Internal anal sphincterolysis for chronic anal fissure: a prospective, clinical, and manometric study

BACKGROUND: The author proposes a technique of finger fragmentation of internal anal sphincter fibers to relieve anal sphincter spasm in patients with chronic anal fissures. This prospective study evaluates the clinical and functional outcome in a group of patients with chronic anal fissures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients suffering from chronic anal fissure underwent the procedure termed "sphincterolysis." Anal manometry was performed prior to and at 6 and 24 months after treatment. Anal incontinence was evaluated by means of a continence score. Patients were asked to rate the level of satisfaction at the last follow-up. RESULTS: Forty-four patients completed the study. Symptom control was achieved in 7. 4 +/- 3 days in 91% patients whose fissures had healed when examined 4 weeks after the procedure. In 38 of these patients, pain was relieved at the time of first postoperative defecation. Recurrence of fissure was observed in 1 patient at the 6-month follow-up. Three patients had minor continence disturbances, which resolved within 6 months. Anal manometry before and after the procedure showed a significant reduction in mean resting pressure (MRP) (P < .001), while the maximum squeeze pressure before and after the treatment did not reach a statistically significant reduction. As regards satisfaction grading, 79.5% of patients were highly satisfied with the procedure, while another 16% of patients rated the procedure as good. CONCLUSION: Internal anal sphincterolysis seems to be an effective, safe and easy procedure, which decreases anal resting pressure and achieves good symptom control with high patient satisfaction.     

Effect of anterior resection on anal sphincter function

Minor difficulties with continence may occur after low anterior resection. Intraoperative injury to the internal anal sphincter or its nerve supply may contribute to this. To study the effect of low anterior resection on the anal sphincter mechanism, anal manometry was performed on 20 patients before and 10 days after resection. Fifteen patients were studied again 6 months after operation. Resting, maximum squeeze and squeeze increment pressures were recorded. Intraoperative manometry (n = 11) and presacral nerve stimulation (n = 6) were performed to determine whether peroperative injury to the internal anal sphincter had occurred. Resting and maximum squeeze anal canal pressures were reduced by low anterior resection, and did not recover. The squeeze pressure increment did not change. Division of the inferior mesenteric artery, full mobilization of the rectum and mesorectum, and rectal transection did not affect resting anal pressure, which was reduced after EEA anastomosis (mean (s.e.m.) before, 40(5) mmHg; after, 27(4) mmHg; P less than 0.05, n = 5). Presacral nerve stimulation produced relaxation of the internal sphincter. Anal sphincter pressures are reduced after low anterior resection. The external anal sphincter and the nerve supply to the internal anal sphincter appear intact. A direct injury to the internal sphincter is postulated.     

Anorectal function after partial intersphincteric resection in ultra‐low rectal cancer

Aim To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of intersphincteric resection (ISR), in terms of postoperative anorectal function, for ultra‐low rectal cancer in mainland China. Method A total of 43 patients who consecutively underwent curative partial ISR for ultra‐low rectal cancer between 2006 and 2009 were enrolled in the study. Defaecatory function was assessed, using detailed questionnaires, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. The Wexner score was used to assess faecal continence, and anal manometry studies were performed to analyse anal sphincter function. Results Overall defaecatory function was assessed as being satisfactory in 41 of 43 patients. Twelve months after surgery, the mean Wexner score was 4.0 ± 3.6. Anal manometry studies showed a significant change at 3 months and further, gradual, improvement over the following year. During the postoperative period, maximum squeeze pressure reached a normal value of 174.1 ± 19.5 mmHg (P = 0.041) by 6 months and resting pressure was 42.4 ± 5.6 mmHg by 12 months, which was close to the preoperative level (P = 0.038). Conclusion Because of the satisfactory recovery of defaecatory function and good oncological results, partial ISR may be recommended as an effective sphincter‐preserving operation for patients with ultra‐low rectal cancer.     

Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer leads to impairment of the anal sphincter

Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCTx) has become an acceptable therapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. However, little is known about the effect of the RCTx on the function of the anal sphincter. Forty-one consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (cT3, N+) underwent neoadjuvant RCTx with subsequent resection. All patients were examined clinically and by anal manometry for their anal sphincter function. A multichannel water-perfused catheter system was used, and resting pressure, maximum squeeze pressure, and length of the anal high-pressure zone were determined prior to the neoadjuvant therapy and before the operation. The length of the high-pressure zone did not change after the neoadjuvant therapy. However, resting and maximum squeeze pressure decreased significantly after preoperative RCTx. This effect was more pronounced for the resting pressure rather than the maximum squeeze pressure, indicating that the internal sphincter is primarily affected. These results correlated with the clinical data showing an impaired continence status in patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Neoadjuvant RCTx leads to impairment of the anal sphincter predominantly in the internal sphincter. This effect may enhance the surgical impairment of continence after curative resection.     

Comparison of digital and manometric assessment of anal sphincter function

Anal sphincter function was assessed by digital examination and anal canal manometry in 66 patients and controls. Digital scores were allotted by using visual analogue scales for basal and squeeze sphincter function and were compared with the corresponding pressures. There were good correlations between digital basal score and maximum basal pressure (Spearman rank correlation coefficient rs = 0.56, P less than 0.001), and digital squeeze score and maximum squeeze pressure (rs = 0.72, P less than 0.001). There were wide ranges of sphincter function on digital and manometric assessment with considerable overlap between patient groups. Digital scores detected differences in sphincter function between patient groups as accurately as manometry. The sensitivities and specificities of digital scores and anal canal manometry in segregating continent and incontinent patients were similar. It was concluded that digital estimation was equally as good as assessment of anal sphincter function as anal canal manometry.     

Impacto de los colgajos transanales de avance en la continencia fecal

Objective

The aim of this study was the prospective evaluation of the functional results of a series endorectal advancement flaps in the treatment of complex anal fistulas.

Material and methods

A total of 90 patients were operated on for a complex anal fistula by means of fistulectomy and endorectal advancement flap. The functional results were evaluated using the Wexner continence scale and an anorectal manometry study before and after surgery.

Results

There were seven patients with fistula recurrence (7.7%) and the same surgical procedure was performed on five of them, resulting in healing in all cases. Significant reductions in maximum resting pressure (83.85±30.96 vs 46.51±18.67; p<0.001) and maximum squeeze pressure (220.97±100.21 vs 183.06±75.36; p<0.001) were seen 3 months after surgery. On the continence scale, 80% of patients had a normal continence with a value of 0 on thepostoperative Wexner scale, while 20% recorded changes in continence values, most of them lower than 3 points.

Conclusions

Endorectal advancement flap is an effective surgical procedure in complex anal fistulas treatment, with a low recurrence rate. Only 20% of the patients showed changes in the continence value.     

腹腔镜超低位直肠癌经括约肌间切除术后肛门控便机制变化的研究

目的探讨腹腔镜超低位直肠癌经括约肌间切除（ISR）术后肛门控便机制变化的规律。 方法选择2014年6月至2016年6月间29例腹腔镜超低位直肠癌ISR术患者为治疗组,分别于术后1、3、6、12个月时进行肛门失禁Wexner评分,与肛管测压、代直肠静息容量测定相结合以评估患者的排便功能,同时设立健康成人对照组,进行统计学分析。 结果肛门失禁Wexner评分显示,治疗组术后1、3、6、12个月均与对照组差异有统计学意义（P<0.01）,治疗组内术后3、6、12个月均与上一个检测时间点差异有统计学意义（F=182.4,P<0.001）。患者肛管压力测定显示,治疗组术后1、3、6个月的最大静息压、最大收缩压均明显低于对照组（P<0.05）,治疗组内术后3、6、12个月的最大静息压均与上一个检测时间点差异有统计学意义（F=25.029,P<0.05）。代直肠静息容量测定显示,治疗组所有检测时间点的静息向量容积、收缩向量容积均明显低于对照组（均P<0.001）,治疗组内术后3、6、12个月均与上一个检测时间点差异有统计学意义（F=4 640.715、3 421.403,均P<0.001）。 结论低位直肠癌经括约肌间切除术的患者肛门控便功能是一个逐渐恢复的过程,术后12个月左右达到或接近正常水平。     

