Characteristics of fallers who fracture at the foot, distal forearm, proximal humerus, pelvis, and shaft of the tibia/fibula compared with fallers who do not fracture

This case-control study examined the relation of circumstances of falls and characteristics of fallers with risk of fractures at five sites among persons 45 years of age or older from five Kaiser Permanente Medical Centers in Northern California from 1996 to 2001. Included were distal forearm (n = 1,016), foot (n = 574), proximal humerus (n = 467), pelvis (n = 150), and shaft of the tibia/fibula (n = 141) cases who fell at the time of their fracture, and controls (n = 512) who reported falling in the year before the interview but did not fracture. Interviewers collected information by using a standardized questionnaire. Medium-/high-heeled shoes and shoes with a narrow heel increased the risk of all fractures, and slip-on shoes (adjusted odds ratio = 2.3, 95% confidence interval: 1.4, 4.0) and sandals (adjusted odds ratio = 3.1, 95% confidence interval: 1.5, 6.3) increased the risk of foot fractures. Falling from more than a standing height increased the risk of all fractures by two- to fivefold, while breaking the fall was associated with lower risks of all fractures except the distal forearm. Physical activity and hormone therapy were associated with lower risks of most fractures. These results suggest ways in which risks of fractures in older persons can be reduced.     

Risk factors for proximal humerus, forearm, and wrist fractures in elderly men and women: the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study

Fractures of the proximal humerus, forearm, and wrist account for approximately one third of total osteoporotic fractures in the elderly. Several risk factors for these fractures were evaluated in this prospective study of 739 men and 1,105 women aged > or =60 years in Dubbo, Australia. During follow-up (1989-1996), the respective incidences of humerus and of forearm and wrist fractures, per 10,000 person-years, were 22.6 and 33.8 for men and 54.8 and 124.6 for women. Independent predictors of humerus fracture were femoral neck bone mineral density (FNBMD) (relative risk (RR) = 2.3, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2, 4.5) in men and FNBMD (RR = 2.4, 95% CI: 1.7, 3.5) and height loss (RR = 1.1, 95% CI: 1.0, 1.2) in women. For forearm and wrist fractures, risk factors were FNBMD (men: RR = 1.5, 95% CI: 1.0, 2.3; women: RR = 1.5, 95% CI: 1.2, 1.9) and height loss (men: RR = 1.2, 95% CI: 1.0, 1.3; women: RR = 1.1, 95% CI: 1.0, 1.2). In addition, dietary calcium (men: RR = 2.0, 95% CI: 1.0, 3.6) and a history of falls (women: RR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.4, 2.6) were also significant. These data suggest that elderly men and women largely share common risk factors for upper limb fractures and that FNBMD is the primary risk factor.     

Fall frequency and incidence of distal forearm fracture in the UK.

STUDY OBJECTIVE--This analysis aimed to determine the frequency of falls in men and women aged 50 years and over and to explore whether age variation in fall frequency may explain variation in the incidence of distal forearm fracture in women. DESIGN--This was a cross sectional survey. SETTING--Primary care based registers in four UK areas. PARTICIPANTS--Altogether 501 men and 702 women age 50-79 years participated. MAIN RESULTS--A total of 131 (26.1%) men and 181 (25.8%) women reported falling in the previous year. In women, the frequency of falls rose with age (chi 2 test for trend 4.33; p = 0.04), with no obvious early post-menopausal peak or subsequent decline. Men aged 50-54 years had a significantly increased risk of falls compared with women of this same age group, (odds ratio (OR) = 2.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3, 4.6), though above this age, the risk of falling was greater in women (OR = 1.2; 95% CI 0.9, 1.5). CONCLUSION--There are important differences in the frequency of falls in relation to age and sex. The data suggest that variation in fall frequency per se does not explain age variation in the incidence of distal forearm fracture in women.     

