Mitral valve repair and replacement for rheumatic disease

OBJECTIVES: Mitral valve repair may be technically feasible in patients with suitable anatomy, but the appropriateness of repair for rheumatic disease remains controversial. We evaluated our late outcomes after mitral repair and replacement for rheumatic disease. METHODS: Five hundred seventy-three patients underwent mitral valve surgery for rheumatic disease at our institution from 1978-1995. Follow-up was 98% complete (mean, 68 +/- 46 months). Survival and morbidity were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression, including propensity score analysis. RESULTS: Mean age was 54 +/- 14 years, 55% of patients had congestive heart failure, 22% were undergoing redo mitral valve surgery, and 9% also underwent coronary bypass. Mitral stenosis was present in 53%, regurgitation in 15%, and both in 32%. Valve repair was performed in 25%, bioprosthetic replacement was performed in 28%, and a mechanical valve was placed in 47%. Patients undergoing repair were younger and less likely to be undergoing reoperation or to have atrial fibrillation than those undergoing replacement (P =.001). The operative mortality rate was 4. 2%. Better late cardiac survival was independently predicted by valve repair rather than replacement (P =.04) after adjustment for baseline differences between patients. Freedom from reoperation was greatest (P =.005) but that from thromboembolic complications was worst (P <.0001) after mechanical valve replacement. Twenty-three patients underwent reoperation after initial repair, with no operative deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical valves minimize reoperation but limit survival and increase thromboembolic complications. Patients undergoing valve repair had improved late cardiac survival independent of their preoperative characteristics. Rheumatic mitral valves should be repaired when technically feasible, accepting a risk of reoperation, to maximize survival and reduce morbidity.     

老年风湿性二尖瓣病变行二尖瓣修复术与生物瓣膜置换术中期效果比较

目的比较60岁以上老年患者风湿性二尖瓣修复(MVP)与生物瓣膜置换(MVR)的中期效果。方法选取2014年1月至2016年1月北京安贞医院瓣膜外科诊疗中心行风湿性二尖瓣修复或生物瓣置换手术的60岁以上老年风湿性二尖瓣病变患者,包括同期行三尖瓣修复术及房颤射频消融术患者;排除合并主动脉瓣手术、冠状动脉旁路移植手术、二次手术患者,最终纳入患者82例。根据二尖瓣手术方式分为二尖瓣修复组(MVP组,25例)和生物瓣置换组(MVR组,57例)。采用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析并绘制曲线,通过Log Rank方法比较两组患者5年生存率的差异。结果围手术期全组患者平均年龄(66.37±4.41)岁。54.9%的患者心功能(NYHA分级)Ⅲ级。两组患者在体外循环时间(P=0.99),主动脉阻断时间(P=0.88),术后住院时间(P=0.76)差异均无统计学意义。MVR组3例患者住院期间死亡,病死率5.3%;MVP组无住院期死亡(P=0.24)。随访5年,最长随访63个月,平均随访47.03个月。MVR组6例死亡,其中4例死于心脑血管不良事件,2例死于非心脑血管不良事件。MVP组无死亡。两组均无再手术病例。结论风湿性二尖瓣病变的老年患者采用二尖瓣修复手术治疗能够获得较好的中期效果。     

Triple valve repair for rheumatic heart disease

The onset of the clinical expression of rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is variable. Exercise or other states that necessitate increased cardiac output often precipitate symptoms. Mitral stenosis (MS) is present in 25% of patients with RHD, and 40% of patients have concomitant MS and mitral regurgitation. About two third of patients with MS have concurrent aortic insufficiency. Pulmonary and tricuspid insufficiency may occur from rheumatic involvement of these valves, or secondary to dilatation of valve annuli from pulmonary hypertension secondary to mitral and/or aortic valve disease. Pregnancy is associated with many hemodynamic changes including expanded intravascular volume, tachycardia, increased intracardiac dimensions, and valvular regurgitation. We report a case of a young female who developed flash pulmonary edema during parturition and was found to have abnormal rheumatic involvement of her aortic, mitral, and tricuspid valves. Successful triple valve repair was performed in a single operation. A review of rheumatic valvular abnormalities, and literature supporting multivalvular repair for rheumatic heart disease is provided.     

