Combined endoscopic mucosal resection and photodynamic therapy for esophageal neoplasia within Barrett's esophagus.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and photodynamic therapy have been proposed as treatments for early stage cancers. EMR is limited by its focal nature whereas photodynamic therapy is dependent on precise staging. The combination of EMR and photodynamic therapy were studied in the treatment of superficial cancer in patients with Barrett's esophagus. METHODS: Seventeen consecutive nonsurgical patients with superficial cancers underwent EMR followed by photodynamic therapy with a porphyrin photosensitizer. Photoradiation was performed at 630 nm for a total dose of 200 J/cm of diffuser. RESULTS: Seventeen patients (15 men; mean age 69 +/- 13 years) underwent EMR. The mean diameter of mucosal resection was 1 cm. The margins were involved by cancer in 3 cases. EMR improved staging in 8 patients (47%). Sixteen (94%) patients remained in remission (median follow-up 13 months). Complications included minor bleeding after EMR in 1 patient (6%), stricture in 5 (30%), cutaneous phototoxicity in 2 (12%), and supraventricular tachycardia in 1 patient (6%). CONCLUSIONS: Combined EMR and photodynamic therapy appears to be an effective and safe therapy for superficial esophageal cancer within Barrett's esophagus. This combination improves cancer staging, removes the superficial cancer, and eliminates remaining mucosa at risk for cancer development.     

Combined endoscopic mucosal resection and photodynamic therapy versus esophagectomy for management of early adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although esophagectomy is the standard of care for treating early adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus, the procedure is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. For these patients, the multimodal approach of endoscopic mucosal resection and photodynamic therapy (EMR/PDT) may be a viable, less invasive option. METHODS: A retrospective review (1996-2001) of all patients undergoing either combined EMR/PDT group or esophagectomy (SURG) for early-stage Barrett's adenocarcinoma was performed. Data were collected on patient demographics, tumor staging, procedure-related morbidity and mortality, persistence or recurrence of cancer, and cancer-related deaths after therapy. Differences in outcomes between the 2 groups were assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were identified in the EMR/PDT group and 64 in the SURG group. The SURG group was found to have a significantly higher procedure-related complication rate compared with the EMR/PDT group (31 vs. 4; P < 0.01). There were no procedure-related deaths in the EMR/PDT group, whereas one death occurred in the SURG group as a result of complications. Eighty-three percent of patients (20 of 24) in the EMR/PDT group and all patients in the SURG group remained free of cancer over a follow-up of 12 +/- 2 and 19 +/- 3 months, respectively. Four patients in the EMR/PDT group failed to respond to therapy; 2 of them underwent alternate therapies and are free of disease, whereas the other 2 died of unrelated causes. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of EMR/PDT seems to be a viable and less morbid alternative to standard esophagectomy in patients presenting with early Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma. A prospective randomized, controlled trial of EMR/PDT compared with esophagectomy for managing early adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus may be warranted.     

Histologic evaluation of resection specimens obtained at 293 endoscopic resections in Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based selection criteria for endoscopic resection (ER) of Barrett's neoplasia are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To study the histopathology of ER specimens of Barrett's neoplasia and correlate this with endoscopic characteristics to make recommendations for patient management. DESIGN, SETTING, INTERVENTIONS: Histology and correlating endoscopy reports of specimens obtained at 293 consecutive ERs performed at a Dutch tertiary referral center between 2000 and 2006 were reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Histologic findings in ER specimens and their relation with endoscopic characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 150 ERs were performed for focal lesions: 16% type 0-I, 23% 0-IIa, 7% 0-IIb, 3% 0-IIc, 9% 0-IIa-IIb, and 42% 0-IIa-IIc; and 143 for flat mucosa. Histology revealed no dysplasia in 57 ERs, low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia in 52, high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia in 104, T1m in 61, and T1sm in 17; in two cancers, infiltration depth was not assessable because of artifacts. Type 0-I and 0-IIc lesions significantly more often penetrated the submucosa (P = .009): 60% were G1 cancers, 23% were G2 cancers, and 18% were G3 cancers. G2-G3 cancers significantly more often invaded the submucosa (P < .001) or had positive vertical margins (P = .015). Histology of ER specimens led to a change in diagnosis in 49% of the focal lesions and a relevant change in treatment policy in 30%. LIMITATIONS: A retrospective study. CONCLUSIONS: ER is a valuable diagnostic tool that frequently leads to a change in treatment policy. Most endoscopically resected early Barrett's neoplasia are 0-II type, G1 mucosal neoplasia. Submucosal infiltration is more often encountered in type 0-I and 0-IIc lesions and in G2-G3 cancers.     

