Colonic low‐grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and orthotopic endometrial stromal tumor with limited infiltration sharing the JAZF1‐SUZ12 gene fusion

Endometrial stromal tumors (ESTs) are composed of cells resembling endometrial stroma, and are divided into benign and malignant types based on morphology. Endometrial stromal nodule (ESN) is a benign localized tumor, and endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is an infiltrative and potentially metastatic neoplasm. A series of genetic aberrations contribute to pathological diagnosis of ESTs. At present, subsets of ESN and ESS‐low grade (ESS‐LG) are characterized as JAZF1‐SUZ12/JJAZ1 gene fusion. The ESTs that show higher grade atypia but lack nuclear pleomorphism include YWHAE‐FAM22 ESS. Here we report an unusual case of ESTs. Sudden colonic perforation occurred to the patient, and emergency surgery was performed. Pathological findings suggested metastatic ESS. Thorough medical examination of the genital organs detected a 1 cm‐sized well‐demarcated uterine tumor. Microscopically, the tumor lacked infiltrative features, conforming to the definition of ESN. Both lesions demonstrated identical cytology and shared JAZF1‐SUZ12 gene fusion. Endometriosis was not found in any areas of the resected organs, strongly suggesting that the uterine orthotopic tumor metastasized. The current case uncovered the problems of differential diagnosis between ESN and ESS‐LG. We demonstrate detailed pathological features of the two lesions, and discuss the possibility of orthotopic EST with limited infiltration to develop into ESS‐LG.     

Prognostic indicators in WHO 2003 low‐grade endometrial stromal sarcoma

Aims: Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) has traditionally been divided into low and high grade, but the World Health Organization (WHO, 2003) has changed the definition. Since 2003, many studies have used the old criteria, and few have focused on WHO 2003‐defined ESS low grade (ESS‐LG). The aim of this study was to investigate prognosticators in ESS‐LG. Methods and results: We reviewed the WHO 2003 diagnostic criteria in 91 tumours (previously classified as ESS low and high grade). There were 68 cases of ESS‐LG and 23 of undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma (UES). In the ESS‐LG cases, the prognostic value of clinicopathological variables was studied. With a median follow‐up of 79 months (range: 20–474 months), the recurrence and death rates were 5/68 (7%) and 1/68 (1.5%) in the ESS‐LG cases. Ovarian preservation or no ovarian preservation (P < 0.0001, hazard ratio (HR) 10.4) and mitotic activity index (MAI) (0–3 versus >3, P = 0.005, HR 8.6) had independent prognostic value. Other frequently used MAI thresholds – age, tumour diameter, and vessel invasion – were not prognostic. Among patients without ovarian preservation (n = 61), none of 53 with MAI 0–3 suffered recurrence, contrasting with two of eight (25%) of those with MAI >3 (P = 0.003); one of these two recurrence patients died (P = 0.02). Among patients with ovarian preservation (n = 7), three (43%) suffered recurrence but none died, and MAI had no additional prognostic value. Conclusions: In ESS‐LG, ovarian preservation and MAI >3 are associated with increased risk of recurrence.     

Round cell sarcomas beyond Ewing: emerging entities

Primitive small blue round cell tumours (SBRCT) of childhood and young adults have been problematic to diagnose and classify. Diagnosis is also complicated in cases with atypical morphology, aberrant immunoprofiles and unusual clinical presentations. Even with the increased use of ancillary techniques in archival material, such as immunohistochemistry and molecular/genetic methods, a proportion of these tumours cannot be subclassified into specific histological types. A subset of tumours resembling microscopically the Ewing sarcoma family of tumours (EFT), being composed of primitive small round cells and occurring in paediatric or young adult age groups, remain unclassified, being negative for EWSR1, SS18(SYT), DDIT3(CHOP) and FOXO1(FKHR) gene rearrangements by FISH/RT–PCR. A small number of cases sharing the undifferentiated EFT appearance have been characterized recently carrying BCOR–CCNB3 or CIC–DUX4 fusions. However, based on the somewhat limited number of cases, it remains unclear if these newly defined genetic entities belong to any of the pre‐existing clinicopathological disorders or represent altogether novel conditions. This review presents the latest molecular findings related to these SBRCTs, beyond the common EWSR1–ETS fusions. Specific attention has been paid to morphological features not associated typically with classic EFT, and the value of ancillary tests that can be applied when dealing with EWSR1‐negative SBRCTs is discussed.     

