Immediate autologous breast reconstruction using muscle-sparing TRAM flaps with superficial epigastric system turbocharging: a salvage option

Current breast reconstruction trends favor the use of muscle-sparing abdominal flaps to minimize abdominal morbidity. When compared to the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap, the muscle-sparing deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap and the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap are common options that minimize donor-site morbidity. For patients with inadequate flap perfusion via either system, alternative surgical options that permit preservation of the abdominal musculature are limited. Using both the DIEP and SIEA systems, the authors describe a turbocharged construct that also facilitates flap perfusion without the need for violation of the anterior rectus sheath. This turbocharged system can provide adequate blood supply in a flap with questionable DIEP or SIEA perfusion alone.     

Upper extremity reconstruction using free SCIA/SIEA flap

The most suitable free flap alternative in upper extremity reconstruction has adequate and quality of tissue with consistent vascular pedicle. Free flap must provide convenient tissue texture to reconstruct aesthetic and functional units of upper extremity. Furthermore, minimal donor site morbidity is preferred features in free flap election. In our efforts to obtain the best possible outcome for patients, we chose, as a first priority, the free superficial circumflex inferior artery (SCIA)/superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap over other free flap options for the soft‐tissue reconstruction of upper extremities. The authors retrospectively report the results of 20 free SCIA/SIEA flaps for upper extremity reconstruction during the past 3 years. Nineteen of 20 flaps were successful (95%): three required emergent postoperative reexploration of the anastomosis and one failed. Flap thinning (n = 4) was performed during the flap harvest, whereas some flaps were thinned with secondary debulking (n = 4). The functional and aesthetic results were evaluated as acceptable by all patients. Based on our results, a free SCIA/SIEA flap has the following advantages in soft‐tissue reconstruction of the upper extremity: (1) if necessary, flap thinning may be performed safely at the time of flap elevation and (2) flaps are harvested using a lower abdominal incision so that it causes minimal donor site scar. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. Microsurgery, 2010.     

Rethinking the superficial inferior epigastric artery flap in breast reconstruction: Video demonstration of a rapid,reliable harvest technique

Abdominal-based autologous free tissue breast reconstruction has undergone significant changes over the past decade. The evolution has focused on limiting morbidity of the donor site. The transition from the transverse rectus abdominus muscle free flap to the muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominus muscle free flap to the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator free flap has markedly improved abdominal-based autologous breast reconstruction. However, all of these flaps involve an incision through the anterior rectus fascia and potential damage of intercostal motor and sensory nerves. The superficial inferior epigastric artery flap (SIEA) reliably perfuses the ipsilateral hemiabdomen, yet does not violate the fascia or any motor nerves. As a result, the incidence of hernia, abdominal wall weakness and bulging is essentially eliminated. Nevertheless, use of the SIEA flap remains marginal. Vessel size, dissection difficulties and lack of understanding of the relevant anatomy have limited its acceptance. The present article describes a rapid, reliable and safe dissection technique with an algorithm for harvesting the SIEA flap in autologous breast reconstruction.     

Sensate superficial inferior epigastric artery flap innervated by the iliohypogastric nerve for reconstruction of a finger soft tissue defect

In the era of perforator flaps, lower‐abdominal/inguinal perforator flaps such as superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap and superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) perforator flap are becoming popular with its longer vascular pedicle and usefulness in various reconstructions. SIEA flap's region is innervated by the T12 nerve and the iliohypogastric nerve (IHN), but no sensate SIEA flap has been reported so far. In this report, we present a case in which a sensate SIEA flap innervated by the IHN was used for reconstruction of a finger soft tissue defect. A 55‐year‐old male suffering from the volar skin necrosis of the right ring finger underwent the volar soft tissue reconstruction using a free sensate SIEA flap because of hypoplastic SCIA. The SIEA flap included the IHN anterior branch, and neuroraphy was performed between the IHN and the third common digital nerve in an end‐to‐side manner after vascular anastomoses. The reconstructed volar skin could sensate 14 weeks after the surgery. At postoperative 6 months, Semmes‐Weinstein test and moving 2‐point discrimination revealed 3.64 and 8 mm in the proximal portion of the SIEA flap where the IHN was supposed to innervate. The IHN may be included in a SIEA flap, and a sensate SIEA flap may be a useful option when a SCIP flap is not available. Further anatomical and clinical studies are required to clarify anatomy and clinical usefulness of the IHN. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 35:324–327, 2015.     

