熊去氧胆酸及其联合激素和免疫抑制剂治疗原发性胆汁性肝硬化的临床观察

目的 观察熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)、UDCA联合泼尼松龙、UDCA联合硫唑嘌呤3种方案治疗对原发性胆汁性肝硬化(PBC)的疗效,并评价影响疗效的危险因素.方法 82例初诊PBC患者随机分为单用UDCA(U组,28例)、UDCA联合泼尼松龙(UP组,27例)、UDCA联合硫唑嘌呤(UA组,27例)3个治疗组,在治疗第0、3、6、12个月采集临床、实验室资料及药物不良反应.主要采用重复测量的方差分析和COX回归进行统计学处理.结果 UP组患者较U组及UA组在乏力和瘙痒程度上有明显改善(P=0.015和P=0.037),U组、UA组无改善.3组患者治疗后丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)、天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)、谷氨酰转肽酶(GGT)、总胆红素、直接胆红素(DBIL)和IgM均下降,组内比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05),3组间比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).发生疾病进展的患者Mayo危险性评分高(P=0.018)、凝血酶原时间(PT)延长(P=0.042).UP组血糖升高2例、满月脸5例、多毛1例;UA组白细胞下降2例,胆绞痛1例,U组未出现药物不良反应.ALP、GGT、总胆固醇基线水平高是生化缓解的危险因素(P=0.015).总胆红素、DBIL、总胆汁酸增高、PT延长不利于肝生化缓解(P=0.075).结论 3种方案对PBC患者肝脏生化指标、IgM的改善作用相近,UDCA联合泼尼松龙方案可减轻乏力、瘙痒症状,单用UDCA方案不良反应发生率最低.Mayo危险性评分高、PT延长的患者疾病易进展;高水平的ALP、GGT、总胆固醇是生化缓解的危险因素;高水平的总胆红素、DBIL、总胆汁酸、PT不利于生化缓解.

Abstract：

Objective The aims of this study were to compare the clinical and laboratory responses to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) monotherapy with the combination therapy of UDCA plus prednisolone/azathioprine in primary biliary cirrhosis(PBC),and to investigate the risk factors affecting the therapeutic responses.Methods Eighty-two patients with untreated PBC were divided randomly into three groups.Group U (28 patients) received UDCA alone,group UP(27 patients) received UDCA and pr ednisolone,while group UA (27 patients ) received UDCA and azathioprine.The clinical and laboratory data were recorded after treated for 3,6 and 12 months.Repeated measures ANOVA and COX regression model were used for statistical analysis.Results Fatigue and pruritus were improved only in group UP(P=0.015 and P=0.037 respectively).Alanine aminotransferase(ALT),aspartate aminotransferase(AST),alkaline phosphatase(ALP),gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT),total bilirubin (TBIL),direct bilirubin (DBIL) and IgM in the 3 groups were decreased (P＜0.05),while there was no statistical significant difference between the three groups (P＞0.05).The patients with disease progression had higher Mayo risk score (MRS) (P=0.018) and prolonged prothrombin time (PT)(P=0.042).In group UP,side-effect associated with glucocorticosteroids occurred in eight patients while there was no side-effect in group U.High baseline levels of ALP、GGT and CHO were risk factors for biochemical remission(P=0.015).The increase of DBIL,TBIL,total bile acid(TBA) and PT did not contribute to the prediction of biochemical remission ( P=0.075 ).Conclusion There are no differences among the three groups in the improvement of hepatic biochemical data and IgM.The combination therapy of UDCA with prednisolone could relieve fatigue and itching.The disease of patients with higher Mayo risk score and prolonged PT tend to progress.High baseline levels of ALP,GGT and CHO are risk factors for biochemical remission.High baseline levels of TBIL,DBIL,TBA and PT could not predict biochemical remission.The incidence of adverse effect is lowest when treated with UDCA alone.     