Ross procedure in rheumatic aortic valve disease.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the results of aortic valve replacement with the pulmonary autograft in patients with rheumatic heart disease. METHODS: From October 1993 through September 2003, 81 rheumatic patients with aortic valve disease, mean age 29.5+/-11.9 years (11-56 years) underwent, the Ross procedure with root replacement technique. Forty patients were 30 years of age or below (young rheumatics). Associated procedures included mitral valve repair (n=19), open mitral commissurotomy (n=15), tricuspid valve repair (n=2), and homograft mitral valve replacement (n=2). RESULTS: Early mortality was 7.4% (six patients). Mean follow-up was 92.3+/-40.9 months (7-132 months, median 109 months). Sixty of the 73 patients whose follow-up was available (82%) had no significant aortic regurgitation. Re-operation was required in seven (8.4%) patients for autograft dysfunction with failed mitral valve repair (n=3), autograft dysfunction alone (n=2) and failed mitral valve repair alone (n=2). No re-operations were required for the pulmonary homograft. There were six (7.5%) late deaths. Actuarial survival and re-operation-free survival at 109 months were 84.5+/-4.1% and 90.5+/-3.7%, respectively. Freedom from significant aortic stenosis or regurgitation was 78.4+/-5.2% and event-free survival was 64.6+/-5.8%. When compared to rheumatics above 30 years of age, the relative risk of autograft dysfunction was high in the young rheumatics. CONCLUSION: The Ross procedure is not suitable for young patients with rheumatic heart disease. However, it provides acceptable mid-term results in carefully selected older (>30 years) patients with isolated rheumatic aortic valve disease.     

Outcomes of mitral valve replacement in children: a competing-risks analysis

OBJECTIVE: We sought to define patient characteristics, outcomes, and associated factors after mitral valve replacement in children. METHODS: We included 104 children undergoing at least one mitral valve replacement between 1980 and 2003 and reviewed clinical records. Competing-risks methodology was used to determine time-related prevalence and associated risk factors after initial mitral valve replacement for death and repeat replacement. RESULTS: The underlying mitral valve disease was congenital in 83%, rheumatic in 13%, Marfan syndrome in 3%, and isolated endocarditis in 1%, with 64% having primarily regurgitation, 16% having stenosis, 20% having both, and 32% having undergone previous valvotomy, valvuloplasty, or repair. There were 137 valve replacements, with 26 patients having more than one. Valve prosthesis type was St Jude Medical in 37%, Bjork-Shiley in 25%, Carbomedics in 20%, Ionescu-Shiley in 10%, and other types in 8%. Both early and late complications were common. Median age at the initial replacement was 5.9 years (range, birth to 19 years). Competing-risks analysis predicted 19% to have died at 15 years after initial replacement, with risk factors including noncongenital valve morphology, lower weight, and longer duration of cardiopulmonary bypass. A repeat replacement was predicted for 71%, with risk factors including the presence of multiple left-heart obstructive lesions and Ionescu-Shiley valve prosthesis. CONCLUSIONS: Mitral valve replacement might be necessary in children with extremely dysplastic valves and severe hemodynamic impairment or after failed repair. However, with the appropriate selection of the prosthetic valve and reduction of cardiopulmonary bypass time, surgeons might decrease mortality and increase prosthesis longevity.     

Durability and outcome of aortic valve replacement with mitral valve repair versus double valve replacement

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate morbidity and mortality after double valve replacement (DVR) and aortic valve replacement with mitral valve repair (AVR + MVP). METHODS: From 1977 to 2000, 379 patients underwent DVR (n = 299) or AVR + MVP (n = 80). Actuarial survival and freedom from reoperation were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method. Potential predictors of mortality and reoperation were entered into a Cox multiple regression model. Propensity score was introduced for the multivariable regression modeling for adjustment of a selection bias. RESULTS: Survival 15 years after surgery was similar between the groups (DVR, 81% +/- 3%; AVR + MVP, 79% +/- 7%; p = 0.44). Freedom from thromboembolic event at 15 years was similar between the groups (p = 0.25). Freedom from mitral valve reoperation at 15 years was significantly better for the DVR group (54% +/- 5%) as compared with the AVR + MVP group (15% +/- 6%; p = 0.0006), primarily due to progression of mitral valve pathology and early structural deterioration of bioprosthetic aortic valve used for patients with AVR + MVP. After AVR + MVP, freedom from mitral reoperation at 15 years was 63% +/- 16% for nonrheumatic heart diseases, and 5% +/- 5% for rheumatic disease (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Although both DVR and AVR + MVP provided excellent survival, DVR with mechanical valves should be the procedure of choice for the majority of patients because of lower incidence of valve failure and similar rate of thromboembolic complications compared with AVR + MVP. MVP should not be performed in patients with rheumatic disease because of higher incidence of late failure.     

