Bronchial hyperresponsiveness in young children with allergic rhinitis and its risk factors

BACKGROUND: Subjects with allergic rhinitis but no clinical evidence of asthma have greater bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), and several factors have been implicated as its determinants. However, studies in young children are lacking. The aims of this study were to evaluate the prevalence of BHR in young children with allergic rhinitis and to investigate its risk factors. METHODS: Methacholine bronchial challenges were performed in 4- to 6-year-old nonasthmatic children with allergic rhinitis (n = 83) and in healthy nonatopic controls (n = 32), using a modified auscultation method. The end-point was defined as the appearance of wheezing and/or oxygen desaturation. Subjects were considered to have BHR when they had end-point concentrations of methacholine 相似文献   

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness in children with atopic rhinitis: a 7-year follow-up

BACKGROUND: A high prevalence of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) was found in atopic subjects with rhinitis. Those subjects may be at higher risk for developing bronchial asthma. We evaluated, in a 7-year follow-up, BHR and atopy in a homogeneous population of nonasthmatic children with allergic rhinitis (AR), and their role in asthma development. METHODS: Twenty-eight children (6-15 years) with AR were studied. At enrollment (T(0)), skin tests, total serum IgE assay, peak expiratory flow (PEF) monitoring and methacholine (Mch) bronchial challenge were performed. BHR was computed as the Mch dose causing a 20% forced expiratory volume (FEV)(1) fall (PD(20)FEV(1)) and as dose-response slope (D(RS)). Subjects were reassessed after 7 years (T(1)) using the same criteria. RESULTS: At T(0), 13 children (46%), showing a PD(20)FEV(1) <1526 microg of Mch, had BHR (Mch+), although PEF variability (PEFv) was within normal limits. None of the children with negative methacholine test developed bronchial asthma after 7 years. Of the 13 Mch+, only two reported asthma symptoms after 7 years. No significant change was seen in the other parameters of atopy considered. CONCLUSION: Children with allergic rhinitis present a high prevalence of BHR. Nevertheless, their PEFv is normal and the rate of asthma development low.     

Effect of immunotherapy on asthma progression, BHR and sputum eosinophils in allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and airway inflammation are frequently associated with allergic rhinitis, and may be important risk factors for the development of asthma. Specific immunotherapy (SIT) reduces symptom in subjects with allergic rhinitis, but the mechanisms are not clear. AIMS OF THE STUDY: To assess the effect of Parietaria-SIT on asthma progression, rhinitic symptoms, BHR, and eosinophilic inflammation. METHODS: Nonasthmatic subjects with seasonal rhinitis were randomly assigned to receive Parietaria pollen vaccine (n = 15) or matched placebo (n = 15). Data on symptoms and medication score, BHR to methacholine, eosinophilia in sputum were collected throughout the 3-year study. RESULTS: By the end of the study, in the placebo group, symptoms and medication scores significantly increased by a median (interquartile range) of 121% (15-280) and 263% (0-4400) respectively (P < 0.01), whereas no significant difference was observed in the SIT group. We found no significant changes in sputum eosinophils and BHR to methacholine in both groups throughout the study. Nine of 29 participants developed asthma symptoms during the study; of these, only two subjects (14%) in the SIT-treated group (P = 0.056). CONCLUSIONS: Parietaria-SIT reduces symptom and rescue medication scores, but no changes in BHR to methacholine or sputum eosinophilia were observed. Moreover, Parietaria-SIT appears to prevent the natural progression of allergic rhinitis to asthma, suggesting that SIT should be considered earlier in the management of subjects with allergic rhinitis.     