Significance of neoplastic involvement of margins obtained by endoscopic mucosal resection in Barrett's esophagus

OBJECTIVES: Although EMR has been used for elimination of neoplasia in BE, the significance of positive carcinoma margins and depth of invasion on endoscopic resection pathology has not been assessed using a valid standard. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of tumor staging by EMR using esophagectomy as the standard. METHODS: Medical records of patients, who underwent endoscopic resection for esophageal carcinoma or high-grade dysplasia in BE followed by esophagectomy, were reviewed. Data were abstracted from a prospectively maintained EMR database. Endosonography and endoscopic resection were performed by a single experienced endoscopist. Two experienced GI pathologists interpreted all histological results. Standard statistical tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were included in the study. Three patients had mucosal carcinoma and 16 had submucosal carcinoma following endoscopic resection. Surgical pathology staging was consistent with preoperative EMR staging in all patients. No patient with negative mucosal resection margins had residual tumor at the resection site at esophagectomy. In patients with submucosal carcinoma, 8 had residual carcinoma at the EMR site at surgery and 5 patients had metastatic lymphadenopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor staging using EMR pathology is accurate when compared with surgical pathology following esophagectomy. Negative margins on EMR pathology correlate with absence of residual disease at the EMR site at esophagectomy. Submucosal carcinoma on EMR specimens was associated with a high prevalence of residual disease at surgery (50%) and metastatic lymphadenopathy (31%).     

内镜下食管黏膜切除术的麻醉方法比较

目的比较早期食管癌及癌前病变内镜下食管黏膜切除术中2种静脉麻醉的应用效果及安全性。方法140例早期食管癌及癌前病变行内镜下食管黏膜切除术的患者,随机分为2组,每组70例。I组为咪唑安定＋异丙酚,Ⅱ组为咪唑安定＋依托咪酯。观察比较2组患者手术过程中生命体征、麻醉效果、清醒时间及术中、术后不良反应。结果2种麻醉方式均能满足内镜治疗的需要。I组患者治疗过程中血压、心率较检查前有不同程度的下降;Ⅱ组患者治疗过程中血压、心率相对平稳,与检查前比较差异无统计学意义,与I组比较部分观察时点差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。2组患者血氧饱合度均在正常范围,苏醒时间差异无统计学意义。Ⅱ组患者肌震颤或阵挛发生率明显高于I组,心动过缓及低血压发生率低于I组,组间比较差异均有统计学意义（P均〈0．05）。少数患者术后有疼痛、恶心及头晕等不适,组间比较差异无统计学意义。结论异丙酚和依托咪酯麻醉均能满足消化内镜治疗的要求,使用依托咪酯麻醉的患者血流动力学更平稳。     

Endoscopic mucosal resection for early adenocarcinoma arising in Barrett's esophagus

A 58‐year‐old man was diagnosed to have an esophageal adenocarcinoma arising in Barrett's esophagus by screening examination at the previous hospital. Endoscopically, a slightly reddish elevated lesion with a central depressed component was detected in the Barrett's epithelium. Endoscopic ultrasonography showed the thickness of the second layer of the esophagus and no enlarged lymph node. Histological examination of a biopsy specimen revealed well or moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. From these findings, the lesion was diagnosed as a mucosal esophageal cancer, type IIa + IIc, arising in Barrett's esophagus. As he refused operation, the lesion was resected endoscopically with his informed consent. Histologically, the resected specimens showed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma arising in Barrett's esophagus. The adenocarcinoma had invaded the superficial muscularis mucosa, but was limited to the deep one with no vessel invasion. Barrett's esophagus often has a double muscularis mucosa. Connective tissues containing vascular and lymphatic vessels exist between them. However, one consideration is whether the existence of vessels between the double muscularis mucosa and the presence of vessel invasion are risk factors for metastasis. In order for a definitive indication for endoscopic mucosal resection, the frequency of lymph node and distant metastasis in cases of early Barrett's cancer needs to be investigated.     

