The Effect of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Morbidly Obese Chinese Patients

Background  The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is increasing in Eastern and Western countries. Obesity is recognized as a risk factor of gastroesophageal reflux disease. However, little information is available on the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in morbidly obese Chinese patients. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of GERD in Chinese patients with morbid obesity and age- and sex-matched controls, and we also assessed the effect of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on reflux symptoms and erosive esophagitis. Methods  Between November 2006 and February 2008, 150 morbidly obese Chinese patients underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaires and esophagogastroduodenoscopy results were assessed in all cases before surgery. The prevalence of reflux symptoms and erosive esophagitis was compared with the prevalence in a database of 300 age- and sex-matched controls. We also compared baseline and postoperative characteristics at 12 months after operation. Results  Patients with morbid obesity had higher frequencies of reflux symptoms (16% vs. 8%, P = 0.01) and erosive esophagitis (34% vs. 17%, P < 0.01) than those of controls. Twelve months after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 26 patients received follow-up evaluations. In addition to substantial weight loss, the prevalence of reflux symptoms and erosive esophagitis decreased significantly after operation (19.2% vs. 0%, P = 0.05, and 42.3% vs. 3.8%, P < 0.01, respectively). Conclusions  Gastroesophageal reflux disease is pervasive in Chinese patients with morbid obesity and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass substantially improves not only the reflux symptoms but also the erosive esophagitis.     

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Obesity. Pathophysiology and Implications for Treatment

Although the etiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is multifactorial, the pathophysiology of the disease in morbidly obese patients remains incompletely understood. The aims of this study were to compare in morbidly obese (body mass index (BMI) ≥35) and nonmorbidly patients (BMI <35) with GERD: (a) lower esophageal sphincter (LES) profile; (b) esophageal body function; and (c) esophageal acid exposure. We reviewed esophageal manometry and ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring studies of 599 consecutive patients with GERD (DeMeester score >14.7). Patients were divided into two groups according to the BMI: (1) 520 patients (86.8%) with BMI <35 and (2) 79 patients (13.2%) with BMI ≥35. While the DeMeester score was not different between the two groups, morbidly obese patients had higher LES pressure and higher amplitude of peristalsis in the distal esophagus (DEA). Among these patients, LES and DEA pressures were often hypertensive. A linear regression model showed that BMI, LES pressure, LES abdominal length, and DEA were independently associated with the DeMeester score. These data showed that: (a) BMI was independently associated to the severity of GERD; and (b) in most morbidly obese patients with GERD, reflux occurred despite normal or hypertensive esophageal motility. These findings show that the pathophysiology of GERD in morbidly obese patients might differ from that of nonobese patients, suggesting the need for a different therapeutic approach. Presented at the 47th Annual Meeting of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Los Angeles, CA, May 22–24, 2006.     

Laparoscopic fundoplication compared with laparoscopic gastric bypass in morbidly obese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

BackgroundGastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is commonly associated with morbid obesity. Laparoscopic fundoplication is a standard surgical treatment for GERD, and laparoscopic gastric bypass has been shown to effectively resolve GERD symptoms in the morbidly obese. We sought to compare the in-hospital outcomes of morbidly obese patients who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication for the treatment of GERD versus laparoscopic gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity and related conditions, including GERD, at U.S. academic medical centers.MethodsUsing the “International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision” procedural and diagnoses codes for morbidly obese patients with GERD, we obtained data from the University HealthSystem Consortium database for all patients who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication or laparoscopic gastric bypass from October 2004 to December 2007 (n = 27,264). The outcome measures included the patient demographics, length of stay, in-hospital overall complications, mortality, risk-adjusted mortality ratio (observed to expected mortality), and hospital costs.ResultsCompared with the patients who underwent laparoscopic gastric bypass, those who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication had a lower severity of illness score (P <.05). The overall in-hospital complications were significantly lower in the laparoscopic gastric bypass group (P <.05). The mean length of stay, observed mortality, risk-adjusted mortality, and hospital costs were comparable between the 2 treatment groups.ConclusionLaparoscopic gastric bypass is as safe as laparoscopic fundoplication for the treatment of GERD in the morbidly obese. Hence, morbidly obese patients with GERD should be referred for bariatric surgery evaluation and offered laparoscopic gastric bypass as a surgical option.     

