Weekly Bortezomib,Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin,and Dexamethasone Is a Safe and Effective Therapy for Elderly Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

BackgroundThe synergic, additive effect of bortezomib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) has never been tested in an elderly group of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM).Patients and Methods:In this study, 25 patients with a median age of 75 years were treated with bortezomib at usual doses of 1.3 mg/m² every 21 days. After 2 cycles, bortezomib was given intravenously (I.V.) weekly every 32 days. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m² I.V. was given on day 4 for 2 cycles and then was given on day 8. Dexamethasone 40 mg I.V. was given on days 1-4 for 2 cycles and then 20 mg weekly.Results:Bortezomib/PLD/dexamethasone therapy resulted in 20 of 25 objective responses for an overall response rate of 80% (complete remission + very good partial remission, 66%). Median overall survival was not reached. Median duration of response (progression-free survival) was 8 months. Eleven of 16 patients (68%) with ≥ VGPR still maintain a response at a median of 12 months versus 4 months for patients with < VGPR (PFS, overall survival; P = .0001). Grade 3/4 toxicities were mild in most of the patients.ConclusionBortezomib/PLD/dexamethasone combination is safe and effective in elderly patients with resistant-relapsing MM.     

原发性浆细胞白血病22例临床特征与治疗

目的:探讨原发性浆细胞白血病（PPCL）的临床特征与治疗,提高对该病的认识。方法:对本院1987年5 月至2009年4 月确诊的22例PPCL患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果:22例患者中,男性13例,女性9 例;年龄33～76岁,平均年龄（53.3 ± 13.3）岁。主要临床特征为贫血者19例,乏力17例,骨痛15例,发热9 例,出血9 例,体重下降7 例,肝肿大7 例,脾肿大11例,淋巴结肿大7 例,胸腔积液6 例,腹腔积液4 例,心包积液2 例,盆腔积液2 例,双下肢浮肿3 例。实验室检查以外周血白细胞升高（68.2%）、贫血（86.4%）、血小板减少（86.4%）、M 蛋白、肾功能不全、低蛋白血症、ESR 增快和血清尿酸升高常见。骨质破坏常见。多种常规化疗方案均难以达到或维持长期临床缓解。10例予常规化疗方案,其中1 例一过性CR、6 例PR、3 例进展;1 例常规化疗联合沙利度胺,获得CR长达7 个月;3 例应用硼替佐米联合化疗或沙利度胺均获PR;2 例因肺部感染、肝功能异常以及心功能不全,不能化疗,分别生存1、4 个月;1 例未开始治疗即死亡;5 例放弃治疗。结论:PPCL在临床特点上兼有急性白血病与多发性骨髓瘤的特征,且更加倾向于急性白血病,预后极差。新药硼替佐米在PPCL的靶向治疗中具有积极显著的作用,为患者提供了新的治疗希望。硼替佐米联合化疗及沙利度胺有望提高对PPCL的疗效。      

Varicella-Zoster Virus Prophylaxis with Low-Dose Acyclovir in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Treated with Bortezomib

BackgroundVaricella-zoster virus (VZV) reactivation is a common complication in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) treated with bortezomib, with an incidence rate of 10%-60%. The aim of our study was to analyze the effect of acyclovir prophylaxis in this patient population.Patients and MethodsWe studied 98 consecutive patients with relapsed MM treated with bortezomib. Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² was given on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day cycle. At first, patients did not receive any VZV prophylaxis, but because of the high incidence of VZV reactivation, VZV prophylaxis with acyclovir was implemented subsequently.ResultsA total of 11 patients treated with bortezomib did not have any VZV prophylaxis, and 4 of these 11 patients (36%) developed VZV reactivation in the form of herpes zoster. No VZV reactivations were observed in the 32 patients who received acyclovir 400 mg 3 times daily or the 55 patients who received acyclovir in a dose reduced to 400 mg once daily during bortezomib treatment.ConclusionVaricellazoster virus reactivation is a common and serious adverse effect of bortezomib treatment. Acyclovir 400 mg once daily is sufficient to protect from VZV reactivation in patients with MM treated with bortezomib.     

Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Patients With Multiple Myeloma Complicated by Renal Impairment

BackgroundRenal impairment is a common complication of multiple myeloma (MM) and is related to shorter overall survival and increased rates of early death. Bortezomib is a new agent for the treatment of patients with myeloma, with high response rates and controllable side effects. In this study, we will evaluate the efficacy and safety of bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed MM complicated by renal impairment.Patients and MethodsThis is a prospective study of the general characteristics, reversibility of renal impairment, response of myeloma, and side effects of 18 consecutive newly diagnosed patients with MM and renal impairment who received ≥ 2 cycles of bortezomib and dexamethasone.ResultsOf 18 patients newly diagnosed with MM, the median age was 60 years, and the median serum creatinine was 5.3 mg/dL. Patients received a median of 4 cycles of bortezomib and dexamethasone. Reversal of renal impairment was documented in 38.9% of the patients, and the median time to reversal was 16 days. Moreover, 33.3% of the patients achieved renal response (a 50% decrease in serum creatinine). The overall response rate of MM was 83.3%, including a 33.3% complete response (CR) rate, a 16.7% near-CR rate, a 16.7% very good partial response (PR) rate, and a 16.7% PR rate. Grade 3/4 adverse events consisted of infection (n = 3), peripheral neuropathy (n = 3), and ileus (n = 1). After a median follow-up of 15.7 months, the median progression-free survival for all patients was 12.6 months.ConclusionBortezomib plus dexamethasone is a safe and effective regimen for newly diagnosed patients with MM complicated by renal impairment.     

Bortezomib in first-line therapy is associated with falls in older adults with multiple myeloma

BackgroundBortezomib is a common multiple myeloma therapy that can cause treatment-related peripheral neuropathy, a risk factor for falls. The relationship between bortezomib and falls in older patients with multiple myeloma is unknown.MethodsWe analyzed the SEER-Medicare database for patients aged 65 or older diagnosed with multiple myeloma between 2007 and 2013. Claims were analyzed for myeloma treatments, falls, and covariates of interest. We evaluated accidental falls occurring within 12 months after starting first-line multiple myeloma treatment with bortezomib.ResultsBortezomib was used in first-line therapy for 2052 older adults with new diagnoses of multiple myeloma. Claims for falls were reported in 157 (8%) patients within 12 months after starting bortezomib, compared to 102 (5%) patients not receiving bortezomib (p < 0.001). Bortezomib was associated with a 36% increased risk of falls after controlling for covariates (aHR 1.36; 95% CI 1.05–1.75; p = 0.018). In a landmark analysis of those who survived 12 months after starting treatment, the median overall survival of those with a fall was 35.7 months compared to 49.1 months for those without (p < 0.0001). A fall in the first year after diagnosis was associated with a 26% increased risk in hazard for death (aHR 1.26; 95% CI 1.02–1.56; p = 0.033).ConclusionIn older adults with multiple myeloma, bortezomib was associated with an increased risk of having a diagnostic code for falls. Decreased overall survival was seen in those who fell within the year of starting therapy. Prospective trials involving fall assessments and fall-prevention interventions are needed in this population.     

Pilot study of bortezomib for patients with imatinib-refractory chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic or accelerated phase

BackgroundProteasome inhibitors are anticancer compounds that disrupt the proteolytic activity of the proteasome and lead to tumor cell growth arrest and apoptosis. Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that is currently approved for use in multiple myeloma (MM) and mantle-cell lymphoma. It induces apoptosis of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) cells in vitro, but the activity of bortezomib in patients with imatinib-resistant CML is unknown.MethodsWe conducted a pilot trial to evaluate the activity of single-agent bortezomib in CML. Seven patients with imatinib-refractory CML were treated with bortezomib at a dose of 1.5 mg/m² on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 every 3 weeks.ResultsThe median number of cycles received was 2. No patient had a hematologic or cytogenetic response. Three patients had a temporary decrease in basophil counts associated with therapy with bortezomib. Six patients experienced grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities.ConclusionBortezomib had minimal efficacy and considerable toxicity in patients with imatinib-refractory CML. Further studies should focus on alternative approaches to using proteasome inhibitors in the treatment of CML, such as in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) or as a strategy to eradicate leukemic stem cells.     