Mycophenolate mofetil for the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis in patients with an incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Despite evidence for therapeutic efficacy with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), only 30-50% of patients achieve complete biochemical remission within 1 year of therapy. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressive medication that inhibits T and B lymphocyte proliferation. The aim of this investigation was to determine the safety and estimated efficacy of MMF in patients with PBC. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with incomplete responses to UDCA (defined as persistent elevation of serum alkaline phosphatase > or =2 times the upper limit of normal) received MMF 1 g daily to a maximum of 3 g daily with UDCA (13-15 mg/kg per day) for 1 year. Liver biochemistries were determined at 3-month intervals with Mayo Risk Score calculated at baseline and end of therapy. RESULTS: Nineteen (76%) patients completed 1 year of therapy. Despite improvements in serum alkaline phosphatase (920 +/- 308 vs. 709 +/- 242 IU/L, P = 0.001) and AST (65 +/- 31 vs. 51 +/- 19 IU/L, P = 0.007) levels, these findings were clinically insignificant. Exploratory analysis revealed a strong correlation between advanced PBC defined by higher Mayo Risk Score and reduction in serum alkaline phosphatase levels (r = -0.74, P = 0.006). Six patients (24%) did not complete therapy; adverse drug events were responsible for study withdrawal in 3 individuals. Adverse reactions that resolved spontaneously or by dose reduction occurred in 13 patients. CONCLUSIONS: MMF is not associated with important clinical benefits in PBC based on the results of this pilot investigation.     

Utilization of the Mayo risk score in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis receiving ursodeoxycholic acid

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is an effective therapy for most patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). During the management of these treated patients, a number of clinically important issues arose including which patients might be candidates for combined therapy, which patients require endoscopy for variceal bleeding, and how survival can be predicted during treatment. Our aims were: 1) to identify factors associated with a suboptimal response to UDCA in patients with PBC; 2) to define a simple, non-invasive method to predict those PBC patients most apt to have esophageal varices; and 3) to determine the reliability of the Mayo survival model in predicting the course of UDCA treated patients. METHODS: We analyzed the prospectively collected data of 180 patients, who we continue to follow, with PBC who participated in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of UDCA. RESULTS: After six months of UDCA therapy, patients with serum alkaline phosphatase levels less than twice normal (p < 0.04), and/or a Mayo risk score < 4.5 (p < 0.04) were more likely to respond favorably to treatment over a two year period. The Mayo risk score was the single risk factor independently predictive of development of varices (p < 0.01); 93% of patients who developed varices had a Mayo risk score > or = 4. The Mayo survival model, recalculated after 6 months on UDCA therapy accurately predicted patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: Suboptimal responders to UDCA can be identified by assessment of serum alkaline phosphatase levels, and/or Mayo risk score. A Mayo risk score above 4 helps in selecting patients for endoscopic surveillance for varices and the Mayo survival model accurately predicts the clinical course in patients with PBC receiving UDCA.     

Oral budesonide in the treatment of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis with a suboptimal response to ursodeoxycholic acid

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is a safe and effective medical therapy for most patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). However, some patients show an incomplete response to UDCA therapy. Treatment with corticosteroids may be of benefit although at the expense of systemic side effects. Budesonide, a corticosteroid with an extensive first-pass hepatic metabolism appeared promising for the treatment of PBC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and estimate the efficacy of budesonide in patients with PBC, who have shown a suboptimal response to UDCA. Twenty-two patients with PBC, 16 women, median age of 50 who had been on UDCA (13-15 mg/kg/d) for a mean of 46 months (range 6-108 months) and had shown a persistent elevation of alkaline phosphatase activity at least 2 times the upper limit of normal were enrolled. Oral budesonide, 9 mg daily was administered for 1 year and patients continued on the same dosage of UDCA. There was a significant, but transitory improvement in serum levels of total bilirubin (P =.001) and a significant, but marginal improvement in serum alkaline phsophatase (P =.001) with combination therapy. The Mayo risk score increased significantly (P =.02) and there was a significant loss of bone mass (P <.001) of the lumbar spine. Budesonide-induced hyperglycemia and cosmetic adverse effects were noted in 2 patients. In conclusion, oral budesonide appears to add minimal, if any, additional benefit to UDCA, and it is associated with a significant worsening of osteoporosis in patients with PBC.     