Gastro-esophageal Reflux and Esophageal Motility Disorders in Morbidly Obese Patients

Background: Morbid obesity has long been considered as a contributing factor to gastro-esophageal reflux, but the literature contains conflicting data on the subject. The authors studied a large number of morbidly obese candidates for bariatric surgery with objective means, in order to better define the incidence of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and esophageal motility disorders in this population. Methods: Morbidly obese patients, in whom indication for bariatric surgery was confirmed after complete evaluation, were included consecutively during a 4-year period. The evaluation included history of reflux symptoms, upper GI endoscopy, 24-hour pH monitoring, and stationary esophageal manometry. Results: 345 patients were studied, of whom 35.8% reported reflux symptoms. Endoscopy showed a hiatus hernia in 181 patients (52.6%), and reflux esophagitis in 108 (31.4%). 24-hour pH monitoring revealed an elevated De Meester score in 163 patients (51.7%). Manometry was normal in 247 patients (74.4%), and showed a decreased lower esophageal sphincter pressure in 59 (17.7%). Esophagitis and abnormal pH testing were more common in patients with symptoms or hiatus hernia, and the incidence of esophagitis was higher with abnormal pH testing. Esophagitis was associated with increased weight and abdominal obesity. Conclusions: This study confirms the increased prevalence of GERD in the morbidly obese population. Upper GI endoscopy should be performed routinely during evaluation of morbidly obese patients for bariatric surgery. When both conditions coexist, effective treatment is probably best provided by Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, which produces effective weight loss and correction of pathological reflux.     

Gastroesophageal Reflux in Obesity: The Effect of Lap-Band Placement

Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition which is often aggravated by morbid obesity. Lap-Band surgery provides effective weight loss in the morbidly obese. There have been several reports that gastric banding causes or aggravates reflux. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of Lap-Band placement on GERD. Methods: All patients with a significant history of GERD who had a Lap-Band inserted over a 2-year period were evaluated postoperatively to assess any change in impact on reflux. Resolution required absence of reflux symptoms and no anti-reflux drug therapy. Results: There were 48 (16%) of 274 consecutive patients with a significant history of reflux esophagitis requiring regular therapy preoperatively. The median age was 39 (range 23-58) and M:F ratio was 5:43. We confirm a high prevalence of GERD in patients with morbid obesity: 17% with symptoms requiring regular therapy (Community Norm 7%). Total resolution of all reflux symptoms occurred in 36 (76%) patients, improvement in 7 (14%), no change in 3 (6%), and aggravation of symptoms in 2 (4%). Patients with severe and moderate symptoms had similar improvement. Resolution or improvement was reported soon after surgery. Conclusion: Rapid and major improvement in symptoms of GERD occurs after Lap-Band placement. The placement of the band probably acts directly to reduce reflux. This result contrasts with reports which have found gastric banding causes or aggravates GERD.     

Effort, safety, and findings of routine preoperative endoscopic evaluation of morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery

Background  

Obesity is becoming an epidemic health problem and is associated with concomitant diseases, such as sleep apnea syndrome and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). There is no standardized diagnostic workup for the upper gastrointestinal tract in obese patients; many patients have no upper gastrointestinal symptoms, and few data are available on safety of endoscopy in morbidly obese patients.     

Initial Experience with the Surgical Management of Morbid Obesity Associated with Symptomatic Gastro-esophageal Reflux: A Comparison between Gastroplasty Alone and Gastroplasty with Anterior Fundoplication

The optimal management of patients with morbid obesity and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains an unresolved issue. We have performed a vertical banded gastroplasty combined with an anterior fundoplication (VBG + AF) in 28 selected morbidly obese patients with moderate or severe heartburn. The patients who underwent VBG + AF are compared to patients who had similar heartburn symptoms and underwent gastroplasty alone during this period. In the VBG + AF group there were two treatment failures (7%). In the gastroplasty group there were 63 patients with 15 treatment failures (24%). These differences were independent of demographic and weight loss variables. These results suggest that VBG + AF may provide a superior option for the management of morbidly obese patients with GERD.     

