Effect of depression on cognition after mild traumatic brain injury in adults

Objective: The current study examined the effect of depression on cognitive test performance in a sample of adults seeking treatment for a mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI). We hypothesized that patients with greater depressive symptoms would perform worse on tasks of fluid cognition compared to those without depression, after controlling for potential confounds.

Method: Patients (N = 76) completed a brief cognitive test battery (NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery; NIHTB-CB) and a depression screening questionnaire (PHQ-9) at 11.7-weeks post injury (SD = 6.3 range 2–26). Cognitive scores were adjusted for age, education, gender, and race/ethnicity. Depressive symptoms were examined continuously and dichotomized as: (1) total PHQ-9 score of ≥ 10, the optimal cut-off for Major Depressive Disorder caseness from prior research, and (2) five or more symptoms of depression, including either depressed mood or anhedonia (i.e. DSM-5-based definition).

Results: Twenty-seven patients (35.5%) met DSM-5-based criteria for depression and 42 (55.3%) met criteria based on PHQ-9 > 10. Depression symptom severity correlated with lower fluid cognition composite scores [r = ?.22, p = .05] and contributed to the prediction of fluid cognition performance in a model that controlled for time since injury and crystallized cognitive abilities [F(3, 72) = 7.49, p < .001; R² = 20.6%]. Examining specific NIHTB-CB fluid subtests, the largest group differences were seen on processing speed (d = .40–.49), cognitive flexibility (d = .32–.36), and episodic memory (d = .20–.34). Depression severity was strongly associated with overall post-concussion symptom burden (r = .77, p < .001).

Conclusion: Depression is a common comorbidity and an important factor to consider when interpreting neurocognitive test performance in adults with concussion in a clinical setting.     

Ascertainment and Prevalence of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in People with Intellectual Disabilities

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) may be under-recognized in people with intellectual disabilities (PWID) and reviews on appropriate screening tools and prevalence are lacking. This review aims to identify PTSD screening tools for PWID and estimate the prevalence of PTSD within this population. Method: Medline, PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane, Global Health, and Web of Science databases were searched (inception to October 2017) to identify eligible literature. Papers were also found via manual searches of the references of eligible studies. Studies were reviewed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, subjected to exclusion criteria and quality appraised using STROBE criteria for observational studies and an adapted form of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cross-sectional studies. Seven studies were identified. Meta-analysis was carried out on the prevalence studies and heterogeneity quantified using I². Results: Three tools for screening PTSD in PWID were found: two for use in adults (the Lancaster and Northgate Trauma Scale and the Impact of Event Scale – Intellectual Disabilities) and the Adapted Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children with PTSD. Five studies reported PTSD prevalence in PWID. The weighted pooled prevalence of PTSD in PWID was found to be 10%, 95% CI [0.4%, 19.5%], toward the upper limit of estimated PTSD prevalence in the general population (5–10%). Conclusion: PTSD can be diagnosed in PWID but may go unrecognized by health-care professionals. The identified tools should be further compared and assessed for acceptability and efficacy to improve the identification of PTSD in PWID.     

The Impact of Intellectual Disability and Autism Spectrum Disorder on Restraint and Seclusion in Pre-Adolescent Psychiatric Inpatients

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Features of intellectual disability (ID) and/or autism spectrum disorder (ASD) may hinder responsiveness to interventions typically used during psychiatric hospitalization to manage severely disruptive behavior, and could increase the likelihood of experiencing restraint and/or seclusion (R/S). This study investigated the occurrence of R/S in psychiatrically hospitalized children rated by their treatment team as having ID and/or ASD and those who were rated as having neither.

Methods: Pre-adolescents (N = 777; M = 9.71; SD = 2.71; Range 5–12) consecutively admitted to an acute psychiatric hospital during a one-year period were assigned a consensus DSM-5 diagnosis of ID (n = 295), ASD (n = 48), Both (n = 77), or Neither (n = 361). R/S occurrences were recorded in terms of their frequency and duration.

Results:52% of patients experienced at least one R/S while hospitalized. The modal number of R/S events for this sample was 0, and for children who experienced any R/S, the mode was 2. Comparisons (ID, ASD, Both, Neither) showed statistically significant differences (p <.001) in R/S events. Children rated as meeting diagnostic criteria for ID (68%; M = 13.9), or Both ID and ASD (78%; M = 18.2), had elevated rates of R/S events compared to cases with Neither diagnosis (35%; M = 7.3). ASD alone (50%; M = 10.0) was not associated with an increase in R/S compared to cases with Neither diagnosis. Data on the duration of these events completely paralleled the frequency results.

