Targeting Angiogenesis in Advanced Breast Cancer

Angiogenesis, the process of new blood vessel formation, is required for tumor growth and metastasis. There is substantial preclinical and clinical evidence supporting the central role of angiogenesis in tumor formation and metastasis. Thus, the inhibition of angiogenesis may provide more effective treatment for patients with advanced breast cancer. Several chemotherapeutic and hormonal agents routinely used in the treatment of advanced breast cancer have antiangiogenic properties. Novel antiangiogenic agents targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) ligand and receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors are being developed. Recently, a large phase III clinical trial demonstrated a significant benefit in progression-free survival with the addition of anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody bevacizumab to paclitaxel for first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer. This study established that antiangiogenic therapy is effective in breast cancer, and additional studies of bevacizumab and other antiangiogenic agents are underway. This article reviews the evidence for the role of angiogenesis in breast cancer pathogenesis, the challenges of developing antiangiogenic agents, and current agents in clinical trials.     

Targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in the treatment of human malignancy

Over 30 years ago, it was proposed that blocking new blood vessel formation would significantly inhibit solid tumor growth and hence, limit cancer progression. Efforts guided by this philosophy have resulted in a better understanding of the molecular basis of tumor angiogenesis. The first successful therapeutic to emerge from this work, an antibody (bevacizumab) targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), was recently approved for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Additional positive clinical data with bevacizumab in the treatment of breast and lung carcinoma have also been reported. These clinical achievements have validated the approach of anti-angiogenesis therapy for cancer and provided further confirmation for antibodies as a therapeutic class in this disease. Nevertheless, important unanswered questions with regard to preclinical and clinical results of VEGF pathway inhibitors remain. For example, preclinical models with a number of VEGF pathway inhibitors suggest that these agents would have significant clinical activity on their own; yet, clinical activity in patients with bevacizumab or other VEGF pathway inhibitors as monotherapy have been disappointing. Moreover, while bevacizumab is approved for the treatment of colorectal cancer in combination with cytotoxics, the mechanism for the benefits of this combination are still poorly understood, with a number of viable mechanisms under active experimental evaluation. The 3-8-month survival benefit in colorectal cancer patients treated with bevacizumab is a positive step forward. However, improving our understanding of the mechanism for these effects, as well as the mechanism underlying the inability as yet to achieve greater effects, is needed in order to follow up on the positive clinical results with improved strategies. This review discusses the experimental results surrounding the current status of our understanding of the mechanism of action of VEGF signaling inhibitors, and the potential for utilizing these agents in the future so that clinical benefits will be measured in years rather than months.     

Targeting the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Pathway in the Treatment of Human Malignancy

Over 30 years ago, it was proposed that blocking new blood vessel formation would significantly inhibit solid tumor growth and hence, limit cancer progression. Efforts guided by this philosophy have resulted in a better understanding of the molecular basis of tumor angiogenesis. The first successful therapeutic to emerge from this work, an antibody (bevacizumab) targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), was recently approved for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Additional positive clinical data with bevacizumab in the treatment of breast and lung carcinoma have also been reported. These clinical achievements have validated the approach of anti-angiogenesis therapy for cancer and provided further confirmation for antibodies as a therapeutic class in this disease. Nevertheless, important unanswered questions with regard to preclinical and clinical results of VEGF pathway inhibitors remain. For example, preclinical models with a number of VEGF pathway inhibitors suggest that these agents would have significant clinical activity on their own; yet, clinical activity in patients with bevacizumab or other VEGF pathway inhibitors as monotherapy have been disappointing. Moreover, while bevacizumab is approved for the treatment of colorectal cancer in combination with cytotoxics, the mechanism for the benefits of this combination are still poorly understood, with a number of viable mechanisms under active experimental evaluation. The 3–8-month survival benefit in colorectal cancer patients treated with bevacizumab is a positive step forward. However, improving our understanding of the mechanism for these effects, as well as the mechanism underlying the inability as yet to achieve greater effects, is needed in order to follow up on the positive clinical results with improved strategies. This review discusses the experimental results surrounding the current status of our understanding of the mechanism of action of VEGF signaling inhibitors, and the potential for utilizing these agents in the future so that clinical benefits will be measured in years rather than months.     

