Arterial ketone body ratio as a possible indicator for liver transplantation in fulminant hepatic failure

Arterial ketone body ratio (AKBR [acetoacetate/beta-hydroxybutyrate]) was measured in nineteen patients under medical supportive therapy for fulminant hepatic failure (FHF), in order to evaluate its predictive value relative to liver transplantation. Of the 19 patients 8 (42%) were salvaged and 11 (58%) died. Seven of 8 survivors showed an increased AKBR over 0.6 at 24-hr after admission, and all of them showed AKBR over 0.8 at 48-hr with subsequent maintenance of the value over 1.0. By contrast, all 11 nonsurvivors demonstrated sustained suppression of AKBR below 0.4 from 24 to 72 hr after admission. AKBR values at 24 and 48 hr showed statistically significant differences between survivors and nonsurvivors. Neither the grade of portal systemic encephalopathy (PSE) nor other conventional laboratory parameters--such as AST, bilirubin, ammonia, prothrombin time, hepaplastin test, fibrinogen, and platelet count--could discriminate between survivors and nonsurvivors by univariate analysis. These results indicate that AKBR can accurately predict the prognosis of FHF at the initial 24-48 hr after admission, and that it can play an important role in setting the indication of FHF for liver transplantation.     

MELD score as a prognostic model for listing acute liver failure patients for liver transplantation

OBJECTIVES: The King's College Hospital (KCH) criteria are widely used for listing patients with acute liver failure (ALF) for liver transplantation (LT). Recent reports have suggested that the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score may be useful in assessing prognosis in ALF (nonparacetamol). This study compares prognostic accuracy of the two systems in patients with paracetamol (POD)-induced ALF treated in this unit. METHODS: Seventy-two patients (average age 38 years; F:M ratio 2:1) admitted from 1994 to 2005 with POD-related ALF were studied. Clinical and biochemical parameters were recorded. The effect of applying a MELD score of greater than 30 as listing criteria for LT was calculated and compared with the KCH criteria. Outcomes were defined as LT, death, or full recovery. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (43%) recovered with medical therapy, 29 (40%) patients died, and 12 (17%) underwent LT. Sixty five percent of patients had a MELD > 30 and therefore could potentially be listed on admission; however, using KCH criteria only 24% patients were listed immediately. Sensitivity and negative predictive value of MELD was higher then KCH; however, we found KCH to have much higher specificity and positive predictive value. CONCLUSION: MELD has higher sensitivity and negative predictive value for POD-induced ALF than the KCH criteria. However, the high false-positive rate associated with MELD limits its clinical utility. The high negative predictive value of MELD score may allow it to be used in conjunction with KCH criteria to avoid unneeded LT in patients who will likely recover spontaneously.     

MELD is superior to King's college and Clichy's criteria to assess prognosis in fulminant hepatic failure.

Assessment of prognosis in fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) is essential for the need and appropriate timing of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). In this study we investigated the prognostic efficacy of King's College criteria, Clichy's criteria, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), and Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease (PELD) in 120 consecutive patients with FHF. Survival with medical therapy (18%), death without OLT (15%), and receipt of a liver transplant were similar in adults (n = 64) and children (n = 56). MELD scores were significantly higher in patients who died compared to those who survived without OLT, both in adults (38 +/- 7 vs. 26 +/- 7, P = 0.0003) and children (39 +/- 7 vs. 23 +/- 6, P = 0.0004). Using logistic regression analysis in this cohort of patients, concordance statistics were significantly higher for MELD (0.95) and PELD (0.99) when compared to King's College (0.74) and Clichy's criteria (0.68). When data was analyzed in a Cox model including patients receiving transplants and censoring the time from admission, the concordance statistic for MELD (0.77) and PELD (0.79) remained significantly higher than that of King's College criteria but not higher than that of Clichy's criteria. In conclusion, this study is the first to show that MELD and PELD are superior to King's College and Clichy's criteria to assess prognosis in FHF. However, because data was generated from a single center and included a rather low number of patients who survived or died without OLT, further confirmation of our findings is required.     

