with amikacin plus cephalotin in 55% of 20 cases (p>0.05), giving a total Improvement rate of 64%. Failure of therapy was seen in episodes caused by multiple bacteria or Pseudomonas infections. Mild signs of nephrotoxicity were noted in 13% during both regimens. Audiograms were normal in all but two patients who showed slight high-frequency hearing loss. A second infection occurred in 7 episodes (18%). Thus, the combination of amikacin plus ampidllin was as efficient (but less expensive) as amikacin plus cephalotin in the initial treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies.     

Empiric antibiotic therapy for suspected infection in granulocytopenic cancer patients: a comparison between the combination of moxalactam plus amikacin and ticarcillin plus amikacin

Moxalactam is a new cephalosporin with a broad spectrum of activity which includes Pseudomonas aeruginosa in addition to Klebsiella species Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus. Moxalactam was combined with amikacin (M + A) compared to ticarcillin plus amikacin (T + A) in a prospective, randomized double-blind trial of empiric therapy for febrile episodes among granulocytopenic cancer patients. One hundred and ninety-one epidoses were evaluated; T + A, 93 episodes and M + A, 98 episodes. Median granulocyte count of initiation of therapy was less than 100/microliters. Overall response rates were good. In the T + A group, 21 of 29 (72 percent) microbiologically documented infections, including seven of 14 (50 percent) bacteremias, and 24 of 27 (89 percent) clinically documented infections improved. In the M + A group, 20 of 28 (71 percent) microbiologically documented infections, including 11 of 18 (61 percent) bacteremias, and 25 of 25 (96 percent) clinically documented infections resolved. Adverse effects were minimal and equivalent in both groups. Hypokalemia (decrease in serum potassium of greater than 11 mEq/liter from baseline) occurred in 14 of the 93 episodes in the T + A group and in 10 of the 98 episodes in the M + A group with decline in mean serum potassium level of 0.5 and 0.4 mEq/liter respectively. Nephrotoxicity (increase in serum creatinine greater than 0.04 mg/dl) occurred in only one patient in the T + A group and in two patients in the M + A group. Moxalactam plus amikacin has a broader in vitro spectrum, is as effective, and is no more toxic than ticarcillin plus amikacin as empiric therapy for febrile granulocytopenic cancer patients.     

Aztreonam or gentamicin combined with piperacillin as empiric antibiotic therapy during neutropenia of patients with hematologic diseases]

Fourty-two febrile episodes of 32 patients with hematologic disease during neutropenia were treated with two randomly assigned antibiotic combinations of either piperacillin plus gentamicin or piperacillin plus aztreonam. Eleven of the 22 febrile episodes treated with piperacillin plus gentamicin and 12 of the 20 febrile episodes treated with piperacillin plus aztreonam responded. Addition of cefamandole to non-responders improved the outcome in 2 of the 16 febrile episodes. Mean nadir leucocyte count, age, sex, and underlying disease were not significantly different in both groups. Side effects were tolerable in both groups, although 1 patient treated with piperacillin plus gentamicin showed severe renal impairment. Piperacillin plus aztreonam is as effective as piperacillin plus gentamicin as an empiric antibiotic combination in the treatment of febrile episodes with hematologic disease during neutropenia.     

Using teicoplanin for empiric therapy of febrile neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies

S ummary The cumulative experience with teicoplanin in treating febrile neutropenic patients included in three different comparative clinical trials conducted at a single institution during a 3-year period, is presented. 1 52 febrile episodes in 129 neutropenic patients were treated with iv. teicoplanin (6 mg/kg/d) combined with amikacin (15 mg/kg/d) plus ceftazidime (90 mg/kg/d). The study population comprised 75 patients with acute leukaemia and 77 marrow recipients: 53(% (81/152) had a central venous catheter in place and 68%) (103/152) had severe neutropenia (< 100/mm³) at the beginning of the febrile episode.
The overall response rate of the evaluiable febrile episodes was excellent: 88% (107/122) improved. Bacteraemias due to Gram-positive cocci accounted for 75% of the total (42/56) and pathogens in the blood isolates were mostly staphylo-cocci (coagulase-negative 14, coagulase-positive 13) and streptococci (131. The response rate of Gram-positive bacteraemias was good: 88% (37/42) improved and 75% (9/12) of Gram-positive bacteraemias having teicoplanin as the only antibiotic with in vitro activity against the infective strains were cured. Death due to infection accounted for 7% of total febrile episodes (11/152). Side effects were documented in 14(%, of the episodes. In a setting of high prevalence of Grampositive infections caused by strains with a high rate of resistance to aminoglycoside and betalactam antibiotics, there may be an advantage in including teicoplanin in the initial empiric antibiotic regimen for febrile neutropenic cancer patients.     

