The Quality of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Canada: A Report of the Canadian Cardiac Rehab Registry

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) significantly reduces morbidity and mortality compared with usual care. CR quality indicators (QIs) have recently been established in Canada. This article presents an assessment of real-world CR program achievement of process and outcome QIs in Canada, using the Canadian Cardiac Rehab Registry (CCRR). The CR QIs were developed through the Canadian Cardiovascular Society's Best Practice Methodology. After reconciling the QI with CCRR definitions, it was identified that 14 (46.7%) of the 30 QIs could be assessed through the CCRR. There were 5447 patient records from 11 CR programs in the CCRR. Wait times exceeded the 30-day QI target, at a median of 84 days from referral to enrollment. Assessment of QIs of blood pressure (90%) and adiposity (85%) were high, however assessment of QIs for lipids (41%), blood glucose among patients with diabetes (23%), and depression overall (13%) were low. A majority of the participants (68%) achieved the half metabolic equivalent increase in the exercise capacity QI from CR program entry to exit. Of smokers, only 61% were offered smoking cessation therapy. Thirty percent of participants were offered stress management. The CR program completion QI was met in 90% of patients. Areas for care and quality improvement have been identified for the CR community in Canada. Efforts to engage more CR programs assess a greater number of QIs, and to feed back the findings to participating programs quarterly are currently under way.     

Universal access: But when? Treating the right patient at the right time: Access to cardiac rehabilitation

The Canadian Cardiovascular Society formed an Access to Care Working Group ('Working Group') in the spring of 2004. The mandate of the group was to use the best science and information to establish reasonable triage categories and safe wait times for access to common cardiovascular services and procedures. The present commentary presents the rationale for benchmarks for cardiac rehabilitation (CR) services. The Working Group's search for evidence included: a full literature review of the efficacy of CR, and the factors affecting access and referral to CR; a review of existing guidelines for access to CR; and a national survey of 14 CR programs across Canada undertaken in May 2005 to solicit information on referral to, and wait times for, CR. The Working Group also reviewed the results of The Ontario Cardiac Rehabilitation Pilot Project (2002) undertaken by the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario, which reported the average and median wait times for CR. Some international agencies have formulated their own guidelines relating to the optimal wait time for the onset of CR. However, due to the limited amount of supporting literature, these guidelines have generally been formed as consensus statements. The Canadian national survey showed that few programs had guidelines for individual programs. The Cardiac Care Network of Ontario pilot project reported that the average and median times from a cardiac event to the intake into CR were 99 and 70 days, respectively. The national survey of sampled CR programs also revealed quite remarkable differences across programs in terms of the length of time between first contact to first attendance and to commencement of exercise. Programs that required a stress test before program initiation had the longest wait for exercise initiation. Some patients need to be seen within a very short time frame to prevent a marked deterioration in their medical or psychological state. In some cases, early intervention and advocacy may reduce the risk of loss of employment. Or, there may be profound disturbances in the patient's family as a result of the cardiac event. For other patient groups, preferable wait times vary from one to 30 days, and acceptable wait times vary from seven to 60 days. All cardiovascular disease patients require core aspects of CR services. Patients who would derive benefit from formal CR programs should be provided the opportunity, given the proven efficacy and cost effectiveness of CR.     

Pan-canadian cardiovascular data definitions and quality indicators: a status update

After the 2009 publication of Building a Heart Healthy Canada, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society was commissioned to address a long-standing information gap related to the compatibility and comparability of data on the quality of cardiovascular care in Canada. Through collaboration between the Canadian Institute for Health Information, the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, the Public Health Agency of Canada, and 5 regional cardiovascular registries, 2 committees were tasked with developing standardized cardiovascular data definitions and quality indicators. The work culminated in national consensus on the definitions of 55 patient, disease, and therapeutic variables (core and optional) to facilitate cardiovascular care comparisons within and across Canada. Supplemental data definition chapters were then developed on acute coronary syndrome and coronary angiography/revascularization, with chapters on heart failure and atrial fibrillation electrophysiology to follow. This foundational work led to a critical appraisal of cardiac quality indicator development initiatives via the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) Quality Indicator tool, followed by the development of quality indicator catalogues on heart failure and atrial fibrillation. These indicators will be embedded within the clinical practice guidelines of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society, facilitating national comparisons across Canada on cardiovascular disease incidence, prevalence, patterns and quality of care, and clinical outcomes. This methodology-achieving national stakeholder consensus on a standardized process for the development and selection of cardiovascular quality indicators-illustrates the capacity to reach agreement by drawing on expertise and research across diverse organizational mandates and agendas, potentially contributing to improved cardiovascular care and outcomes for patients.     

