Zolpidem: an update of its pharmacology, therapeutic efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of insomnia

Zolpidem is an imidazopyridine agent that is indicated for the short term (< or = 4 weeks) treatment of insomnia (recommended dosage 10 mg/day in adults and 5 or 10 mg/day in the elderly or patients with hepatic impairment). Data have shown that the hypnotic efficacy of zolpidem is generally comparable to that of the benzodiazepines flunitrazepam, flurazepam, nitrazepam, temazepam and triazolam as well as nonbenzodiazepine hypnotic agents such as zopiclone and trazodone in the treatment of elderly and adult patients with insomnia. The comparative efficacy of a recently available nonbenzodiazepine hypnotic zaleplon and zolpidem has yet to be established. There was no evidence of tolerance developing to the hypnotic effects of zolpidem in a number of studies of up to 6 months' duration. However, tolerance has been described in a few patients taking the drug at high dosages for periods of up to several years. Zolpidem is well tolerated in patients with insomnia and the most common adverse events are generally nausea, dizziness and drowsiness. Although zolpidem produced some psychomotor and memory impairment over the first few hours after administration, it had few next-day effects (including effects on daytime well-being and morning coordination). In this respect, it was comparable or superior to flunitrazepam and flurazepam and comparable to other benzodiazepines in patients with insomnia. Zolpidem appears to have a low potential for abuse. Conclusions: Zolpidem is effective and well tolerated in patients with insomnia, including the elderly. Studies have shown that zolpidem generally has similar efficacy to other hypnotics including benzodiazepines and zopiclone. Zolpidem appears to have minimal next-day effects on cognition and psychomotor performance when administered at bedtime. In addition, there is little evidence of tolerance to the hypnotic effects of zolpidem, or rebound insomnia or withdrawal symptoms after discontinuation of the drug when it is given as recommended (10 mg/day for < 1 month) or over longer periods.     

Comparative study of zopiclone,a novel hypnotic,and three benzodiazepines

Summary The hypnotic effect and tolerance of zopiclone 7.5 mg, nitrazepam 5 mg, flurazepam 30 mg, flunitrazepam 2 mg and placebo were compared in a one-night double blind study in 414 hospitalised patients who were to undergo an operation on the following day. Zopiclone was slightly superior to nitrazepam but was inferior both to flurazepam and flunitrazepam. All the active drugs differed clearly from placebo. The results from a subset of patients, excluding those who felt anxious either before treatment on the evening prior to the operation or on the following morning, were analysed separately. All the active products differed significantly from placebo; zopiclone was slightly less effective than the three benzodiazepines. All the benzodiazepines decreased the precentage of patients feeling anxious about the operation by about 25%, zopiclone by about 10% and placebo did not change it at all.     

Zopiclone. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy as an hypnotic

Zopiclone is the first of the cyclopyrrolones, a new class of psychotherapeutic agents possessing a pharmacological profile of high efficacy and low toxicity similar to that of the benzodiazepines. Binding is thought to occur to the benzodiazepine receptor complex, or to a site closely linked to this complex. Although zopiclone exhibits anticonvulsant, muscle relaxant and anxiolytic properties in animals, it finds better use as an hypnotic because of marked sedating effects. In clinical trials, zopiclone (usually 7.5 mg) improved sleep in chronic insomniacs similarly to nitrazepam 5 mg, flurazepam 15 to 30 mg, triazolam 0.5 mg and temazepam 20 mg, but in a single study was slightly less effective than flunitrazepam 2 mg in some evaluation criteria. Sleep induction before surgical procedures in hospitalised patients is satisfactory with zopiclone, but when the drugs are administered a few hours before surgery, diazepam appears to be more effective in alleviating preoperative anxiety. Minimal impairment of psychomotor skills and mental acuity occurs in the morning after a bedtime dose of zopiclone, which has a short half-life of about 5 hours and no long acting metabolites. No serious side effects have been reported in the relatively small number of patients studied to date; the development of 'bitter taste' does not deter patients from continuing therapy. Thus, with its short duration of action zopiclone is a useful alternative to other hypnotics, especially in patients intolerant of residual effects the morning after taking an hypnotic.     