Excellent long-term survival in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and biochemical response to ursodeoxycholic Acid

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Because the efficacy of UDCA on long-term outcome of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) has not been completely elucidated, we have assessed the course and survival of patients with PBC treated with UDCA and compared with the survival predicted by the Mayo model and the estimated survival of a standardized population. METHODS: (One hundred ninety-two patients [181 women] with PBC treated with UDCA [15 mg/kg per day] for 1.5-14 years.) Response to treatment was defined by an alkaline phosphatase decrease greater than 40% of baseline values or normal levels after 1 year of treatment. The predicted survival was obtained by the Mayo model and the estimated survival was taken from the standardized matched Spanish population. RESULTS: Seventeen patients died or fulfilled criteria for liver transplantation (8.9%). The observed survival was higher than that predicted by the Mayo model and lower than that of the control population (P < .001). One hundred seventeen patients (61%) responded to treatment. The survival of responders was significantly higher than that predicted by the Mayo model and similar to that estimated for the control population (P = .15). By contrast, the survival of patients without biochemical response was lower than that estimated for the Spanish population (P < .001) although higher than that predicted by the Mayo model. CONCLUSIONS: Biochemical response to UDCA after 1 year is associated with a similar survival to the matched control population, clearly supporting the favorable effects of this treatment in PBC. The suboptimal survival of nonresponders identifies the group for further treatments.     

Silymarin in the treatment of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis with a suboptimal response to ursodeoxycholic acid

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is a safe and effective medical therapy for most patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), but some patients show an incomplete response. Silymarin is a potent antioxidant with immunomodulatory and antifibrotic properties. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and assess the efficacy of silymarin in patients with PBC who had shown a suboptimal response to UDCA. Twenty-seven patients with PBC who had been on UDCA (13-15 mg/kg/day) therapy for 7 to 221 months and had shown a persistent elevation of alkaline phosphatase activity at least 2 times the upper limit of normal for more than 6 months were enrolled. Oral silymarin, 140 mg 3 times daily was given for 1 year, and patients continued on the same dosage of UDCA. No significant changes in serum alkaline phosphatase activity (897 +/- 84 vs. 876 +/- 95, P =.5), total bilirubin (0.9 +/- 0.1 vs. 1 +/- 0.1, P =.07), aspartate transaminase (AST) (58 +/- 5 vs. 56 +/- 6, P =.4), albumin (4.0 +/-.06 vs. 4.1 +/-.06, P =.4), or Mayo risk score (3.82 +/- 0.2 vs. 3.88 +/- 0.2, P =.4) were noted after 1 year of treatment with combination therapy. Transitory gastrointestinal adverse events occurred in 2 patients. In conclusion, although silymarin was well tolerated, this medication did not provide benefit to patients with PBC responding suboptimally to UDCA. The results of this pilot study would seem to discourage further controlled trials of silymarin in patients with PBC.     

Additive improvement induced by bezafibrate in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis showing refractory response to ursodeoxycholic acid