Hip fractures in Norway 1999–2008: time trends in total incidence and second hip fracture rates. A NOREPOS study

Declining incidences of hip fractures are reported from western countries. Norway has among the highest rates in the world. The aim of this study was to investigate trends in total hip fracture rates in Norway between 1999 and 2008 and risk of second hip fractures. All hospitalizations given a hip fracture diagnosis code (International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9 or ICD 10) (cervical, trochanteric or subtrochanteric) in Norwegian hospitals were retrieved with accompanying surgical procedure codes and additional diagnoses. A total of 93,123 hip fractures were identified between 1999 and 2008 in persons ≥50?years. Annual incidences of hip fractures were calculated and tested for trends. Rates of first and second hip fractures (2006–2008) were compared. The age-standardized total incidence of hip fracture decreased by 13.4?% (95?% confidence interval (CI): 11.0–15.6) in women and 4.8?% (95?% CI: 0.7, 8.7) in men. Age-adjusted rates of second hip fractures did not change in the observation period. In those with a prior hip fracture, the age-standardized risk of a subsequent hip fracture was 2.5-fold (95?% CI: 2.5, 2.6) in women, and 4.6-fold (95?% CI: 4.5, 4.7) in men. Total hip fracture rates declined in both genders during 1999–2008, whereas rates of second hip fractures did not change.     

Fractures as predictors of excess mortality in the aged—A population-based study with a 12-year follow-up

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The association between fractures and excess mortality in old age is ambiguous. The objective of this study was to analyze the long-term gender-specific association between fractures and mortality among older persons by controlling several survival related confounders. METHODS: A population-based prospective cohort study in the municipality of Lieto, south-western Finland. Data on health, health behaviour, fractures, and mortality in 482 men and 695 women aged 65 or older was collected from 1991 until 2002. The Cox Proportional Hazards regression model with fractures as time-dependent variables was used in the analyses. RESULTS: During the 12-year follow-up, 295 (25%) persons sustained at least one fracture. Sustaining any kind of fracture was related to excess mortality both in men (age-adjusted Hazards Ratio, HR 2.2, 95% confidence intervals, CI 1.6-3.1) and in women (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.3-2.1). In the multivariate analyses, hip fractures in men (HR 8.1, 95% CI 4.4-14.9) and in women (HR 3.0, 95% CI 1.9-4.9), and proximal humerus fractures in men (HR 5.4, 95% CI 1.6-17.7) were related to increased mortality. CONCLUSION: A hip fracture was a powerful independent predictor of long-term excess mortality in both genders but the risk in men was more than 2-fold compared to women. Proximal humerus fractures were associated with increased mortality in men. Actions to improve prevention, acute care and rehabilitation of fractures are needed in order to reduce excess mortality in older people.     

Risk factors for fractures of the distal forearm and proximal humerus. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures is a prospective cohort study begun in 1986 that includes 9,704 women aged 65 years and older from Maryland, Minnesota, Oregon, and Pennsylvania. A total of 171 women suffered fractures of the distal forearm, and 79 women had fractures of the proximal humerus during the first 2.2 years of follow-up. Most fractures at both sites occurred as a result of a fall. Low bone mineral density was a strong predictor of these fractures; comparing those in the lowest quintile of bone mineral density in the distal radius with those in the highest quintile, the rate ratio was 4.1 for fractures of the distal forearm and 7.5 for fractures of the proximal humerus. Other factors associated with an increased rate of distal forearm fracture independently of low bone mineral density included poor visual acuity, number of falls in the year before baseline, and frequent walking. Factors that appeared to be independently associated with an increased rate of fracture of the proximal humerus included a recent decline in health status, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, infrequent walking, and several indicators of neuromuscular weakness such as inability to stand with feet in a tandem position for more than a few seconds. These data support the hypothesis that distal forearm fractures often occur as a result of a fall in women with low bone mineral density who are relatively healthy and active and have good neuromuscular function, while fractures of the proximal humerus tend to occur as a result of a fall in women with low bone mineral density who are less healthy and less active than average and who have poor neuromuscular function.     

The gender- and age-specific 10-year and lifetime absolute fracture risk in Tromsø, Norway

Aim of this study is to estimate the gender- and age-specific 10-year and lifetime absolute risks of non-vertebral and osteoporotic (included hip, distal forearm and proximal humerus) fractures in a large cohort of men and women. This is a population-based 10 years follow-up study of 26,891 subjects aged 25 years and older in Tromsø, Norway. All non-vertebral fractures were registered from 1995 throughout 2004 by computerized search in radiographic archives. Absolute risks were estimated by life-table method taking into account the competing risk of death. The absolute fracture risk at each year of age was estimated for the next 10 years (10-year risk) or up to the age of 90 years (lifetime risk). The estimated 10-year absolute risk of all non-vertebral fracture was higher in men than women before but not after the age of 45 years. The 10-year absolute risk for non-vertebral and osteoporotic fractures was over 10%, respectively, in men over 65 and 70 years and in women over 45 and 50 years of age. The 10-year absolute risks of hip fractures at the age of 65 and 80 years were 4.2 and 18.6% in men, and 9.0 and 24.0% in women, respectively. The risk estimates for distal forearm and proximal humerus fractures were under 5% in men and 13% in women. The estimated lifetime risks for all fracture locations were higher in women than men at all ages. At the age of 50 years, the risks were 38.1 and 24.8% in men and 67.4 and 55.0% in women for all non-vertebral and osteoporotic fractures, respectively. The estimated gender- and age-specific 10-year and lifetime absolute fracture risk were higher in Tromsø than in other populations. The high lifetime fracture risk reflects the increased burden of fractures in this cohort.     