A randomized comparative trial of three aminoglycosides--comparison of continuous infusions of gentamicin, amikacin and sisomicin combined with carbenicillin in the treatment of infections in neutropenic patients with malignancies.

Continuous infusions of gentamicin, amikacin or sisomicin combined with carbenicillin were compared in a randomized study in the treatment of 572 febrile episodes in 281 patients with cancer. The three treatments (C+A, C+A and C+S) were equally effective with no significant differences in response rate overall (67%, 68%, 67%) or in any infection, except septicemia where C+G had a significantly lower response rate than the other two groups. Pneumonia, the most common infection, had the lowest response rate for all three groups (45-50%). Klebsiella spp. were the most common pathogens and showed a lower response rate than other gram-negative bacilli (P = 0.003). Patients with persistent severe neutropenia had a response rate of 56%. Azotemia was significantly less common in patients with documented infection treated with C+A than in the C+S group. Combinations of carbenicillin plus an aminoglycoside antibiotic are effective for the treatment of infections in neutropenic patients.     

Piperacillin or ticarcillin plus amikacin: A double-blind prospective comparison of empiric antibiotic therapy for febrile granulocytopenic cancer patients

Piperacillin plus amikacin was compared in a prospective randomized double-blind trial with our standard regimen of ticarcillin plus amikacin as empiric therapy of fever in patients with granulocytopenia. Profound persistent granulocytopenia (fewer than 100/μl polymorphonuclear leukocytes without a rise during therapy) was present in 60 percent of the patient trials in both treatment groups. Of 38 microbiologically and clinically documented infections treated with piperacillin plus amikacin, 22 (58 percent) showed improvement. Of 34 microbiologically and clinically documented infections treated with ticarcillin plus amikacin, 19 (56 percent) showed improvement. There was no difference in response between groups according to the site of infection or infecting pathogen. Toxicity was minimal, with an equivalent incidence of immediate reactions, nephrotoxicity and superinfection. Patients receiving ticarcillin plus amikacin became colonized with more resistant gram-negative bacilli (17) than did those receiving piperacillin plus amikacin (3). Despite the monosodium structure of piperacillin, hypokalemia was not reduced for patients who received piperacillin plus amikacin. Although piperacillin has a wider in vitro antibacterial spectrum than ticarcillin, the clinical efficacy and toxicity of the combination of piperacillin plus amikacin were similar to those of ticarcillin plus amikacin as empiric therapy.     

Ceftazidime plus amikacin versus ceftazidime plus vancomycin as empiric therapy in febrile neutropenic children with cancer

Two antibiotic regimens, ceftazidime plus amikacin and ceftazidime plus vancomycin, were compared in a prospective, randomized clinical trial as empiric therapy in febrile granulocytopenic children with cancer. The rate of response was similar in the two groups (66% vs. 77%). The prevalence of secondary gram-negative bacteremia was higher--but not significantly higher--in the group receiving vancomycin. Adverse reactions also occurred more often in the latter group (35% vs. 4%). Mortality did not differ significantly in the two groups. Adjustment for independent predictors of response to treatment by means of multivariate analysis confirmed the lack of any remarkable difference between the responses to the two regimens. We conclude that the use of vancomycin instead of amikacin in combination with ceftazidime does not significantly improve the outcome of treatment of fever and infection in granulocytopenic children with cancer and that the use of vancomycin is associated with an increased frequency of both secondary infections due to gram-negative bacteria and adverse reactions.     

