Gait analysis in patients with advanced Parkinson disease: different or additive effects on gait induced by levodopa and chronic STN stimulation

Summary. The aim of our study was to observe the effects on gait parameters induced by STN stimulation and levodopa medication in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease in order to determine different or additive effects. Therefore we examined 12 patients with advanced Parkinson disease after bilateral implantation of DBS into the STN. We assessed the motor score of the UPDRS and quantitative gait analysis under 4 treatment conditions: with and without stimulation as well as with and without levodopa. The mean improvement of the UPDRS motor score was almost the same with levodopa and DBS. Combining both therapies we saw a further improvement of the motor score. Gait parameters of patients with PD treated either with levodopa or STN stimulation were greatly improved. A significant difference between levodopa and STN stimulation could only be shown for the parameters velocity and step length. These parameters improved more with levodopa than with stimulation. The combination of both therapeutic methods showed the best results on the UPDRS motor score and gait parameters.     

Effect of bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation on parkinsonian gait

Clinical reports show that bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation is effective in improving parkinsonian gait. Quantitative analysis of the efficacy of STN stimulation on gait is of interest and can be carried out using a commercially available stride analyser. Ten parkinsonian patients (5 men, 5 women) with a mean age of 55.8, SD 9.6 years were included in our study. They had a mean duration of Parkinson's disease (PD) of 13.3, SD 4.5 years and a motor examination score (part III of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale) (UPDRS) of 43, SD 13 in off-stimulation off-drug condition. All the patients had bilateral chronic STN stimulation which had started from 3 to 36 months before the study. Patients were evaluated in off-drug and on-drug conditions both with and without stimulation. We analysed the principal gait measures: velocity, cadence, stride length, gait cycle, duration of single and double limb support. The clinical parkinsonian signs were evaluated with the part III of the UPDRS. In the off-drug condition, STN stimulation significantly (p < 0.05) improved velocity and stride length. The effect was similar to that of levodopa. When STN stimulation was switched on at the best of the levodopa induced effect, no further improvement was observed. The UPDRS motor score was significantly (p < 0.001) decreased after both stimulation and levodopa. In conclusion, STN stimulation is effective on parkinsonian gait.     

脑深部电刺激治疗帕金森病的长期随访研究

目的长期随访一组采用双侧脑深部电刺激(DBS)丘脑底核(STN)的帕金森(PD)病人,为临床研究提供参考。方法 195例PD病人在我院接受了双侧STN-DBS手术。术中采用微电极记录STN的外放电信号,刺激电极测试病人症状改善情况及副反应阈值。分别在术前术后1年、3年和5年采用UPDRS评分评估PD病人"开/关"两种状态下的症状改善程度。结果术前对照,PD病人术后5年"关"状态运动评分改善率为60.3%;日常生活评分的改善率为54.2%。语言是运动评分中唯一没有改善的症状。异动症除外,术后1年"开"状态下运动评分没有显著改善。第1年和第5年"开"状态下运动迟缓、姿势障碍和步僵症状较术前均有加重。术后第5年异动症较术前明显改善。结论 PD病人双侧STN-DBS术后长期随访结果表明,"关"状态下运动评分和"开"状态下异动症均明显改善。术后第1年和第5年比较,行动迟缓、语言、姿势异常、步僵和认知功能的障碍均有加重。     

Chronic subthalamic nucleus stimulation reduces medication requirements in Parkinson's disease.

