Liver lacerations--a marker of severe but sometimes subtle intra-abdominal injuries in adults

Experience with conservative management of solid viscus injuries from abdominal trauma in children has produced the impetus for a similar management in adults. To explore the implications of such a policy, we reviewed the records of 82 patients with hepatic injuries noted at laparotomy. Indications for laparotomy were positive findings on diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) or CT scan, or a history of penetrating trauma. The liver injuries were graded according to severity: grade I, 19 patients; grade II, 20 patients (low severity = LS); grade III, 14 patients; grade IV, 6 patients (high severity = HS). Twenty-three injuries were not classified by the operating surgeon. Of the 53 patients with blunt hepatic trauma, 23 (43%) had concomitant injuries that required operative intervention. Twenty-nine patients had penetrating liver injuries. Fourteen (48%) had associated injuries requiring intervention. Patients most likely to have nonoperative management, those with grade I and grade II liver injuries (LS), comprised 48 of the total. In this subgroup there were 26 (54.2%) associated injuries requiring operative intervention. Shock could not be used as a factor to differentiate patients not requiring operative intervention. Nineteen of the LS patients requiring operative intervention secondary to associated injury were never in shock. In adult trauma victims positive DPL findings secondary to minor hepatic injuries that might not require operative intervention serve as a marker for associated injuries that do require operation. The risk of nonoperative management of hepatic injuries based upon radiologic diagnosis is not the result of complications from the hepatic injury.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Modified Technique of Mesh Hepatorrhaphy for Management of Juxtahepatic Venous Injury in a Case of Blunt Liver Trauma: A Case Report

The liver is the most frequently injured organ in cases of blunt abdominal trauma. Injuries to the caudate lobe are rarely isolated and usually associated with retrohepatic caval injury or hepatic vein injury. The management of the associated vascular injuries is usually difficult owing to the short courses of the hepatic veins and the difficulty in obtaining proximal and distal control of the suprarenal and suprahepatic inferior vena cava – hence the frequency of perihepatic packing in the management of caudate lobe and hepatic venous injuries. We present here a rare case of the failure of perihepatic packing to effectively control hemorrhage from blunt injury to the caudate lobe and retrohepatic vena cava. A case of blunt abdominal trauma with injury to the caudate lobe and retrohepatic venous injury was initially managed with perihepatic packing. The patient developed hemorrhage 48 h after pack removal, which was then successfully managed with mesh hepatorrhaphy of the caudate lobe.     

Selective management of blunt hepatic injuries including nonoperative management is a safe and effective strategy

BACKGROUND: The justification and preference for operative versus nonoperative management of hepatic injuries caused by blunt trauma remains ambiguous. This review assesses the outcome of operative and nonoperative management of liver injury after blunt trauma. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the demographics, severity of injury, severity of liver injury, associated concomitant injuries, management scheme, and outcome of patients with documented hepatic injury from 1993 to 2003. RESULTS: The overall mortality rate was 9.4%, with 3.7% caused by the liver injury itself. Fifty-nine percent (330 of 561) of liver injuries were of low severity (grades I and II), with an overall mortality rate of 6.6% caused by concomitant injuries and liver-related mortality of 0%. Forty-one percent (231 of 561) of liver injuries were high-severity injuries (grades III, IV, and V). Mortality for nonoperative management of high-severity liver injuries was 2.2%. If operative intervention was required because of hemodynamic instability or concomitant injuries then the mortality rate was significantly higher at 30%. Forty-two of the 378 (11%) liver injuries treated nonoperatively required an adjunctive procedure for successful management. CONCLUSIONS: Selective management of liver injuries presented a low liver-related mortality rate. Low-grade injuries can be managed nonoperatively with excellent results. High-grade injuries can be managed nonoperatively, if operative intervention is not required for hemodynamic instability or associated injuries, with a low mortality. In these patients, adjunctive procedures will be required selectively for successful nonoperative management of high-grade liver injuries. High-grade injuries requiring operative management because of hemodynamic instability or concomitant injuries continue to have significantly higher mortality.     

A statewide, population-based time-series analysis of the increasing frequency of nonoperative management of abdominal solid organ injury.