Mitral valve replacement in the pediatric age group- a single institution experience

Background  Mitral valve replacement in pediatric patient is a difficult surgical task, with many intraoperative and post-operative considerations. We conducted this study to evaluate the indications and early results of mitral valve replacement in children. Methods  From January 2003 to July 2008, fifty-four children under the age of fifteen years underwent mitral valve replacement at our institution. All children received a mechanical bi-leaflet or tilting disc prosthetic valve. All of them underwent valve replacement on the basis of preoperative echocardiography and intraoperative assessment of valve pathology. Results  Preoperatively 65% of the children were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III and 35% of them were in NYHA class IV. The cause of mitral valve disease was chronic rheumatic valve disease in 97% of cases and congenital in 3% of the cases. In the rheumatic group 66% of them had severe mitral regurgitation as predominant lesion. The mean diameter of the implanted valve was 27.17mm. There was no hospital or 30 day mortality. The mean follow-up period was 3.6 years. One patient died after 2 years from a stuck valve. Two other patients required thrombolysis for stuck valves. 53 patients are doing well at last follow up. Conclusions  Mitral valve replacement in children is a safe alternative to valve repair when the morphology is not suitable for repair, with acceptable immediate and early outcomes.     

Mitral valve replacement in children

Rheumatic fever leading to advanced valvular heart disease, in adults and children, is still frequently seen in developing countries. In the period 1981-87, 1137 patients underwent open heart surgery for either repair (489 patients), or replacement (639 patients) of defective cardiac valves. The experience with 75 children who underwent mitral valve replacement among this group is reviewed. The aetiology of mitral valve disease was rheumatic in 71, and infective endocarditis in four; 85% of the children were in NYHA functional class III, and 15% in class IV. Seven children had intra-operative findings of rheumatic activity. Pure mitral regurgitation was seen in 41, while mixed mitral valve disease was observed in 34 children. Twenty-seven children underwent mitral valve replacement with Ionescu-Shiley bovine pericardial valves, and 48 with mechanical Bi-leaflet valves. The operative mortality was 9.3%, and the actuarial survival rate, calculated by the Cutler and Ederers method, was 87% at 5 years.     

Repair versus replacement for degenerative mitral valve disease with coexisting ischemic heart disease

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare mitral valve repair and replacement as treatments for degenerative mitral valve disease with coexisting ischemic heart disease. Specifically, we sought to (1) identify differences between patients undergoing repair and replacement, (2) determine whether the choice of mitral valve procedure affected survival after adjusting for those differences, and (3) discover which patients were predicted to benefit from mitral valve repair and which from replacement. METHODS: From 1973 to 1999, 679 patients (mean age, 67 +/- 9.1 years; 73% men) with degenerative mitral valve and ischemic heart diseases underwent combined coronary artery bypass grafting and either mitral valve repair (66%) or replacement (34%). Factors associated with repair and replacement were used for multivariable propensity matching. Risk factors for death were identified by means of multivariable, multiphase hazard-function analysis. RESULTS: Patients more likely to undergo repair had isolated posterior chordal rupture (P <.0001) or more recent date of operation (P <.0001); those more likely to undergo replacement were older (P =.0003) or had bileaflet prolapse (P <.0001). Unadjusted survival at 30 days and 1, 5, and 10 years was 97%, 92%, 79%, and 59% after repair and 94%, 88%, 70%, and 37% after replacement. After adjusting for comorbid factors, the extent and effect of ischemic heart disease, and propensity score, the survival benefit of repair became evident after 2 years (P =.01). Eighty-nine percent of patients were predicted to benefit from repair. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with degenerative mitral valve and ischemic heart diseases, mitral valve repair confers a survival advantage over replacement that becomes evident about 2 years after the operation.     