MELD Score: Utility and Comparison with King's College Criteria in Non-Acetaminophen Acute Liver Failure

Objective: To compare Model for End-stage Liver Disease Score (MELD Score, MS) and King's College Hospital (KCH) criteria for finding correlation of mortality in non-acetaminophen induced acute liver failure (NAI-ALF). Study Design: An analytical cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, from 2005 to 2007. Methodology: The study included patients with NAI-ALF. KCH criteria were labelled as good and bad prognosis groups. MELD score were calculated by using the MELD calculator. ROC was plotted and sensitivity analysis was done. ETA was used to see correlation between MELD and KCH. Results: Ninety-one patients with mean age of 32.5 + 16.3 years were studied; 49 were males (54%). Out of these, 57 patients died (63%); two leading causes of non-acetaminophen induced acute liver failure (NAI-ALF) were hepatitis hepatitis B virus (HBV) (n = 30, 33%) followed by hepatitis E virus in (n = 23, 25.3%). According to King's College Hospital (KCH) criteria, 50 patients (88%) who died had bad prognosis and 24 patients (70.6%) who survived had good prognosis. The ROC determined MELD score of 32 was the best predictor of mortality with sensitivity and specificity of 79% and 71%, respectively and positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) of 82% and 67% respectively. There was significant association between mortality and bad prognosis according to KCH criteria (p < 0.001). Overall mean MELD score (MMS) was 35.35 + 8.64. MMS on admission was 38 + 7.32 in patients who died and 30.7 + 8.77 in those who survived (p = < 0.001). MMS correlated equally with KCH criteria (ETA = 0.52). Conclusion: The admission MELD score has an excellent utility and correlates equally with KCH criteria for mortality in NAI- ALF.     

An outcome comparison between primary liver transplantation and retransplantation based on the pretransplant MELD score

Survival after liver retransplantation (RLTX) is worse than after primary liver transplantation (LTX). We studied retrospectively the 2-year outcome in 44 patients who received RLTX more than 30 days after the primary transplant and in 669 after LTX performed between December 1993 and October 1999, focusing on the relation between the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score immediately pretransplant and post-transplant survival. A 2-year survival for RLTX was inferior to LTX (65.9% vs. 82.9%, P < or = 0.01). This difference was greatest with MELD scores < 25; survival within 2 years remained 11.3-18.2% less for RLTX than for LTX (6 months, P = 0.002; 12 months, P = 0.029, 24 months, P = 0.123). Mortality was mainly related to early vascular complications and sepsis. Two-year survival after RLTX was 81.8% if RLTX occurred < 2 years after LTX and 50% if the interval between LTX and RLTX was > 2 years (P < 0.05). MELD scores were similar in 2-year survivors and nonsurvivors after late RLTX (P = 0.82). Late RLTX is marked by poor survival regardless of the pretransplant MELD score. The MELD-based allocation system may not benefit patients who undergo retransplantation.     

Prognostic Value of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Scores in Patients with Fulminant Hepatic Failure

Background

This study was undertaken to investigate risk factors of mortality in patients with fulminant hepatic failure (FHF).

Methods

Fifty-three patients with FHF treated from January 2006 to April 2011 were allocated to a spontaneous survival group (group 1), a death without liver transplantation (LT) group (group 2), and an LT group (group 3). To analyze risk factors associated with mortality in FHF, we excluded group 3 patients. Clinical features, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores, and King's College Hospital criteria at the time of hepatic encephalopathy in group 2 were compared with those of group 1.

Results

The causes of FHF were acute viral infection (n = 29, hepatitis A:B, 28:1), drugs (n = 18; including 4 acetaminophen and 14 herbal medication), autoimmune (n = 4), and miscellaneous (n = 2). Of the 53 patients, 19 were allocated to group 1, 18 to group 2, and 16 to group 3. According to univariate analysis, risk factors for mortality in group 2 were acute renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy and a MELD score ≥30 at the time of hepatic encephalopathy. However, by multivariate analysis, a MELD score ≥30 was the only independent risk factor for mortality in group 2 (P = .042; hazard ratio, 4.500).

Conclusions

A MELD score ≥30 was found to be the only independent risk factor of mortality in FHF patients without LT. Therefore, the findings of this study suggest that these patients may need emergent LT for survival.     

Mortality Analysis of Acute Liver Failure in Uruguay

Background

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a syndrome with high mortality.

