The effect of the addition of ropivacaine or bupivacaine upon pruritus induced by intrathecal fentanyl in labour

Sixty patients in early labour were randomly allocated to one of three groups. The control group received intrathecal fentanyl 25 microg, the ropivacaine group received intrathecal fentanyl 25 microg and ropivacaine 2.5 mg while the bupivacaine group received intrathecal fentanyl 25 microg and bupivacaine 2.5 mg. The incidence of pruritus was 100% in controls, compared with 85% in the ropivacaine group (not significant) and 75% in the bupivacaine group (p = 0.003). The severity of pruritus was significantly less in the ropivacaine (p = 0.006) and bupivacaine (p = 0.001) groups. Most patients developed pruritus by 30 min. Pruritus above the abdomen was not reduced in patients receiving local anaesthetics. There were no significant differences in the mean pain visual analogue score, systolic blood pressure, maternal heart rate and upper level of reduced pin-prick sensation in the first 30 min. Intrathecal ropivacaine and, more so, intrathecal bupivacaine reduce the incidence and severity of pruritus from intrathecal fentanyl for labour analgesia.     

The use of ondansetron to treat pruritus associated with intrathecal morphine in two paediatric patients

Intrathecal morphine is an effective technique for providing postoperative analgesia after major surgical procedures in children. Pruritus is a common side effect associated with intrathecal morphine. We report two patients who experienced significant pruritus associated with intrathecal morphine administration and were successfully treated with ondansetron. Ondansetron appears to be a beneficial and safe method of relieving pruritus associated with intrathecal morphine.     

Ondansetron and tropisetron do not prevent intraspinal morphine- and fentanyl-induced pruritus in elective cesarean delivery

BACKGROUND: Although intraspinal morphine has been shown to be effective in providing analgesia after cesarean delivery, pruritus as a side-effect remains a common cause of dissatisfaction. The role of ondansetron has been studied in preventing pruritus but the results have been contradictory. METHODS: We randomized 98 parturients undergoing elective cesarean section using combined spinal-epidural anesthesia into a double-blinded trial to receive tropisetron 5 mg (T group) or ondansetron 8 mg (O group) or placebo (NaCl group) after delivery, when intrathecal morphine 160 microg and fentanyl 15 microg were used for post-operative pain control. The patients additionally received ketoprofen 300 mg per day. Post-operative itching, nausea and vomiting, sedation and need for rescue analgesics were registered every 3 h up to 24 h, and all patients were interviewed on the first post-operative day. RESULTS: Seventy-six percent of the parturients in the placebo group, 87% in the ondansetron, and 79% in the tropisetron group had itching. The incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting was 21%, 20% and 11% of the patients in the placebo, ondansetron and tropisetron groups, respectively. Medication for pruritus was needed by 31%, 23% and 39% of the patients in the placebo, ondansetron and tropisetron groups, respectively. In the post-operative questionnaire, the patients reported less post-operative nausea in the tropisetron group than in the placebo group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Neither ondansetron nor tropisetron prevent itching caused by intrathecal morphine with fentanyl. However, tropisetron reduced post-operative nausea.     

Low-dose bupivacaine spinal anaesthesia for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: the suitability and impact of adding intrathecal fentanyl

BACKGROUND: Unilateral spinal anaesthesia has been used for lower limb surgery with a stable cardiovascular state and a short recovery unit stay. We sought to test the suitability of low-dose bupivacaine spinal anaesthesia for percutaneous nephrolithotomy, a procedure hitherto performed under general anaesthesia. Furthermore, we hypothesized that adding intrathecal fentanyl to bupivacaine may improve the quality of anaesthesia. METHODS: We randomly allocated, through computer-generated randomization, 108 patients subjected to percutaneous nephrolithotomy to receive either 7.5 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 5 mg/ml alone or with the addition of 10 microg of fentanyl. Drugs were given at the L(2)-L(3) interspace with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. The patients remained in this position for 10 min, after which the sensory and motor blocks were assessed. Intra-operative analgesic supplementation, when deemed necessary, was achieved with intravenous fentanyl boluses (25 microg). RESULTS: The sensory and motor blocks after intrathecal bupivacaine and bupivacaine-fentanyl were similar. Sensory block, in both groups, reached the fifth and eighth thoracic dermatomes on the operative and non-operative sides, respectively. Deep motor block occurred on the operative side in all patients and in nearly 50% of patients on the non-operative side. The patients in the bupivacaine-fentanyl group required less intra-operative and post-operative analgesics, and both patients and endoscopists were better satisfied. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated, for the first time, that intrathecal low-dose bupivacaine and fentanyl offers a reliable neuraxial block for patients subjected to percutaneous nephrolithotomy, with stable haemodynamics, good post-operative analgesia and acceptable patient and endoscopist satisfaction.     