Relationship between nasal and bronchial responsiveness in perennial allergic rhinitic patients with asthma

BACKGROUND: The nasal and bronchial mucosa present similarities and most patients with asthma also have rhinitis, suggesting the concept of 'one airway one disease'. Although many studies may suggest the relationship between nasal and bronchial responsiveness in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma, few studies have been published which address this question directly. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the relationship between nonspecific nasal and bronchial responsiveness exists in perennial allergic rhinitic patients with asthma. METHODS: Fifty-one perennial allergic rhinitic patients with the definitive or suspected asthma underwent methacholine bronchial provocation tests and nasal histamine challenge tests. A slope of the absolute changes in nasal symptoms score/log concentrations of histamine was calculated by linear regression analysis. A ratio of the final absolute change in nasal symptoms score to the sum of all the doses of histamine given to the subject was also calculated. The degree of bronchial responsiveness to methacholine was categorized as positive bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) if PC(20) (provocative concentration of methacholine resulting in 20% fall in FEV(1)) was <4 mg/ml, borderline BHR if PC(20) was >or=4 but 16 mg/ml. Another index of bronchial responsiveness (BRindex) was calculated as the log [(% decline in FEV(1)/log final methacholine concentration as mg/dl) + 10]. RESULTS: The geometric means of the slope (4.47 vs. 2.95, p < 0.05) and the ratio (1.68 vs. 0.54, p < 0.01) were higher in patients with positive BHR (n = 23) than in patients with negative BHR (n = 19), respectively. The geometric means of the slope (3.50) and the ratio (1.13) in patients with borderline BHR (n = 9) were between the two groups, respectively. In all patients, the log-slope (r = 0.48, p < 0.001) and the log-ratio (r = 0.51, p < 0.001) were correlated well with the BRindex, respectively. Even in allergic rhinitic patients with definitive asthma, the log-slope was correlated with the BRindex (r = 0.39, p < 0.05) or log-PC(20) (r = -0.36, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The nonspecific nasal responsiveness may be related to the nonspecific bronchial responsiveness in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma, which may support the viewpoint that allergic rhinitis and asthma represent a continuum of inflammation involving one common airway.     

Bronchial responsiveness and airway inflammation in patients with nonallergic rhinitis with eosinophilia syndrome

Background: Nonallergic rhinitis with eosinophilia syndrome (NARES) is characterized by persistent nasal symptoms without allergy and by a marked eosinophil recruitment in the nasal cavities. Objective: We studied whether patients with NARES had bronchial responsiveness to methacholine and airway inflammation and examined the relationship between these factors. Methods: We selected a group of 39 patients referred to our allergy clinic for symptoms of perennial rhinitis. Atopic status was excluded by skin prick tests and RASTs. None of the patients had a history of respiratory symptoms. We preliminarily performed nasal lavage in all patients, and the diagnosis of NARES was made on the basis of the presence of at least 10% eosinophils in nasal lavage fluid. A methacholine challenge and sputum induction were also done on two different days. Results: Eosinophils in nasal lavage fluid ranged between 10% and 86%. Serum IgE levels were within normal range. Total circulating eosinophils ranged between 40 and 890/mm³. Methacholine PD₂₀ values were measurable in only 18 patients (range, 0.32 to 22.56 μmol; group 1). In the remaining 21 patients, methacholine PD₂₀ values were greater than 24 μmol (group 2). We found that differential cell counts in nasal lavage fluid in group 1 were not different from those in group 2. Methacholine PD₂₀ values were not significantly related to any cell count in the nasal lavage fluid. Induced sputum was accomplished only in 22 patients. Eosinophils in induced sputum ranged between 0% and 56.5%. Numbers of total cells, macrophages, lymphocytes, neutrophils, and epithelial cells in the two subgroups were not different. The number of metachromatic cells tended to be higher in group 1 compared with group 2 (0.31% vs 0.05%), but the difference was not significant. The eosinophil count in the induced sputum was significantly higher in group 1 compared with group 2 (16.8% vs 3.1%; p < 0.05). In the entire population, methacholine PD₂₀ values were significantly correlated with the number of eosinophils in sputum (r = –0.63; p < 0.001). Conclusion: We showed that 46% of patients with NARES but without histories of respiratory symptoms had a measurable bronchial responsiveness. The presence of bronchial responsiveness was associated with an increased number of eosinophils in induced sputum but not with the inflammatory process in the nose. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997;100:775-80.)     