OBJECTIVE: To reduce antiparkinsonian medication in parkinsonian patients with bilateral high frequency subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation. BACKGROUND: Parkinsonian syndromes are characterized by hyperactivity of the STN. Preliminary data indicate that functional inactivation of the STN may reduce the requirement for dopaminergic therapy in PD. METHODS: Bilateral quadripolar leads were implanted stereotactically in the STN of seven patients with advanced PD (mean age, 57.4 years; mean disease duration, 15.4 years). High-frequency stimulation was applied for 24 hours a day. Following implantation, antiparkinsonian medication was reduced to the minimum possible and stimulation was gradually increased. The patients were evaluated in the practically defined "off" and "on" conditions using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and the Schwab & England scale. The average follow-up was 16.3+/-7.6 months. A battery of neuropsychological tests was applied before and 9 months after the implant. RESULTS: Parkinsonian features improved in all patients--the greatest change seen in rigidity, then tremor, followed by bradykinesia. Compared with the presurgical condition, off-drug UPDRS motor scores improved by 41.9% on the last visit (p = 0.0002), UPDRS activities of daily living (ADL) scores improved by 52.2% (p = 0.0002), and the Schwab & England scale score improved by 213% (p = 0.0002). The levodopa-equivalent daily dose was reduced by 65%. Night sleep improved in all patients due to increased mobility at night, and in five patients insomnia was resolved. All patients gained weight after surgery and their appetite increased. The mean weight gain at the last follow-up was 13% compared with before surgery. During the last visit, the stimulation amplitude was 2.9+/-0.5 V and the total energy delivered per patient averaged 2.7+/-1.4 W x10(-6). The results of patient self-assessment scales indicated a marked improvement in five patients and a moderate improvement in the other two. The neuropsychological data showed no changes. Side effects were mild and tolerable. In all cases, a tradeoff between the optimal voltage and the severity of side effects made it possible to control parkinsonian signs effectively. The most marked side effects directly related to STN stimulation consisted of ballistic or choreic dyskinesias of the neck and the limbs elicited by contralateral STN stimulation above a given threshold voltage, which varied depending on the individual. CONCLUSIONS: Parkinsonian signs can be controlled by bilateral high-frequency STN stimulation. The procedure is well tolerated. On-state dyskinesias were greatly reduced, probably due to the reduction of total antiparkinsonian medication. Bilateral high-frequency STN stimulation compensated for drug reduction and elicited dyskinesias, which differ from those observed following dopaminergic medication. ADL improved significantly, suggesting that some motor tasks performed during everyday chores, and that are not taken into account in the UPDRS motor score, also improved.     

Effect of high‐frequency subthalamic neurostimulation on gait and freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

The aim of this meta‐analysis was to summarize the short‐ and long‐term effects of bilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN‐DBS) on gait and freezing of gait (FOG) in Parkinson's disease and to detect predictors of post‐stimulation outcome. A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted up to October 2015 using Medline Ovid databases for studies analyzing the effect of bilateral STN‐DBS on FOG and/or gait. Sixteen studies with available data for the gait item (no. 29) of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and six studies with the FOG item (no. 14) were included. Data were summarized for the following follow‐up periods: 6–15, 24–48 and >48 months. For the medication (Med)‐Off/stimulation(Stim)‐On condition compared with baseline Med‐Off, STN‐DBS significantly improved gait on average from 2.43 to 0.96, 2.53 to 1.31 and 2.56 to 1.40 points at 6–15, 24–48 and >48 months, respectively (P < 0.05). Pre‐operative levodopa responsiveness of UPDRS‐III and Med‐Off severity of gait were the predictors of this beneficial effect. STN‐DBS significantly improved FOG for the Med‐Off/Stim‐On condition compared with baseline on average from 2.26 to 0.82, 2.43 to 1.13 and 2.48 to 1.38 points at 6–15, 24–48 and >48 months, respectively (P < 0.05). There was no significant effect in the Med‐On/Stim‐On condition. This meta‐analysis showed a robust improvement of gait and FOG by STN‐DBS for more than 4 years in the Med‐Off/Stim‐On condition. No beneficial effect was found for the On state of medication. Pre‐operative levodopa responsiveness of global motor performance (UPDRS‐III) is the strongest predictor of the effect of deep brain stimulation on gait.     