Gastro-Esophageal Reflux and Esophageal Motility Disorders in Morbidly Obese Patients before and after Bariatric Surgery

Background Obesity is a predisposing factor to gastro- esophageal reflux disease (GERD), but esophageal function remains poorly studied in morbidly obese patients and could be modified by bariatric surgery. Methods Every morbidly obese patient (BMI ≥40 kg/m² or ≥35 in association with co-morbidity) was prospectively included with an evaluation of GERD symptoms, endoscopy, 24-hour pH monitoring and esophageal manometry before and after adjustable gastric banding (AGB) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP). Results Before surgery, 100 patients were included (84 F, age 38.4 ± 10.9 years, BMI 45.1 ± 6.02 kg/m2), of whom 73% reported GERD symptoms. Endoscopy evidenced hiatus hernia in 39.4% and esophagitis in 6.4%. The DeMeester score was pathological in 53.3%; 69% of patients had lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure <15 mmHg and 7 had esophageal dyskinesia. BMI was significantly related to the DeMeester score (P = 0.018) but not to LES tone or esophageal dyskinesia. Postoperative data were available in 27 patients (AGB n = 12/60, RYGBP n = 15/36). The DeMeester score (normal <14.72) was significantly decreased after RYGBP (24.8 ± 13.7 before vs 5.8 ± 4.9 after; P < 0.001) but tended to increase after AGB (11.5 ± 5.1 before vs 51.7 ± 70.7 after; P = 0.09), with severe dyskinesia in 2 cases. Conclusion: GERD and LES incompetence are highly prevalent in morbidly obese patients. Preliminary postoperative data show different effects of RYGBP and AGB on esophageal function, with worsening of pH-metric data with occasional severe dyskinesia after AGB.     

Outcome of Esophageal Function and 24-hour Esophageal pH Monitoring after Vertical Banded Gastroplasty and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Background: One of the co-morbidities frequently associated with morbid obesity is gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), present in >50 % of morbidly obese individuals. We compared the anti-reflux effect of vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP), and their effect on esophageal function. Methods: 10 patients underwent VBG and 40 patients underwent RYGBP. Anthropometric parameters, symptomatology of GERD, esophageal manometry (EM), isotopic esophageal emptying (IEE) and 24hr esophageal pH monitoring were recorded in all patients preoperatively, and at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively. Results: Preoperatively, there was a high prevalence of GERD, symptomatic and pH-metric in both groups (57% and 80% respectively). The preoperative values of EM and IEE parameters were within the normal range in most patients. After surgery, there was an improvement at 3 months postoperatively in both groups. 1 year after surgery, the VBG group presented symptomatic GERD in 30% and pH-metric reflux in 60% of patients while the RYGBP group presented symptomatic GERD and pH-metric reflux in 12.5% and 15% of patients, respectively. There was an increase in postoperative sensation of dysphagia in both groups (70% VBG, 30% RYGBP) one year after operation. After surgery, differences in all EM parameters were minimal, and never reached statistical significance for any group (VBG and RYGBP). The IEE showed a significantly higher percentage of esophageal retention after surgery, but this retention was always within the normal range. Both groups had an improvement in anthropometric parameters, but 1 year after surgery the results were significantly better in RYGBP patients (70% excess weight loss) than in VBG patients (46% excess weight loss). Conclusion: >50% of morbidly obese individuals suffer from GERD. We did not find changes in esophageal function of morbidly obese patients to explain their gastroesophageal reflux preoperatively and postoperatively. EM and IEE studies are not indicated as standard preoperative tests, except in patients with significant symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux. RYGBP is significantly better than VBG as an anti-reflux procedure, and had better weight loss.     

Preoperative esophageal manometry and outcome of laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding

Background Laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding (LASGB) for morbid obesity has been reported to provide long-term weight loss with a low risk of operative complications. Nevertheless, esophageal dilation leading to achalasia-like and reflux symptoms is a feared complication of LASGB. This study evaluates the clinical benefit of routine preoperative esophageal manometry in predicting outcome after LASGB in morbidly obese patients. Method A review of prospectively collected data on 77 patients who underwent routine esophageal manometry prior to LASGB for morbid obesity from February 2001 to September 2003 was performed. Aberrant motility, abnormal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressures, and other nonspecific esophageal motility disorders noted on preoperative esophageal manometry defined patients of the abnormal manometry group. Outcome differences in weight loss, emesis, band complications, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) resolution or improvement were compared between patients of the abnormal and normal manometry groups after LASGB. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-square tests were performed to determine the significance of these outcomes. Results Of the patients tested, 14 had abnormal esophageal manometry results, whereas 63 had normal manometry results before LASGB. There was no significant difference in percent excess weight loss (%EWL) at 6 and 12 months between the groups after gastric banding. Severe postoperative emesis occurred more frequently in patients with abnormal manometry results than in those with normal manometry results. There were two band-related complications, both of which occurred in patients of the normal manometry group. Conclusions Preoperative esophageal manometry does not predict weight loss or GERD outcomes after LASGB in morbidly obese patients. Postoperative emesis was more common in patients with abnormal manometry findings, but such symptoms were manageable and did not lead to poor weight loss or to band removal or increased band-related complications. Presented at the 2004 Resident and Fellow Scientific Session of the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), Denver, CO, March 31–April 3, 2004 Received a Poster of Distinction Award at the 2004 Scientific Session of the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), Denver, CO, March 31–April 3, 2004     