Loprazolam. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy in insomnia

Loprazolam is a 1,4-benzodiazepine with hypnotic properties, advocated for use in acute or chronic insomnia. As loprazolam has a half-life of 7 to 8 hours in healthy adults it may have advantages over longer-acting hypnotics, particularly when residual sedative effects on the day after ingestion are undesirable, although at doses greater than 1 mg residual sedation may occur. In addition, it may reduce daytime anxiety, following a hypnotic dose the night before, more effectively than the short-acting drug, triazolam. In short term comparative studies loprazolam was clearly superior to placebo, and was at least as effective as triazolam, flurazepam, nitrazepam, flunitrazepam or temazepam in hastening sleep onset, reducing nocturnal awakenings and increasing total sleep duration and quality. In the small number of patients with chronic insomnia who have received extended treatment with loprazolam, no evidence of tolerance has occurred, although rebound insomnia was evident 3 days after drug withdrawal in several studies. Thus, with its 'intermediate' elimination half-life, loprazolam would appear to have some potential advantages over both long- and short-acting hypnotics in selected patients, although further studies are needed to fully elucidate its place in therapy.     

Triazolam: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in patients with insomnia

Triazolam is a triazolobenzodiazepine with hypnotic properties, advocated for use in acute or chronic insomnia, situational insomnia in hospitalised patients, and insomnia associated with other disease states. As triazolam has a relatively short half-life of about 2 to 3 hours in healthy subjects and has only 1 short acting active metabolite, alpha-hydroxytriazolam, it would seem more suitable as an hypnotic than longer acting drugs such as flurazepam, nitrazepam or flunitrazepam, particularly when residual sedative effects on the day after ingestion are undesirable. Thus, with usual hypnotic doses of triazolam (0.25 or 0.5 mg) impairment of psychomotor and cognitive function is generally not carried over into the day after ingestion, although at doses of 1 mg or greater, residual effects may appear. In short term comparative studies triazolam was clearly superior to a placebo, and was at lest as effective as flurazepam, or other benzodiazepines such as nitrazepam or diazepam, in hastening sleep onset, reducing nocturnal awakenings, and increasing sleep duration. In other studies it was often superior to chloral hydrate, methyprylone or quinalbarbitone (secobarbital). In a small number of patients with chronic insomnia receiving extended treatment with triazolam in a clinical setting or in some sleep laboratory studies, no evidence of tolerance occurred; however, some evidence of reduced effect with repeated administration has been reported in one sleep laboratory study. Thus, a definitive statement about the likelihood of tolerance occurring on repeated administration is difficult to make at this time.     

Assessment of benzodiazepine receptor heterogeneity in vivo: apparent pA2 and pKB analyses from behavioral studies

This review aims at providing a critical assessment of the effects of the most widely used benzodiazepine (flurazepam, flunitrazepam, temazepam, triazolam) and non-benzodiazepine (zopiclone and zolpidem) hypnotic drugs, based on the recording of polysomnographic variables. In the light of newly acquired neurophysiological data on the microstructure of sleep, this paper reconsiders the problem of insomnia and the current ideas on polysomnography and hypnotic drugs.     

Residual effects of hypnotics: epidemiology and clinical implications

The risk of "hangover" effects, e.g. residual daytime sleepiness and impairment of psychomotor and cognitive functioning the day after bedtime administration, is one of the main problems associated with the use of hypnotics. However, the severity and duration of these effects varies considerably between hypnotics and is strongly dependent on the dose administered. This article reviews epidemiological evidence on the effect of hypnotics on patients' risk for accidents such as traffic accidents, falls and hip fractures (i.e. end-points for residual effects). Information on the duration and severity of residual effects of 11 hypnotics (flunitrazepam, flurazepam, loprazolam, lormetazepam, midazolam, nitrazepam, temazepam, triazolam, zaleplon, zolpidem and zopiclone) was derived from expert ratings, a meta-analysis and actual driving studies. Epidemiological studies show that the risks of an accident increase with increasing half-life of the hypnotic, but that the use of hypnotics with a short half-life, such as triazolam, zopiclone and zolpidem, can also be associated with increased risks. A summary of results from experimental studies should enable prescribing clinicians to compare residual effects of the various hypnotics at different doses and select the one considered most favourable in this respect for the individual patient. This information should also enable them to inform patients more adequately about the likelihood and duration of residual effects of a specific hypnotic dose.     

