‘Bourdieu’, medical elites and ‘social class’: a qualitative study of ‘desert island’ doctors

Sociologists of professions draw on Weberian theories of closure. However they have tended to ignore Bourdieu's work, which rejects Weberian notions of class and status groups as distinct ideal types and sees these concepts as inextricably linked. Bourdieu emphasises the importance of a class‐based habitus which generates orientations, inclinations and dispositions that organise practices and the perception of practice. For Bourdieu, because individuals perceive one another primarily through the status that attaches to their practices (through a symbolic veil of honour) they fail to perceive the real basis of these practices: the forms of capital that underlie the different habitus and enable their realisation. This article draws on interviews with 17 elite doctors appearing on a national (UK) radio show during which they choose eight discs to take to a desert island. According to Bourdieu, ‘nothing more clearly affirms one's “class”, nothing more infallibly classifies, than one's taste in music’. An analysis of the doctors' musical tastes and their mode of acquisition (largely, for these elites, via their family and education at independent schools), as well as other insights into their cultural capital reveals the importance of linking class and status when exploring professional status and prestige.     

Psychotropics,sociology and women: are the ‘halcyon days’ of the ‘malestream’ over?

The purpose of this paper is to lay the foundation for the development of a gender-sensitive perspective on psychotropic drug use. This paper reviews existing research on psychotropic drug use and highlights gender biases in three ways. First, a review of the early work on gender differences in tranquilliser use reveals how ‘one-dimensional’ accounts are offered by proponents who are either ‘no-objections’, ‘cautious-no- answer’, ‘women's-role’ or ‘political’ advocates. Second, with special reference to women, a critical review of the two predominant discourses, the medical and the sociological, are outlined. It is argued that they have a common approach that makes women's drug use invisible. The paper concludes that the approach prevailing in current research is individualistic and gender blind and needs to be complemented with an analysis that problematises gender.