Clinical outcomes of multiple myeloma patients who undergo autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant with G-CSF or G-CSF and plerixafor mobilized grafts

Impact of Plerixafor (P) mobilized stem cells on immune reconstitution, such as absolute lymphocyte count at day 30 (ALC30), and on long-term outcomes of Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has not been well established. We evaluated total of 469 patients mobilized with G-CSF (G) alone, and 141 patients mobilized with G-CSF plus plerixafor (G+ P). Patients only received plerixafor if they had peripheral blood CD34⁺ blood count <20/μL on first planned day of collection. Primary endpoint, ALC30, was 1.3 K/μL (range, 0.1-4.5) and 1.2 K/μL (range, 0.1-5.1) for G and G + P, respectively (P =. 61). The median PFS was 2.5 years (95% CI, 2.1-3.2) and 2.8 years (95% CI, 2.0-3.3) for G and G + P, respectively (HR: 1.13; 95% CI, 0.84-1.50; P = .42). The median OS was 6.1 years (95% CI, 4.6-NR) for G group compared to 3.7 years (95% CI, 3.2-NR) for the G + P group (HR: 1.64; 95% CI, 1.12-2.40; P = .01). The median follow-up time for OS was 2.53 years (95% CI, 2.13-2.99) and 1.59 years (95% CI, 1.17-2.02) for G and G+ P group, respectively. In this large retrospective analysis of MM patients mobilized with G-CSF vs G-CSF + P, there was no significant difference in lymphocyte recovery or PFS. There was an overall survival difference in patients who were poor mobilizers and could not be mobilized with G-CSF alone.     

Haematopoietic stem cell mobilization with plerixafor and G-CSF in patients with multiple myeloma transplanted with autologous stem cells

A proportion of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who have already undergone autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) might benefit from a further transplantation. For this, they might need to undergo another round of stem cell mobilization. We analyzed retrospectively the outcomes of stem cell mobilization with plerixafor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in a group of 30 patients who had undergone autoSCT previously, and in 46 other patients. The previously transplanted patients were significantly different from the remaining patients with respect to the intensity and number of previous therapies. We observed that the median peripheral blood concentration of CD34+ cells after the first administration of plerixafor was lower in previously transplanted (19 cells/μL) than in other patients (30 cells/μL, P < 0.05). Despite a comparable number of apheresis sessions being performed, the median total yield of CD34+ cells was significantly lower in the previously transplanted than in the remaining patients (2.8 × 10(6) cells/kg vs. 4.2 × 10(6) cells/kg, P < 0.05). However, successful collection of at least 2.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg was achieved finally in a similar proportion of previously transplanted and other patients (70% vs. 82.6%). Our data suggest that stem cell mobilization with plerixafor and G-CSF might overcome the negative effect of prognostic factors for poor stem cell mobilization in patients with MM who have undergone autoSCT previously.     

波替单抗治疗伴或不伴有肾功能不全的老年多发性骨髓瘤

目的：通过回顾性分析波替单抗（硼替佐米）为主的化疗方案治疗老年多发性骨髓瘤（MM）患者的治疗结果,探讨其治疗效果、不良反应及对合并肾功能不全患者的疗效。方法对2007年1月至2012年12月在解放军总医院第一附属医院住院治疗的46例老年MM患者进行回顾性分析,依据肾功能是否正常将患者分为肾功能不全组14例,肾功能正常组32例;依据是否初治分为初治组25例,复治组21例。分别采用波替单抗为主的化疗方案治疗,比较各组患者治疗2个疗程及4个疗程后的总反应率（ORR）,并统计治疗后的相关不良反应。结果46例患者中,治疗2个疗程后初治组ORR为88.0%（22/25）,复治组ORR为76.2%（16/21）,但差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。4个疗程后初治组ORR为90.0%（9/10）,复治组ORR为75.0%（15/20）,两组间差异有统计学意义（P＜0.01）。完成4个疗程时肾功能不全组ORR为90.9%（10/11）,肾功能正常组ORR为73.7%（14/19）,两组间差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。治疗相关的不良反应包括末梢神经炎、胃肠道反应、血小板减少等,对症处理后均可控制。结论波替单抗为主的化疗方案治疗老年MM患者疗效显著,疗效随疗程增加逐渐提高。对于合并肾功能不全老年患者,尽早使用波替单抗为主的化疗方案,可纠正肾功能不全,改善患者生活质量。含波替单抗的化疗方案在该组老年患者治疗中有较好的安全性。     