Homograft mitral valve replacement: five years' results

OBJECTIVE: Results of mitral valve replacement with a mitral homograft were evaluated at 5 years to assess the suitability of the procedure. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients (25 male subjects) aged 10 to 49 years (mean, 32 +/- 10 years) with rheumatic mitral valve disease underwent total (n = 35) or partial (n = 2) mitral valve replacement with a fresh antibiotic-preserved (n = 23) or cryopreserved (n = 14) mitral homograft. The predominant lesion was mitral stenosis (n = 30). RESULTS: There were 5 early deaths. Operative survivors were followed up for 1 to 60 months (mean, 26.6 +/- 12 months). Among these, 21 patients had severe mitral regurgitation during the follow-up period; 3 died and 8 underwent reoperation. The homograft failure rate was not affected by preoperative physiologic lesion (stenosis vs regurgitation, P =.4), type of homograft (antibiotic-preserved vs cryopreserved homograft, P =.9), papillary muscle pretreatment (yes vs no, P =.9), or addition of posterior collar annuloplasty (yes vs no, P =.2). Among the remaining patients, 5 had moderate mitral regurgitation, 4 had either trivial or mild mitral regurgitation, and 2 were lost to follow-up. Study of the explanted mitral homografts (n = 8) revealed that disruption of one of the donor papillary muscles was responsible for early failures (n = 2), whereas cuspal and chordal degeneration was responsible for late failures (n = 6). Microscopically, the explanted valve lacked any viable cellular elements, and there was no evidence of immunologic injury to the homografts. CONCLUSION: The mitral homograft did not fulfill our expectations as a suitable substitute for the diseased mitral valve.     

Mitral valve replacement in the first year of life

From 1973 through 1987 25 patients underwent mitral valve replacement in the first year of life for mitral stenosis and mitral regurgitation. The patients with mitral stenosis included two with mitral arcade, two with supravalvular mitral stenosis with hypoplastic mitral valve, and one with parachute mitral valve. Included in the group of patients with mitral regurgitation were 12 with atrioventricular canal defect, six with chordal and leaflet defects, one with Marfan's syndrome, and one with bacterial endocarditis. Prostheses included 12 Bj?rk-Shiley (17 mm), seven St. Jude Medical (19 mm in four, 21 mm in three), five stent-mounted dura mater valves (12 mm to 16 mm), and one porcine xenograft (19 mm). In four patients the valves were placed in the left atrium in a supraannular location. There were nine operative (atrioventricular canal defect seven, mitral regurgitation two) and five late (atrioventricular canal defect four, mitral stenosis one) deaths, giving actuarial 1- and 5-year survival rates of 52% and 43%, respectively. All 6 patients with tissue valves died; the four with supraannular mitral valve replacement survived. Since 1983 operative mortality has been reduced to 0% (70% confidence limits 0% to 24%). Nine patients required a second mitral valve replacement for prosthetic stenosis 5 to 69 (mean 30) months after the original mitral valve replacement (one operative death). Because of improvements in repair of atrioventricular canal defect in infancy, the need for mitral valve replacement at atrioventricular canal defect repair has decreased. Although valvuloplasty has been advocated for repair of congenital mitral valve disease and is applicable in some infants with mitral regurgitation, mitral valve replacement is frequently unavoidable for congenital mitral disease and can now be accomplished at a low operative risk, even when the prosthesis has to be positioned supraannularly.     