Clinical and economic results of bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND: High frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an alternative but expensive neurosurgical treatment for parkinsonian patients with levodopa induced motor complications. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety, clinical effects, quality of life, and economic cost of STN stimulation. METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicentre study in 95 consecutive Parkinson's disease (PD) patients receiving bilateral STN stimulation and assessed its effects over 12 months. A double blind randomised motor evaluation was carried out at 3 month follow up, and quality of life, self care ability, and predictive factors of outcome following surgery were assessed. The cost of PD was estimated over 6 months before and after surgery. RESULTS: The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score improved by 57% (p<0.0001) and activities of daily living improved by 48% (p<0.0001) at 12 month follow up. Double blind motor scoring improved by 51% at 3 month follow up (p<0.0001). The total PD Quality of Life Questionnaire (PDQL-37) score improved by 28% (p<0.001). The better the preoperative motor score after a levodopa challenge, the better the outcome after STN stimulation. Five patients developed an intracerebral haematoma during electrode implantation with permanent after effects in two. The 6 month costs of PD decreased from 10,087 euros before surgery to 1673 euros after surgery (p<0.0001) mainly because of the decrease in medication. These savings allowed a return on the procedure investment, estimated at 36,904 euros over 2.2 years. CONCLUSIONS: STN stimulation has good outcomes with relatively low risk and little cost burden in PD patients with levodopa induced motor complications.     

Impact of Subthalamic Nucleus Stimulation on Young‐Onset Parkinson's Disease

Objective. To clarify the efficacy of subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation in young‐onset Parkinson's disease (PD), we compared the effects of STN stimulation on the motor symptoms between young‐onset PD (YOPD) and late‐onset PD (LOPD). Methods. We analyzed the effects of STN stimulation on motor function and motor fluctuations in 15 patients with YOPD, and 113 patients with LOPD who underwent STN stimulation during the same period. The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) was evaluated during the on‐period and off‐period, which are defined as the times at which the motor symptoms are the best and worst during the daily active time with sustaining anti‐parkinsonian drugs. The dyskinesia severity rating scale (DSRS) also was employed to assess the severity of peak‐dose dyskinesia. We analyzed the changes in levodopa equivalent daily dose (LED), motor fluctuations, DSRS, and UPDRS part 3 score after STN stimulation, and compared the changes in each score between the two groups (YOPD vs. LOPD). Results. The LED was reduced, and the on‐off motor fluctuation index, dyskinesia rating scale score (on‐period), and UPDRS part 3 score (on‐ and off‐periods) were improved in both the YOPD and LOPD groups. The improvement rates of the UPDRS part 3 scores in both the on‐ and off‐periods in the YOPD group were superior to those in the LOPD group. The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that YOPD itself is the best responder to STN stimulation. Conclusions. STN stimulation can reduce the LED and improve motor fluctuations in patients with YOPD. The effects of STN stimulation on the motor symptoms of YOPD patients are superior to those in LOPD. The present findings suggest that YOPD patients suffering from several problems related to pharmacological therapy are probably good candidates for STN stimulation.     

Effect of bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation and dopatherapy on oral control in Parkinson's disease.

This study focuses on the speech organs of a parkinsonian patient who initially had been treated with levodopa for 13 years, and had become severely disabled by motor fluctuations. This patient has been treated with bilateral chronic stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for the last 2 years. Upper lip, lower lip and tongue force production were examined before surgery under off and on medication conditions, and 2 years after surgery under off and on stimulation conditions. We compared the effect of stimulation and dopatherapy on the speech organs. L-Dopa had a poor effect whereas bilateral stimulation improved oral control and speech intelligibility. These results suggest that STN stimulation influences speech organs in a different way from the dopaminergic system and similarly affects oral and limb motor systems.     