Impact of allergic rhinitis on asthma: effects on bronchial hyperreactivity

Background:  Remarkable relationship exists between upper and lower airways. Bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) is a paramount feature of asthma and may be considered a strong risk factor for the onset of asthma in patients with allergic rhinitis.
Objective:  This study is aimed at evaluating the presence of BHR in a large group of patients with moderate-severe persistent allergic rhinitis alone, and at investigating possible risk factors related to severe BHR.
Methods:  Three hundred and forty-two patients with moderate-severe persistent allergic rhinitis were prospectively and consecutively evaluated. Clinical examination, skin prick test, spirometry and bronchial methacholine (MCH) test were performed in all patients.
Results:  Twenty-two (6.4%) patients had severe BHR, 74 (21.6%) patients had mild BHR and 192 (56.2%) had borderline BHR; 54 (15.8%) patients had a negative MCH test. The logistic regression analysis evidenced that trees and house dust mites sensitization (OR_Adj: 8.1), rhinitis duration > 5 years (OR_Adj: 5.4) and FEV₁ ≤ 86% of predicted (OR_Adj: 4.0) were significantly associated with severe BHR. The discriminative ability of this model is appreciably satisfactory, being the AUC = 0.90.
Conclusion:  This study highlights the close link between upper and lower airways and the role of some risk factors, such as tree and mite sensitization, > 5-year duration, and ≤ 86% FEV₁ values, as risk factors for severe BHR in patients with moderate-severe persistent allergic rhinitis alone. Therefore, BHR is frequently present in patients with chronic rhinitis and should be suspected in the presence of defined risk factors.     

Association between body mass index and allergy in teenage girls in Taiwan

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of atopy and asthma is affected by age, sex and lifestyle factors. Obesity was reported to be a risk factor for asthmatic symptoms in children and adults. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relation between body mass index (BMI) and the prevalence of atopy, rhinitis, wheezing and bronchial responsiveness in adolescents. METHODS: BMI (kg/m2), skin-prick test, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) to methacholine, and self-reported rhinitis and airway symptoms were assessed in a cross-sectional survey in 1459 eighth-grade students (age 13.2 to 15.5, mean 13.6 years) of seven junior high schools in northern Taiwan. RESULTS: The prevalence of atopy was 42% in boys and 27% in girls. The study population was grouped into quintiles of BMI by sex. Girls in the highest BMI quintile had higher prevalence of atopy and rhinitis symptoms. Compared with the middle three quintiles, they had increased risk of atopy in multivariate analyses adjusted for area of living, sibling number, parent education level and family history of asthma (odds ratio = 1.77, 95% confidence interval = 1.15-2.73). Girls with the lowest BMI quintile had lower prevalence of BHR and wheezing. Compared with the middle three quintiles, they had reduced risk of BHR in multivariate analyses adjusted for area of living, atopy, family history of asthma, and baseline pulmonary function (odds ratio = 0.40, 95% confidence interval = 0.20-0.81). No association between BMI and atopy or BHR was seen in boys. CONCLUSION: BMI was a significant predictor of atopy, allergic symptoms and BHR in teenage girls.     

Airway inflammation in asthma and perennial allergic rhinitis. Relationship with nonspecific bronchial responsiveness and maximal airway narrowing