Current Trends in Reducing Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors From Around the World: Focus on Cardiac Rehabilitation in Brazil

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in Brazil. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a program composed of structured exercise training, comprehensive education and counseling to positively impact functional, psychological, social, and quality of life aspects in these patients. However, the delivery of formal CR programs is limited to major metropolitan centers in Brazil and does not exist in much of the national territory, specifically in the North and Northeast regions. Barriers to the inclusion of qualified patients are lack of referral by the health professionals, as well as transportation difficulties, low income, lack of insurance coverage, and low educational level. Government efforts to implement CR programs on a broader scale, to reach a larger portion of the CVD population, are imperative. Additional research must be focused on the assessment of CR referral and adherence patterns as well as the effectiveness of different CR delivery models.     

Issues influencing development of the Canadian Cardiovascular Information Network

The 1995 Consensus Conference of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society on "Indications for and Access to Revascularization" recommended that Canadian centres with invasive cardiovascular facilities should participate in a national observational database that monitors the selection of patients, as well as evaluate outcomes. The Canadian Cardiovascular Society, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, and Health Canada with IBM as a partner, initiated a process to identify factors influencing the development of the Canadian Cardiovascular Information Network. IBM's "Business Discovery Methodology" was adapted for health care. Structured interviews with representatives of health organizations, cardiovascular databases and research institutes were conducted across Canada, followed by a workshop to identify goals, issues and challenges. Participants identified goals for a cardiovascular database (eg, evidence-based decision-making), project related issues (eg, respecting the integrity of existing databases) and health care related issues (eg, cardiac waiting lists). Challenges included initial mistrust between representatives of provincial cardiovascular databases and national agencies, and a lack of sustained funding. A Project Team was formed to address 'cardiac waiting lists'. Analysis of Alberta and Ontario data identified differences in definitions, such as when the waiting time for bypass surgery began, that impeded detailed comparisons. Development of a centralized national database was not feasible at this time for political, technical and financial reasons. However, provincial cardiovascular database representatives agreed to work together and to share aggregate data and analyses. A first step toward developing a national surveillance system for cardiovascular services will be achieving consensus about standardizing data definitions. This process will require sustained funding.     

Treating the right patient at the right time: Access to echocardiography in Canada

The Canadian Cardiovascular Society is the national professional society for cardiovascular specialists and researchers in Canada. In the spring of 2004, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Council formed the Access to Care Working Group ('Working Group') to use the best science and information available to establish reasonable triage categories and safe wait times for access to common cardiovascular procedures. The Working Group decided to publish a series of commentaries to initiate a structured national discussion on this important issue, and the present commentary proposes recommended wait times for access to echocardiography. 'Emergent' echocardiograms should be performed within 24 h, 'urgent' within seven days and 'scheduled' (elective) within 30 days. A framework for a solution-oriented approach to improve access is presented.     

Cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention services in Ontario: recommendations from a consensus panel

The Cardiac Care Network of Ontario Consensus Panel on Cardiac Rehabilitation and Secondary Prevention drew on the literature and its own expertise, and surveyed existing cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention (CR) services in Ontario to make recommendations for the delivery of CR services in Ontario. This report, which is not an official position paper for the Canadian Cardiovascular Society, presents these recommendations. The key recommendations were a regional coordination model for the delivery of CR services that would provide CR close to home and promote access to CR in groups traditionally underrepresented in CR; high quality central data collection; the creation of a provincial CR registry to allow future planning, coordination, monitoring and evaluation of CR services in Ontario; and the establishment of specific CR program funding from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care.     