Motor features and response to oral levodopa in patients with Parkinson’s disease under continuous dopaminergic infusion or deep brain stimulation

Background: Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) and continuous dopaminergic infusions (jejunal levodopa or subcutaneous apomorphine) are indicated in complicated Parkinson’s disease (PD), although it remains unsettled how they compare to each other. Methods: We investigated the daytime motor condition in patients with advanced PD under monotherapy with jejunal levodopa, subcutaneous apomorphine, or STN DBS and also measured the motor changes produced by an additional standard morning dose of levodopa. Motor performance was assessed with the UPDRS‐III, hand taps, the AIMS dyskinesia score and patients’ diaries. Outcome measures were time to best motor ‘on’ after start of morning treatment, daytime variability of motor condition, motor scores. Results: The time to ‘on’ was longest in the jejunal levodopa group. DBS and jejunal levodopa treatments produced stable motor conditions without appreciable ‘off’ episodes. Continuous apomorphine infusion was associated with the worst motor scores (UPDRS‐III and taps) and the most frequent off‐states. Jejunal levodopa infusion was associated with the highest AIMS scores. Addition of a levodopa dose produced shortening of time to ‘on’ and a transient motor improvement in the jejunal levodopa group without increase in dyskinesias; in the DBS and apomorphine groups, there was an increase in dyskinesias without changes in UPDRS‐III or taps. Conclusions: STN DBS provided adequate trade‐off between motor improvement and dyskinesia control, although dyskinesias could be elicited by adding oral levodopa. Jejunal levodopa infusion produced adequate motor improvement with slow time to ‘on’ and moderate dyskinesias. Apomorphine infusion produced insufficient motor control and negligible dyskinesias.     

Axial parkinsonian symptoms can be improved: the role of levodopa and bilateral subthalamic stimulation

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of high frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) on axial symptoms occurring in advanced stages of Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: The efficacy of STN stimulation on total motor disability score (unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) part III) were evaluated in 10 patients with severe Parkinson's disease. The subscores were then studied separately for limb akinesia, rigidity, and tremor, which are known to respond to levodopa, and axial signs, including speech, neck rigidity, rising from a chair, posture, gait, and postural stability, which are known to respond less well to levodopa. Patients were clinically assessed in the "off" and "on" drug condition during a levodopa challenge test performed before surgical implantation of stimulation electrodes and repeated 6 months after surgery under continuous STN stimulation. A complementary score for axial symptoms from the "activities of daily living" (ADL)-that is, speech, swallowing, turning in bed, falling, walking, and freezing-was obtained from each patient's questionnaire (UPDRS, part II). RESULTS: Improvements in total motor disability score (62%), limb signs (62%), and axial signs (72%) obtained with STN stimulation were statistically comparable with those obtained with levodopa during the preoperative challenge (68%, 69%, and 59%, respectively). When levodopa and STN stimulation were combined there was a further improvement in total motor disability (80%) compared with preoperative levodopa administration. This consisted largely of an additional improvement in axial signs (84%) mainly for posture and postural stability, no further improvement in levodopa responsive signs being found. Axial symptoms from the ADL showed similar additional improvement when levodopa and STN stimulation were combined. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that bilateral STN stimulation improves most axial features of Parkinson's disease and that a synergistic effect can be obtained when stimulation is used in conjunction with levodopa treatment.     

Variance in effects of subthalamic nucleus stimulation]