Background and Aim: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has been widely used in the treatment of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). However, some patients are refractory to UDCA. The aim of this study is to clarify the additive improvement induced by bezafibrate in patients refractory to UDCA. Methods: This study was a prospective analysis of 37 consecutive PBC patients. All patients were treated first for 6 months with UDCA, and then with bezafibrate, if their alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels did not decrease more than 40% or within the normal range after 6 months' treatment with UDCA. Clinical parameters were monitored for the subsequent 24 months. Result: Twenty‐two patients (59%) achieved improvement of ALP levels after the treatment with UDCA. Those patients (Group A) had significantly lower levels of ALP at diagnosis than those with abnormal ALP levels after 6 months' treatment with UDCA (Group B; P = 0.020). They continued UDCA monotherapy, and maintained normal ALP levels at subsequent follow ups. However, immunoglobulin M (IgM) levels remained abnormal in eight patients, whose IgM levels at the time of diagnosis were significantly higher than those whose IgM were normalized after 6 months' treatment with UDCA (P = 0.026). Those in Group B were treated additionally with bezafibrate, and 12 patients (80%) achieved normal ALP and IgM levels within 12 months of commencement of therapy. Conclusion: Higher ALP level at diagnosis is one of the predictors for UDCA failure. Combination treatment of bezafibrate in addition to UDCA may be an effective treatment for PBC patients refractory to UDCA.     

Moexipril for Treatment of Primary Biliary Cirrhosis in Patients with an Incomplete Response to Ursodeoxycholic Acid

Blockade of angiotensin II synthesis attenuates hepatic fibrosis in different experimental models of chronic liver injury. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of moexipril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) who have had a suboptimal response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). Twenty PBC patients on UDCA (13–15 mg/kg/day) therapy with an elevation of serum alkaline phosphatase at least twice the upper limit of normal were treated with oral moexipril 15 mg/day for one year. No significant changes in serum alkaline phosphatase (379 ± 32 vs. 379 ± 51), bilirubin (0.8 ± 0.1 vs. 0.9 ± 0.1), aspartate aminotransferase (60 ± 8 vs. 63 ± 9), and Mayo risk score (3.55 ± 0.2 vs. 3.62 ± 0.2) was associated with the treatment. Fatigue and health-related quality of life scores during treatment demonstrated a trend toward improvement. Moexipril was not clinically beneficial to PBC patients responding suboptimally to UDCA.     

Long-term ursodeoxycholic acid delays histological progression in primary biliary cirrhosis

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is a progressive cholestatic liver disease frequently leading to development of cirrhosis and its complications. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is a beneficial medical therapy for patients with PBC. Improvement in some histological features, but not in histological stage, has been reported after 2 years of UDCA therapy. Thus, longer follow-up may be necessary to determine whether UDCA has a favorable effect on histological stage of disease and progression to cirrhosis. Our aim was to determine the long-term effects of UDCA therapy on histological stage and progression to cirrhosis in patients with PBC. Sixteen unselected patients with noncirrhotic PBC who had been on long-term UDCA therapy (13-15 mg/kg/d) for 6.6 +/- 0.4 years (range, 5-9 years) were identified and their histological finding during treatment compared with that of 51 noncirrhotic patients with PBC who had received ineffective therapy (D-penicillamine [DPCA] or placebo) for 5.6 +/- 0.07 years (range, 5-8 years). Histological stage was determined using the Ludwig classification. The rate of progression to cirrhosis (stage 4) was significantly less in the UDCA group than in the control group (13% vs. 49%; P =.009). Although the overall rate of progression of histological stage was less in the UDCA group than in the control group (50% vs. 71%), this difference was not significant (P =.1). A marked improvement in liver biochemistries and Mayo risk score was noted in all patients during UDCA therapy; however, this improvement was not significantly different between patients who progressed and those who did not. In conclusion, long-term UDCA therapy appeared to delay the development of cirrhosis in PBC.     

Ursodeoxycholic acid in the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis: A short-term, randomized, double-blind controlled, cross-over study with long-term follow up

