Inpatient hospitalizations of U.S. military personnel medically evacuated from Iraq and Afghanistan with combat-related traumatic brain injury

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been called the signature wound of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF). The aim of the present study was to describe and assess the incidence of inpatient hospitalizations of U.S. military personnel who were medically evacuated from OIF and OEF with combat-related TBI. Inpatient medical records from 2003 to 2008 were used to determine incident episodes of TBI requiring hospitalization in Landstuhl or CONUS Regional Medical Centers. Denominator data for calculating incidence rates were available from the Defense Manpower Data Center. During the study period, 1,213 U.S. military personnel from OIF and OEF were hospitalized with combat-related TBI. Of these, the largest proportion (40.9%) occurred in 2007. The rate of inpatient hospitalization with TBI was 10.4 per 10,000 troop strength (95% confidence interval: 9.9, 10.9). Future research should examine the incidence of TBI in-theater and include an analysis by injury severity.     

Deployment risk factors and postdeployment health profiles associated with traumatic brain injury in heavy drinking veterans

Along with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is considered one of the "signature wounds" of combat operations in Iraq (Operation Iraqi Freedom [OIF]) and Afghanistan (Operation Enduring Freedom [OEF]), but the role of mTBI in the clinical profiles of Veterans with other comorbid forms of post-deployment psychopathology is poorly understood. The current study explored the deployment risk and postdeployment health profiles of heavy drinking OIF and OEF Veterans as a function of mTBI. Sixty-nine heavy-drinking OIF/OEF Veterans were recruited through a Veterans' Affairs Medical Center and completed questionnaires and structured interviews assessing war-zone experiences, postdeployment drinking patterns, and PTSD symptoms. Veterans with positive mTBI screens and confirmed mTBI diagnoses endorsed higher rates of combat experiences, including direct and indirect killing, and met criteria for PTSD at a higher rate than Veterans without a history of mTBI. Both PTSD and combat experiences independently predicted screening positive for mTBI, whereas only combat experiences predicted receiving a confirmed mTBI diagnosis. mTBI was not associated with any dimension of alcohol use. These results support a growing body of literature linking mTBI with PTSD.     

Test-retest reliability of the Traumatic Brain Injury Screening Instrument

The Traumatic Brain Injury Screening Instrument (TBISI) was implemented in Veterans Affairs medical facilities in an attempt to identify Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) veterans with possible mild TBI. Despite its widespread implementation, the reliability and validity of the screening tool has not yet been established. The current study reports preliminary findings on the test-retest reliability of the TBISI in 44 OEF/OIF veterans referred for neuropsychological evaluation following a positive TBI screen. Results suggest overall poor test-retest reliability of the TBI screening tool with regard to type of event, injuries sustained, and resulting sequelae. These findings underscore the importance of further investigation of its psychometric properties to promote accurate identification and referral of veterans with possible TBI.     

Health service support in Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm.

Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm have brought into focus a number of difficulties with the medical support of U.S. Army tactical forces. These difficulties include inadequate preparation of Medical Corps officers for command, inadequate medical training of field medical unit personnel, and problems utilizing available equipment to support Operation Desert Storm tactical operations. This paper will discuss these difficulties, potential solutions for these difficulties, and some unresolved issues created by or despite these potential solutions.     

Postdeployment health care for returning OEF/OIF military personnel and their social networks: a qualitative approach

Little is known regarding the health care needs of Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) deployed veterans seeking care outside of Veterans Affairs facilities. Responding to this gap, we conducted a mixed methods study of postdeployment health among veterans and members of their social networks in six community-based primary care clinics. A total of 347 patients completed a survey dealing with deployment to Iraq/Afghanistan (whether their own or that of a family member, friend, or coworker), and subsequent psychosocial and health problems. A subset of 52 participants responded to an open-ended question requesting additional information about experiences during and postdeployment. Content analysis of these responses revealed five overarching themes: connectedness, perceptions of conflict, consequences of deployment, health and treatment concerns, and respect and concern for service members/veterans. These data point to significant deployment-related disruptions in the well-being of service members and those in their broader social networks, with implications for defining service needs in community health settings.     