Emergency operative intervention has been one of the cornerstones of the care of the injured patient. Over the past several years, nonoperative management has increasing been recommended for the care of selected blunt abdominal solid organ injuries. The purpose of this study was to utilize a large statewide, population-based data set to perform a time-series analysis of the practice of physicians caring for blunt solid organ injury of the abdomen. The study was designed to assess the changing frequency and the outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatments for blunt hepatic and splenic injuries. METHODS: Data were obtained from the state hospital discharge data base, which tracks information on all hospitalized patients from each of the 157 hospitals in the state of North Carolina. All trauma patients who had sustained injury to a solid abdominal organ (kidney, liver, or spleen) were selected for initial analysis. RESULTS: During the 5 years of the study, 210,256 trauma patients were admitted to the state's hospitals (42,051 +/- 7802 per year). The frequency of nonoperative interventions for hepatic and splenic injuries increased over the period studied. The frequency of nonoperative management of hepatic injuries increased from 55% in 1988 to 79% in 1992 in patients with hepatic injuries and from 34% to 46% in patients with splenic injuries. The rate of nonoperative management of hepatic injuries increased from 54% to 64% in nontrauma centers compared with an increase from 56% to 74% in trauma centers (p = 0.01). In patients with splenic injuries, the rate of nonoperative management increased from 35% to 44% in nontrauma centers compared with an increase from 33% to 49% in trauma centers (p < 0.05). The rate of nonoperative management was associated with the organ injury severity, ranging from 90% for minor injuries to 19%-40% for severe injuries. Finally, in an attempt to compare blood use in operatively and nonoperatively treated patients, the total charges for blood were compared in the two groups. When compared, based on organ injury severity, the total blood used, as measured by charges, was lower for nonoperatively treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: This large, statewide, population-based time-series analysis shows that the management of blunt injury of solid abdominal organs has changed over time. The incidence of nonoperative management for both hepatic and splenic injuries has increased. The study indicates that the rates of nonoperative management vary in relation to the severity of the organ injury. The rates increase in nonoperative management were greater in trauma centers than in nontrauma centers. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that this newer approach to the care of blunt injury of solid abdominal organs is being led by the state's trauma centers.     

Hepatic enzymes have a role in the diagnosis of hepatic injury after blunt abdominal trauma

Introduction

Delayed diagnosis of patients with severe liver injuries is associated with an adverse outcome. As computed tomographic (CT) scan is not always available in the management of blunt abdominal trauma worldwide, the present study was undertaken to determine the accuracy of selected haematological markers in predicting the presence of hepatic injury and its severity after blunt abdominal trauma.

Methods

A retrospective review of all patients with blunt abdominal trauma presented to our institution over a 3-year period was performed. Patients were excluded if they suffered penetrating injuries, died in the emergency department or if the required blood tests were not performed within 24 h of the accident. The grading of the hepatic injury was verified using CT scans or surgical findings.

Results

Ninety-nine patients with blunt abdominal trauma had the required blood tests performed and were included in the study. The median injury severity score was 24 (range 4-75). Fifty-five patients had hepatic injuries, of which 47.3% were minor (Grades I and II) while 52.7% had major hepatic injuries (Grades III-V). There were no patients with Grade VI injuries.A raised ALT was strongly associated with presence of hepatic injuries (OR, 109.8; 95% CI, 25.81-466.9). This relation was also seen in patients with raised AST > 2 times (OR, 21.33; 95% CI, 7.27-62.65). This difference was not seen in both bilirubin and ALP.ALT > 2 times normal was associated with major hepatic injuries (OR, 7.15; 95% CI, 1.38-37.14; p = 0.012) while patients with simultaneous raised AST > 2 times and ALT > 2 times had a stronger association for major hepatic injuries (OR, 8.44; 95% CI, 1.64-43.47).

Conclusion

Abnormal transaminases levels are associated with hepatic injuries after blunt abdominal trauma. Patients with ALT and AST > 2 times normal should be assumed to possess major hepatic trauma and managed accordingly. Patients with normal ALT, AST and LDH are unlikely to have major liver injuries.     