Abstract In order to evaluate the efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in the treatment of Chinese patients with primary biliary cirrhosis, a short-term, randomized, double-blind controlled, cross-over study was done with long-term follow up. In the first part of the study, 12 patients were randomly chosen to receive either UDCA 600 mg/day for 3 months followed by a placebo for 3 months or a placebo for 3 months followed by UDCA for 3 months. The clinical symptoms of pruritus improved when the patients were receiving UDCA but became worse when receiving a placebo. Mean serum levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALPase), γ-glutamyl transferase (γ-GT), total bilirubin, cholesterol, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase all decreased below the baseline values when receiving UDCA treatment and all increased above the baseline values when receiving the placebo. The difference was statistically significant. In the second part of the study, 19 patients received long-term UDCA treatment (mean 20 months). The clinical symptoms of pruritus improved in 90% of the pruritic patients. Serum levels of ALPase, γ-GT and ALT fell significantly from the pretreatment values 6, 12 and from the mean 20 months after UDCA treatment. Serum levels of total bilirubin fell significantly 6 and 12 months after UDCA treatment but did not reach statistical significance at the last follow up. No patient lost antimitochondrial antibody and elevated immunoglobulin levels did not improve significantly, but the Mayo clinical risk score improved significantly after long-term UDCA treatment. Treatment failure was noted in three patients: two patients in the histologic stage IV with clinical overt jaundice died of complications 4 and 5 months after UDCA treatment, respectively; another patient underwent a liver transplantation 1 year after the UDCA treatment due to progressive jaundice. No severe adverse reaction was noted during UDCA treatment, only one patient suffered from a mild allergic reaction. In conclusion, UDCA is safe and effective in the treatment of Chinese PBC patients in stages I—III.     

Relationship between biliary and serum bile acids and response to ursodeoxycholic acid in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis

Objective: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) improves liver biochemistries and enriches the bile with UDCA in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to determine whether the degree of enrichment of bile correlated with that of serum and whether either of these measures correlated with improvement in measures of liver disease.
Methods: In a randomized study, biliary and serum bile acid analyses were performed at entry and after 2 yr of UDCA or placebo.
Results: The percentage of ursodeoxycholic acid in bile increased by 42% in the UDCA group ( n = 61 ) compared with 8% in the placebo group ( n = 57 ) ( p < 0.0001 ). Measurement of serum bile acids in 32 patients (18 ursodeoxycholic acid, 14 placebo) indicated that at 2 yr, ursodeoxycholic acid comprised 65% of serum bile acids in the treated group and 7% in the placebo group. Agreement between bile and serum was fair ( r = 0.75 , p ≤ 0.00002 ) because in some patients, plasma but not biliary bile acids were enriched with UDCA. Changes in biliary ursodeoxycholic acid correlated significantly but weakly with the changes in serum alkaline phosphatase, AST, bilirubin, and in Mayo risk score. Correlations between changes in serum bile acid composition and biochemical measures of disease activity were even weaker.
Conclusion: The measurement of biliary bile acids is superior to that of serum bile acids for assessing the compliance and changes in the circulating bile acids in patients receiving ursodeoxycholic acid for the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis. Furthermore, measures to further increase the proportion of ursodeoxycholic acid in circulating bile acids should be explored.     

Ursodeoxycholic acid treatment of refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease of the liver.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid treatment in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) of the liver. DESIGN: Open-label study in which each patient served as his or her own control. SETTING: Private practice and a university bone marrow transplant center. PATIENTS: Twelve patients with refractory chronic GVHD of the liver were studied after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. INTERVENTIONS: After baseline data collection, patients were given ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA, 10 to 15 mg/kg body weight per day) for 6 weeks. After discontinuation of the drug, patients were followed for an additional 6 weeks. Doses of immunosuppressive drugs were unchanged for these 12 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: Signs, symptoms, Karnofsky performance scores, hematocrit, total leukocyte count, absolute neutrophil count, platelet count, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), total serum bilirubin, prothrombin time, serum creatinine, and blood urea nitrogen were assessed. RESULTS: Serum tests of cholestatic liver injury measured at 2, 4, and 6 weeks showed improvement compared with baseline. At 6 weeks, the percent decrease from baseline in total serum bilirubin was 33% (P less than 0.005); in alkaline phosphatase the decrease was 32% (P less than 0.038); and in AST the decrease was 37% (P less than 0.007). After discontinuation of UDCA therapy, 11 patients were followed for 6 additional weeks. All showed significant worsening in liver function test results. Symptom scores were unchanged throughout the study. One patient with pruritus improved while receiving therapy with UDCA. No adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSION: Therapy with UDCA was safe, well-tolerated, and efficacious in the short-term treatment of refractory chronic GVHD of the liver. Further investigation is needed to evaluate the long-term effects of UDCA therapy.     

