The value of duplicate slides on atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade intraepithelial lesion

Atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H) category was added to the 2001 Bethesda System. ASC-H accounts for a small percentage (0.2-0.6%) of abnormal Pap smears and includes heterogenous group of lesions. There are more high-grade cervical lesions (30-50%) in ASC-H than ASC-US (10-15%). An accurate Pap diagnosis is crucial for appropriate patient follow-up and treatment. A total of 43 consecutive ASC-H cases were collected from October 2007 to March 2008, and all duplicate and the original slides were reviewed blindly at the end of the study. On review of the duplicate Pap slides, 18 cases had diagnostic SIL cells (15 HSIL, 2 LSIL with ASC-H, and 1 LSIL). The duplicate slides could have potentially changed 18 (41.9%) ASC-H diagnoses to a more definitive SIL diagnosis. On review of the original Pap slides, 8 of these 18 cases also had HSIL cells. Twenty-one follow-up cervical biopsies (21/43, 48.8%) showed 12 CIN 2/3, 4 CIN 1, 1 VAIN 1, 2 cervical polyps, 1 negative for dysplasia, and 1 insufficient for diagnosis. The CIN 2/3 rate was 57.1% (12/21) based on the original ASC-H Pap diagnosis. The CIN 2/3 rates were 80% (8/10) with SIL cells on duplicate slides and 36.4% (4/11) without SIL cases on duplicate slides. Our study suggested that duplicate slides were very useful for further classification of ASC-H, but other ancillary tests might be necessary for some cases. We propose a systematic approach using combined duplicate slides and reflex HPV testing to further classify ASC-H.     

Microglandular hyperplasia has a cytomorphological spectrum overlapping with atypical squamous cells-cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H)

We retrospectively evaluated cytological interpretations of conventional cervical smears in 48 cases of biopsy-proven microglandular hyperplasia and compared them with 15 negative controls. A glandular pattern was noted in all 48 cases but was predominant in 73% (35/48) of the cases. Immature metaplastic pattern was present in 71% (34/48) and was predominant in 27% (13/48). These features were not observed in negative control smears. 85% of cases (41/48) were interpreted as negative for epithelial cell abnormality. Two cases with predominantly glandular pattern (6%, 2/35) were interpreted as atypical glandular cells. Five cases with predominantly immature metaplastic pattern (38%, 5/13) showed checkerboard arrangement or rows of single cells with slightly larger atypical nuclei leading to interpretation as "atypical squamous cells-cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion." The metaplastic cells with normoblast-like karyorrhectic apoptotic debris confined to the nuclear area were scattered among these cells in microglandular hyperplasia with metaplastic pattern.     

Atypical squamous cells,cannot exclude high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: Diagnostic features in surepath™ cervical samples

This study was undertaken to identify the situations in which a diagnosis of “Atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude a high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC‐H)” is offered in SurePath? cervical samples and to identify cytological criteria helpful in predicting high‐grade disease. 2,335 (3.4%) SurePath samples reported as atypical squamous cells (ASC) over a period of 2 years, including 1,112 cases with known hrHPV status were retrieved. 105/1,112 cases were categorized into ASC‐H, and slides were available for review in 88/105 cases. These 88 samples were divided into two categories based on follow‐up histological outcome and hrHPV status–category A: cases with CIN2+ lesions on follow‐up (n = 48) and category B: cases with ≤CIN1 lesions or hrHPV negative status (n = 40). 78% (82/105) cases of ASC‐H tested positive for hrHPV. Overall CIN2+ lesions were found in 50.3% (53/105) cases. Of 88 cases reviewed, HCGs were noted in 56.3% (27/48) cases in category A and 75% (30/40) cases in category B. Dispersed metaplastic cells and scattered small atypical cells were seen in 37.5% (18/48) cases in category A and 12.5%(5/40) in category B. The majority of cases with dispersed atypical cells had <20 cells/sample and cases with HCGs had <10 HCGs per sample. The majority of the cases reported as ASC‐H contained HCGs. Of these groups with nuclear crowding, disorganization and those with steep edges (“blocks”) are likely to predict high‐grade disease. The samples with only dispersed atypical cells had <20 cells/sample in majority of cases. In these, a disproportionate andespecially high nuclear: cytoplasmic ratio and irregular chromatin were the most useful features in predicting high‐grade disease. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: the practice experience of a hospital-based reference laboratory with this new Bethesda system diagnostic category

