Endoscopic Closure of Acute Esophageal Perforations

Esophageal leak is a life-threatening problem that can result from spontaneous rupture of the esophagus, cancer, anastomotic dehiscence after surgery, or as a complication of endoscopy. During the last decade, developments in the minimally invasive endoluminal approach to the management of esophageal leaks include utilization of endoscopy not only for diagnosis but also for closure of leaks with clips or sutures, bypass of the leaks with stents, and/or endoluminal drainage of mediastinal infection. The aim of this review is to summarize recent advances and the principles of endoscopic management of acute esophageal perforations.     

Surgery in thoracic esophageal perforation: primary repair is feasible

Prompt diagnosis and effective treatment are important for thoracic esophageal perforations. The decision for proper management is difficult especially when diagnosed late. However, there is an increasing consensus that primary repair provides good results for repair of thoracic esophageal perforations, which are not diagnosed on time. Primary repair for thoracic esophageal perforations was applied in 20 out of 25 consecutive patients. The time interval between perforation and repair was less than 24 h in six patients (group I), and more than 24 h in 14 patients (group II). The remaining five patients underwent esophagectomy with simultaneous or staged reconstruction because of incorrectable underlying esophageal pathology. Group I had much more iatrogenic causes (P < 0.05). Preoperative sepsis occurred only in group II (P=0.05) and was highly associated with Boerhaave syndrome (P=0.001). Regional viable tissue was used to reinforce the sites of primary repair (n=15, 75%). All of the postoperative morbidity (n=9, 45%) including esophageal leaks (n=6, 30%) and operative death (n=1, 5%) occurred in group II. In patients with postoperative leaks, five eventually healed, but one became a fistula that required reoperation. Primary healing with preservation of the native esophagus was achieved in all 19 patients except one operative death. In addition, the increased incidence of leak and morbidity did not lead to an increase in mortality. In the esophagectomy group, there was no mortality, but one minor suture leak. Regardless of the time interval between the injury and the operation, primary repair is recommended for non-malignant, thoracic, esophageal perforations, but not for anastomotic leaks. Reinforcement that may change the nature of a possible leak is also useful. For incorrectable underlying esophageal pathology, esophagectomy with simultaneous or staged reconstruction is indicated.     

The use of grape juice in the detection of esophageal leaks

BackgroundEsophagectomies and repair of esophageal perforations are operations used for a variety of clinical indications. Anastomotic leaks are a major post-operative complication after these procedures. At our institution, we routinely use grape juice to detect esophageal leaks in the post-operative setting in addition to other standard imaging modalities. We hypothesize that grape juice can provide similar diagnostic sensitivity and specificity to other modalities for leak detection.MethodsA retrospective review of all patients who underwent an esophagectomy or repair of esophageal perforations from 2013–2019 by the thoracic surgery service at our institution was performed. All patients underwent a barium swallow study, CT imaging or upper endoscopy, as well as ingesting purple grape juice on post-operative day 5 or greater. Purple grape juice observed in the tube thoracostomy drainage system was identified as a positive esophageal leak.ResultsSixty-four patients were included in the study period (25% female, 88% white, median age 62 years old). Sixty-three patients had both a barium swallow study and grape juice test, while one patient underwent CT imaging and grape juice study. Grape juice test sensitivity and specificity were found to be 80% and 98.3%, respectively.ConclusionsThis pilot study demonstrates the effectiveness of using grape juice in detecting esophageal leaks after esophageal operations in patients with tube thoracostomies. Grape juice may be cheaper and potentially less morbid than other studies performed to detect esophageal leaks. Further research is needed to justify the increased use of grape juice in patients who undergo esophageal operations.     

