Living donor liver transplantation for hepatitis C related hepatocellular carcinoma in a haemophilia A patient

We report the first case of unrelated living liver transplantation for hepatitis C related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a Chinese patient with haemophilia A. The development of cirrhosis and HCC was insidious in this patient, who has previously failed interferon treatment despite low viral load and genotype 6a. With factor VIII and novoseven support, there were no operative complications and there was no need for blood transfusion. Postoperative pegulated interferon treatment resulted in viral clearance with no increased cellular rejection. The use of living donors represent a potential life saving therapeutic options for hepatitis C virus related complications in haemophiliac, especially in countries of organ shortage. Careful patient and donor choice, meticulous surgical expertise and proper counselling, however, are prudent requirements.     

Living donor liver transplantation for hepatitis B cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has particular advantages for Turkey where hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is the most common cause of cirrhosis, both because LDLT circumvents the difficulties encountered in the emerging world in providing deceased donor organs, and because it allows preemptive antiviral therapy. The aim of this study was to review one institution's experience with LDLT in patients with chronic HBV infection. METHODS: A total of 109 patients with chronic HBV infection underwent LDLT between September 1999 and June 2005, of whom 40 were coinfected with hepatitis D virus and 23 had hepatocellular carcinoma. Antiviral prophylaxis was attempted in all, beginning prior to transplantation with lamivudine or adefovir, and continuing after transplantation with low dose intramuscular hyperimmune B immunoglobulin (HBIg) plus lamivudine or adefovir. RESULTS: In a median follow up of 20 months (range 1-66 months), there was no donor mortality. One-year recipient survival was 90%, and in total 16 recipients died. None of the deaths was related to HBV. Recurrence of HBV infection was detected by reappearance of serum hepatitis B surface antigen in six patients (5.5%) at 5, 8, 12, 17, 34 and 46 months after transplantation, respectively. There was no influence of donor hepatitis B core antibody status on the likelihood of recurrence of HBV in the allograft. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that LDLT with antiviral treatment and low dose HBIg provides excellent results for donors and recipients.     

Two patients treated with pegylated interferon/ribavirin/telaprevir triple therapy for recurrent hepatitis C after living donor liver transplantation

It is difficult to use protease inhibitors in patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation (LT) due to interaction with immunosuppressive drugs. We report our experience with two patients treated with telaprevir (TVR) combined with pegylated interferon/ribavirin (PEG IFN/RBV) for recurrent HCV genotype 1 infection after LT. The first was a 63‐year‐old man with HCV‐related liver cirrhosis, who failed to respond to IFN‐β plus RBV after LT. Treatment was switched to PEG IFN‐α‐2b plus RBV and TVR was started. The donor had TT genotype of interleukin (IL)‐28 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) (rs8099917). The recipient had TT genotype of IL‐28 SNP (rs8099917). Completion of 12‐week triple therapy was followed by PEG IFN‐α‐2b plus RBV for 36 weeks. Finally, he had sustained viral response. The second was a 70‐year‐old woman with HCV‐related liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. She failed to respond to PEG IFN‐α‐2b plus RBV after LT, and was subsequently switched to PEG IFN‐α‐2b/RBV/TVR. Genotype analysis showed TG genotype of IL‐28 SNP for the donor, and TT genotype of IL‐28 SNP for the recipient. Serum HCV RNA titer decreased below the detection limit at 5 weeks. However, triple therapy was withdrawn at 11 weeks due to general fatigue, which resulted in HCV RNA rebound 4 weeks later. Both patients were treated with cyclosporin, starting with a small dose to avoid interactions with TVR. TVR is a potentially suitable agent for LT recipients who do not respond to PEG IFN‐α‐2b plus RBV after LT.     

Risk factors for hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation

Summary.  Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related end-stage liver disease is the main indication for liver transplantation performed in Europe and the United States. Recurrence of hepatitis C in the graft is universal and may lead to chronic hepatitis in most patients and to cirrhosis in 20–30% of patients within 5–10 years of transplantation. The natural history of HCV recurrence is highly variable but leads to a lower survival rate than other recurrent liver diseases. The immunosuppressed status and several other factors have been linked with the pattern and severity of recurrence. What remains controversial are those factors associated with fibrosis progression and how these could be modified to improve outcome of recurrent hepatitis C. No single factor but a combination of several factors is associated with fibrosis progression on the graft. The major factors associated with accelerated disease recurrence include: high viral load pre- (>10⁶ IU / mL) and / or early post-transplantation (>10⁷ IU / mL at 4 months), donor older than 40–50 years, prolonged ischaemic time, cytomegalovirus coinfection, over immunosuppression and / or abrupt changes in immunosuppression, HIV coinfection, infection by genotype 1b. Cautious follow-up of the pathology of the graft is mandatory including routine biopsies and / or noninvasive monitoring of fibrosis.     