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic airway inflammation is the hallmark of asthma, but it has also been reported in other conditions such as allergic rhinitis. We have tested whether the analysis of cells and chemicals in sputum can distinguish between patients with mild allergic asthma, those with allergic rhinitis, and healthy controls. The relationship between inflammation markers in sputum and nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine (BHR) (PD20 and maximal response plateau [MRP] values) was also evaluated. METHODS: We selected 31 mild asthmatics and 15 rhinitis patients sensitized to house-dust mite. As a control group, we studied 10 healthy subjects. Every subject underwent the methacholine bronchial provocation test (M-BPT) and sputum induction. Blood eosinophils and serum ECP levels were measured. Sputum cell differentials were assessed, and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), tryptase, albumin, and interleukin (IL)-5 levels were measured in the entire sputum supernatant. RESULTS: Blood eosinophils and serum ECP levels were higher in asthma patients and rhinitis than in healthy controls, but no difference between asthma patients and rhinitis patients was found. Asthmatics had higher eosinophil counts and higher ECP and tryptase levels in sputum than rhinitis patients or control subjects. Sputum albumin levels were higher in asthmatics than in controls. Rhinitis patients exhibited higher sputum eosinophils than healthy controls. An association between sputum eosinophil numbers and MPR values (r= -0.57) was detected, and a trend toward correlation between sputum ECP levels and PD20 values (r= -0.47) was found in the rhinitis group, but not in asthmatics. No correlation between blood eosinophilic inflammation and lung functional indices was found. CONCLUSIONS: Induced sputum is an accurate method to study bronchial inflammation, allowing one to distinguish between rhinitis patients and mildly asthmatic patients. The fact that no relationship was detected between sputum inflammation and BHR suggests that other factors, such as airway remodeling, may be at least partly responsible for BHR in asthma.     

House dust mite avoidance for children with asthma in homes of low-income families

BACKGROUND: Home exposure to high levels of house dust mite allergen has been shown to aggravate airways reactivity and asthma. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether specific house dust mite control measures could reduce exposure levels and asthma severity. METHODS: This double-blinded, randomized trial compared asthma progression over 1 year in children whose homes received standard environmental control intervention with those whose homes received aggressive intervention for dust mite elimination. The primary end point was doubling in PD20 methacholine. RESULTS: Symptom scores and quality-of-life scores were similar for the standard and aggressive intervention groups. PD20 methacholine doubling occurred in 9 members of the aggressive intervention group vs 4 control patients (P <.05). Dust mite levels decreased in the aggressive intervention homes compared with the standard intervention homes (P <.05). CONCLUSION: Aggressive dust mite intervention decreased dust mite levels and improved bronchial hyperresponsiveness.     

Effect of AA-2414, a thromboxane A2 receptor antagonist, on airway inflammation in subjects with asthma

Background: Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways. The chemokines are potent chemoattractants for eosinophils and other types of cells associated with allergic inflammation. AA-2414, a new thromboxane A₂ receptor antagonist, reduces bronchial hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic subjects, but its mechanism of action is unclear. Objective: We tested the hypothesis that the beneficial effects of AA-2414 in asthma result from reduction in the number of inflammatory cells infiltrating the airway associated with inhibition of chemokine release. Methods: We studied bronchial biopsy specimens from 31 asthmatic subjects before and after oral treatment with AA-2414 (80 mg/day) or matched placebo for 4 months in a double-blind manner. Biopsy specimens were examined by immunohistochemistry. Each subject recorded symptom score and peak expiratory flow (PEF). Lung function and bronchial responsiveness to methacholine were measured before and after treatment. Results: After treatment, significant improvements in symptom score (P < .05), PEF (P < .01), diurnal variation of PEF (P < .01), and bronchial responsiveness (P < .01) were observed in the AA-2414 group compared with the placebo group. These improvements were accompanied by a significant decrease in the number of submucosal EG2⁺ eosinophils (P < .05). There was also a reduction in the number of cells expressing RANTES (P < .05) and macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α (P < .05) in the epithelium and of cells expressing monocyte chemotactic protein-3 (P < .01), RANTES (P < .05), MIP-1α (P < .01), and eotaxin (P < .01) in the submucosa in the AA-2414 treatment group. A significant correlation was found between the number of EG2⁺ eosinophils and numbers of monocyte chemotactic protein-3⁺ (r_s = 0.52, P < .005), MIP-1α⁺ (r_s = 0.34, P < .05), and eotaxin⁺ cells (r_s = 0.47, P < .01) in the submucosa. There was a significant negative correlation between the increase in bronchial responsiveness and the change in number of submucosal EG2⁺ cells (r_s = –0.65, P < .001). Conclusions: These findings suggest that AA-2414 treatment of patients with asthma may inhibit activated eosinophil infiltration in part by modulating the expression of chemokines in bronchial tissues. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999;103:1054-61.)     

