Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor δ (PPARδ), a novel target site for drug discovery in metabolic syndrome

The development of new treatments for metabolic syndrome is urgent project for decreasing the prevalence of coronary heart disease and diabetes mellitus in the advanced countries. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)α and γ agonists have shed light on the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus, respectively. Among PPARs, analysis of the PPARδ functions is lagging behind because specific PPARδ agonists have not been developed. The appearance of new PPARδ agonists is brightening the prospects for elucidating the physiological role of PPARδ. PPARδ is a new target for the treatment of metabolic syndrome. In particular, the fact that fatty acid oxidation and energy dissipation in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue by PPARδ agonists lead to improved lipid profile, reduced adiposity and insulin sensitivity is a breakthrough. It seems that treatment of PPARδ agonists operate similarly to the caloric restriction and prolonged exercise. We suggest that the physiological role of PPARδ may be an indicator for switching from glucose metabolism to fatty acid metabolism. To receive new benefits of PPARδ agonists against metabolic syndrome by increasing fatty acid consumption in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue, we need to unveil more details on the functions of PPARδ itself and its agonists in the future.     

Design, synthesis, and structure-activity relationship study of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) delta-selective ligands

Improvements in our understanding of the functions of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) subtypes as master regulators of many biological functions have made it possible to develop novel PPAR ligands with characteristic subtype selectivity as biochemical tools and/or candidate drugs for the treatment of PPAR-dependent diseases such as metabolic syndrome, which includes type II diabetes, dyslipidemia, obesity, hypertension, and inflammation. Based on the findings that the glitazone-class antidiabetic agents, and fibrate-class antidyslipidemic agents are ligands of PPARgamma and PPARalpha respectively, much research interest has been focused on these two subtypes as therapeutic targets for the treatment of type II diabetes and dyslipidemia. In contrast, research interest in PPARdelta has been limited. However, since 2001, the availability of PPARdelta knockout animals and selective ligands has led to the uncovering of possible roles of PPARdelta in fatty acid metabolism, insulin resistance, reverse cholesterol transport, inflammation, and so on. It has become clear that ligands able to modulate PPARdelta-mediated pathways are candidates for the treatment of altered metabolic function. This review focuses on recent medicinal chemical studies to identify PPARdelta-selective agonists.     

Therapeutic significance of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor modulators in diabetes

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are a group of three nuclear receptor isoforms, identified and encoded by different genes: PPARalpha, PPARdelta and PPARgamma. Each subtype of PPAR appears to be differently expressed in a tissue-specific manner due to its binding to a specific consensus DNA sequence of peroxisome proliferator response elements (PPREs). PPARalpha plays a significant role in the regulation of nutrient metabolism, including fatty acid oxidation, gluconeogenesis and amino acid metabolism. PPARdelta is expressed ubiquitously and has been found to be effective in controlling dyslipidemia and cardiovascular diseases, while PPARgamma isotype is mainly expressed in adipose tissue where it stimulates adipogenesis and lipogenesis. Thus PPARs have emerged as potential molecular targets for the design and synthesis of a different class of compounds, considering the conformation of receptors for the treatment of human metabolic disorders. This review concerns the therapeutic importance of PPARs in diabetes drug development.     

AMP activated protein kinase: a next generation target for total metabolic control

Metabolic syndrome is characterized by a cluster of metabolic disorders, such as reduced glucose tolerance, hyperinsulinemia, hypertension, visceral obesity and lipid disorders. The benefit of exercise in maintaining total metabolic control is well known and recent research indicates that AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) may play an important role in exercise-related effects. AMPK is considered as a master switch in regulating glucose and lipid metabolism. AMPK is an enzyme that works as a fuel gauge, being activated in conditions of high phosphate depletion. In the liver, activation of AMPK results in decreased production of plasma glucose, cholesterol, triglyceride and enhanced fatty acid oxidation. AMPK is also robustly activated by skeletal muscle contraction and myocardial ischemia, and is involved in the stimulation of glucose transport and fatty acid oxidation by these stimuli. In adipose tissue, activated AMPK inhibits deposition of fat, but enhances breakdown and burning of stored fat, resulting in reduction of body weight. The two leading diabetic drugs, namely metformin and rosiglitazone, and adipokines, such as adiponectin and leptin, show their metabolic effects partially through AMPK. These data suggest that AMPK may be a key player in the development of new treatments for obesity, Type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome. In this review, the author provide insight into the role of AMPK as a probable target for treatment of metabolic syndrome.     