Conclusion: Children who met DSM-5 criteria for ID had a greater risk of experiencing R/S during psychiatric hospitalization. To reduce the occurrence of R/S, interventions must be refined and staff specially trained to address the complexities of treating children with ID.     

Concurrent validity of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) in relation to Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) severity levels according to the brief DSM-5 AUD diagnostic assessment screener

Abstract

Aims: The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) is a well-established and widely used screening instrument. It has been shown that AUDIT has good criterion validity in relation to alcohol abuse and dependence according to DSM-IV, but it has not yet been validated following the introduction of the DSM-5 diagnostic system. The aim of this study was to evaluate concurrent validity for the AUDIT in relation to self-reported DSM-5 severity levels for Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) in a Swedish general population sample.

Methods: A postal questionnaire, containing the AUDIT and the 13-item brief DSM-5 AUD diagnostic assessment screener, was sent to a random sample of 1,500 persons drawn from the Swedish population, aged between 17 and 80 years and having a public residence address in Sweden. To evaluate the concurrent validity of AUDIT in relation to DSM-5 severity criteria for AUD, a Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was conducted.

Results: Area under the curve (AUROC) showed excellent differentiation between AUD or not, mild (.93), moderate (.92) and severe (.99). Higher individual AUDIT scores were associated with more severe levels of AUD according to the DSM-5 screener. The optimal cutoff scores approximate earlier research on the DSM-IV and were identified as 5, 7 and 13 points, respectively, for mild, moderate and severe AUD.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that AUDIT is a valid screener for detecting concurrent AUD at three severity levels in the Swedish general population.     

Screening for neurocognitive impairment in HIV-positive adults aged 50 years and older: Montreal Cognitive Assessment relates to self-reported and clinician-rated everyday functioning

As the HIV+ population ages, the risk for and need to screen for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) increases. The aim of this study is to determine the utility and ecological validity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) among older HIV+ adults. A total of 100 HIV+ older adults aged 50 years or over completed a comprehensive neuromedical and neurocognitive battery, including the MoCA and several everyday functioning measures. The receiver operating characteristic curve indicates ≤26 as the optimal cut-off balancing sensitivity (84.2%) and specificity (55.8%) compared to “gold standard” impairment as measured on a comprehensive neuropsychological battery. Higher MoCA total scores are significantly (p < .01) associated with better performance in all individual cognitive domains except motor abilities, with the strongest association with executive functions (r = ?0.49, p < .01). Higher MoCA total scores are also significantly (p <.01) associated with fewer instrumental activities of daily living declines (r = ?0.28), fewer everyday cognitive symptoms (r = ?0.25), and better clinician-rated functional status (i.e., Karnofsky scores; r = 0.28); these associations remain when controlling for depressive symptoms. HIV+ individuals who are neurocognitively normal demonstrate medium-to-large effect size differences in their MoCA performance compared to those with asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment (d = 0.85) or syndromic HAND (mild neurocognitive disorder or HIV-associated dementia; d = 0.78), while the latter two categories do not differ. Although limited by less than optimal specificity, the MoCA demonstrates good sensitivity and ecological validity, which lends support to its psychometric integrity as a brief cognitive screening tool among older HIV+ adults.     

Identification of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review

Introduction: autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and intellectual disability (ID) seem to influence the risk of and vulnerability to exposure to trauma and adverse events. While assessment of a psychiatric disorder in ASD and ID generally is challenging, identification of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) seems particularly so, and knowledge does not seem easily accessible. Methods: This article provides a systematic review of studies describing trauma reactions in individuals with both ASD and ID, including studies involving any single case with the combination of ASD, ID, and PTSD. To systematically explore PTSD symptom presentation in the group, all reported symptoms from studies were assigned by DSM-5 criteria. Results: Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria, eight group studies and 10 case studies. Assessment methodology in studies varied, as did the format of symptom report. DSM-5 criteria provided a useful framework for integrating findings across studies, indicating that PTSD may be identified in individuals with ASD and ID. However, symptoms involving alterations in arousal and negative alterations in thought and behavior seem more easily identified than symptoms of reexperiencing and avoidance. Conclusions: There is an urgent need to identify behavioral equivalents to PTSD symptoms in this group, making it possible to identify warning signs of trauma and abuse even if such incidents are not known to family or professional carers.     

Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Communicative Activity Log (CAL)

Background: The ultimate goal of aphasia rehabilitation is to enhance communicative activities in people with aphasia (PWA) in order to increase their daily activities and social participation. The amount of communication and its quality largely vary according to language and cultural differences.

Aims: This study was designed to develop a Korean version of the Communicative Activity Log (CAL), and to verify its reliability and validity for PWA after stroke.

Methods & Procedures: A Korean version of the CAL (K-CAL) was developed through a cross-cultural adaptation process consisting of the following six steps: translation, reconciliation, back-translation, cognitive debriefing, feedback, and final reconciliation. Internal consistency, test–retest reliability, concurrent validity, and construct validity were used to verify its reliability and validity for PWA after stroke. A total of 50 PWA completed the K-CAL with the help of caregivers. All participants completed the K-CAL again 1 week later to measure test–retest reliability. Communication score on the Korean version of Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 (K-SAQOL-39) was used to demonstrate concurrent validity. Severity of aphasia assessed by Korean version of the Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test (K-FAST) was used to determine construct validity of the K-CAL.

Outcomes & Results: Among the 50 PWA, 20 had cerebral infarction and 30 had brain haemorrhage. Mean duration after onset of aphasia was 47.96 ± 62.01 months. Mean communication scores on the K-SAQOL-39 and K-FAST were 2.63 ± 0.97 and 12.69 ± 9.78 points, respectively. K-CAL demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .987) and test–retest reliability (r = .915, p < .001). Correlation between K-CAL and communication score on the K-SAQOL-39 revealed a high concurrent validity (r = .915, p < .001). Correlation between K-CAL and K-FAST also showed a high construct validity (r = .882, p < .001).

Conclusions: A K-CAL was successfully developed through a cross-cultural adaptation process. Our results suggested that K-CAL had high reliability and validity for assessing communicative behaviour of Korean PWA after stroke.     

Validation of the Italian version of the American Speech-Language and Hearing Association—Functional Assessment of Communication Skills for adults (I-ASHA-FACS)

Background: Impairment of communicative-linguistic and cognitive functions is common after stroke and traumatic brain injury (TBI). While assessment of language function is usually performed in clinical practice, standardised assessment of pragmatic, functional, and communicative competences is less common, even though suggested by many recent national and international guidelines. The “American Speech-Language and Hearing Association—Functional Assessment of Communication Skills for adults” (ASHA-FACS) is a measure of communication disability that investigates functional communication. It has been translated and adapted into Italian in 2001, but psychometric properties of Italian version of ASHA-FACS (I-ASHA-FACS) have not yet been investigated.

Aims: To investigate psychometric properties of the I-ASHA-FACS scale and provide normative data.

Methods & Procedures: Participants included 100 healthy adult persons without neurological disorders nor communicative-cognitive deficits and 80 post-acute outpatients with aphasia following stroke (n = 60) or TBI (n = 20). Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) was used to exclude control participants with cognitive decline (MMSE > 24). I-ASHA-FACS was completed for all participants. All patients were also assessed with Functional Independent Measure (FIM) and either Aachener Aphasie Test (AAT) for persons with aphasia due to stroke or Levels of Cognitive Functions scale (LCF) for TBI persons. I-ASHA-FACS internal consistency, inter- and intra-rater reliability and construct validity were calculated; normative data were also calculated for healthy controls stratified by age and education. Cronbach’s alpha was used for internal consistency analysis. Spearman’s test was used to correlate I-ASHA-FACS and FIM, AAT, and LCF scores.

Outcomes & Results: I-ASHA-FACS showed good internal consistency (α > .84) and strong intra- and inter-rater reliability (r > .97 and >.89). All healthy persons showed very high level of functional communication abilities in all domains of communication independence (higher than 6, on a 7-point scale) and all qualitative dimensions scores (higher than 4, on a 5-point scale). Correlations between I-ASHA-FACS scores and FIM were strong in aphasic persons, particularly in problem solving (r > .71) and comprehension (r > .73) subscales. Correlations between I-ASHA-FACS and AAT were generally from moderate to strong (r values ranging from r = .31 to r = .81), and particularly strong in spontaneous speech subtest (r > .70). Correlations between I-ASHA-FACS and LCF did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusions: I-ASHA-FACS shows good internal consistency, strong intra- and inter-rater reliability and satisfactory validity. The application of I-ASHA-FACS to the Italian population of patients with communicative deficits due to aphasia or TBI is recommended.     

Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 genotype is associated with reduced neuropsychological performance in military veterans with a history of mild traumatic brain injury

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele on neuropsychological functioning in military Veterans with a remote history of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).

Method: This cross-sectional study included 99 Veterans (mTBI = 53; military controls, MC = 46) who underwent neuropsychological assessment and APOE genotyping. Three neurocognitive composite scores—memory (α = .84), speed (α = .85), and executive functioning (α = .76)—were computed from 24 norm-referenced variables, and the total number of impaired scores (>1.5 SDs below mean) for each participant was calculated.

Results: Analyses of covariance adjusting for ethnicity and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms revealed that although no significant differences were observed between mTBI ε4 allele groups on the executive functioning composite (p > .05), mTBI ε4+ Veterans performed more poorly than ε4? Veterans on the memory (p = .045, η_p² = .083) and speed (p = .023, η_p² = .106) composites. Furthermore, Mann–Whitney U tests showed that ε4+ mTBI Veterans displayed a significantly greater number of impaired scores than did ε4? mTBI Veterans (p = .010, r = .355). In contrast, there were no significant differences across any of the cognitive variables between ε4+ and ε4? MCs (all p > .05).

Conclusions: Results suggest that APOE ε4 genotype is related to reduced memory and processingspeed performance, as well as overall cognitive impairment, in those with a history of mTBI, but does not appear to have the same negative effects on cognition in the absence of neurotrauma. Although results are preliminary, the present study advances understanding of genetic influences on cognitive functioning in Veterans with remote mTBIs. Future longitudinal work is needed to elucidate the underlying brain-based mechanisms of ε4 allelic effects on cognitive and clinical outcomes following TBI.     

The effect of DSM-5 criteria on externalizing,internalizing, behavioral and adaptive symptoms in children diagnosed with autism

Objective: Diagnostic criteria for autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) are changing with the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-5), which simplifies the diagnostic categories into social/emotional deficits and repetitive and restricted behavior. ASDs have been closely linked to a variety of other disorders, in particular externalizing disorders such as ADHD, and internalizing disorders including anxiety disorders and obsessive compulsive disorder. The present study examines the externalizing, internalizing, behavioral and adaptive symptoms of children with ASD.

Method: Children diagnosed with the DSM-IV who do not meet diagnostic criteria for DSM-5 and were compared to a non-ASD sample and a sample of those who meet the new criteria. Differences were examined between the three experimental groups with respect to internalizing, externalizing, behavioral severity and adaptive behavior.

Results: No significant differences were observed between the DSM-5 and DSM-IV groups with respect to composite and subscale scores on the externalizing, behavior severity index and adaptive behavior domains of the Behavior Assessment System for Children, Second Edition.

Conclusions: Significantly more impairment was evident for both ASD groups compared to the no-ASD group.     

Impact of Mood Disorders,Psychotic Disorders,and Histories of Abuse on Adaptive Functioning Deficits in Adolescents with Intellectual Impairment

ABSTRACT

Background: There is no study to date that has examined the association between history of abuse and adaptive functioning deficits in youth with co-occurring and psychotic disorders or mood disorders.

Method: This study used a retrospective chart review of 98 youth under the age of 18 (Mean age = 16.06 years) with co-occurring intellectual impairment (Mean IQ = 63.9) and psychotic disorders, mood disorders, or other psychiatric disorders. Using multi-mediation models in the path analytic framework, this study examined the relationships between psychiatric diagnosis (based on DSM-IV criteria), cognitive functioning (Full Scale IQ Scores), adaptive functioning (Socialization, Communication, Motor Skills, Daily Living Skills), and the presence of the history of physical, sexual, and/or emotional abuse/neglect.

Results: A very high incidence of all three forms of abuse was present in the study sample, with more than three-quarters of the youth having experienced at least one form of abuse and more than half having experienced two or the three forms of abuse. A history of sexual abuse was significantly and directly associated with an increased incidence of mood disorders. Mood disorders were the strongest predictors of adaptive functioning deficits. Youth with schizophrenia spectrum disorder scored significantly lower in communication skills than those with bipolar disorder.

Conclusion: Results are discussed in terms of the need for treatment studies and further investigations of the relationship between childhood maltreatment and adaptive functioning in youth with intellectual impairment and psychiatric disorders.     