Introduction to the Canadian Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Team's (CCORT) Canadian Cardiovascular Atlas project

The Canadian Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Team's (CCORT) Canadian Cardiovascular Atlas project was developed to provide Canadians with a national report on the state of cardiovascular health and health services in Canada. Written by a group of Canada's leading experts in cardiovascular outcomes research, the CCORT cardiac Atlas will cover a wide variety of topics ranging from cardiac risk factors and cardiac mortality rates to the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure and the outcomes of invasive cardiac procedures across Canada. Data in the Atlas will be presented at a national, provincial and health region level. The Atlas will be published as a series of 20 articles and chapters in future issues of The Canadian Journal of Cardiology and on CCORT's web site (www.ccort.ca). The journal version of the Atlas chapters will be written for a clinical audience and will include editorials written by invited experts, whereas the web-based version of each chapter will be written for a more general audience and will include additional supplemental information (for example, interactive colour maps and tables) that cannot be included in the journal version. Material from the Journal and the web will eventually be compiled into a book that will be distributed across Canada. This article serves as an introduction to the Atlas project and describes the rationale for and objectives of the CCORT national cardiac Atlas project.     

A novel process for updating recommendations for managing hypertension: rationale and methods

BACKGROUND: There are numerous hypertension consensus recommendations intended for practising physicians. However, recommendations in their current format have limited impact on improving hypertension control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A group of national societies, headed by the Canadian Hypertension Society, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, the Canadian Coalition for High Blood Pressure Prevention and Control, and Health Canada has developed strategies to maintain annually updated recommendations for hypertension management and to provide greater opportunities for their implementation into clinical practice. The process is overseen by a steering committee. Subcommittees have been formed for each of a list of topics seen as important to the control of hypertension. The subcommittees, with the aid of a central librarian, conduct annual literature reviews in accordance with Cochrane Collaboration strategies. Modified existing and new recommendations are forwarded to a group with expertise in clinical epidemiology. Grades of evidence are assigned to each recommendation. Revised recommendations based on the above process will be presented annually at the conjoint Canadian Hypertension Society/Canadian Cardiovascular Congress meeting. Under the leadership of the Cardiovascular Disease Division of the Laboratory Centre for Disease Control, Health Canada, a committee has been charged with the implementation process. CONCLUSIONS: The improvements of the current process over previous national hypertension recommendations are four-fold. First, the recommendations will be updated annually. Second, the methodology has been improved. Third, the grading system can be used in the evaluation of complex study designs. Finally, the implementation process is extended. The authors are optimistic that these changes will contribute to the improvement of hypertension control in the Canadian population.     

Quality of Cardiac Care in Canada: Recommendations for Building a Sustainable Future

Cardiovascular (CV) disease continues to present a significant disease and economic burden in Canada. To improve the quality of care and ensure sustainability of services, a national quality improvement initiative is required. The purpose of this analysis was to review the evidence for public reporting (PR) and external benchmarking (EB) to improve patient outcomes, and to recommend a strategy to improve CV care in Canada. To incorporate recent literature, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) commissioned the Institute of Health Economics to provide a rapid update on the literature of PR and EB. The review showed that EB is more likely to promote positive effects, such as improved mortality, morbidity, and evidence-based clinical practice, and to limit negative effects, such as access restrictions or unintended provider behaviour associated with some forms of “top-down” PR. On the basis of these findings, this we recommend the following: (1) secure funding for the provincial collection of CV quality indicators and the creation of annual National CV Quality Reports; (2) enhance the culture of using CV quality indicator data for continuous quality improvement and opportunities for national or regional EB and sharing best practices; and (3) implement ongoing evaluation and revision of CCS clinical practice guidelines incorporating key quality indicators. This is already under way to a limited extent by the CCS with its Quality Project, but intentional, sustained support needs to be secured to enhance this ongoing effort and improve the quality of CV care for all Canadians.     

Canadian Cardiovascular Society and Canadian Thoracic Society position statement on pulmonary arterial hypertension

The Canadian Cardiovascular Society and the Canadian Thoracic Society requested a position statement on pulmonary arterial hypertension from leading Canadian experts. The present document is intended to act as an update for the clinician, to provide a template for the initial evaluation of patients, to enable understanding of current therapeutic paradigms based on approved indications for Canada, to highlight new therapies on the horizon, and to state the positions of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society and the Canadian Thoracic Society on resource management for pulmonary arterial hypertension in Canada.     

The Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Quality Report: A Call to Arms for Improving Quality in Canada

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a disruptive technology that has dramatically changed the way clinicians care for patients with aortic stenosis. In 15 short years, this technology has progressed from first-in-human to the standard of care for high-risk and inoperable patients with aortic stenosis. In 2016 the Canadian Cardiovascular Society published the first ever report of quality of care for TAVI in Canada. This report provided multiple insights into evaluating such care delivered to Canadians and the challenges that lie ahead. In this article, we summarize these challenges and encourage cardiologists to join the call to arms for improving quality of TAVI care in Canada.     

Cardiac rehabilitation: the forgotten intervention.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of cardiac patients' demographic and health characteristics on physicians' cardiac rehabilitation (CR) referral practice and patients' attendance at such programs. DESIGN: A retrospective, systematic review of consecutive health records. SETTING: A tertiary care centre and the two associated CR programs in a Western Canadian city. PATIENTS: One thousand, three hundred and twenty-eight adult patients (21 years of age or older) discharged following acute myocardial infarction, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and/or coronary artery bypass graft surgery between September 1, 1996 and August 31, 1997. MAIN RESULTS: There were 1245 surviving patients. Evidence of attendance at a CR program was 28.4%, while auditable evidence of referral to a CR program was 23.9%. Stepwise logistic regression revealed that ability to speak English (OR 9.56) living in a city (OR 3.97) and current smoking (OR 1.51) were associated with an increased likelihood, whereas having a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma (OR 0.53), being 70 years of age or older (OR 0.42), having a current admission for PTCA (OR 0.32) and having a history of neurological or cognitive impairment (OR 0.26) were associated with a decreased likelihood of CR attendance. Sex, nature of coronary artery disease risk factors, incidence of postevent complications and pre-event cardiac status (including New York Heart Association status and number of previous events) were not associated with patients' CR attendance. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that there is an inconsistent and poorly documented approach to referral of patients to CR programs for reasons that remain unclear. These findings provide a foundation for development and testing of enhanced referral mechanisms and of innovative means to provide rehabilitation services to patients who are at risk for not being referred to or attending CR programs.     

Translation of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Cardiovascular Screening and Care of Athletes Program Into Practice

In the absence of systematic cardiovascular preparticipation screening (PPS) practices in Canada, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society and Canadian Heart Rhythm Society published a joint position statement outlining PPS recommendations for competitive athletes in an effort to standardize screening. The Queen’s University Cardiovascular Screening and Care of Athletes Program aimed to translate these recommendations into practice. Screening packages were administered to athletes in 2017 and 2018. Each package required completion of a medical/history questionnaire, a physician’s examination, and 12-lead electrocardiogram performed by the athlete’s primary care physician. A tiered approach to screening, as recommended by the position statement, was implemented. A multidisciplinary team flagged at-risk athletes and determined the need for follow-up testing and participation eligibility. Over a 2-year period, 517 varsity athletes were screened, with 438 (84.7%) completing all recommended screening components. Analysis of completed packages resulted in 114 (26.0%) athletes flagged for initial review. After subsequent review by an emergency care physician, only 12 (2.7%) athletes required further referral to cardiology for assessment or further testing. All athletes referred for cardiology assessment were cleared for participation, except for one, who was eventually cleared after a shared decision-making process and cardiovascular intervention. The Queen’s University Cardiovascular Screening and Care of Athletes Program shows the successful implementation of a cardiovascular PPS program that used shared decision-making and a multidisciplinary approach to screening, allowing for efficiency and effective resource utilization.     

Improving Quality of Congenital Heart Disease Research in Canada: Standardizing Nomenclature Across Canada

In an effort to improve the quality of interinstitutional and nation-wide research into congenital heart disease (CHD) in Canada, the authors propose the national implementation of a single nomenclature list for CHD as a first step towards achieving a common disease classification system in all Canadian institutions that deal with congenital heart malformations. The authors offer a brief overview of the history and state of nomenclature for CHD in Canada and recommend the national use of the CHD diagnostic list that was recently finalized by the International Society for Nomenclature of Paediatric and Congenital Heart Disease. This list was submitted to the World Health Organization for incorporation into the 11th iteration of the International Classification of Diseases and was recently translated into French by members of the International Society for Nomenclature of Paediatric and Congenital Heart Disease. The bilingual list of the 11th iteration of the International Classification of Diseases CHD terms is published online in this issue of the Canadian Journal of Cardiology. The national standardization of the nomenclature pertaining to CHD using the bilingual list of terms published herein will optimize national efforts to establish longitudinal CHD cohorts, capitalizing on Canada’s health care infrastructure and solidifying Canadian leadership in CHD research.     