噻唑烷二酮类不良反应研究进展

噻唑烷二酮类胰岛素增敏剂通过增加外周组织对胰岛素的敏感性而改善胰岛素抵抗,降低血胰岛素水平、减少胰岛素用量,降低血糖和HbAlc,提高HDL-C水平,保护胰岛β细胞功能;还能对抗多种心血管疾病危险因子的损害,有益于糖尿病大血管和微血管并发症的防治.然而近年来有关噻唑烷二酮类药物不良反应的报道越来越多,部分病人甚至因此而停药.笔者综述噻唑烷二酮类药物不良反应.     

Role of PPAR- gamma agonist thiazolidinediones in treatment of pre-diabetic and diabetic individuals: a cardiovascular perspective

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are nuclear fatty acid receptors, which contain a type II zinc finger DNA binding motif and a hydrophobic ligand binding pocket. These receptors are thought to play an important role in metabolic diseases such as obesity, insulin resistance, and coronary artery disease. Three subtypes of PPAR receptors have been described: PPARalpha, PPARdelta/beta, and PPARgamma. PPARalpha is found in the liver, muscle, kidney, and heart. In the liver, its role is to up-regulate genes involved in fatty acid uptake (beta-oxidation and omega-oxidation). PPARdelta/beta is involved in fatty acid oxidation in muscle. PPARgamma has high expression in fat, low expression in the liver, and very low expression in the muscle. The thiazolidinediones (TZD) are synthetic ligands of PPARgamma. By activating a number of genes in tissues, PPARgamma increases glucose and lipid uptake, increases glucose oxidation, decreases free fatty acid concentration, and decreases insulin resistance. There is a sound rationale for the use of TZDs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and promising preliminary data in patients with patients with pre-diabetes. In patients with type 2 diabetes, thiazolidinediones had been shown to decrease mean HbA(1c)by 1.5% and lower HbA(1c) to less than 7% in 30% of patients. Decreased muscle insulin resistance primarily mediates the glucose lowering effect. In addition, there are several nonhypoglycemic effects of TZDs which may be beneficial to both diabetics and patients with pre-diabetes. These include effects on lipid metabolism, blood pressure, endothelial function, atherosclerotic plaque, coagulation, and albuminuria. In a pilot study, we recently demonstrated that insulin sensitizers such as thiazolidinediones appear to be associated with better clinical outcomes compared to insulin providers in diabetic patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes. In another study, we showed that the prediabetic state is a marker for worse prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes. In this article, we review the existing literature on the effectiveness of PPAR-gamma agonists in patients with either overt diabetes or a prediabetic state.     

Cardiovascular disease and PPARdelta: targeting the risk factors

Metabolism, in part, is regulated by the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs). The PPARs act as nutritional lipid sensors and three mammalian PPAR subtypes designated PPARalpha (NR1C1), PPARgamma (NR1C3) and PPARdelta (NR1C2) have been identified. This subgroup of nuclear hormone receptors binds DNA and controls gene expression at the nexus of pathways that regulate lipid and glucose homeostasis, energy storage and expenditure in an organ-specific manner. Recent evidence has demonstrated activation of PPARdelta in the major mass peripheral tissue (ie, adipose and skeletal muscle). It enhances glucose tolerance, insulin-stimulated glucose disposal, lipid catabolism, energy expenditure, cholesterol efflux and oxygen consumption. These effects positively influence the blood-lipid profile. Furthermore, PPARdelta activation produces a predominant type I/slow twitch/oxidative muscle fiber phenotype that leads to increased endurance, insulin sensitivity and resistance to obesity. PPARdelta has rapidly emerged as a potential target in the battle against dyslipidemia, insulin insensitivity, type II diabetes and obesity, with therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of cardiovascular disease risk factors. GW-501516 is currently undergoing phase II safety and efficacy trials in human volunteers for the treatment of dyslipidemia. The outcome of these clinical trials are eagerly awaited against a background of conflicting reports about cancer risks in genetically predisposed animal models. This review focuses on the potential pharmacological utility of selective PPARdelta agonists in the context of risk factors associated with metabolic and cardiovascular disease.     