Different model for end-stage liver disease score block distributions may have a variable ability for outcome prediction

BACKGROUND: The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scoring system has become the prevailing criteria for organ allocation in liver transplantation. However, it is not clear if the predictive accuracy of MELD is equally homogeneous in different distribution of MELD score blocks. METHODS: We investigated 472 cirrhotic patients (mean MELD, 14.3+/-5.5), and compared the predictive accuracy of MELD and the corresponding Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) scores in patients with low (<16), intermediate (10-20) and high (>14) MELD score range by using c-statistic for area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) at different time frames. RESULTS: The MELD scores well correlated with CTP scores at baseline (rho=0.492, P<0.001). Overall, MELD was significantly better than the CTP system to predict the risk of mortality. However, in stratified analysis there were no significant differences between MELD and CTP for the c-statistic in patients with low and intermediate range MELD scores at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month (p values all > 0 1). Among patients with high MELD scores, MELD was consistently more accurate than the CTP system in predicting the mortality at 3- (AUC, 0.715 vs. 0.543, P=0.020), 6- (0.705 vs. 0.536, P=0.003), 9- (0.737 vs. 0.507, P<0.001) and 12-month (0.716 vs. 0.526, P<0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MELD has a better performance only in a subset of patients with higher MELD scores. The outcome in patients with lower range MELD scores cannot be reliably predicted solely with their MELD scores, and alternative prognostic markers should be used in conjunction to enhance the predictive accuracy.     

Recipient Factors as Determinants of Mortality after Adult Liver Transplantation

The factors that can influence the outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) are numerous. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of recipient preoperative factors on patient mortality. Between April 1986 and April 1998 a total of 600 OLTs were performed in our institution. We retrospectively reviewed our first 203 consecutive primary adult OLTs with at least 4 years of follow-up. A case-control comparison was performed between survivors and nonsurvivors, and differences in recipient variables were studied for their correlation with patient mortality. A logistic regression analysis was also performed. Mortality was significantly increased among those with fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) (66.6%, p= 0.003), primary cancer (63.1%, p= 0.018), females (46.1%, p= 0.043), encephalopathy grade IV (72.7%, p= 0.012), recipients under respiratory support (69.2%, p= 0.031), and ABO-incompatible transplants (80%, p= 0.05). FHF, primary cancer, and female gender were the only variables that had a significant association with mortality in the logistic regression analysis. A higher incidence of prolonged respiratory support, bacterial and fungal infections, pneumonia, and chronic rejection contributed to the lower outcome observed in females. These results stress the need for continuous evaluation of the selection criteria of candidates for OLT suffering from primary cancer and FHF. The impact of recipient gender on mortality warrants further analysis but suggests that in the future more attention must be paid to the influence of this factor on the final outcome of OLT.     

Predictive value of actin-free Gc-globulin in acute liver failure.

Serum concentrations of the actin scavenger Gc-globulin may provide prognostic information in acute liver failure (ALF). The fraction of Gc-globulin not bound to actin is postulated to represent a better marker than total Gc-globulin but has been difficult to measure. We tested a new rapid assay for actin-free Gc-globulin to determine its prognostic value when compared with the King's College Hospital (KCH) criteria in a large number of patients with ALF. A total of 252 patients with varying etiologies from the U.S. ALF Study Group registry were included; the first 178 patients constituted the learning set, and the last 74 patients served as the validation set. Actin-free Gc-globulin was determined with a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. The median (range) actin-free Gc-globulin level at admission for the learning set was significantly reduced compared with controls (47 [0-183] mg/L vs. 204 [101-365] mg/L, respectively, P < 0.001). Gc-globulin levels were significantly higher in spontaneous survivors than in patients who died or were transplanted (53 [0-129] mg/L vs. 37 [0-183] mg/L, P = 0.002). A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that a 40 mg/L cutoff level carried the best prognostic information, yielding positive and negative predictive values of 68% and 67%, respectively, in the validation set. The corresponding figures for the KCH criteria were 72% and 64%. A new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for actin-free Gc-globulin provides the same (but not optimal) prognostic information as KCH criteria in a single measurement at admission.     