Performance and mood following partial sleep deprivation: A randomized,double-blind crossover study of zopiclone,triazolam, flunitrazepam,ethanol and placebo

The effects of zopiclone 7.5 and 15 mg, triazolam 0.25 and 0.5 mg, flunitrazepam 1 and 2 mg, ethanol and placebo on performance, mood and sleep onset latency after partial sleep deprivation, were compared in a randomized, double-blind, crossover, single-dose study. Sixteen healthy volunteers of both sexes, aged 21–31 years, were included in the study. The overall assessment of the total psychological measurement indicated that zopiclone 7.5 mg, triazolam 0.25 mg and ethanol (C_max = 0.40 parts per thousand) did not affect the daytime performance of an unacceptable degree even when given late at light. The findings for flunitrazepam 1 mg were not so uniform, but also seemed acceptable. Zopiclone 15 mg, triazolam 0.5 mg and flunitrazepam 2 mg were rated as not acceptable alternatives. No significant differences were shown concerning mood. The overall assessment for sleep onset latency and subjective alertness indicated that zopiclone 7.5 mg and triazolam 0.25 mg had a more appropriate profile than the other drugs and doses tested.     

Behavioral and electroencephalographic effects of zopiclone, a cyclopyrrolone derivative

Behavioral effects of zopiclone were investigated in mice and rats and compared with the data on diazepam, nitrazepam and flurazepam. The electroencephalographic effect of the drug was also examined in unanesthetized rabbits with chronic electrode implants and compared with that of diazepam. The present results indicate that zopiclone possesses pharmacological properties qualitatively similar to benzodiazepines, which are characterized by potent anticonflict and antiaggressive effects and much weaker anticonvulsant, muscle relaxant, ataxiogenic, sedative and anesthesia potentiating effects; the properties of this drug were compared with those of diazepam, nitrazepam and flurazepam. Zopiclone suppressed the EEG arousal responses and inhibited afterdischarges induced by electrical stimulation of the hippocampus and amygdala. The effects of zopiclone on EEG and afterdischarges were approximately 1/10 those of diazepam.     

Rebound insomnia: a critical review

Rebound insomnia, a worsening of sleep compared with pretreatment levels, has been reported upon discontinuation of short half-life benzodiazepine hypnotics. This paper reviews the existing sleep laboratory studies for the presence or absence of rebound insomnia following treatment with triazolam, temazepam, and flurazepam in insomniac patients or poor sleepers and, when possible, in normals. The results indicate that rebound insomnia is a distinct possibility after discontinuation of triazolam in both insomniacs and normal controls. Compared with baseline, disturbed sleep was reported in insomniacs or poor sleepers for the first 1 or 2 nights of withdrawal in seven of nine polygraphically recorded sleep studies following triazolam 0.5 mg and in one of two studies following triazolam 0.25 mg. In one study conducted in normal volunteers, rebound insomnia was observed following triazolam 0.5 mg but not triazolam 0.25 mg. In another study, which used subjective reports of sleep rather than polygraphic recordings, rebound insomnia was significantly attenuated after triazolam 0.5 mg by tapering the dose over 4 nights. The risk of rebound insomnia after temazepam 15 or 30 mg was low. In keeping with its long elimination half-life, flurazepam (30 mg) continued to exert beneficial effects for the first 2-3 withdrawal nights, but the possibility of a mild rebound insomnia cannot be dismissed during the intermediate withdrawal period (nights 4-10) following prolonged, consecutive, nightly administration (more than 30 nights). The benzodiazepine hypnotics are generally preferred over other types (barbiturates or nonbenzodiazepine, nonbarbiturate), but there are advantages and disadvantages related to half-life of the benzodiazepines. The risk of rebound insomnia is greater with the short half-life as compared with the long half-life benzodiazepines.     