Effects of intrathecal fentanyl on quality of spinal anesthesia in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair

Background: The effect of intrathecal fentanyl on the characteristics of spinal anesthesia has not been investigated in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the incidence and severity of pain during peritoneal sac traction is decreased by addition of fentanyl to bupivacaine in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair with spinal anesthesia. Methods: Children (6–14 years) were randomized into two groups. Group F (n = 25): hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.2 μg·kg⁻¹ of fentanyl. Group P (n = 25): hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.9% NaCl (placebo). The dose of bupivacaine was 0.4 mg·kg⁻¹. The primary variable was the incidence and severity of pain during peritoneal sac traction. Spinal block characteristics, duration of spinal anesthesia assessed by recovery of hip flexion and duration of analgesia were the secondary variables measured, and the side effects were noted. Results: There were significant differences in incidence of pain and pain scores during sac traction with lower incidence and scores in the fentanyl group (P = 0.009). Two groups were similar regarding the level of sensory block during sac traction and duration of spinal anesthesia. Duration of spinal analgesia was prolonged significantly in the fentanyl group (P = 0.025). Conclusion: Intrathecal fentanyl at a dose of 0.2 μg·kg⁻¹ added to bupivacaine significantly improves the quality of intraoperative analgesia and prolongs postoperative analgesia in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair with spinal anesthesia.     

Low-dose bupivacaine plus fentanyl for spinal anesthesia during ambulatory inguinal herniorrhaphy: a comparison between 6 mg and 7. 5 mg of bupivacaine

BACKGROUND: Inguinal herniorrhaphy is commonly performed as an outpatient procedure. Spinal anesthesia offers some advantages over general anesthesia in this setting. METHODS: Forty patients were randomly divided into two groups according to a double-blind protocol: Group L had spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine 6.0 mg and Group H with bupivacaine 7.5 mg; in both groups, fentanyl 25 micro g was added to the spinal anesthetic. The sensory block was measured by 'pin-prick' and the motor block was evaluated by a modified Bromage scale. RESULTS: No differences were seen in the spread, duration and regression of sensory block between the groups on the operated side. A greater number of patients required analgesics during the operation in Group L (6) compared with Group H (1) (P<0.05). The return of the modified Bromage scale to grade 0 was earlier in Group L than in Group H (P<0.05) but the time to mobilization and discharge was similar. Seven patients (17%) needed to be catheterized and two had the catheter retained overnight. Times to home discharge (median) were 350 and 445 min, respectively, in Groups L and H. Postoperatively and during the first week, visual analog pain scores, analgesic requirements and side-effects were similar between the groups. In Group H, 95% of the patients and in Group L 85% would have the same anesthetic again if operated upon for a similar procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine 7.5 mg and fentanyl offers an alternative to general or local anesthesia for ambulatory inguinal herniorrhaphy. However, the long discharge times and risk for urinary retention restrict its routine use in all patients.     

Spinal anesthesia for arthroscopic knee surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to compare the effects of adding 50 microg of morphine, 25 microg of fentanyl or saline to 6 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine on postoperative analgesia and time to urination in patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery under spinal anesthesia. METHODS: The study was designed in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded and placebo-controlled manner. Sixty ASA I-II patients were randomized into the following three groups: Group BM: 6 mg of bupivacaine and 50 microg of morphine, Group BF: 6 mg of bupivacaine and 25 microg of fentanyl, and Group BS: 6 mg of bupivacaine and saline. Selective spinal anesthesia was performed in a lateral decubitus position, with the operative knee dependent for 10 min. RESULTS: In all groups satisfactory anesthesia was provided during the operation. There was a statistically significant difference between all the groups in times to voiding [Group BM 422 +/- 161 min; Group BF 244 +/- 163 min; Group BS 183 +/- 54 min (mean +/- SD)]. The incidence of pruritus was significantly greater in Group BM (80%) and BF (65%) in comparison with Group BS (no pruritus) (P < 0.05). The incidence of nausea was significantly increased in Group BM (35%) in comparison with Group BF (10%) and Group BS (P < 0.05). Analgesic consumption was significantly greater in Group BS in comparison with Groups BM and BF (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that during spinal anesthesia even mini-dose intrathecal morphine is not acceptable for outpatient surgery due to side-effects, especially severely prolonged time to urination.     