The adipocyte as an endocrine organ in the regulation of metabolic homeostasis

Over the past decade and a half it has become increasingly clear that adipose tissue is a much more complex organ than was initially considered and that its metabolic functions extend well beyond the classical actions of thermoregulation and of storage and release of fatty acids. In fact, it is now well established that adipose tissue plays a critical role in maintenance of energy homeostasis through secretion of a large number of adipokines that interact with central as well as peripheral organs such as the brain, liver, pancreas, and skeletal muscle to control diverse processes, such as food intake, energy expenditure, carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, blood pressure, blood coagulation, and inflammation. While many of these adipokines are adipocyte-derived and have a variety of endocrine functions, others are produced by resident macrophages and interact in a paracrine fashion to control adipocyte metabolism. It is also abundantly clear that the dysregulation of adipokine secretion and action that occurs in obesity plays a fundamental role in the development of a variety of cardiometabolic disorders, including the metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, inflammatory disorders, and vascular disorders, that ultimately lead to coronary heart disease. Described herein are the traditional as well as endocrine roles of adipose tissue in controlling energy metabolism and their dysregulation in obesity that leads to development of cardiometabolic disorders, with a focus on what is currently known regarding the characteristics and roles in both health and disease of the adipocyte-derived adipokines, adiponectin, leptin, resistin, and retinol binding protein 4, and the resident macrophage-derived adipokines, tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Central Control of Food Intake'.     

Molecular mechanisms underlying the effects of cyclosporin A and sirolimus on glucose and lipid metabolism in liver,skeletal muscle and adipose tissue in an in vivo rat model

Cyclosporin A (CsA) and sirolimus (SRL) are immunosuppressive agents (IAs) associated with dyslipidemia, insulin resistance and new onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT). However, the molecular mechanisms involved are not fully understood. We investigated the effects of six-week treatment of either CsA or SRL on glucose and lipid metabolism in Wistar rats. The results show that, compared with vehicle-treated rats, SRL-treated rats were significantly lighter starting at week 5. CsA or SRL caused glucose intolerance, increased storage of lipids in the liver and skeletal muscle, and decreased the insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in isolated adipocytes. Furthermore, these agents significantly decreased genes involved in insulin action and glucose uptake, such as, IRS-1, Glut4 and Glut1, and increased genes and/or proteins involved in hepatic lipogenesis and gluconeogenesis, while decreasing them in adipose tissue. After either treatment PGC1α gene expression was down regulated in skeletal muscle, an important player in fatty acid oxidation. Moreover, there was an increase in IL-6 gene expression in adipose tissue in the SRL-treated rats, suggesting stimulation of lipolysis. The results of the present study suggest that CsA and SRL lead to metabolic alterations in liver, muscle and adipose tissue, which may contribute to the development of dyslipidemia and insulin resistance associated with immunosuppressive therapy.     