Mechanisms of neovascularization and resistance to anti-angiogenic therapies in glioblastoma multiforme

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most malignant brain tumor and highly resistant to intensive combination therapies. GBM is one of the most vascularized tumors and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) produced by tumor cells is a major factor regulating angiogenesis. Successful results of preclinical studies of anti-angiogenic therapies using xenograft mouse models of human GBM cell lines encouraged clinical studies of anti-angiogenic drugs, such as bevacizumab (Avastin), an anti-VEGF antibody. However, these clinical studies have shown that most patients become resistant to anti-VEGF therapy after an initial response. Recent studies have revealed some resistance mechanisms against anti-VEGF therapies involved in several types of cancer. In this review, we address mechanisms of angiogenesis, including unique features in GBMs, and resistance to anti-VEGF therapies frequently observed in GBM. Enhanced invasiveness is one such resistance mechanism and recent works report the contribution of activated MET signaling induced by inhibition of VEGF signaling. On the other hand, tumor cell-originated neovascularization including tumor-derived endothelial cell-induced angiogenesis and vasculogenic mimicry has been suggested to be involved in the resistance to anti-VEGF therapy. Therefore, these mechanisms should be targeted in addition to anti-angiogenic therapies to achieve better results for patients with GBM.     

A potential therapeutic strategy for inhibition of corneal neovascularization with new anti-VEGF agents

The factors triggering corneal neovascularization involve various growth factors. The data supporting a causal role for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in corneal neovascularization are extensive. One possible strategy for treating corneal neovascularization is to inhibit VEGF activity by competitively binding VEGF with a specific neutralizing anti-VEGF antibody. The vireo-retinal service in the recent years enjoyed a high level of success in managing choroidal neovascularization using anti-VEGF strategies. Efficacy and tolerability have been demonstrated for drugs targeting VEGF. We herein hypothesize that topical application of new anti-VEGF agents such as pegaptanib, ranibizumab and bevacizumab are potentially useful for inhibiting corneal neovascularization and restoration of corneal clarity. Further investigations are needed to place these medical treatments alongside corneal neovascularization therapeutics.     

Localization of vascular endothelial growth factor-D in malignant melanoma suggests a role in tumour angiogenesis

Expression of angiogenic and lymphangiogenic factors by tumours may influence the route of metastatic spread. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a regulator of tumour angiogenesis, but studies of the inhibition of solid tumour growth by neutralizing anti-VEGF antibodies indicated that other angiogenic factors may be involved. VEGF-D may be an alternative regulator because like VEGF it is angiogenic and it activates VEGF receptor-2 (VEGFR-2), an endothelial cell receptor which is a key signalling molecule in tumour angiogenesis. This study reports the generation of monoclonal antibodies to the receptor-binding domain of VEGF-D and the use of these antibodies to localize VEGF-D in malignant melanoma. VEGF-D was detected in tumour cells and in vessels adjacent to immunopositive tumour cells, but not in vessels distant from the tumours. These findings are consistent with a model in which VEGF-D, secreted by tumour cells, activates endothelial cell receptors and thereby contributes to the regulation of tumour angiogenesis and possibly lymphangiogenesis. In addition, VEGF-D was detected in the vascular smooth muscle, but not the endothelium, of vessels in adult colon. The endothelium of these vessels was negative for VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3. As VEGF receptors can be up-regulated on endothelium in response to vessel damage and ischaemia, these findings of a specific localization of VEGF-D in smooth muscle of the blood vessels suggest that VEGF-D produced by vascular smooth muscle could play a role in vascular repair by stimulating the proliferation of endothelial cells.     

Bevacizumab-Induced Hypertension

Bevacizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), has been approved in the US as first- and second-line treatment of colorectal cancer and in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. The US FDA has also granted approval for the use of bevacizumab for the treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and glioblastoma, and in Europe, it is also approved in metastatic breast cancer in combination with paclitaxel. Bevacizumab is under investigation in the first-line and adjuvant setting of almost all types of solid tumors. However, anti-VEGF therapy is associated with significant toxicity. The incidence of grade 3-4 hypertension differs among the various malignancies in which bevacizumab is administered, possibly because of drug interactions with co-administered chemotherapy drugs. Hypertension appears to be dose dependent, and it is under investigation as a biomarker for VEGF inhibition efficacy. There are three main theories concerning the underlying pathophysiology: (i) the nitric oxide theory; (ii) the renal impairment theory; and (iii) the pre-eclampsia-like theory. The correct evaluation of the levels of hypertension is of critical importance and home blood pressure monitoring seems to be the most effective technique. A baseline assessment and follow-up monitoring of blood pressure is considered necessary for all patients receiving bevacizumab. There are no evidence-based recommendations regarding which antihypertensives are more appropriate for the management of bevacizumab-related hypertension. It has been suggested that the benefits from antihypertensive treatment are largely independent of the drugs used, as long as they adequately lower blood pressure. Randomized prospective studies are necessary to provide data that will be useful for the development of specific guidelines for the management of bevacizumab-related hypertension. In the meantime, treatment of anti-VEGF-induced hypertension should follow current guidelines for diagnosis and management of hypertension in general.     