Chirurgische Therapie, prognostische Faktoren und Ergebnisse beim Lebertrauma

Hepatic trauma is a rare surgical emergency with significant morbidity and mortality. Extensive experience in liver surgery is a prerequisite for the management of these injuries. The medical records of 68 consecutive patients with hepatic trauma were retrospectively reviewed for the severity of liver injury, management, morbidity, mortality, and risk factors.Of the patients, 14 were treated conservatively and 52 surgically (24 suture/fibrin glue, 16 perihepatic packing, 11 resections, 1 liver transplantation). Two patients died just before emergency surgery could be performed. Overall mortality was 21% (14/68), and 13, 14, 6, 27, and 50% for types I, II, III, IV, and V injuries, respectively. Only nine deaths (all type IV and V) were liver related, while four were caused by extrahepatic injuries and one by concomitant liver cirrhosis. With respect to treatment, conservative management, suture, and resection had a low mortality of 0, 4, and 9%, respectively. In contrast, mortality was 47% in patients in whom only packing was performed (in severe injuries). Stepwise multivariate regression analysis proved prothrombin values <40%, ISS scores >30, and transfusion requirements of more than 10 red packed cells to be significant risk factors for post-traumatic death.Type I-III hepatic injuries can safely be treated by conservative or simple surgical means. However, complex hepatic injuries (types IV and V) carry a significant mortality and may require hepatic surgery, including liver resection or even transplantation. Therefore, patients with severe hepatic injuries should be treated in a specialized institution.     

Blunt liver injury in childhood: evolution of therapy and current perspective

One hundred eighty-eight consecutive children with serious blunt abdominal or multisystem trauma were evaluated between August 1981 and July 1985. Of the 188 patients, 53 (28%) were found to have hepatic parenchymal injuries and are the basis of this report. Four of the 53 (8%) underwent emergency laparotomy for exsanguinating hemorrhage; two patients died, both of hepatic vein lacerations, and two are alive and well after right hepatic lobectomy. Forty-nine (92%) of the children with liver injuries did not require operation for hemorrhage. Four of these 49 patients developed serious complications; hemobilia occurred in one patient and bile peritonitis occurred in three. The one case of hemobilia was resolved without surgery. One child underwent a delayed operative biliary tract reconstruction that was successful. The other two children required a combination of debridement and drainage procedures. Fifty-one of the 53 children (96%) are currently alive without morbidity related to their liver injuries. Both children who died had multiple trauma including central nervous system injuries and had exsanguinating hemorrhage that required emergency laparotomy at initial evaluation. There were no children with "late" hemorrhage and none who developed septic complications. Nonoperative management of most childhood blunt abdominal trauma is possible. Widespread use of abdominal computerized tomography scanning has made this approach practical. This large series of consecutive liver injuries from a large pediatric trauma center illustrates the advantages and the risks of a selective but primarily nonoperative approach to liver trauma in children.     

Renal trauma in children.

In children the kidney is the organ most frequently injured as a result of blunt abdominal trauma. Controversy exists as to the management of injuries of intermediate severity. At the H?pital Sainte Justine in Montreal, from 1970 to 1976, 71 children aged 2 to 15 years were admitted because of renal trauma caused by blunt abdominal injury. Class I or II lesions (minor injuries) were found in 69% and class III or IV lesions (major or critical injuries) in 31%. Several severe injuries were treated conservatively. There was one death due to multiple associated injuries. Ten patients underwent surgery; nephrectomy was performed in one and heminephrectomy in two patients. One patient with an avulsion injury to the pedicle survived after "bench surgery" and reimplantation of the bruised kidney. Follow-up was obtained in 57 patients; 2 showed posttraumatic scarring. None required subsequent nephrectomy for hypertension or infection.     

Traumatic hepatic duct injury: New approach to surgical management

Blunt traumatic injury to the biliary tract is rare, and its management is one of the most difficult and challenging problems confronting surgeons. If disruption occurs in the hepatic ducts, occult ductal injury may even go unnoticed. A high index of suspicion is the single most important factor leading to the identification and successful management of these injuries. A patient with massive upper abdominal injuries secondary to blunt trauma is reported on. Intraoperative cholangiography demonstrated bilateral hepatic duct transection. The injury was successfully managed by Roux-en-Y hepatoportal enterostomy, an approach that has not been previously reported. Primary repair or hepatic cholangiojejunostomy is the treatment of choice for hepatic duct injuries. Hepatoportal enterostomy, however, offers a satisfactory alternative in treatment when the patient is unstable or when primary repair is not possible. The literature is reviewed and the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of nonpenetrating injuries to the biliary tract are discussed.     