Brotizolam. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy as an hypnotic

Brotizolam is a new thienotriazolodiazepine derivative with a pharmacological profile similar to that of benzodiazepines. It is indicated for use as an hypnotic in the management of insomnia, although it also has anticonvulsant, antianxiety and muscle relaxant properties in animals. In clinical trials brotizolam 0.125 to 0.5mg improved sleep in insomniacs similarly to nitrazepam 2.5 and 5mg, flunitrazepam 2mg and triazolam 0.25mg, whilst brotizolam 0.5mg was shown to be superior to flurazepam 30mg in some studies. Brotizolam is an effective hypnotic for hospital patients awaiting surgery, in whom it also reduces anxiety. Brotizolam has an elimination half-life of about 5 hours, which is 'intermediate' compared with the shorter-acting hypnotic, triazolam, and longer-acting benzodiazepines. Consequently, it is able to induce sleep without producing early morning rebound insomnia, and can also maintain sleep throughout the night. Brotizolam at dosages below 0.5mg at night usually produced minimal morning drowsiness; no residual impairment of psychomotor performance occurs following dosages within the recommended range of 0.125 to 0.25 mg/kg. No serious side effects have been reported to date and the most frequently observed adverse experiences are drowsiness, headache and dizziness. Mild rebound insomnia may occur in some patients when treatment is stopped. Thus, brotizolam is a useful hypnotic which can be used in patients who have difficulty in falling asleep and also in patients who are troubled by night-time awakenings. Used in the recommended dosage it may be particularly useful for patients in whom daytime impairment of performance is unacceptable.     

A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of zopiclone 7.5 mg and temazepam 20 mg in insomnia

Zopiclone, a cyclopyrrolone with hypnotic properties was compared with temazepam and placebo in the treatment of insomnia. After a week's washout period, suitable subjects were allocated at random to zopiclone 7.5 mg or temazepam 20 mg or placebo for 2 weeks. Measurements of psychomotor function using the Leed's psychomotor tester and letter cancellation were carried out on day 0, 7 and 14. Sleep latency, duration of sleep and number of times waking during the night were recorded on a sleep diary filled by the subjects nightly. Forty-four subjects completed the trial, 15 taking zopiclone, 16 taking temazepam and 10 taking placebo. Both zopiclone and temazepam had significant hypnotic properties when compared to placebo. Zopiclone increased total sleep time in both weeks of the trial while temazepam increased sleep time in the first week only. There was no significant deterioration in psychomotor performance at the end of both weeks for zopiclone. Critical flicker fusion was significantly increased in subjects on temazepam. There were no abnormalities for both zopiclone and temazepam subjects in the blood picture, renal profile, liver function, urine and ECG before and after the study. Zopiclone is an effective hypnotic comparable to temazepam.     

Influence of different benzodiazepines on the experimental morphine abstinence syndrome

The abuse of benzodiazepines by narcotic addicts has been well documented. However, the pharmacological basis of this abuse is not clear. In this study the effects of different benzodiazepines (flunitrazepam: 0.5, 1 and 2 mg/kg; nitrazepam: 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5 and 10 mg/kg; diazepam: 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5 and 10 mg/kg; chlordiazepoxide: 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5 and 10 mg/kg; and triazolam: 0.5, 1 and 2 mg/kg) on the morphine withdrawal syndrome in mice have been compared. Drugs were administered 30 min before naloxone-induced withdrawal. All benzodiazepines tested induced similar changes in some of the signs of morphine abstinence: decreased jumping behavior and increased wet dog shake frequency. Jumping behavior was particularly decreased by triazolam and wet dog shakes were mainly increased by flunitrazepam and nitrazepam. Forepaw treading was reduced by flunitrazepam, diazepam and triazolam, increased by nitrazepam and not changed by chlordiazepoxide. Tremor was effectively reduced by diazepam but less reliably by the other benzodiazepines. Teeth chattering was reduced by flunitrazepam and diazepam. These results indicate that benzodiazepines can interfere with the expression of the morphine withdrawal syndrome.     