Psychometric properties of the Actual Week test: a naturalistic prospective memory task

Objective: Prospective memory is the ability to ‘remember to remember’ and a facet of memory important to everyday functioning. For older adults, prospective memory slips are a common concern. In the present study, we conducted an initial validation of a paper-and-pencil adaptation of the Actual Week test, and reported on internal consistency, inter-rater and test-retest reliability, convergent and divergent validity, as well as veridicality of the task. Method: Fifty-eight healthy, community-dwelling older adults were recruited from a larger randomized controlled trial and tested at baseline. The Actual Week test was a naturalistic five-day prospective memory task where participants were assigned eight hypothetical tasks to remember per day for five days. Tasks were either time-cued or event-cued and regular (i.e. occurring daily) or irregular (i.e. varied each day). The proportion of tasks that were recorded as on time and accurate was used as the primary measure of performance. Results: The Actual Week test had good internal consistency (Kuder–Richardson: r > .8), intra-test (intraclass correlation: α > .9) and test-retest reliability (r = .76). There was also evidence for convergent and divergent validity. Task performance was associated with age, but not years of education or sex. Conclusion: The Actual Week test demonstrated strong psychometric qualities and promising evidence for validity as a performance-based measure of everyday prospective memory in older adults. Avenues for future studies include extending the evidence for convergent validity and evaluating feasibility and utility with other clinical populations.     

Normative data for phonemic and semantic verbal fluency test in the adult French–Quebec population and validation study in Alzheimer’s disease and depression

Objective: Verbal fluency tasks are principally used to assess lexical access and have shown usefulness for differential diagnosis. The purpose of Study 1 was to provide normative data in the adult French–Quebec population (Canada) for semantic verbal fluency (animals), for two sets of phonemic verbal fluency (TNP and PFL), and for letter P alone (60 seconds per category/letter). The objectives of Study 2 were to establish the diagnostic and predictive validity of the present tasks and normative data in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and major depressive episode (MDE). Method: The normative sample consisted of 932 participants aged 19–91 years. Based on multiple linear regressions, equations to calculate Z-scores were provided. To assess validity, performance of 62 healthy participants was compared to 62 participants with AD and 41 with MDE aged over 50. Results: Age and education, but not gender, predicted performance on each verbal fluency task. Healthy adults aged 50 and younger had a better performance on semantic than phonemic verbal fluency. In comparison to MDE, AD participants had lower performance on animals and TNP, but not on letter P. Ninety percent of people with a Z-score ≤ ?1.50 on semantic verbal fluency had AD and the global accuracy was 76.6%. Test–retest reliability over one year was high for both animals (r = .711) and TNP (r = .790) in healthy older participants, but dropped for animals in people with AD (r = .493). Conclusions: These data will strengthen accurate detection of verbal fluency deficits in French–Quebec adults.     

Posttraumatic stress disorder and dyslipidemia: Previous research and novel findings from patients with PTSD caused by myocardial infarction

Abstract

Objectives. Based on a brief systematic review suggesting dyslipidemia in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), we studied, for the first time, levels of blood lipids in patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of PTSD caused by myocardial infarction (MI). Methods. Study participants were eight patients with full PTSD, eight patients with subsyndromal PTSD, and 31 patients with no PTSD who were diagnosed using the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) interview after a mean of 32±8 months after MI. Levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) were determined in plasma. Results. Patients with full PTSD had lower HDL-C than patients with subsyndromal PTSD (P= 0.044) and those with no PTSD (P= 0.014) controlling for sex, body mass index, and statin equivalent dosage. Moreover, HDL-C levels were inversely associated with PTSD total symptoms (r = ?0.33, P= 0.027), re-experiencing symptoms (r = ?0.32, P= 0.036), and avoidance symptoms (r = ?0.34, P= 0.025). There were no significant associations of PTSD diagnostic status and symptomatology with the three other lipid measures. Conclusion. Chronic PTSD caused by MI was associated with lower plasma levels of HDL-C. The finding concurs with the notion of dyslipidemia partially underlying the atherosclerotic risk in individuals with PTSD caused by different types of trauma.     