Dose-response study of intrathecal fentanyl added to bupivacaine in infants undergoing lower abdominal and urologic surgery

Background: Intrathecal (IT) adjuncts often are used to enhance the duration of spinal bupivacaine. Fentanyl is a spinal analgesic that could be a useful adjunct, and enhances the duration and quality of sensory block in adult surgical and obstetric population. However, no data exist to assess the dose–response characteristics of IT fentanyl when added to bupivacaine in infants. Methods: Fifty‐eight infants undergoing lower abdominal and urologic procedures were randomized into four groups to receive plain 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine F0 (<5 kg = 0.5 mg·kg^?1; 5–10 kg = 0.4 mg·kg^?1). Groups F0.25, F0.5, and F1 groups received bupivacaine added with 0.25, 0.5, and 1 μg·kg^?1 of fentanyl, respectively. Duration of spinal anesthesia (SA) as assessed by the recovery of hip flexion in the postoperative period was the primary variable analyzed. In addition, the duration of analgesia in the postoperative period, rescue postoperative analgesic requirements and hemodynamic changes were recorded. Results: Fifty‐six infants were studied. The four groups were similar for age, weight, duration of surgery, onset of sensory, motor block, and the highest level of analgesia attained. The addition of 1 μg·kg^?1 fentanyl (F1) significantly increased the duration of SA (74.27 ± 6.1 min) compared to the control group (51.21 ± 5.2 min) (P = 0.001). Postoperative pain‐free interval was prolonged (P = 0.004) and significantly less rescue analgesics were required after 1 μg·kg^?1 IT fentanyl (P = 0.032). These parameters did not show any significant difference among groups F0, F0.25, and F0.5. Conclusions: The addition of 1 μg·kg^?1 IT fentanyl to spinal bupivacaine prolonged the duration of spinal block in infants undergoing lower abdominal and urologic procedures.     

Betamethasone does not prevent nausea and vomiting induced by ipecacuanha

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids reduce the incidence of PONV but the mode of action is not known. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if betamethasone has serotonin (5-HT) antagonistic effects. Ipecacuanha is known to release serotonin and therefore it was used to induce nausea and vomiting. The 5-HT3 antagonist ondansetron was used as a control substance. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled study 10 healthy male and female volunteers (6 M/4F), mean age 19.5 (18-23) years, mean weight 69.7 (53-84) kg, were studied on three occasions separated by at least 1 week. They were randomly allocated to receive pretreatment with betamethasone 8 mg, ondansetron 8 mg, or normal saline 2 ml as placebo on each occasion, 15 min before oral ingestion of 30 ml of Ipecacuanha syrup. After ingestion of ipecacuanha, vomitings were recorded and the intensity of nausea was estimated with a visual analog scale during 2 h. RESULTS: During the first 2 h after ingestion of ipecacuanha nine of the 10 volunteers vomited both after betamethasone and placebo. No volunteer vomited after ondansetron (P < 0.01 vs. betamethasone and placebo). The max VAS for nausea was significantly higher after betamethasone and placebo compared to ondansetron (P < 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences of the max VAS for nausea between betamethasone and placebo. CONCLUSION: This study in volunteers has shown that betamethasone does not prevent nausea and vomiting induced by oral intake of ipecacuanha syrup. As ipecacuanha releases 5-hydroxytryptamin, it can be concluded that betamethasone does not have 5-HT3 antagonistic effects.     

芬太尼诱发呛咳的机制、影响因素和预防

芬太尼是人工合成的阿片类药物,具有镇痛作用强、作用时效中等、对血流动力学影响小等特点。但是,芬太尼静脉注射后常引起病人的呛咳反应,Lin等研究发现在2s内经外周静脉注射芬太尼2．5μg／kg的呛咳发生率为65％。呛咳常引起机体内环境瞬间发生剧烈变化,胸膜腔内压明显升高,影响静脉回流,脑脊液压力升高,可能导致严重的并发症。预防芬太尼诱发的呛咳反应,对提高病人麻醉安全具有重要意义。     

The influence of intrathecal fentanyl on the characteristics of subarachnoid block for Caesarean section