Preoperative computed tomography angiogram to predict patients with favorable anatomy for superficial inferior epigastric artery flap breast reconstruction

Superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap breast reconstruction has advantages over deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) and muscle sparing transverse rectus abdominus myocutaneous flap (TRAM) reconstructions with less donor site morbidity and less complicated flap dissection. Not all patients have an adequate SIEA and superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV) to support free tissue breast reconstruction, and dissection of the SIEA in all patients can be time consuming. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) angiograms can be used to identify the SIEA and SIEV in patients planning to undergo free abdominal tissue breast reconstruction and direct more efficient dissection in patients with a large SIEA. Retrospective analysis of free abdominal tissue flap breast reconstruction from a single plastic surgeon was performed. All patients undergoing free abdominal tissue breast reconstruction had a preoperative CT angiogram using a protocol for the evaluation of the abdominal wall perforating arteries. CT scans were reviewed by the surgeon preoperatively and evaluated for the presence, caliber, and image quality of the SIEA and SIEV. All patients, regardless of CT angiogram findings, had operative dissection and evaluation of the SIEA and SIEV. A total of 177 free flaps were performed on 113 patients who underwent preoperative CT angiogram and free abdominal tissue breast reconstruction. Of them, 64 patients had bilateral breast reconstruction. Twelve SIEA flaps (10.6%) were performed on 12 patients. During preoperative CT angiographic evaluation, 49 patients (43%) were noted to have at least one visible SIEA, whereas only 24 of those patients (21%) were felt to have an SIEA of adequate caliber. No flaps were lost during the postoperative period. All 12 SIEA flaps performed had an adequate SIEA when observed on preoperative CT angiogram. Overall, 50% of patients found to have at least one adequate SIEA on CT angiogram had a single breast reconstructed with an SIEA flap. If the SIEA was not visualized on CT angiogram, no usable SIEA was found during surgery. Preoperative CT angiogram of the abdominal wall perforating arteries can help predict which patients may have adequate anatomy for an SIEA-based free flap. This information may help direct more efficient dissection of the abdominal flaps by selecting out patients who do not have an adequate SIEA.     

A safe approach to sparing the rectus muscle in abdominal-based microvascular breast reconstruction—TRAM, MS-TRAM, DIEP or SIEA?

There has been an international drive towards the use of abdominal-based perforator (deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) or superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA)) flaps for breast reconstruction as they provide the ideal tissue whilst minimizing donor site morbidity, post-operative pain and recovery times. Ultimately, what is desired is a safe and reliable reconstruction. We retrospectively reviewed 245 consecutive abdominal-based free flaps performed by three surgeons at a single institution between January 2002 and March 2008. Primary breast reconstructions were planned as DIEPs, but a safe, flexible approach to flap selection was adopted with the most appropriate flap performed depending on the perforator anatomy at the time of surgery. Chest wall resurfacing procedures for extensive recurrent disease, inflammatory breast carcinoma or following radionecrosis were planned as transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flaps. The incidence of flap complications was compared including total and partial flap loss, returns to operating room, seroma, abdominal hernia/bulge, fat necrosis and delayed wound healing. Patient age, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, co-morbidity and pre- and post-operative radiotherapy were recorded. Two hundred patients, mean age 48?years (range, 26–74?years), underwent a total of 245 abdominal-based microvascular breast reconstructions. Twelve salvage TRAM flaps were performed for chest wall resurfacing. Of the remaining 233 flaps, 151 (65%) were immediate and 82 (35%) were delayed reconstructions. Flaps included 171 DIEPs, 38 muscle-sparing (MS)-TRAMs, 2 TRAMs and 22 SIEA flaps. Of the 233 reconstructions, 39 flaps (16.7%) in 31 patients received radiotherapy. Mean follow-up was 2.6?years. There were three (1.3%) complete flap losses and three (1.3%) partial flap losses. Rates of fat necrosis were 3.0% and abdominal hernia/bulge 1.7%. We present an algorithm to aid decision-making in autologous breast reconstruction that reflects our safe flexible approach. We have achieved excellent success rates in autologous breast reconstruction and conclude that in order to minimize complications, a safe flexible approach towards muscle harvest must be maintained in our drive to use perforator flaps.     

