The effect of cromolyn sodium powder as a treatment for ragweed pollinosis

The effect of treating ragweed pollinosis with intranasal cromolyn sodium powder was evaluated in 26 patients in a double-blind clinical study. Thirteen matched patient pairs were treated by either nasal insufflation of cromolyn sodium powder, 20 mg three times daily, or by a placebo powder. Patients were monitored for severity of symptoms by means of daily symptom diaries collected weekly throughout the pollen season. Serum samples were obtained in July prior to the ragweed season and following the ragweed season during the first and fourth weeks of October for the determination of ragweed-specific IgE antibody levels by the radioallergosorbent test. A significant reduction in symptom severity was observed in the treated patients with high preseasonal levels of IgE antibody to ragweed. Initially the levels of IgE antibody to ragweed did not differ between the two groups. IgE antibody levels increased in both groups after pollen exposure, but the treated group showed a significantly greater rise in IgE antibody levels. The results suggest that treatment with cromolyn sodium enhanced IgE antibody response to pollen exposure and significantly reduced the severity of hay fever symptoms in patients with high preseasonal levels of IgE antibody to ragweed.     

Preseasonal intranasal immunotherapy with nebulized short ragweed extract

We determined the effect of preseasonal intranasal short ragweed (SRW) immunotherapy in a double-blind, nonpaired, 20-wk study involving 33 SRW-sensitive patients. Patients were selected on the basis of an elevated IgE serum antibody level, a positive intradermal skin test, and a positive intranasal challenge to SRW antigen. SRW-treated patients sprayed SRW solutions intranasally six times a day for 12 wk preseasonally. Placebo-treated patients used nebulized solutions containing buffer or histamine that were interchanged randomly throughout this period. The SRW-treated group reported more preseasonal symptoms than the placebo-treated group (p < 0.003); however, during the SRW pollination season, the SRW-treated group reported significantly less sneezing, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, red/itchy eyes, itchy nose/throat, and cough/wheeze. Supplemental antihistamine usage was similar in both groups. The treatment did not affect serum IgE antibody levels to crude SRW, AgE, Ra3, or Ra5 in either group at any time during the study. No significant production of IgG antibody to SRW was seen in either group. One SRW-treated patient developed acute sinusitis after 2 wk of treatment; otherwise no side effects other than symptoms of hay fever were noted. Although intranasal SRW immunotherapy may offer an effective and less costly alternative to parenteral immunotherapy, reduction in hay fever symptoms during the pollination season was achieved at the expense of provoking these symptoms during the preceding weeks.     

Topical ocular administration of cromolyn sodium for treatment in seasonal ragweed conjunctivitis.

We studied topical ocular administration of a 4% solution of cromolyn sodium (CS)for treatment of 112 patients with ragweed conjunctivitis in two 8-wk, double-blind, matched-pair studies. During the 1977 and 1978 ragweed seasons, patients instilled a daily total of 12.8 or 19.2 mg CS into each eye, control patients received placebo drops. Treatment efficacy was assessed by daily symptom score diaries, ophthalmic examinations, and a subjective report by the patient at the end of the trials. In the 1977 trial, CS pair members whose preseasonal immunoglobulin E antibody level was <99 ng/ml showed a significant reduction in eye itching (p < 0.01), eye irritation (p < 0.02), visual blurring (p < 0.025), and nasal congestion (p < 0.025) and required less supplemental medication (p < 0.02) during the peak pollen period. In the 1978 trial all patients had IgE antibody levels >100 ng/ml. CS pair members showed a significant reduction in rhinorrhea (p < 0.004) and nasal congestion (p < 0.007) only; no significant reduction in eye symptoms was noted. Transient eye burning was noted by a total of 38 CS and 39 placebo patients from both studies; ophthalmic examinations were unremarkable; and no other side effects were noted. The 4% CS ophthalmic solution provided significant relief of nasal symptoms in both the 1977 and 1978 trials, but significant relief of ocular symptoms was noted only in the 1977 trial and only in those patients with lower preseasonal IgE ragweed antibody levels.     