Effect of thalidomide on stem cell collection and engraftment in patients with multiple myeloma

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of thalidomide on stem cell collection and engraftment in patients with multiple myeloma. We performed a retrospective review of 67 patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma at Mayo Clinic and treated with a single regimen prior to stem cell transplantation between January of 2000 and September of 2001. Stem cells were collected from 24 patients who received thalidomide, 200 mg/day, with dexamethasone as initial therapy before stem cell collection. These patients were compared with 43 control patients seen during the same period who had received only one previous regimen before stem cell collection and transplantation. The cumulative thalidomide dose before stem cell collection was 17 000 mg over a median of four cycles (range, 2-7 cycles). The thalidomide and control groups were not significantly different in their baseline characteristics, number of stem cells collected, time to collection, or time to engraftment of neutrophils or platelet count of 50 000/microl. Time to platelet count of 20 000/microl was delayed by a median of 4 days (P=0.008), but platelet transfusion requirements did not differ (P=0.95). We concluded that thalidomide does not substantially affect peripheral cell mobilization or engraftment.     

Autologous stem cell transplantation followed by consolidation chemotherapy for patients with multiple myeloma

Although high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is superior to conventional chemotherapy for treatment of myeloma, most patients relapse and the time to relapse depends upon the initial prognostic factors. The administration of non-cross-resistant chemotherapies during the post-transplant period may delay or prevent relapse. We prospectively studied the role of consolidation chemotherapy (CC) after single autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant (auto-PBSCT) in 103 mostly newly diagnosed myeloma patients (67 patients were < or =6 months from the initial treatment). Patients received conditioning with BCNU, melphalan+/-gemcitabine and auto-PBSCT followed by two cycles of the DCEP+/-G regimen (dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, cisplatin+/-gemcitabine) at 3 and 9 months post-transplant and alternating with two cycles of DPP regimen (dexamethasone, cisplatin, paclitaxel) at 6 and 12 months post-transplant. With a median follow-up of 61.2 months, the median event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) are 26 and 54.1 months, respectively. The 5-year EFS and OS are 23.1 and 42.5%, respectively. Overall, 51 (49.5%) patients finished all CC, suggesting that a major limitation of this approach is an inability to deliver all planned treatments. In order to improve results following autotransplantation, novel agents or immunologic approaches should be studied in the post-transplant setting.     

Clinical features and survival of 338 multiple myeloma patients treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or conventional chemotherapy

Therapeutic approaches against multiple myeloma (MM) have largely changed during the past decade. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and licensing of immunomodulators and proteasome inhibitors have resulted in better response and increased overall survival rates compared to previous conventional therapies. To assess the impact that these new strategies have had on outcome of patients with symptomatic MM in Spain, we conducted an epidemiological retrospective analysis of 338 newly diagnosed patients with stage II‐III MM who started first‐line treatment over a 2‐yr period (2003–2005) by collecting data from their medical records. Most patients had been diagnosed with secretory MM (94.4%), 41.7% stage II and 58.3% stage III. The presence of bone lesions (72.2%), as well as anemia (79.8%) and elevated beta2‐microglobulin levels (62.3%), was a common finding; in contrast, hypercalcemia and elevated serum creatinine were less frequent (25% each). First‐line treatment had consisted of either conventional chemotherapy (62%) or induction treatment plus autologous HSCT (38%), as per standard clinical practice. HSCT not only resulted in greater objective response rates (93% vs. 50%), but also contributed to a significant increase in 3‐yr survival (85% vs. 49.7%; 95% CI, range 77–91 vs. 41–58; P < 0.001). Overall, 55% of patients presented treatment‐related adverse events, mainly hematological. Toxicity rates were higher among patients treated with alkylating‐based regimens and in those undergoing transplantation. In conclusion, data analysis shows an adequate balance between increased response rates and safety that supports the use of up‐front high‐dose HSCT therapy in younger patients. Most importantly, this study provides further confirmation that the introduction of HSCT has significantly prolonged survival of patients with MM.     