Functional results of anterior levatorplasty and external sphincter plication for faecal incontinence

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess results of anterior levatorplasty combined with external anal sphincter plication for faecal incontinence. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study involved 44 female patients, 27 with idiopathic and 17 with traumatic faecal incontinence. All underwent anterior levatorplasty and external sphincter plication in our institution between 1986 and 1997. The patients were followed up clinically for a mean 12 (range 2-54) months and 39 (89%) patients also underwent pre-and postoperative anal manometry. RESULTS: In the idiopathic group 5 patients (19%) estimated that the result of the operation had been good and another 18 (67%) reported feeling better than before; the corresponding figures in the traumatic group were 4 (24%) and 10 (59%). The Wexner incontinence score decreased significantly after the operation in both groups. Nineteen patients (70%) in the idiopathic and 14 (82%) in the traumatic group showed improvement of one or more scores on the Kirwan scale. Three patients regained continence completely, one in the traumatic and two in the idiopathic group. There were no significant improvements in mean resting anal pressure or functional anal canal length in either group. Mean squeeze pressure improved significantly only in the traumatic group. CONCLUSIONS: Although the results of anterior levatorplasty combined with external sphincter plication are not perfect, the approach seems to be a valuable alternative in the treatment of patients with idiopathic or traumatic faecal incontinence. Complete continence is seldom achieved, but the grade of incontinence is reduced in the majority of patients.     

Function after anoabdominal rectal resection and colonic J pouch--anal anastomosis.

Twenty-eight patients undergoing anoabdominal resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic J reservoir and eight patients without a reservoir were studied 2 years after surgery. Frequency of defaecation and daytime soiling were inversely correlated with the maximum tolerable volume of the colonic J pouch. The distensibility and threshold volume of those with a pouch were significantly greater than in those without a pouch 6 months or more after stoma closure. Anal resting pressure, squeeze pressure, anal canal length and a positive inhibitory reflex were similar in both groups. Anal resting pressure, squeeze pressure and pouch distensibility correlated with frequency of defaecation in the stable phase. Pouch construction may improve the patient's quality of life in the adaptation phase.     

The effects of biofeedback training of pelvic floor muscles on fecal incontinence

Objective

The purpose of this study is to discuss the effect of pelvic floor muscle training on fecal incontinence.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed on patients who received pelvic floor muscle training from March 2002 to April 2007. There were 55 patients with fecal incontinence (male, 32 cases; female, 23 cases; mean age, 9.4 years old from 6 to 14), including 39 cases of anorectal malformation and 16 cases of Hirschsprung's disease. Pelvic floor muscle training was performed using biofeedback for 2 weeks in hospital, 2 times each day, and 30 minutes each time. The patients were then instructed to carry out self-training at home without the biofeedback device daily and received training evaluations in the hospital outpatient department monthly. All patients completed the training regimen and were followed up for 1 year. Anal manometry and clinical score were evaluated before and after training.

Results

Anal continence of 30 patients had satisfactory improvement, but not for the other 25 cases after training. The mean anal squeeze pressures of the group that had good results and the group that had poor results were 98.4 ± 7.3 and 47.4 ± 13.6 mm Hg, respectively, before training. There were 31 patients whose anal squeeze pressures were above 80 mm Hg, and 26 of these had satisfactory anal continence improvement, including all patients with Hirschsprung's disease. On the contrary, only 4 of 24 cases whose anal squeeze pressure was below 80 mm Hg acquired satisfactory anal continence improvement.

Conclusions

Pelvic floor muscle training could achieve good results in some patients with fecal incontinence. Baseline measurements during anorectal manometry appear to provide good prediction of prognosis and effective management.     