Local nasal immunotherapy: efficacy of low-dose aqueous ragweed extract

In previous studies preseasonal local nasal immunotherapy (LNIT) with moderate doses of aqueous ragweed extract (mean total dose 59 micrograms of AgE and 139 micrograms of AgE) was an effective treatment for ragweed hay fever; however, local adverse reactions during therapy were common. This study evaluated the clinical and immunologic responses to LNIT by use of lower doses of aqueous ragweed extract in order to minimize these adverse reactions. Patients were administered preseasonal LNIT for 7 wk and received a mean total dose of 4.7 micrograms of AgE. During the ragweed season, symptom/medication scores (SMS) of the treated patients were equivalent to SMS of untreated patients. Serum ragweed-specific IgE and nasal secretory ragweed-specific IgA rose slightly in the treated patients but not to the extent observed in previous studies. After the ragweed season treated and untreated patients had a substantial increase in serum ragweed IgE antibody titers. No correlation could be found between antibody responses and SMS. This study indicates that LNIT with lower doses of aqueous ragweed extract is clinically ineffective.     

Controlled evaluation of allergoid in the immunotherapy of ragweed hay fever

Immunotherapy with ragweed allergoid administered in a clustered regimen, placebos in a clustered regimen, and unaltered ragweed extract (allergen) in a weekly regimen were compared in three groups of hay fever patients carefully matched for ragweed sensitivity. The allergoid and placebo comparison was performed double-blind and the unaltered ragweed extract comparison was single-blind. In terms of antigen E (AgE) equivalents, doses were about 50 times higher in the allergoid-treated group than in the allergen-treated group. Whereas there was no immunologic response to placebos, the allergoid regimen produced a more rapid serum IgG antibody response, with significantly higher posttreatment levels than those in the allergen regimen. Initial IgE antibody rises and subsequent slow declines were similar. Symptom-medication scores were similar in the two specifically treated groups and significantly less than scores reported by the placebo group (p less than 0.01). Due to an overestimate of the initial allergoid doses, systemic reactions occurred mostly in the early visits with allergoid treatment, whereas systemic reactions appeared late in the allergen treatment. The overall incidence was similar. In a second year, after 8 mo of no injections, a preseasonal booster regimen with both materials produced virtually no untoward reactions. During the period of no injections, IgG antibody declines were modest and, after boosters, IgG antibody levels rose promptly. Clinical results in both groups were again excellent, with an advantage for allergoid.     

Clinical and immunologic evaluation of glutaraldehyde-modified, tyrosine-adsorbed short ragweed extract: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Glutaraldehyde-modified, tyrosine-adsorbed ragweed extract (GTR) is a modification of allergen extract to reduce allergenicity but retain immunogenicity. We evaluated the clinical efficacy and immunologic changes associated with the administration of GTR (16,350 protein nitrogen units) or placebo to a group of 100 atopic subjects with ragweed hay fever. The study was carried out in a double-blind, placebo-controlled fashion. Clinical response was measured by daily symptom diaries. physician evaluations, and patient responses. Changes in ragweed-specific IgE and IgG antibody were evaluated with an amplified enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (alpha-ELISA) and were compared with measurements by RAST and a protein A-binding assay for IgG antibody. Treatment with GTR resulted in a sixfold increase in blocking IgG antibody and a small increase in IgE-specific antibody. No changes occurred in the placebo treated group. Mild immediate local reactions occurred after 74% of injections, and late-onset local reactions occurred after 62% of injections in the treated group. The placebo-treated group experienced immediate or late local reaction after only 12% of injections. There were two mild late-onset urticarial reactions of a generalized nature in the treatment group. The treatment group experienced significantly fewer symptoms than the placebo group throughout the season (p less than 0.02), although the difference was not dramatic. The results showed that GTR could be safely given in five preseasonal injections, with retained immunogenicity but less potential for generalized reactions. GTR is an improved method of allergy immunotherapy with the potential for clinical benefit when used in a brief preseasonal treatment regimen.     

Measurement of the absolute levels of IgE antibodies in patients with ragweed hay fever: Effect of immunotherapy on seasonal changes and relationship to IgG antibodies

