Testosterone and Erection: Practical Management for the Patient with Erectile Dysfunction

Although erectile dysfunction (ED) and testosterone deficiency syndrome are two independently distributed disorders, there is a degree of overlap between them. Testosterone replacement therapy, either alone or combined with other treatments such as a phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor, may therefore be useful in some men with ED. Corrective treatment of ED includes sex therapy, risk factor modification, chronic usage of PDE5 inhibitors, and testosterone replacement. Studies have shown that testosterone replacement in men with hypogonadism improves libido and erectile function in a significant proportion of cases. If corrective treatment fails or is not indicated, symptomatic treatments such as oral PDE5 inhibitors or intraurethral/intracavernous therapy are available. PDE5 inhibitors are an excellent first-line choice, although a significant proportion of men still fail to respond to monotherapy. Testosterone deficiency may be overlooked in some men with ED and, because this may be associated with lower expression of PDE5 in the penis, it could result in failure of PDE5 inhibitor therapy. Recent recommendations, therefore, suggest the need for combination therapy in some patients. In conclusion, all men presenting with ED should have their testosterone levels checked, and testosterone replacement should be considered in those with low levels. Testosterone replacement should also be considered in hypogonadal men with ED not responding to PDE5 inhibitors. If erections remain insufficient after 3 mo, a combination of testosterone and a PDE5 inhibitor may be beneficial.     

Centrally acting mechanisms for the treatment of male sexual dysfunction

The development of pharmacologic therapy for erectile dysfunction (ED) has been possible because of incremental growth in our understanding of the physiology of normal erections and the complex pathophysiology of ED. Although the oral phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors have provided safe, effective treatment of ED for some men, a large proportion of men who have ED do not respond to PDE5 inhibitors or become less responsive or less satisfied as the duration of therapy increases. Also, men who are receiving organic nitrates and nitrates, such as amyl nitrate, cannot take PDE5 inhibitors because of nitrate interactions. The current options for treatment beyond PDE5 inhibitors are invasive, unappealing to some patients, and sometimes ineffective. The search for other options by which ED can be treated has branched out and now encompasses centrally acting mechanisms that control erectile function. Drugs available in Europe include apomorphine. This article focuses on the mechanism of centrally acting agents and reviews clinical data on potential new centrally acting drugs for men who have ED.     

Recent insights into androgen action on the anatomical and physiological substrate of penile erection

Erectile response is centrally and peripherally regulated by androgens.The original insights into the mechanismsof action of androgens were that androgens particularly exert effects on libido and that erections in response to eroticstimuli were relatively androgen-independent.It was shown that sexual functions in men required androgen levels atthe low end of reference values of testosterone.So it seemed that testosterone was not useful treatment for men witherectile difficulties,particularly following the advent of the phosphodiesterase type 5(PDE5)inhibitors.However,approximately 50% of those treated with PDE5 inhibitors discontinue their treatment.A number of recent develop-ments shed new light on testosterone treatment of erectile dysfunction(ED)in aging men.(1)A recent insight is that,in contrast to younger men,elderly men might require higher levels of testosterone for normal sexual functioning.(2)Several studies have indicated that PDE5 inhibitors are not always sufficient to restore erectile potency in men,andthat testosterone improves the therapeutical response to PDE5 inhibitors considerably.(3)There is growing insightthat testosterone has profound effects on tissues of the penis involved in the mechanism of erection and that testoster-one deficiency impairs the anatomical and physiological substrate of erectile capacity,reversible upon androgenreplacement.The synthesis of PDE5 is upregulated by androgens,and the arterial inflow into the penis is improved bygiving androgen.The above invites a re-examination of the merits of giving testosterone to aging men with ED.Thebeneficial effects of PDE5 inhibitors may only be optimally expressed in a eugonadal environment.(Asian J Androl2006 Jan;8:3-9)     

Duration of erectile dysfunction and its relationship to treatment seeking and satisfaction with treatment using PDE5 inhibitors

Objectives:   This cross-sectional study was designed to evaluate whether the duration of erectile dysfunction (ED) influenced treatment seeking and satisfaction with treatment using PDE5 inhibitors.
Methods:   Participants were 409 men with ED who were primarily recruited over the internet via men's health web sites. Participants completed a questionnaire to assess the duration and perceived severity of ED, information and help-seeking behaviors for ED, and treatment usage and satisfaction with PDE5 inhibitor medication.
Results:   The results demonstrated that men with ED of longer duration were more likely to have discussed their ED with their partner and doctor and to have sought information and treatment for their ED problem. No differences were found in reported satisfaction with ED medication usage or expected future medication use across the varying levels of ED duration, once variance attributable to age was accounted for.
Conclusions:   These results suggest that men are more likely to accept that they have ED and seek treatment for their ED with increasing duration of the condition, although these men are not more satisfied with PDE5 inhibitors as a treatment option.     