Clinical activity of bortezomib in relapsed/refractory MALT lymphomas: results of a phase II study of the International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group (IELSG)

BackgroundThe nuclear factor-kappa B activation in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma pathogenesis provided the rationale for the evaluation of bortezomib in this malignancy.Patients and methodsThirty-two patients with relapsed/refractory MALT lymphoma were enrolled. Thirty-one patients received bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² i.v., on days 1, 4, 8, and 11, for up to six 21-day cycles.ResultsMedian age was 63 years (range, 37–82 years). Median number of prior therapies was 2 (range, 1–4). Nine patients had Ann Arbor stage I, 7 patients had stage II, and 16 patients had stage IV. Primary lymphoma localization was the stomach in 14 patients; multiple extranodal sites were present in 10 patients. Among the 29 patients assessable for response, the overall response rate was 48% [95% confidence interval (CI) 29% to 67%], with 9 complete and 5 partial responses. Nine patients experienced stable disease and six had disease progression during therapy. The most relevant adverse events were fatigue, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and peripheral neuropathy. After a median follow-up of 24 months, the median duration of response was not reached yet. Five deaths were reported, in two patients due to disease progression.ConclusionBortezomib is active in relapsed MALT lymphomas. Further investigations to identify optimal bortezomib dose, schedule, and combination regimens are needed since the frequent detection of dose-limiting peripheral neuropathy.     

Efficacy and safety of pegylated liposomal Doxorubicin in combination with bortezomib for multiple myeloma: effects of adverse prognostic factors on outcome

Introduction:Bortezomib with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is superior to bortezomib alone in the relapsed and/or refractory setting, based on the results of a randomized, parallel-group, open-label, multicenter phase III study. To identify patients who might most benefit from this new standard of care, we performed retrospective analyses evaluating the effects of clinically defined, high-risk features on the outcomes with this regimen.Patients and Methods:Patients received either bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of an every-21-day cycle with PLD 30 mg/m² on day 4 (n = 324) or bortezomib alone (n = 322). Four high- and low-risk subgroup categories were identified, including age ≥ 65, ≥ 2 previous therapies, International Staging System stage II/III, and disease refractory to last previous therapy.Results:Compared with bortezomib alone, PLD plus bortezomib significantly prolonged the time to progression and duration of response in all of these subgroups. PLD plus bortezomib was well tolerated in all subgroups, and had a safety profile that was not affected by response to previous therapy.Conclusion:Treatment of relapsed/refractory myeloma with the combination of PLD plus bortezomib provides better outcomes over bortezomib alone, even in the presence of high-risk prognostic factors. These results suggest that PLD plus bortezomib may represent an additional standard of care for this population of patients with multiple myeloma.     

A phase 2 trial of bortezomib followed by the addition of doxorubicin at progression in patients with recurrent or metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck: a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E1303)

BACKGROUND:

Bortezomib, an inhibitor of the 26S proteasome and NF‐κB, may have antitumor activity in adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC). Preclinical studies have shown synergy between bortezomib and doxorubicin.

METHODS:

Eligibility criteria included incurable ACC, any number of prior therapies but without an anthracycline, unidimensionally measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0‐2, and ejection fraction within normal limits. Patients with stable disease for ≥9 months were excluded. Patients received bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² by intravenous (IV) push on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11, every 21 days until progression. Doxorubicin 20 mg/m² IV on Days 1 and 8 was added at the time of progression.

RESULTS:

Twenty‐five patients were enrolled, of whom 24 were eligible; the most common distant metastatic sites were the lung (n = 22) and the liver (n = 7). There was no objective response with single‐agent bortezomib; best response was stable disease in 15 (71%) of 21 evaluable patients. The median progression‐free survival and overall survival were 6.4 months and 21 months, respectively. Of 10 evaluable patients who received bortezomib plus doxorubicin, 1 had a partial response, and 6 had stable disease. The most frequent toxicity with bortezomib was grade 3 sensory neuropathy (16%). With bortezomib plus doxorubicin, serious toxicities seen more than once were grade 3‐4 neutropenia (n = 3) and grade 3 anorexia (n = 2).