The effect of immunotherapy with aqueous ragweed pollen extract on changes in IgE antibody was analyzed in 40 untreated patients with ragweed hay fever and compared to changes in 63 treated patients. Treated patients received cumulative doses prior to and during treatment ranging from 1.4 × 10⁵ to 4.8 × 10⁶ protein nitrogen units (PNU). IgG antibody to ragweed antigen E (AgE) was measured by radioimmunoprecipitation, while IgE antibody to allergens in crude ragweed extract was measured by the radioallergosorbent test (RAST). The RAST procedure was calibrated using a serum whose content of IgE antibody in nanograms per milliliter had been determined by immunoabsorption, and with this method the absolute quantities of IgE antibodies to ragweed allergens could be measured. Control experiments indicated that the IgG antibodies in the sera of the treated patients did not interfere with the measurements of IgE antibodies. The levels of IgE antibody in serum varied from less than 5 ng/ml to approximately 3,000 ng/ml. IgE antibodies decreased from October, 1973, to July, 1974, and rose sharply from July to October, 1974, following the pollination season. In both untreated and treated patient groups the magnitudes of the decreases were related (p < 0.001) to the levels of IgE antibody in October, and the magnitudes of the rises were related to the levels of IgE antibody in July. In the treated patients with IgE antibody less than 71 ng/ml in October, the rate of decrease (October to July) was less than in the untreated patients. Comparison of the rises in IgE antibody from July to October revealed that these were partially suppressed in the treated group (p < 0.001), and this effect was most marked in patients with July levels less than 36 ng/ml. Levels of IgG antibody to AgE in the treated patients were approximately 70-fold greater than in untreated patients and showed little change over the study period. The levels of IgG and IgE antibody in the treated patients were positively correlated (p < 0.001) at all time periods, and patients with high levels of IgG antibody also had greater declines and rises in IgE antibodies. The results indicate that immunotherapy is associated with (1) a reduction in the seasonal decrease in IgE antibody from October to July in patients with the low levels of IgE antibody, (2) a partial suppression of the rises in IgE antibody from July to October, and (3) that both these effects are related to the level of IgE antibody before the change. In many treated patients both IgE and IgG antibodies were low in spite of parenteral administration of ragweed extract. This result is consistent with the view that overall humoral immunologic reactivity to ragweed antigens is reduced in these patients.     

Cromolyn sodium nasal solution in the prophylactic treatment of pollen-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis.

A large-scale multicenter investigation was undertaken in 3 cities with comparable pollen seasons and atmospheric pollen concentrations in order to obtain more definite information about the safety and efficacy of cromolyn sodium in the treatment of pollen-induced seasonal rhinitis. The 9-wk double-blind study was conducted in 104 patiets in Pittsburgh, Pa., Cleveland, Ohio, and Louisville, Ky., during the 1975 ragweed season. It indicated that a nebulized 4% aqueous solution of cromolyn sodium is effective in reducing sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and ocular irritation in ragweed hay fever patients. The efficacy of the drug was notable despite the fact that patients used an average of 52 mg instead of the recommended 62.4 mg daily. Cromolyn sodium did not appear to have a significant effect on transseasonal antiragweed IgE (IgEAR) levels. Patients acceptance of the cromolyn nasal solution was good, and there were no significant adverse reactions. The side effects, which were distributed equally between the drug and placebo groups, were mild and of limited duration.     

Comparisons of alum-precipitated and unprecipitated aqueous ragweed pollen extracts in the treatment of hay fever

In 1969 and 1970, groups of patients with ragweed hay fever never before treated were started on preseasonal courses of immunization with an alum precipitate of aqueous ragweed extract. A comparison between these two groups of patients and a similar group of patients treated with unprecipitated aqueous extract in 1968 shows that treatment with alum precipitate was safely initiated with fewer injections even though a higher dose was administered. The larger cumulative dose appeared to give better IgG antibody responses and greater relief of symptoms. A repeat preseasonal course the next year again required fewer injections of the alum-precipitated extract than a repeat course of aqueous extract.     

Studies of perennial ragweed immunotherapy.

Perennial ragweed immunotherapy was studied in 24 patients with ragweed pollenosis. Cellular responsiveness was determined by measuring the cellular reactivity and sensitivity to ragweed antigen E (RW-AgE) by RW-AgE-induced leukocyte histamine release. Serum blocking antibody content was determined by measuring the serum RW-AgE binding capacity by ammonium sulfate coprecipitation of bound RW-AgE. Specific IgE (anti-RW-AgE) concentration was determined by polystyrene tube radioimmunoassay. Cellular responsiveness decreased with continuing immunotherapy, as did the specific IgE concentrations. The serum RW-AgE binding capacity, in contrast, increased as treatment continued. The absence of demonstrable correlations between RW-AgE binding capacity and cellular reactivity, cellular sensitivity, and specific IgE concentrations contrasted impressively with the demonstration of multiple significant correlations between the change in the RW-AgE binding capacity and the other parameters studied. The degree of increase in RW-AgE binding capacity correlated significantly with the degree of decrease in both the specific IgE concentration (p is less than 0.04) and the cellular sensitivity to RW-AgE (p is less than 0.003). these findings suggest that the active process of blocking antibody production, rather than the passive presence of blocking antibody, is related to the process which decreases the specific IgE concentration and the degree of cellular responsiveness and therefore results in clinical improvement.     