Contralateral unaffected breast augmentation using zone IV as a SIEA flap during unilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction

BackgroundContralateral breast augmentation during unilateral breast reconstruction is a good option for women with small breasts. In patients with adequate lower abdominal tissues, the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is often the first choice for unilateral autologous breast reconstruction. We use Zone IV, which is usually excised owing to its insufficient blood circulation, as a superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap for contralateral breast augmentation.MethodsBetween October 2004 and January 2016, 32 patients underwent unilateral breast reconstruction using a DIEP flap and an attempted simultaneous contralateral breast augmentation with an SIEA flap. The unilateral DIEP flap attached to the contralateral SIEA flap was split into two separate flaps after indocyanine green angiography. In all patients, ipsilateral internal mammary vessels were used as recipient vessels for DIEP flap breast reconstruction. The SIEA flap pedicle was anastomosed to several branches of the deep inferior epigastric vessels. The SIEA flap was inset beneath the contralateral breast through the midline.ResultsOf 32 patients, 27 underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction and simultaneous unaffected breast augmentation using 25 SIEA or 2 superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flaps. All DIEP flaps survived, and total necrosis occurred in one SIEA flap. The mean weight of the final inset for DIEP flap reconstruction and SIEA or SCIP flap augmentation was 416 g and 112 g, respectively.ConclusionsUnilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction and contralateral SIEA flap breast augmentation may be safely performed with satisfactory results.     

Free SCIA/SIEA skin flap: a dual blood supply approach to groin region

Free groin flap donor skin is unequaled in generous skin supply and inconspicuousness. We reliably utilize this region by taking advantage of the dual blood supply from superficial circumlex iliac (SCIA) and superficial inferior epigastric (SIEA) arteries and name the flap "Free SCIA/SIEA skin flap." The arterial pedicle is selected between SCIA and SIEA according to vascular anatomy which is explored through an incision along the inguinal ligament prior to skin island planning. Among 57 free SCIA/SIEA skin flap transfers, two flap failures occurred; circulatory impairment was restored by taking the patient back to the operating room in four cases; major size discrepancy was noted in one end-to-end arterial anastomosis; and no vein grafts were required. Mostly an extended length of skin island is harvested irrespective of wound size in order to utilize the proximal skin as a vascular carrier that compensates for short pedicle. We conclude that, with the current microsurgical expertise, free SCIA/SIEA skin flap is versatile even when the skin quality is considered.     

Improving outcomes in bilateral breast reconstruction using autogenous tissue

Bilateral breast reconstruction utilizing autologous free tissue transfer is a complex procedure with multiple options for donor tissue available. This study set out to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing bilateral breast reconstruction with muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps versus those undergoing bilateral reconstructions utilizing procedures which aim to minimize abdominal donor site morbidity in the form of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) or superficial inferior epigastric (SIEA) flaps. A retrospective review identified 31 patients and 62 free flaps for bilateral autologous breast reconstruction at our teaching institutions in Rochester, NY. Patients receiving procedures which aimed to minimize donor-site morbidity experienced a shorter length of hospital stay versus those patients undergoing bilateral free TRAM procedures (P = 0.0494 by t test and P = 0.0389 by parametric test). There was no significant difference in complication rates between these 2 groups. Other demographic and premorbid factors showed no difference between groups. Here, we demonstrate that bilateral autologous breast reconstruction with flaps which minimize donor site morbidity are a safe and effective option for bilateral reconstruction. Furthermore, patients who received bilateral breast reconstruction with abdominal wall sparing techniques (DIEP or SIEA flaps) had a significantly shorter length of hospital stay, with no significant difference in complication rates when compared with patients undergoing bilateral free TRAM procedures.     

A novel model for supermicrosurgery training: the superficial inferior epigastric artery flap in rats

The purpose of this study was to determine the usefulness of a new flap model, the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap for supermicrosurgical training. Experimental groups were randomly divided into three groups of 10 rats each. In each group SIEA flaps were elevated and then returned to their original locations with or without vascular anastomosis of the superficial inferior epigastric vessels. Group 1: free SIEA flap, group 2: free SIEA flap with 1 hour ischemia time, group 3: free SIEA flap with 4 hours ischemia time, group 4: SIEA flap without vascular anastomosis. The viability rate was 80% with group 1, 50% with group 2, and 40% with group 3. All nonvascularized flaps (group 4) underwent complete necrosis. These findings suggest that preservation of blood flow in a flap has a beneficial effect on the prevention of microthrombosis in the subcutaneous capillary network of the skin and increases the flap survival rate. The SIEA flap with preserved circulation is an ideal model for developing supermicrosurgical skills.     