Normalization of the vasculature for treatment of cancer and other diseases

New vessel formation (angiogenesis) is an essential physiological process for embryologic development, normal growth, and tissue repair. Angiogenesis is tightly regulated at the molecular level. Dysregulation of angiogenesis occurs in various pathologies and is one of the hallmarks of cancer. The imbalance of pro- and anti-angiogenic signaling within tumors creates an abnormal vascular network that is characterized by dilated, tortuous, and hyperpermeable vessels. The physiological consequences of these vascular abnormalities include temporal and spatial heterogeneity in tumor blood flow and oxygenation and increased tumor interstitial fluid pressure. These abnormalities and the resultant microenvironment fuel tumor progression, and also lead to a reduction in the efficacy of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy. With the discovery of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) as a major driver of tumor angiogenesis, efforts have focused on novel therapeutics aimed at inhibiting VEGF activity, with the goal of regressing tumors by starvation. Unfortunately, clinical trials of anti-VEGF monotherapy in patients with solid tumors have been largely negative. Intriguingly, the combination of anti-VEGF therapy with conventional chemotherapy has improved survival in cancer patients compared with chemotherapy alone. These seemingly paradoxical results could be explained by a "normalization" of the tumor vasculature by anti-VEGF therapy. Preclinical studies have shown that anti-VEGF therapy changes tumor vasculature towards a more "mature" or "normal" phenotype. This "vascular normalization" is characterized by attenuation of hyperpermeability, increased vascular pericyte coverage, a more normal basement membrane, and a resultant reduction in tumor hypoxia and interstitial fluid pressure. These in turn can lead to an improvement in the metabolic profile of the tumor microenvironment, the delivery and efficacy of exogenously administered therapeutics, the efficacy of radiotherapy and of effector immune cells, and a reduction in number of metastatic cells shed by tumors into circulation in mice. These findings are consistent with data from clinical trials of anti-VEGF agents in patients with various solid tumors. More recently, genetic and pharmacological approaches have begun to unravel some other key regulators of vascular normalization such as proteins that regulate tissue oxygen sensing (PHD2) and vessel maturation (PDGFRβ, RGS5, Ang1/2, TGF-β). Here, we review the pathophysiology of tumor angiogenesis, the molecular underpinnings and functional consequences of vascular normalization, and the implications for treatment of cancer and nonmalignant diseases.     

Spotlight on Bevacizumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancel

Bevacizumab (Avastin((R))) is a recombinant, humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) that is used to inhibit VEGF function in vascular endothelial cells and thereby inhibit tumor angiogenesis, upon which solid tumors depend for growth and metastasis.The addition of bevacizumab to fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy, with or without irinotecan or oxaliplatin, in both the first- and second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, significantly increased median progression-free survival or time to disease progression in most randomized controlled trials. Bevacizumab was generally, but not always, associated with a survival advantage; in phase III trials, the increases in median overall survival attributable to bevacizumab were 4.7 months with first-line therapy and 2.1 months with second-line therapy. In some studies, patients experienced clinical improvement without an apparent overall survival benefit. Bevacizumab had acceptable tolerability, with the majority of adverse events being generally mild and clinically manageable. However, from the UK National Health Service perspective, bevacizumab was not considered to be cost effective in combination with bolus fluorouracil/leucovorin (folinic acid) or irinotecan/bolus fluorouracil/leucovorin. Additional pharmacoeconomic analyses from different perspectives and using clinical data for combinations with the more efficacious infusional fluorouracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin or irinotecan chemotherapy regimens are required. Although cost effectiveness may be a concern, the combination of bevacizumab and fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy has potential in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.     