Factors influencing hepaticojejunostomy leak following pancreaticoduodenal resection; importance of anastomotic leak test

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Pancreatic fistula is a common complication after pancreaticoduodenostomy. Prevention of a concomitant bile leak from hepaticojejunostomy is important because it could lead to more serious complications including intraperitoneal abscess, subsequent sepsis and massive hemorrhage by activating pancreatic fistula. This study was designed to determine perioperative risk factors of the hepaticojejunostomy leak for the purpose of decreasing this morbidity. METHODOLOGY: Clinical records of 107 consecutive pancreaticoduodenal resections were reviewed. hepaticojejunostomy anastomoses were performed using absorbable sutures in an end-to-side, single-layer and interrupted fashion. A total of 8 presumed perioperative risk factors were analyzed. They included advanced age, low serum albumin, low serum total cholesterol, impaired glucose tolerance and placement of a biliary drainage catheter as preoperative factors, and dilated common hepatic duct and undone anastomotic leak test as intraoperative factors. In addition, transanastomotic stenting techniques including retrograde transhepatic bile drainage, T-tube and transjejunal drainage were compared with respect to hepaticojejunostomy leak rates. RESULTS: Hepaticojejunostomy leak was demonstrated in 9 patients (8%). Anastomotic leak testing only achieved statistical significance (p = 0.04). It is noteworthy that no hepaticojejunostomy leak developed among 28 patients who underwent this test through a retrograde transhepatic bile drainage catheter. In addition, the frequency of bile leaks (14/107) associated with the transanastomotic stenting techniques urged the necessity of appropriate intraperitoneal drain placement. CONCLUSIONS: Careful anastomotic procedures with a subsequent anastomotic leak test most effectively prevent hepaticojejunostomy leak after pancreaticoduodenal resection.     

Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiography after liver transplantation

Background: We report our current experience using endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the management of post-transplantation biliary tract complications.Methods: Twenty-three patients among 109 adult liver transplant recipients underwent retrograde cholangiography because of cholestasis (18 patients) or bile leaks (5 patients).Results: Eleven of 18 patients developed anastomotic strictures, all successfully dilated by plastic stents; one patient required Roux-en-Y revision due to recurrent cholangitis while stented. Three had biliary calculi extracted following sphincterotomy. Two developed intrahepatic ductal strictures secondary to severe rejection. One patient had hepatic artery thrombosis with a hilar stricture. One cholangiogram was normal.Three patients developed bile peritonitis following T-tube removal, all treated by sphincterotomy and nasobiliary drainage. Choledochal perforation resulting from an impacted T-tube limb was detected in two patients, both treated with sphincterotomy and nasobiliary drainage.Conclusions: Strictures within 3 months of surgery required 3 months of stenting; those occurring later required longer periods of time to respond. Bile leaks responded uniformly and rapidly to drainage. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography is a useful diagnostic and therapeutic intervention for posttransplantation biliary tract complications. (Gastrointest Endosc 1995;42:527-34.)     

Treatment of intrathoracic anastomotic leak by nose fistula tube drainage after esophagectomy for cancer

Esophageal anastomotic leak remains a lethal complication after esophagectomy for cancer. The aim of the present study is to describe an effective new management, nose fistula tube drainage (NFTD), to treat postoperative intrathoracic leaks. From July 2003 to August 2009, 41 of 4132 patients (0.99%) requiring transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal and cardiac carcinoma had developed an intrathoracic esophageal anastomotic leak in our hospital as well as another three patients with similar conditions from other hospitals, excluding three patients with gastric necrosis (two) and tracheo‐esophageal fistula (one); 23 patients were treated by NFTD, and the remaining 18 patients were treated by conventional chest tube drainage (CCTD). Clinical records of these patients were reviewed and analyzed, including the healing of the leak, mortality, and morbidity. In the NFTD group, 4 patients (17.4%) died, 1 patient (4.3%) required reoperation, and 18 patients (78.3%) healed. However, in the CCTD group, 3 patients (16.7%) died, 1 patient (5.5%) required reoperation, and 14 patients (77.8%) healed. As compared with the CCTD group, patients of the NFTD group had a shorter intensive care course (11.95 vs 33.62 days, P= 0.01) and hospital stay (39.74 vs 77.54 days, P= 0.02). Although this novel NFTD management did not significantly decrease mortality when compared with CCTD, it could gain more effective drainage than CCTD and eventually shorten hospital stay.     