Combined valve replacement and myocardial revascularization

Combining valve replacement with coronary artery bypass (CABG) for significant concomitant disease remains a controversial subject. To determine the operative results following combined valve replacement and CABG, we evaluated 201 patients seen consecutively between July 1977 and June 1982. CABG for vessels with greater than 70% stenosis was performed with aortic valve replacement in 106 patients, with mitral valve replacement in 82, and with aortic and mitral valve replacement in 13. There were 143 men and 58 women; the mean age was 67 years. Nine operative deaths (8.5%) occurred with aortic valve replacement and CABG: 5 of 25 (20%) when cardioplegia was not used and 4 of 81 (4.9%) with cardioplegia (p less than 0.01). The operative mortality rate for isolated aortic valve replacement without coronary disease during the same period was 5.9% (10 of 168). The late actuarial survival rate is similar for aortic valve replacement alone or aortic valve replacement and CABG. There were no operative deaths among patients having undergone aortic and mitral valve replacement and CABG; the rate was 15% (9 of 60) in patients having undergone aortic and mitral replacement and CABG. The operative mortality rate was 21.9% for mitral valve replacement and CABG (18 of 82). Rheumatic disease was present in 14 of these patients, two of whom had early deaths (14.3%), both after repeat mitral operations; 11 mitral valve replacements and CABG were done for degenerative mitral regurgitation with no deaths, and the remaining 57 patients had ischemic mitral regurgitation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Early and late results of mitral valve repair for mitral valve regurgitation. Significant risk factors of reoperation

BACKGROUND: Mitral valve repair for mitral valve regurgitation has many advantages over mitral valve replacement. However, durability and reoperation after mitral valve repair still remain major problems. We examined the outcome of mitral valve repair for mitral valve regurgitation and analyzed several pre- and intraoperative potential risk factors to determine the significant risk factors of reoperation. METHODS: From February 1981 to November 1996, 86 patients underwent mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation or combined mitral regurgitation and stenosis. The mean age was 53 years, and 88.4% were New York Heart Association class III or IV. The causes of mitral valve disease were degenerative disease in 53 patients, rheumatic disease in 15, infective endocarditis in 11, and ischemic disease in 7. There were 2 early and 8 late deaths. RESULTS: Actuarial overall survival including early death at 10 years was 83.2+/-6.1%, freedom from reoperation was 86.8+/-5.3%, freedom from thromboembolism was 90.9+/-6.2%, and freedom from infective endocarditis was 98.5+/-1.5%. There was no bleeding event. At the last follow-up, most patients were in New York Heart Association class I or II. Prolapse of anterior leaflet and rheumatic mitral regurgitation were identified as independent predictors for reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: The repair techniques for anterior leaflet prolapse and patient selection in rheumatic mitral disease are important for improving long-term results of mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation.     

Influence of concomitant mitral valve dysfunction on survival after aortic valve replacement

Aortic valve pathology is the most common acquired valvular heart disease in the adults of western countries, and mitral regurgitation (MR) is often clinically present in patients with degenerative aortic stenosis or insufficiency. Many studies report an incidence of MR between 65-75% in patients evaluated for aortic valve replacement. Severe aortic valve disease may be associated with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) defined as the failure of mitral valve to prevent systolic backward flow in the absence of any significant structural or intrinsic valvular disease. Increased afterload and left ventricular remodeling have been implicated to explain FMR in patients with aortic valve disease. Moreover, organic mitral valve disease can be associated with aortic stenosis and can be rheumatic or degenerative. We have examined the data of the literature to understand the evolution of MR, the impact of mitral regurgitation on the outcome of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement, and to determine clinical predictors of prognosis in patients with concomitant MR at the time of aortic valve replacement.     

Results of prosthetic valve replacement for aortic stenosis

Background: Aortic valve replacement with mechanical valves is associated with a small but constant risk of valve thrombosis and thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications. The surgical outcome of patients with Aortic Stenosis who had aortic valve replacement with mechanical valves is reported here. Methods: Between January 1990 and October 1999, 275 patients underwent prosthetic valve replacement for isolated aortic stenosis. The age ranged between 13 years and 75 years and 230 were males. The cause of aortic stenosis was rheumatic in 185 patients (67.3%), followed by bicuspid aortic valve in 75 patients (27.3%) and degenerative in 15 patients (5.4%). Results: The early mortality was 1.5%. The follow up was 96% complete and ranged from 1 to 104 months (mean 54±24.5months). Six patients (2.2%) developed prosthetic valve endocarditis. Paravalvular leak occurred in 3 (0.9%) patients. Valve thrombosis occurred in 10 patients (1.0% per patient year). The actuarial survival was 81±7% at 5 years and 64±13% at 8 years. Event free survival was 40±14% at 8 years. Conclusion: With current operative techniques and myocardial preservation aortic stenosis patients are at low risk for surgery. However, long term survival is limited due to prosthesis related complications.     