Bevacizumab attenuates major signaling cascades and eIF4E translation initiation factor in multiple myeloma cells

Multiple myeloma (MM), a malignancy of plasma cells, remains fatal despite introduction of novel therapies, partially due to humoral factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), in their microenvironment. The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy of anti-VEGF treatment with bevacizumab directly on MM cells. Particular attention was directed to the affect of VEGF inhibition on protein translation initiation. Experiments were conducted on MM cells (lines, bone marrow (BM) samples) cultured on plastic. Inhibition of VEGF was achieved with the clinically employed anti-VEGF antibody, bevacizumab, as a platform and its consequences on viability, proliferation, and survival was assessed. VEGF downstream signals of established importance to MM cell biology were assayed as well, with particular emphasis on translation initiation factor eIF4E. We showed that blocking VEGF is deleterious to the MM cells and causes cytostasis. This was evidenced in MM cell lines, as well as in primary BM samples (BM MM). A common bevacizumab-induced attenuation of critical signaling effectors was determined: VEGFR1, mTOR, c-Myc, Akt, STAT3, (cell lines) and eIF4E translation initiation factor (lines and BM). ERK1/2 displayed a variegated response to bevacizumab (lines). Utilizing a constitutively Akt-expressing MM model, we showed that the effect of bevacizumab on viability and eIF4E status is Akt-dependent. Of note, the effect of bevacizumab was achieved with high concentrations (2 mg/ml), but was shown to be specific. These findings demonstrate that bevacizumab has a direct influence on major pathways critically activated in MM that is independent from its established effect on angiogenesis. The cytostatic effect of VEGF inhibition on MM cells underscores its potential in combined therapy, and our findings, regarding its influence on translation initiation, suggest that drugs that unbalance cellular proteostasis may be particularly effective.     

VEGF受体结合抑制肽的筛选及其特性鉴定

目的　筛选能抑制VEGF与血管内皮细胞表面受体结合的VEGF模拟短肽 ,探讨小分子短肽作为血管内皮细胞生长抑制剂、肿瘤疫苗的可行性。方法　以抗 VEGF单克隆抗体分别对噬菌体随机 7肽、12肽库进行筛选。通过硝酸纤维膜斑点印迹法进行阳性克隆鉴定。用噬菌体克隆免疫小鼠检验这种短肽可否模拟VEGF的抗原决定簇诱发机体产生能与VEGF结合的抗体 ,研究小鼠抗血清、噬菌体表达的 7肽和 12肽以及人工合成 7肽对人脐静脉血管内皮细胞 (HUVEC)生长的抑制作用。结果　对肽库进行 3轮筛选后 ,噬菌体克隆具有良好的富集效果。硝酸纤维膜斑点印迹法证实阳性率达到 10 0 % ,测序结果显示噬菌体上的短肽有共同序列 :GWYYDAL、VASAVFYSALVE。这两种噬菌体短肽免疫小鼠能激发产生高效价的抗 VEGF抗体。噬菌体表达的 7肽和 12肽对HUVEC的生长有明显的抑制作用。由短肽GWYYDAL阳性克隆免疫的抗血清对VEGF诱导的内皮细胞生长起抑制作用 ,人工合成的 7肽 (GWYYDAL)呈剂量依赖性阻拮VEGF促HUVEC增殖作用。结论　从噬菌体肽库中筛选到的噬菌体短肽GWYYDAL、VASAVFYSALVE模拟了VEGF的抗原表位 ,为研究VEGF受体结合抑制肽和设计肿瘤疫苗奠定了实验基础。     