Single-centre experience with nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma: prolonged remissions induced

BACKGROUND: The role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma is not yet established. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the outcome of nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation (NMA) in patients with multiple myeloma treated at the Department of Haematology of the University Medical Centre Utrecht. Thirty-six patients received NMA as part of the first-line treatment; 23 patients as part of salvage therapy. Conditioning regimen was low-dose total body irradiation (TBI, 2 Grays) only; fludarabine was added in patients without previous autologous stem cell transplantation and patients with matched unrelated donors received antithymocyte globulin in addition to fludarabine and TBI. RESULTS: Following NMA overall response increased from 84 to 90%, complete remission rate from 15 to 32%. As part of first-line treatment NMA induced complete remission in 50% of patients vs one patient (4%) treated for relapsed multiple myeloma. Median progression-free survival was 26 months (13 months for the salvage group, 38 months for the 'upfront' patients). Median overall survival has not been reached yet. The achievement of complete remission following NMA as part of first-line treatment was associated with prolonged progression-free and overall survival. Major toxicities were acute and chronic graft-vs-host disease occurring in 64% (23% grade 3-4) and in 54% (49% extensive) patients, respectively. Seven patients (12%) died from nonrelapse mortality, five patients (9%) directly related to toxicity of NMA. CONCLUSION: NMA in multiple myeloma is feasible, is associated with acceptable nonrelapse mortality and may induce prolonged complete remission. In pretreated patients the result of NMA is disappointing which urges new strategies.     

Tandem autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma after high-dose chemotherapy with two separate collections: single institution experience

Presented is a retrospective analysis of multiple myeloma patients transplanted at our institution between November 1993 and August 2007. The objective of this analysis was to assess the feasibility and toxicity of tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (T-ASCT) when stem cells were harvested before first and before second transplantation separately. A total of 90 patients transplanted in our center were analyzed, of whom 43 patients were in tandem transplantation group.The overall response rate (ORR) was 83.7% and 95.1%, estimated five-year overall survival (OS) was 40.1% and 60.0%, probability of five-year event-free survival (EFS) was 18.2% and 25.6%, transplant related mortality (TRM) was 6.3% and 4.6% in the single and tandem transplant group, respectively. In multivariable analysis of all 90 patients, tandem transplantation and ORR attained after induction therapy were favourable prognostic factors for OS (p=0.024 and p=0.002) and EFS (p=0.036 and p=0.008), respectively. In conclusion, tandem transplantation with two separate stem cell harvests, performed separately before the each transplantation, is feasible in majority of patients with acceptable toxicity.     

Infectious complications after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation: comparison between patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma and patients with solid tumors

From November 1994 to May 1998, 117 patients (66 with solid tumor, 36 with lymphoma, 14 with multiple myeloma, one with acute leukemia) underwent 178 cycles of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) at our institution. We retrospectively analyzed the infectious complications that occurred after ASCT. Median duration of neutropenia (granulocyte count <0.5 x 10(9)/l ) was 8 days, the overall incidence of fever requiring antimicrobial treatment was 63%. 35.4% of patients had fever of unknown orign (FUO), whereas primary bacteremia occurred in 21.3%, pneumonia in 3.4% and severe skin infection in 1.1% of patients. Invasive fungal infections occurred in three, and enterocolitis in one patient. Infection was fatal in three patients (2.6%), in each case due to septic shock. The most frequently isolated pathogens were Gram-positive cocci. Median time to defervescence with antimicrobial therapy was 4 days (6 days in patients with bacteremia or other severe infection, and 3 days in patients with FUO). First-line antimicrobial therapy was successful in 65% of patients with FUO and 30.6% of patients with documented infections. With respect to the incidence, type and clinical course of infection, no significant differences between patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma and those with solid tumors were detected.     