熊去氧胆酸治疗不同临床分期原发性胆汁性肝硬化的2年随访观察

目的 观察熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)对不同临床分期原发性胆汁性肝硬化(PBC)患者的长期疗效.方法 91例PBC患者通过自身对照的方法随访观察2年,观察应用UDCA治疗的2年内不同阶段症状、生化学指标及肝组织学病理变化.计数资料以例数或百分比描述,用配对计数资料的x2检验及重复测量数据的方差分析等方法进行统计学分析.结果 Ⅱ期患者完成治疗后6个月,碱性磷酸酶(ALP)及γ-谷氨酰转肽酶(GGT)水平下降51.9%和67.3%;治疗1年,其生化学应答率为81.25%(巴黎标准)和93.75%(巴塞罗那标准);治疗2年,ALP及GGT下降65.33%和86.75%,IgM水平于治疗1年后由62.5%降至正常;Ⅲ期患者治疗后6个月,ALP及GGT水平下降48.8%和46.6%,治疗1年生化学应答率为36.84%(巴黎标准)和57.89%(巴塞罗那标准),治疗2年ALP及GGT下降76.16%和78.63%,IgM水平于治疗1年后由28.9%降至正常,乏力、黄疸及瘙痒症状有所好转;Ⅳ期患者治疗后6个月,ALP及GGT下降43.65%和33.39%,治疗1年,生化学应答率为30.43%(巴黎标准)和56.52%(巴塞罗那标准),治疗2年,ALP及GGT下降56.84%和53.06%;IgM水平于治疗1年后,17.4%降至正常,黄疸及瘙痒症状也有所好转.11例不同分期PBC患者于治疗前后行肝活组织检查,其中Ⅰ期和Ⅱ期PBC肝脏组织学基本恢复,Ⅲ期及Ⅳ期PBC可见病理学进展,但炎症细胞浸润减轻.结论 UDCA治疗临床Ⅱ期～Ⅳ期的PBC均出现良好的生化学应答,以Ⅱ期应答率最高,并且可改善PBC患者临床症状.对于Ⅰ～Ⅱ期的患者,UDCA治疗可使肝脏组织学恢复,Ⅲ～Ⅳ期患者治疗后虽可见病理学进展,但其炎症细胞浸润明显减轻.提示早期诊断、早期治疗,应用UDCA长期治疗是治疗该病的关键.     

Rifampin is safe for treatment of pruritus due to chronic cholestasis: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized-controlled trials.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety and efficacy of rifampin for treatment of pruritus associated with cholestasis due to chronic liver disease. METHODS: Medical literature was searched systematically using keywords as rifampicin, rifampin, rifamycin, cholestasis, pruritus, itching, and liver disease. Trials that compared the efficacy of rifampin with placebo/alternative for treatment of pruritus due to chronic cholestasis were selected for analysis. Primary outcomes were resolution of pruritus and development of side effects. Association was measured with the odds ratio (OR). Breslow-Day method was used to treat for homogeneity under null hypothesis that OR was consistent across all the trials. Corrected Mantel-Haenszel chi(2) test was used to test if OR differed systematically from value of 1. RESULTS: Five prospective randomized-controlled cross-over trials with 61 patients were identified. Treatment with rifampin led to complete or partial resolution of pruritus in 47 (77%) patients as compared with 12(20%) treated with placebo or alternative (OR 15.2, 95% confidence interval 5.2-45.6, P=0.001). Four (7%) patients treated with rifampin suffered side effects, which resolved after its discontinuation. There was no incidence of hepatotoxicity. Test of heterogeneity for primary end points among the trials was not significant (P=0.16). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that rifampin is safe and effective for treatment of pruritus due to chronic cholestasis. This analysis also suggests that use of rifampin for short duration is associated with a low risk of hepatotoxicity.     