The 2001 Bethesda System diagnostic category of atypical squamous cells cannot exclude a high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H) was developed and implemented after many studies that proved its clinical relevance. In this study, we describe the practice experience of a hospital-based reference laboratory with this new diagnostic category. The anatomic pathology computer database was searched, and 414 Papanicolaou (Pap) smears signed out as ASC-H were discovered among 60,390 Pap smear accessions over a 17-month period of time. One hundred four cases had corresponding tissue specimens. Slides from all Pap smears and tissue specimens were reviewed, and five Pap smears were reclassified, leaving 99 study cases. In our laboratory, 88.9% of the study cases had either low or high grade dysplasia diagnosed on subsequent tissue specimens. The positive predictive value of ASC-H for histologically proven high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL's) was 40.4%. Of those having human papillomavirus (HPV) hybrid capture II testing, high-risk HPV types were detected in 73.9% of cases. The majority of study cases had less than 25 atypical cells. In two hysterectomy cases and three loop electrosurgical excession procedure (LEEP) conization cases, high-grade dysplasia was present as a single microscopic focus, suggesting that the paucity of atypical cells in ASC-H Pap smears may be secondary to small lesion sampling. Thirteen study patients were postmenopausal and 30.8% had low-grade dysplasia, and of these, 46.2% had high-grade dysplasia on subsequent tissue specimens. In conclusion, our practice experience with ASC-H is similar to that reported in the literature before the 2001 Bethesda System.     

HPV检测在“不典型鳞状细胞-不除外宫颈高度上皮内病变”中的意义

目的探讨高危型人乳头状瘤病毒(HR-HPV)检测对细胞病理学诊断为不典型鳞状细胞-不除外宫颈高度上皮内病变的(ASC-H)患者的临床处理价值。方法 2004年6月～2007年4月于中日友好医院妇产科门诊进行宫颈细胞学检查的患者17 125例,选择其中细胞学诊断结果为不典型鳞状细胞的患者,应用第二代杂交捕获方法检测HR-HPV,观察HR-HPV检测对细胞学诊断结果为ASC-H进行分流的意义。结果 HR-HPV阳性的ASC-H患者中宫颈高度病变的检出率(48.1%)显著高于ASC-US(25.2%),(P<0.01)。13例HR-HPV阴性的ASC-H患者中1例宫颈活组织检查结果为CIN2(5.9%),与ASC-US(5.7%)相比无差异。在ASC-US和ASC-H患者中,HR-HPV检测对于宫颈高度病变的敏感性分别为82.8%、96.2%,阴性预告值分别为94.3%,92.3%。结论对于HR-HPV阴性的ASC-H患者可以考虑定期随诊细胞学和高危型HPV,减少阴道镜检查,HR-HPV检测可能对于ASC-H患者同样具有分流作用。     

高危型人乳头状瘤病毒检测在不除外高度鳞状上皮内病变的不典型鳞状上皮细胞中的意义

目的 探讨高危型人乳头状瘤病毒(HR-HPV)的检测在宫颈细胞学不除外高度鳞状上皮内病变的不典型鳞状上皮细胞(ASC-H)中的意义.方法 对45例诊断为ASC-H的患者用杂交捕获二代(HC-Ⅱ)方法检测HR-HPV DNA含量,并进行阴道镜检查及活检,分析其结果之间的关系.结果 45例ASC-H的活检结果为宫颈鳞状上皮内病变(SIL)33例(73.3%);45例ASC-H中36例HR-HPV阳性,其中高度鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)及以上病变者19例(52.8%);9例HR-HPV阴性病例中,没有HSIL及以上病变;HR-HPV对ASC-H患者HSIL的敏感性及阴性预测值均为100%.结论 ASC-H高度提示宫颈病变的存在;HR-HPV可以作为ASC-H患者是否需要立即阴道镜检查的一个预测指标,HR-HPV阳性者应立即阴道镜检查及活检,HR-HPV阴性是HSIL阴性的一个预测指标.     