Randomized controlled trial of trimebutine (anal sphincter relaxant) for pain after haemorrhoidectomy

Background Anal sphincter spasm may aggravate pain after haemorrhoidectomy. The aims of this study were to investigate whether a trimebutine suppository (Proctolog) reduced anal resting pressure and, subsequently, to test its efficacy in relieving pain after haemorrhoidectomy. Methods Ten patients underwent anal manometry before and 4 h after Proctolog application. A controlled randomized trial was then conducted on 160 consecutive patients, A standard haemorrhoidectomy was performed. Eighty patients were then randomized to receive an application of Proctolog immediately after the procedure (group 1). The remaining 80 did not receive a suppository (controls, group 2). An independent, blinded observer determined the pain scores. Results Proctolog resulted in a mean 35 per cent reduction in resting anal pressure (P 0.001). However, there were no differences in the pain score at 4 h after haemorrhoidectomy, maximum pain during the first 24 h, maximum pain during the second postoperative day, ketoprofen requirement or need for intramuscular pethidine injections between groups 1 and 2. Conclusion Although Proctolog reduced mean resting anal pressure at 4 h after application, this did not affect pain after haemorrhoidectomy.     

Faecal incontinence: manometric and radiological changes following postanal repair

Ten patients with idiopathic faecal incontinence underwent postanal repair based on clinical assessment of their symptoms. Their manometric and radiological values before surgery were compared with values from 10 normal volunteers and then the changes following surgery were examined and correlated with the clinical results. Anal manometry was performed using a multilumen, low compliance, perfused catheter system. Anorectal angles and perineal descent were established radiologically. Pre-operative manometry demonstrated significant reduction in maximum and squeeze pressure (median 77 mmHg versus 200 mmHg), the volume required to inhibit the rectoanal reflex (median 40 mL versus 70 mL), and the volume retained in the saline continence test (median 400 mL versus 1500 mL). The majority of patients had obtuse anorectal angles (six of 10 at rest), and abnormal perineal descent (eight of 10 on straining). Nine patients have been improved clinically following surgery. Postoperative manometry and radiology have been performed in seven patients and have shown no significant changes. Anal manometry and radiology are objective means of documenting faecal incontinence although their role in selecting patients for surgery is not yet determined. Postanal repair is effective in restoring continence, although the parameters measured have not explained the mechanism of this effect.     

Functional results after laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse

We investigated the functional results after laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse in 29 patients at least 12 months postoperatively. Twenty patients were evaluated completely pre- and postoperatively (median 22 months postoperatively, range 12 to 54 months). Six patients were interviewed by telephone, two patients were lost to follow-up, and one patient died of causes unrelated to rectal prolapse. Patients underwent a proctologic examination, anoscopy, rigid sigmoidoscopy, fluoroscopic defecography, and anorectal manometry pre- and postoperatively, and an additional standardized interview postoperatively. Anorectal manometry showed a significant increase in maximum anal resting and squeeze pressures postoperatively (resting pressure 72 ±8 vs. 95 ±13 mm Hg, pre- vs. postoperatively; P = 0.046; squeeze pressure 105 ±17 vs. 142 ±19 mm Hg, pre- vs. postoperatively; P = 0.035), and continence improved postoperatively (Wexner incontinence score 6.0 ±1.0 vs. 3.9 ± 0.8 pre- vs. postoperatively, P = 0.02). Twenty (77%) of 26 patients were satisfied with the operative result, but functional morbidity was observed in four patients, with two patients complaining of severe evacuation problems. Rectal prolapse recurred in one patient 42 months postoperatively (recurrence rate 1 [3.8%] of 26 patients). Functional results were very similar to those obtained after open rectopexy, with symptoms of prolapse and incontinence improved in the great majority of patients. Presented at the Fortieth Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Orlando, Fla., May 16–19, 1999.     

Differences in ano‐neorectal physiology of ileoanal and coloanal reconstructions for restorative proctectomy

Objective Restorative proctectomy with straight coloanal anastomosis (CAA) and restorative proctocolectomy with ilealpouch‐anal anastomosis (IPAA) are options for maintaining bowel integrity after rectal resection. The aim of this study was to compare clinical function and anorectal physiology in patients treated with CAA and IPAA. Method Three‐dimensional vector‐manometry and neorectal volumetry were performed in straight CAA [53 patients (34 male)] and IPAA [61 patients (39 male)] for ulcerative colitis. Function was assessed using a 14 day incontinence diary. Results Function was similar in both groups, but neorectal compliance and threshold volumes for sensation, urge and maximum tolerated volume (MTV) were significantly higher after IPAA than after CAA. Mean pressure, vector volume and sphincter symmetry at rest were significant determinants of continence in both groups but squeeze pressure did not correlate significantly with function in either group. Threshold volume, MTV, and compliance were significantly correlated with frequency of defecation in patients with IPAA but not with CAA. Conclusion A strong consistent resting anal sphincter pressure is one determinant of continence after both IPAA and CAA. Squeeze pressures do not influence the functional result. In IPAA but not CAA, the neorectum has a reservoir function which correlates with the postoperative frequency of defaecation.     