Hematopoietic stem cell mobilization with intravenous melphalan and G-CSF in patients with chemoresponsive multiple myeloma: report of a phase II trial

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable hematologic malignancy for which autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is a standard therapy. The optimal method of stem cell mobilization is not defined. We evaluated intravenous melphalan (60 mg/m2), the most effective agent for MM, and G-CSF (10 microg/kg/day) for mobilization. End points were safety, adequacy of CD34+ collections, MM response, and contamination of stem cell components (SCC). In total, 32 patients were mobilized. There were no deaths or significant bleeding episodes; 14 patients (44%) required hospitalization for neutropenic fever. Median days of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia were 7 (2-20) and 8 (3-17). Median mobilization days, CD34+ cells/kg and total leukaphereses were 16 (12-30), 12.1 million (2.6-52.8), and 2 (1-5) respectively. Four patients (12.5 %) failed to achieve the target of 4 million CD34+ cells/kg in five leukaphereses. Reduction in myeloma was seen in 11 patients (34%) with 3 (9%) achieving complete response; 15 (47%) maintained prior responses. Estimated MM contamination per SCC (N=48) was 0.0009% (range 0-0.1) and 0.21 x 10(4) cells per kg (range 0-41.2). Increased contamination was associated with increased patient age. This strategy for mobilization is feasible, frequently requires hospitalization and transfusion, and controls disease in most patients.     

Sustained G-CSF plasma levels following administration of pegfilgrastim fasten neutrophil reconstitution after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous blood stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma

OBJECTIVE: Pegfilgrastim has shown to decrease the duration of severe neutropenia after conventional chemotherapy, but its use after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous blood stem cell transplantation has not been established yet. Therefore we studied the efficacy and the pharmacokinetic profile of pegfilgrastim in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing high-dose chemotherapy. METHOD: In total, 21 patients received a single subcutaneous injection of 6 mg pegfilgrastim on day +1 after transplantation and pegfilgrastim plasma levels were measured daily by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Clinical outcome was compared with pegfilgrastim levels of 282 plasma samples and data of a historical control group of patients without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. RESULTS: Pegfilgrastim levels showed an inverse correlation (r = -0.68, p < 0.01) with neutrophil counts. Peak levels were reached at day +4 (94 ng/mL; range: 37-205) and were maintained until day +7 (85 ng/mL; range: 35-186). Comparison with the control group without G-CSF support showed that time to neutrophil reconstitution was significantly shorter in the pegfilgrastim group with 10 vs 15 days, respectively (p < 0.001). There was no correlation of pegfilgrastim levels and the duration of neutropenia, although patients with a fivefold increase in neutrophil counts the day after pegfilgrastim administration had a significantly shorter median duration of neutropenia in comparison to patients who were less susceptible to G-CSF stimulation (5 vs 7 days, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Neutrophil reconstitution after high-dose chemotherapy could be accelerated by the use of pegfilgrastim in patients with myeloma. Responsiveness of neutrophils to pegfilgrastim before neutropenia was correlated with faster neutrophil reconstitution, whereas G-CSF levels had no impact on neutrophil recovery.     

Successful transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells mobilized by chemotherapy and a single dose of pegylated G-CSF in patients with multiple myeloma

Following induction therapy and 4 g/m(2) cyclophosphamide, a single dose of 12 mg polyethyleneglycol-conjugated G-CSF (pegfilgrastim; n=12) or daily doses of unconjugated G-CSF (8.5 mug/kg/day) (n=12) were administered to myeloma patients. Pegfilgrastim was associated with an earlier leukocyte recovery (12 vs 14 days) and peripheral blood CD34+ cell peak (12 vs 15 days). The peripheral blood CD34+ cell peak was lower in the pegfilgrastim group (78 vs 111/mul). Following high-dose melphalan (200 mg/m(2)) and autografting, leukocyte and platelet reconstitution was similar in both groups and stable blood counts were observed 100 days post transplant. In summary, a single dose of pegfilgrastim after chemotherapy is capable of mobilizing a sufficient number of CD34+ cells for successful autografting with early engraftment and sustained hematological reconstitution in patients with myeloma. These data provide the basis for randomized studies evaluating the optimal dose and time of pegfilgrastim as well as long-term outcome in larger cohorts of patients.     