Gram-positive infections and the use of vancomycin in 550 episodes of fever and neutropenia

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the appropriate role for vancomycin in neutropenic patients with cancer. To review the incidence, types, and outcome of gram-positive infections in a series of neutropenic patients with cancer. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Inpatient units of the Medical and Pediatric Oncology Branches of the National Cancer Institute. PATIENTS: Five hundred and fifty consecutive episodes of fever and neutropenia in patients with cancer randomized prospectively on another study to receive either ceftazidime alone or combination antibiotics for initial empirical therapy. INTERVENTION: Intravenous vancomycin (dosage adjusted by serum levels). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Gram-positive organisms were the commonest of the bacterial pathogens isolated (63%). Of the 53 gram-positive organisms accounting for primary infections (isolated at initial presentation), there were 36 staphylococcal isolates (19 coagulase-negative and 17 coagulase-positive), 13 streptococcal isolates (8 non-group D and 5 group D), and 4 polymicrobial isolates. Of the 22 secondary gram-positive infections (occurring after institution of initial antibiotics), there were 10 streptococcal isolates (9 group D and 1 non-group D), 7 staphylococcal isolates (6 coagulase-negative and 1 coagulase-positive), and 5 polymicrobial isolates. Vancomycin was used to treat 26 of the 53 primary infections, but was begun only after knowledge of the isolate in 25. Vancomycin was used to treat 17 of the 22 secondary infections, and begun only after knowledge of the isolate in 14. This approach resulted in no treatment failures for the primary infections, and a single microbiological failure for the secondary infections. There was a tendency towards a greater proportion of secondary gram-positive infections in the monotherapy group compared to the combination therapy group (16 of 282 compared with 6 of 268 respectively, P2 = 0.04 by the chi-squared test); but all were treated successfully. CONCLUSION: Vancomycin need not be included in routine empirical therapy for febrile neutropenic patients, but should be added when clinical or microbiological data suggest the need.     

Predictive factors of septic shock and mortality in neutropenic patients

Neutropenia is a major risk factor for developing a serious infection. Bacteremia still causes significant mortality among neutropenic patients with cancer. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for septic shock and for mortality in neutropenic patients with leukemia and bacteremia. Consecutive samples from 20 patients with acute myeloid leukemia and bacteremia were studied during a 1 year period (January-December 2003). All patients received empirical antibiotic therapies for febrile episodes using ceftazidime plus amikacin. About 110 neutropenic febrile episodes were noted: clinically documented 14.54%, microbiologically documented 16.36% and fever of unknown origin 69.09%. Gram-negative organism caused eight febrile episodes: Pseudomonas (5), Klebsiella (3). Gram-positive organism caused 10 episodes: Staphylococcus (6), Streptococci (2), Enterococci (2). Pulmonary infection accounted for 25% of clinically documented infections. About 14 of the 110 febrile episodes were associated with septic shock causing mortality in 7 patients. In a univariate analysis variables associated with septic shock were: pulmonary infection (OR = 17, p = 0.001), serum bicarbonate < 17 mmol/l (OR = 68, p < 0.001) and serum lactate >3 mmol/l (OR = 62, p < 0.001). Variables associated with mortality were: pulmonary infection (OR = 83, p < 0.001) and serum bicarbonate < 17 mmol/l (OR = 61, p < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis two variables were associated with septic shock: pulmonary infection (OR = 5, p = 0.043) and serum lactate >3 mmol/l (OR = 10, p = 0.003). An elevated serum lactate (>3 mmol/l) and low serum bicarbonate ( < 17 mmol/l) at the onset of bacteremia are useful biomarkers in predicting septic shock and mortality in neutropenic patients.     

Assessment of measuring circulating levels of interleukin-6, interleukin-8, C-reactive protein, soluble Fc gamma receptor type III, and mannose-binding protein in febrile children with cancer and neutropenia.