Effectiveness of Hip Protectors to Reduce Risk for Hip Fracture from Falls in Long-Term Care

ObjectiveTo generate evidence of the effectiveness of hip protectors to minimize risk of hip fracture at the time of falling among residents of long-term care (LTC) by contrasting rates of hip fractures between falls with and without hip protectors.DesignA 12-month, retrospective cohort study. We retrospectively reviewed fall incident reports recorded during the 12 months prior to baseline in participating homes.Setting and participantsA population-based sample comprising all residents from 14 LTC homes owned and operated by a single regional health authority, who experienced at least 1 recorded fall during the 12-month study.ResultsAt baseline, the pooled mean (standard deviation) age of residents in participating homes was 82.7 (11.3) years and 68% were female. Hip protectors were worn in 2108 of 3520 (60%) recorded falls. Propensity to wear hip protectors was associated with male sex, cognitive impairment, wandering behavior, cardiac dysrhythmia, use of a cane or walker, use of anti-anxiety medication, and presence of urinary and bowel incontinence. The incidence of hip fracture was 0.33 per 100 falls in falls with hip protectors compared with 0.92 per 100 falls in falls without hip protectors, representing an unadjusted relative risk (RR) of hip fracture of 0.36 (95% confidence interval 0.14–0.90, P = .029) between protected and unprotected falls. After adjusting for propensity to wear hip protectors, the RR of hip fracture was 0.38 (95% confidence interval 0.14–0.99, P = .048) during protected vs unprotected falls.Conclusions and implicationsHip protectors were worn in 60% of falls, and the risk of hip fracture was reduced by nearly 3-fold by wearing a hip protector at the time of falling. Given that most clinical trials have failed to attain a similar level of adherence, our findings support the need for future research on the benefits of dissemination and implementation strategies to maximize adherence with hip protectors in LTC.     

Risk factors for proximal humerus fracture

This case-control study of proximal humerus fracture included 448 incident female and male cases and 2,023 controls aged 45 years or older identified in five Northern California Kaiser Permanente Medical Centers in 1996-2001. Data were collected by using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Some factors related to low bone mass, including number of fractures since age 45 years and low dietary calcium intake, were associated with increased risks of fracture, and factors thought to protect against bone loss, such as menopausal hormone therapy and calcium carbonate tablet use, were associated with reduced risks. Fall-related risk factors included previous falls, diabetes mellitus, and difficulty walking in dim light. Possible fall-related risk factors suggested for the first time in this study were seizure medication use (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 2.80, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.45, 5.42), depression (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 0.98, 1.84), almost always using a hearing aid (OR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.12, 3.31 vs. never prescribed), and left-handedness (OR = 2.36, 95% CI: 1.51, 3.68 vs. right-handedness). Difficulty with activities of daily living and lack of physical activity tended to be associated with increased risk. Prevention of falls among frail, osteoporotic persons would likely reduce the frequency of proximal humerus fracture.     

Foot problems as risk factors of fractures

This case-control study examines whether foot problems are risk factors of fractures of five sites among people aged 45 years or older at six Kaiser Permanente Medical Centers in northern California. From October 1996 to May 2001, interviewers collected information through a standardized questionnaire. Incident cases of distal forearm (n = 1,000), foot (n = 827), proximal humerus (n = 448), shaft of the tibia/fibula (n = 168), and pelvis (n = 172) fractures and 1,913 controls from the same medical centers were included. After adjustment for potential confounders and for each additional foot problem, the odds of a foot fracture increased by 8% (adjusted odds ratio = 1.08, 95% confidence interval: 1.03, 1.13). In contrast, each additional foot problem was associated with a reduction in the odds of a forearm fracture (adjusted odds ratio = 0.93, 95% confidence interval: 0.89, 0.98). In general, foot problems were not related to fractures of other sites, although diabetes, which may result in foot problems, increased the odds of a proximal humerus fracture (adjusted odds ratio = 1.65, 95% confidence interval: 1.20, 2.26). If these findings are supported by data from other studies, preventive measures to retard the development of foot problems could reduce the incidence of foot fractures.     