Esophageal motility disorders in the morbidly obese population

Background Most studies investigating esophageal motility among the morbidly obese have focused on the relationship between lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Very few studies in the literature have examined motility disorders among the morbidly obese population in general outside the context of GERD. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of esophageal motility disorders in obese patients selected for bariatric surgery. Methods A total of 116 obese patients (81 women and 35 men) selected for laparoscopic gastric banding underwent manometric evaluation of their esophagus from January to March 2003. Tracings were retrospectively reviewed for the end points of LES resting pressure, LES relaxation, and esophageal peristalsis. Results The study patients had a body mass index (BMI) of 42.9 kg/m², and a mean age of 48.6 years. The following abnormal manometric findings were demonstrated in 41% of the patients: nonspecific esophageal motility disorders (23%), nutcracker esophagus (peristaltic amplitude >180 mmHg) (11%), isolated hypertensive LES pressure (>35 mmHg) (3%), isolated hypotensive LES pressure (<12 mmHg) (3%), diffuse esophageal spasm (1%), and achalasia (1%). Only one patient with abnormal esophageal motility reported noncardiac chest pain. Conclusions Despite a high prevalence of esophageal dysmotility in our morbidly obese study population, there was a conspicuous absence of symptoms. Although the patients in this study were not directly questioned with regard to esophageal symptoms, several studies in the literature support our conclusion. Podium presentation at the annual meeting of the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), 26–29 April 2006, Dallas, TX, USA     

Gastroesophageal reflux after sleeve gastrectomy in morbidly obese patients

Background

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is highly prevalent in morbidly obese patients and a high body mass index is a risk factor for the development of this co-morbidity. The effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) on GERD is poorly known.

Methods

We studied the effect of LSG on GERD in patients with morbid obesity. A retrospective review of 28 consecutive patients undergoing LSG for morbid obesity from September 2008 to September 2010 was performed.

Results

A total of 28 patients, 18 women and 10 men, were identified, with a mean age of 42 years (range 18–60). The mean weight and body mass index was 166 kg and 55.5 kg/m², respectively. The mean percentage of excess weight loss was 40% (range 17–83), with a mean follow-up time of 32 weeks (range 8–92). All patients had a pre- and postoperative upper gastrointestinal radiographic swallow study as a part of their routine care. Of these patients, 18% were noted to have new-onset GERD on their postoperative upper gastrointestinal swallow test after their LSG procedure. Using the GERD score questionnaire, all patients were interviewed to evaluate their reflux symptoms. We had a 64% response rate, with 22% of patients indicating new-onset GERD symptoms despite receiving daily antireflux therapy. All respondents were extremely happy with their surgery and weight loss to date.

Conclusion

LSG might increase the prevalence of GERD despite satisfactory weight loss. Additional studies evaluating esophageal manometry and ambulatory 24-hours pH-metry are needed to better evaluate the effect of LSG on gastroesophageal reflux symptoms.     

Outcome of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in patients with body mass index ≥35