Injury and illness casualty distributions among U.S. Army and Marine Corps personnel during Operation Iraqi Freedom

The objective of this study was to evaluate the distributions of U.S. Marine Corps and Army wounded in action (WIA) and disease and nonbattle injury (DNBI) casualties during Operation Iraqi Freedom Major Combat Phase (OIF-1) and Support and Stability Phase (OIF-2). A retrospective review of hospitalization data was conducted. chi2 tests were used to assess the Primary International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9), diagnostic category distributions by phase of operation, casualty type, and gender. Of the 13,071 casualties identified for analysis, 3,263 were WIA and 9,808 were DNBI. Overall, the proportion of WIA was higher during OIF-1 (36.6%) than OIF-2 (23.6%). Marines had a higher proportion of WIA and nonbattle injuries than soldiers. Although overall DNBI distributions for men and women were statistically different, their distributions of types of nonbattle injuries were similar. Identifying differences in injury and illness distributions by characteristics of the casualty population is necessary for military medical readiness planning.     

Investigational drugs and vaccines fielded in support of Operation Desert Storm.

Development of medical countermeasures for chemical and biological threats is a mission of the U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command. Several such countermeasures were fielded during Operation Desert Shield/Storm and a controversy developed in the press and in the courts over the use of these "experimental drugs" in service members. Far from experimental, these drugs were, however, fielded as "investigational" products. Describing the products as investigational is a result of Food and Drug Administration regulations, not a comment on the extent to which the products have been tested.     

A brief survey of chemical defense, crew rest, and heat stress/physical training issues related to Operation Desert Storm.

A brief questionnaire was administered to 148 soldiers, over two-thirds of whom were aviators, at the conclusion of Desert Storm. Questions were asked about chemical defense, work/rest schedules, an aspect of pharmacological support, and heat stress/physical training during Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm. Follow-up face-to-face interviews also were conducted with some respondents. Some of the most noteworthy findings concerned (1) training issues and side effects related to pyridostigmine bromide, (2) problems with chemical defense clothing, (3) suggestions for improving crew rest, and (4) facts about the ways in which heat-related difficulties were minimized.     

Female health care during Operation Desert Storm: the Eighth Evacuation Hospital experience.

Little has been published concerning female soldiers' health care during combat. Therefore, a retrospective review of the Eighth Evacuation Hospital's gynecological records was performed while involved in Operation Desert Shield/Storm. Additionally, a health care survey was distributed to female soldiers. This review revealed that a large part of the hospital's gynecological resources during this conflict were employed treating preventable conditions. These problems could have been avoided if appropriate measures had been taken prior to deployment. It was concluded that all female soldiers should be required to undergo a gynecological health care screen prior to deployments.     

Rapid host nation medical deployment.

Rapid development of land-based units in Operation Desert Shield/Storm presented critical needs for medical support. Integration of small Navy mobile medical teams in Bahrain and a larger United States Army Hospital unit in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, at host nation hospitals presented an innovative method of providing this support. The success of these ventures in convenience and quality of care establishes the host nation interaction with military medical professionals as a workable, satisfying, and important adjunct to standard military medical care.     

Role of the independent duty corpsman on the USNS Comfort (T-AH 20): the Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm experience.

Independent duty corpsmen (IDCs) have a significant role in providing health care on the USNS Comfort (T-AH 20). The IDCs are responsible for staffing sick call, emergency response teams, and resuscitation/stabilization teams. IDCs are trained in advanced patient care and in medical administrative and logistical duties. During peacetime, their function often focuses on primary care to the decrement of skills necessary to perform in medical emergencies. The Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm mobilization has emphasized the need for Navy medicine to continue its support of IDC training so that they are kept in a state of preparedness to competently deliver the full spectrum of care that is expected of them.     

Preparations for war in a Saudi Arabian host nation hospital.

This paper describes how the King Fahad National Guard Hospital in Riyadh, The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, integrated United States Army (USA) medical units and prepared the hospital to receive war casualties during Operation Desert Storm. In particular, preparation of the hospital, the staff, and military systems are reviewed. The report will also discuss operations at the hospital during Operation Desert Storm and the major lessons learned. Comment is provided by the host nation hospital regarding the impact of the experience with the USA medical units and their personnel.     

Visceral leishmaniasis in a soldier returning from Operation Enduring Freedom

This report presents a case of visceral leishmaniasis in a soldier returning from Operation Enduring Freedom. During the United States' last major military conflict, Operation Desert Storm, the diagnosis of multiple cases of visceral leishmaniasis led to policy changes, including a temporary ban on troop blood donation. This case demonstrates the applicability of recently developed Leishmania polymerase chain reaction and serological assays when conventional methods of diagnosis, such as tissue microscopy and culture, fail.     