Photodynamic therapy for mucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma and dysplastic Barrett's esophagus

Photodynamic therapy is a novel endoscopic technique that combines a photosensitizer and laser light to destroy target cells. Photodynamic therapy has been used in Europe, North Africa and Japan to treat esophageal neoplasms and dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. This paper summarizes the available published experience of photodynamic therapy for the treatment of each esophageal cancer and Barrett's esophagus. These studies suggest that photodynamic therapy is a promising modality for esophageal mucosal disease. More long-term studies, however, are needed to document the efficacy of photodynamic therapy in reducing the morbidity and mortality from esophageal cancer for patients with high-grade dysplasia and early adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus.     

Endoscopic mucosal resection for lesions with endoscopic features suggestive of malignancy and high-grade dysplasia within Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic mucosal resection has been used in the treatment of superficial squamous cell cancers and gastric malignancies. Our aim was to determine whether endoscopic mucosal resection can be used in the diagnosis of lesions within Barrett's esophagus whose endoscopic appearances raise suspicion of carcinoma or high-grade dysplasia. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with such lesions within Barrett's esophagus underwent endoscopic mucosal resection for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. All patients underwent endoscopic ultrasound to determine the feasibility of endoscopic resection. Only lesions found to be uT0 or uT1 underwent EMR. The lift and cut technique was used in 23 patients and a variceal ligating device was used on 2 patients. RESULTS: Endoscopic mucosal resection was performed because of a nodule or polyp within Barrett's esophagus in 11 patients (44%) and suspected superficial cancer or high-grade dysplasia in 14 patients (56%). Endoscopic mucosal resection diagnosed superficial adenocarcinoma in 13 patients (52%) and high-grade dysplasia in 4 (16%); it confirmed lesions in 8 patients (40%) to be of lower neoplastic risk. No complications occurred due to the procedure itself. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic mucosal resection is a technique with low morbidity and mortality. It has led to a change in diagnosis in patients with Barrett's esophagus and lesions with endoscopic features that suggest neoplasia. Its major advantages include simplicity and retrieval of the specimen en bloc.     

Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Barrett's esophagus is a condition in which the normal stratified squamous epithelium is replaced by a specialized metaplastic columnar epithelium. It develops as a consequence of chronic gastroesophageal reflux and predisposes to the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Adenocarcinoma develops in Barrett's esophagus by a multistep process in which specialized metaplasia progresses to dysplasia, then to early adenocarcinoma, and eventually to deeply invasive and metastatic disease. This neoplastic progression is associated with a process of genomic instability that generates abnormal clones of cells, some of which have aneuploid or increased G2/tetraploid DNA content. A systematic protocol of endoscopic biopsy can detect Barrett's adenocarcinomas at an early stage, when they may be curable.     

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the esophagus treated by endoscopic mucosal resection

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma is a mixed cell tumor with both adenocarcinomatous and squamous components. We report a rare case of superficial mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the esophagus with mucosal gastric cancer. Endoscopic mucosal resection was performed on a 67-year-old man with a slight but defined depressed lesion of the thoracic esophagus and two lesions of mucosal gastric cancer. Histological examination revealed that the lesion of the esophagus was a mucoepidermoid carcinoma and the two lesions of the stomach were well-differentiated adenocarcinoma. Since the mucoepidermoid carcinoma had only slightly invaded the submucosal layer, it was thought to arise from the ductal epithelium of the esophageal gland or the stratified squamous epithelium of the esophagus. Radiation therapy with a total dose of 60 Gy was performed and there has been no recurrence or metastasis to other organs during 36 months of follow-up.     