CONCLUSIONS:

Bortezomib was well tolerated and resulted in disease stabilization in a high percentage of patients but no objective responses. The combination of bortezomib and doxorubicin was also well tolerated and may warrant further investigation in ACC. Cancer 2011. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Bortezomib,doxorubicin and dexamethasone in advanced multiple myeloma

BackgroundBortezomib has shown significant activity in myeloma. In this multicenter trial, we assessed for the first time the combination of bortezomib, doxorubicin and low-dose dexamethasone (PAd) in the treatment of relapsed/refractory myeloma.Patients and methodsSixty-four patients were treated for a median of four 28-day cycles (1–6). Bortezomib was given at 1.3 mg/m² (days 1, 4, 8, 11) and dexamethasone at 40 mg (days 1–4); 34 patients receive doxorubicin at 20 mg/m² (days 1, 4) while 30 patients pegylated liposomal doxorubicin at 30 mg/m² (day 1).ResultsFifty-eight percent of patients had undergone prior autologous transplantation, 70% prior anthracycline and 27% prior bortezomib-based regimens. Forty-three patients (67%) achieved at least a partial response including 16 (25%) with at least a very good partial response. One-year event-free survival was 34% after PAd and 31% after the previous line of therapy (hazard ratio 1.20, 95% confidence interval 0.76–1.90, P = 0.43). One-year overall survival from the start of PAd was 66%. Grade 3–4 toxic effects included thrombocytopenia (48%), neutropenia (36%), infections (15%), anemia (13%), gastrointestinal disturbances (11%) and peripheral neuropathy (10%). Two patients had grade 3–4 cardiac heart failure.ConclusionsPAd is an active salvage therapy with manageable toxicity in patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma.     

Decrease in CD4+ T-Cell Counts in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Treated With Bortezomib

BackgroundBortezomib is highly effective in multiple myeloma and is widely used in this disease. Recently, an increased incidence of varicella zoster virus (VZV) reactivation was reported in patients with myeloma undergoing bortezomib treatment.Patients and MethodsWe investigated the influence of bortezomib on T-cell subpopulations in 53 patients with myeloma before initiation of bortezomib and during therapy.ResultsA decrease of CD4+ T cells was seen in 41 of 53 patients (77%). The median CD3+/CD4+ lymphocyte counts declined from 494/μL (range, 130-2187/μL) to 274/μL (range, 41-1404/μL) during bortezomib treatment (P < .001). In the majority of patients (40 of 53 patients, 75%), CD4+ lymphocytes dropped to < 400/μL during bortezomib treatment, and in 18 of 53 patients (33.9%) the CD4+ T cells fell below 200/μL. The minimum CD4+ cell count was observed at a median of 6 weeks (range, 2-22 weeks) after initiation of treatment. The incidence of herpes zoster reactivation was 5.7% in the whole population of patients with myeloma receiving bortezomib. Nineteen of 53 patients received acyclovir at a dose of 400 mg daily as prophylaxis against VZV reactivation. In this group, none of the patients developed herpes zoster. The incidence of VZV reactivation in patients not receiving acyclovir was 3 of 34 (8.8%). Importantly, occurrence of herpes zoster was associated with reduced CD4+ T-cell subpopulation: all patients who developed herpes zoster had CD4+ lymphocytes < 400/μL.ConclusionOur results show that bortezomib leads to a transient decrease in CD4+ lymphocytes, accompanied by an increased incidence of VZV infections. The antiviral prophylaxis with acyclovir is effective in patients with myeloma treated with bortezomib.     

Phase I study of proteasome inhibitor bortezomib plus CHOP in patients with advanced,aggressive T-cell or NK/T-cell lymphoma

The aim of the study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety of the combination of bortezomib and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (CHOP) as first-line therapy in advanced, aggressive T-cell lymphoma. Patients received increasing doses of bortezomib on days 1 and 8 (weekly schedule, 1.0, 1.3, and 1.6 mg/m²/dose) in addition to 750 mg/m² cyclophosphamide, 50 mg/m² doxorubicin, 1.4 mg/m² vincristine on day 1 and 100 mg/day prednisolone on days 1 to 5, every 3 weeks. Six cycles of therapy administered every 21 days were planned. Thirteen patients, who had stage III/IV chemonaive aggressive T-cell lymphoma, received a total of 55 cycles of treatment. One patient experienced hematologic dose-limiting toxicity (grade 4 neutropenia associated with febrile episode) at the 1.0 mg/m²/dose of bortezomib. There was no dose-limiting non-hematologic toxicity. The MTD was not reached at 1.6 mg/m² dose level of bortezomib. The overall complete remission rate in all patients was 61.5% (95% confidence interval = 31.6–86.1). Bortezomib can be safely combined with CHOP chemotherapy and constitutes an active regimen in advanced-stage, aggressive T-cell lymphoma patients. The recommended dose for subsequent phase II studies of bortezomib plus CHOP is 1.6 mg/m²/dose of bortezomib on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks as first-line treatment.     