Effect of immunotherapy on immunoglobulin E and immunoglobulin G antibodies to ragweed antigens: a six-year prospective study

The effect of immunotherapy with aqueous short ragweed (SRW) extract on IgE and IgG antibodies was tested over a 6 yr period in 47 adults with ragweed hay fever. Sera were collected each year in July and October from 1973 through 1979. In May 1976, 23 patients began immunotherapy with a lyophilized standardized SRW extract. From 1976 through 1979, treated patients received an average total dose of 4.8 × 10³ protein nitrogen units (1039 μg of AgE). IgE antibodies to SRW and ragweed AgE were measured by the radioallergosorbent test (RAST) in antigen excess using allergens bound to Sepharose. Blocking antibodies primarily of the IgG class were measured by RAST interference. In response to inhalation of ragweed pollen, untreated patients showed seasonal rises (July to October) and postseasonal falls (October to July) of IgE antibodies during the entire study period. IgE antibody levels in the untreated patients decreased with time and from 1974 to 1979 fell 41% (p < 0.003) for an average halftime of 6.2 yr. Before immunotherapy, treated patients also showed seasonal rises and postseasonal falls. Treatment with SRW extract in 1976 produced an abrupt increase in IgE and IgG antibodies and a clear-cut suppression of seasonal rises of IgE antibodies without an effect on postseasonal falls through 1978. From 1974 to 1979, IgE antibodies to AgE and SRW decreased more in the immunized group than in the control group, and by 1979 these levels showed a mean fall of 73%. Blocking antibodies increased in the treated patients and reached maximal levels by July 1978. In 1978 and 1979, the levels of IgG blocking antibodies to AgE were inversely related to the IgE antibody levels to AgE. These results indicate that adults with ragweed hay fever show regular seasonal and postseasonal changes in IgE antibodies and that IgE antibodies spontaneously decrease with time. Immunotherapy magnifies these decreases by suppression of the seasonal rises, but it does not affect the postseasonal falls.     

A controlled study of the effectiveness of the Rinkel method of immunotherapy for ragweed pollen hay fever

In a double-blind study, we compared the effects of the Rinkel method of immunotherapy with ragweed pollen extract and placebo on symptoms of ragweed hay fever and immunologic parameters in 24 ragweed-sensitive patients. Each had a skin-test end point by Rinkel serial dilution titration to ragweed pollen extract at 1:312,500 w/v or greater dilution, a 2+ skin test to ragweed AgE at 0.1 μg/ml or greater dilution, and in vitro leukocyte histamine release by ragweed pollen extract. None had had immunotherapy for at least 7 yr. Patients matched on the basis of leukocyte histamine release by ragweed were assigned to two treatment groups (12 patients in each group). One group received ragweed pollen extract, and the other, placebo, both administered by the Rinkel method between June and October, 1978. Treatment doses were derived from skin-test end points. The median maintenance (“optimal dose”) for patients receiving ragweed pollen extract was 0.53 ml of 1:312,500 w/v and the mean cumulative dose of ragweed pollen extract given during the study contained 0.094 μg of ragweed AgE. Symptom-medication scores of all patients rose and fell with ragweed pollen counts. No significant differences were observed in mean daily symptom-medication scores, antiragweed IgG or IgE levels, leukocyte histamine release by ragweed, total IgE levels, or skin-test end-point dilutions with ragweed pollen extract between the group receiving ragweed pollen extract and the group receiving placebo. Despite the absence of specific effect on symptom-medication scores and measured immunologic variates, 10 of the 12 ragweed-treated patients and 10 of the 12 placebo-treated patients were of the opinion that their hay fever symptoms during the ragweed pollen season were less severe in 1978 than in 1977 and that they had been helped by Rinkel method immunotherapy. Under the conditions of the study, Rinkel method immunotherapy with ragweed pollen extract was no more effective than placebo given in an imitation of the Rinkel method.     