MECHANISMS OF INSULIN RESISTANCE AND NEW PHARMACOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO METABOLISM AND DIABETIC COMPLICATIONS

1. Resistance to insulin-mediated glucose transport and metabolism has been identified as a primary mechanism in the pathogenesis of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and as a target for drug development. The aetiology of insulin resistance is likely to be multifactorial, but the present review focuses on candidate post-receptor mechanisms of insulin resistance, particularly protein kinase C (PKC), and the metabolic and genetic significance of β₃-adrenoceptors (β₃-AR) in adipose tissue. 2. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that isoform-selective activation of PKC phosphorylates and down-regulates one or more substrates involved in glucose transport and metabolism (e.g. glycogen synthase and the insulin receptor) and recent studies have shown increased expression of calcium-independent isozymes (PKC-ε and PKC-θ) in the membrane fraction of skeletal muscle in fructose- and fat-fed rat models of insulin resistance. In addition, there is separate evidence that glucose-induced PKC activation plays an important role in the micro-and macrovascular complications of diabetes. 3. New pharmacological approaches to NIDDM and obesity have focused on insulin-sensitizing agents (e.g. troglitazone), β₃-AR agonists, anti-lipolytic drugs (e.g. the adenosine A₁ receptor agonist GR79236) and selective inhibitors of PKC isoforms (e.g. the inhibitor of PKC-β LY333531). Experimental studies with GR79236 show that this drug ameliorates the hypertriglyceridaemia induced by fructose feeding and that the reduction in fatty acid levels is associated with secondary improvements in glucose tolerance. 4. Recent insights into the pathogenesis of NIDDM and its associated complications have been used to develop a range of new therapeutic agents that are currently showing promise in clinical and preclinical development.     

Insulin resistance and PPAR insulin sensitizers

Drugs that reverse insulin resistance are of importance as insulin resistance is frequently associated with type 2 diabetes. The three peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) PPARalpha, PPAR90 and PPARgamma are essential for the actions of the many insulin sensitizers. PPARalpha activation enhances free fatty acid oxidation and potentiates anti-inflammatory effects, while PPARgamma is essential for normal adipocyte differentiation and proliferation, as well as fatty acid uptake and storage. Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are selective ligands of PPARgamma and act as insulin sensitizers. TZDs also suppress free fatty acids via the inhibition of lipolysis in adipose tissue. Insulin sensitizers currently under development include partial PPARgamma agonists and antagonists, and dual PPARalpha/PPARgamma agonists. Given that TZDs show anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant and antiprocoagulant properties in addition to their insulin sensitizing and antilipotoxic properties, a case may be made for initiating TZD therapy early in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, particularly in those patients at risk of cardiovascular disease. TZDs may also be an important therapeutic option in the treatment of metabolic syndrome.     

Targeting the liver in the metabolic syndrome: evidence from animal models

The metabolic syndrome is an emerging global epidemic characterized by clustering of metabolic abnormalities leading to increased cardiovascular risk: glucose intolerance or type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and "central" obesity. Scientists are decoding and piecing together the molecular texture underlying the metabolic syndrome: insulin resistance and dyslipidemia stand out as central pathophysiological events. In this picture, the liver rises as the leading organ in the maintenance of metabolic fitness; it serves as the first relay station for processing dietary information, and encloses the whole biochemical machinery for both glucose and lipid storage and disposal. In addition, the liver is a target of the different endocrine molecules secreted by pancreatic beta-cells and adipose tissue. Evidence collected in animal models supports the central role of the liver in the metabolic syndrome. While specific bereft of insulin sensitivity in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue fails to induce diabetes at certain extent, this is constantly the outcome in case of hepatic insulin resistance. Also, dyslipidemia is currently interpreted as the result of increased flux of free fatty acids to the liver with ensuing misbalance of lipoprotein synthesis and removal. In this review we bring together recent advances in the field of lipid sensing nuclear receptors, adipokines and other molecules responsible for metabolic fitness, and provide a putative coherent frame to conceive the pathophysiology of the metabolic syndrome.     