Endoscopic mucosal resection of early cancer and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND & AIMS: In view of the mortality and morbidity rates of esophagectomy and the relatively large group of inoperable patients, local therapeutic techniques are required for high-grade dysplasia and early Barrett's cancer. METHODS: A prospective investigation of endoscopic mucosal resection was conducted in 64 patients (mean age, 65 +/- 10 years) who had early carcinoma (61 patients) or high-grade dysplasia (3 patients) in Barrett's esophagus. Thirty-five patients met the criteria for low risk: macroscopic types I, IIa, IIb, and IIc; lesion diameter up to 20 mm; mucosal lesion; and histological grades G1 and G2 and/or high-grade dysplasia (group A). The remaining 29 patients were included in group B (high risk). RESULTS: A total of 120 resections were performed, with no technical problems encountered. The mean number of treatment sessions per patient was 1. 3 +/- 0.6 in group A and 2.8 +/- 2.0 in group B (P < 0.0005). Only one major complication occurred, a case of spurting bleeding, which was managed endoscopically. Complete local remission was achieved significantly earlier (P = 0.008) in group A than in group B. In May 1999, complete remission had been achieved in 97% of the patients in group A and in 59% of those in group B; however, 1 patient in group A and 9 in group B are still undergoing treatment or awaiting the first check-up. During a mean follow-up of 12 +/- 8 months, recurrent or metachronous carcinomas were found in 14%. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic mucosal resection of early carcinoma in Barrett's esophagus is associated with promisingly low morbidity and mortality rates. The procedure may offer a new minimally invasive therapeutic alternative to esophagectomy, especially in low-risk situations. Comparisons with surgical results will need to be done when the long-term results of this procedure become available.     

Barrett's esophagus. Update of the endoscopic treatment

Actual Barrett's esophagus management includes symptomatic approach for GERD in order to prevent erosive injury and endoscopic & histologycal surveillance to detect dysplasia and early cancer. In high-grade dysplasia and superficial carcinoma, less aggressive procedures has been attempted to avoid extended surgery, such as Argon Plasma Coagulator, Multipolar Coagulation, Heater Probe, Photodynamic Therapy, and recently radiofrequency local treatment, associated or not to antireflux surgery. Ultrasonic therapy and Cryotherapy are new approaches, which are under clinical investigation. Barrett's epithelium resection utilizing endoscopical mucosal resection is a new promising procedure, which comes to the arena, allowing besides the compromised epithelium removal, its complete pathological evaluation and probably a curative intent. The actual revision intents to discuss the results of the different alternatives at the platform of treatment in dysplastic Barrett's or early carcinoma growing in the Barrett's epithelium.     

Impact of esophageal acid exposure on the endoscopic reversal of Barrett's esophagus

OBJECTIVE: Normalization of esophageal acid exposure had been assumed to be necessary for the reversal of Barrett's esophagus with endoscopic therapy. This assumption is examined by evaluating the esophageal pH in a group of patients undergoing reversal therapy with fixed high-dose proton pump inhibitor therapy and endoscopic multipolar electrocoagulation (MPEC). METHODS: Patients with Barrett's esophagus of 2-6 cm in length were treated with omeprazole (40 mg b.i.d.). They underwent 24-h esophageal pH monitoring 5 cm above the upper margin of the lower esophageal sphincter determined by a water-perfused catheter. They then underwent MPEC therapy to an endpoint of elimination of Barrett's (reversal) by both endoscopy and biopsy 6 months after the last MPEC session or failure to achieve visual (endoscopic) reversal after six treatment sessions. RESULTS: Twenty patients had 24-h pH testing and reached a reversal endpoint. Three patients had abnormal pH tests, two total and supine and one supine only. These patients had documented reversal. The remaining 17 patients had normal pH testing but five failed reversal therapy. CONCLUSION: Barrett's esophagus can be completely reversed with endoscopic therapy despite abnormal esophageal acid exposure. Also, patients can fail reversal even with normal esophageal acid exposure. The necessary reduction of esophageal acid exposure for reversal therapy has yet to be defined.