Tadalafil and vardenafil vs sildenafil: a review of patient‐preference studies

The immediate objective of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor treatment is to restore the ability of a man to achieve and/or maintain an erection adequate for sexual intercourse. As erectile dysfunction (ED) generally develops in the second half of life, the ultimate objective generally is not procreation, but quality of sexual life. Indeed, ED is known to impair quality of life considerably; two‐thirds of men report that ED has impaired their self‐esteem and nearly a third claim that it has damaged the relationship with their partner. It follows that the therapeutic success of PDE5 inhibition has an important subjective component, which is compounded by the subjective nature and complexity of sexual life in humans. This makes it very difficult for physicians to be certain that they have selected the optimal therapy for a couple, even after a thorough evaluation. The 2007 European Association of Urology Guidelines stress the importance of educating the patient and claim that ‘the patient will choose the final drug after his own experience’. However, PDE5 inhibitors are typically used twice a week, so a patient would have to spend ≈3 months trying the various compounds and dosages to achieve adequate exposure to all three PDE5 inhibitors; this would seem an unrealistic strategy in normal clinical practice. The acknowledgement that the patient has an important role in therapeutic decisions for ED has fuelled interest in the concept of patient preference. It has been established that patient preference depends on three factors, i.e. personal characteristics, e.g. age, duration of ED, frequency and dynamics of sexual relations, and the characteristics of their partners, e.g. age, menopausal status and level of interest in sexual activity and medication profile. Medication features of interest include efficacy in terms of quality of erection, consistency of effects, rapid onset of action, long duration of action, side‐effect profile and route of administration; drug costs must also be considered if the medicinal product is not reimbursed.     

Erectile dysfunction and hypertension

Recent analyses suggest that about 67-68% of men with hypertension have some degree of erectile dysfunction (ED). With about 25 million men in the US with hypertension, substantial numbers of hypertension-related ED exist that tend to be of a more severe nature than the general population. Men with ED are also more likely to have hypertension. Thiazide diuretic and beta-blocker therapy may contribute to ED. Phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitors are effective therapy in men with ED owing to hypertension who are taking antihypertensive medicines including those on multiple antihypertensive medicines. The addition of PDE5 inhibitors to usual common antihypertensive medicines (diuretics, beta blockers, calcium blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers) results in either no or small additive reductions in blood pressure (BP) and no increase in serious clinical adverse events. There are however precautions regarding the use of PDE5 inhibitors in patients taking alpha blockers for either hypertension or benign prostatic hypertrophy, as some patients may develop orthostatic hypotension. Organic nitrates remain an absolute contraindication for PDE5 inhibitors because synergistic and symptomatic reductions in BP may occur in some patients with this drug combination.     

Erectile dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease

Recent studies suggest that erectile dysfunction (ED) may be an early marker of endothelial dysfunction and coronary artery disease (CAD). Conversely, patients with CAD commonly have ED. The phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitors are very effective for the treatment of ED in patients with CAD. Numerous studies show that this class of drugs is in general safe in patients with stable CAD and these agents do not exacerbate ischemia in men with CAD undergoing exercise stress testing. Analysis of placebo-controlled trials did not show an increase in cardiovascular events among men receiving PDE5 inhibitors, and post-marketing surveillance studies with sildenafil did not observe an increase in cardiovascular events compared to expected age-matched rates. Organic nitrates remain a contraindication for PDE5 inhibitors and alpha blockers have precautions/contraindications depending upon specific drugs. The Princeton Consensus Guidelines (soon to be updated) suggest a logical approach to the patient with CAD seeking therapy for sexual dysfunction.     

Do vardenafil and tadalafil have advantages over sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction?

Erectile dysfunction (ED) affects up to 50% of men between the ages of 40 and 70 years of age. Sildenafil, vardenafil and tadalafil have all been shown to be similarly effective in the treatment of men with ED of vary etiologies, to have similar adverse effects profiles, and to improve quality-of-life by similar amounts. As these phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitors all increase the hypotensive effects of nitrates, they are not suitable for use in patients taking nitrates for the treatment of ischaemic heart disease. All three inhibitors must be used with caution in patients taking alpha(1)-adrenoceptors antagonists for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Although nonarteritic anterior ischaemic neuropathy has been reported in some users of the PDE5 inhibitors, there is no conclusive evidence that PDE5 inhibitors cause this rare effect. Tadalafil has a longer half-life than sildenafil or vardenafil, and a longer duration of action than sildenafil and vardenafil. Most preference studies have shown tadalafil to be preferred, but there are serious limitations to some of these studies. One approach to treatment is to give each patient a short- and long-acting agent, and for individuals to decide their preference.     