Survival Predictors in Ventricular Assist Device Patients With Prior Extracorporeal Life Support: Selecting Appropriate Candidates

Several centers turn patients down for long‐term ventricular assist devices (VADs) once they have received extracorporeal life support (ECLS) due to the expected poor outcome in these patients. The aim of this study was to identify survival predictors in this cohort of patients. Data of patients undergoing VAD support between January 2010 and November 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients on ECLS support before implantation were considered eligible for inclusion. Outcome in survivors following long‐term VAD support was compared with outcomes in nonsurvivors. Student's t‐test and χ²‐test were used as applicable. A total of 65 long‐term VADs were implanted. The inclusion criteria were met by 24 patients. Eight patients did not survive the first 30 days. All preoperative characteristics were comparable between the two groups except for statistically higher Model for End‐stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, bilirubin, white blood cell count, and blood urea nitrogen in nonsurvivors (P = 0.002, 0.01, 0.01, and 0.003, respectively). Stepwise discriminant analysis revealed MELD score as the most important survival predictor. Based on this analysis, an outcome predictor formula was generated. The 30‐day and 1‐year survival rates were 67% and 54%, respectively. In this study, we were able to determine survival predictors in VAD patients with prior ECLS support. The outcome in these patients is limited and associated with higher postoperative complications, particularly right ventricular and respiratory failure. The pre‐VAD MELD score is an important predictor of poor outcome.     

Is the transpulmonary pressure gradient a predictor for mortality after orthotopic cardiac transplantation?

Elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) is a well-known risk factor for right ventricular failure after orthotopic cardiac transplantation. The influence of preoperative transpulmonary pressure gradient (TPG) and PVR on post-transplant 30 days mortality was evaluated. To analyze the response of PVR and TPG to cardiac transplantation, we analyzed 718 adult patients undergoing primary cardiac transplantation. Indications for operation were: 35.2% ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), 61.2% idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), and 3.3% other diagnosis (e.g. hypertrophic cardiomyopathy). The mean age (51.9) and the mean ischemic time (169.7 min) were comparable between 30 days survivors and nonsurvivors. Student's t-tests and chi-square analysis were used to compare data from 30-day survivors and nonsurvivors. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. Fisher's exact test and multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between hemodynamic parameters and outcome after transplantation. Primary end-point was 30 days mortality and secondary end-point long-term survival of patient groups with different TPG and PVR values. In survivors the mean TPG was 10.3 +/- 5.1 (mean +/- SD) vs. 13 +/- 6.6 in patients who died after transplantation (P = 0.0012). The PVR was 2.6 +/- 1.4 vs. 3.5 +/- 2.2 (P = 0.0012). In multivariate logistic regression, the parameters TPG and PVR exhibit a significant influence between survivors and nonsurvivors after cardiac transplantation within 30 days (TPG: P = 0.0012; PVR: P = 0.0012). The mortality rates in patients with TPG > 11 mmHg and PVR < 2.8 Wood units or TPG < 11 mmHg and PVR > 2.8 Wood units were comparable to those with TPG < 11 mmHg and PVR < 2.8 mmHg. The TPG is an important predictor in nonrejection-related early mortality after orthotopic cardiac transplantation. The determination of TPG in combination with PVR is a more reliable predictor of early post-transplant survival than PVR alone.     

Limitation of the model for end-stage liver disease for outcome prediction in patients with cirrhosis-related complications

The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) has been used to prioritize cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation. Bleeding esophageal varices, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and hepatic encephalopathy are major complications of cirrhosis and traditional indications for liver transplantation evaluation. However, these complications are not included in the MELD and it is not clear if these complications correlate with MELD score in terms of outcome prediction. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of cirrhosis-related complication as a prognostic predictor in 290 cirrhotic patients. The MELD score and outcome were compared between patients with and without cirrhosis-related complications. There was no significant difference of the MELD score between patients with (n = 67) and without (n = 223) complications (11.6 +/- 2.9 vs. 12.2 +/- 3.2, p = 0.184). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.687 for MELD vs. 0.604 for complications (p = 0.174) at six months, and the area was 0.641 for MELD vs. 0.611 for complications (p = 0.522) at 12 months. A high MELD score and presence of complications had a similar profile of predictive accuracy and both were significant predictors of mortality at six and 12 months in multivariate logistic regression analysis. Patients with cirrhosis-related complications at presentation had a decreased survival compared with those without complications (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, the occurrence of cirrhosis-related complications is a predictor of poor prognosis. While early transplantation referral is recommended, these patients do not necessarily have a higher MELD score and could be down-staged in the MELD era.     