Efficacy and safety of bortezomib in patients with plasma cell leukemia

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with plasma cell leukemia (PCL), an aggressive variant of multiple myeloma (MM), is usually poor. Bortezomib is the first proteasome inhibitor approved for the treatment of advanced MM. Currently available information regarding the role of bortezomib in PCL is scanty and derives from anecdotal, single-case reports. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective survey of unselected Italian patients with primary or secondary PCL who were treated with bortezomib outside of clinical trials. Twelve evaluable patients were recorded who had received bortezomib for 1 to 6 cycles as either a single agent or variously combined with other drugs. Three patients were treated with bortezomib as frontline therapy, and 9 patients received bortezomib after 1 to 4 lines of chemotherapy, including autologous stem cell transplantation and thalidomide. RESULTS: According to the International uniform response criteria of the International Myeloma Working Group, 5 partial responses (defined as a reduction in M-protein of >50%), 4 very good partial responses (defined as a reduction of >90% in M-protein), and 2 complete responses (defined as negative immunofixation) were achieved, for a response rate of 92%. Responses did not appear to be influenced by previous treatments or by other clinical or biologic parameters, including chromosome 13 deletion or the combination of bortezomib with other drugs. The median progression-free and overall survivals after bortezomib were 8 months and 12 months, respectively. At the time of last follow-up, 8 patients were alive 6 to 21 months after treatment with bortezomib, 4 of whom were in very good partial or complete responses. Grade 3/4 hematologic or neurologic toxicities (graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE; version 3]) were reported to occur in 9 patients and 1 patient, respectively, whereas 6 patients experienced possible or documented infections. CONCLUSIONS: Bortezomib appears to be an effective drug for PCL that could significantly improve the usually adverse clinical outcome of these patients.     

Bortezomib,Vorinostat, and Dexamethasone Combination Therapy in Relapsed Myeloma: Results of the Phase 2 MUK four Trial

IntroductionOutcomes continue to improve in relapsed myeloma as more effective treatment options emerge. We report a multicenter single-arm phase 2 trial evaluating toxicity and efficacy of the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor vorinostat in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone.Patients and MethodsSixteen patients who had received a median of 1 prior treatment line received bortezomib subcutaneously 1.3 mg/m² days 1, 4, 8, and 11; dexamethasone 20 mg orally days 1-2, 4-5, 8-9, and 11-12; vorinostat 400 mg orally days 1-4, 8-11, and 15-18 of a 21-day cycle. After receipt of a minimum of 3 cycles of therapy, participants received maintenance vorinostat (400 mg days 1-4 and 15-18 of a 28-day cycle).ResultsOverall response was 81.3%: complete response occurred in 4 of 16, very good partial response in 2 of 16, and partial response 7 of 16. Clinical benefit response rate was 100%; median progression-free survival was 11.9 months. A total of 75% patients experienced a dose reduction or stopped treatment as a result of intolerability.ConclusionAlthough toxicity and dose reductions were observed, this study demonstrates that the combination of vorinostat, bortezomib, and dexamethasone is effective in relapsed myeloma with good response rates, suggesting there is an ongoing rationale for further optimization of HDAC inhibitor–based combinations in the treatment of myeloma to improve tolerability and enhance efficacy.     