Combining testosterone and PDE5 inhibitors in erectile dysfunction: basic rationale and clinical evidences

INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) and decline of testosterone levels are frequently observed with age and also in illnesses with a common basis of endothelial damage. OBJECTIVES: To review molecular mechanisms underlying androgen action upon its receptor and phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) expression and regulation by testosterone in cavernous tissue and their clinical implication in the treatment of ED refractory to PDE5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is). METHODS: From January 2003 to May 2006 [corrected] we performed an extensive, unsystematic MEDLINE literature search reviewing relevant data on basic and clinical studies regarding the efficacy of combination therapies. RESULTS: Most trials using testosterone alone for treatment of ED in hypogonadal men suffer from methodologic problems and report inconsistent results, but overall the trials suggest that testosterone is superior to placebo. Orally effective PDE5-Is, such as sildenafil, tadalafil, or vardenafil, may be ineffective depending on the demonstration of testosterone regulation of PDE5 expression in human corpus cavernous, and their efficacy may be enhanced by testosterone adjunction whenever necessary. CONCLUSIONS: Screening for hypogonadism in all men with ED is necessary to identify men with severe hypogonadism and some cases of mild to moderate hypogonadism, who may benefit from testosterone treatment. Identification of threshold values for testosterone supplementation to appropriately benefit from PDE5-Is failure may improve clinical management of unresponsive patients with minimization of unwanted effects.     

Significance of hypogonadism in erectile dysfunction

To review the role and significance of hypogonadism, defined as a low testosterone (T) level, in erectile dysfunction (ED). Review of literature. Serum T is below 3 ng/ml in 12% of ED patients, including 4% before and 15% after the age of 50. Replacement studies in men with severe hypogonadism demonstrate that sexual desire and arousal, as well as the frequency of sexual activity and spontaneous erections are clearly T-dependant. Psychic erections are partly T-dependant. The effects of T upon sexual function are dose-dependant up to a threshold level that is consistent within an individual, but markedly variable between individuals, ranging from 2 to 4.5 ng/ml. More evidence is required to confirm a significant impact of T on the intrapenile vascular mechanisms of erections in men as it is the case in animals. No convincing association of T with ED has been found in epidemiological studies. As concerns clinical experience, although a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials established that T therapy consistently restores erectile function in young hypogonadal patients with T below 3.46 ng/ml, the effects of this treatment have been mostly disappointing when used alone in older patients consulting for ED who are subsequently diagnosed to have hypogonadism following routine T measurement. These poor results may probably be explained by the high prevalence of co-morbidities, and by the fact that ED itself may induce hypogonadism. Combination therapy with T and PDE5 inhibitor (PDE5I) may be effective in the hypogonadal ED patients when T therapy alone fails. However, more evidence is required to confirm the hypothesis that a minimum level of T is required for a complete effect of PDE5I in certain men, since a PDE5I was able to restore complete erections in severely hypogonadal men. Though a low T level is not always the only cause of ED in hypogonadal ED patients, there are important benefits in screening for hypogonadism in ED. A low T level justifies a 3 month trial of T therapy, before combining a PDE5I if T therapy alone fails     

Erectile dysfunction, discrepancy between high prevalence and low utilization of treatment options: results from the 'Cottbus Survey' with 10 000 men

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the age-stratified prevalence of erectile dysfunction (ED) and its comorbidities, and to assess the population's knowledge, utilization, and general attitude towards the treatment for ED. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In all, 10 000 men received a 35-item questionnaire including the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and sociodemographic questions regarding life style, comorbidities, quality of sexual life and knowledge or experience of ED therapy. In all, 3124 responses were included (31.2%), 2499 men lived in well established partnerships and were assessed as the basic study group. RESULTS: In the entire population the prevalence rate of ED was 40.1%. However, although known, medical treatment for ED is used only by a minority of affected men. The prevalence of ED was independently associated with age, peripheral arterial occlusive disease, hypertension, ischaemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, and liver diseases. Correlations between sexual quality of life (QoL) and ED were statistically significant (P < 0.01) and moderate to strong (absolute values: Spearman's rho 0.35-0.76). Although 96% of the study population knew at least one phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor by name, only 53% considered taking the medication and only 9% of the men with ED had had experience with available PDE5 inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: The sexual QoL was significantly reduced by ED. Despite high levels of awareness and general acceptance of oral medication for ED, experience with PDE5 inhibitors was low. Further investigation is required to evaluate the general impact of ED on sexual QoL and the need or wish for treatment.     