Chronic stimulation of subthalamus nucleus (STN) is effective in treating severe motor fluctuation and levodopa induced dyskinesia as well as parkinsonian motor symptoms. The improvement of peak-dose/diphasic dyskinesias of STN stimulation is considered to be due to the decrease in the daily dosage of antiparkinsonian drugs. However one report pointed out that STN stimulation improved directly levodopa induced dyskinesia. Moreover the timing of the improvement for levodopa induced dyskinesia is not yet obvious. In the present study, we have assessed variance in the latency of improvement of levodopa induced dyskinesia due to STN stimulation. In addition, we would clarify an issue which cite of STN stimulation improved parkinsonian symptoms and motor complication (motor dyskinesias and motor fluctuation). We have studied seven patients diagnosed with advanced idiopathic Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations and levodopa induced dyskinesias. Before and after the implantation of stimulating electrode, patients were assessed by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale and % 'OFF' motor state. The dosage of the antiparkinsonian medication was not modified for one month prior to implantation. Following implantation, dosage of the medication and strength of stimulation was adjusted, if necessary. Symptoms of motor fluctuation and dyskinesia improved in all patients six month after surgery. The mean off-time duration and dyskinesia disability improved compared with presurgical conditions. However, the time course of the improvement of dyskinesias was not the same among patients. Contralateral limb dyskinesias in three patients improved immediately after the stimulation without modification of medication. In contrast, the stimulation worsened contralateral limb dyskinesias in other three patients immediately following the surgery. In two of the three patients, dyskinesias gradually improved within one month after surgery without reducing the dosage of medication. Dyskinesias of the other patient improved following a reduction in the dosage of medication one month after the surgery. Improvement of parkinsonian symptoms of the patients with longer latency of stimulation effect for dyskinesias was better than that of the patients with shorter latency. Stimulation cite of the former group appeared to locate more central than that of the latter group. Latency and strength of the effects of STN stimulation are variable.     

Quantitative assessments of the effect of bilateral subthalamic stimulation on multiple aspects of sensorimotor function for patients with Parkinson's disease

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is effective for the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease. Most studies have evaluated the effectiveness of DBS of the STN using clinical motor scores or simple timed tests of motor function. There have been few studies that quantitatively assessed the outcome of STN DBS using multiple testing paradigms. In the current study, 11 patients who had bilateral STN DBS were quantitatively evaluated under four conditions using gait, postural control, and gait initiation. The four conditions included the medication on/stimulation on (M_on/S_on), medication on/stimulation off (M_on/S_off), medication off/stimulation on (M_off/S_on), and medication off/stimulation off (M_off/S_off) conditions. DBS of the STN significantly increased walking speed with and without levodopa, but had no influence on the cadence. The addition of levodopa had a minimal additional effect on walking speed. The effect of STN DBS on gait initiation approached the significant level. The mean values of lateral body sway during quiet standing increased moderately with medication and/or DBS, but the changes were not statistically significant. Future studies need to determine whether or not there is a potential negative effect of STN DBS on the postural control.     

Bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation in advanced Parkinson’s disease

Objective To assess the long-term efficacy and safety of chronic bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods 36 consecutive patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease treated with bilateral stimulation of the STN were studied. Parkinsonian status was assessed preoperatively and at 1 and 3 years postoperatively using the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and neuropsychological evaluation in on and off-medication / on and off stimulation conditions. Results At 3 years follow-up, STN stimulation reduced the UPDRS motor score by 54.2 % compared to baseline in the off-medication conditions. Tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia, postural stability, and gait improved by 72.2 %, 62.4 %, 56.8 %, 40.5 % and 45.3 %, respectively. UPDRS part II scores were reduced by 41.4 %. The overall dopaminergic drugs dose was reduced by 48.6 % after surgery and four patients were no longer taking antiparkinsonian medication at three years. However, axial dopa-unresponsive signs worsened in some patients. The most frequent transient adverse event consisted in mood disorders in 23 patients. Conclusions Our data demonstrate that: 1) bilateral STN stimulation is relatively safe, improves the motor symptoms and drug-related motor complications of PD, and reduces the daily dosage of medication; 2) this benefit is sustained over time despite the occurrence of axial doparesistant signs in some patients.     

Stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease: a 5 year follow up

BACKGROUND: The short term benefits of bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in patients with advanced levodopa responsive Parkinson's disease (PD) are well documented, but long term benefits are still uncertain. OBJECTIVES: This study provides a 5 year follow up of PD patients treated with stimulation of the STN. METHODS: Thirty seven consecutive patients with PD treated with bilateral STN stimulation were assessed prospectively 6, 24, and 60 months after neurosurgery. Parkinsonian motor disability was evaluated with and without levodopa treatment, with and without bilateral STN stimulation. Neuropsychological and mood assessments included the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale, the frontal score, and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). RESULTS: No severe peri- or immediate postoperative side effects were observed. Six patients died and one was lost to follow up. Five years after neurosurgery: (i) activity of daily living (Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) II) was improved by stimulation of the STN by 40% ("off" drug) and 60% ("on" drug); (ii) parkinsonian motor disability (UPDRS III) was improved by 54% ("off" drug) and 73% ("on" drug); (iii) the severity of levodopa related motor complications was decreased by 67% and the levodopa daily doses were reduced by 58%. The MADRS was unchanged, but cognitive performance declined significantly. Persisting adverse effects included eyelid opening apraxia, weight gain, addiction to levodopa treatment, hypomania and disinhibition, depression, dysarthria, dyskinesias, and apathy. CONCLUSIONS: Despite moderate motor and cognitive decline, probably due to disease progression, the marked improvement in motor function observed postoperatively was sustained 5 years after neurosurgery.     

Adverse effects of subthalamic nucleus DBS in a patient with multiple system atrophy

A 59-year-old woman with levodopa-responsive parkinsonism complicated by motor fluctuations and generalized levodopa dyskinesia underwent bilateral subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) 7 years after symptom onset. DBS improved levodopa-responsive upper extremity bradykinesia but aggravated speech, swallowing, and gait. Motor fluctuations were not improved and levodopa dose remained unchanged. Pulse generators were turned off. Clinical features and brain MRI in this case were indicative of multiple system atrophy (MSA). STN DBS is not recommended for patients with MSA.     

Transient gender-related effects in Parkinson’s disease patients with subthalamic stimulation

Little is known about the gender-related long-term efficacy and safety after subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) implant for Parkinson’s disease (PD), although some differences could be expected as recently stated in a short-term report. We assessed the possible gender-related differences in clinical outcome and disease progression along a 5-year period after STN DBS for PD. A prospective cohort of PD patients who underwent STN DBS and reached the 5-year follow-up (FU) was considered. Clinical outcome, disease progression and side effects were assessed at baseline and 1, 3, and 5 years after surgery. Eleven men and nine women were included in the study. At baseline, no inter-gender difference of age at implant, disease duration and severity or levodopa responsiveness was detected. A higher motor responsiveness in men compared to women was detected only at 1-year FU: this difference was mainly related to worse lower limb akinesia and gait score in women. The difference was not confirmed at 3 and 5 years. Antiparkinsonian drugs reduction, improvement in motor fluctuations and dyskinesias, functional measures and progression of underlying PD, were comparable in both groups. Women had persistent adverse events comparable to men. The present long-term observation confirms the occurrence of slight gender-related differences in PD patients treated with STN DBS, indicating a transient poorer outcome in women. Further observational time and a wider number of patients are needed to better analyze the dimension of long-term gender-related differences.     

Subthalamic nucleus stimulation in tremor dominant parkinsonian patients with previous thalamic surgery

Before the introduction of high frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN), many disabled tremor dominant parkinsonian patients underwent lesioning or chronic electrical stimulation of the thalamus. We studied the effects of STN stimulation in patients with previous ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) surgery whose motor state worsened. Fifteen parkinsonian patients were included in this study: nine with unilateral and two with bilateral VIM stimulation, three with unilateral thalamotomy, and one with both unilateral thalamotomy and contralateral VIM stimulation. The clinical evaluation consisted of a formal motor assessment using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and neuropsychological tests encompassing a 50 point frontal scale, the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale, and the Beck Depression Inventory. The first surgical procedure was performed a mean (SD) of 8 (5) years after the onset of disease. STN implantation was carried out 10 (4) years later, and duration of follow up after beginning STN stimulation was 24 (20) months. The UPDRS motor score, tremor score, difficulties in performance of activities of daily living, and levodopa equivalent daily dose significantly decreased after STN stimulation. Neither axial symptoms nor neuropsychological status significantly worsened after the implantation of the STN electrodes. The parkinsonian motor state is greatly improved by bilateral STN stimulation even in patients with previous thalamic surgery, and STN stimulation is more effective than VIM stimulation in tremor dominant parkinsonian patients.     