Spontaneous retroperitoneal hemorrhage

BACKGROUND: We evaluated patients with spontaneous retroperitoneal hemorrhage for reliable predictors of early diagnosis and improved outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was done to determine patient demographic and laboratory findings, presenting symptoms, time to diagnosis, anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet agent use, transfusions, and patient outcome. RESULTS: One hundred nineteen patients were identified; 14 (12%) died (mean age 77 +/- 9 years vs. 74 +/- 10 years for survivors [P = 0.235]). All nonsurvivors were on anticoagulants: 8 of 89 (9%) were on heparin or warfarin alone, and 6 of 23 (26% [P = 0.028]) were on a combined anticoagulant-antiplatelet regimen. Symptom onset to computed axial tomography (CAT) scan averaged 1.3 +/- 1.3 days for nonsurvivors versus 1.5 +/- 1.9 days for survivors (P = 0.778). Hemoglobin was 9.07 +/- 3.35 for nonsurvivors versus 9.60 +/- 2.07 for survivors (P = 0.435). Eighty-eight patients were transfused, and 10 died; 31 patients had no transfusion, and 4 of these died (P = 0.821). CONCLUSIONS: A high index of clinical suspicion is necessary for diagnosis of spontaneous retroperitoneal hemorrhage because these patients present with a variety of symptoms. Prospective studies are necessary to determine whether earlier diagnosis combined with aggressive resuscitation can impact the high mortality rate seen in these patients.     

APACHE III Score Is Superior to King's College Hospital Criteria,MELD score and APACHE II Score to Predict Outcomes After Liver Transplantation for Acute Liver Failure

Objectives

The Model for End–Stage Liver Disease score and king's College Hospital (KCH) criteria are accepted prognostic models acute liver failure (ALF), while the use of (APACHE) scores predict to outcomes of emergency liver transplantation is rare.

Materials and Methods

The present study included 87 patients with ALF who underwent liver transplantation. We calculated (KCH) criteria, as well as MELD, APACHE II, and APACHE III scores at the listing date for comparison with 3-month outcomes.

Results

According to the Youden-Index, the best cut-off value for the APACHE II score was 8.5 with 100% sensitivity, 49% specificity, 24% positive predictive value (PPV), and 100% negative predictive value (NPV). Patients with <8.5 points had a significantly higher survival rate (P < .05). The proposed APACHE III cut-off was 80. The APACHE III score demonstrated the highest specificity and PPV (90% specificity, 50% PPV). The NPV was 92%. With a 90-point threshold the specificity increased to 98% with 75% PPV and 89% NPV. Only 1 of 4 patients with a score >90 survived transplantation (P = .001). MELD score and KCH criteria were not significant (P > .05). According to the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, only the APACHE III score adequately describe the data.

Conclusions

The APACHE III score was superior to KCH criteria, MELD score, and APACHE II score to predict outcomes after transplantation for ALF. It is a valuable parameter for pretransplantation patient selection.     

Catholic university experience with molecular adsorbent recycling system in patients with severe liver failure

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Molecular adsorbent recycling system (MARS) treatment is able to remove both hydrosoluble and small- and medium-sized lipophilic toxins. MARS plays an important role in modifying liver failure complications, such as hepatorenal syndrome and hepatic encephalopathy. We sought to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of a MARS device in a consecutive series of hepatic failure patients. MATERIALS: Twenty patients with acute liver failure, transplantation failure, or acute on chronic liver failure fulfilled the inclusion criteria of total bilirubin > or =10 mg/dL and at least one of the following: hepatic encephalopathy (HE) > or =II grade, hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) for chronic patients or total bilirubin > or =5 mg/dL and HE > or =I grade for acute patients. RESULTS: MARS was able to reduce cholestatic parameters and improve neurologic status and renal function parameters in all treated patients. We also observed an improvement in the 3-month survival rate compared to the expected outcome in patients with MELD scores between 20 and 29, as well as 30 and 39. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, we confirm the safety and clinical efficacy of MARS treatment, with the best results in patients with MELD score of 20 to 29. Further studies are necessary to confirm whether this treatment is able to modify patient outcomes and prognosis.     

Predictive Value of Models for End-Stage Liver Disease Score in Patients With Pulsatile Flow POLVAD MEV Left Ventricular Assist Device Support

Background

Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score predicts multisystem dysfunction and death in patients with heart failure (HF). Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have been used for the treatment of end-stage HF.