The possible role of chemotherapy in antiangiogenic drug resistance

The use of antiangiogenic drugs for cancer treatment was welcomed because of the hypothesis that they would be much less likely to lose their therapeutic activity as a result of tumor-acquired resistance over time. Unfortunately, the clinical experience has shown that acquired resistance to antiangiogenic therapeutic strategies is possible since many patients whose tumors initially respond to drugs such as bevacizumab (a monoclonal antibody against VEGF), sorafenib, or sunitinib (tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting VEGF receptors and PDGF receptors) or metronomic chemotherapy (e.g. low dose cyclophosphamide) become nonresponsive, often within months of therapy initiation. Indeed, the role of associated antineoplastic chemotherapy in antiangiogenic resistance seems to be ignored by the previous studies and the real part played by these drugs has to be written yet. The studies undertaken on antiangiogenic resistance mainly involved mechanisms directly related to the antiangiogenic drugs alone and as such lead one to ask whether the acquired resistance to angiogenesis pathway-targeting might also be mediated by the chemotherapeutic drugs usually associated (at least into the clinic) with these types of drugs. The proposed hypothesis is concerning the possibility that the acquired resistance to antiangiogenic therapy could be actively and heavily modulated by the choice of the associated chemotherapeutic drug. The chemotherapeutic compounds may delay or accelerate the process through the induction, upregulation or downregulation of pro-angiogenic or anti-angiogenic factors or their receptors in the tumor, endothelial and other type of cells of the tumor microenvironment. In conclusion, the consequences of our hypothesis could be promptly translated into the preclinical studies and verified in clinical trials, involving cancer patients resistant to chemotherapy plus antiangiogenic drug schedules.     

Targeted therapies in gynaecological cancers

The treatment of cancer has changed dramatically over the last decade, driven by increased understanding of the cancer genome, immune landscape, molecular alterations and aberrant pathways that drive cancer progression. Advances in molecular biology have led to the development of targeted agents, including monoclonal antibodies, small molecules and check-point inhibitors. Unlike chemotherapy, which inhibits DNA replication and mitosis, these agents target cancer signalling pathways, stroma, immune microenvironment and vasculature in tumour tissues. In gynaecological cancer, drugs targeting defective DNA repair, such as PARP inhibitors, have been approved for advanced ovarian cancer, and drugs targeting angiogenesis have been used in the treatment of advanced or recurrent ovarian and cervical cancers. Immune check-point inhibitors such as anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies have proved successful for mismatch repair-deficient endometrial cancers and HPV-targeted therapies are under development for HPV-related malignancies. In this era of precision medicine, improved understanding of cancer biology and genomics needs to be utilised to develop predictive biomarkers for these targeted therapies to maximise patient benefit.     

Itraconazole: Its possible role in inhibiting angiogenesis in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, inflammatory, autoimmune disorder involving mainly synovial joints. It can progress to a severely debilitating form with pulmonary, renal and cardiovascular involvement. Currently, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) remain the gold standard pharmacological therapy for RA (along with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids). However, DMARDs are more or less ineffective in the late phase of the disease and adverse effects often limit their use. Studies show that serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) remain elevated throughout the course of RA. In experimental models, the administration of pro-angiogenic cytokines, such as VEGF or FGF, has been shown to increase the severity of the disease. Therefore, anti-angiogenic drugs such as bevacizumab (which is already being used as an anti-tumor agent) may play a significant role in longstanding RA. However, adverse effects such as hypertension, gastro-intestinal perforation and the high cost of bevacizumab are major concerns. A recent study suggests that itraconazole, an antifungal drug, has a role in selectively inhibiting angiogenesis and growth of tumor in non-small cell lung cancer. Hence, this drug may be beneficial in the treatment of RA, especially in the later phase when other modalities have failed, or as an adjuvant. To test our hypothesis, we propose a randomized, double-blinded trial in patients with longstanding RA. The control group receives the standard DMARD therapy plus placebo, while the case group receives itraconazole in addition to DMARD therapy. Serum and synovial VEGF levels, in both the control group and the case group, are compared and their correlation with the symptoms is judged. If the VEGF levels are lower and/or the symptoms are less severe in the case group, our hypothesis will be confirmed. Multi-institutional efforts are needed to confirm this hypothesis, as it is relatively new and trial data is limited.     

Decreased peritherapeutic VEGF expression could be a predictor of responsiveness to first-line FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in mCRC patients

Objective: Bevacizumab is the only anti-angiogenic agent approved in first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Although chemotherapy plus bevacizumab has led to improve outcomes for mCRC patients and is a common choice for first-line treatment of mCRC, previous research has established no prominent biomarker that can help to select patients who may benefit from bevacizumab in order to improve cost-effectiveness and therapeutic outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare pre- and post-therapeutic VEGF immunohistochemical (IHC) expression in mCRC patients treated with FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab to identify its potential role as a predictive biomarker. Methods: A total of 57 mCRC patients who underwent FOLFIRI combined with bevacizumab chemotherapy as a first-line neoadjuvant regimen were enrolled and clinical outcome data analyzed. Results: Low post-therapeutic VEGF expression (P < 0.001) and decreased peri-therapeutic VEGF expression (P < 0.001) were significantly predictive factors of responders. Furthermore, the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate in mCRC patients with decreased peri-therapeutic VEGF expression was significantly better than the rate for those patients with no peri-therapeutic VEGF expression alterations (P = 0.033). Conclusions: Decreased peri-therapeutic VEGF expression in mCRC patients could probably be used to predict responsiveness to bevacizumab and subsequent PFS in clinical practice.     