Background To date, few studies have examined the effect of morbid obesity on the outcome of laparoscopic antireflux surgery and results have been conflicting. The aim of this work was to study the outcome of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) in patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35. Methods We prospectively followed 70 patients (15 men, 55 women) with a proven diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and a mean BMI of 38.4 ± 0.5 (range, 35–51) who underwent LNF. All patients underwent 24-h pH study, esophageal manometry, upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, and GERD symptom score before and 6 months after LNF. Surgical outcomes were compared to those of 70 sequential nonobese patients (BMI < 30) who also underwent LNF. Results LNF was completed laparoscopically in 69 of 70 patients in the morbidly obese (MO) group and in all 70 patients in the normal-weight (NW) group. The mean operative time for the MO group was not significantly longer than that for the NW group (55.9 ± 2.3 min vs 50.0 ± 2.1 min), but the mean length of stay was significantly longer (3.17 ± 0.2 days vs 2.2 ± 0.1 days, p < 0.0001) in the MO group. There was one postoperative complication (a transhiatal herniation of the stomach) in the morbidly obese group. In both patient groups, LNF resulted in a significant increase in lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressures. This was associated with a significant decrease in percent acid reflux in 24-h testing and a significant improvement in GERD symptom score in both groups, although patients in the MO group had a significantly higher mean reflux symptom score after surgery than did those in the NW group. After a mean follow-up of 41.6 ± 2.9 months, one patient in the MO group required reoperation and one proton pump inhibitor therapy (PRN PPI), as required. Conclusions Morbid obesity does not adversely affect the outcome of LNF. The conversion rate is low when performed by an experienced surgeon. Presented at the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) meeting, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 12–15 March 2003     

Laparoscopic revision of Nissen fundoplication to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in morbidly obese patients

Background  We present a case of a morbidly obese patient with previous laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) who was successfully treated by revision to a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and discuss our collective experience. Methods  Between June 2000 and April 2006 seven morbidly obese patients with mean body mass index (BMI) of 39.4 kg/m² underwent laparoscopic revision of LNF to RYGB by our group. Important steps of the revision include lysis of all adhesions between the liver and the stomach, dissection of the diaphragmatic crura and gastroesophageal fat pad, reduction and repair of hiatal hernia and complete take-down of the wrap to avoid stapling over the fundoplication which can create an obstructed, septated pouch. Results  There was one (14.3%) conversion. Mean operative time (OT) was 324 (206–419) minutes and length of stay was 4.9 (3–8) days. Early complications occurred in 3/7 (42.9%) patients including a staple line hemorrhage without a need for re-exploration, a small pulmonary embolism without hemodynamic instability and a small-bowel obstruction due to a pre-existing incisional ventral hernia that was not repaired on original operation. There were no anastomotic leaks or deaths. At a mean follow-up of 32.9 (12–39) months, mean percentage excess weight loss was 79.5% and 18/28 (64.3%) comorbid conditions were improved or resolved. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) evaluation with the GERD health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) scale showed a significant reduction of GERD scores postoperatively (16.7 versus 4.4). Conclusions  Although laparoscopic RYGB after antireflux surgery is technically difficult and carries higher morbidity, it is feasible and effective in the treatment of recurrent GERD in morbidly obese patients. Electronic supplementary material  The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Manometric Abnormalities and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in the Morbidly Obese

Background: Obesity is an epidemic in the USA. Many disorders are associated with obesity including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, the prevalence of GERD and esophageal motility disorders in the morbidly obese population is unclear. Methods: During evaluation for bariatric surgery, 61 morbidly obese patients underwent preoperative 24-hr pH and esophageal manometry. A single reviewer evaluated all 24-hr pH and manometric tracings. Johnson-DeMeester score >14.7 was considered diagnostic of GERD. Manometric criteria for motility disorders were from published values. All values are given as mean ± SD. Results: Mean age was 44.4 + 10.3 years. 55 of the patients (90%) were female. Mean BMI was 50.1 ± 7.2 kg/m². 23 patients (38%) complained of GERD symptoms (reflux and/or heartburn). 1 patient (2%) complained of noncardiac chest pain. Mean Johnson-DeMeester score was 19.6 ± 17.8. Mean intragastric and intrabolus pressures were both elevated (8.3 ± 1.6 mmHg and 15 ± 9 mmHg). 33 patients (54%) had abnormal manometric findings: 10 had a mechanically defective LES, 11 had a hypertensive LES, 2 had diffuse esophageal spasm, 3 had nutcracker esopha gus,1 had ineffective esophageal disorder and 14 had nonspecific esophageal motility disorder. Some patients had more than one disorder. 20 patients (33%) had significantly elevated (>180 mmHg) contraction amplitudes at the most distal channel (210.0 ± 28.7 mmHg). Conclusions: Prevalence of manometric abnormalities in the morbidly obese is high. Presence of a nut cracker-like distal esophagus in the morbidly obese is significant and warrants further evaluation.     