Efficacy and satisfaction rates of oral PDE5is in the treatment of erectile dysfunction secondary to spinal cord injury: a review of literature

Concept

Decreased sexual function is a major concern of men with spinal cord injuries (SCIs). Treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) through oral pharmacotherapies has been proven to be an effective way to address and treat this concern.

Objective

To find an efficacious and satisfactory treatment ED secondary to SCI through the compilation of studies that utilized the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) when testing phosphodiesterase V inhibitors (PDE5i).

Method

Ten articles, which used the IIEF to study satisfaction and/or efficacy of PDE5is sildenafil, tadalafil, and vardenafil in the treatment of ED were reviewed and analyzed. Through the use of a self-made grading scale the value of each article was determined for this research.

Results

Sildenafil, tadalafil, and vardenafil all have been proven to be effective in treating ED in men with SCI. While sildenafil is the most thoroughly studied ED treatment for patients with SCI, tadalafil has a longer time duration effectiveness, which allows for more spontaneity in the sexual experience. Minimal adverse effects have been noted in patients with SCI using these medications; headache, flushing, and mild hypotension are the most common. In articles that study satisfaction, patients show great improvement over baseline with the use of these medications.

Conclusion

Although there is a need for further research on the safety in long-term use of tadalafil and vardenafil, comparative studies done on all three medications show no statistically significant difference in effectiveness or satisfaction. New medications and treatment options, such as avanafil, are being studied in hope of continued improvement of sexual function in men with SCI.     

The impact of the use of PDE5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction on the lives of Australian men

This article presents findings from a recent cross-sectional study that was designed to evaluate both the impact of erectile dysfunction (ED) on the lives of Australian men, and explore whether the use of PDE5 inhibitors was able to alter this impact. The sample comprised 410 men with ED, and 242 men who did not have ED. All men were primarily recruited over the internet via men's health web sites. Participants completed a questionnaire to assess their self-esteem, masculinity, quality of life, sexual satisfaction, relationship satisfaction and usage of oral ED medication. The results demonstrated that men with ED experienced deficits on all of the psychosocial areas when compared to men without ED. Moreover, treatment with ED medication did not alleviate this deficit. Implications of these findings for the treatment of men with ED are discussed in the context of the biopsychosocial model of health and the need for a multidisciplinary approach to ED management is highlighted.     

Diagnosis of erectile dysfunction

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a problem that may affect up to 52% of men aged between 40 and 70. In the era of type-5 phosphodiesterase (PDE5) inhibitors, the treatment of ED can be simple and effective after the correct diagnosis which is made in the majority of cases with history, examination and some basic laboratory tests.     

Critical analysis of the relationship between sexual dysfunctions and lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia

Context

This review focuses on the relationship among sexual dysfunction (SD), lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and related therapies.

Objective

We reviewed the current literature to provide an overview of current data regarding epidemiology and pathophysiology of SD and LUTS. Moreover, we analysed the impact of currently available therapies of LUTS/BPH on both erectile dysfunction (ED) and ejaculatory dysfunction and the effect of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) in patients with ED and LUTS.

Evidence acquisition

We conducted a Medline search to identify original articles, reviews, editorials, and international scientific congress abstracts by combining the following terms: benign prostatic hyperplasia, lower urinary tract symptoms, sexual dysfunction, erectile dysfunction, and ejaculatory dysfunction.

Evidence synthesis

We conducted a comprehensive analysis of more relevant general population-based and BPH/LUTS or SD clinic-based trials and evaluated the common pathophysiologic mechanisms related to both conditions. In a further step, the overall impact of current BPH/LUTS therapies on sexual life, including phytotherapies, novel drugs, and surgical procedures, was scrutinized. Finally, the usefulness of PDE5-Is in LUTS/BPH was critically analysed, including preclinical and clinical research data as well as possible mechanisms of action that may contribute to the efficacy of PDE5-Is with LUTS/BPH.