The efficacy of preoperative vascular mapping by MDCTA in selecting flap in abdominal flap breast reconstruction

Current methods of breast reconstruction using abdominal tissue include the transverse abdominal myocutaneous (TRAM) flap, deep inferior epigastric arterial perforator (DIEP) flap, superficial inferior epigastric arterial (SIEA) flap, and some other composite flaps. Because of the variant vascular anatomy in abdominal region, it is hard to choose an appropriate flap for a specific patient without accurate preoperative vascular mapping. This study was drawn to address the efficacy of preoperative vascular mapping by multidetector-row computed tomographic angiography (MDCTA) in selecting flap in abdominal flap breast reconstruction. A total of 34 breast reconstructions using abdominal flap from December 2006 to July 2009 were included. In all the patients included, MDCTA was performed preoperatively. Three indexes were obtained including choice of flaps, operation time, and flap complication rate. Then, these data were compared with the former data stored in the databank of our hospital from January 2004 to December 2006, before MDCTA was introduced in our center. Among the 34 patients, the flap selection was: SIEA flaps 11.8%, DIEP flaps 61.8%, TRAM flaps 11.8%, and bilateral flaps 14.7%. The correlate indexes from the data bank were as follows: SIEA flap 0; DIEP flaps 51.7%; TRAM flaps 32.8%; bilateral flaps 15.5%. p < 0.05 occurred between the comparison of SIEA, DIEP, and TRAM flap choice in the two groups. The operation time in the study group was as follows: SIEA flap (4.02 ± 0.46) hours, DIEP flap (6.23 ± 1.42) hours, TRAM flap (4.72 ± 1.53) hours, Bilateral flap (7.86 ± 1.16) hours; while the former correlate data were: DIEP (9.67 ± 1.74) hours, TRAM flap (6.64 ± 1.83) hours, bilateral flap (11.83 ± 1.35) (all the three comparison p < 0.05). The total flap complication rate was about 5.9% in the test group; while in the databank, it was 12.1% (p < 0.05). With the accurate mapping of vascular territory in abdomen by MDCTA, we could easily select a suitable abdominal flap for breast reconstruction, and we can also simplify the procedure to save operation time and make the process more safely.     

Predictive risk factors of free flap thrombosis in breast reconstruction surgery

Vascular thrombosis is one of the major postoperative complications of free flap microvascular breast reconstruction operations. It is associated with higher morbidity, higher cost, increased length of hospital stay, and potentially flap loss. Our purpose is to evaluate the rate of this complication and whether patient characteristics play a role. Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, we examined the clinical data of patients who underwent free flap breast reconstruction between 2009 and 2010 in the United States. Multivariate and univariate regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors of flap thrombosis. A total of 15,211 patients underwent free flap breast reconstruction surgery (immediate reconstruction: 43%). The most common flap was the free deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap (53.6%), followed by free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap (43.1%), free superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap (2%), and free gluteal artery perforator (GAP) flap (1.3%). The overall rate of flap thrombosis was 2.4 %, with the highest rate seen in the SIEA group (11.4%) and the lowest in the TRAM group (1.7%). Peripheral vascular disease (adjusted odds ration [AOR] 10.61), SIEA flap (AOR, 4.76) and delayed reconstruction (AOR, 1.42) were found to be statistically significant risk factors for flap thrombosis. Other comorbidities were not linked. While the overall rate of flap thrombosis in free flap breast reconstruction was relatively low (2.4%), Plastic Surgeons should be aware that patients with peripheral vascular disease and those undergoing free SIEA flap are at higher risk of flap thrombosis and they should closely monitor flaps to increase the chance for early salvage. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 34:589–594, 2014.     

The superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap: indications for breast reconstruction

The lower abdominal skin and fat have become a standard for breast reconstruction because the abdominal tissue can mimic the breast to a high degree. With today's increasing focus on safety and routine of microsurgical interventions, more attention must be paid to donor-site morbidity. The superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) free flap is the least invasive microsurgical procedure for breast reconstruction because this operative technique does not require harvesting of the rectus muscle or the abdominal fascia. A total of 11 breast reconstructions were performed with this technique and had an average follow-up of 23 months. The anatomy, operative technique, and various indications for the SIEA flaps are demonstrated.     

The versatility of the SIEA flap: a clinical assessment of the vascular territory of the superficial epigastric inferior artery.