Bortezomib in Multiple Myeloma: A Practice Guideline

AimsBortezomib (Velcade™, PS-341), a first-in-class proteasome inhibitor, has been extensively studied either alone or in combination with other agents for the treatment of multiple myeloma. We created a provincial guideline for the use of bortezomib, in newly diagnosed individuals (both eligible and ineligible for transplant) and in individuals with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.Materials and methodsA systematic review was conducted searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and relevant meeting abstracts. Outcomes of interest were survival, disease control, response rate, response duration, quality of life and adverse effects. Members of the Cancer Care Ontario Hematology Disease Site Group (CCO HDSG), comprising physicians with content expertise, epidemiologists and consumers, developed a guideline through a systematic process that involved assessment of the best available evidence, consensus interpretation of the evidence and a validation process involving practitioners across the province.ResultsThe CCO HDSG recommends the use of bortezomib-based combinations in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma who are candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation and in individuals who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation. The group further recommends the use of bortezomib, alone or in combination, for patients with relapsed/refractory disease. The evidence did not establish a subgroup of patients with myeloma that should be uniquely targeted for therapy with bortezomib. Qualifying statements by the HDSG address alternative dosing options, the management of cytopenias and the prevention of toxicities, including herpes zoster reactivation.ConclusionsBortezomib alone or in combination with other agents can be recommended for both previously untreated or relapsed/refractory patients with multiple myeloma. Guidelines for monitoring and reducing toxicity are provided.     

An observational, retrospective analysis of retreatment with bortezomib for multiple myeloma

PurposeThe aim of this retrospective chart review of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) was to describe patterns of retreatment with bortezomib-based therapy and responses to retreatment in a community-based setting.Patients and MethodsData were retrospectively extracted from the medical records of patients treated in US Oncology—affiliated community oncology clinics who received 2 separate treatments with bortezomib-based therapy. Eligible patients had ≥ 60 days between treatments and ≥ 4 bortezomib doses during initial treatment. Responses were determined primarily by laboratory values. Response categories included (1) very good partial response (VGPR), ≥ 90% M-protein decrease; (2) partial response (PR), 50%–89% decrease; and (3) less than PR (< PR), < 50% decrease, excluding progressive disease (PD).ResultsRetreatment response data were available for 82 patients; 5 (6%) had VGPR, 12 (15%) had PR, 52 (63%) had < PR, 5 (6%) had PD, and 8 (10%) died. Among 62 patients with response assessments for initial treatment and retreatment, VGPR/PR rates to retreatment were 44%, 23%, and 13% among patients with VGPR, PR, and < PR to initial treatment, respectively. Median time between bortezomib treatments was 9.7 months; 29% of patients received non-bortezomib therapy between treatments. The most common treatment pattern (58% of patients) was single-agent bortezomib at initial treatment and retreatment. Toxicity contributed to discontinuation in 38% of patients during initial treatment and 22% during retreatment; rates of neuropathy contributing to discontinuation were 18% and 6%, respectively.ConclusionRetreatment with bortezomib-based therapy is feasible, with predictable toxicities. This observational analysis supports bortezomib alone or in combination as a retreatment option after initial bortezomib treatment in patients with relapsed MM.     

Chemotherapeutic Agents Increase the Risk for Pulmonary Function Test Abnormalities in Patients With Multiple Myeloma

BackgroundMultiple myeloma is a common malignancy accounting for approximately 1% of all malignancies worldwide. Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and thalidomide are immunomodulatory derivatives that are used in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). There have been case reports of pulmonary disease associated with these agents, but the effect of these agents on pulmonary function test (PFT) results is unknown.Patients and MethodsWe reviewed the records of 343 patients with MM who underwent PFTs before autologous stem cell transplantation. One hundred nine patients had not received any of the 3 medications, whereas 234 had received 1 or more of these agents.ResultsPatients exposed to bortezomib were more likely to have obstructive PFT results (P = .015) when compared with patients not exposed to this medication. Restrictive PFT results were more likely after exposure to thalidomide (P = .017). A logistic regression model was performed and when adjusted for age, sex, Durie-Salmon (DS) stage, body mass index (BMI), time from diagnosis to transplantation in days, and smoking history, the odds of obstruction were 1.96 times higher for patients who received bortezomib. The odds of restriction were 1.97 times higher after exposure to thalidomide.ConclusionThere appears to be a risk of PFT abnormalities developing in patients treated with bortezomib and thalidomide.     