Risk factors for atherosclerosis and the degeneration of pericardial valves after aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have demonstrated the influence of atherosclerotic risk factors on the progression of aortic stenosis. We hypothesized that risk factors for atherosclerosis might also be involved in the degeneration of pericardial heart valves and might lead to reoperation as a result of structural valve failure, especially in younger patients with high degeneration rates. METHODS: In 1984 and 1985, 161 patients (74% male; mean age, 54.4 +/- 1.0 years; age range, 17-76 years; median age, 56.5 years) survived isolated aortic (n = 137) or combined aortic and mitral (n = 25) valve replacement with a Hancock extracorporeal pericardial valve. Of these patients, 90 (56%) had reoperations as a result of tissue failure of the aortic valve 5.6 +/- 0.25 years postoperatively. RESULTS: The patient group was split in half at the median age. In patients aged 57 years or younger, diabetes mellitus, female sex, cigarette smoking, and high cholesterol and triglyceride levels were associated with accelerated valve failure. In a multivariate model sex (female, P =.001), smoking (P =.001), diabetes mellitus (P =.020), and cholesterol levels (P =.011) are risk factors for reoperation. Patients without risk factors had reoperation after a mean of 9.25 +/- 0.88 years compared with 4.05 +/- 0.43 years (P =.0002) in patients with 2 or 3 risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors of atherosclerosis might play a substantial role in the degeneration of aortic bioprosthetic valves. Lowering of serum lipid levels, smoking cessation, therapy for diabetes, and careful patient selection could be new strategies to postpone degeneration. Younger patients could then possibly benefit from the advantages of bioprostheses.     

Twenty-year comparison of tissue and mechanical valve replacement

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare outcomes with tissue and St Jude Medical mechanical valves over a 20-year period. METHODS: Valve-related events and overall survival were analyzed in 2533 patients 18 years of age or older undergoing initial aortic, mitral, or combined aortic and mitral (double) valve replacement with a tissue valve (Hancock, Carpentier-Edwards porcine, or Carpentier-Edwards pericardial) or a St Jude Medical mechanical valve. Total follow-up was 13,390 patient-years. There were 666 St Jude Medical aortic valve replacements, 723 tissue aortic valve replacements, 513 St Jude Medical mitral valve replacements, 402 tissue mitral valve replacements, 161 St Jude Medical double valve replacements, and 68 tissue double valve replacements. The mean age was 68 +/- 13.3 years (St Jude Medical valve, 64.5 +/- 12.9; tissue valve, 72.0 +/- 12.6). RESULTS: There were no overall differences in survival between tissue and mechanical valves. Multivariable analysis indicated that the type of valve did not affect survival. Analysis by age less than 65 years or 65 years or older and presence or absence of coronary disease revealed similar long-term survival in all subgroups. The risk of hemorrhage was lower in patients receiving tissue aortic valve replacements but was not significantly different in patients receiving mitral valve or double valve replacements. Thromboembolism rates were similar for tissue and mechanical valve recipients. However, reoperation rates were significantly higher in patients receiving both aortic and mitral tissue valves. The reoperation hazard increased progressively with time both in patients receiving aortic and in those receiving mitral tissue valves. Overall valve complications were initially higher with mechanical aortic valves but not with mechanical mitral valves. However, valve complication rates later crossed over, with higher rates in tissue valve recipients after 7 years in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement and 10 years in those undergoing aortic valve replacement. CONCLUSIONS: Tissue and mechanical valve recipients have similar survival over 20 years of follow-up. The primary tradeoff is an increased risk of hemorrhage in patients receiving mechanical aortic valve replacements and an increased risk of late reoperation in all patients receiving tissue valve replacements. The risk of tissue valve reoperation increases progressively with time.     