Circulating levels of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, soluble Fc gamma receptor type III (sFc gammaRIII), mannose-binding protein (MBP), and C-reactive protein (CrP) were assessed among febrile children with cancer and neutropenia. Levels of IL-6, IL-8, sFc gammaRIII, MBP, and CrP were measured in serum from 56 pediatric cancer patients at the time of admission for 121 episodes of febrile neutropenia (88 febrile episodes without identifiable source, 5 clinically documented infections, 20 episodes of bacteremia due to gram-positive and 5 due to gram-negative organisms, and 3 fungal infections). IL-6 and IL-8 levels were higher in patients with either bacteremia due to gram-negative organisms or fungal infections than in patients with febrile episodes without an identifiable source (P < .00001 for each). IL-6 and IL-8 levels were higher in children with bacteremia due to gram-negative organisms than in those with bacteremia due to gram-positive organisms (P = .0011 and P = .0003, respectively). The measured levels of CrP, MBP, and sFc gammaRIII were not useful for identifying the type of infection. These preliminary results show the potential usefulness of IL-6 and IL-8 as early indicators for life-threatening infections in febrile cancer patients with neutropenia.     

Prospective evaluation of procalcitonin in adults with febrile neutropenia after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Serum procalcitonin (PCT) levels have been proposed as a new discriminative marker for bacterial and fungal infections. We analysed the diagnostic relevance of PCT in febrile episodes of neutropenic adult patients after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). PCT was determined prospectively in 92 febrile episodes, classified according to the final diagnosis as: neutropenic fever of unknown origin (n = 51), microbiological (n = 26) or clinical (n = 5) documented infection and non-infectious febrile episodes (n = 10). On first day of fever, mean (+/- SD) PCT level was 0.3 ng/ml (0.2) in neutropenic fever of unknown origin, 0.5 ng/ml (0.7) in microbiologically confirmed infections, 0.2 ng/ml (0.2) in clinically documented infections and 1.7 (4.2) in non-infectious fever (P = not significant). Five days after the antibiotic therapy was started, fever persisted in 29 neutropenic episodes (32%). Cases that were eventually diagnosed with invasive aspergillosis had PCT values significantly higher [10.1 ng/ml (6.7)] than all remaining groups (P = 0.027; Kruskal-Wallis). Our analysis indicates that the PCT level on first day of fever did not facilitate the differential diagnosis of neutropenic febrile episode. However, when fever persisted for more than 5 d, PCT values > or = 3 ng/ml had a high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis.     

An assessment of the efficacy of antimicrobial prophylaxis in bone marrow autografts.

Fifty-three patients undergoing autologous bone marrow transplantation received antimicrobial prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin with or without erythromycin and low dose intravenous amphotericin B. Eight patients remained afebrile throughout the neutropenic period. All other patients had one or more febrile episodes. The median time to fever after the onset of neutropenia was 7 days. There were no gram-negative organisms isolated from blood cultures during any of these episodes whereas gram-positive organisms were isolated in 28. There was one death in this series associated with sepsis. The use of low-dose prophylactic parenteral amphotericin did not prevent the subsequent successful use of full dose amphotericin for antibiotic-resistant fever. Ciprofloxacin effectively prevents gram-negative sepsis. The addition of erythromycin does little to prevent gram-positive sepsis. The use of regimens with agents with activity against gram-positive organisms is appropriate initial treatment of all febrile neutropenic episodes.     

Randomized trial of empiric antibiotic therapy with ticarcillin in combination with gentamicin, amikacin or netilmicin in febrile patients with granulocytopenia and cancer.

A randomized trial of ticarcillin plus gentamicin (group 1), ticarcillin plus amikacin (group 2) and ticarcillin plus netilmicin (group 3) as empiric antibiotic therapy in patients with granulocytopenia and cancer was carried out at the Baltimore Cancer Research Center. The response rate for all infections was 97 per cent in group 1, 91 per cent in group 2 and 95 per cent in group 3. Patients with bacteremias showed improvement in 93 per cent (group 1), 78 per cent (group 2) and 82 per cent (group 3) of cases. All failures were among patients with gram-negative bacteremias. Both antibiotic susceptibility of the bacteremic organism and granulocyte recovery correlated with patient improvement. Nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity were rare and were not significantly different in three groups of patients. Therefore, ticarcillin plus gentamicin, ticarcillin plus amikacin and ticarcillin plus netilmicin appear to be equally efficacious and minimally toxic in this patient population. Excellent over-all results can be expected with these combinations provided the etiologic agent is susceptible.