The effect of ursodeoxycholic acid therapy on the natural course of primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We used a multistate modeling approach to assess the effect of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) therapy on the natural course of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), which remains controversial. METHODS: Our population included 262 patients with PBC who had received 13-15 mg/kg UDCA daily for a mean of 8 years (range, 1-22 years). Data were analyzed using a multistate Markov model, with histologic stage progression, death, and orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) as main end points. Survival without OLT was compared with that predicted by the updated Mayo model and with the expected survival in the control population. RESULTS: Forty-five patients developed cirrhosis, 20 underwent OLT, and 16 died by the censor date. Ten deaths were due to liver disease. The overall survival rates were 92% at 10 years and 82% at 20 years. Survival rates without OLT were 84% and 66% at 10 and 20 years, respectively, which were slightly lower than the survival rate of an age- and sex-matched control population (relative risk [RR], 1.4; P = .1) but better than the spontaneous survival rate as predicted by the updated Mayo model (RR, .5; P < .01). The survival rate of patients in stage 1 and 2 was similar to that in the control population (RR, .8; P = .5), whereas the probability of death or OLT remained significantly increased in treated patients in late histologic stages (RR, 2.2; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with UDCA alone normalizes the survival rate of patients with PBC when given at early stages. However, there is a continued need for new therapeutic options in patients with advanced disease.     

Apolipoprotein E polymorphism, a marker of disease severity in primary biliary cirrhosis?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To determine whether the apolipoprotein E (apo-E) polymorphism is associated with the risk of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), the severity of the disease and its response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) therapy. METHODS: The apo-E genotype was determined in 72 PBC patients. Genotype and allele distributions were compared with those found in the French general population. Laboratory parameters obtained before and after 1- and 4-year UDCA treatment were compared according to the apo-E allele carrier status. RESULTS: Apo-E allele and genotype distributions were similar between PBC patients and the general population. At the time of diagnosis, the epsilon4 allele carriers were younger (P < 0.05), had higher bilirubin (P < 0.05) and IgG (P < 0.001) levels and a lower prothrombin index (P < 0.01) than epsilon2 (homozygous + heterozygous) or epsilon3 homozygous allele carriers. After 4-year UDCA therapy, the decrease in serum alkaline phosphatase and in alanine and aspartate aminotransferase activities was lower in percentage in the epsilon4 than in other epsilon allele carriers (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Although apo-E polymorphism does not appear to confer susceptibility to PBC, it probably influences PBC progression and response to UDCA. The epsilon4 allele may identify patients with high risk of severe disease and poor response to treatment.     

Predicting outcome in primary biliary cirrhosis

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is a slowly progressive autoimmune liver disease that may ultimately result in liver failure and premature death. Predicting outcome is of key importance in clinical management and an essential requirement for patients counselling and timing of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. The following factors are associated with progressive disease and worse outcome: young age at diagnosis, male gender, histological presence of cirrhosis, accelerated marked ductopenia in relation to the amount of fibrosis, high serum bilirubin, low serum albumin levels, high serum alkaline phosphatase levels, esophageal varices, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and lack of biochemical response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). The prognostic significance of symptoms at diagnosis is uncertain. UDCA therapy and liver transplantation have a significant beneficial effect on the outcome of the disease. The Mayo risk score in PBC can be used for estimating individual prognosis. The Newcastle Varices in PBC Score may be a useful clinical tool to predict the risk for development of esophageal varices. Male gender, cirrhosis and non-response to UDCA therapy in particular, are risk factors for development of HCC.     