Apraxia of eyelid opening after subthalamic deep brain stimulation may be caused by reduction of levodopa

Apraxia of eyelid opening (ALO) is an infrequent side effect of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the pathogenesis of ALO after STN DBS is not well understood. We report on two patients who suffered from disabling ALO after bilateral STN DBS. Their ALO improved by resuming the levodopa medication that had been discontinued after the surgery. Although ALO after STN DBS is considered as an adverse effect of STN stimulation, postoperative modification of dopaminergic medication may be a cause of ALO after STN DBS.     

Predictive factors of speech intelligibility following subthalamic nucleus stimulation in consecutive patients with Parkinson's disease

Speech changes after bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN‐DBS) can be variable, with the majority of patients experiencing speech deterioration over time. The aim of this study was to describe the perceptual characteristics of speech following chronic STN‐DBS and to analyze clinical and surgical factors that could predict speech change. Fifty‐four consecutive patients (34 men; mean age ± standard deviation (SD), 58.8 ± 6.3 years; mean ± SD disease duration, 12.5 ± 4.7 years; mean ± SD levodopa equivalent, 1556 ± 671 mg/day; mean ± SD Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor part (UPDRS‐III) off‐medication score, 48.1 ± 17.9 [range, 20‐89]; and mean ± SD UPDRS‐III on‐medication score, 12.4 ± 7.8 [range, 2‐31]) participated in this study. They were assessed before and at 1 year after surgery using the Assessment of Intelligibility for the Dysarthric Speech, the perceptual scale from Darley et al., and the UPDRS‐III. Speech intelligibility deteriorated on average by 14.4% (P = 0.0006) after 1 year of STN‐DBS when off‐medication and by 12.3% (P = 0.001) when on‐medication. The effect on speech was not linked to age at surgery, unlike the effect on motor outcome. The most significant predictive factors for deterioration of speech intelligibility when patients were off‐medication/on‐stimulation were lower preoperative speech intelligibility on‐medication, longer disease duration, and medially placed left hemisphere active electrode contact. Speech change after STN‐DBS is variable and multifactorial. Consistent preoperative speech evaluation would help inform patients about the possible effects of surgery. Appropriate consideration of speech deficits might assist surgical targeting, particularly of the left electrode. © 2014 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society     

Stimulation cérébrale profonde et troubles de la marche dans la maladie de Parkinson

Introduction

Gait disorders and freezing of gait (FOG) are seen in most patients with advanced Parkinson disease. Response to levodopa and deep brain stimulation is variable across patients.

State of art

Thalamic stimulation is ineffective on gait and can even worsen balance when bilaterally applied. Pallidal stimulation moderately improves gait disorders and FOG although this effect tends to wane after three to five years. Stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) improves levodopa-responsive gait disorders and FOG. However, some patients worsen after STN stimulation and others are better improved under levodopa than under STN stimulation. Synergistic effects of the two treatments have been reported. As for pallidal stimulation, there is a failure of long-term STN stimulation to improve gait, probably due to the involvement of non-dopaminergic pathways as the disease progresses. Levodopa-resistant gait disorders and FOG do not usually benefit from STN stimulation. In the rare cases of levodopa-induced FOG, STN stimulation may be indirectly effective, as it enables reduction or arrest of the levodopa treatment.

Perspectives

Pedunculopontine nucleus stimulation has recently been performed in small groups of patients with disabling gait disorders and FOG. Although encouraging, the first results need to be confirmed by controlled studies involving larger series of patients.

Conclusions

Overall, gait disorders remain a motor PD symptom that is little improved, or only temporarily, by current pharmacological and surgical treatments. Patient management is complex.