Anorectal manometry and ileo-anal anastomosis]

Seventeen patients (12 ulcerative colitis, 5 familial adenomatous polyposis) underwent proctocolectomy and ileal J pouch anastomosis. Anal manometry with determination of maximum tolerable volume and a liquid continence test were perform before ileo-anal anastomosis, before closure of the loop ileostomy and 12 months after closure of the loop ileostomy. All patients were continent during the daytime less 12 months after proctocolectomy. The mean stool frequency was 5 stools per day in our 17 patients. A significant increase in maximum tolerable volume and in the liquid continence test was observed during the first year after closure of the ileostomy. Anal manometry is unnecessary after ileoanal anastomosis, but preoperatively, this test is able to exclude some patients with low anal pressure.     

Langzeitergebnisse der Kontinenzfunktion nach ileoanaler Pouch-Anlage

An important aim of proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is to maintain anal continence. Anal sphincter disruption during IPAA is felt to play an important role in loss of continence, which is described in up to 30% of the treated patients in the early postoperative period. Although sphincter function recovers gradually after surgery, some patients stay incontinent. In our investigation of possible parameters involved in preservation of continence after this operative procedure, we focused on changes in anal manometry. We compared these findings with the functional results obtained by questioning the patients and physical examination. Anal manometry was performed with a low-compliance hydraulic perfusion system. All patients underwent a J-pouch procedure with a short rectal cuff for ileoanal reconstruction. We examined 25 patients, 13 underwent operation for the treatment of ulcerative colitis, 12 because of adenomatous polyposis. In the colitis and polyposis group, 28% of the patients reported events of soiling. Three patients (12%) were incontinent. The remaining 15 patients were completely continent. The median time after operation was 58 months, ranging from 12 to 96 months. Comparing the results of anal manometry with standard values of ten age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers, it was found that there was a significant increase in the threshold of balloon awareness and urge to defecate. These sensations were sometimes elicited by pouch contractions. Median pouch- compliance was also clearly elevated in comparison to rectal compliance (P<0.005). Inhibitory reflexes during balloon inflation could not be evoked in any of the patients. Comparing continent with incontinent patients there were significant differences in balloon awareness, urge to defecate, and stool frequency (P<0.01,P<0.01 andP<0.001, respectively). But in contrast to other publications, we could not find significant differences in anal sphincter length, resting and squeezing, anal canal pressure. Pouch compliance was lowered in incontinent patients and negatively correlated with stool frequency (P<0.001,r=?0.82). In conclusion, our study indicates that anal sphincter resting pressure alone is not a crucial factor in continence preservation in the long-term after total proctocolectomy and IPAA. Poor pouch- compliance and concomitant higher stool frequencies seem to be related to incontinence in this patient group.     

Anal vector volume analysis complements endoanal ultrasonographic assessment of postpartum anal sphincter injury

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the role of anal vector manometry in the assessment of postpartum anal sphincter injury and to establish the most suitable method of anal vector volume analysis for identifying significant external anal sphincter (EAS) injury in an at-risk parous population. METHODS: A total of 101 consecutive women with a history of instrumental or traumatic vaginal delivery was recruited. Anal ultrasonography and anal vector manometry were performed. Receiver-operator characteristic curves were used to determine the usefulness of anal manometry and anal vector volume analysis in the identification of significant EAS disruption (full thickness, more than one quadrant involved) detected by ultrasonography. RESULTS: Seventeen women had significant EAS disruption identified by anal ultrasonography. Anal vector manometry provided complementary functional information. Anal vector symmetry index (VSI), determined by analysis of mean maximum squeeze pressure, yielded 100 per cent sensitivity for significant EAS disruption, with a positive predictive value of 61 per cent. CONCLUSION: Anal vector manometry complements endoanal ultrasonography. VSI, determined by means of the squeeze pressure profile, correlates best with significant EAS disruption identified at anal ultrasonography.     