Determination of benzodiazepines in oral fluid using LC-MS-MS

A rapid, simple, highly sensitive procedure for the simultaneous analysis of bromazepam, alprazolam, clonazepam, lorazepam, oxazepam, diazepam, midazolam, flurazepam, flunitrazepam, nordiazepam, triazolam, temazepam, nitrazepam, and chlordiazepoxide in oral fluid is described, using liquid chromatography coupled to a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer in positive electrospray mode. Benzodiazepines in oral fluid samples (1 mL) were analyzed using the Quantisal collection device, quantified using solid-phase extraction, and detected using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection. For confirmation, two transitions were monitored and one ion ratio determined, which was within 20% of the ratio for known calibration standards. The limits of quantitation ranged from 0.5-5 ng/mL of neat oral fluid; the intraday precision of the assays (n=5) ranged from 2.8-7.29%; and the interday precision ranged from 1.42-6.8% (n=5). The percentage recovery of the drugs from the collection pads ranged from a low of 81.4% for midazolam to the highest of 90.17% for nitrazepam. The procedure can be applied to authentic oral fluid specimens.     

Zopiclone versus flurazepam in insomnia: prolonged administration and withdrawal

Zopiclone (7.5 mg), a cyclopyrrolone derivative with a 6.5 h half-life, and flurazepam (30 mg) were compared to placebo in a randomized double-blind study involving 36 adult patients suffering from insomnia. All previous psychotropic drugs were discontinued 1 week prior to the study. During 4 weeks, 12 patients received zopiclone, 12 flurazepam and the others placebo. Thereafter, all patients received single-blind placebo for 3 nights. Rapidity of sleep onset, sleep duration, frequency of nocturnal awakenings, psychomotor coordination and side-effects were assessed daily with a questionnaire and a symptom checklist. The results of the study suggest that zopiclone 7.5 mg was at least as potent as flurazepam 30 mg in inducing and maintaining sleep. Both drugs maintained their efficacy during the 4 weeks of treatment. However, the two drugs differed in that flurazepam impaired psychomotor coordination whereas zopiclone did not demonstrate daytime protracted effects on psychomotor performance. Upon discontinuation of drug treatment, score values of the different sleep parameters under study returned to the baseline values. Side-effects were mild and consistent with earlier studies.     

Zopiclone and triazolam in insomnia associated with generalized anxiety disorder: a placebo-controlled evaluation of efficacy and daytime anxiety

In a double-blind placebo-controlled study, following a 1 week washout, 75 outpatients suffering from generalized anxiety disorder with severe insomnia as the target symptom were randomly assigned to 4 weeks of treatment with zopiclone 7.5 mg, triazolam 0.5 mg or placebo at bedtime. Zopiclone was significantly better than placebo on most sleep parameters. Triazolam tended to be superior to placebo, but its superiority was significant only on the sleep induction factor. Triazolam-treated patients presented significantly more day-time-interdose anxiety than zopiclone as assessed by the weekly HARS and Clinical Global Assessment of Anxiety. Although daytime-interdose anxiety was observed with both drugs, this treatment emergent symptom was more frequent and severe with triazolam. Side-effects were of a mild to moderate intensity for both zopiclone and triazolam; however, taste perversion frequently appeared with zopiclone. Although both drugs share similar pharmacological properties and bind to benzodiazepine receptors, they differ significantly with respect to side-effects and daytime anxiety.     

Double-blind,placebo-controlled study comparing effects of zopiclone and temazepam on cognitive functioning of insomniacs

The purpose of this study was to compare the cognitive effect of two medications frequently prescribed to patients suffering from insomnia. Using a double-blind design, we evaluated three parallel groups of 20 insomniac patients treated over a period of 3 weeks with zopiclone, temazepam and placebo, respectively. Our hypothesis was that the impact of zopiclone 7.5 mg/day on cognitive functioning would be minimal 12 h after administration and that temazepam 30 mg/day would affect explicit memory, as is the case with other benzodiazepines. Patients were assessed at baseline following a 1-week, single-blind placebo-intake period, and again at the end of each of the 3 weeks of the comparative phase. Then, in order to estimate the severity and duration of potential rebound insomnia, patients were again assessed following another 1-week, single-blind placebo-washout period at the end of the 3 weeks of treatment. The overall duration of the study for each patient was thus 5 weeks. The instruments of measure used were the Hamilton scale for anxiety, daily self-rating questionnaire for assessment of sleep onset, duration and quality, and two large batteries of psychometric tests. The first of these batteries assessed memory and included span tests for short-term memory, cued recall tasks for long-term explicit memory, and a word-completion task for implicit memory; the second measured attention and concentration through the assessment of alertness, sustained attention and divided attention. The sleep and anxiety results obtained confirm the findings of previous research. Zopiclone and temazepam possess a clinically significant hypnotic activity, with no rebound insomnia or anxiety, during the week of drug withdrawal. The results indicate that the two hypnotic drugs studied have little impact on cognitive functioning. We can therefore conclude that at the doses administered over the 3 weeks, the two hypnotic drugs in question are relatively safe and efficacious in the treatment of insomnia and enable patients to enjoy a good quality of life. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Development and validation of an EI–GC–MS method for the determination of benzodiazepine drugs and their metabolites in blood: Applications in clinical and forensic toxicology