食道覆膜支架治疗小儿食管急性穿孔:单中心临床经验回顾分析

目的采用食管覆膜支架(Sigma)治疗狭窄扩张时出现的小儿食管急性穿孔,分析覆膜支架治疗小儿食管急性穿孔的有效性。方法回顾性分析我院消化内镜中心2010年10月-2012年5月进行食管狭窄扩张的病例,只纳入扩张过程中发现的小儿食管急性穿孔,收集的资料包括人口统计资料、病因、诊断、治疗方式、并发症和预后等。结果 4例食管急性穿孔患儿,内镜操作过程中发现穿孔后,即刻放置食管覆膜支架堵漏,并给予广谱抗生素静滴及全胃肠外营养。次日钡餐造影观察堵漏情况,如果堵漏完全,可经胃管进食。支架平均放置14 d(10 d～21 d)后取除,平均住院时间为15 d(11 d～21 d),所有患儿均在放射线及内镜下证实食管穿孔痊愈。结论腔内食管支架放置是治疗内镜操作过程中食管急性穿孔的有效方法,能迅速封堵瘘口,避免急诊手术,降低患儿病死率。     

Endoscopic treatment of thoracic esophageal anastomotic leaks by using silicone-covered, self-expanding polyester stents

BACKGROUND: Surgery, as well as conservative treatment, in patients with clinically apparent intrathoracic esophageal anastomotic leaks often is associated with poor results and carries a high morbidity and mortality. The successful treatment of esophageal anastomotic insufficiencies and perforations when using covered, self-expanding metallic stents is described. METHODS: The feasibility and the outcome of endoscopic treatment of intrathoracic anastomotic leakages when using silicone-covered self-expanding polyester stents were investigated. Twelve consecutive patients presented with clinically apparent intrathoracic esophageal anastomotic leak caused by resection of an epiphrenic diverticulum (n = 1), esophagectomy for esophageal cancer (n = 9), or gastrectomy for gastric cancer (n = 2), were endoscopically treated in our department. The extent of the dehiscences ranged from about 20% to 70% of the anastomotic circumference. After endoscopic lavage and debridement of the leakage at 2-day intervals (mean duration, 8.6 days), a large-diameter polyester stent (Polyflex; proximal/distal diameters 25/21 mm) was placed to seal the leakage. Simultaneously, the periesophageal mediastinum was drained by chest drains. OBSERVATIONS: All 12 patients were successfully treated endoscopically without the need for reoperation. A complete closure of the leakage was obtained in 11 of 12 patients after stent removal (median time to stent retrieval, 4 weeks, range 2-8 weeks). In one patient, a persistent leak was sealed endoscopically after stent removal by using 3 clips. Distal stent migration was obtained in two patients. CONCLUSIONS: The placement of silicone-covered self-expanding polyester stents seems to be a successful minimally invasive treatment option for clinically apparent intrathoracic esophageal anastomotic leaks.     

Post-operative esophageal leak treated with removable silicone-covered polyester stent

Self-expanding removable covered stents are increasingly being used for the treatment of benign esophageal diseases such as leaks or perforations and stenosis. They are easy to place and remove and good outcomes have been reported. We report a case of a postoperative esophageal leak successfully managed with a removable silicone-covered polyester stent.     

Biliary drainage tube evaluation after common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We studied the postoperative evaluation of transcystic duct tube drainage (C-tube), T-tube drainage (T-tube), and retrograde transhepatic biliary drainage after common bile duct exploration for patients with choledocholithiasis. METHODOLOGY: We analyzed the preoperative clinical features of patients, intraoperative findings, postoperative status and management, daily output of bile, liver function, postoperative infections, and postoperative complications for patients who underwent common bile duct exploration including 16 C-tube, 17 T-tube, and 8 retrograde transhepatic biliary drainage cases. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the preoperative clinical features, intraoperative findings, or the daily output of bile from the tube. The removal day of the biliary drainage tube and postoperative hospital stay were shorter in the C-tube group than in the T-tube and retrograde transhepatic biliary drainage groups. Aspartate amino-transferase level and body temperature in the C-tube group on day 7 were lower than those in the T-tube group, and the total bilirubin level in the C-tube group on day 14 was lower than in the T-tube and retrograde transhepatic biliary drainage groups. Moreover, postoperative complications occurred significantly less frequently in the C-tube group (25.0%) than in the T-tube group (76.5%). CONCLUSIONS: C-tube drainage is thought to be most useful after common bile duct exploration for patients with choledocholithiasis.     