Anticoagulation and the elderly head trauma patient

We sought to determine the effect of anticoagulation therapy on outcomes in elderly patients with closed head injury. We retrospectively reviewed elderly closed head injury patients (> or = 65 years) comparing 52 patients on warfarin (AC) with 439 patients not on warfarin (NAC) with subsequent 1:3 propensity matching used to analyze comparable groups. The overall AC group had a higher head abbreviated injury score (AIS) (4.0 +/- 0.7 vs 3.8 +/- 0.7, P = 0.04) compared with the NAC group. After propensity matching, 49 AC patients were compared with 147 NAC patients who were similar for age, gender, injury severity score, and head AIS. Admission INR was higher in the AC group compared to the NAC group (2.5 +/- 1.3 vs 1.1 +/- 0.3, P < 0.0001) and the AC group had a higher mortality rate (38.8% AC (19/49) vs 23.1% NAC (34/147), P = 0.04). In the AC group, survivors and nonsurvivors had similar repeat International Normalized Ratio (INR) values (1.57 +/- 0.65 survivors vs 1.8 +/- 0.72 nonsurvivors, P = 0.31). The AC group experienced greater morbidity after trauma and had higher mortality rates than their NAC counterparts. Prevention of injury and more selective use of warfarin in this patient population are essential to decrease mortality.     

Liver transplantation for children with Wilson disease: comparison of outcomes between children and adults

Arnon R, Annunziato R, Schilsky M, Miloh T, Willis A, Sturdevant M, Sakworawich A, Suchy F, Kerkar N. Liver transplantation for children with Wilson disease: comparison of outcomes between children and adults.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: E52–E60. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Liver transplantation (LT) is lifesaving for patients with Wilson disease (WD) presenting with fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) or chronic liver disease (CLD) unresponsive to treatment. Aim: To determine the outcome of LT in pediatric and adult patients with WD. Methods: United Network for Organ Sharing data on LT from 1987 to 2008 were analyzed. Outcomes were compared for patients requiring LT for FHF and CLD after 2002. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine risk factors for death and graft loss. Results: Of 90 867 patients transplanted between 1987 and 2008, 170 children and 400 adults had WD. The one‐ and five‐yr patient survival of children was 90.1% and 89% compared to 88.3% and 86% for adults, p = 0.53, 0.34. After 2002, 103 (41 children) were transplanted for FHF and 67 (10 children) for CLD. One‐ and five‐yr patient survival was higher in children transplanted for CLD compared to FHF; 100%, 100% vs. 90%, 87.5% respectively, p = 0.30, 0.32. One‐ and five‐yr patient survival was higher in adults transplanted for CLD compared to FHF; 94.7%, 90.1% vs. 90.3%, 89.7%, respectively, p = 0.36, 0.88. Encephalopathy, partial graft, and ventilator use were risk factors for death by logistic regression. Conclusion: LT is an excellent treatment option for patients with WD. Patients transplanted for CLD had higher patient survival rates than patients with FHF.     

Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and organ allocation from cadaveric donors for 198 liver transplantation procedures performed in a single center

Since February 2002, the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) proposed to adopt a modified version of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) to assign priority on the waiting list for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). In this study, we evaluated the impact of MELD score on liver allocation in a single center series of 198 liver recipients (mean age of patients, 52.21+/-8.92 years), considering the relationship between clinical urgency derived from MELD score (overall MELD, 18.7+/-6.83; MELD <15 in 69 patients, MELD >or=15 in 129 patients) and geographical distribution of cadaveric donors (inside/outside Liguria Region, 125/73). The waiting time for OLT was 230+/-248 days, whereas the 3-month and 1-year patient survivals were 87.37% and 79.79%, respectively. No difference was observed for MELD score retrospectively calculated for patients who underwent OLT before February 2002 (n=71) compared with MELD score calculated for patients who received a liver thereafter (18.26+/-6.68 vs 18.94+/-6.92; P= .504). No significant difference was found in waiting time before and after adoption of MELD score (213+/-183 vs 238+/-278 days; P= .500), or by stratifying patients for MELD <15/>or=15 (225+/-234 vs 232+/-256 days; P= .851). Using the geographical distribution of donors as a grouping variable (outside vs inside Liguria Region), no significance occurred for MELD score (19.68+/-7.42 vs 18.17+/-6.42; P= .135) or waiting time (211+/-226 vs 242+/-261 days; P= .394). In our series, more OLTs were performed among sicker patients and no differences were found in the management of livers procured from cadaveric donors outside or inside Liguria Region. However, further efforts are needed to reduce the waiting time among patients with higher MELD scores.