Forty healthy parturients scheduled for elective Caesarean section were randomly allocated to receive either 0.3 ml 0.9% saline (control group, n  = 20) or 15 μg (0.3 ml) fentanyl (treatment group, n  = 20) added to 2.5 ml 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine given intrathecally in the sitting position. A sensory block to T₄ was achieved after 6.5 min in those who received fentanyl compared to 8.0 min in the control group; this was not significantly different. The highest level of sensory block achieved in both groups was similar. Ephedrine was required earlier (p < 0.05) in those who received fentanyl but the total requirement of ephedrine intra-operatively was similar. Fentanyl significantly improved the quality of intra-operative surgical anaesthesia as none of the patients in the treatment group complained of discomfort compared with seven in the control group (p < 0.05). Similarly those in the treatment group had better comfort scores as evaluated by visual analogue score (p < 0.01). Regression of anaesthesia to T₁₂ took longer (184 vs 156 min, p < 0.05) in those who received fentanyl but this did not affect the total requirement of morphine in the first 24 h after operation. There was no difference in the incidence of side effects in the mother and no adverse effects were detected in the baby. The results indicate that adding 15 μg fentanyl to hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia markedly improves intra-operative anaesthesia for Caesarean section.     

Desmopressin acetate does not reduce blood loss during total hip replacement in patients receiving dextran

The blood loss-reducing effect of desmopressin during dextran therapy was studied in a double-blind fashion in 79 elderly but otherwise healthy patients with preoperative normal bleeding time undergoing total hip replacement for primary coxarthrosis. An infusion of desmopressin (0.3 μg/kg body weight) or placebo was randomly administered immediately after administration of spinal anaesthesia and six hours later. Haemostasis was evaluated on the basis of vWF: ristocetin cofactor activity, FVIII: C activity, human tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), plasminogen activator inhibitor type (PAI), ß-thromboglobuline (ßTG) and a clot impedance test (Sonoclot). There were no statistically significant differences ( P >0.05) in mean blood loss or transfusion requirements between the placebo and the desmopressin group. There was a significantly increase ( P <0.01) both in vWF: ristocetin cofactor and in FVIII: C activity after both infusions of desmopressin compared with placebo. There was no significant difference in ßTG, tPA, PAI or Sonoclot analysis between the groups. In conclusion, desmopressin did not reduce blood loss in patients undergoing total hip replacement.     

High-dose fentanyl does not suppress interleukin-1β-induced increases in plasma ACTH and corticosterone in rats

Background. High-dose fentanyl anesthesia is reported to attenuate the metabolic and endocrinal responses to surgery. Interleu-kin-1 (II-1) is one of the key mediators in the immunono-neuroendocrine system, and may be involved in the stress responses to surgery. We studied whether high-dose fentanyl may influence the II.-1β-induced alterations in plasma ACTH and corticosterone in rats.
Methods. Plasma ACTH, corticosterone, blood pressure, heart rate and acid-base status were determined in either awake or fentanyl-anesthetized animals immediately before and after either phosphate buffered saline or IL-1β administration. Fentanyl anesthesia was induced by bolus intravenous injections of fentanyl at 50 μg/kg and pancuronium bromide at 0.2 mg/kg, and maintained by continuous administrations of fentanyl at 100 or 200 μg·kg^-1·h^-1 and pancuronium bromide at 0.4 μg·k^-1·h^-1.
Results. In awake rats, IL-lβ at incremental doses of 0.25, 0.5 and 1 μg/kg increased plasma ACTH in a dose-dependent manner, but heat-inactivated IL-1β at 4 μkg did not influence plasma ACTH. A noxious stimulus with tail clamping for 30 min did not significantly alter plasma ACTH in fentanyl-anesthetized rats. Fentanyl reduced the basal plasma corticosterone, but it did not modulate the increases in plasma ACTH and corticosterone after the administration of IL-1β at 1 μg/kg. Fentanyl moderately increased the basal blood pressure and heart rate, but it moderately attenuated the IL-1β-induced elevations of blood pressure and heart rate. IL-1β moderately decreased PCO₂ in awake animals.
Conclusions. Fentanyl anesthesia, which is able to suppress the endocrine responses to noxious stimuli, does not attenuate the IL-1β-mediated activation of the pituitary-adrenal axis in rats.     

Needle design does not affect the success rate of spinal anaesthesia or the incidence of postpuncture complications in children