Milk, dietary calcium, and bone fractures in women: a 12-year prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined whether higher intakes of milk and other calcium-rich foods during adult years can reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures. METHODS: This was a 12-year prospective study among 77761 women, aged 34 through 59 years in 1980, who had never used calcium supplements. Dietary intake was assessed with a food-frequency questionnaire in 1980, 1984, and 1986. Fractures of the proximal femur (n = 133) and distal radius (n = 1046) from low or moderate trauma were self-reported on biennial questionnaires. RESULTS: We found no evidence that higher intakes of milk or calcium from food sources reduce fracture incidence. Women who drank two or more glasses of milk per day had relative risks of 1.45 for hip fracture (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.87, 2.43) and 1.05 for forearm fracture (95% CI = 0.88, 1.25) when compared with women consuming one glass or less per week. Likewise, higher intakes of total dietary calcium or calcium from dairy foods were not associated with decreased risk of hip or forearm fracture. CONCLUSIONS: These data do not support the hypothesis that higher consumption of milk or other food sources of calcium by adult women protects against hip or forearm fractures.     

Reproductive history and postmenopausal risk of hip and forearm fracture

This case-control study was designed to investigate the relation between reproductive history and occurrence of hip and forearm fractures in postmenopausal women. Three hundred and fifty-five King County, Washington women who sustained a fracture between 1976 and 1980 and 562 control women were interviewed regarding their reproductive history and other factors. After controlling for the confounding effects of age, obesity, and use of noncontraceptive estrogens, the authors found that women who gave birth four or more times had a risk of fracture similar to women who had not given birth (odds ratio = 1.2, 95% confidence interval = 0.7-2.2), and women who breastfed for more than two years had a risk of fracture similar to women who had never breastfed (odds ratio = 0.8, 95% confidence interval = 0.4-1.5).     

Hip fractures in women with breast cancer

The authors investigated whether the incidence of first hip fracture, an indicator of osteoporosis, is lower in breast cancer patients, who are assumed to have higher levels of endogenous estrogens, than in other women. A population-based Swedish cohort comprising 9,673 women with invasive breast cancer diagnosed from 1958 through 1983 was followed up with respect to the occurrence of a first hip fracture during the period 1965-1983. Overall, the number of observed acute fractures (n = 387) was slightly higher than expected (n = 348.6) (standardized incidence ratio (SIR) = 1.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-1.2). Risk for trochanteric fractures was slightly higher than expected (SIR = 1.2, 95% CI 1.0-1.4), but risk for cervical fractures was not (SIR = 1.0, 95% CI 0.9-1.1). Risk for trochanteric fracture decreased with increasing age at breast cancer diagnosis, reaching standardized incidence ratios close to unity after the age of 70 years. Duration of follow-up appeared to be unrelated to the risk of either type of fracture. The authors conclude that the incidence of first hip fracture is not lower in breast cancer patients than in other women.     

Is radiographic vertebral fracture a risk factor for mortality?

Clinical fractures predict increased mortality risk, but few studies report mortality based on prevalent radiographically defined vertebral fracture. This study examined whether radiographically defined vertebral fracture is a risk factor for mortality in older adults. The 1,580 participants in California (631 men, 949 women) were aged > or =50 years in 1992-1996. Lateral spine radiographs, and information about medical history and behaviors, were obtained. Overall, 55 (8.7%) men and 123 (13%) women had at least one prevalent fracture at baseline; of these, 48 women and 14 men had two or more. Over 7.6 years, 460 participants died, 27.6% without and 41.0% with prevalent fractures (p < 0.001). Prevalent vertebral fracture was not associated with all-cause mortality in both sexes combined (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.09, 95% confidence interval: 0.84, 1.42) or sex-specific analyses (women: adjusted hazard ratio = 1.15, 95% confidence interval: 0.83, 1.59; men: adjusted hazard ratio = 0.89, 95% confidence interval: 0.55, 1.46). However, women with two or more prevalent fractures had increased risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.56, 95% confidence interval: 1.01, 2.40; p = 0.04). Women with any prevalent vertebral fractures also had increased mortality risk from "other" causes (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.59, 95% confidence interval: 1.03, 2.45; p = 0.04) but not cardiovascular disease or cancer. A single radiographic vertebral fracture is not a risk for mortality in older women; larger, longer studies of men and those with two or more radiographic vertebral fractures are needed.     