The diversity of soft tissue tumours with EWSR1 gene rearrangements: a review

Many soft tissue sarcomas have chromosomal translocations with resultant formation of new fusion genes. Among the genes that can be rearranged, the EWSR1 gene has been identified as a partner in a wide variety of clinically and pathologically diverse sarcomas as well as some non‐mesenchymal tumours. The former include Ewing sarcoma and similar (Ewing‐like) small round cell sarcomas, desmoplastic small round cell tumour, myxoid liposarcoma, extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma, angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma, clear cell sarcoma of soft tissue and clear cell sarcoma‐like tumours of the gastrointestinal tract, primary pulmonary myxoid sarcoma, extrasalivary myoepithelial tumours and sporadic examples of low‐grade fibromyxoid sarcoma, sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma and mesothelioma. EWSR1 is a ‘promiscuous’ gene that can fuse with many different partner genes, but sometimes this results in phenotypically identical tumours. EWSR1 can, conversely, partner with the same genes in morphologically and behaviourally different neoplasms. This paper reviews the diversity of the several soft tissue tumour types that are associated with rearrangement of the EWSR1 gene.     

New developments in endometrial stromal sarcoma

Endometrial stromal tumours have been recently reclassified in the WHO 2014 Classification due to the discovery of new genetic fusions. This has enabled the subdivision of previously described undifferentiated endometrial sarcomas into the molecularly-defined high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HG ESS) and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (UUS). In this review, we discuss the discoveries behind the 2014 Classification and its rationale, and give practical tips for diagnosis of these neoplasms, as well as discussing the differential diagnoses that one may consider.     

Pleomorphic high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with YWHAE gene amplification may be a novel variant with poor prognosis

Endometrial stromal neoplasms are classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) into endometrial stromal nodule (ESN), low grade (LGESS), high grade (HGESS), and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (UUS). HGESS is subclassified based on molecular findings, YWHAE or BCOR. The HGESS with YWHAE::NUTM2A/B (alias YWHAE::FAM22A/B) fusion usually have relatively monomorphic (as with most fusion-associated malignancies) rounded to epithelioid cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm, vesicular nuclei, nucleoli, and mitotic figures >10/10 HPF. We present a 66-year-old woman with post-menopausal bleeding found to have a heterogeneous solid-cystic uterine mass on CT who underwent total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, and pelvic lymph node dissection. A 15.0×9.0 cm variegated uterine mass with hemorrhage and necrosis was identified. Histologically, the tumor was hypercellular with haphazard fascicles, microcysts, and tongue-like destructive myometrial invasion. Tumor cells exhibited marked pleomorphism and high mitotic activity with atypical mitotic figures. There was extensive cyclin-D1 and subset CD10 immunopositivity. FISH showed YWHAE amplification but without rearrangement. Interestingly, we found only two other reported cases of pleomorphic HGESS with YWHAE gene amplification upon review of 259 cases from cBioPortal database, one of which was reported as carcinosarcoma with heterologous elements. Of note, all three YWHAE amplified cases were diagnosed at high-stage and succumbed to disease within six months. Our case appears to be the third case of YWHAE-amplified pleomorphic HGESS, possibly a new variant of uterine sarcoma with aggressive biologic behavior that needs further evaluation.     

Endometrial stromal sarcoma: clinicopathological and immunophenotype study of 18 cases

Malignant tumors of the uterine corpus are uncommon. They originate from the endometrial stroma, smooth muscle, blood vessels, or from a mixture of them. The objective of this article was to know the frequency and the clinical, morphologic, and immunophenotype characteristics of the endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS). We reviewed the cases of ESS observed from 2002 to 2008 at the Pathology Unit of the General Hospital of Mexico. The following data were analyzed: age, clinical stage, degree of differentiation, and immunophenotype. We found 18 cases, and the average age of patients was 48.6 years; 66% were in clinical stages 1 and 2. Fifteen cases (83.3%) were classified as low-grade sarcomas and 3 (16.6%) as high-grade or undifferentiated sarcomas. We determined immunohistochemical markers in 17 cases; receptors to estrogens were positive in 5 (29.4%) and to progesterone in 9 (52.9%). CD10 was expressed in 10 (58.8%) and p53 in 11 cases (64.7%). Two cases were associated to primary tumors of the ovary (papillary cystadenocarcinoma). In conclusion, ESS was present at 0.6% in our institution; and most were low grade. Expression of markers, such as p53, CD10, and hormonal receptors, was positive.     

Retroperitoneal low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with florid endometrioid glandular differentiation: Cytologic-histologic correlation and differential diagnosis

Low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) is a rare neoplasm that typically arises in the uterine corpus and accounts for less than 1% of uterine sarcomas. Infrequently, extra-uterine LGESS can occur. Histologically, LGESS is characterized by a monotonous population of cells that resemble the proliferative phase of endometrial stroma and in their classic form they exhibit tongue-like growth pattern of infiltration and/or lymphovascular invasion. Infrequently LGESS can demonstrate various morphologic differentiation patterns, including endometrioid-type glands. We report the first fine needle aspiration (FNA) case of a periduodenal mass that was incidentally discovered on Computed Tomography (CT) scan of a 60-year-old female. The cytomorphologic and histologic findings and the immunohistochemical staining were consistent with a LGESS with endometrioid glandular differentiation. We are presenting the correlation between the cytologic, radiologic and pathologic features.     