Efficient mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells following CAD chemotherapy and a single dose of pegylated G-CSF in patients with multiple myeloma

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous blood stem cell transplantation is the standard treatment for myeloma patients. In this study, CAD (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, dexamethasone) chemotherapy and a single dose of pegfilgrastim (12 mg) was highly effective in mobilizing peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) for subsequent transplantation, with 88% of patients (n = 26) achieving the CD34+ cell harvest target of > or = 7.50 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg body weight, following a median of two apheresis procedures (range 1-4) and with first apheresis performed at a median day 13 after CAD application (range 10-20). Patients treated with pegfilgrastim showed a reduced time to first apheresis procedure from mobilization compared with filgrastim-mobilized historical matched controls (n = 52, P = 0.015). The pegfilgrastim mobilization regimen allowed for transplantation of a median of 3.58 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg body weight while leaving sufficient stored cells for a second high-dose regimen and back-ups in most patients. Engraftment following transplantation was comparable to filgrastim, with a median time of 14 days to leucocyte > or =1.0 x 10(9)/l (range 10-21) and 11 days to platelets > or = 20 x 10(9)/l (range 0-15). The results of this study thus provide further support for the clinical utility of pegfilgrastim for the mobilization of PBSC following chemotherapy in cancer patients scheduled for transplantation.     

Blood stem cell collections in multiple myeloma: definition of a scoring system

The purpose of the study was to identify factors that could predict good yields of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in multiple myeloma (MM). Fifty-one MM patients, nine with refractory disease and 42 in plateau phase, were mobilized with high-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-Cy) at 4 g/m2 followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 microg/kg/day. Clinical and laboratory parameters at the time of mobilization were analyzed for correlations with the number of CD34+ cells collected, with the colony-forming unit granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) count, and the mononuclear cell (MNC) count. In univariate analysis, low WBC count, low platelet count, prior exposure to melphalan, and an interval >6 months from the start of treatment correlated with poor yields of CD34+ cells. Low platelet count, prior exposure to melphalan or to radiotherapy, and an interval >6 months from the start of treatment were associated with a low CFU-GM count. On the basis of these data, we defined a scoring system able to predict the yield of the mobilizing procedure. According to this system, the presence of more than one risk factor (low WBC and platelet counts, prior exposure to melphalan, interval from first chemotherapy >6 months) was predictive of insufficient collections when a conventional combination of mobilizing measures are used.     

Long-term follow up of patients with multiple myeloma after high-dose chemotherapy and allogeneic stem cell transplantation

OBJECTIVES: Allogeneic transplantation may offer a curative approach to multiple myeloma (MM). We retrospectively analyzed the outcome of patients with multiple myeloma undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation in the context of beta(2) microglobulin and chromosome 13q. METHODS: All 13 patients with MM, who were referred to our center for allogeneic stem cell transplantation, were evaluated. Median age of patients was 38 yr, eight patients had chemo-sensitive disease, and median time between diagnosis of MM and transplantation was 15 months. Engraftment, acute and chronic graft vs. host disease, response to treatment, disease-free survival, and overall survival were evaluated according to standard criteria. RESULTS: There was one transplant-related death. Among 12 evaluable patients, seven patients (58%) achieved a complete remission (CR), and four patients (33%) achieved a partial remission. Acute graft vs. host disease occurred in 46% of patients, and chronic graft vs. host disease in 42% of available patients. After a median follow-up of 69.5 months (range, 5-128) nine patients (70%) are still alive, and six of them have remained progression free. Among five patients with low beta(2) microglobulin and normal chromosome 13q, four patients achieved a CR, with CR duration >5 yr in three of them. Among seven patients with elevated ss(2) microglobulin and/or deletion of chromosome 13q, only three CR were observed, with two patients still in CR on days +920 and +161, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with MM results in promising rates of CR, but durable remissions are predominantly seen in patients with favorable prognostic parameters.     

Blood stem cell mobilization and collection in patients with lymphoproliferative diseases: practical issues

More than 15,000 autologous stem cell transplants (ASCT) were reported to European Blood and Bone Marrow Transplantation registry in 2005, most commonly for multiple myeloma (MM) and lymphomas. In 98% of the cases high-dose therapy was supported by blood stem cells. Thus stem cell mobilization and collection are integral parts of ASCT protocols. We give here a practical approach to blood stem cell mobilization and collection in patients with various lymphoproliferative diseases. While mobilization is usually easy and straightforward in patients with MM, about 10-20% of patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or Hodgkin's lymphoma are hard-to-mobilize. There seems to be even more disease-specific issues in blood stem cell mobilization in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and in patients with light chain amyloidosis. We also discuss options in hard-to-mobilize patients.