不同方案治疗原发性胆汁性肝硬化合并干燥综合征的临床研究

 目的 观察不同方案治疗原发性胆汁性肝硬化（PBC）合并干燥综合征（SS）的疗效。方法 选PBC合并SS患者79例,分为3组:单用熊去氧胆酸组（U组,29例）、熊去氧胆酸+泼尼松龙组（UP组,37例）、熊去氧胆酸+硫唑嘌呤组（UA组,13例）,观察不同治疗方案的疗效。 结果3种方案对PBC合并SS患者的乏力、瘙痒均有明显改善,但组间比较差异无统计学意义（P值均＞0.05）;3种方案治疗后ALT、AST、碱性磷酸酶（ALP）、γ-谷氨酰转移酶、TBil、DBil、IgG、IgM均有明显下降,组内比较差异有统计学意义（P值均＜0.05）,但组间比较差异无统计学意义（P值均＞0.05）。结论 PBC合并SS以肝脏受累为主要表现时应以治疗PBC为主,熊去氧胆酸联合糖皮质激素或硫唑嘌呤治疗未发现优于单用熊去氧胆酸。     

High-dose ursodeoxycholic acid as a therapy for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis

OBJECTIVES: To assess the tolerability and efficacy of high-dose (25-30 mg/kg per day) ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). METHODS: Thirty patients with PSC were enrolled in this pilot study and treated for 1 yr. Changes in the Mayo risk score at 1 yr of treatment and projected survival at 4 yr were compared with that observed in patients randomized to placebo (n = 52) or UDCA (n = 53) at a dose of 13-15 mg/kg per day. RESULTS: A marked improvement in serum alkaline phosphatase activity (1265+/-172 vs 693+/-110 U/L, p < 0.001), AST (161+/-037 vs 77+/-13 U/L, p = 0.001), albumin (4.0+/-0.1 vs 4.2+/-0.1 g/dl, p = 0.03), and total bilirubin (1.6+/-0.3 vs 1.3+/-0.2 mg/dl, p = 0.1) occurred at 1 yr of therapy with high-dose UDCA. Changes in the Mayo risk score after 1 yr of treatment were significantly different among the three groups (p < 0.001), and these changes would be translated into a significantly different expected survival at 4 yr (p = 0.05). This expected survival at 4 yr was significantly different between placebo and the dose of 25-30 mg/kg per day (p = 0.04), but not between placebo and the dose of 13-15 mg/kg per day (p = 0.4). High-dose UDCA was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: UDCA at a dose of 25-30 mg/kg per day may be of benefit for patients with PSC, and this regimen deserves further evaluation in a long-term, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.     

Overlap syndrome of primary biliary cirrhosis and autoimmune hepatitis: a retrospective study of 115 cases of autoimmune liver disease

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare clinical, biological, and histological features and treatment response in 115 patients with overlap syndrome (OS), autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) or primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). METHODS: Consecutive patients with AIH, PBC or OS followed between 1984 and 2005 in five different centers were included. All data were re-evaluated using current diagnostic criteria of each disease. RESULTS: Fifteen patients had OS (13 females), 48 AIH (40 females) and 52 PBC (49 females). Patients with OS were significantly younger than patients with PBC (median age: 44 vs 59 years). Jaundice (20%) and pruritus (20%) were the main initial symptoms in OS. Patients with OS had serum transaminase and gammaglobulin levels significantly higher than patients with PBC; serum alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyl-transpeptidase and IgM levels were significantly higher in OS than in patients with AIH. Histological analysis showed moderate or severe piecemeal necrosis in 86% and destructive cholangitis in 93% in OS group. Among 11 patients with OS treated with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) or immunosuppressors alone, only 6 had a complete biochemical response. In contrast, all patients with OS receiving combined therapy, as first or second line, responded, 5 patients to the combination corticosteroids-azathioprine-UDCA and 2 to the combination cyclosporine-UDCA. CONCLUSION: OS is not rare and accounts for 13.9% of patients with autoimmune liver disease in our series. Combination of immunosuppressors and UDCA appears the most efficient treatment in these patients.