Bortezomib in combination with dexamethasone and subsequent thalidomide for newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma: A Chinese experience

ObjectiveBortezomib–dexamethasone–thalidomide has been reported to be effective in newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) with an overall response rate of 92% and a CR rate of 18% (Alexanian et al, Hematology 2007;12(3):235–9), but this regimen has not been tested in the Chinese patients. We report here our results testing with this combination in the Chinese population and to investigate the efficacy and safety of bortezomib in combination of dexamethasone plus subsequent thalidomide as primary treatment for MM.MethodsBetween June 2006 and March 2008, 20 consecutive newly-diagnosed patients with symptomatic MM were treated with bortezomib at 1.3 mg/m² IV on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 and dexamethasone at 20 mg/m² IV daily on the day of bortezomib and the day after. All patients received daily oral thalidomide that was escalated from 100 mg to 200 mg. Fourteen patients were male and 6 were female. Median age was 59 years (range 43–86 years). 11 patients were stage 2 according to the International Staging System, 8 were stage 3, only 1 patient was stage 1. All patients received a median of two cycles of therapy (range 1–6). The EBMT criteria were used for response evaluation. Toxicities were evaluated according to the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria version 3.Results16 out of 20 patients (80%) achieved PR and 3 (15%) achieved CR; therefore the overall response rate was 95%. With a median follow-up duration of 7.8 months (4–22 months), no patients died. Grade 3–4 toxicities included fatigue (3/20), thrombocytopenia (10/20) diarrhea (5/20) and orthostatic hypotension (3/20) Grade 2 neuropathy occurred in four out of 20 patients and herpes zoster occurred in four out of 20 patients. Routine anticoagulation or anti-thrombosis was not used. Only 1 patient suffered from DVT/PE.ConclusionsOur preliminary experience in Chinese patients indicated that bortezomib–dexamethasone–thalidomide is highly effective in newly-diagnosed MM. Grade three and 4 toxicities are rare after median 2 cycles of therapy. The relative lower rates of neuropathy and DVT/PE in the Chinese patients with MM are being cautiously observed.     

KRD-PACE Mobilization for Multiple Myeloma Patients With Significant Residual Disease Before Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation

BackgroundBortezomib has been incorporated into thalidomide and dexamethasone provided with cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (PACE) as an intensive regimen before autologous stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma (MM). We examined MM patients at our center who received chemomobilization with a regimen that substituted carfilzomib and lenalidomide for bortezomib and thalidomide (KRD-PACE).Patients and MethodsThis was a retrospective study of 27 MM patients who received KRD-PACE for chemomobilization. Our analysis included patients who had circulating plasma cells (CPCs) by flow cytometry, ≥ 10% bone marrow plasma cells (BMPC), a monoclonal protein ≥ 1 g/dL, or an involved serum free light chain ≥ 10 mg/dL.ResultsThe most common indication for KRD-PACE was BMPC ≥ 10% in 16 patients (60%), followed by CPCs in 11 (41%). The median (range) age was 61 (35-69) years, and the median (range) BMPC before treatment was 10% (5%-47%). The overall response rate was 43%, and a median (range) of 20.24 (8.08-69.88) × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg were collected. CPC clearance rate was 50%, and the median reduction in BMPC was 75%. Two patients had sinus bradycardia and 5 (19%) had neutropenic fever.ConclusionKRD-PACE is an effective therapy to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells in MM patients with residual disease burden. This regimen was successful at clearing CPCs and reducing BMPC burden, with an overall response rate of 43%. Despite theoretical concern regarding the combination of 3 cardiotoxic agents, we observed a low frequency of cardiac issues.     

Phase 1 Trial Evaluating Vorinostat Plus Bortezomib,Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

IntroductionBortezomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRD) is a standard induction therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. Given preclinical and clinical data suggesting the synergistic activity of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat with both bortezomib and lenalidomide for the treatment of multiple myeloma, we hypothesized that adding vorinostat to VRD (R2V2) would increase the rate and the quality of responses to induction treatment. Here we report the results of a phase 1 trial (NCT01038388) evaluating R2V2 as up-front treatment for NDMM patients.Patients and MethodsR2V2 was tested as induction therapy in a dose-escalation phase 1 study in 30 NDMM patients deemed eligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation. Treatment consisted of 4 induction cycles with R2V2, followed by either autologous stem-cell transplantation or 4 additional R2V2 cycles and lenalidomide maintenance therapy.ResultsThe maximum tolerated dose of vorinostat was 200 mg daily. The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal (87%), fatigue and peripheral neuropathy (60%), and thrombocytopenia (33%). R2V2 induced an objective response in 96% of patients, with 48% obtaining at least a complete remission. Median progression-free survival was 52 months, with 77% of patients alive at 5 years.ConclusionR2V2 as induction treatment for NDMM patients resulted in remarkable response rates at the cost of increased toxicity.