Prevention of bile leak after major hepatectomy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Bile leak remains a serious complication after major hepatectomy. The usefulness of external biliary drainage to prevent intraperitoneal bile leak was studied. METHODOLOGY: Thirty-nine patients who underwent major hepatectomy from April 1997 through June 2000 were studied. The bile leak test was performed to identify and close leaks following the resection. Patients who still had leakage underwent retrograde transhepatic biliary drainage (RTBD) via a tube inserted through a choledochostomy. Patient's backgrounds, incidence of bile leak, and time until resolution of bile leak were compared between patients who did and did not have an RTBD tube placed. RESULTS: Nineteen patients had an RTBD tube (48.7%). Bile leak developed in 4 patients with the tube (21.1%), and in 4 patients without the tube (20.0%) (not significant). However, the time until resolution of bile leak was 13.3 days for patients with the tube and 51.3 days for patients without the tube (p<0.05). Two patients developed local peritonitis when the tube was removed. CONCLUSIONS: Though some patients had bile leakage even with the RTBD tube, use of the RTBD tube decreased the length of time leakage that occurred. RTBD tube drainage should be done routinely with major hepatectomy.     

Nasobiliary tube management of postcholecystectomy bile leaks

BACKGROUND: Endobiliary stenting is the traditional form of endoprosthetic drainage for biliary leaks. Nasobiliary tubes offer the advantage of easy removal and interval tube cholangiograms to assess leak resolution. AIM: To determine the efficacy of nasobiliary tube drainage in patients with postcholecystectomy biliary leaks and provide our experience with management of biliary leak using nasobiliary drains. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 24 patients who were treated for postcholecystectomy biliary leaks in a tertiary referral center from 1998 to 2002. These patients were managed with either nasobiliary tube (NBT) alone or NBT + endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES). RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (mean age, 57.5 years; 50% women) had postcholecystectomy leak noted on ERCP. Twenty patients were managed by NBT+ES and 4 patients had NBT placement alone. In the NBT+ES group, 2 patients pulled their NBT out, but 18 patients had complete leak resolution in 3 to 9 days. In the NBT group, all patients had complete leak resolution in 4 to 12 days. Using an intention-to-treat analysis, 22 of 24 (92%) patients were successfully treated with NBT treatment over 3 to 12 days. CONCLUSIONS: ERCP with NBT placement is an effective and safe treatment modality in the management of postcholecystectomy biliary leaks.     

Eficacia y seguridad de la terapia de vacío endoscópica para el tratamiento de perforaciones y dehiscencias anastomóticas del tracto digestivo superior

AimTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) in the management of perforations and anastomotic leaks of the upper gastrointestinal tract.Patients and methodsThis is a retrospective observational study which included patients who underwent EVT due to any upper gastrointestinal defect between April 2017 and February 2019 in three Spanish Hospitals. To this end, we used the only medical device approved to date for endoscopic use (Eso-SPONGEr; B. Braun Melsungen AG, Melsungen, Germany).Results11 patients were referred for EVT of an anastomotic leak after esophagectomy (n = 7), gastrectomy (n = 2), esophageal perforation secondary to endoscopic Zenker's septomiotomy (n = 1) and Boerhaave syndrome (n = 1). The median size of the cavity was 8 × 3 cm. The median delay between surgery and EVT was 7 days. The median of EVT duration was 28 days. The median number of sponges used was 7 and the mean period replacement was 3.7 days. In 10 cases (91%), the defect was successfully closed. In 9 cases (82%) clinical resolution of the septic condition was achieved. 5 patients presented some adverse event: 3 anastomotic strictures, 1 retropharyngeal pain and 1 case of new-onset pneumonia. The median hospital stay from the start of EVT was 45 days. 1 patient died owing to septic complications secondary to the anastomotic leak.ConclusionEVT was successful in over 90% of perforations and anastomotic leaks of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Moreover, this is a safe therapy with only mild adverse events associated.     