Patients with negative cervical biopsies after papanicolaou test interpretations of "atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion": comparative longitudinal follow-up

Approximately half of women with a Papanicolaou (pap) test interpretation of “atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion” (ASC-H) will have less than a high-grade dysplasia diagnosed on their follow-up cervical biopsy sample. Herein, we compared the follow-up findings in a group of women with a negative cervical biopsy after a pap test interpretation of ASC-H (study group) with those of a randomly selected control group of women whose pap tests were interpreted as “negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy” during the same period. The diagnoses in every follow-up sample in the control and study groups were tabulated. Patients with previous ASC-H or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion interpretations, and/or high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) diagnoses, were excluded. Both groups were then statistically compared regarding the diagnostic frequencies of each of the Bethesda 2001 categories and CIN grades. Of the 122 patients with ASC-H interpretations and documented histologic follow-up, the first follow-up biopsy was negative for dysplasia in 20 (16.4%). Seventy-six follow-up samples (70 pap tests, 6 biopsies) were obtained from these 20 patients. In the control group of 262 women with pap tests interpreted as “negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy,” 641 follow-up samples (629 pap tests, 12 biopsies) were obtained. Patients in the study group were significantly more likely than their control group counterparts to have a follow-up (1) cytologic and/or histologic abnormality (23/76 vs 76/641, respectively; P = .00006), (2) “atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance” (ASC-US) interpretation (13/76 vs 43/641; P = .005), and (3) CIN grade 1 diagnosis (4/76 vs 10/641; P = .05). Approaching statistical significance was the comparatively increased frequency of CIN grade 2 to 3 diagnoses in the study group (2/76 vs 2/641; P = .058). If the analysis is restricted to 1 follow-up sample (the most severe) per patient, patients in the study group were still more likely than those in the control group to have a follow-up cytologic and/or histologic abnormality (12/20 vs 40/262; P = .0002), ASC-US interpretation (6/20 vs 22/262; P = .008), and follow-up CIN grade 2 to 3 diagnosis (2/20 vs 2/262; P = .03). It is concluded that patients whose cervical biopsies are devoid of dysplasia after an ASC-H interpretation still require close surveillance and follow-up because their risk of being diagnosed with follow-up cervical abnormalities is significantly above baseline.     

Clinical significance of atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion with histologic correlation—: A 9‐Year experience

Atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC‐H) is a recognized category in the 2001 Bethesda Nomenclature System for cervical cytology. Although current ASCCP guidelines recommend colposcopic follow‐up, more recent studies are suggesting prior triage for HPV‐DNA analysis. We report on our experience at the University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics. From January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2011 (9‐y), the cytopathology laboratory processed 109,424 Pap Tests, of which 281 (0.26%) were diagnosed as ASC‐H. Tissue follow‐up was available in 181 (64%) of these cases, of which 45 (25%) were negative/cervicitis, 41 (23%) were CIN 1, 36 (20%) were CIN 2 and 59 (32%) were CIN 3. Stratification by age groups showed a higher percentage of high grade (CIN 2+) lesions (65%) in the premenopausal age group as compared with high grade lesion (35%) in the postmenopausal age group, whereas negative/CIN1 biopsies were more common in postmenopausal (65%) as compared to premenopausal (44%) women. Our data support the use of colposcopy in the management of women with ASC‐H on Pap Tests. However, in the older age group, prior HPV‐DNA testing may be of benefit to better identify those women at risk for high grade lesions. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2013;41:943–946. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Reducing "atypical squamous cells" overdiagnosis on cervicovaginal smears by diligent cytology screening