Hip fractures and Alzheimer's disease in elderly institutionalized Canadians

PURPOSE: To examine the associations among Alzheimer's disease, hip fractures, and falls in elderly Canadians > or = 65 years of age (n=1513) who participated in the National Population Health Survey for Health Institutions between 1994 and 1995. METHODS: The survey was designed to provide health-related information for residents of Canadian health institutions. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between hip fractures and Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Covariates assessed included osteoporosis, age, sex, medications, and comorbid conditions. We did an additional analysis confined to participants who fell, in an attempt to tease out the contribution of falling to the relation between AD and hip fractures. RESULTS: The adjusted odds ratio relating Alzheimer's disease to hip fracture was 2.18 (95% CI: 1.26-3.79). Among those who reported falling, the adjusted odds ratio relating Alzheimer's disease to hip fracture was 1.78 (95% CI: 1.01-3.14). CONCLUSIONS: The most important finding in this study is the independent relation between Alzheimer's disease and hip fractures.     

Usual physical activity and hip fracture in older men: an application of semiparametric methods to observational data

Few studies have examined the relation between usual physical activity level and rate of hip fracture in older men or applied semiparametric methods from the causal inference literature that estimate associations without assuming a particular parametric model. Using the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly, the authors measured usual physical activity level at baseline (2000-2002) in 5,682 US men ≥65 years of age who were enrolled in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study. Physical activity levels were classified as low (bottom quartile of Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly score), moderate (middle quartiles), or high (top quartile). Hip fractures were confirmed by central review. Marginal associations between physical activity and hip fracture were estimated with 3 estimation methods: inverse probability-of-treatment weighting, G-computation, and doubly robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation. During 6.5 years of follow-up, 95 men (1.7%) experienced a hip fracture. The unadjusted risk of hip fracture was lower in men with a high physical activity level versus those with a low physical activity level (relative risk = 0.51, 95% confidence interval: 0.28, 0.92). In semiparametric analyses that controlled confounding, hip fracture risk was not lower with moderate (e.g., targeted maximum likelihood estimation relative risk = 0.92, 95% confidence interval: 0.62, 1.44) or high (e.g., targeted maximum likelihood estimation relative risk = 0.88, 95% confidence interval: 0.53, 2.03) physical activity relative to low. This study does not support a protective effect of usual physical activity on hip fracture in older men.     

Fracture risk in the U.S. Medicare population

Using data from the 5% U.S. Medicare sample, we estimated the actuarial (life table) risk that a person aged 65 will fracture the upper or lower limbs or the pelvis, by age 75, 80, 85, and 90, taking into account the chance of dying in the interval. The actuarial risk of a 65-year old white woman sustaining a fracture by age 90 is 16% for the hip, 9% for distal forearm, 5% for proximal humerus, and 4% for ankle. Black women and white men have substantially lower risks, and the risks for black men are very low. Although hip fractures pose the single greatest risk, the risk of all other fractures combined is greater. White women have particularly high risks for all fractures, because of their longevity as well as their high fracture rates. It is important to adjust for the probability of dying when estimating risks in an elderly population.     

Fracture risk of patients suffering from dizziness: A retrospective cohort study

Abstract

Background: Dizziness is known to be associated with the risk of falls. However, there is not much evidence for the increase of fractures caused by dizziness. Objectives: The aim of the study was to investigate whether the symptom of dizziness is associated with an increased fracture rate. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using a population-based administrative database in the Province of Quebec, Canada. A cohort of n = 2 442 patients with at least one diagnosis of dizziness was compared to n = 16 125 unexposed patients. The main outcome measure was any kind of first fracture after the index date of dizziness. Results: Analysis revealed a moderate effect of dizziness as an independent contributing factor to fractures (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.55). A fracture in the year before the index date was highly associated with the incidence of a subsequent fracture (HR 2.69, 2.09 to 3.47), and fractures were less frequent in women (HR 0.70, 0.60–0.82). Analysis further revealed that dizziness (HR 1.31, 1.05–1.64) and prior fractures (HR 2.41, 1.81–3.22) were associated with non-osteoporotic fractures, which were also less frequent in women (HR 0.59, 0.50–0.71). The incidence of fractures in sites typical for osteoporosis correlated with a precedent fracture (HR 3.91, 2.31–6.63), but not with dizziness (HR 1.10, 0.69–1.75).