生物反馈治疗中低位直肠癌保肛术后排粪失禁

目的 探讨生物反馈治疗对于中低位直肠癌术后排粪功能障碍的疗效.方法 对24例中低位直肠癌术后排粪功能障碍的患者予以生物反馈治疗（治疗组）,进行治疗前后直肠肛管压力检测及肛管功能评分（Vaizey评分和Wexner评分）,并与同期住院的18例无排粪功能障碍患者（对照组）进行比较.结果 治疗组患者术后肛管静息压（27.8＋9.0）mm Hg,最大收缩压（118.3±42.9）mm Hg,直肠初始感觉容量（19.0±6.1）ml,直肠最大耐受容量（97.5±52.8）ml;显著低于对照组的（55.7±8.5）mm Hg、（233.2±31.7）mm Hg、（25.8±4.4）ml和（229.3±39.7）ml（均P〈0.01 ）.经生物反馈训练后,肛管静息压、最大收缩压和直肠最大耐受容量显著性提高,分别为（47.9±9.3）mm Hg、（193.2±38.2）mm Hg和（189.1±39.0）ml（P〈0.01）,而直肠初始感觉容量未见明显增加[（21.5±4.8）ml,P=0.101].治疗组患者生物反馈治疗前的Vaizey评分和Wexner评分为12.9±2.8和10.1±2.6;治疗后显著降低,分别为10.5±2.3和7.5±2.5（P〈0.01）.结论 生物反馈治疗方法可以改善直肠癌保肛手术后肛门功能障碍.     

Gracilis muscle transposition for faecal incontinence

Transposition of the gracilis muscle for faecal incontinence was performed in 13 patients. Six gained satisfactory continence, four were improved, two did not benefit from the operation and one patient died from intercurrent disease before closure of a pre-existing colostomy. Anal manometry compared with a control group showed no alteration in resting and pressure at a median of 35 mmHg (range 5-63 mmHg), whereas maximum squeeze pressure increased from a median of 38 mmHg (range 5-79 mmHg) to 59 mmHg (range 10-143 mmHg) (P = 0.041) which was, however, significantly lower than 130 mmHg (range 81-236 mmHg) in the control group. All patients who benefited from the operation had an increase in maximum squeeze pressure. The ability to retain a viscous fluid in the rectum was measured in seven patients, four of whom had gained satisfactory continence and three of whom had improved continence. They were able to retain a median volume of 200 ml (range 50-225 ml) without leakage compared with 325 ml (range 250-400 ml) in the control group. These patients could retain the maximum amount of viscous fluid for 5-8 min, whereas all control subjects could do so for more than 15 min. It is concluded that, although gracilis transposition never results in normal continence, acceptable continence may be achieved in selected patients provided careful attention is paid to the technical details of the procedure and provided that systematic postoperative exercises are performed.     

Anal sphincter function after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and endorectal ileoanal pull-through

Anal sphincter function in patients before and after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and endorectal ileoanal pull-through was assessed prospectively. In 21 patients with ulcerative colitis, Gardner's syndrome, or familial polyposis, anorectal manometry was performed before and eight weeks after ileoanal pull-through. The mean +/- SEM maximal anal sphincter resting pressure decreased from 86 +/- 5 to 68 +/- 4 mm Hg after operation. The net change in pressure with squeeze, however, was greater after ileoanal pull-through than before operation (100 +/- 9 v 92 +/- 7 mm Hg). In 19 of 21 patients after operation, balloon dilation of the ileal pouch resulted in relaxation of the internal anal sphincter and contraction of the external anal sphincter. Mean +/- SEM 24-hour stool frequency decreased from 7.6 +/- 0.6 at one month to 6.2 +/- 0.5 at three months. It was concluded that ileoanal pull-through preserves continence and an acceptable stool frequency by maintaining nearly normal anal sphincter function.