Portable eyetracking-based assessment of memory decline

Introduction: Preferential viewing of novel stimuli in the Visual Paired Comparison task has provided a useful marker of memory and medial temporal lobe function. We created a portable version of the VPC (P-VPC) and contrasted P-VPC metrics against the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in healthy adults, to assess the validity and reliability of the P-VPC as an indicator of memory function across age. A supplementary case series was conducted with individuals diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other dementias, to provide a preliminary illustration of the P-VPC’s use as a measure in clinical populations.

Method: Participants (n = 207) were tested using the P-VPC. Individuals were familiarized with a set of objects, which were each presented alongside a novel object in the test phase. Novelty viewing scores were compared to MoCA scores to index concurrent validity. Item analyses were conducted as a test of internal reliability of the P-VPC. A complementary clinical case series was conducted with AD (n = 4) and dementia (n = 5) participants, who were tested using the P-VPC and further compared to healthy age-matched participants.

Results: Preferential viewing decreased with age in healthy participants, and was positively correlated with MoCA scores. Compared to the MoCA, P-VPC scores did not differ based on education and/or whether English was spoken as the native language. Item analyses revealed acceptable internal consistency. P-VPC viewing percentiles of healthy participants were modeled as a function of age, and illustrated that individuals of the clinical case series diagnosed with AD scored in below-average percentiles, while those with dementia did not score below-average.

Conclusion: Good concurrent validity and acceptable internal reliability were observed, and P-VPC scores were not confounded by education or language experience. Low performance was observed in individuals with clinically diagnosed AD, suggesting that the P-VPC may be a potential tool for screening memory decline.     

Improving Research and Practice: Priorities for Young Adults with Intellectual/Developmental Disabilities and Mental Health Needs

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The Intellectual and Developmental Disability Mental Health (IDD-MH) Research Partnership was created to learn about the experiences and needs of young adults with IDD-MH while accessing and using mental health services. Our national partnership consists of six young adults, five professionals, researchers at Boston University, and representatives from Self Advocates Becoming Empowered and The Arc of the United States. Our partnership worked together virtually for one year.

Methods: We designed and conducted a web survey with young adults with IDD-MH ages 18–30 living in the United States (n = 76). We also completed four national storytelling sessions (1 in person, 3 virtual) that included young adults with IDD-MH (n = 10) and parents of young adults with IDD-MH (n = 6).

Results: We identified eight priority topic areas for young adults with IDD-MH: Transition to Adulthood, Insurance & Financial Resources, Professionals’ Competence, Understanding the Experiences of People who Communicate Differently, Hospitalization, Medication, Alternatives to Medication, and Social Supports.

Conclusions: Using what we learned, we generated recommendations to advance research and practice in areas important to young adults with IDD-MH. These recommendations highlight the importance of community-based options, choice, autonomy, and control for young adults with IDD-MH.     

Elevated rates of memory impairment in military service-members and veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder

Introduction: Studies investigating the neurocognitive effects of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) routinely find “deficits” in various cognitive domains. However, the rate of cognitive impairment in individuals with PTSD remains unclear, as studies have focused on null hypothesis testing (NHT) and inferring patterns of impairment rather than empirically determining the rate of cognitive impairment in this sample. Method: This study examined rates of cognitive impairment using a domain-specific approach in non-treatment-seeking Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation New Dawn service members and veterans with (n = 92) and without (n = 79) PTSD and without substance abuse/dependence who passed a performance validity measure and were matched on age, education, estimated IQ, and ethnicity. Chi-square analyses were used to compare the rate of cognitive impairment across groups based on normative scores using three cutoffs (?1, ?1.5, and ?2 SDs). NHT was also used to compare performances across groups. Results: Individuals with PTSD showed higher rates of impairment in memory (?1-SD cutoff) than controls, but equivalent rates of impairment in attention, processing speed, and executive functioning; no significant differences were found on NHT. Impairment in any domain was also more prevalent in PTSD (?1-, ?1.5-, and ?2-SD cutoffs). No differences were found on NHT or rates of impairment in individuals with PTSD with (n = 34) and without (n = 58) depression. Conclusions: Patients with PTSD were more likely to meet criteria for memory impairment and to show impairment in any domain than controls. Patients with PTSD and comorbid depression were no more likely to be impaired in any cognitive domain or to have lower scores on individual cognitive tasks than patients with PTSD alone. Clinicians noting cognitive impairment in individuals with PTSD should exercise caution before ascribing that impairment to another etiology if deficits are limited to memory.     