Immunohistochemical staining of liver grafts with a monoclonal antibody against HCV-Envelope 2 for recurrent hepatitis C after living donor liver transplantation

Aim:  We evaluated the expression of hepatitis C virus (HCV) antigen on liver grafts by immunohistochemical staining (IHS) using IG222 monoclonal antibody (mAb) against HCV-envelope 2 (E2).
Methods:  The study material was 84 liver biopsy specimens obtained from 28 patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for HCV infection. The biopsy samples were examined histopathologically, and by IHS using IG222 mAb against HCV-E2. Serum HCV-RNA level was measured in all patients. The IHS grades were compared among the three groups classified according to the time elapsed from LDLT (at 1–30, 31–179 and ≥180 days post-LDLT) and among four post-transplant conditions, including acute cellular rejection (ACR).
Results:  Immunoreactivity to IG222 was detected in 78.6% of the specimens obtained during the first month after LDLT, and there were no significant differences on the IHS grades between the three groups classified according to the time elapsed from LDLT. The IHS grades were significantly stronger in definite recurrent HCV ( n  = 12) and probable recurrent HCV ( n  = 7) than in definite ACR ( n  = 7) and other complications ( n  = 8). There were no significant differences in serum HCV-RNA levels among the four post-transplant conditions. There was no significant correlation between the IHS grades using IG222 mAb and serum HCV-RNA levels when data of 84 liver biopsy specimens were analyzed.
Conclusions:  Constant HCV-E2 expression was observed in liver biopsy specimens obtained 1 month or longer. The strong HCV-E2 expression on liver grafts were associated with recurrent hepatitis C after LDLT, but the serum HCV-RNA levels were not.     

Clinical features of biochemical cholestasis in patients with recurrent hepatitis C after living‐donor liver transplantation

Summary. Recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation (HepC‐LT) progresses faster than hepatitis C in non‐transplant settings. Cholestasis has been suggested to be one characteristic of HepC‐LT related to the rapid progression. We investigated the clinical features of biochemical cholestasis, which we defined as high serum concentrations of alkaline phosphatase and γ‐glutamyl transpeptidase, in patients with recurrent hepatitis C after living‐donor liver transplantation. Eighty patients were diagnosed with post‐transplant recurrent hepatitis C after exclusion of other aetiologies of cholestasis by liver biopsy and imaging. The clinical features of biochemical cholestasis in the patients with HepC‐LT, including histological changes, the efficacy of interferon therapy and helper T‐cell (Th) subsets in the peripheral blood, were analysed. Fifty‐five of the 80 patients with HepC‐LT (69%) had evidence of biochemical cholestasis. Progression of liver fibrosis to stage F3 or F4 was significantly accelerated in patients with biochemical cholestasis compared with patients without cholestasis. The biochemical cholestasis in patients with HepC‐LT improved after interferon therapy in 22 of 39 patients (56%) who showed a virological response to the therapy, suggesting that hepatitis C virus (HCV) caused the biochemical cholestasis in these patients. Patients with biochemical cholestasis who had a biochemical response to interferon therapy showed an increased Th1 responses in peripheral blood. In conclusion, biochemical cholestasis is the characteristic feature of HepC‐LT and is related to progression of liver fibrosis. An increased Th1 response is associated with cholestasis caused by HCV after liver transplantation.     

Successful living donor liver transplantation using a graft from a hepatitis B surface antigen-positive donor.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Liver transplantation using a graft from a donor with a positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) has been contraindicated owing to the extremely high risk for recurrent disease leading to graft loss. However, the severe shortage of donors often forces the transplant community to utilize suboptimal donors, especially in the setting of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). METHOD: Here, we report a case of successful LDLT for a patient with hepatitis B-related cirrhosis utilizing a graft from an HBsAg-positive 'healthy carrier' donor using a combination prophylaxis of lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil. RESULTS: To date, the patient has been doing well with normal liver function tests and liver histological findings at 4 years after the transplantation and the donor has also been doing well. CONCLUSIONS: Although virological recurrence appears to be universal despite prophylaxis, re-evaluation of the use of a graft from a healthy HBsAg-positive donor is warranted in this era of combination prophylaxis.     