Treatment of ragweed hay fever with intranasally administered disodium cromoglycate*

In a double-blind study the therapeutic effect of a 4% disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) nasal solution was evaluated in thirty-nine patients with acute symptoms of ragweed hay fever. Patients were randomly assigned to the DSCG or placebo group as they presented with allergic rhinitis. Overall, the DSCG was not more effective than placebo in controlling the symptoms of rhinitis or in decreasing the need for concomitant antihistamines or corticosteroids. Among patients with the highest pretreatment serum ragweed-specific IgE (RW IgE) levels, drug-treated patients had some reduction in symptoms as compared to their placebo controls during the peak of the ragweed pollen season. DSCG treatment did not influence the usual seasonal rise in RW IgE. Side effects from both the active and placebo aerosols were frequent but mild. We conclude that DSCG nasal solution used for the treatment of seasonal ragweed allergic rhinitis is relatively ineffective.     

Polyethylene glycol-modified ragweed pollen extract in rhinoconjunctivitis

Sixty-two ragweed-sensitive adult subjects volunteered to take part in a 2-year, placebo-controlled efficacy study of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-modified ragweed extract, in ragweed pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis. At the beginning of the study, subjects were stratified according to skin sensitivity to ragweed extract and PEG-modified ragweed and the severity of hay fever in the previous year. There was random allocation of half to active treatment and half to placebo treatment. Before the first ragweed pollen season the 36 most sensitive subjects received 10 weekly injections (group 1), and the remaining 26 received six injections (group 2). Before the second season all subjects received 10 injections. Doses increased by half a log concentration each week unless there were adverse reactions. The mean total dose received by group 1 in year 1 was 385 micrograms of protein (28.9 micrograms AgE) and received by group 2 was 218 micrograms of protein (16.4 micrograms AgE). In year 2 the mean total dose was 1829 micrograms (137.2 micrograms AgE). Sixty-six percent of injections elicited no reaction or a mild local reaction; the remaining injections produced local redness and swelling more than 2 inches in diameter. Four percent of injections produced systemic symptoms. PEG-modified ragweed stimulated increases in ragweed specific IgG antibody both years, but increases in ragweed specific IgE antibody were significant only in group 1 in year 1. The magnitude of the IgG antibody changes was directly related to the total dose injected. At the beginning of the second year, PEG-modified ragweed-treated subjects still had elevated IgG antibody levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Fraction A: a new immunotherapeutic approach for ragweed pollinosis.

Fraction A, a concentrate derived from short ragweed extract by (NH4)2SO4 precipitation, contains all major allergens including antigen E. Therapeutic efficacy and safety of this alum-adsorbed product was evaluated in a multicenter double-blind clinical trial by comparing it to placebo in 131 randomly matched ragweed hay fever patients who were not treated for at least 1 year. Therapeutic response to fraction A injections was more significant than placebo (p less than 0.05) by investigators' evaluation, by average daily symptom score (1.097 vs. 1.378, p less than 0.05) during the peak ragweed season, or by average proportion of days in which medication was required (0.411 vs. 0.584, p = 0.01). Fraction A patients exhibited a significantly higher (p less than 0.0005) increase in hemagglutinating titer after treatment than placebo controls. Radioallergosorbent binding, evaluated in a subgroup of 31 patients before and after the ragweed season, was unchanged or decreased in 12 of 15 patients treated with fraction A. In contrast, 9 of 16 placebo-treated patients showed an increase in this index. Systemic effects were noted after 42 (1.5%) of 2.641 injections, while local reactions occurred at the rate of 2.3%. It is concluded that a single course of preseasonal immunotherapy wih alum-adsorbed fraction A is effective and relatively safe.     

Treatment of ragweed hay fever with urea-denatured antigen E

Urea-denatured antigen E (UDE) has lost the major determinants of antigen E (AgE), eliciting neither IgE nor IgG antibodies to native AgE in mice. UDE, however, stimulates T cells so that repeated injections result in specific but partial suppression of ongoing IgE responses to native AgE. An attempt was made to apply this property to the treatment of 10 ragweed-allergic human volunteers by repeated subcutaneous injections of UDE over about 18 mo. Local and systemic allergic reactions limited the dose to 4 to 75 microgram UDE per injection. Little or no antibody response to AgE was induced. Five patients had increased basophil sensitivity to UDE after 4 mo of injections. Five of eight patients who completed the study had evidence of suppression of IgE responses by exhibiting a 20% or less increase of IgE antibodies to ragweed on natural seasonal exposure. Three patients still exhibited this evidence at the next season of exposure 10 mo after the last injection. The two patients who received the lowest doses had greater than usual seasonal rises of IgE antibodies. There was no clinical evidence of improvement of hay fever symptoms. The results indicate that the immunologic properties of UDE in humans are similar to those in mice. The clinical applicability of these properties remains doubtful.     

