Mucopurulent cervicitis: no longer ignored, but still misunderstood

The last decade has produced considerable advances in the diagnosis of the common etiologies of mucopurulent cervicitis (MPC), including Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and in the delineation of key aspects of their pathogenesis. Despite this, clear understanding of why these bacteria cause cervical inflammation in a minority of women who is infected with either organism is limited. Furthermore, many women who have MPC have neither of these infections detected, even when highly sensitive diagnostic tests are used. This article describes current data regarding this common condition, and charts new developments that might inform a more comprehensive understanding of MPC and its management, and of the more subtle signs of cervical inflammation that may impact women's susceptibility to a variety of infectious diseases, including HIV-1.     

Substandard medicines in resource-poor settings: a problem that can no longer be ignored

The circulation of substandard medicines in the developing world is a serious clinical and public health concern. Problems include under or over concentration of ingredients, contamination, poor quality ingredients, poor stability and inadequate packaging. There are multiple causes. Drugs manufactured for export are not regulated to the same standard as those for domestic use, while regulatory agencies in the less-developed world are poorly equipped to assess and address the problem. A number of recent initiatives have been established to address the problem, most notably the WHO pre-qualification programme. However, much more action is required. Donors should encourage their partners to include more explicit quality requirements in their tender mechanisms, while purchasers should insist that producers and distributors supply drugs that comply with international quality standards. Governments in rich countries should not tolerate the export of substandard pharmaceutical products to poor countries, while developing country governments should improve their ability to detect substandard medicines.     

Imaging in rheumatoid arthritis--why MRI and ultrasonography can no longer be ignored

Implementing the modern treatment strategy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), i.e. early initiation and optimal adjustments of aggressive therapies, requires methods for early diagnosis and sensitive monitoring of the disease process. In rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials and routine management, conventional radiography is the pivotal method for diagnosing and monitoring structural joint damage. However, it is insensitive to bone damage at its earliest stages and totally incapable of capturing the primary feature of rheumatoid disease, the synovitis. In comparison with radiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers assessment of bone damage with improved sensitivities to early pathology and to change. In addition, detailed assessment of soft tissue changes, including synovitis and tenosynovitis, is possible and MRI findings are of prognostic value for the long-term radiological outcome. Ultrasonography (US) is less validated than MRI, but available data suggests that US offers comparable information on both inflammatory and destructive changes in RA finger and toe joints. Issues of reliability, standardization and documentation limit its value in clinical trials, This article reviews current knowledge on conventional radiography, computed tomography, MRI and US for assessment of peripheral joints in RA. The rationale is provided for MRI being the new gold standard for assessment of RA joints and US becoming a routine bedside tool for improved joint assessments and injections by rheumatologists. Pursuing the goal of improving patient care and disease outcome, rheumatologists can no longer afford to ignore MRI and US as means to measure disease activity and joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis.     

Dracunculiasis eradication: neglected no longer

This report summarizes the status of the global Dracunculiasis Eradication Program as of early 2008. By the end of 2007, dracunculiasis (Guinea worm disease) transmission had been eliminated from 15 of the 20 countries where the disease was endemic in 1986, only 9,585 cases were reported worldwide, and 2,016 villages still had indigenous cases of the disease. Two of the remaining affected countries (Nigeria and Niger) reported < 100 cases in 2007 and are on the verge of eliminating dracunculiasis if they have not stopped transmission already. Sudan, Ghana, and Mali are addressing their final challenges to interrupting all remaining transmission by the end of 2009.     

Left atrium: no longer neglected.

Left atrial evaluation is strongly linked to the history of cardiac imaging. In the past, the importance of this chamber has been largely downplayed because cineangiography could not visualize it directly. Nowadays echocardiography can easily assess left and right atrial size and function. Left atrial enlargement is frequent in many cardiac diseases. A main determinant of left atrial volume is ventricular diastolic function. It has recently been suggested that left atrial volume might be the morphophysiologic expression of chronic diastolic function. In fact the left atrium is exposed directly to left ventricular diastolic pressure through the open mitral valve and because of its thin wall structure it tends to dilate with increasing pressure. Other important determinants of atrial volume are the degree of ventricular remodeling, mitral regurgitation and the presence of atrial fibrillation. The degree of left atrial enlargement is associated with adverse prognosis in different clinical settings. Patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and with a left atrial volume > 68 ml/m2 have a 3.8-fold risk compared with those with smaller left atrial volume. The predictive value of left atrial volume is independent of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, mitral regurgitation and atrial fibrillation. This is noteworthy because these factors are both determinant of left atrial volume and have a strong impact on outcome. It might be concluded that left atrial volume represents a powerful predictive marker because it is a window allowing comprehensive evaluation of several factors associated with bad prognosis, which are often difficult to document separately.