Conclusions

Community-based and clinical data demonstrate a strong and consistent association between LUTS and ED, suggesting that elderly men with LUTS should be evaluated for SD and vice versa. Pathophysiologic hypotheses regarding common basics of LUTS and SD as discussed in the literature are (1) alteration of the nitric oxide (NO)-cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) pathway, (2) enhancement of RhoA-Rho-kinase (ROCK) contractile signalling, (3) autonomic adrenergic hyperactivity, and (4) pelvic atherosclerosis. The most important sexual adverse effects of medical therapies are ejaculation disorders after the use of some α-blockers and sexual desire impairment, ED, and ejaculatory disorders after the use of α-reductase inhibitors. Minimally invasive, conventional, and innovative surgical treatments for BPH may induce both retrograde ejaculation and ED. PDE5-Is have demonstrated significant improvements in both LUTS and ED in men with BPH; combination therapy with PDE5-Is and α1-adrenergic blockers seems superior to PDE5-I monotherapy.     

Testosterone undecanoate improves erectile dysfunction in hypogonadal men with the metabolic syndrome refractory to treatment with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors alone

At least 30–35% of men with erectile dysfunction (ED) fail to respond to treatment with phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE‐5) inhibitors. Testosterone (T) has effects not only on sexual desire, but also on the anatomical and physiological substrate of erection. This study analysed the effects of T administration to men unsuccessfully treated for ED with PDE‐5 inhibitors only. Twenty‐nine men aged 36–75 years (mean 59 years) with ED were studied. They suffered from ED for a mean of 2.7 years and had subnormal plasma T levels (total T <3.5 ng ml^?1). They received parenteral testosterone undecanoate for 102 weeks. Changes of the domains of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) were assessed. After 6 weeks of T treatment, the sexual desire domain of IIEF had improved (from 4.1 ± 1.4 to 7.2 ± 1.7) and erectile function as measured by IIEF started to improve, reaching a plateau after 30 weeks (from 9.1 ± 2.1 to 26.5 ± 2.3). Features of the metabolic syndrome also improved. There were no adverse effects of T administration. Addition of T to treatment of hypogonadal men unsuccessfully treated with PDE‐5 inhibitors only, appeared useful and acceptably safe.     

Gene and stem cell therapy for erectile dysfunction

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is defined as the inability to attain and/or maintain penile erection sufficient for satisfactory sexual performance. ED is a highly prevalent health problem with considerable impact on the quality of life of men and their partners. Although the treatment of ED with oral phosphodiesterase type V (PDE5) inhibitors is effective in a wide range of individuals, it is not efficacious in all patients. The failure of PDE5 inhibitors happens mainly in men with diabetes, non-nerve sparing radical prostatectomy, and high disease severity. Therefore, improved therapies based on a better understanding of the fundamental issues in erectile physiology and pathophysiology have recently been proposed. Here, we summarize studies on ED treatment using gene and stem cell therapies. Adenoviral-mediated intracavernosal transfer of therapeutic genes, such as endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and RhoA/Rho kinase and mesenchymal stem cell-based cell and gene therapy strategy for the treatment of age- and diabetes-related ED are the focus of this review.     

PDE5抑制剂治疗缺血再灌注损伤研究进展

5型磷酸二酯酶(PDE5)抑制剂常用于治疗男性阴茎勃起功能障碍。近年来,有实验研究表明PDE5抑制剂可用于治疗器官组织缺血再灌注损伤,本文就PDE5抑制剂治疗缺血再灌注损伤的基础和临床研究成果作一综述,以期为临床医生选择使用PDE5抑制剂提供理论依据。     

Testosterone and erectile dysfunction

Aging is associated with a decline in several important health factors in men, including libido. Serum testosterone concentrations also decrease with age, and many age-related clinical features are closely associated with androgen deficiency, including erectile function (ED). Approximately 70% of ED is of organic origin, with the major risk factors being diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, smoking and chronic medical illnesses. These are also established risk factors for atherosclerosis, which is the predominant predisposing factor of vasculogenic ED. The introduction of phosphodiasterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors for the treatment of ED made a significant impact both in terms of clinical efficacy, and increasing the awareness of the condition. In spite of this, some patients fail to respond to PDE-5 inhibitors alone. Both animal and clinical studies indicate that testosterone therapy improves both erectile function and the response to PDE-5 inhibitors in patients with ED and hypogonadism. Indeed, interventional studies demonstrate that testosterone replacement therapy improves erectile function in hypogonadal men who have previously failed to respond to PDE-5 inhibitors alone. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that the full therapeutic potential of PDE5 inhibitors will only become manifest in a eugonadal state. Recent studies have demonstrated a close relationship between testosterone and ED and suggest that testosterone therapy may be a valuable option for an increasing number of affected men. European guidelines recommend that all men presenting with ED should have their testosterone concentrations measured.