Living donor liver transplantation to patients with hepatitis C virus cirrhosis

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is an alternative therapeutic option for patients with end-stage hepatitis C virus (HCV) cirrhosis because of the cadaveric organ shortage. HCV infection is now a leading indication for LDLT among adults worldwide, and there is a worse prognosis with HCV recurrence. The antivirus strategy after transplantation, however, is currently under debate. Recent updates on the clinical and therapeutic aspects of living donor liver transplantation for HCV are discussed in the present review.     

Plasma cell hepatitis induced by the termination of antiviral therapy for recurrent hepatitis C after living donor liver transplantation

Plasma cell hepatitis (PCH) is an idiopathic disorder characterized by plasma cell infiltration in the allografts of patients who have undergone liver transplantation. Although an increasing number of cases of PCH have been reported in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C recurrence treated with interferon, it is unclear whether PCH is induced by interferon itself. Here, we describe the cases of two patients who developed PCH just after the termination of antiviral therapy for recurrent hepatitis C after living donor liver transplantation. Liver dysfunction appeared at 1 month in one patient and 2 months in the other patient after pegylated interferon plus ribavirin therapy, and liver histology showed interface hepatitis with plasma cell‐rich lymphoid aggregates. Both patients recovered after steroid therapy and achieved sustained virological response. These cases suggest that PCH could be induced by the alteration of the immune condition resulting from the termination of antiviral therapy. PCH should be considered when the transaminase levels increase after antiviral therapy, and it should be carefully distinguished from hepatitis C relapse.     

Hepatitis C virus kinetics during the first phase of pegylated interferon-α-2b with ribavirin therapy in patients with living donor liver transplantation

Aim:  To identify the problems of pegylated interferon (PEG IFN) with ribavirin therapy against hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfection in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) patients. HCV kinetics during the PEG IFN with ribavirin therapy were analyzed in LDLT patients, as well as in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients.
Methods:  The study included 80 consecutive HCV infected patients undergoing PEG IFN with ribavirin therapy (64 CHC and 16 LDLT patients) who attended the Nagasaki University Hospital for an initial visit between January 2005 and December 2007.
Results:  The sustained viral response (VR) rate of the CHC group (80%) was superior to the LDLT group (22%). The viral disappearance rate of the CHC group was also superior to the LDLT group, regardless of the HCV serotype. The HCV core antigen (cAg) titer under treatment in the LDLT group was more than that of the CHC group from day 0 to week 12. The HCV cAg decrease rate of the LDLT group on the first day of treatment was less than that of the CHC group.
Conclusion:  The HCV infection of a transplanted liver is more refractory to treatment than a non-transplanted liver. The low reduction HCV cAg rate on day 1 is one of the problems of the combination therapy.     

Liver transplantation for hepatitis C

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the leading cause of endstage liver disease in Western and Asian countries. However, after liver transplantation, HCV recurs in virtually all patients, and estimated HCV-related graft cirrhosis at 5-year follow-up is 30%. Although immunosuppression accounts for a major part of the accelerated progression of HCV in the transplant population, the best immunosuppression for recipients with HCV that could avoid such complication remains unknown at present. Combination therapy of interferon and ribavirin is thought to be the most effective for the treatment or prophylaxis of HCV infection. However, who should be treated, when treatment should be initiated, and with what agent should patients with HCV infection be treated are still unknown. The current data on HCV recurrence in patients who have received either living- or deceased-donor liver transplantation are controversial, but they are, presumably, similar. Thus, to avoid HCV recurrence in living-donor liver transplantation, we have to take approaches similar to those used for patients receiving deceased-donor liver transplantation. Based on reports from major transplant centers around the world, we consider the best strategy for liver transplantation-related HCV infection is steroid-free immunosuppression and preemptive low-dose interferon and ribavirin combination therapy. Here we describe our experience with living-donor liver transplantion for patients with hepatitis C at Osaka University. There is a need for standardizing the treatment for HCV infection. This can only be achieved through collaborative work between various liver transplant centers worldwide.