Endoscopic therapy for bile leak based on a new classification: results in 207 patients

BACKGROUND: Bile leak is among the most common complications of cholecystectomy. Endoscopic therapy is empiric; a systematic approach to management of bile leak has not been established. METHODS: The severity of bile leak was classified by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography into low grade (leak identified only after intrahepatic opacification) or high grade (leak observed before intrahepatic opacification). Therapy was based on this distinction: biliary sphincterotomy alone for low-grade leaks and stent placement for high-grade leaks. The success of this strategy in consecutive patients treated between 1989 and 1999 was reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 207 patients (127 women, 80 men; median age 57 years) with bile leak were referred for endoscopic management; 134 had undergone laparoscopic, and 72 had open cholecystectomy. Patients presented at a median of 9 days (range 1-50 days) after surgery. Symptoms included pain (56%), jaundice (16%), fever (11%), and abdominal distension (7%). Persistent percutaneous drainage was present in 48%. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography identified the leak site in 204 patients: cystic duct stump, 159 patients (78%); duct of Luschka, 26 (13%); other, 19 (9%). Of 104 patients with low-grade leaks, 75 had sphincterotomy alone; improvement occurred in 68 patients (91%). Subsequent treatment was required in 7 patients (6 stent, 1 surgery). Stents were placed in the remaining 29/104 patients for the following reasons: biliary stricture (11/29); coagulopathy, precluding sphincterotomy (8/29); severe sepsis (3/29); inadequate drainage after prior sphincterotomy (2/29); and unclear reasons (5/29). Of 100 patients with high-grade leaks, 97 had stent placement. Persistent leakage necessitated another stent insertion in 4 patients. Closure of the leak was documented by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in all 97 patients. Three patients with leaks not amenable to endoscopic treatment were referred for surgery. Bile-duct stones were identified in 41 patients (28, low-grade group; 13, high-grade group) and were extracted in all cases. Overall, complications occurred in 3 patients (2 pancreatitis, 1 perforation) and were managed conservatively with no mortality. CONCLUSIONS: A simple, practical endoscopic classification system for bile leak after cholecystectomy is proposed. This classification has clinical relevance for selection of optimal endoscopic management.     

Successful surgical strategy in a late case of Boerhaave’s syndrome

Boerhaave’s syndrome refers to the spontaneous transmural rupture of the esophagus. Primary repair may be performed in patients who present within 24 h of perforation, and such cases have the best outcomes as most complications have not yet developed. However, the treatment of late perforations remains controversial. Various approaches and strategies to repair late perforations have been described in the literature, but there is no uniform approach. We present a case of Boerhaave’s syndrome in which the patient underwent surgical repair 48 h after the acute event and was subsequently treated successfully. The initial approach included direct esophageal repair, a drainage series, and nutritional support via a feeding jejunostomy. Although the repair site was subsequently disrupted, the patient showed complete healing of the perforation after three weeks. We consider that our surgical treatment strategy is safe and technically feasible, and appears to be a promising alternative approach for the treatment of patients with late Boerhaave’s perforation.     

Comparison of clinical outcomes after conservative and surgical treatment of isolated anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

The clinical course and outcome of isolated anastomotic leaks (IALs) after esophagectomy are significantly different from those of necrotic leaks. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical features, diagnosis, treatment, and long‐term outcome in patients with IALs after esophagectomy with reconstruction for esophageal cancer. A total of 663 patients underwent esophagectomy with esophageal reconstruction because of esophageal cancer between 2000 and 2010 at the Seoul Asan Medical Center. IALs occurred in 23 patients (3.5%). All patients with IAL were male, with a median age of 61 years. Patients with IAL were divided into three groups based on their clinical course. group A comprised patients who had definite clinical symptoms and/or signs indicating mediastinal contamination or leak before routine contrast esophagography was performed. Groups B and C comprised patients who had no definite clinical symptoms and/or signs of leaks before the routine contrast examination. Furthermore, group B contained those patients who resumed oral intake because no leak was found in the routine contrast examination and was diagnosed some days after resuming oral intake. Group C contained those patients who kept fasting because the leak was found in the routine contrast examination. The median follow‐up period was 30 months. The mean time to closure of the IAL was 70.1 ± 96.0 days (range 4–364). There was a 72.7% overall closure rate within 60 days. By univariate analysis, the mean time to closure of the IAL was found to be significantly longer for group A patients or in cases where the patients had an uncontained leak, leukocytosis, or empyema. However, there was no statistically significant differences in age, neoadjuvant treatment, site of anastomosis (cervical vs. thoracic), fever, or treatment of the leak. By multivariate analysis, group A was found to be an independent predictive factor for the time to closure of the IAL. Repeat contrast studies revealed no anastomotic leaks in 18 patients and the formation of contained fistula in four cases (excluding one patient who died in hospital). The four patients with a contained fistula showed no clinical symptoms or signs, and tolerated resumed oral intake. IALs were resolved in most cases with low leak‐related mortality, and resolution of the leaks occurred within 2 months in the majority of patients.     