Comparison of early outcomes for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair between nonobese and morbidly obese patient populations

Background  Obesity predisposes to incisional herniation and increased the incidence of recurrence after conventional open repair. Only sparse data on the safety and security of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) for morbidly obese patients are available. This study compared the incidence of perioperative complications and early recurrence after LVHR between morbidly obese and non–morbidly obese patients. Methods  The case records of consecutive patients who underwent LVHR between December 2002 and August 2007 were reviewed. Patients with a body mass index (BMI) lower than 35 kg/m² were compared with morbidly obesity patients who had a BMI of 35 kg/m² or higher. Results  The study included 168 patients (87 men) with a median age of 55 years (range, 24–92 years). Two conversions to open repair (1.2%) were performed, both for non–morbidly obese patients. Of the 168 patients, 42 (25%) were morbidly obese (BMI range, 35.0–58.0 kg/m²) and 126 (75%) were non–morbidly obese (BMI range, 15.5–34.9 kg/m²). The groups showed no significant differences in age, gender, number or size of fascial defects, operative time, length of hospital stay, or incidence of perioperative complications. At a median follow-up period of 19 months (range, 6–62 months), 20 patients (12%) had recurrent hernias. The incidence of recurrence was significantly associated with the size of the fascial defect and the size of the mesh, but not with morbid obesity. Conclusion  No significant difference in the incidence of perioperative complications or recurrence after LVHR was observed between the morbidly obese patients and the non–morbidly obese patients.     

Clinical Utility of Endoscopy and Barium Swallow X-Ray in the Diagnosis of Sliding Hiatal Hernia in Morbidly Obese Patients: A Study Before and After Gastric Bypass

Background  

The main clinical consequence of sliding hiatal hernia (SHH) is gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Endoscopy and barium swallow X-ray are commonly used to diagnose SHH. We aimed to assess the clinical utility of endoscopy and X-ray in the diagnosis of SHH in morbidly obese patients before and after gastric bypass (GBP).     

Sleeve gastrectomy and crural repair in obese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and/or hiatal hernia

BackgroundGastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with or without hiatal hernia (HH) is now recognized as an obesity-related co-morbidity. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass has been proved to be the most effective bariatric procedure for the treatment of morbidly obese patients with GERD and/or HH. In contrast, the indication for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in these patients is still debated. Our objective was to report our experience with 97 patients who underwent SG and HH repair (HHR). The setting was a university hospital in Italy.MethodsFrom July 2009 to December 2011, 378 patients underwent a preoperative workup for SG. In 97 patients, SG was performed with HHR. The clinical outcome was evaluated considering GERD symptom resolution or improvement, interruption of antireflux medications, and radiographic evidence of HH recurrence.ResultsBefore surgery, symptomatic GERD was present in 60 patients (15.8%), and HH was diagnosed in 42 patients (11.1%). In 55 patients (14.5%), HH was diagnosed intraoperatively. The mean follow-up was 18 months. GERD remission occurred in 44 patients (73.3%). In the remaining 16 patients, antireflux medications were diminished, with complete control of symptoms in 5 patients. No HH recurrences developed. “De novo” GERD symptoms developed in 22.9% of the patients undergoing SG alone compared with 0% of patients undergoing SG plus HHR.ConclusionSG with HHR is feasible and safe, providing good management of GERD in obese patients with reflux symptoms. Small hiatal defects could be underdiagnosed at preoperative endoscopy and/or upper gastrointestinal contrast study. Thus, a careful examination of the crura is always recommended intraoperatively.     

Abnormal esophageal acid exposure is common in morbidly obese patients and improves after a successful Lap-band system implantation

Background: The relation between gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and obesity is controversial. The laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) procedure is effective for morbid obesity. Its indication in the presence of GERD, however, is still debated. This study aimed to investigate esophageal symptoms, motility patterns, and acid exposure in morbidly obese patients before and after LAGB placement. Method: For this study, 43 consecutive obese patients were investigated by a standardized symptoms questionnaire, stationary manometry and 24-h ambulatory pH-metry, and 16 patients with abnormal esophageal acid exposure were reevaluated 18 months after LAGB placement. Results: Symptom scores and abnormal esophageal acid exposure were found to be significantly higher, Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LOS) pressure was significantly lower in obese patients than in control subjects. After LAGB, esophageal acid exposure was significantly reduced in all but two patients, who presented with proximal of gastric pouch dilation. Conclusions: There is a high prevalence of GERD in the obese population. Uncomplicated LAGB placement reduces the amount of acid in these patients with abnormal esophageal acid exposure.