Differential drug class-specific metastatic effects following treatment with a panel of angiogenesis inhibitors

Inhibiting angiogenesis has become an important therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment but, like other current targeted therapies, benefits experienced for late-stage cancers can be curtailed by inherent refractoriness or by acquired drug resistance, requiring a need for better mechanistic understanding of such effects. Numerous preclinical studies have demonstrated that VEGF pathway inhibitors suppress primary tumour growth and metastasis. However, it has been recently reported that short-term VEGF and VEGFR inhibition can paradoxically accelerate tumour invasiveness and metastasis in certain models. Here we comprehensively compare the effects of both antibody and small molecule receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) inhibitors targeting the VEGF-VEGFR pathway, using short-term therapy in various mouse models of metastasis. Our findings demonstrate that antibody inhibition of VEGF pathway molecules does not promote metastasis, in contrast to selected small molecule RTK inhibitors at elevated-therapeutic drug dosages. In particular, a multi-targeted RTK inhibitor, sunitinib, which most profoundly potentiated metastasis, also increased lung vascular permeability and promoted tumour cell extravasation. Mechanistically, sunitinib, but not anti-VEGF treatment, attenuated endothelial barrier function in culture and caused a global inhibition of protein tyrosine phosphorylation, including molecules important for maintaining endothelial cell-cell junctions. Together these findings indicate that, rather than a specific consequence of inhibiting the VEGF signalling pathway, pharmacological inhibitors of the VEGF pathway can have dose- and drug class-dependent side-effects on the host vasculature. These findings also advocate for the continued identification of mechanisms of resistance to anti-angiogenics and for therapy development to overcome it.     

骨髓来源免疫细胞对肿瘤血管生成的调节及临床应用研究进展

 近年来研究发现髓系细胞在肿瘤血管生成中发挥关键的调控作用。髓系细胞可以通过多种途径促进血管生成,包括分泌VEGF及不依赖于VEGF的方式,后者参与介导了抗血管生成治疗中肿瘤抵抗性的形成。此外,髓系细胞还限制了放化疗的治疗效果,促进复发。最后,本文初步探讨了其临床应用前景。     

Immunolocalization of VEGF, VEGF receptors, EGF-R and Ki-67 in leiomyoma, cellular leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma

Angiogenic factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), its receptors and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R), are involved in increased progression in many carcinomas. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of angiogenesis and immunolocalization of VEGF, its receptors, EGF-R and Ki 67 in leiomyomas and leiomyosarcomas using an indirect immunohistochemical method. Samples from patients with leiomyoma, cellular leiomyoma and cellular leiomyosarcoma (n=20 per group) were fixed in 10% formalin and processed using routine paraffin protocols. Following initial histological analysis, samples were immunostained with primary antibodies for VEGF, VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, EGF-R and Ki-67 using an indirect avidin-biotin peroxidase method. Immunostaining intensities were evaluated as mild, moderate or strong and a semi-quantitative method (H-Score) was used to compare the samples. While mild/moderate EGF-R immunostaining and moderate immunostaining for VEGF and its receptors were observed in samples of leiomyomas, much less immunoreactivity was observed in cellular leiomyomas. All immunoreactivities and immune-stained cells increased in leiomyosarcomas. When scores of intensity and percentage of positive staining cells were compared, all immunoreactivities were shown to be significantly increased in leiomyosarcomas compared to leiomyomas.These results suggest that in leiomyosarcoma, angiogenic factors, such as VEGF, its receptors and EGF-R, may be involved in tumor angiogenesis. Active tumor cells can trigger angiogenesis, interaction with surrounding tissue and in the tissue itself initiating angiogenic activity. Angiogenic growth factors play an important role and induce malignant transformation through both autocrine and paracrine mechanisms. Anti-angiogenic agents may provide a novel therapeutic approach for the treatment of leiomyosarcoma.