The management of esophagogastric anastomotic leak after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma

Esophagogastric anastomotic leaks are the most feared surgical complications following resection of esophageal cancers. We aimed to develop a therapeutic algorithm for this complication characterized by high morbidity and mortality using our 20 years of experience and the published literature. A total of 354 patients who had undergone an esophagectomy and esophagogastric anastomosis due to esophageal carcinoma were evaluated retrospectively. The incidence for anastomotic leak was 15.5% ( n  = 90) in the cervical region and 4.2% ( n  = 264) in the thoracic region (mean: 7.1%). Cervical anastomotic leaks were detected after a mean period of 7.2 days following the procedure. Fourteen patients with cervical leaks were treated conservatively. Four out of 14 patients (28.6%) died due to sepsis and multi-organ failure related to fistula. Thoracic anastomotic leaks were detected after a mean period of 4.7 days following the procedure. Emergency reoperation, resection and reconstruction procedures were performed in one patient. Self-expanding metallic coated stents were placed at the anastomosis region in two patients. A more conservative approach was employed in other patients with thoracic anastomotic leaks. Six of them (46.2%) died due to fistula. General mortality rate was 37.0%, and the duration of hospitalization was 40.0 days for patients with anastomotic leaks. Cervical anastomotic leaks are more common than thoracic anastomotic leaks, but most of them are successfully treated with conservative approaches. Thoracic anastomotic leaks that in the past were related to high mortality rates despite conservative or surgical procedures might be successfully treated nowadays with the use of self-expanding metallic coated stents.     

A prospective randomised study of drains in infra-peritoneal rectal anastomoses

Although increasing evidence suggests that prophylactic drainage after intra-peritoneal colorectal anastomoses is unnecessary, drains for infra-peritoneal rectal anastomoses, where the leak rate is higher, are widely employed still. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of prophylactic drainage after anastomosis below the peritoneal reflection. All patients attending one specialist unit over an 8-month period for elective rectal cancer resection with an infra-peritoneal anastomosis were randomised to drainage or no drainage. The incidence of anastomotic leak and complications specific to the drain as well as other complications were compared. Fifty-nine patients were analysed (31 with drain). Twenty-five of the drained and 16 of the no-drain patients had a defunctioning stoma (p=ns). The groups were comparable for demographic data, operation and anastomotic height from the anal verge. There were three leaks (10%) in the drain group and five leaks (18%) in the no-drain group (p=ns). There were 2 (7%) patients in each group with a clinical leak. There were no specific drain complications and the incidence of other complications was similar in both groups. In conclusion, this study supports the contention that there is no difference in morbidity with or without the use of a drain for infra-peritoneal anastomoses. Received: 10 March 2001 / Accepted in revised form: 18 May 2001     

Over-the-scope-clipping system for anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery:Report of two cases

An anastomotic leak is one of the major complications following colorectal surgery.Standard treatments for anastomotic leak are total parenteral nutrition or temporary ileostomy.The over-the-scope-clipping(OTSC)system was originally developed to treat intestinal perforation or to close the tissue after natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.Two cases of successful management of an anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery using the OTSC system are reported.One patient avoided a temporary ileostomy.In the other,hospitalization was shortened by the use of the OTSC system.The OTSC system can be a potential option in the management of anastomotic leaks after colorectal surgery.