The frequency of possible reasons for "atypical squamous cells" (ASC) overdiagnosis on Papanicolaou (Pap) smears was analyzed. Pap smears of 199 women with negative biopsy outcome after an ASC diagnosis were reviewed. Special attention was paid to presence of reproductive tract infections (RTIs), perimenopausal cells (PM cells), immature metaplastic cells, hormone-related alterations, and drying artefacts. Comparisons were made using χ(2) test between the two ASC qualifiers and also between premenopausal and peri/postmenopausal women. Possible reasons for ASC overdiagnosis could be assigned on Pap smear review in 88/199 (44.2%) negative biopsies. Overall, PM cells were the most frequent reason for ASC overdiagnosis, being present in 35/199 (17.6%) smears. RTIs were the next most common cause (14.6%). PM cells were the most significant confounding factors for persistent ASC undetermined significance (ASC-US) over interpretation (20.2%) while in none of the cases these were interpreted as ASC-H (P = 0.004). Of these, 32 smears belonged to peri/postmenopausal women while only three to premenopausal women (P < 0.001). Immature metaplastic cells were significantly more frequent cause of ASC-H rather than ASC-US interpretation (P = 0.007). RTIs and drying artefacts were more frequently overcalled as ASC-US (in premenopausal women) while hormonal changes were interpreted as ASC-H. Hormone related changes, immature metaplastic cells and drying artefacts more commonly resulted in ASC interpretation in peri/ postmenopausal smears. The results of this study suggest that diligent screening can substantially reduce ASC overdiagnosis, thereby reducing the referrals/ follow ups.     

Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance--rule out high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: cytopathologic characteristics and clinical correlates

The significance and clinical management of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) on cervical cytologic smears has been an area of much controversy. This study compiled a list of criteria useful in identifying the subset of cases that would be categorized as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance- rule out high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H) in the new Bethesda System terminology, which eventuate in a diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). The cytopathology files at Johns Hopkins Hospital were searched for ASC-H cases from the 3-yr period 1996-1998, which had definitive clinicopathologic follow-up (colposcopy and cervical biopsies). The smears were reviewed, cytomorphologic features studied, and clinical correlations performed. ASC-H was diagnosed in 257 of 45,428 gynecologic smears (0.6%), 72 having had clinicopathologic follow-up. Of these 72 cases, 35 (49%) on follow-up had a negative/reactive diagnosis (NR), whereas 37 (51%) turned out to be CIN [CIN-I-18 (49%) and CIN II and III-19 (51%)]. The significant cytomorphologic differences in the ASC-H category with a CIN follow-up (compared with an NR follow-up) were fewer atypical cells, more often discohesive or seen singly, more monomorphic, a higher nuclear-to-cytoplasmic (N/C) ratio, greater nuclear hyperchromasia, more coarse, unevenly dispersed chromatin, more prominent nuclear membrane irregularities, lack of nucleoli, chromocenters or nuclear grooves, and lack of an inflammatory background. Careful attention to subtle cytomorphologic characteristics may be helpful for a more definitive subdivision of ASC-H terminology into a NR and a CIN diagnosis.     

细胞块p16联合高危型HPV检测在ASCUS患者分流管理中的作用

目的 探讨细胞块p16联合高危型人乳头瘤病毒(high-risk human papillomavirus,HR-HPV)检测在未明确意义的非典型鳞状上皮(atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance,ASCUS)患者分流管理中的作用.方法 选取108例子宫颈液基细胞学诊断为ASCUS的病例,同时行HR-HPV杂交捕获法Ⅱ(hybrid capture 2,HC2)检测及免疫组化p16染色,均行阴道镜下活检.结果 (1)p16表达率和HR-HPV检出率在炎症组、湿疣/CIN1、CIN2、CIN3组中分别为12.5％ (6/48)和31.25％(15/48)、60.53％ (23/38)和84.21％ (21/38),84.62％ (11/13)和92.31％(12/13)、100％ (9/9)和100％ (9/9),组间差异有统计学意义(P＜0.001);湿疣/CIN1组与CIN2/3组间p16表达率分别为60.53％ (23/38)、90.91％ (20/22),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.0125).(2)p16联合HR-HPV检测、单纯行p16和HR-HPV检测在ASCUS中分流子宫颈病变的敏感性和阴性预测值分别为98.33％ (59/60)、71.67％ (43/60)、88.33％ (53/60),97.06％ (33/34)、71.19％ (42/59)、82.5％ (33/40),差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05).p16 +/HC2+者高级别病变检出率(44.19％,19/43)与p16-/HC2+者(8％,2/25)比较差异有统计学意义(P ＜0.001).结论 p16蛋白可以作为一种辅助诊断CIN的免疫组化标志物.细胞块p16联合HR-HPV检测可以有效分流ASCUS中的子宫颈病变患者.     