Following the TRAM and the DIEP the SIEA flap is the next logical step to reduce the donor site morbidity in autologous breast reconstruction. The vascular axis of the SIEA flap, however, is completely different from the deep epigastric pedicle, on which previous lower abdominal flaps were based. Therefore, a mapping of the vascular territory, which can be reliably harvested on this pedicle, seems mandatory before this new technique can become established. AIM: To chart the angiosome of the superficial inferior epigastric artery with regard to breast reconstruction and to evaluate the random extension of the vascular territory, which can be reliably raised on this pedicle. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical, prospective study in a university-affiliated department of plastic surgery. PATIENTS: Ten patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction with the superficial inferior epigastric perforator flap and five patients undergoing aesthetic abdominoplasty with isolation of the abdominal flap on the superficial epigastric vessels. MATERIAL AND METHODS: After isolation of the abdominal panniculus on a single superficial inferior epigastric artery pedicle, the flap was divided in the four conventional zones according to Hartrampf. Perfusion in each of the four zones was measured on the table using the technique of dynamic laser-fluorescence videoangiography. RESULTS: Perfusion of Hartrampf Zone III occurred first (25s post-injection) and the perfusion index amounted median 89% of reference. Perfusion of Zone I occurred median 5s later and the relative perfusion was 80%. Perfusion of the contralateral zones II and IV was dramatically reduced to 8% and zero, respectively, and this reduction was statistically significant (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The true angiosome of the superficial epigastric artery is located laterally on the ipsilateral hemiabdomen. Its random extension is unreliable and ranges most frequently only to the midline. Based on the results of this study, survival of the skin and subcutaneous fat taken laterally to the border of the contralateral rectus sheath seems questionable. Therefore, the versatility of the SIEA flap for autologous breast reconstruction seems limited when compared with the conventional methods based on the deep inferior epigastric system.     

An anatomical study of the superficial inferior epigastric vessels in humans.

The lower abdominal skin and fat has become a standard for breast reconstruction in terms of skin texture, suppleness and colour. Concerns regarding donor site morbidity related to the harvest of rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap, based on the deep inferior epigastric vessels, have turned attention towards alternative options. The superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap is a fasciocutaneous flap that has been used for reconstruction of the breast, as well as head, neck and limb defects. In Taylor's classic dissection series the SIEA was 'absent' in 35% [Plast Reconstr Surg 56 (1975) 243]. In our series of 22 cadaver dissections (eight female, three male) the SIEA was identified in 20 and the vein (SIEV) in 21. In 15, the artery was located at the level of the inguinal ligament, within 1 cm of its midpoint. In 17, the origin, from the common femoral artery, was within 2 cm of the inguinal ligament. In 18, the SIEA arose as a common trunk with the superficial circumflex iliac artery, superficial external pudendal artery, and/or the deep circumflex iliac artery. Mean SIEA calibre was 1.9 mm and the mean pedicle length from origin to inguinal ligament was 5.2 cm. Our findings suggest that the SIEA is more consistently present and larger in calibre than previously reported, and consequently may be of greater clinical use than previously believed.     

腹壁浅动脉蒂游离腹壁皮瓣乳房再造术的初步临床应用

目的 探讨采用腹壁浅动脉（superficial inferior epigastric artery,SIEA）蒂游离腹壁皮瓣乳房再造术方法 、特点及适应证.方法 术前采用多层螺旋CT（multipledetector-row computed tomography,MDCT）三维血管造影及多普勒血流探测仪检查SIEA的直径、走行及分布,于脐与阴阜上缘之间设计皮瓣,采用单蒂或双蒂SIEA,与胸廓内动,静脉吻合,腹部供区直接拉拢缝合.结果 4例乳房再造病例皮瓣全部存活,皮瓣和腹部供区无脂肪液化、坏死、切口裂开、腹壁薄弱及腹壁疝等并发症的出现,再造乳房外形效果满意.结论 SIEA蒂游离腹壁皮瓣与腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣（DIEP）,横行腹支肌肌（TRAM）皮瓣乳房再造术提供同样的腹部皮肤和组织量,但却减轻了对腹部功能和形态的损害,在做好充分的术前血管评估、严格把握适应证和熟练掌握显微外科技术的前提下,是一种可供选择的乳房再造方法.     