The immune response of patients with ragweed hay fever treated with polymerized ragweed antigens.

This report describes the immune response of patients with ragweed hay fever treated with polymerized ragweed antigens (PRW). Their IgG antibody responses to crude ragweed extract, antigen E, antigen K, and antigen Ra3 were determined by a solid-phase radioimmunoassay. The results indicate that PRW contains an array of clinically important antigens that are available for immunologic processing and result in an immune response in patients treated with this new form of immunotherapy for ragweed hay fever.     

Local intranasal immunotherapy with high-dose polymerized ragweed extract

Thirty-one ragweed-allergic patients received preseasonal local intranasal immunotherapy (LNIT) with high doses of gluteraldehyde-polymerized ragweed extract (average total dose 544 micrograms antigen E). Minimal side effects were reported during treatment and did not interfere with the dosing schedule. During the ragweed pollen season, LNIT-treated patients had lower symptom scores for sneezing, rhinorrhea and nasal congestion than a comparable group of untreated ragweed-allergic patients. There was no difference in ragweed-induced eye symptoms between the two groups. Secretory ragweed-specific IgA and IgG rose following LNIT treatment. Absolute antibody titers and changes in titers did not correlate with clinical improvement. LNIT with the polymerized ragweed did not block the seasonal rise in serum ragweed-specific IgE. These results suggest that LNIT with high-dose polymerized ragweed extract is a safe, simple and effective form of immunotherapy.     

Maximal rise in IgE antibody following ragweed pollination season.

Patients allergic to ragweed pollen who did not receive immunotherapy had an increase in ragweed-specific IgE antibodies associated with seasonal exposure. Of 17 such patients, 15 reached peak levels between mid-September and mid-October. Two had peak values after mid-October; the levels were only slightly higher than earlier values. Our study shows that serum obtained in mid-October reflects approximately the maximal IgE antibody level attained 0y ragweed-sensitive patients in our area and that this value can be used as a baseline in monitoring the subsequent decline in antibodies. In addition, our data support an earlier observation that the magnitude of seasonal rise in IgE antibody is related to the preseasonal value. The significantly positive correlation of the results of carefully performed skin tests (end point titration) with radioallergosorbent test (RAST) values suggests the possibility that the RAST can be employed as a reliable diagnostic aid, perhaps even replacing the skin test.     

A comparative study of the effectiveness of the Rinkel method and the current standard method of immunotherapy for ragweed pollen hay fever

In a double-blind study, we compared the effects of the Rinkel and the current standard methods of immunotherapy with ragweed pollen extract and those of placebo on symptoms of ragweed hay fever and immunologic parameters in 43 patients highly sensitive to ragweed. Each had a skin-test end point by Rinkel serial titration at 1:312,500 w/v or greater dilution, a 2+ skin test to ragweed AgE 0.01 μg/ml, and in vitro histamine release by ragweed pollen extract. None had had immunotherapy for at least 7 yr. Patients were matched on the basis of leukocyte histamine release to ragweed pollen extract and assigned to treatment groups. Fourteen received ragweed pollen extract by the Rinkel method, 14 received placebo, and 15 received ragweed pollen extract by the current standard method weekly between February and October, 1979. Rinkel method doses were derived from skin-test end points and were advanced to 0.5 ml of the end-point dilution; current standard method doses were advanced to the highest tolerated dose. The median maintenance dose for Rinkel method patients was 0.5 ml of 1:1,562,500 w/v (0.001 μg AgE), and for current standard method patients was 0.3 ml of 1:100 w/v (11 μg AgE). An additional unmatched group of nine similar patients received Rinkel method immunotherapy in both 1978 and 1979. Under the conditions of this study, the current standard method of immunotherapy produced a significant decrease in ragweed hay fever symptom-medication scores, increase in antiragweed IgG levels, and decrease in seasonal rise in antiragweed IgE levels in comparison with the effects of either Rinkel method or placebo. The effect of the Rinkel method on these variates was not significantly different from the effects of placebo.