Benzodiazepines are used widely in daily clinical practice, due to their multiple pharmacological actions. The frequent problems associated with the wide use of benzodiazepines, as well as the multiple incidents of poisonings, led to the necessity for the development of a precise, sensitive and rapid method for the simultaneous determination of the 23 most commonly used benzodiazepines (diazepam, nordiazepam, oxazepam, bromazepam, alprazolam, lorazepam, medazepam, flurazepam, fludiazepam, tetrazepam, chlordiazepoxide, clobazam, midazolam, flunitrazepam, 7-amino-flunitrazepam, triazolam, prazepam, nimetazepam, nitrazepam, temazepam, lormetazepam, clonazepam, camazepam) in blood. A gas chromatographic method combined with mass spectrometric detection was developed, optimized and validated for the determination of the above substances. This method includes liquid–liquid extraction with chloroform at pH 9 and two stages of derivatization using tetramethylammonium hydroxide and propyliodide (propylation), as well as a mixture of triethylamine:propionic anhydride (propionylation). The recoveries were higher than 74% for all the benzodiazepines. The calibration curves were linear within the dynamic range of each benzodiazepine with a correlation coefficient higher than 0.9981. The limits of detection and quantification for each analyte were statistically calculated from the relative calibration curves. Accuracy and precision were also calculated and were found to be less than 8.5% and 11.1%, respectively. The developed method was successfully applied for the investigation of both forensic and clinical toxicological cases of accidental and suicidal poisoning.     

Prescribing short-acting hypnosedatives. Current recommendations from a safety perspective.

The duration of action of hypnosedative drugs is mainly determined by their pharmacokinetic properties. The ideal drug should induce sleep within 30 min and maintain a normal pattern of sleep for 6 to 8h, with little or no residual effects the next morning. Clinically, 4 types of insomnia can be distinguished: prolonged latency, 1 to 2 long periods of wakefulness, frequent short awakenings and early morning awakening. An ultra-short-acting drug (2 to 3h), such as triazolam, is useful for prolonged latency. Temazepam, lormetazepam and loprazolam provide more prolonged effects (8 to 10h). These benzodiazepines are not free of daytime adverse effects, particularly drowsiness, dependency potential, rebound insomnia and habituation to the drug effect. Zopiclone and zolpidem are new nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics that are as effective as benzodiazepines but without the problems associated with the latter. They produce a more normal electroencephalogram sleep pattern and so would seem to approach to the ideal hypnosedative for the future. However only further clinical trials and widespread use in practice will determine whether they will live up to this potential.     

Double-blind study on the hypnotic and antianxiety effects of zopiclone compared with nitrazepam in the treatment of insomnia

The effects of zopiclone (7.5 mg/per os/day), a new non-benzodiazepine drug, on anxiety levels, time of sleep induction, hours of sleep, number of nocturnal arousals, quality of sleep and of daytime arousal were evaluated by using psychometric ratings. A random double-blind cross-over study versus nitrazepam (5.0 mg/per os/day) was performed on 20 patients affected by insomnia and generalized anxiety disorder (DSM III-R). The effects were evaluated by using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety, the Toulouse-Pieron Attention Test and a time-signed quantitative scale for anxiety. The results of the trial confirmed the effectiveness of zopiclone in the treatment of insomnia with effects similar to nitrazepam on the quality and duration of sleep and number of nocturnal arousals, but with an improvement in all the other parameters.