Bronchial hyperreactivity and spirometric impairment in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: Allergic disorders are characterized by a systemic involvement of the immune response. There is a clear link between allergic rhinitis and asthma. Bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) may be present in rhinitics. Smaller airways may also be impaired in mild asthma. This study aimed at evaluating a group of subjects suffering from perennial allergic rhinitis alone to investigate the presence of BHR and spirometric impairment. METHODS: One hundred rhinitics sensitized only to perennial allergens were evaluated. Spirometry and methacholine bronchial challenge were performed. RESULTS: Five rhinitics showed reduced values of forced expiratory volume/1 s (FEV(1)) without symptoms of asthma. Forty-eight rhinitics had reduced forced expiratory flow at 25 and 75% of pulmonary volume (FEF(25-75)) values. Seventy-two patients showed a positive methacholine challenge. In this group, reduced values of FVC (p < 0.05), FEV(1) (p < 0.05), and FEF(25-75) (p < 0.01) were demonstrated in comparison with BHR-negative rhinitics. There was a relationship between the degree of BHR and FEV(1) values (p < 0.05) and FEF(25-75) values (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study evidences that an impairment of spirometric parameters may be observed in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis alone. A high percentage of these patients have BHR. Thus, new management strategies should be employed in rhinitics.     

Comparison of the efficacy of budesonide and fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray for once daily treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis

Background: Intranasal corticosteroids, such as budesonide and fluticasone propionate, are widely prescribed in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis. Once daily budesonide dry powder and fluticasone propionate aqueous suspension have been found to provide similar efficacy in controlling symptoms of perennial allergic rhinitis. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of treatment with once daily budesonide aqueous nasal spray. Methods: This study involved a multicenter, blinded, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial of adults with perrenial allergic rhinitis. Patients (n = 273) recorded daily nasal symptoms for 8 to 14 days (baseline) and 6 weeks (treatment). Results: Budesonide decreased combined symptoms to a significantly greater extent than did fluticasone (P = .03); both treatments significantly decreased mean combined nasal symptoms scores compared with placebo. Of the 3 nasal symptoms assessed (ie, nasal blockage, runny nose, and sneezing), nasal blockage was significantly (P = .009) more decreased with budesonide compared with fluticasone. Both treatments also significantly improved runny nose and sneezing compared with placebo. Improvement in combined nasal symptom scores of the budesonide-treated group reached statistical significance within 36 hours compared with placebo (P = .01); in those patients treated with fluticasone, significant improvement compared with placebo was first observed within 60 hours. Adverse events were mild and transient. Conclusions: Once daily budesonide aqueous nasal spray, 256 μg, was significantly better in controlling the symptoms of perrenial allergic rhinitis than once daily fluticasone propionate, 200 μg, especially nasal blockage. Both treatments were superior to placebo. Budesonide may have a faster onset of action than fluticasone. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 1998;102:902-8.)     

Role of FEF25%-75% as a predictor of bronchial hyperreactivity in allergic patients.

BACKGROUND: The small airways may play an important role in the clinical manifestations of asthma. Forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% (FEF25%-75%) has been proposed as an approximate measure of the caliber of distal airways. Bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) is a feature of asthma. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the possible role of FEF25%-75% as a predictor of BHR in allergic patients with asthma and rhinitis. METHODS: A total of 726 patients (mean +/- SD age, 24.7 +/- 6.3 years) were evaluated. Spirometry and methacholine bronchial challenge were evaluated in all the participants. RESULTS: A difference between forced expiratory volume in 1 second and FEF25%-75% greater than 20 or a ratio between these variables greater than 1.24 discriminates between patients with no response to a mild response to methacholine vs patients with a moderate-to-severe response with high sensitivity (P < .001). CONCLUSION: This study highlights the possible role of FEF25%-75% in predicting BHR in allergic individuals with airway disorders.     