Aeromedical evacuation: remembering the past, bridging to the future

Operations Desert Shield/Desert Storm saw the largest mobilization of aeromedical evacuation (AE) assets since the Vietnam War. Ultimately, more than 1,950 AE personnel were deployed to support the medical airlift of personnel. With aircrews based at 17 locations in the region, at its peak the system could move up to 3,600 intratheater and 2,500 intertheater casualties per day. Fortunately, the demand for AE fell far short of predictions. During the period from August 12, 1990, to March 31, 1991, more than 12,500 patients were successfully airlifted using converted cargo aircraft, a concept originally validated in World War II. The authors describe the Operations Desert Shield/Desert Storm AE system and identify the efforts underway to construct a new aeromedical evacuation system capable of meeting the needs of the battlefield of the 21st century.     

War crimes during the Persian Gulf War.

Evidence of violations of the 1949 Geneva Conventions by Iraq's military personnel during Desert Shield and Desert Storm are described and adverse effects on the Kuwaiti health care delivery system are discussed. New diplomatic and military initiatives that include education and accountability are needed to ensure better compliance with international conventions designed to protect victims of war.     

Comparison of Operation Iraqi Freedom and Patient Workload Generator injury distributions

The Patient Workload Generator (PATGEN) simulation model is an important part of the Army Medical Department force requirement planning. The current version of the PATGEN model is based on historical major combat operations such as World War II and the Korean War. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was a significant difference between injury distributions used in the PATGEN model and the injury distributions based on the data from Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF). To make the comparison feasible, the PATGEN injury categories were created using the Barell Injury Matrix. Analyses were performed using two independent OIF data sources, the Joint Theater Trauma Registry and the Standard Inpatient Data Record. Based on X2 test results, both analyses suggest a significant difference between PATGEN and OIF injury distributions. A major concern is the underestimation by PATGEN of battle injuries with multiple wounds. The findings support future use of data-driven diagnosis-based injury distributions for current operations and new more flexible simulation models that will allow for changes in injury probability distributions.     

The U.S. Navy's forward resuscitative surgery system during Operation Iraqi Freedom

The forward resuscitative surgery system (FRSS) is the Navy's most forward-deployed echelon II medical unit. Between March and August 2003, six FRSS teams were deployed in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF). During the combat phase of OIF (March 21 to May 1, 2003), a total of 34 Marine Corps and 62 Iraqi patients underwent treatment at a FRSS. FRSS teams were assigned two distinct missions; "forward" FRSS teams operated with combat service support elements in direct support of regimental combat teams, and "jump" FRSS teams served as a forward element of a surgical company. This article presents the experiences of the FRSS teams in OIF, including a discussion of time to presentation from wounding, time to operation, time to evacuation, and lessons learned from the deployment of the FRSS.     

A review of orthopedic injuries in three recent U.S. military conflicts

We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with orthopedic injuries evacuated to a single medical center to evaluate the treatment and outcome of these injuries in three recent U.S. military conflicts: Operation Urgent Fury (Grenada), Operation Desert Shield/Storm (southwest Asia), and Operation Restore Hope (Somalia). Sixteen orthopedic casualties were originally treated at the medical detachment in Grenada before evacuation to the medical center. Most of these injuries were gunshot wounds to the extremities (11), with three known open fractures. Two patients (three extremities) sustained traumatic amputation (19% amputation rate). One hundred eighty-one patients with orthopedic injuries were medically evacuated from southeast Asia to the medical center for definitive treatment. Of these injuries, there were 143 fractures in 69 patients. One hundred of these fractures were open fractures, and 60% of these injuries were blast injuries. Furthermore, there were 26 amputations (14%). Twenty-two patients with orthopedic injuries were treated in Somalia and evacuated to the medical center. Thirteen of the 22 patients (59%) sustained gunshot wounds, and 2 (9%) sustained blast injuries. There were eight open fractures (36%) and three amputations in two patients (14%). Three of the 22 patients underwent successful limb salvage when ablation was the only other surgical alternative. It appears that a large percentage of medical center evacuations from military conflicts are for orthopedic injuries. Many of these injuries are the result of high-velocity weapons or blast injuries. Regardless of the size and/or purpose of the intervention, similar injury patterns and severity can be expected, because 51% of orthopedic patients had open fractures. Similarly, the rate of amputation associated with extremity trauma has not varied significantly since the Vietnam War.     

The battalion medical platoon: a flawed scalpel.

This article discusses the current organization and doctrine for a medical platoon in an armour-heavy task force in light of experience gained in Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm. The organization of and doctrine for the use of the platoon is covered first. This is followed by a discussion of how doctrine was modified based on field exercises, and projected, and actual, combat operations. It concludes with a presentation of lessons learned and recommendations for changes.