SIEA flap leads to an increase in abdominal seroma rates compared to DIEP flap for breast reconstruction

In this study, we evaluated the peri-operative abdominal drain volumes and length of hospital admission between our superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) and deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) patients to determine whether SIEA flaps were associated with increased post-operative abdominal drainage and length of hospital stay. We studied consecutive patients who had breast reconstruction using either a free SIEA (seven) or DIEP (28) flaps. All patients had abdominal drains inserted, and cumulative drainage measurements were taken every 24 h. Data on patient's age, BMI, length of hospital stay, smoking history, and abdominal fluid drainage were collected. Statistical analyses were performed using a t test (Mann–Whitney). A statistically significant difference (P = 0.029) was observed in the total abdominal drainage between the two groups. The mean drainage volume in the SIEA group was 2,248 ml and 531 ml in the DIEP group. No association was observed between smoking and drainage volume in the DIEP group. Similarly, obesity did not appear to influence drainage volumes in either the SIEA or the DIEP groups. The average length of stay for the SIEA group was 10.4 days and 9.1 days in the DIEP group, although this was not statistically significant (P = 0.351). While abdominal wall morbidity is reduced in patients undergoing an SIEA flap for breast reconstruction, in our series, we found that the SIEA flap was associated with a significant increase in abdominal drain volume relative to the DIEP flap, which translated to an extra day in hospital.     

腹壁浅动脉蒂游离腹壁皮瓣乳房再造术的初步临床应用

目的 探讨采用腹壁浅动脉(superficial inferior epigastric artery,SIEA)蒂游离腹壁皮瓣乳房再造术方法 、特点及适应证.方法 术前采用多层螺旋CT(multipledetector-row computed tomography,MDCT)三维血管造影及多普勒血流探测仪检查SIEA的直径、走行及分布,于脐与阴阜上缘之间设计皮瓣,采用单蒂或双蒂SIEA,与胸廓内动,静脉吻合,腹部供区直接拉拢缝合.结果 4例乳房再造病例皮瓣全部存活,皮瓣和腹部供区无脂肪液化、坏死、切口裂开、腹壁薄弱及腹壁疝等并发症的出现,再造乳房外形效果满意.结论 SIEA蒂游离腹壁皮瓣与腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣(DIEP),横行腹支肌肌(TRAM)皮瓣乳房再造术提供同样的腹部皮肤和组织量,但却减轻了对腹部功能和形态的损害,在做好充分的术前血管评估、严格把握适应证和熟练掌握显微外科技术的前提下,是一种可供选择的乳房再造方法.     

腹壁浅动脉蒂游离腹壁皮瓣乳房再造术的初步临床应用

目的 探讨采用腹壁浅动脉(superficial inferior epigastric artery,SIEA)蒂游离腹壁皮瓣乳房再造术方法 、特点及适应证.方法 术前采用多层螺旋CT(multipledetector-row computed tomography,MDCT)三维血管造影及多普勒血流探测仪检查SIEA的直径、走行及分布,于脐与阴阜上缘之间设计皮瓣,采用单蒂或双蒂SIEA,与胸廓内动,静脉吻合,腹部供区直接拉拢缝合.结果 4例乳房再造病例皮瓣全部存活,皮瓣和腹部供区无脂肪液化、坏死、切口裂开、腹壁薄弱及腹壁疝等并发症的出现,再造乳房外形效果满意.结论 SIEA蒂游离腹壁皮瓣与腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣(DIEP),横行腹支肌肌(TRAM)皮瓣乳房再造术提供同样的腹部皮肤和组织量,但却减轻了对腹部功能和形态的损害,在做好充分的术前血管评估、严格把握适应证和熟练掌握显微外科技术的前提下,是一种可供选择的乳房再造方法.     

Head and neck reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: A report of two cases

Rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (RAMC) free flaps are preferred for head and neck reconstruction because of the abundant blood supply to the rectus abdominis musculocutaneous. In contrast, the indications for deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flaps in head and neck reconstruction are limited. In this report, two cases of oral cavity reconstruction with DIEP free flaps are described. In both cases, the defect was reconstructed with a DIEP free flap because it could avoid functional damage to the donor site. Successful reconstruction with a two skin‐island method was performed in both patients. Furthermore, donor site morbidity was minimal in both patients. When a DIEP free flap is used for head and neck reconstruction, elimination of dead space is the most difficult problem, because a DIEP free flap does not contain well‐vascularized muscle tissue. We compensate for this disadvantage with a flap designed to include a de‐epithelialized skin flap. Although this technique is not always the first choice for head and neck reconstruction, it is suitable for patients who wish to avoid donor site morbidity. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. Microsurgery, 2009.