Uterine mesenchymal tumours: recent advances

Almost all uterine mesenchymal tumours have been historically classified as either smooth muscle or endometrial stromal neoplasms. Recent application of molecular techniques has identified numerous lesions with distinctive genetic abnormalities and clinicopathological characteristics. Newly discovered uterine sarcoma subtypes include high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas with BCOR genetic abnormalities, fibrosarcoma-like uterine sarcomas with NTRK rearrangements and COL1A–PDGFRB fusions, as well as undifferentiated uterine sarcomas with SMARCA4 mutations. Novel PLAG1 and PGR fusions have been identified in subsets of myxoid and epithelioid leiomyosarcomas. Some uterine tumours resembling ovarian sex-cord tumour harbour GREB1 and ESR1 rearrangements. Histological and immunophenotypical features as well as underlying genetic abnormalities defining these lesions are discussed.     

Neues in der WHO-Klassifikation 2014 der Tumoren des Corpus uteri

The 2014 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of uterine tumors revealed simplification of the classification by fusion of several entities and the introduction of novel entities. Among the multitude of alterations, the following are named: a simplified classification for precursor lesions of endometrial carcinoma now distinguishes between hyperplasia without atypia and atypical hyperplasia, the latter also known as endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN). For endometrial carcinoma a differentiation is made between type 1 (endometrioid carcinoma with variants and mucinous carcinoma) and type 2 (serous and clear cell carcinoma). Besides a papillary architecture serous carcinomas may show solid and glandular features and TP53 immunohistochemistry with an “all or null pattern” assists in the diagnosis of serous carcinoma with ambiguous features. Neuroendocrine neoplasms are categorized in a similar way to the gastrointestinal tract into well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (small cell and large cell types). Leiomyosarcomas of the uterus are typically high grade and characterized by marked nuclear atypia and lively mitotic activity. Low grade stromal neoplasms frequently show gene fusions, such as JAZF1/SUZ12. High grade endometrial stromal sarcoma is newly defined by cyclin D1 overexpression and the presence of the fusion gene YWHAE/FAM22 and must be distinguished from undifferentiated uterine sarcoma. Carcinosarcomas (malignant mixed Mullerian tumors MMMT) show biological and molecular similarities to high-grade carcinomas.     

CD10 is a sensitive and diagnostically useful immunohistochemical marker of normal endometrial stroma and of endometrial stromal neoplasms

AIMS: The CD10 antigen is expressed in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and follicle centre cell lymphoma. A recent study investigating the expression of CD10 in a wide range of non-haematopoietic neoplasms found positive staining in a small number of endometrial stromal sarcomas as well as in normal endometrial stroma. The present study aimed to ascertain whether CD10 positivity is indeed found in normal endometrial stroma and endometrial stromal neoplasms. Staining of a range of tumours which can be confused morphologically with endometrial stromal neoplasms was also undertaken to ascertain whether antibodies against CD10 are of value in a diagnostic sense. METHODS AND RESULTS: Neoplasms included in the study were endometrial stromal nodule (n=1), low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) (n=13), high-grade ESS (n=6), mixed endometrial stromal-smooth muscle tumour (n=1), uterine cellular leiomyoma (n=10), uterine leiomyosarcoma (n=5), adult granulosa cell tumour (AGCT) (n=10), undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma (n=6), uterine carcinosarcoma with an endometrial stromal component (n=1) and type II uterine mesenchymal tumour with sex cord-like elements (n=1). Cases of proliferative (n=5), secretory (n=5) and atrophic (n=3) endometrium were also stained. There was positive staining of stroma but not of glands in all cases of non-tumorous endometrium. There was positive staining of the endometrial stromal nodule and of all low-grade ESS. Staining in these varied but was often diffuse and of moderate to strong intensity. There was positive staining of four of six high-grade ESS, but this was usually focal. There was also positive staining of the endometrial stromal component in the mixed endometrial stromal-smooth muscle tumour and in the uterine carcinosarcoma. Most cellular leiomyomas were completely negative although three exhibited weak positivity. There was some positivity, usually focal or weak, of three of five leiomyosarcomas. Most AGCT and undifferentiated carcinomas were completely negative although one case of each exhibited focal staining. There was focal staining of the type II uterine mesenchymal tumour with sex cord-like elements. CONCLUSION: CD10 is a reliable and sensitive immunohistochemical marker of normal endometrial stroma. Positivity, which is often strong and/or diffuse is found in endometrial stromal nodules and low-grade ESS. Positive staining with CD10, when strong and diffuse, may be useful in distinguishing these tumours from histological mimics, especially cellular leiomyoma and AGCT which are generally negative. In this situation, CD10 should be used as part of a panel which might include desmin and alpha-inhibin depending on the differential diagnosis considered. Positive staining with CD10 in a high-grade uterine sarcoma which is negative with muscle markers might indicate endometrial stromal differentiation and identify a group of neoplasms which it is correct to diagnose as high-grade ESS rather than undifferentiated uterine sarcoma.