Automated Referral to Cardiac Rehabilitation After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Is Associated With Modest Improvement in Program Completion

BackgroundCardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a guideline-indicated modality for reducing residual cardiovascular risk among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. However, many referred patients do not initiate or complete a CR program; even more patients are never even referred.MethodsAll post-CABG patients in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, from January 1, 1996, to March 31, 2016, were included. Data were obtained from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease and TotalCardiology Rehabilitation databases. Automated referral to CR at discharge after CABG was instituted on July 1, 2007. We used interrupted time series analysis to evaluate the impact of automated referral on CR referral and completion rates and studied the association of these CR process markers with mortality.ResultsA total of 8,118 patients underwent CABG surgery during the study period: 5,103 before automation and 3,015 after automation. Automation increased referral rates from 39.5% to 75.0% (P < 0.001). Automated referral was associated with a 7.2% increase in CR completion in the overall population (33.3% vs 26.1%; P < 0.001). In adjusted models, CR referral alone was not associated with reduced mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.84, 95% CI 0.64-1.11), but CR completion was (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.31-0.61).ConclusionAutomated referral in post-CABG patients resulted in modest improvement in CR program completion. Therefore, even when CR referral is automated to include all eligible patients, additional strategies to support CR program enrollment and completion remain necessary to achieve the desired health benefits.     

Referral rate and outcomes of cardiac rehabilitation after cardiac catheterization in a large Canadian city

PURPOSE: The benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for patients with coronary artery disease are extensive and compelling, demonstrating reductions in mortality. However, some reports suggest that only 10% to 20% of eligible patients currently participate in formal CR programs. The purpose of this study was to identify the proportion of patients referred to CR in a large Canadian city, and to determine their statistically adjusted survival rates relative to patients not referred to CR. METHODS: Subjects eligible for this study included all adult residents with coronary artery disease from 1995 to 1999 in the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease registry. All 5,081 patients who survived 6 months or more after catheterization were included in the analysis. Survival data were adjusted using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Referral to a CR program (28.9% of patients) was significantly more likely for young male patients who had undergone a prior revascularization procedure, presented with an ejection fraction exceeding 50%, and did not report cerebrovascular, peripheral vascular, or renal disease. Crude hazard ratios indicated that referral to a CR program remained significantly associated with lower mortality after control was used for clinical, anatomic, treatment and comorbid conditions recorded at catheterization (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.90; P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the proven efficacy of CR in clinical trials, fewer than one third of the patients undergoing cardiac catheterization are referred to a CR program. The better survival outcomes noted for patients referred to CR suggests that there is an opportunity to improve care and outcomes through increased referral of patients to such programs.     

A Snapshot of Lipid-Reporting Practices in Canadian Clinical Laboratories: An Urgent Need for Harmonisation

To effectively implement the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) guidelines for dyslipidemia management into clinical laboratories, clear recommendations for lipid reporting are essential. In this study, the Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists Working Group on Reference Interval Harmonisation surveyed Canadian laboratories on adult lipid reporting practices to set a foundation for the development and implementation of harmonised lipid reporting across Canada. Key aspects of the survey asked laboratories: what reporting parameters were in place to assess lipid results; what interpretative comments were provided; whether nonfasting lipids were permitted and, if so, what strategy was used to document fasting status; and whether there was interest in implementing a harmonised lipid report. A total of 101 laboratories were represented by 24 respondents, as many responses were submitted by laboratory networks that included more than 1 laboratory. There was at least 1 response from 9 Canadian provinces and representation across 5 testing platforms. Upper and lower limits for lipid parameters and referenced source of limits varied substantially across laboratories, with only 56% of laboratories (9 respondents) referencing the 2016 CCS guidelines. Eighty-six percent of laboratories (19 respondents) report nonfasting lipids, although the method of documenting nonfasting status varied. Overall, 36% of laboratories (8 respondents) reported interest in implementing a harmonised lipid report. Assessment of current lipid-reporting practices supports the need for harmonised lipid reporting across Canada. Development of a harmonised lipid report for the adult population, consistent with up-to-date Canadian guidelines, will improve continuity of lipid test interpretation across Canada and improve clinical decision making.