BACKGROUND: In adults, pencil-point spinal needles are believed to be less traumatic and therefore to be superior compared to cutting-point needles with respect to success rate and postpuncture complications. The aim of this randomised, parallel groups and prospective study was to record the success rate and to evaluate the incidence of complications following spinal anaesthesia with the two types of needles in children. METHODS: We studied 215 children aged 1 to 18 years. A 25-gauge needle was used in children up to 7 years (n=96) and a 27-gauge needle in older children (n=119). During lumbar puncture with either a cutting-point (n=109) or a pencil-point (n=106) spinal needle, we recorded puncture characteristics and the success of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) aspiration. Hyperbaric bupivacaine 5 mg ml(-1) at a dose of 0.3-0.4 mg kg(-1) was used for the spinal anaesthesia. The incidence of postdural puncture complications was recorded from diaries completed by the children and parents one week after the lumbar puncture. RESULTS: The success rate of the spinal anaesthesia was 97% without difference between the needles. The success rate was higher when the aspiration of CSF was easy compared to if it was difficult (98% vs. 88%, P=0.02). Two hundred and seven diaries were returned (97%). Twenty-four children developed a headache, 8 of which were classified as a postdural puncture headache (PDPH), 6 with the cutting-point needle and 2 with the pencil-point needle (n.s.). Nine children developed signs of transient radicular irritation with no difference between the needles. CONCLUSION: Both types of spinal needles can be used in children, and a free aspiration of CSF results in a high success rate of the spinal block. Postpuncture complications are as common in children as in adults.     

Bupivacaine 0.1% does not improve postoperative epidural fentanyl analgesia after abdominal or thoracic surgery

Epidural infusions of fentanyl, in a 10 micrograms.ml-1 concentration, combined with bupivacaine 0.1% were compared with epidural infusions of fentanyl alone for postoperative analgesia following abdominal or thoracic surgery. There were no detectable differences between the two groups in analgesia (mean visual analogue scale pain scores ranging between 15-35 mm), average infusion rates of 7-9 ml.hr-1, and serum fentanyl concentrations which reached 1-2 ng.ml-1. There was no difference in postoperative pulmonary function (pH, PaCO2, SaO2), or bowel function (time to flatus or po fluids). The incidence of side-effects including somnolence, nausea and vomiting, pruritus and postural hypotension was also similar. Of the patients receiving fentanyl and bupivacaine 0.1%, three developed a transient unilateral sensory loss to pinprick and ice, and two of these patients had unilateral leg weakness equal to a Bromage 1 score. The addition of bupivacaine 0.1% does not improve epidural infusions of fentanyl using a 10 micrograms.ml-1 concentration following abdominal or thoracic surgery.     

Adrenaline markedly improves thoracic epidural analgesia produced by a low-dose infusion of bupivacaine, fentanyl and adrenaline after major surgery: A randomised, double-blind, cross-over study with and without adrenaline

Background: Basic pharmacological research indicates that there are synergistic antinociceptive effects at the spinal cord level between adrenaline, fentanyl and bupivacaine. Our clinical experience with such a mixture in a thoracic epidural infusion after major surgery confirms this. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the effects on postoperative pain intensity, pain relief and side effects when removing adrenaline from this triple epidural mixture. Methods: A prospective, randomised, double-blind, cross-over study was carried out in 24 patients after major thoracic or abdominal surgery. Patients with only mild pain when coughing during a titrated thoracic epidural infusion of about 10 ml · h^?1 of bupivacaine 1 mg · ml^?1, fentanyl 2 μg · ml^?1, and adrenaline 2 μg · ml^?1 were included. On the 1^st and 2^nd postoperative days each patient was given a double-blind epidural infusion, at the same rate, with or without adrenaline. The effect was observed for 4 h or until pain when coughing became unacceptable in spite of a rescue analgesic procedure. Rescue analgesia consisted of up to two epidural bolus injections per hour and i.v. morphine if necessary. All patients received rectal paracetamol 1 g, every 8 h. Fentanyl serum concentrations were measured with a radioimmunoassay technique at the start and end of each study period. Main outcome measures were extent of sensory blockade and pain intensity at rest and when coughing, evaluated by a visual analogue scale, a verbal categorical rating scale, the Prince Henry Hospital pain score, and an overall quality of pain relief score. Results: The number of hypaesthetic dermatomal segments decreased (P <0.001) and pain intensity at rest and when coughing increased (P <0.001) when adrenaline was omitted from the triple epidural mixture. This change started within the first hour after removing adrenaline. After 3 h pain intensity when coughing had increased to unacceptable levels in spite of rescue analgesia (epidural bolus injections and i.v. morphine). Within 15–20 min after restarting the triple epidural mixture with adrenaline, pain intensity was again reduced to mild pain when coughing. Serum concentration of fentanyl doubled from 0.22 to 0.45 ng · ml^?1 (P <0.01), and there was more sedation during the period without adrenaline. Conclusions: Adrenaline increases sensory block and improves the pain-relieving effect of a mixture of bupivacaine and fentanyl infused epidurally at a thoracic level after major thoracic or abdominal surgery. Serum fentanyl concentrations doubled and sedation increased when adrenaline was removed from the epidural infusion, indicating more rapid vascular absorption and systemic effects of fentanyl.