Conclusion: Besides the ‘typical’ elderly female patient being at risk of osteoporotic fractures, male patients suffering from dizziness should be carefully evaluated, and prevention strategies should be considered to minimise their risk of suffering non-osteoporotic fractures.     

Sarcopenia Combined With FRAX Probabilities Improves Fracture Risk Prediction in Older Chinese Men

ObjectivesTo examine whether the inclusion of sarcopenia in prediction models adds any incremental value to fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX).Design, Setting, and ParticipantsData from a prospective cohort of 4000 community-dwelling Chinese men and women aged 65 years and older with adjudicated fracture outcomes were analyzed.MeasurementsAt baseline, femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed, as were the clinical risk factors included in FRAX, along with additional appendicular skeletal muscle mass, grip strength, and gait speed. Sarcopenia was defined according to the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia algorithm. Incident fractures were documented during the follow-up period from 2001 to 2013.ResultsOf 4000 participants, 565 experienced at least 1 type of incident fracture and 132 experienced a hip fracture during a follow-up of 10.2 years. Hazard ratios (HRs) for 1-unit increase in FRAX score without BMD in men were 1.12 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08–1.16] for all fractures combined and 1.19 (95% CI 1.13–1.27) for hip fracture, and in women were 1.04 (95% CI 1.03–1.06) for all fractures combined and 1.08 (95% CI 1.06–1.11) for hip fracture. Similar to results of the FRAX score without BMD, HRs for 1-unit increase in FRAX score with BMD in men were 1.04 (95% CI 1.03–1.06) for all fractures combined and 1.19 (95% CI 1.13–1.25) for hip fracture, and in women were 1.04 (95% CI 1.03–1.05) for all fractures combined and 1.06 (95% CI 1.05–1.08) for hip fracture. Sarcopenia was significantly associated with all fractures combined (Adjusted HR 1.87; 95% CI 1.30–2.68) and hip fracture (Adjusted HR 2.67; 95% CI 1.46–4.90) in men but not in women. The discriminative values for fracture, as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, were 0.60–0.73 and 0.62–0.76 for FRAX without and with BMD, respectively. Adding sarcopenia did not significantly improve the discriminatory capacity over FRAX (P > .05). Using reclassification techniques, sarcopenia significantly enhanced the integrated discrimination improvement by 0.6% to 1.2% and the net reclassification improvement by 7.2% to 20.8% in men, but it did not contribute to predictive accuracy in women.ConclusionsSarcopenia added incremental value to FRAX in predicting incident fracture in older Chinese men.     

The accuracy of self-report of fractures in elderly women: evidence from a prospective study.

The authors compared self-reports of non-spine fractures in a cohort of elderly white women with radiologic reports and medical records. Subjects (n = 9,704) were recruited between 1986 and 1988 in Baltimore, Pittsburgh, Minneapolis, and Portland, Oregon. Eleven percent (95% confidence interval 9-13%) of self-reports of fracture were false-positive (radiographs were negative) and a total of 20% (18-23%) could not be confirmed (radiographs were negative, uncertain, or not available). Report by proxy respondent was more accurate than self-report. There were no confirmed fractures in the medical records of a random sample of 283 participants who did not report a fracture. The percent of false-positives varied by the site of the injury and was low for self-reported fractures of the shoulder or upper arm (5%; 1-13%), wrist (8%; 4-11%), and hip (11%; 5-19%), but was high for hand or finger (20%; 12-30%), rib (23%; 15-32%), and face or skull (33%; 17-54%). Having a college education was associated with increased accuracy, while a history of falls and self-reported osteoporosis were associated with decreased accuracy. The authors conclude that elderly women overreport fractures, but that self-report is relatively accurate for several important osteoporotic fractures, including those of the hip, wrist, and humerus. Self-report of "any" fracture, rib, distal extremity, and head fracture, and fractures in women with a tendency to fall or with osteoporosis should be verified by a radiologic diagnosis.