Discovery of acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase 2 inhibitors: comparison of a fluorescence intensity-based phosphate assay and a fluorescence polarization-based ADP Assay for high-throughput screening

Acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase (ACC) enzymes exist as two isoforms, ACC1 and ACC2, which play critical roles in fatty acid biosynthesis and oxidation. Though each isoform differs in tissue and subcellular localization, both catalyze the biotin- and ATP-dependent carboxylation of acetyl-coenzyme A to generate malonyl-coenzyme A, a key metabolite in the control of fatty acid synthesis and oxidation. The cytosolic ACC1 is expressed primarily in liver and adipose tissue, and uses malonyl-coenzyme A as a key building block in fatty acid biosynthesis. The mitochondrial ACC2 is primarily expressed in heart and skeletal muscle, where it is involved in the regulation of fatty acid oxidation. Inhibitors of ACC enzymes may therefore be useful therapeutics for diabetes, obesity, and metabolic syndrome. Two assay formats for these ATP-utilizing enzymes amenable to high-throughput screening are compared: a fluorescence intensity-based assay to detect inorganic phosphate and a fluorescence polarization-based assay to detect ADP. Acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase inhibitors were identified by these high-throughput screening methods and were confirmed in a radiometric high performance liquid chromatography assay of malonyl-coenzyme A production.     

PPAR- γ agonist in treatment of diabetes: cardiovascular safety considerations

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are nuclear fatty acid receptors, which contain a type II zinc finger DNA binding motif and a hydrophobic ligand binding pocket. These receptors are thought to play an important role in metabolic diseases such as obesity, insulin resistance, and coronary artery disease. Three subtypes of PPAR receptors have been described: PPARα, PPARδ/β, and PPARγ. PPARα is found in the liver, muscle, kidney, and heart. In the liver, its role is to up-regulate genes involved in fatty acid uptake, binding, β-oxidation and electron transport, and oxidative phosphorylation in subcutaneous fat but not in skeletal muscle. PPARδ/β is expressed in many tissues but markedly in brain, adipose tissue, and skin. PPARγ has high expression in fat, low expression in the liver, and very low expression in the muscle. The thiazolidinediones (TZD) are synthetic ligands of PPARγ. By activating a number of genes in tissues, PPARγ increases glucose and lipid uptake, increases glucose oxidation, decreases free fatty acid concentration, and decreases insulin resistance. Although, there is a rationale for the use of TZDs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, clinical studies have produced conflicting data. While currently used TZDs are clearly associated with heart failure (HF) worsening; with regards to cardiovascular outcomes, pioglitazone seems to be related to a trend toward reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, whereas rosiglitazone may actually increase risk of cardiovascular events. We review the existing literature on TZDs and discuss role and cardiovascular safety of these agents for the contemporary treatment of diabetes. Other side effects of these agents i.e. increase in osteoporosis and possible risk of bladder cancer is also discussed.     

Influences of levodopa on adipose tissue and skeletal muscle metabolism in patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease

OBJECTIVE: The substantial weight loss in Parkinson's patients may be related to direct influences of levodopa treatment on fat mobilization/oxidation. We assessed systemic and local metabolic responses to levodopa/benserazide in patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease. METHODS: We studied 10 Parkinson's disease patients and examined adipose tissue and skeletal muscle metabolism directly with microdialysis. We monitored dialysate concentrations of ethanol, glucose, lactate, pyruvate, and glycerol to assess tissue blood flow and metabolism before and after levodopa/benserazide intake. We also conducted in vitro studies on adipocytes from healthy women. RESULTS: Levodopa/benserazide increased serum levodopa, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC), and norepinephrine (P < 0.01). Serum adipose tissue and skeletal muscle glycerol did not change or decreased. Adipose tissue glycerol was inversely correlated with serum levodopa concentrations (P < 0.05). In isolated adipocytes, levodopa attenuated isoproterenol-induced glycerol release (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Levodopa/benserazide elicits pronounced metabolic changes in both adipose tissue and skeletal muscle with a switch from lipid to carbohydrate metabolism. In adipose tissue, levodopa/benserazide failed to activate lipolysis. Therefore, we suggest that levodopa/benserazide does not induce fat wasting through direct and acute influences on adipose tissue metabolism.