Brief Report: Comparability of DSM-IV and DSM-5 ASD Research Samples

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-5) criteria for ASD have been criticized for being too restrictive, especially for more cognitively-able individuals. It is unclear, however, if high-functioning individuals deemed eligible for research via standardized diagnostic assessments would meet DSM-5 criteria. This study investigated the impact of DSM-5 on the diagnostic status of 498 high-functioning participants with ASD research diagnoses. The percent of participants satisfying all DSM-5-requirements varied significantly with reliance on data from the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS; 33 %) versus Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R; 83 %), highlighting the impact of diagnostic methodology on ability to document DSM-5 symptoms. Utilizing combined ADOS/ADI-R data, 93 % of participants met DSM-5 criteria, which suggests likely continuity between DSM-IV and DSM-5 research samples characterized with these instruments in combination.     

A comparison of the sensitivity,stability, and reliability of three diagnostic schemes for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders

HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) occur in approximately 50% of HIV-infected individuals, yet available diagnostic criteria yield varying prevalence rates. This study examined the frequency, reliability, and sensitivity to everyday functioning problems of three HAND diagnostic criteria (DSM-5, Frascati, Gisslén). Participants included 361 adults with HIV disease and 199 seronegative adults. Neurocognitive status as defined by each of the three diagnostic systems was determined via a comprehensive neuropsychological battery. Everyday functioning was evaluated through self-report and clinician ratings. Results of logistic regressions revealed an association of HIV serostatus with Frascati-defined neurocognitive impairment (p = .027, OR = 1.7[1.1, 2.7]), but not DSM-5 or Gisslén-defined criteria (ps > .05). Frascati and DSM-5 criteria demonstrated agreement on 71% of observations, Frascati and Gisslén showed agreement on 80%, and DSM-5 and Gisslén criteria showed agreement on 46%, though reliability across the three criteria was poor. Only Frascati-defined neurocognitive impairment significantly predicted everyday functioning problems (p = .002, OR = 2.3[1.4, 3.8]). However, when both neurocognitive and complaint criteria were considered, the DSM-5 guidelines demonstrated significant relationships to everyday functioning, serostatus, and also increased reliability overtime compared to neurocognitive criteria alone (all ps < .05). A subset (n = 118) of the HIV+ group was assessed again after 14.0 (2.2) months. DSM-5 criteria evidenced significantly higher rates of incident neurocognitive disorder compared to both Frascati (p = .003) and Gisslén (p = .021) guidelines, while there were fewer remitting neurocognitive disorder diagnoses when Gisslén criteria were applied to the study sample compared to Frascati (p = .04). Future studies should aim to identify gold standard biological markers (e.g., neuropathology) and clinical outcomes associated with specific diagnostic criteria.     

Financial incentives influence ImPACT validity indices but not cognitive composite scores

Introduction: Interpreting change in cognitive performance across baseline and post-concussion evaluations is complicated by poor understanding of how incentives, such as return-to-play, may impact performance. This study examines the influence of an anticipated financial incentive on two sets of outcomes from the ImPACT computerized battery: (a) cognitive composites, meant to serve as measures of cognitive function, and (b) validity indices, proposed as indicators of invalid performance.

Method: 81 uninjured college students, randomized into two groups, completed a concussion assessment battery including ImPACT. The control group received standard administration instructions. The incentive group was told they would receive $20 if their scores ranked in the top third of students who completed testing. Test examiners were blinded to condition, and participants were debriefed upon study completion.

Results: Given the non-normal distribution of the ImPACT cognitive composites and validity indices, non-parametric statistics were used to compare performance between incentive and control groups. Results of Mann-Whitney U tests revealed no significant differences between groups on the ImPACT cognitive composites (all p > .05, r = .04 to .19). In contrast, compared with the control group, the incentive group performed significantly better on all five validity indices: Impulse Control Composite (p = .036, r = .23); Xs and Os Total Incorrect (p = .035, r = .23); Word Memory Learning Percent Correct (p = .036, r = .23); Design Memory Learning Percent Correct (p = .018, r = .26); and Three Letters Total Letters Correct (p = .027, r = .25).

Conclusions: Expectation of financial incentive did not influence performance on the four cognitive composites—the ImPACT’s standard metrics of cognitive function. However, the incentive group, relative to controls, exhibited better performance on each of the five validity indices. These results suggest that ImPACT validity indices are more sensitive to incentive-related changes in effort than the ImPACT cognitive composites, providing support for the validity indicator indices as measures of effort toward testing.