Traumatic handlebar hernia associated with hepatic herniation: a case report and review of the literature

A traumatic abdominal wall hernia (TAWH) is a rare type of hernia that occurs after blunt trauma to the abdomen. TAWH caused by direct trauma from bicycle handlebars is even more rare with fewer than 30 cases having being reported. Recognition of these hernias is important, because they may be associated with significant intrabdominal injuries. Despite an overall increase in incidence of blunt abdominal trauma, cases of TAWH remain rare, probably because of elasticity of the abdominal wall resists the shear forces generated by a traumatic impact. A high level of clinical suspicion is required for diagnosis of TAWH in patients with handlebar injuries. We present the case of a 20-year-old man with a traumatic handlebar hernia associated with herniation of the liver and hepatic ductal injury, which was managed successfully by a delayed repair of the hernia.     

Liver injuries

The liver is the most commonly injured abdominal organ. Severe hepatic trauma continue to be associated with high mortality. Management of liver injuries has changed significantly over the last two decades. Nonoperative management of hemodynamically stable patients has become the first treatment of choice. In unstable patients immediate control of bleeding is critical. In the management of severe injuries of the liver, particularly for patients who had developed a metabolic insult (hypothermia, coagulopathy, and acidosis), perihepatic packing has emerged as the key to effective damage control (DCS). The surgical aim is control of hemorrhage, preservation of sufficient hepatic function and prevention of secondary complications. Currently available surgical methods include hepatorrhaphy, resectional debridement, anatomical/nonanatomical resection, selective hepatic artery ligation, Pringle maneuver, total vascular exclusion, liver transplatation. This review discusses available diagnostic modalities and the best management options for liver injury, based on literature search and authors experience.     

Hanging manuever in liver trauma

The phylosophy of aggressive surgical approach, its complete implementation in liver trauma surgery did not appear efficient. No matter of permanenent development of diagnostic imaging methods, anesthesia, intensive therapy, medical technology and suture materials, operational theater and operative tchniques, major liver resections in trauma had mortality rate up to 60%. With introduction of computerized tomography (CT, 1981) in everyday clinical praxis and with better evaluation of trauma patients, the whole approach to liver trauma patient has been redesigned. Based on AAST-OIS classification, almost 70% of traumatized with grade I, II and III sholud be treated non-operatively, hospitally, with repeating FAST (focused abdominal ultrasound in trauma) and abdominal CT scans. The rest of traumatized patients, with grade IV and V injuries of juxtahepatic structures demand complexive surgical treatment. The modalities of surgical treatment depend on trauma mechanisms, extensivity, anatomical localisation and affection of vascular structures. Hanging Manuevr--the Method of French surgeon Belghiti bases on anterior approach in liver resection is a try for fast solution for fatal bleeding in liver trauma. It consists of placing the elastic cord throughout the anterior surface of VCI or ligamentum venosusm, of upper end of the cord is located in superior part of VCI where hepatic veins are emerging. Lower end of the cord is located in subhepatic part of VCI between 3 Glisonian pedicles. Concerning hepatic veins liver is divided in 3 sections, which derives blood in right hepatic vein RHV, middle hepatic vein MHV and left hepatic vein LHV. Belghiti proposed the usage of hanging maneuver when resecting the right liver, while the cord is placed throughout retrohepatic VCI, lower end between elements of Glisonian pedicle and upper end between hepatic veins. Complications like bleeding from caudal veins are minimal, then speed in liver resection in hemodynamic unstable and ishemic patient, defects like bleeding because compressing tapes or lesions IVC tile mobilazion of liver for conventional resection.     