Triage of cervical cytological diagnoses of atypical squamous cells by DNA methylation of paired boxed gene 1 (PAX1)

Detection of cervical high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in patients with equivocal cytological abnormalities, such as atypical squamous cells (ASC) of undetermined significance (ASCUS) or inability to exclude high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (ASC‐H) is still a challenge. This study tested the efficacy of PAX1 methylation analysis in the triage of cervical ASCUS and ASC‐H and compared its performance with Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) HPV test. A hospital‐based case–control study was conducted. Cervical scrapings from patients with ASCUS or ASC‐H were used for the quantitative methylation analysis of PAX1 methylation by MethyLight and HPV testing by HC2. Patients with ASC‐H or ASCUS with repeated abnormal smears underwent colposcopic biopsy and subsequent therapies. Diagnoses were made by histopathology at a follow‐up of 2 years. The efficacies of detecting high‐grade lesions were compared. Fifty‐eight cervical scrapings with cytological diagnosis of ASCUS (n = 41) and ASC‐H (n = 17) were analyzed. One of the 41 (2.4%) ASCUS patients and seven of 17 (41.2%) ASC‐H patients were confirmed to have HSIL. After dichotomy of the PMR, PAX1 methylation rates were significantly higher in ASC developing HSIL compared with those developing reactive atypia (87.5% vs. 12.5%, P < 0.001). Testing PAX1 methylation in cervical swabs of patients with ASC confers better sensitivity (87.5% vs. 62.5%) and specificity (98.0% vs. 86.0%) than HC2 HPV testing. We show for the first time that PAX1 hypermethylation analysis may be a better choice than HC2 in the triage of ASCUS and ASC‐H. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2013. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. A follow-up study of conventional and liquid-based preparations in a high-risk population

We compared the histologic follow-up of 368 smears or slides with an interpretation of "atypical squamous cells, cannot rule out high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion" (ASC-H) based on conventional and liquid-based preparations and age groups in a high-risk population. Patients with an ASC-H interpretation were 17 to 87 years old (mean, 36.8 years). The specimens were 52 liquid-based preparations and 316 conventional smears. For 218 cases (59.2%), including 28 liquid-based preparations (65%) and 190 conventional smears (58%), histologic follow-up was available. In 20 liquid-based preparations (71%) and 152 conventional smears (80.0%), cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) or higher was revealed on subsequent biopsy. Other results were as follows: liquid-based preparations, CIN1, 11 (55%); CIN2/3, 9 (45%); conventional smears, CIN1, 78 (51.3%); CIN2/3, 70 (46.1%); squamous cell carcinoma, 4 (2.6%). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of CIN or higher on subsequent biopsy after an interpretation of ASC-H based on preparation types. The incidences of CIN in patients 40 years old or older and patients younger than 40 years were 66% and 84%, respectively, a statistically significant difference. Because of the high incidence of clinically significant lesions noted on subsequent follow-up, patients with an interpretation of ASC-H should be observed closely and referred for colposcopic examination regardless of their age.     

Effect of Bethesda 2001 on reporting of atypical squamous cells (ASC) with special emphasis on atypical squamous cells-cannot rule out high grade (ASC-H)

We compared the overall ASC rate and the outcomes for women with different categories of ASC before and after TBS 2001 to evaluate the impact of TBS 2001. Our laboratory reported ASC in four subcategories before TBS 2001; ASC, favor reactive (ASC-R), favor low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) (ASC-L), undetermined significance (ASC-US), and ASC-H. Since the implementation of TBS 2001, we have been reporting ASC as ASC-US and ASC-H. After TBS 2001, our ASC rate decreased from 6.2% to 4% (P < 0.0001). Before TBS 2001, ASC-R carried the same risk as ASC-US for underlying condyloma/CIN 1. Moreover, ASC-R was rarely associated with CIN 2 or 3. Before TBS 2001, ASC-H captured more low-grade (condyloma/CIN 1) and less high-grade (CIN 2, 3, and SCC) lesions compared to after TBS 2001. More women with ASC-H after TBS 2001 underwent colposcopy (80% vs. 71%, P < 0.05). Twenty-two percent of women with ASC-H required 2-4 colposcopies to identify the high-grade lesion. Our results confirm that consistent application of TBS 2001 terminology for ASC reduces the ASC rate, and better identifies women at high risk for CIN 2, 3, and SCC. In addition, ASC-H requires very close clinical follow-up as a significant percentage of women require more than one colposcopy to identify the high-grade lesion.     