Serum eosinophil cationic protein in relation to bronchial asthma in a young Swedish population

How are the serum concentration of eosinophil cationic protein (S-ECP) and the blood eosinophil count (B-Eos) related to symptoms of asthma, allergy, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR)? We measured S-ECP, B-Eos, and total and specific IgE in serum in blood samples from 699 randomly selected persons 20–44 years old. They also underwent a structured interview, spirometry, a methacholine provocation test, and skin prick tests as part of the European Community Respiratory Health Survey. B-Eos and S-ECP were found to be closely related to asthma symptom score (P < 0.001), total IgE (P < 0.001), and BHR (P < 0.001). On the basis of the results, the subjects were divided into four groups: healthy controls, patients with allergic rhinitis, patients with nonallergic asthma, and patients with allergic asthma. There were significant differences in both B-Eos and S-ECP among the groups (P < 0.001), the highest values being found in the allergic asthma group. B-Eos and S-ECP each had an additive value in predicting the occurrence of asthma. Among persons with high concentrations of both variables, asthma was eight times more common than in those with low concentrations. Allergy and BHR were also found to be independently related to B-Eos and S-ECP levels. Furthermore, both B-Eos and S-ECP showed good correlation to subjective and objective measures of asthma activity. We conclude that both B-Eos and S-ECP and their interrelationship may be of value in assessing the activity of asthma. However, their role in disease management was not established in this cross-sectional study.     

The determinants of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with allergic rhinitis and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) may be at higher risk of developing asthma. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether reactivity to aeroallergens in skin prick testing (SPT) and serum eosinophil cationic protein levels can be used to predict BHR in allergic rhinitis patients. METHODS: Fifty-nine consecutive patients with allergic rhinitis underwent SPTs using grass, tree, weed, parietaria, Alternaria, Aspergillus, mites, and cat and dog dander extracts. Methacholine challenge tests were performed using spirometry. RESULTS: Methacholine-induced BHR was detected in 23 patients (39%). Of 59 patients, 14 had 1 positive SPT response, 35 had 2 to 4 positive responses, and 10 had more than 4 positive responses. There was a significant inverse correlation between methacholine provocation concentration that caused a decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 20% (PC20) and the number of positive SPT responses (r = -0.28; P = .03). The BHR-positive patients had a mean of 4 positive SPT responses, whereas BHR-negative patients had a mean of 2.6 (P = .04). Nine BHR-positive patients (39%) and only 1 BHR-negative patient (3%) had more than 4 positive SPT responses (P < .001). There was no correlation between serum eosinophil cationic protein levels and methacholine PC20 doses. There was a strong association between hyperresponsiveness to methacholine and both cat and dog dander sensitivity (P < .001 and P = .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Allergic rhinitis patients with SPT responses to a higher number of allergens are more likely to have BHR. Whether the number of positive SPT responses correlates with the risk of developing asthma in allergic rhinitis patients remains to be determined.     

Induction of Bronchial Tolerance After 1 Cycle of Monophosphoryl-A-Adjuvanted Specific Immunotherapy in Children With Grass Pollen Allergies