Pediatric blunt liver injury: establishment of criteria for appropriate management

There is no consensus regarding the most appropriate management of pediatric blunt liver injury. This study addresses this issue by reviewing our experience with blunt liver trauma in relationship to the grade of injury. Forty-one pediatric patients with blunt abdominal trauma and documented liver injury were managed from 1979 to 1989. Fifteen (37%) underwent celiotomy. Three children had extensive parenchymal injuries (grade IV or V) requiring resection and three others died intraoperatively, secondary to exsanguinating hemorrhage of associated injuries (grade V) to the hepatic veins and inferior vena cava. The need for celiotomy was obvious in these patients. In 9 of the 15 children who underwent exploration (60%), bleeding from the liver injury (grade II or III) had ceased by the time of celiotomy. These children did not appear to benefit from the operation. Twenty-six of the 41 patients (63%) were selected for nonoperative management because they were hemodynamically stable after initial resuscitation and did not show signs of associated intraabdominal injuries requiring surgical intervention. These children underwent evaluation by abdominal computed axial tomography scan (grade I, II, III, and IV injuries). Blood transfusions were given to keep the hematocrit above 30%. Seventeen of the 26 children managed nonoperatively (65%) did not require blood replacement. The mean (+/- SEM) transfusion volume for the remaining nine children was 14.8 +/- 2.5 mL/kg. Blunt liver injury represents a spectrum from a minimal parenchymal hematoma to massive liver disruption. We conclude that celiotomy is necessary for hepatic injury hemodynamically stable injured children with transfusion requirements less than 40 mL/kg can be managed nonoperatively in an appropriate setting.     

Operative and nonoperative management of blunt hepatic trauma in adults: a single-center report

Background/Purpose Liver trauma, especially that as result of road traffic accidents, still remains a complicated problem in severely injured patients. The aim of this study was to extract useful conclusions from the management in order to improve the final outcome of such patients. Methods Details for 86 patients with blunt hepatic trauma who were examined and treated in our department during a 6-year period were analyzed. We retrospectively reviewed the severity of liver injury, associated injuries, treatment, and outcome. Results Forty-nine liver injuries (57%) were of low severity (grades I and II), while 37 (43%) were of high severity (grades III, IV, and V). Liver trauma with associated injury of other organs was noted in 62 (72.1%) patients. Forty-three (50%) patients underwent an exploratory laparotomy within the first 24 h of admission. Thirty-five (71.4%) of the 49 patients with low-grade hepatic injuries were managed conservatively; no mortality occurred. Six (14%) of forty-three patients with liver trauma initially considered for conservative management required surgery due to hemodynamic instability. Five (13.5%) of 37 patients who were finally managed nonoperatively required adjunctive treatment for biloma, hematoma, or biliary leakage; no mortality occurred. The overall mortality rate was 9.3%; mortality rates of 5.8% and 3.5% were due to liver injuries and concomitant injuries, respectively. Conclusions Severe hepatic injuries require surgical intervention due to hemodynamic instability. Low-grade injuries can be managed nonoperatively with excellent results, while patients with hepatic trauma with associated organ injuries require surgery, because they continue to have significantly higher mortality.     

Hepatic artery transection after blunt trauma: case presentation and review of the literature

Hepatic artery injuries sustained as a result of blunt abdominal trauma are rare. This case represents the first reported hepatic artery transection and the second hepatic artery injury described in children. Hepatic artery injuries are associated with high mortality, and their management is complex and controversial.     

Hepatic injury

Hepatic trauma occurs in approximately 5% of all admissions in emergency rooms. The anatomic location and the size of the liver make the organ even more susceptible to trauma and frequently in penetrating injuries. The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma established a detailed classification system that provides for uniform comparisons of hepatic injury. Diagnosis of hepatic injury can be sometimes easy; however the use diagnostic modalities as diagnostic peritoneal lavage, ultrasound and computed tomography allow faster and more accurate diagnosis. Nonoperative management of the hemodynamically stable patient with blunt injury has become the standard of care in most trauma centers. Few penetrating abdominal lesions allow conservative management; exceptions can be some penetrating wounds to right upper abdominal quadrant. Operative treatment of minor liver injuries requires no fixation or can only be managed with eletrocautery or little sutures. Major liver injuries continue, despite technical advances, a challenge to surgeons. Many procedures can be done as direct repair, debridement associated to resections, or even in more severe lesions, packing. This constitutes a damage control which can allow time to recovery of patient and decreasing mortality shortly after trauma.     

Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic trauma. A case report

Pancreatic trauma is uncommon and severe, combined pancreaticoduodenal injuries are rare. Different surgical techniques for the management of these injuries have been used. In this article a case of severe pancreaticoduodenal injury which required pancreaticoduodenectomy is reported. This case is unusual because there was no history of trauma, the serum amylase level and abdominal radiograph were normal and the abdominal findings on admission to hospital were minimal. A system of grading pancreatic trauma in terms of severity is advocated and the management of pancreaticoduodenal injuries is discussed.     