Outcome of "Atypical squamous cells" in a cervical cytology screening program: implications for follow up in resource limited settings

(1) To study the incidence and outcome of "Atypical squamous cells (ASC)" diagnosis in a hospital based cytology screening programme. (2) To work out a feasible strategy for follow up of Atypical squamous cells-undetermined significance (ASC-US) and Atypical squamous cells-cannot exclude high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H) in resource limited settings. A total of 29,475 women were screened cytologically through Pap tests. The epithelial cell abnormalities (ECA) detected on screening were reviewed by the cytopathologists and classified according to Bethesda 2001 system. The women with ASC-US reports were followed up by two repeat cytology tests at 3 and 6 months of the initial visit. The persistent ASC-US cases or the cases which revealed squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) on follow up smears; as well as all ASC-H and above cases were referred for coloposcopic evaluation. ASC diagnosis comprised 3.6% of all reports. These were qualified as ASC-US (3.36%) and ASC-H (0.22%). On follow up, only 7 CIN 2 or worse (3.2%) lesions were detected on 218 biopsies in ASC-US category while in ASC-H qualifier 16 CIN 2 and above lesions (30.8%) were picked up on 52 colposcopic biopsies. The difference between ASC-US and ASC-H categories for a CIN 2 or worse outcome was highly significant (P < 0.001). ASC-H qualifier has a high likelihood for an ominous histological outcome and warrants an immediate colposcopic evaluation. On the other hand, ASC-US cases can be managed conservatively by repeat cytology tests at regular intervals without a significant risk of missing a high grade lesion. Diligent screening of cervical smears can judiciously downgrade some cases overcalled as ASC because of inflammatory atypia and thereby reduce referrals in geographic settings with high prevalence of reproductive tract infections. High risk HPV (HR HPV) testing may be a useful adjunct to further reduce referrals by selecting the women who require colposcopic evaluation.     

Management of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix with human papilloma virus infection among young women aged less than 25 years

Current ASCCP guidelines recommend repeat cytology 12 months after HPV‐positive results in women aged 21–24 years with either atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) or a low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL). The purpose of this study was to validate an algorithm in such women with ASCUS or LSIL. A multicenter cross‐sectional study was carried out at three academic hospitals involving 40,847 Korean women who underwent cervical cancer screening with cytology and HPV testing with or without subsequent colposcopic biopsies between January 2007 and December 2013. Among a total of 3,193 women with available histopathology data, 762 women with ASCUS and 758 with LSIL were HPV‐positive. Among HPV‐positive women with ASCUS, 38.5% of women aged 21–24 years had ≥CIN2, compared to 20.8% of women aged 30–65 years and 21.1% of the total women. Among HPV‐positive women with LSIL, 25.8% aged 21–24 years had ≥CIN2, compared to 21.2% of women aged 30–65 years and 21.9% of the total women. In HPV‐positive women with ASCUS/LSIL aged less than 25 years, the prevalence of ≥CIN2 lesions was 34.5%, which was significantly higher than that (21.0%) in women aged ≥25 years. The risk of ≥CIN2 lesions in HPV‐positive Korean women aged 21–24 years with ASCUS or LSIL was not lower than that in older women. Colposcopic examination should be considered for management of HPV‐positive young women with ASCUS or LSIL. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2016;44:959–963. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Evaluation of p16 immunostaining to predict high‐grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with Pap results of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance

p16 immunostaining has been examined to detect high‐grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade (CIN2+) in Pap cytology specimens. However, the utility of p16 in predicting CIN2+ in Pap specimens with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC‐US) or atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high‐grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasm (ASC‐H), is controversial. In this study, we evaluated the utility of p16 immunostaining for predicting CIN2+ in 78 Pap specimens with ASC‐US/ASC‐H and compared the results in high‐risk HPV DNA and the follow‐up biopsies. p16 immunostaining was positive in 47% (37/78) of the Pap specimens. Of the 13 Pap specimens with follow‐up biopsy results of CIN2+, 7 (54%) were positive for p16. p16 positivity in the Pap specimens was not significantly associated with a CIN2+ biopsy result (P = 0.76). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of p16 immunostaining for predicting CIN2+ were 54%, 52%, 19%, and 85%, respectively. High‐risk HPV DNA was detected in 40% (31/78) of the Pap specimens. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of HPV DNA for predicting CIN2+ were 100%, 72%, 42%, and 100%, respectively. High‐risk HPV genotypes were detected in six p16‐negative specimens with follow‐up biopsy results of CIN2+. Our findings suggest that the utility of p16 immunostaining for predicting CIN2+ in Pap specimens with ASC‐US/ASC‐H is limited. Scant abnormal cells in Pap specimens with ASC‐US/ASC‐H may have contributed to the low p16 sensitivity. Diagn. Cytopathol., 2011. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

CINtec® PLUS dual immunostain: A triage tool for cervical pap smears with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion

ASC and LSIL comprise the majority of abnormal Pap smears. Currently, high‐risk human papillomavirus testing is utilized to triage women with ASC for colposcopy; however, no cost effective triage method is available for LSIL. p16 and Ki‐67 have each been shown to be good biomarkers for high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (HG CIN).We evaluated the role of the CINtec® PLUS p16/Ki‐67 dual immunostain as a marker for underlying (U) or subsequent (S) HG CIN. One hundred and eighty eight cervical SurePath Pap smears with histological and/or cytological follow‐up were retrieved from our departmental files. The Pap stained slides were destained and then immunostained utilizing the CINtec® PLUS dual staining reagent kit. Results of the dual stain were correlated with follow‐up diagnoses. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of CINtec® PLUS for U or S HG CIN were compared with those of HR HPV testing and with p16 and Ki‐67 immunostaining alone. The sensitivity of CINtec® PLUS for U or S HG CIN was 91% in the ASC group and 100% in the LSIL group, while the corresponding specificities were 61 and 43%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of CINtec® PLUS for U or S HG CIN in both groups combined were 97 and 53%, respectively. CINtec® PLUS was more specific than HR HPV testing and Ki‐67 and p16 immunostains alone in detecting an U or S HG CIN. CINtec® PLUS is a helpful adjunct in identifying U or S HG CIN when applied to SurePath Pap smears with ASC or LSIL. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

p16(INK4A) is a surrogate biomarker for a subset of human papilloma virus-associated dysplasias of the uterine cervix as determined on the Pap smear

Recently, p16(INK4A) has been identified as a biomarker for human papilloma virus (HPV)-induced dysplastic lesions of the cervix and it has been suggested that it may be a useful diagnostic aid for these lesions. This study therefore was performed to determine the utility of p16 expression in a series of Papanicolaou (Pap) smears collected in liquid medium and to determine its benefit, if any, over HPV testing. One hundred seven cases, including 23 negative cases, 34 with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), 16 with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), 29 with atypical squamous cells of uncertain significance (ASC-US), and 5 cases with ASC suspicious for HSIL (ASC-H), were evaluated for both p16 expression and HPV DNA. We observed p16 expression in only 36% of all cases with abnormal cytology (30/84) and in 40% of all cases associated with high-risk HPV. The highest rate of positivity (80%) and the highest levels of expression (more than three to five positive cells/10x field) were seen in HSIL. Similar results were observed with ASC-H cases. This suggests that in equivocal cases, p16 may be used for confirmation of the diagnosis. On the other hand, p16 positivity was noted in only 21% of LSIL and ASC-US cases. This raises the interesting possibility, given that only a minority of LSIL cases progress on to higher-grade lesions, that p16 might be useful for triaging these patients for closer follow-up and/or further evaluation. Additional studies are required for confirmation.