PurposeSubcutaneous allergen-specific immunotherapy (SCIT) is a well-established and clinically effective method to treat allergic diseases, such as rhinitis and asthma. It remains unclear how soon after initiation of an ultra-short course of grass pollen immunotherapy adjuvanted with monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL)-specific bronchial tolerance can be induced.MethodsIn a prospective study of 69 children double-sensitized to birch and grass pollens (51 males, average age 11.1 years), development of bronchial tolerance after 1 cycle of SCIT for grass was evaluated. In all the patients, the bronchial allergen provocation test (BAP) was performed before and after treatment. According to the results of the first BAP, the patients were divided into 2 groups: those showing a negative BAP with a decrease in FEV1 of <20% (seasonal allergic rhinitis [SAR] group, n=47); and those showing a positive BAP with a decrease in FEV1 of ≥20% (SAR with allergic asthma [SAR and Asthma] group, n=22). All the patients received MPL-adjuvanted, ultra-short course immunotherapy for birch, but only those with a positive BAP to grass received MPL-SCIT for grass.ResultsAfter the pollen season, the BAP in the SAR group remained unchanged, while it was improved in the SAR and Asthma group (decrease in FEV1 of 28.8% vs 12.5%, P<0.01). The IgG4 levels increased after SCIT (median before SCIT 0.34 to 11.4 after SCIT), whereas the total and specific IgE levels remained unchanged.ConclusionsAfter 1 cycle of MPL-SCIT, specific bronchial tolerance may be significantly induced, whereas in patients without SCIT, bronchial hyperactivity may remain unchanged.     

Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Impulse Oscillometry in Children With Allergic Rhinitis

Purpose

Airway inflammation, bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR), and bronchodilator response (BDR) are representative characteristics of asthma. Because allergic rhinitis (AR) is a risk factor for asthma development, we evaluated these 3 characteristics in AR using measurement of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), a methacholine challenge test (MCT), and impulse oscillometry (IOS).

Methods

This study included 112 children with asthma (asthma group), 196 children with AR (AR group), and 32 control subjects (control group). We compared pulmonary function parameters and FeNO levels among the 3 groups. The AR group was subdivided into 2 categories: the AR group with BHR and the AR group without, and again pulmonary function and FeNO levels were compared between the 2 subgroups.

Results

FeNO levels were more increased in the AR and asthma groups than in the control group; within the AR group, FeNO was higher in the AR group with BHR than in the AR group without. The BDR was more increased in the AR group than in the control group when percent changes in reactance at 5 Hz (Δ X5) and reactance area (Δ AX) were compared. In the AR group, however, there was no difference in Δ X5 and Δ AX between the AR group with BHR and the AR group without.

Conclusions

Reversible airway obstruction on IOS and elevated FeNO levels were observed in children with AR. Because elevated FeNO levels can indicate airway inflammation and because chronic inflammation may lead to BHR, FeNO levels may be associated with BHR in AR. IOS can be a useful tool for detecting lower airway involvement of AR independent of BHR assessed in the MCT.     

Dissimilarity between seasonal changes in airway responsiveness to adenosine-5'-monophosphate and methacholine in patients with grass pollen allergic rhinitis: relation to induced sputum

BACKGROUND: In patients with allergic rhinitis, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and airway inflammation may increase during pollen exposure. BHR can be assessed by adenosine-5'-monophosphate (AMP) or methacholine challenge. It has been suggested that BHR to AMP is more closely related to airway inflammation than BHR to methacholine. Seasonal allergic rhinitis offers a dynamic model to study changes in BHR and airway inflammation during natural allergen exposure. METHODS: We measured BHR [provocative concentration causing a 20% fall (PC(20)) in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1))] to AMP and methacholine, and induced sputum cells in 16 rhinitis patients before and during the 2001 grass pollen season. RESULTS: There was a decrease in PC(20) methacholine during pollen exposure (geometric mean PC(20) from 3.22 to 1.73 mg/ml, p = 0.0023), whereas no reduction was observed for PC(20) AMP (p = 0.11). There was no increase in sputum eosinophils [pre: 0.69% (95% confidence interval 0.22-2.07); during: 1.85 (0.55- 5.6), p = 0.31]. Although the correlation of log PC(20) methacholine and log PC(20) AMP at baseline was good (r = 0.76, p = 0.001), individual seasonal changes (doubling concentrations) in PC(20) methacholine were not correlated with changes in PC(20) AMP (rho = 0.21, p = 0.44). There was no correlation between baseline log PC(20) methacholine or seasonal changes in PC(20) methacholine and sputum eosinophils (p > 0.12, all correlations). In contrast, there was a significant correlation between seasonal changes in PC(20) AMP and changes in sputum eosinophils (rho = -0.59, p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: These data show dissimilarity between seasonal changes in PC(20) AMP and methacholine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Moreover, PC(20) AMP seems to be more closely related to sputum eosinophils than PC(20) methacholine. The clinical significance of this discrepancy is unclear.     