Nonoperative management of solid organ injuries. Past, present, and future

All patients with injuries to the solid organs of the abdomen and who are hemodynamically stable should be considered candidates for nonoperative management after their injuries have been staged by abdominal CT scanning, but because the CT stage of the injury does not always predict which patients require laparotomy, these patients must remain under the care of experienced trauma surgeons who can not only recognize the presence of an associated hollow viscus injury in need of repair but also will be readily available to operate if the nonoperative approach fails. Until continued bleeding can be safely ruled out, a period of close monitoring in an ICU-like setting seems warranted. Although delayed bleeding from the liver seems extremely rare, delayed rupture of the spleen and continued hemorrhage into the retroperitoneum from an injured kidney are not unusual, so patients with splenic and renal injuries should be considered candidates for repeat imaging procedures before discharge. Others likely to benefit from a second look at their injuries include patients with subcapsular hematomas, patients with recognized extravasation on the initial scan, and athletes anxious to return to contact sports. Experience from major trauma centers suggests that the incidence of missed intestinal injuries is low in adults and children managed nonoperatively, but surgeons must be diligent in monitoring for increasing abdominal pain, abdominal distention, vomiting, and signs of inflammation, which may be delayed manifestations of intestinal disruption. Patients with vascular injuries (grade V injuries to the spleen, liver, or kidney) may be candidates for radiologic procedures, such as angioembolization or stenting, but some of these patients are best served by immediate laparotomy. Selected patients with penetrating injuries may also be candidates for the nonoperative approach, but further research in this area is needed before this approach can be widely embraced. As we approach the year 2000, the nonoperative approach to hepatic, splenic, and renal injuries will continue to have a major role in the treatment of trauma patients. Currently, the morbidity and mortality rates of nonoperative management are acceptably low, but surgeons still must monitor their results carefully as they apply these methods more liberally among injured patients.     

Eleven Years of Liver Trauma: The Scottish Experience

The aim of this population based study was to assess the incidence, mechanisms, management, and outcome of patients who sustained hepatic trauma in Scotland (population 5 million) over the period 1992–2002. The Scottish Trauma Audit Group database was searched for details of any patient with liver trauma. Data on identified patients were analyzed for demographic information, mechanisms of injury, associated injuries, hemodynamic stability on presentation, management, and outcome. A total of 783 patients were identified as having sustained liver trauma. The male-to-female ratio was 3:1 with a median age of 31 years. Blunt trauma (especially road traffic accidents) accounted for 69% of injuries. Liver trauma was associated with injuries to the chest, head, and abdominal injuries other than liver injury; most commonly spleen and kidneys. In all, 166 patients died in the emergency department, and a further 164 died in hospital. The mortality rate was higher in patients with increasing age (p < 0.001), hemodynamic instability (p < 0.001), blunt trauma (p < 0.001), and increasing severity of liver injury (p < 0.001). The incidence of liver trauma in Scotland is low, but it accounts for significant mortality. Associated injuries were common. Outcome was worse in patients with advanced age, blunt trauma, multiple injuries and those requiring an immediate laparotomy.     

Comparison of hepatic abscess after operative and nonoperative management of isolated blunt liver trauma

Hepatic abscess has been well recognized as a complication after blunt hepatic injuries. The clinical presentation of hepatic abscess after the operative and nonoperative management of isolated blunt liver injury is compared in this study. From 1995 to 2000, 674 patients with blunt liver injury were admitted and were managed either operatively or nonoperatively. Hepatic abscess occurred in 21 of these patients. Six of the 21 patients had their liver injuries managed nonoperatively (group 1) and the remaining 15 had their liver injuries managed operatively (group 2). The severity of injury of both groups of patients was similar, but group 2 patients required more blood transfusion and had a higher incidence of abscess formation. The formation of abscess occurred within 12 days after admission in the group 1 patients but ranged from 5 days to 6 years in the group 2 patients. One of the group 1 and eight of the group 2 patients had recurrent abscesses and required repeated admission. The nonoperative management of blunt hepatic trauma had a better outcome than the operative approach in terms of a significant decrease in abdominal infections and tended to result in complete recovery without the need of repeated admission and drainage.