Heart valve replacement in children

Twenty children with heart valve disease were operated upon and underwent heart valve replacement between 1965 and 1968. Thirteen were girls and seven boys. At the time of operation their ages ranged from 3 to 16 years. All the patients were in classes III or IV prior to operation. Three children suffered from congenital valvular lesions and 17 from rheumatic lesions. In each patient left and/or right heart catheterization and angiographic studies were performed. Six patients underwent aortic valve replacement, 11 mitral, 1 tricuspid, and 2 double valve replacement. Mitral annuloplasty was performed in addition to aortic valve replacement in two patients, and tricuspid annuloplasty in addition to mitral valve replacement in another patient. In 19 patients a prosthetic valve was used and in one an aortic heterograft (pig). Two patients died in the early postoperative period (10%), and two later, two and nine months after surgery (10%). Postoperative thromboembolism occurred in four patients (20%). All have completely recovered. All the surviving 16 patients have been followed for a period of one to four and a half years and all showed significant clinical improvement; all children of school age have returned to school and/or other normal actitivies. The overall result has been encouraging and might justify a more aggressive approach in the management of valvular diseases in this specific group of patients.     

Factors affecting mitral valve reoperation in 317 survivors after mitral valve reconstruction.

From a very heterogeneous group of 340 patients undergoing mitral valve reconstruction from 1969 through 1988, 313 hospital survivors were analyzed for factors affecting the occurrence of reoperative mitral valve procedures related to native mitral valve dysfunction. Follow-up was 100% and extended from 1 year to 20 years (mean follow-up, 7.2 years). Sixty-three patients (18.5% of the 340) required mitral valve reoperation at a mean postoperative interval of 6 years (range, 1 to 15 years). Incremental risk factors analyzed for the event late mitral valve failure included age, sex, preoperative New York Heart Association class, cause of valvular disease, pathophysiology of the mitral valve, previous mitral valve operation, mitral valve pathology, and estimation of mitral valve function at operation after repair. Mitral valve pathophysiology affected the actuarial freedom from mitral valve replacement (p = 0.023 [log-rank]). Actuarial freedom from mitral valve reoperation was 90% at 5 years and 80% at 8 years in patients who had either pure mitral regurgitation or isolated mitral stenosis compared with 80% and 72% at 5 and 10 years, respectively, in patients who had mixed mitral stenosis and regurgitation (p = 0.023). Patients undergoing late reoperation were younger (51.7 +/- 1.56 years [+/- the standard error of the mean]) than those not having reoperation (p less than 0.0003). Durability of the repair was less in patients with rheumatic heart disease (p less than 0.025) and greater in patients with ischemic heart disease (p less than 0.004). Seventy-three percent of patients undergoing reoperation had concomitant operations compared with 68% of those not having reoperation (p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Hemolysis after mitral valve repair: mechanisms and treatment

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to determine the mechanisms of hemolysis after mitral valve repair and to determine outcomes after surgical treatment (mitral replacement or re-repair). METHODS: Between 1981 and 2002, 32 patients (mean age, 58 years) presented with hemolytic anemia after mitral valve repair for degenerative, rheumatic, or ischemic mitral regurgitation (MR). Three types of annuloplasty were used at the initial mitral valve repair: Cosgrove-Edwards, Carpentier-Edwards, and bovine pericardial (Perigard). The diagnosis and the mechanisms of hemolysis were investigated with laboratory testing and echocardiography. RESULTS: Median interval from initial mitral valve surgery to diagnosis of hemolysis was 3 months (range, 1 week to 4 years). At presentation, mean hematocrit was 27.5% +/- 4.9% and 22 patients (69%) required transfusion. Echocardiographic findings varied. Twenty-four patients (77%) had grade 3 or 4 MR. Mitral regurgitant jet types included fragmentation (11 patients, 34%), acceleration (10, 31%), slow deceleration (5, 16%), collision (4, 13%), and free jet (2, 6%). Mitral valve replacement was performed in 28 patients, mitral valve re-repair in 3, and 1 patient did not undergo reoperation. At reoperation the mitral valve repair was physically intact in 25 of 31 patients (81%). There were 2 hospital deaths in patients having reoperation (6%). Actuarial survival was 95% at 1 year and 85% at 5 years. In 1 patient recurrent mechanical hemolysis developed caused by a perivalvular leak after mitral valve replacement. CONCLUSIONS: Hemolysis is a mode of failure of mitral valve repair. Patients with hemolysis generally present within 3 months of mitral valve repair. Although echocardiographic features varied, most patients had high-grade MR and regurgitant jets that fragmented or accelerated. Mitral valve replacement yields favorable outcomes for patients with hemolysis after mitral valve repair.