Asthma, bronchial hyperreactivity and mediator release in children with birch pollinosis. ECP and EPX levels are not related to bronchial hyperreactivity

Background Symptoms of allergic asthma are triggered by allergen exposure inducing allergic inflammation and hyperreactivity of the bronchi. Objectives To investigate the possible relationship between clinical symptoms and signs of asthma, i.e. bronchial variability as measured by peak expiatory flow rate (PEFR). bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) and mediators of allergic inflammation. Methods Twenty-eight children with pollinosis. but no obvious history of asthma, were studied at three occasions, i.e. before, during and after (autumn) the birch pollen season. Twelve children sensitive to birch pollen were considered as the case group. Sixteen children, who were only clinically sensitive to grass pollen, served as controls. Subjective symptoms of asthma were recorded by visual analogue scale, BHR was estimated by methacholine bronchial provocation tests, bronchial variability PEFR and circulating mediators of inflammation, i.e. eosinophil cationic protein, eosinophil protein X, myeloperoxidase and tryptase in serum. Results Bronchial hyperreactivity and by PEFR was more pronounced after than during the season (P < 0.01), whereas eosinophil mediators and the peak expiratory flow rate increased during the season (P < 0.05). Except for between PEFR variability and BHR in the autumn (r= 0.45; P= 0.014). no correlations were found. However, in the autumn, the majority of children were still hyperreactive in the bronchi and showed PEFR variability but the levels of eosinophil mediators in serum had returned to normal levels. Conclusion Signs and symptoms of asthma did not correlate with serum levels of mediators of allergic inflammation. Bronchial hyperreactivity and PEFR variability persisted after the pollen season when signs of bronchial inflammation had disappeared. We hypothesize that eosinophil mediators and other markers of allergic inflammation disappear after the late-phase reaction, whereas BHR persists. This would explain the lack of correlation between the levels of eosinophil mediators in serum and symptoms of asthma and BHR.     

The type of sensitizing allergen can affect the evolution of respiratory allergy

BACKGROUND: Numerous factors affect the evolution of respiratory allergy, in children, but little is known in adults. We assessed in a prospective study the influence of the type of allergen on the progression of disease. METHODS: Outpatients, with respiratory allergy underwent skin tests and pulmonary function/methacholine challenge at baseline and after 3 years. Patients were subdivided in pure rhinitis or rhinitis + bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR). In polysensitized subjects a single relevant allergen (mites, grasses, birch, Parietaria) was identified based on symptom distribution and when needed on nasal challenge. RESULTS: 6750 patients (age range 12-46) were studied. Of them, 17.8% were monosensitized but this percentage decreased to 10.4% after 3 years (P < 0.05). Subjects with pure rhinitis were 81% at the beginning and 48% at the end. After 3 years, the patients with bronchial responsiveness increased from 18% to 58% for mites, 22% to 49% for birch, 18% to 44% for grasses, 17% to 32% for Parietaria, with a significant difference among allergens (P < 0.05). Almost the same was seen in monosensitized subjects, being mites most likely to cause a worsening. All patients with BHR at baseline received immunotherapy. In these patients the onset of new sensitizations was significantly lower than in the group (pure rhinitis) receiving drugs only and lower airways symptoms disappeared more frequently. CONCLUSION: The different type of allergen influences the course of the disease, as well as the use of immunotherapy.